SRCC GBO 2022 Question Paper

64 is 4 cubed. 
The ? should be replaced by 13 cubed. 

$$13^3=2197$$

Therefore, Option B is the correct answer. 

Let's take a look at Lora's statements:
In her first statement, Lora says that Tammy distracted her, and in the second statement, she says that Tammy always tells the truth. 

According to this, Lora herself can never be the truth-teller because she says that Tammy is the truth-teller and there can only be one truth-teller. 

That leaves us with three cases:
Lora is a liar
In that case, Tammy is not a truth-teller. Making Tammy the alternator. 
In her first statement, Lora said that Tammy distracted her, which must be a lie. 
This must mean that Tammy's first statement must be true, making her second statement false that Bhumi completed her work meaning that Bhumi did not complete her work. As the only remaining option, it must be the truth-teller. 
According to Bhumi's second statement, Tammy cannot be a liar, which is true. 
Bhumi's first statement can also be true, and Lora could have completed the work. 
This case is valid for all scenarios, making Bhumi the truth-teller or an Avtech employee. 

Let's take Lora to be an alternator which says the truth first:
In this case, Tammy is not a truth teller, meaning Tammy must be a liar. Making Bhumi the truth-teller, but Bhumi saysa that Tammy is not a liar. We have a contradiction here. 

Let's consider the final case, where Lora is an alternator who says the lie first:
In this case, Tammy is the truth-teller, and Bhumi is the liar. But Bhumi says that Tammy is not a liar. If Bhumi always lies, that cannot be the case, and we run into contradictions yet again. 

Therefore, the only possible scenario is that Lora is a liar, Tammy is an alternator, and Bhumi is the truth-teller and must be an Avtech employee. 

Therefore, Option B is the correct answer. 

The statements can be represented using the following diagram:

Coming to the conclusion:
(1) Since all lights are wires and all wires are switches, necessarily all lights would have to be switches. 

(2) Some switches can not be wires, but since all wires are switches, at least some switches would have to be wires. 

Hence, Both the conclusions follow through the statements. 

Therefore, Option D is the correct answer. 

There are 40 students in the class and Anuja's rank is 17th from the top. 
This means there are 16 people above her and 23 below her, making her rank 24th from the bottom. 

Similarly, Mihir is 18th from the top. 
This means there are 17 people ahead hima and 22 below him, making his rank 23rd from the bottom. 

Hence, the correct answer would be 24th and 23rd. 

Therefore, Option C is the correct answer. 

The difference between the first two terms is 329-323 = 6
The difference between the second and third terms is 344-329 = 15

6 is 2 times 3
15 is 3 times 5

The pattern here is that the difference is multiples of consecutive primes; the next difference would be 5 times 7 = 35, making the next term to be 344+35 = 379

The next difference would be 7 times 11 = 77, making the fifth term to be 379+77 = 456

This satisfies our given sequence, and 379 is one of the options. 

Therefore, Option D is the correct answer. 

In the given sequence, we can see that right after s, we get g, and right after f, we get a c 

The first two blanks must then be filled by g and c, respectively
narrowing down our choices to A and B

The last blank should be occupied by sg, in order to give us a complete sequence of sgfc

Therefore, option A is the correct answer. 

Conclusion I: Online education is a necessity, but has many demerits with itself.

This conclusion logically follows from the statements. The statements suggest a heavy reliance on electronic devices for education, indicating the necessity of online education. However, they also highlight the negative consequences of increased screen-time, implying that online education comes with demerits.

Conclusion II: We should stop online education as it has harsh negative effects on people connected to it.

This conclusion does not logically follow from the statements. While the statements highlight the harmful effects of increased screen-time associated with online education, they do not suggest stopping online education entirely. There may be ways to mitigate the negative effects without completely halting online education.

Conclusion III: Online education is very helpful as everything is easily accessible.

This conclusion also logically follows from the statements. The statements indicate that education materials are now easily accessible through electronic devices, supporting the idea that online education is helpful in terms of accessibility. However, it's essential to note that while accessibility is highlighted, the statements also acknowledge the negative consequences of increased screen-time.

So, Conclusions I and III logically follow from the provided statements, while Conclusion II does not.