Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
a) Since education is now dependent on electronic devices, homework and notes, explanation, almost everything is now accessible in our devices, which has increased the screen-time of students and teachers.
b) The increase in the screen-time is harmful for students and teachers. This has resulted in children and teachers weakening themselves.
Conclusions:
I. Online education is a necessity, but has many demerits with itself.
II. We should stop online education as it has harsh negative effects on people connected to it.
III. Online education is very helpful as everything is easily accessible.

Conclusion I: Online education is a necessity, but has many demerits with itself.

This conclusion logically follows from the statements. The statements suggest a heavy reliance on electronic devices for education, indicating the necessity of online education. However, they also highlight the negative consequences of increased screen-time, implying that online education comes with demerits.

Conclusion II: We should stop online education as it has harsh negative effects on people connected to it.

This conclusion does not logically follow from the statements. While the statements highlight the harmful effects of increased screen-time associated with online education, they do not suggest stopping online education entirely. There may be ways to mitigate the negative effects without completely halting online education.

Conclusion III: Online education is very helpful as everything is easily accessible.

This conclusion also logically follows from the statements. The statements indicate that education materials are now easily accessible through electronic devices, supporting the idea that online education is helpful in terms of accessibility. However, it's essential to note that while accessibility is highlighted, the statements also acknowledge the negative consequences of increased screen-time.

So, Conclusions I and III logically follow from the provided statements, while Conclusion II does not.