MAH MBA CET Sample Paper 2025

We know that Tushar is from Guwahati and Umesh is from Delhi.
Now Pawan visited Allahabad so, Pawan cannot be from Allahabad. Thus, one among, Rohit, Sanjay and Vivek has to be from Allahabad. However, from 3 we can rule out Rohit. Thus, either Sanjay or Vivek will be from Allahabad. However, from 2 and 5 we can infer that Sanjay is from Hyderabad and visited Lucknow. Thus, Vivek must be from Allahabad. One among Rohit and Pawan will be from Bhopal and the other one will be from Lucknow.
Now we know that Pawan visited Allahabad, Sanjay visited Lucknow, Rohit visited Guwahati and Vivek visited Delhi. Thus one among Tushar and Umesh will visit Hyderabad and the other one will visit Bhopal.
Thus we have the following table

Let us try to tabulate the given information.
From the given hints we can form a partially filled table as shown below.

Now from statement 5 we know that the person from Maharashtra is pursuing Finance.
It is given that Bhavya is not pursuing Finance and Dani is not from Maharashtra.
From this we can infer that Farhan is from Maharashtra and is pursuing Finance.
Now we know that Eknath and Bhavya are not pursuing Marketing.
This means that Dani is pursuing Marketing.
Now we can conclude that Bhavya is from Telangana and is pursuing Strategy.
Now the completely filled table will be as shown below.

Let us try to tabulate the given information.
From the given hints we can form a partially filled table as shown below.

Now from statement 5 we know that the person from Maharashtra is pursuing Finance.
It is given that Bhavya is not pursuing Finance and Dani is not from Maharashtra.
From this we can infer that Farhan is from Maharashtra and is pursuing Finance.
Now we know that Eknath and Bhavya are not pursuing Marketing.
This means that Dani is pursuing Marketing.
Now we can conclude that Bhavya is from Telangana and is pursuing Strategy.
Now the completely filled table will be as shown below.

Let us try to tabulate the given information.
From the given hints we can form a partially filled table as shown below.

Now from statement 5 we know that the person from Maharashtra is pursuing Finance.
It is given that Bhavya is not pursuing Finance and Dani is not from Maharashtra.
From this we can infer that Farhan is from Maharashtra and is pursuing Finance.
Now we know that Eknath and Bhavya are not pursuing Marketing.
This means that Dani is pursuing Marketing.
Now we can conclude that Bhavya is from Telangana and is pursuing Strategy.
Now the completely filled table will be as shown below.

We know that all the cars sold by a particular company belong to one of these 4 types. Therefore, the total percentage must be 100.

Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
12% of cars sold by Koyota are sedans.
15% of cars sold by Koyota are crossovers.
Therefore, the remaining 100 - (23+12+15) = 50% of the cars sold must be SUVs.

Similarly filling the other values we get the following table.

Let the total number of cars sold by Koyota be x.

We know that, the total number of cars sold by Gyundai is x.
Total number of cars sold by Donda = x.
Total number of cars sold by BM = 2*x = 2x
Total number of cars sold by Folksvagen = 2*2x = 4x.

Total number of hatchbacks sold = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.17*4x + 0.18*2x + 0.32x = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.68x + 0.36x + 0.32x = 925
1.85x = 925
x = 500.

Now, we can find the number of cars of each type sold by a particular company.
Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
Koyota sold 500 cars in total.
Therefore, Number of hatchbacks sold by Koyota = 0.23*500 = 115.
Similarly, we can fill the entire table. The final table is as shown below:

As we can see, the total number of cars sold by the 5 companies put together is 4500. Therefore, option B is the right answer.

We know that all the cars sold by a particular company belong to one of these 4 types. Therefore, the total percentage must be 100.

Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
12% of cars sold by Koyota are sedans.
15% of cars sold by Koyota are crossovers.
Therefore, the remaining 100 - (23+12+15) = 50% of the cars sold must be SUVs.

Similarly filling the other values we get the following table.

Let the total number of cars sold by Koyota be x.

We know that, the total number of cars sold by Gyundai is x.
Total number of cars sold by Donda = x.
Total number of cars sold by BM = 2*x = 2x
Total number of cars sold by Folksvagen = 2*2x = 4x.

Total number of hatchbacks sold = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.17*4x + 0.18*2x + 0.32x = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.68x + 0.36x + 0.32x = 925
1.85x = 925
x = 500.

Now, we can find the number of cars of each type sold by a particular company.
Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
Koyota sold 500 cars in total.
Therefore, Number of hatchbacks sold by Koyota = 0.23*500 = 115.
Similarly, we can fill the entire table. The final table is as shown below:

As we can see, the total number of sedans sold by the 5 companies put together is 1435. Therefore, option B is the right answer.

We know that all the cars sold by a particular company belong to one of these 4 types. Therefore, the total percentage must be 100.

Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
12% of cars sold by Koyota are sedans.
15% of cars sold by Koyota are crossovers.
Therefore, the remaining 100 - (23+12+15) = 50% of the cars sold must be SUVs.

Similarly filling the other values we get the following table.

Let the total number of cars sold by Koyota be x.

We know that, the total number of cars sold by Gyundai is x.
Total number of cars sold by Donda = x.
Total number of cars sold by BM = 2*x = 2x
Total number of cars sold by Folksvagen = 2*2x = 4x.

Total number of hatchbacks sold = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.17*4x + 0.18*2x + 0.32x = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.68x + 0.36x + 0.32x = 925
1.85x = 925
x = 500.

Now, we can find the number of cars of each type sold by a particular company.
Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
Koyota sold 500 cars in total.
Therefore, Number of hatchbacks sold by Koyota = 0.23*500 = 115.
Similarly, we can fill the entire table. The final table is as shown below:

The number of SUVs sold by Folksvagen is 380. Therefore, option A is the right answer.

We know that all the cars sold by a particular company belong to one of these 4 types. Therefore, the total percentage must be 100.

Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
12% of cars sold by Koyota are sedans.
15% of cars sold by Koyota are crossovers.
Therefore, the remaining 100 - (23+12+15) = 50% of the cars sold must be SUVs.

Similarly filling the other values we get the following table.

Let the total number of cars sold by Koyota be x.

We know that, the total number of cars sold by Gyundai is x.
Total number of cars sold by Donda = x.
Total number of cars sold by BM = 2*x = 2x
Total number of cars sold by Folksvagen = 2*2x = 4x.

Total number of hatchbacks sold = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.17*4x + 0.18*2x + 0.32x = 925
0.23x + 0.26x + 0.68x + 0.36x + 0.32x = 925
1.85x = 925
x = 500.

Now, we can find the number of cars of each type sold by a particular company.
Eg) 23% of cars sold by Koyota are hatchbacks.
Koyota sold 500 cars in total.
Therefore, Number of hatchbacks sold by Koyota = 0.23*500 = 115.
Similarly, we can fill the entire table. The final table is as shown below:

The number of cross overs sold by BM is 310. Therefore, option D is the right answer.

From statement 1, 2, and 7 we can gather the following information:

Now, as per statement 2 Tanya will be interviewed either on Tuesday or Thursday and Sachin will be interviewed on either Saturday or Sunday.

If Tanya is interviewed on Thursday and Sachin is interviewed on Saturday then Gayatri must be interviewed on Sunday since statement 5 says at least a one day gap is required between Mahima and Gayatri's interview. So, Abhinav will have to be interviewed on Tuesday. [Case 1]

Similarly, If Tanya is interviewed on Thursday and Sachin is interviewed on Sunday then Gayatri must be interviewed on Saturday since statement 5 says at least a one day gap is required between Mahima and Gayatri's interview. However, Gayatri is asked questions on Indian Bankruptcy Code (IBC) (from statement 6) while the person interviewed on Saturday is asked admin law (statement 1) so this case is not possible.

If Tanya is interviewed on Tuesday and Sachin on Sunday then Gayatri will have to be interviewed on Thursday since she is asked about IBC and not admin law.

From statement 4 we know that the ones wearing blazers must be on consecutive days apart from the weekend. Also, Digivijay does not wear a blazer (statement 1) so the ones wearing a blazer can either be on Monday and Tuesday or Thursday and Friday. From statement 3 we know that the ones carrying files are interviewed before Thursday, so on any two of the days among Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. 

Even if one of the days is Wednesday, at least one person must carry a file on Monday and Tuesday. So, the ones wearing a blazer must be on Thursday and Friday.

In Case 1, upon placing the information we get the following:

However, as per statement 8, this is not possible. So, this case can be eliminated.

Similarly we can eliminate other cases. The only possible way, all the conditions are followed is:

So Option C is correct.

From statement 1, 2, and 7 we can gather the following information:

Now, as per statement 2 Tanya will be interviewed either on Tuesday or Thursday and Sachin will be interviewed on either Saturday or Sunday.

If Tanya is interviewed on Thursday and Sachin is interviewed on Saturday then Gayatri must be interviewed on Sunday since statement 5 says at least a one day gap is required between Mahima and Gayatri's interview. So, Abhinav will have to be interviewed on Tuesday. [Case 1]

Similarly, If Tanya is interviewed on Thursday and Sachin is interviewed on Sunday then Gayatri must be interviewed on Saturday since statement 5 says at least a one day gap is required between Mahima and Gayatri's interview. However, Gayatri is asked questions on Indian Bankruptcy Code (IBC) (from statement 6) while the person interviewed on Saturday is asked admin law (statement 1) so this case is not possible.

If Tanya is interviewed on Tuesday and Sachin on Sunday then Gayatri will have to be interviewed on Thursday since she is asked about IBC and not admin law.

From statement 4 we know that the ones wearing blazers must be on consecutive days apart from the weekend. Also, Digivijay does not wear a blazer (statement 1) so the ones wearing a blazer can either be on Monday and Tuesday or Thursday and Friday. From statement 3 we know that the ones carrying files are interviewed before Thursday, so on any two of the days among Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. 

Even if one of the days is Wednesday, at least one person must carry a file on Monday and Tuesday. So, the ones wearing a blazer must be on Thursday and Friday.

In Case 1, upon placing the information we get the following:

However, as per statement 8, this is not possible. So, this case can be eliminated.

Similarly we can eliminate other cases. The only possible way, all the conditions are followed is:

So Option A is correct.