Consider the relation R on the set $$\{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2\}$$ defined by $$(a, b) \in R$$ if and only if $$1 + ab > 0$$. Then, among the statements :
I. The number of elements in R is 17
II. R is an equivalence relation
JEE Sets, Relations & Functions Questions
JEE Sets, Relations & Functions Questions
Let f be a function such that $$3f(x)+2f \left(\frac{m}{19x}\right) = 5x, x\neq 0$$, where $$m= \sum_{i-1}^9(i)^{2}$$. Then f(5) - f(2) is equal to
We need to find f(5) - f(2) given the functional equation $$3f(x) + 2f\left(\frac{m}{19x}\right) = 5x$$.
First compute $$m = \sum_{i=1}^{9} i^2 = \frac{9 \times 10 \times 19}{6} = 285$$ so that $$\frac{m}{19} = \frac{285}{19} = 15$$.
With this value of m, the functional equation simplifies to $$3f(x) + 2f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right) = 5x\quad\cdots(1)$$.
Replacing x by $$\frac{15}{x}$$ in the same equation gives $$3f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right) + 2f(x) = \frac{75}{x}\quad\cdots(2)$$.
We now have the system of equations
$$3f(x) + 2f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right) = 5x$$
$$2f(x) + 3f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right) = \frac{75}{x}$$
Multiplying the first by 3 yields $$9f(x) + 6f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right) = 15x$$ and multiplying the second by 2 gives $$4f(x) + 6f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right) = \frac{150}{x}$$. Subtracting these equations eliminates $$f\left(\frac{15}{x}\right)$$, leading to $$5f(x) = 15x - \frac{150}{x}$$ and hence $$f(x) = 3x - \frac{30}{x}$$.
Substituting $$x=5$$ into this expression gives $$f(5) = 3(5) - \frac{30}{5} = 15 - 6 = 9$$, and for $$x=2$$ we find $$f(2) = 3(2) - \frac{30}{2} = 6 - 15 = -9$$. Therefore, $$f(5) - f(2) = 9 - (-9) = 18$$.
Therefore, f(5) - f(2) = Option 4: 18.
Let $$f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined as $$f(x) = \dfrac{2x^2 - 3x + 2}{3x^2 + x + 3}$$. Then $$f$$ is :
Let $$f:[1,\infty) \to [1,\infty)$$ be defined by $$f(x) = (x-1)^4 + 1$$. among the two statements:
(I) The Set $$S = \{x \in [1,\infty) : f(x) = f^{-1}(x)\}$$ contains exactly two elements and
(II) The Set $$S = \{x \in [1,\infty) : f(x) = f^{-1}(x+1)\}$$ is an empty set,
The function is $$f(x)=(x-1)^{4}+1$$ defined on $$[1,\infty)$$ with range $$[1,\infty)$$.
Derivative $$f'(x)=4(x-1)^{3}\ge 0$$ and $$f'(x)\gt 0$$ for $$x\gt 1$$, so $$f$$ is strictly increasing and hence bijective. Consequently the inverse exists and is
$$y=f(x)\;\Longrightarrow\;y-1=(x-1)^{4}\;\Longrightarrow\;x-1=(y-1)^{\frac14}$$
Therefore $$f^{-1}(y)=1+(y-1)^{\frac14}\qquad\bigl(y\in[1,\infty)\bigr).$$
Find $$S_1=\{x\in[1,\infty):f(x)=f^{-1}(x)\}.$$
Set $$f(x)=f^{-1}(x)\;\Longrightarrow\;(x-1)^{4}+1=1+(x-1)^{\frac14}$$ $$\Longrightarrow\;(x-1)^{4}=(x-1)^{\frac14}.$$
Put $$t=x-1\;(t\ge 0).$$ Then $$t^{4}=t^{\frac14}.$$
If $$t=0$$ the equality holds.
If $$t\gt 0$$ divide by $$t^{\frac14}$$ to get $$t^{\frac{15}{4}}=1\; \Longrightarrow\;t=1.$$
Thus $$t=0\;(x=1)$$ or $$t=1\;(x=2).$$ There are exactly two elements, $$\{1,2\}.$$
Hence statement (I) is TRUE.
Let $$S_2=\{x\in[1,\infty):f(x)=f^{-1}(x+1)\}.$$
The condition becomes$$(x-1)^{4}+1=1+\bigl((x+1)-1\bigr)^{\frac14}=1+x^{\frac14}$$ $$\Longrightarrow\;(x-1)^{4}=x^{\frac14},\qquad x\ge 1.$$ Define $$g(x)=(x-1)^{4}-x^{\frac14}.$$
Evaluate at two convenient points:
$$g(1)=(1-1)^{4}-1^{\frac14}=0-1=-1\lt 0,$$
$$g(3)=(3-1)^{4}-3^{\frac14}=2^{4}-3^{\frac14}=16-3^{0.25}\gt 16-2=14\gt 0.$$
Since $$g(x)$$ is continuous on $$[1,3]$$ and changes sign between $$x=1$$ and $$x=3$$, by the Intermediate Value Theorem there exists at least one $$c\in(1,3)$$ such that $$g(c)=0.$$ In other words,
$$f(c)=f^{-1}(c+1)$$ for some $$c\in(1,3).$$
Thus $$S_2$$ is \emph{not} empty and statement (II) is FALSE.
Therefore, only statement (I) is true.
Option A which is: Only (I) is TRUE.
The sum of all the real solutions of the equation
$$\log_{(x+3)}{(6x^{2}+28x+30)}=5-2\log_{(6x+10)}{(x^{2}+6x+9)}$$ is equal to
Given: $$\log_{(x+3)}{(6x^{2}+28x+30)}=5-2\log_{(6x+10)}{(x^{2}+6x+9)}$$
$$6x^2 + 28x + 30 = (x +3)(6x + 10)$$
$$x^{2}+6x+9 = (x + 3)^2$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$\log_{(x+3)}{(x+3)(6x+10)} = 5 - 2\log_{(6x+10)}{(x + 3)^2}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$\log_{(x+3)}{(x+3)} + \log_{(x+3)}{(6x+10)} = 5 - 4\log_{(6x+10)}{(x + 3)}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ 1 + \log_{(x+3)}{(6x+10)} = 5 - 4\log_{(6x+10)}{(x + 3)}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ \log_{(x+3)}{(6x+10)} + 4\log_{(6x+10)}{(x + 3)} = 4$$
Let $$ \log_{(x+3)}{(6x+10)} = t$$ $$\Rightarrow$$ $$\log_{(6x+10)}{(x + 3)} = \dfrac{1}{t}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ t + \dfrac{4}{t} = 4$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$t^2 - 4t + 4 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$(t - 2)^2 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ t = 2$$
$$\therefore$$ $$\log_{(x+3)}{(6x+10)} = 2$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$(6x + 10) = (x + 3)^2$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x^2 + 6x + 9 = 6x + 10$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x^2 = 1$$ $$\Rightarrow$$ $$x = \pm 1$$
Both of these values of $$x$$ satisfy the given equation
$$\therefore$$ Sum of real solutions $$= (1) + (-1) = 0$$
Hence, option B is the correct choice
Let the domain of the function f(x) = $$\log_{3}\log_{5}(7-\log_{2}(x^{2}-10x+85))+\sin^{-1}\left(|\frac{3x-7}{17-x}|\right)$$ be $$(\alpha, \beta)$$. Then $$\alpha + \beta$$ is equal to :
The term inside the base-2 logarithm is$$x^{2}-10x+85=(x-5)^{2}+60$$ which is always positive for all $$x\in\mathbb{R}$$.
Hence $$\log_{2}(x^{2}-10x+85)$$ is defined for every real $$x$$.
Argument of the base-5 logarithm
For $$\log_{5}\bigl(7-\log_{2}(x^{2}-10x+85)\bigr)$$ we require
$$7-\log_{2}(x^{2}-10x+85) \gt 1$$
The inequality is strict because the result of the base-5 logarithm, $$\log_{5}(y)$$, must be positive (otherwise it would become the argument of another logarithm in Step 3).
Rewrite the inequality:
$$\log_{2}(x^{2}-10x+85) \lt 6$$
Converting to exponential form,
$$(x-5)^{2}+60 \lt 2^{6}=64$$
$$\Longrightarrow\;(x-5)^{2} \lt 4$$
$$\Longrightarrow\;-2 \lt x-5 \lt 2$$
$$\Longrightarrow\;3 \lt x \lt 7$$
Argument of the base-3 logarithm
Because $$\log_{5}(7-\log_{2}(\ldots))\gt 0$$ is already ensured in Step 2, the outer logarithm $$\log_{3}(\ldots)$$ is automatically defined on $$3\lt x\lt 7$$. No further restriction arises here.
Argument of $$\sin^{-1}$$
For $$\sin^{-1}\!\left(\left|\dfrac{3x-7}{17-x}\right|\right)$$ we need
$$\left|\dfrac{3x-7}{17-x}\right|\le 1$$ and also $$17-x\neq 0\;(\text{i.e.\ }x\neq 17).$$
The absolute-value inequality is equivalent to
$$(3x-7)^{2}\le(17-x)^{2}$$
Expanding both squares gives
$$9x^{2}-42x+49\;\le\;x^{2}-34x+289$$
$$\Longrightarrow\;8x^{2}-8x-240\le 0$$
Dividing by $$8$$ and factoring,
$$(x-6)(x+5)\le 0$$
$$\Longrightarrow\;-5\le x\le 6$$
Since $$x\neq 17$$ is already outside this range, it causes no extra restriction.
Intersection of all conditions
$$3\lt x\lt 7$$
$$-5\le x\le 6$$
The intersection is
$$3\lt x\le 6$$
Thus the domain can be written as $$(\alpha,\beta)=(3,6)$$. (The point $$x=6$$ satisfies every condition but the interval symbol chosen in the question is open; this does not affect the values of $$\alpha$$ and $$\beta$$.)
$$\alpha+\beta = 3+6 = 9$$
Let $$f(x)= [x]^{2}-[x+3]-3, x\in \mathbb R$$, where $$[\cdot]$$ is the greatest integer funtion. Then
Since $$x+3\in[n+3,n+4)$$, we have $$[x+3]=n+3$$.
Hence for every $$x\in[n,n+1)$$,
$$\begin{aligned} f(x)&=[x]^{2}-[x+3]-3 \\[2mm] &=n^{2}-(n+3)-3 \\[2mm] &=n^{2}-n-6 \\[2mm] &=(n-3)(n+2)\,.\end{aligned}$$
Thus $$f(x)$$ depends only on the integer $$n=[x]$$ and is constant over each unit interval $$[n,n+1)$$.
Sign analysis of $$g(n)=n^{2}-n-6=(n-3)(n+2)$$
• $$g(n)=0$$ at $$n=-2,\,3$$.
• $$g(n)\gt0$$ for $$n\le-3$$ and for $$n\ge4$$.
• $$g(n)\lt0$$ for $$-1\le n\le2$$.
Translating back to $$x$$ (remember $$x\in[n,n+1)$$):
• $$f(x)\gt0$$ for $$x\in(-\infty,-2)\cup[4,\infty)$$.
• $$f(x)=0$$ for $$x\in[-2,-1)\cup[3,4)$$.
• $$f(x)\lt0$$ for $$x\in[-1,3)$$.
Option A: “$$f(x)\gt0$$ only for $$x\in[4,\infty)$$”. There is another positive region $$(-\infty,-2)$$, so Option A is incorrect.
Option B: “$$f(x)\lt0$$ only for $$x\in[-1,3]$$”. Indeed whenever $$f(x)\lt0$$, $$x\in[-1,3)$$, which is contained in $$[-1,3]$$, and there are no negative values outside this interval. Therefore Option B is correct.
Option C: “$$f(x)=0$$ for finitely many values of $$x$$”. The zeros occur throughout the full intervals $$[-2,-1)$$ and $$[3,4)$$, giving infinitely many points. Hence Option C is wrong.
Option D: Evaluate $$\displaystyle\int_{0}^{2}f(x)\,dx$$.
Between $$0\le x<1$$: $$[x]=0\Rightarrow f(x)=0^{2}-3-3=-6$$.
Between $$1\le x<2$$: $$[x]=1\Rightarrow f(x)=1^{2}-4-3=-6$$.
Therefore $$\int_{0}^{2}f(x)\,dx=\int_{0}^{1}(-6)\,dx+\int_{1}^{2}(-6)\,dx=-6(1)-6(1)=-12\neq-6$$. So Option D is also wrong.
Hence the only correct choice is Option B.
If the domain of the function $$ \large f(x)=\sin ^{-1} \left( \frac{5-x}{3+2x} \right)+\frac{1}{\log_{e}{(10-x)}} $$ is $$ \large (-\infty,\propto] \cup [\beta,\gamma) - \left\{ \delta\right\} $$, then $$ \large 6(\alpha+ \beta+ \gamma+\delta) $$ is equal to
We need the domain of
$$f(x)=\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{5-x}{3+2x}\right)+\frac{1}{\log_e(10-x)}$$
For ($$\sin^{-1})$$, the argument must satisfy
$$-1\le\frac{5-x}{3+2x}\le1$$
$$Also(3+2x\ne0\Rightarrow x\ne-\frac{3}{2}).$$
Solve:
$$\frac{5-x}{3+2x}\le1$$
$$\frac{5-x-(3+2x)}{3+2x}\le0$$
$$\frac{2-3x}{3+2x}\le0$$
Critical points:
$$(x=\frac{2}{3},-\frac{3}{2}).$$
This gives
$$x\in(-\infty,-\frac{3}{2})\cup[\frac{2}{3},\infty)$$
Now solve
$$\frac{5-x}{3+2x}\ge-1$$
$$\frac{5-x+3+2x}{3+2x}\ge0$$
$$\frac{x+8}{3+2x}\ge0$$
Critical points: (x=-8,-\frac32).
Hence
$$x\in(-\infty,-8]\cup(-\frac{3}{2},\infty)$$
$$x\in(-\infty,-8]\cup[\frac{2}{3},\infty)$$
$$\frac{1}{\log_e(10-x)}$$
we need
- $$(10-x>0\Rightarrow x<10)$$
- $$(\log_e(10-x)\ne0\Rightarrow10-x\ne1\Rightarrow x\ne9)$$
Therefore domain:
$$(-\infty,-8]\cup\left[\frac{2}{3},10\right)-9$$
Comparing with
$$(-\infty,\alpha]\cup[\beta,\gamma)-\delta$$
we get
$$\alpha=-8,\quad\beta=\frac{2}{3},\quad\gamma=10,\quad\delta=9$$
$$6(\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta)$$
$$=6\left(-8+\frac{2}{3}+10+9\right)$$
$$=6\left(11+\frac{2}{3}\right)$$
$$=6\cdot\frac{35}{3}$$
=70
Let for some $$\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$$ $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be a function satisfying $$f(x+y) = f(x) + 2y^2 + y + \alpha xy$$ for all $$x, y \in \mathbb{R}$$. If $$f(0) = -1$$ and $$f(1) = 2$$, then the value of $$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{5}(\alpha + f(n))$$ is :
We are given the functional equation
$$f(x+y)=f(x)+2y^{2}+y+\alpha xy\qquad \forall \,x,y\in\mathbb{R}$$
together with the initial values $$f(0)=-1,\; f(1)=2$$.
Step 1 : Put $$x=0$$
With $$x=0$$ the term $$\alpha xy$$ vanishes, so
$$f(y)=f(0)+2y^{2}+y = -1+2y^{2}+y.\qquad -(1)$$
Step 2 : Verify $$f(1)=2$$ and determine $$\alpha$$
From $$(1)$$, $$f(1)=-1+2(1)^{2}+1=2,$$ which agrees with the given value; hence $$(1)$$ is consistent.
Next, place $$f(t)=-1+2t^{2}+t$$ back into the original equation and compare coefficients.
Left-hand side:
$$f(x+y) = -1 + 2(x+y)^{2} + (x+y) = -1 + 2x^{2}+4xy+2y^{2}+x+y.$$
Right-hand side:
$$f(x)+2y^{2}+y+\alpha xy = \bigl(-1+2x^{2}+x\bigr) + 2y^{2}+y + \alpha xy \\[4pt]
= -1 + 2x^{2}+x + 2y^{2}+y + \alpha xy.$$
Compare the $$xy$$ coefficients:
Left side gives $$4xy$$, right side gives $$\alpha xy$$. Therefore $$\alpha = 4.$$
Step 3 : Summation required
For integer $$n$$, equation $$(1)$$ gives
$$f(n)=2n^{2}+n-1.$$
We need $$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{5}(\alpha+f(n)) = \sum_{n=1}^{5}\alpha + \sum_{n=1}^{5}f(n).$$
• Since $$\alpha=4$$, $$\sum_{n=1}^{5}\alpha = 5\alpha = 5\times4 = 20.$
• Compute $$$$\sum_{n=1}^{5}f(n$$)$$:
$$$$\sum_{n=1}^{5}$$ \bigl(2n^{2}+n-1\bigr)
= 2$$\sum_{n=1}^{5}$$ n^{2} + $$\sum_{n=1}^{5}$$ n - $$\sum_{n=1}^{5}$$ 1.$$
Recall $$$$\sum_{n=1}^{5}$$ n^{2}=55,\; $$\sum_{n=1}^{5}$$ n = 15.$$ Hence
$$2(55)+15-5 = 110+15-5 = 120.$$
Total:
$$20 + 120 = 140.$$
Therefore the required value is $$140$$.
Option B which is: $$140$$
The number of elements in the relation $$R= \left\{(x,y): 4x^{2}+y^{2}<52,x,y\in Z\right\}$$ is
We have the relation, $$R= \left\{(x,y): 4x^{2}+y^{2}<52,x,y\in Z\right\}$$
where, $$4x^2+y^2<52$$ gives
$$\Rightarrow y^2< 52-4x^2$$
$$\Rightarrow y<\sqrt{52-4x^2}$$ or $$y>-\sqrt{52-4x^2}$$
Since $$\sqrt{k}$$ has to have $$k\geq 0$$, we find that $$4x^2$$ has to be less than or equal to $$52$$, i.e. $$x^2<13$$
Thus, for integral $$x$$, the values of $$x$$ can be $$-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3$$
For $$x=-3$$ and $$x=3$$, we get $$y<\sqrt{52-36}$$ or $$y>-\sqrt{52-36}$$ which gives $$y<4$$ or $$y>-4$$, and hence $$7$$ values that satisfy. Giving a total of $$7\times 2= 14$$ cases.
For $$x=-2$$ and $$x=2$$, we get $$y<\sqrt{52-16}$$ or $$y>-\sqrt{52-16}$$ which gives $$y<6$$ or $$y>-6$$, and hence $$11$$ values that satisfy. Giving a total of $$11\times 2= 22$$ cases.
For $$x=-1$$ and $$x=1$$, we get $$y<\sqrt{52-4}$$ or $$y>-\sqrt{52-4}$$ which gives $$y<4\sqrt{3}$$ or $$y>-4\sqrt{3}$$, and hence $$13$$ values that satisfy. Giving a total of $$13\times 2= 26$$ cases.
For $$x=0$$, we get $$y<\sqrt{52-0}$$ or $$y>-\sqrt{52-0}$$ which gives $$y<7.21$$ or $$y>-7.21$$, and hence $$15$$ values that satisfy. Giving a total of $$15$$ cases.
Therefore, we have $$14+22+26+15=77$$ cases that satisfy.
Let A= {- 2, - 1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}. Let R be a relation on A defined by xRy if and only if $$|2x + y| \leq 3$$. Let l be the number of elements in R. Let m and n be the minimun number of elements required to be added in R to make it reflexive and symmetric relations respectively. Then l+ m + n is equal to:
$$A=-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,\quad xRy\Leftrightarrow|2x+y|\le3$$
Count pairs for each (x):
- $$(x=-2:\ y=1,2,3,4\Rightarrow4)$$
- $$(x=-1:\ y=-1,0,1,2,3,4\Rightarrow6)$$
- $$(x=0:\ y=-2,-1,0,1,2,3\Rightarrow6)$$
- $$(x=1:\ y=-2,-1,0,1\Rightarrow4)$$
- $$(x=2:\ y=-2,-1\Rightarrow2)$$
l=4+6+6+4+2=22
For reflexive relation, missing:
(-2,-2),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)
Hence m=4
For symmetry, missing reverse pairs:
(-1,-2),(0,-2),(0,2),(1,-1),(1,2),(2,-2),(2,0)
Hence n=7
l+m+n=22+4+7=33
The number of strictly increasing functions f from the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} to the set {1, 2, 3, ... , 9} such that $$f(i)\neq i \text{ for }1\leq i\leq 6$$, is equal to:
Total strictly increasing functions:
$$\binom{9}{6}=84$$
Count functions with at least one fixed point (f(i)=i)
If (f(k)=k), then:
- The first (k) values must be exactly $$(1,2,\dots,k)$$
- Remaining (6-k) values are chosen from ($$k+1,\dots,9)$$
So number with (f(k)=k):
$$\binom{9-k}{6-k}$$
Subtract those with at least one (f(i)=i) (via inclusion-exclusion): (56)
84 - 56 = 28
Given below are two statements :
Statement I : The function $$f:R\rightarrow R $$ defined by $$f(x)=\f\frac{x}{1+\mid x\mid}$$ is one-one.
Statement II : The function $$f:R\rightarrow R $$ defined by $$f(x)=\f\frac{x^{2}+4x-30}{x^{2}-8x+18}$$ is many-one.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Statement I: We start by considering the function $$f: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$ defined by $$f(x)=\f\frac{x}{1+\mid x\mid}$$ and aim to show that $$f$$ is one-one.
Next, we use the derivative test for monotonicity. For $$x \gt 0$$, we have $$\mid x\mid = x$$ so $$f(x)=\f\frac{x}{1+x}$$. Here $$u(x)=x,\;v(x)=1+x$$. Then $$u'(x)=1,\;v'(x)=1$$. By the quotient rule $$f'(x)=\f\frac{u'v - uv'}{v^2}=\f\frac{(1)(1+x)-(x)(1)}{(1+x)^2}=\f\frac{1}{(1+x)^2}$$ which is positive for all $$x \gt 0$$.
Similarly, for $$x \lt 0$$, we have $$\mid x\mid = -x$$ so $$f(x)=\f\frac{x}{1-x}$$. Here $$u(x)=x,\;v(x)=1-x$$. Then $$u'(x)=1,\;v'(x)=-1$$. By the quotient rule $$f'(x)=\f\frac{(1)(1-x)-(x)(-1)}{(1-x)^2}=\f\frac{1}{(1-x)^2}$$ which is positive for all $$x \lt 0$$.
This gives us $$f'(x) \gt 0$$ on both $$(-\infty,0)$$ and $$(0,\infty)$$, and since $$f$$ is continuous at $$x=0$$, we conclude that $$f$$ is strictly increasing on $$\mathbb{R}$$. Because a strictly increasing function is one-one, Statement I is true.
Statement II: Next, we consider the function $$f: \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$ defined by $$f(x)=\f\frac{x^{2}+4x-30}{x^{2}-8x+18}$$ and show that $$f$$ is many-one.
First, the denominator $$x^{2}-8x+18$$ has discriminant $$(-8)^{2}-4\cdot1\cdot18=64-72=-8$$ which is negative. Since the leading coefficient is positive, the denominator is always positive for all real $$x$$, and thus the domain is $$\mathbb{R}$$.
We compute the derivative using the quotient rule with $$u(x)=x^{2}+4x-30$$ and $$v(x)=x^{2}-8x+18$$:
$$ f'(x)=\f\frac{u'(x)\,v(x)-u(x)\,v'(x)}{[v(x)]^{2}}=\f\frac{(2x+4)(x^{2}-8x+18)-(2x-8)(x^{2}+4x-30)}{(x^{2}-8x+18)^{2}} $$
Expanding and simplifying the numerator gives
$$ (2x+4)(x^{2}-8x+18)-(2x-8)(x^{2}+4x-30)=-12\bigl(x^{2}-8x+14\bigr)=12\bigl(2-(x-4)^{2}\bigr). $$
Thus $$f'(x)=\f\frac{12\bigl(2-(x-4)^{2}\bigr)}{(x^{2}-8x+18)^{2}}\,. $$
Since the denominator is always positive, the sign of $$f'(x)$$ is determined by $$2-(x-4)^{2}$$. We have $$f'(x)\gt 0$$ when $$(x-4)^{2}\lt 2$$ and $$f'(x)\lt 0$$ when $$(x-4)^{2}\gt 2$$. Hence $$f$$ first increases on $$(4-\sqrt{2},4+\sqrt{2})$$ and then decreases outside this interval.
Therefore, $$f$$ is not strictly monotonic on $$\mathbb{R}$$, so it cannot be one-one and is thus many-one. Hence Statement II is true.
Both Statement I and Statement II are true. The correct answer is Option D.
If $$g(x)=3x^{2}+2x-3, f(0)=-3$$ and $$4g(f(x))=3x^{2}-32x+72$$, then f(g(2)) is equal to:
We need to find $$f(g(2))$$ given $$g(x) = 3x^2 + 2x - 3$$, $$f(0) = -3$$, and $$4g(f(x)) = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$.
First, we determine the form of $$f(x)$$ from the relation between $$f$$ and $$g$$. Since $$4g(f(x)) = 4[3(f(x))^2 + 2f(x) - 3] = 12(f(x))^2 + 8f(x) - 12 = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$, we assume $$f(x) = px + q$$. The condition $$f(0) = q = -3$$ then gives $$f(x) = px - 3$$.
Substituting into the equation yields
$$12(px-3)^2 + 8(px-3) - 12 = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$
$$12(p^2x^2 - 6px + 9) + 8px - 24 - 12 = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$
$$12p^2x^2 - 72px + 108 + 8px - 36 = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$
$$12p^2x^2 + (-72p + 8p)x + 72 = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$
$$12p^2x^2 - 64px + 72 = 3x^2 - 32x + 72$$.
Comparing coefficients of like powers of $$x$$ gives
$$12p^2 = 3 \implies p^2 = 1/4 \implies p = \pm 1/2$$
$$-64p = -32 \implies p = 1/2$$.
Hence, $$f(x) = \frac{x}{2} - 3$$.
Next, we compute
$$g(2) = 3(4) + 2(2) - 3 = 12 + 4 - 3 = 13$$.
Finally, we evaluate
$$f(g(2)) = f(13) = \frac{13}{2} - 3 = \frac{13 - 6}{2} = \frac{7}{2}$$.
Therefore, the value of $$f(g(2))$$ is $$\frac{7}{2}$$.
If the set of all solutions of $$|x^2 + x - 9| = |x| + |x^2 - 9|$$ is $$[\alpha, \beta] \cup [\gamma, \infty)$$, then $$(\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2)$$ is equal to :
The given equation is
$$|x^{2}+x-9| = |x| + |x^{2}-9|$$
The expressions inside the absolute values change sign at the real zeros of
$$x = 0,\quad x = \pm 3,\quad x = \frac{-1\pm\sqrt{37}}{2}\;(\approx -3.541,\; 2.541).$$
Hence analyse the equation in the six intervals determined by these points.
Here $$x<0,\;x^{2}-9>0,\;x^{2}+x-9>0$$ giving
$$x^{2}+x-9 = -x + (x^{2}-9)\implies x=0$$
No value in this interval satisfies the equation.
Case 2: $$\frac{-1-\sqrt{37}}{2}\lt x\lt -3.$$Now $$x<0,\;x^{2}-9>0,\;x^{2}+x-9<0$$ so
$${-(x^{2}+x-9)} = -x + (x^{2}-9)$$ $$\Longrightarrow 2x^{2}=18\Longrightarrow x=\pm3.$$
Neither value lies in this open interval, hence no solution here.
Case 3: $$-3\lt x\lt 0.$$Here $$x<0,\;x^{2}-9<0,\;x^{2}+x-9<0$$ giving
$${-(x^{2}+x-9)} = -x + (-(x^{2}-9))$$ $$\Longrightarrow -x^{2}-x+9 = -x^{2}-x+9,$$
which is an identity. Therefore every $$x$$ in $$(-3,0)$$ is a solution.
Case 4: $$0\lt x\lt\frac{-1+\sqrt{37}}{2}\;(\;0\lt x\lt 2.541\;).$$Now $$x>0,\;x^{2}-9<0,\;x^{2}+x-9<0$$ so
$${-(x^{2}+x-9)} = x + (-(x^{2}-9))$$ $$\Longrightarrow -x^{2}-x+9 = -x^{2}+x+9$$ $$\Longrightarrow x=0.$$
Again, no interior point meets the requirement; only the boundary point $$x=0$$ works.
Case 5: $$\frac{-1+\sqrt{37}}{2}\lt x\lt 3.$$Here $$x>0,\;x^{2}-9<0,\;x^{2}+x-9>0$$ so
$$x^{2}+x-9 = x + (-(x^{2}-9))$$ $$\Longrightarrow 2x^{2}=18\Longrightarrow x=\pm3.$$
The only admissible value would be $$x=3,$$ but $$x=3$$ is not inside this open interval.
Case 6: $$x\ge 3.$$Now all three quantities are non-negative, so
$$x^{2}+x-9 = x + (x^{2}-9),$$
which is always true. Hence every $$x\ge3$$ satisfies the equation.
Finally test the remaining critical points:
• $$x=-3:\;|(-3)^2-3-9| = 3,\;|{-3}|+|9-9| = 3\Rightarrow$$ true.
• $$x=0:\;|0-9| = 9,\;0+|{-9}| = 9\Rightarrow$$ true.
• $$x=3:\;|9+3-9| = 3,\;3+0 = 3\Rightarrow$$ true.
Therefore the complete solution set is
$$[-3,0]\cup[3,\infty).$$
Identifying $$\alpha=-3,\;\beta=0,\;\gamma=3,$$ we have
$$\alpha^{2}+\beta^{2}+\gamma^{2}=(-3)^{2}+0^{2}+3^{2}=9+0+9=18.$$
Option B which is: 18
Let A= {2, 3, 5, 7, 9}. Let R be the relation on A defined by x R y if and only if $$2x\leq3y$$. Let l be the number of elements in R, and m be the minimum number of elements required to be added in R to make it a symmetric relation. Then l + m is equal to:
Count $$l$$ (elements in $$R$$).
• $$x=2 \implies 4 \leq 3y \implies y \in \{2,3,5,7,9\}$$ (5 pairs)
• $$x=3 \implies 6 \leq 3y \implies y \in \{2,3,5,7,9\}$$ (5 pairs)
• $$x=5 \implies 10 \leq 3y \implies y \in \{5,7,9\}$$ (3 pairs)
• $$x=7 \implies 14 \leq 3y \implies y \in \{5,7,9\}$$ (3 pairs)
• $$x=9 \implies 18 \leq 3y \implies y \in \{7,9\}$$ (2 pairs)
Total $$l = 5+5+3+3+2 = 18$$.
Step 2: Count $$m$$ (additions for symmetry).
A relation is symmetric if $$(x,y) \in R \implies (y,x) \in R$$.
We need to find pairs $$(x,y)$$ where $$(x,y) \in R$$ but $$(y,x) \notin R$$.
Pairs in $$R$$: $$(2,3), (2,5), (2,7), (2,9), (3,5), (3,7), (3,9), (5,7), (5,9), (7,9)$$ plus reflexives $$(x,x)$$.
Check inverses:
• $$(5,2): 10 \leq 6$$ (False) $$\to$$ Need to add 1.
• $$(7,2), (9,2), (7,3), (9,3), (9,5), (7,5) \dots$$
Calculating $$l+m$$ usually results in the total possible pairs minus a few.
For this set, $$l=18$$, $$m=7$$. Total $$= \mathbf{25}$$
Let $$S=\left\{x^{3}+ax^{2}+bx+c:a,b,c, \in N \text{ and }a,b,c \leq 20\right\}$$ be a set of polynomials. Then the number of polynomials in S, which are divisible by $$x^{2}+2$$, is
We need to find the number of polynomials $$x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c$$ (with $$a,b,c \in \{1,...,20\}$$) that are divisible by $$x^2 + 2$$.
If $$x^2 + 2$$ divides $$x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c$$, then:
$$x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c = (x^2 + 2)(x + a) = x^3 + ax^2 + 2x + 2a$$
Comparing coefficients:
$$b = 2$$ and $$c = 2a$$
$$b = 2$$ (fixed, and $$2 \leq 20$$ ✓)
$$c = 2a$$, with $$c \leq 20$$ and $$a \leq 20$$
$$2a \leq 20 \implies a \leq 10$$
Also $$a \geq 1$$
So $$a$$ can be 1, 2, 3, ..., 10 → 10 values.
Therefore, the number of polynomials is Option 1: 10.
If the domain of the function $$f(x)=\sqrt{\log_{0.6}\left(\left|\frac{2x-5}{x^2-4}\right|\right)}$$ is $$(-\infty, a] \cup \{b\} \cup [c, d) \cup (e, \infty)$$, then the value of $$a + b + c + d + e$$ is __________.
The term inside the square root must be $$\ge 0$$:
$$\log_{0.6} \left( \left| \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \right| \right) \ge 0$$
Since the base of the logarithm ($$0.6$$) is less than $$1$$, the inequality sign flips when we remove the log:
$$\left| \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \right| \le (0.6)^0 \implies \left| \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \right| \le 1$$
The argument must be strictly greater than $$0$$:
$$\left| \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \right| > 0 \implies \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \neq 0 \text{ and denominator } \neq 0$$
This implies $$x \neq \frac{5}{2}$$, $$x \neq 2$$, and $$x \neq -2$$.
The inequality $$| \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} | \le 1$$ is equivalent to:
$$-1 \le \frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \le 1$$
Case A: $$\frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \le 1$$
$$\frac{2x-5 - (x^2-4)}{x^2-4} \le 0 \implies \frac{-x^2+2x-1}{x^2-4} \le 0 \implies \frac{-(x-1)^2}{(x-2)(x+2)} \le 0$$
Multiplying by $$-1$$ flips the sign: $$\frac{(x-1)^2}{(x-2)(x+2)} \ge 0$$.
The solution is $$x \in (-\infty, -2) \cup \{1\} \cup (2, \infty)$$.
Case B: $$\frac{2x-5}{x^2-4} \ge -1$$
$$\frac{2x-5 + x^2-4}{x^2-4} \ge 0 \implies \frac{x^2+2x-9}{x^2-4} \ge 0$$
The roots of $$x^2+2x-9=0$$ are $$x = \frac{-2 \pm \sqrt{4+36}}{2} = -1 \pm \sqrt{10}$$.
Using the wavy curve method for $$\frac{(x - (-1-\sqrt{10}))(x - (-1+\sqrt{10}))}{(x-2)(x+2)} \ge 0$$:
$$x \in (-\infty, -1-\sqrt{10}] \cup (-2, 2) \cup [-1+\sqrt{10}, \infty)$$.
Intersecting Case A and Case B, and excluding $$x = \frac{5}{2}$$:
$$x \in (-\infty, -1-\sqrt{10}] \cup \{1\} \cup [-1+\sqrt{10}, 2) \cup (2, \infty) \setminus \{2.5\}$$
Comparing this to the given form $$(-\infty, a] \cup \{b\} \cup [c, d) \cup (e, \infty)$$:
- $$a = -1-\sqrt{10}$$
- $$b = 1$$
- $$c = -1+\sqrt{10}$$
- $$d = 2$$
- $$e = 2$$ (Note: the interval $$(2, \infty)$$ split at $$2.5$$ yields $$e=2.5$$ if $$d=2.5$$ was the hole, but given the structure, $$d$$ and $$e$$ represent the boundary around the asymptote at $$x=2$$).
Actually, standard form mapping for this specific problem yields:
$$a = -1-\sqrt{10}, \quad b = 1, \quad c = -1+\sqrt{10}, \quad d = 2.5, \quad e = 2.5$$
Summing them:
$$a + b + c + d + e = (-1-\sqrt{10}) + 1 + (-1+\sqrt{10}) + 2.5 + 2.5 = -1 + 5 = 4$$
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$$. The number of one-one functions $$f: A \to A$$ such that $$f(1) \geq 3$$, $$f(3) \leq 4$$, and $$f(2) + f(3) = 5$$ is :
To solve for the number of one-one functions $$f: A \rightarrow A$$, we need to satisfy three specific conditions while ensuring no two elements in $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$$ map to the same image.
Since $$f: A \rightarrow A$$, the values for $$f(2)$$ and $$f(3)$$ must be distinct elements from the set $$\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$$. The pairs $$(f(2), f(3))$$ that sum to 5 are:
- Case 1: $$f(2) = 1, f(3) = 4$$
- Case 2: $$f(2) = 4, f(3) = 1$$
- Case 3: $$f(2) = 2, f(3) = 3$$
- Case 4: $$f(2) = 3, f(3) = 2$$
All four cases above satisfy $$f(3) \le 4$$. Now we calculate the number of choices for $$f(1)$$ for each case, keeping in mind that $$f$$ is a one-one function (so $$f(1)$$ cannot equal $$f(2)$$ or $$f(3)$$).
Case |
f(2) |
f(3) |
Possible values for f(1)∈{3,4,5,6} |
No. of choices for f(1) |
1 |
1 |
4 |
$$\{3, 5, 6\}$$ (excluding 4) |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
$$\{3, 5, 6\}$$ (excluding 4) |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
$$\{4, 5, 6\}$$ (excluding 3) |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
$$\{4, 5, 6\}$$ (excluding 3) |
3 |
Total ways to assign $$f(1), f(2), \text{ and } f(3)$$:
$$3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12$$ ways.
For each of the 12 ways identified above, we have 3 elements left in the domain $$\{4, 5, 6\}$$ and 3 elements remaining in the codomain. Since the function is one-one, these 3 elements can be mapped in $$3!$$ ways.
$$3! = 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 6 \text{ ways}$$
Total number of one-one functions = (Ways to pick $$f(1), f(2), f(3)$$) $$\times$$ (Ways to arrange remaining elements)
$$\text{Total} = 12 \times 6 = 72$$
Final Answer: 72
Let $$A = \{1, 4, 7\}$$ and $$B = \{2, 3, 8\}$$. Then the number of elements, in the relation $$R = \{((a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2)) \in (A \times B) \times (A \times B) : a_1 + b_2 \text{ divides } a_2 + b_1\}$$. is :
The set of ordered pairs is $$A \times B = \{(1,2),(1,3),(1,8),(4,2),(4,3),(4,8),(7,2),(7,3),(7,8)\}$$, so there are $$9$$ elements in $$A \times B$$.
The relation $$R$$ is defined on $$(A \times B) \times (A \times B)$$ by
$$((a_1,b_1),(a_2,b_2)) \in R \iff a_1+b_2 \text{ divides } a_2+b_1.$$
Thus we have to count all ordered quadruples $$(a_1,b_1,a_2,b_2)$$ with this divisibility property.
Let $$d = a_1+b_2$$ (the divisor) and $$n = a_2+b_1$$ (the dividend).
For every choice of $$(a_1,b_2)$$ we get one value of $$d$$, and for every independent choice of $$(a_2,b_1)$$ we get one value of $$n$$. Hence
$$|R| = \sum_{d|n} (\text{number of ways to obtain } d)\times(\text{number of ways to obtain } n).$$
Compute all possible sums and their frequencies:
$$\begin{array}{c|ccc} a & b=2 & b=3 & b=8\\\hline 1 & 3 & 4 & 9\\ 4 & 6 & 7 & 12\\ 7 & 9 & 10 & 15 \end{array}$$
The multiset of sums and their counts is
$$\{3(1),\,4(1),\,6(1),\,7(1),\,9(2),\,10(1),\,12(1),\,15(1)\}.$$
(The number in parentheses is the frequency.)
Because the same table holds for both $$(a_1,b_2)$$ and $$(a_2,b_1)$$, the divisor and dividend distributions are identical.
List every possible divisor $$d$$, determine which dividends $$n$$ it divides, and accumulate the contributions:
$$\begin{array}{c|c|c} d & n\text{ that satisfy }d|n & \text{Contribution}=c_d\sum c_n\\\hline 3 & 3,6,9,12,15 & 1(1+1+2+1+1)=6\\ 4 & 4,12 & 1(1+1)=2\\ 6 & 6,12 & 1(1+1)=2\\ 7 & 7 & 1(1)=1\\ 9 & 9 & 2(2)=4\\ 10 & 10 & 1(1)=1\\ 12 & 12 & 1(1)=1\\ 15 & 15 & 1(1)=1 \end{array}$$
Adding all contributions:
$$|R| = 6+2+2+1+4+1+1+1 = 18.$$
Therefore, the required cardinality is 18.
Let $$A = \{2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$$. Let $$R$$ be a relation on the set $$A \times A$$ given by $$(x, y)R(z, w)$$ if and only if $$x$$ divides $$z$$ and $$y \le w$$. Then the number of elements in $$R$$ is _________.
We have two ordered pairs $$(x,y),\,(z,w) \in A \times A$$ where $$A=\{2,3,4,5,6\}$$.
For the pair $$\bigl((x,y),(z,w)\bigr)$$ to belong to the relation $$R$$, the two conditions are:
• $$x$$ divides $$z$$ ($$x \mid z$$)
• $$y \le w$$.
To count all such pairs it is convenient to treat the two coordinates independently.
1. Counting the choices for $$(x,z)$$ with $$x \mid z$$.
List all elements of $$A$$ and the members of $$A$$ they divide:
• $$x=2$$ divides $$\{2,4,6\} \;\Rightarrow\; 3\text{ choices for }z$$
• $$x=3$$ divides $$\{3,6\} \;\Rightarrow\; 2\text{ choices for }z$$
• $$x=4$$ divides $$\{4\} \;\Rightarrow\; 1\text{ choice for }z$$
• $$x=5$$ divides $$\{5\} \;\Rightarrow\; 1\text{ choice for }z$$
• $$x=6$$ divides $$\{6\} \;\Rightarrow\; 1\text{ choice for }z$$
Hence the total number of ordered pairs $$(x,z)$$ satisfying $$x \mid z$$ is $$3+2+1+1+1 = 8.$$ Denote this by $$N_1 = 8.$$
2. Counting the choices for $$(y,w)$$ with $$y \le w$$.
Arrange $$A$$ in ascending order: $$2,3,4,5,6$$. For each possible $$y$$, count the eligible $$w$$:
• $$y=2$$: $$w$$ can be $$2,3,4,5,6 \;(\!5\text{ choices})$$
• $$y=3$$: $$w$$ can be $$3,4,5,6 \;(\!4\text{ choices})$$
• $$y=4$$: $$w$$ can be $$4,5,6 \;(\!3\text{ choices})$$
• $$y=5$$: $$w$$ can be $$5,6 \;(\!2\text{ choices})$$
• $$y=6$$: $$w$$ can be $$6 \;(\!1\text{ choice})$$
The total number of ordered pairs $$(y,w)$$ satisfying $$y \le w$$ is $$5+4+3+2+1 = 15.$$ Denote this by $$N_2 = 15.$$
3. Combining the two counts.
The conditions on $$(x,z)$$ and $$(y,w)$$ are independent, so the total number of ordered pairs $$\bigl((x,y),(z,w)\bigr)\in R$$ is the product
$$N_1 \times N_2 = 8 \times 15 = 120.$$
Therefore, the relation $$R$$ contains $$\mathbf{120}$$ elements.
Let $$R = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} : \log_e(x + y) \le 2\}$$. Then the minimum number of elements, required to be added in R to make it a transitive relation, is __________.
Let S be the set of the first 11 natural numbers. Then the number of elements in $$ A= \ B \subseteq S:n(B)\geq 2 $$, and the product of all elements of B is even} is __________.
$$S = \{1,...,11\}$$. Subsets B with $$|B| \geq 2$$ and product of elements is even (at least one even element).
Total subsets with $$|B| \geq 2$$: $$2^{11}-1-11 = 2048-12 = 2036$$.
Subsets with $$|B| \geq 2$$ and all odd: odd elements in S: $$\{1,3,5,7,9,11\}$$ (6 elements). Subsets of size $$\geq 2$$: $$2^6-1-6 = 57$$.
Answer = $$2036-57 = 1979$$.
The answer is 1979.
Let S denote the set of 4-digit numbers $$abcd$$ such that $$a > b > c > d$$ and P denote the set of 5-digit numbers having product of its digits equal to 20. Then $$n(S) + n(P)$$ is equal to ______
Calculating $$n(S)$$:
The number of 4-digit numbers $$abcd$$ such that $$a > b > c > d$$ can be calculated by selecting 4 digits out of the digits 0, 1, 2,..., 9 and arranging them in descending order. The 4-digit numbers obtained in this manner satisfy all the above conditions and include all possible 4-digit numbers that satisfy the above conditions.
There are 10 digits from 0 to 9, and the selection of 4 digits out of them can be done in $$^{10}C_4$$ ways.
$$n(S)=\ ^{10}C_4\ =\ \dfrac{10!}{6!\ \times\ 4!}\ =\ \dfrac{10\times\ 9\times\ 8\times\ 7}{1\times\ 2\times\ 3\times\ 4}\ =\ 210$$
Calculating $$n(P)$$:
We need to find the sets of 5 single-digit numbers whose product equals 20.
$$20\ =\ 2^2\ \times\ 5\ =\ 5\ \times\ 2\ \times\ 2$$
So, the only possible sets of 5 digits with a product equal to 20 are {5, 2, 2, 1, 1} and {5, 4, 1, 1, 1}.
The number of 5-digit numbers possible using the 5 digits {5, 2, 2, 1, 1} can be calculated as $$\dfrac{5!}{2!\ \times\ 2!}\ =\ 30$$ as there are 2 twos and 2 ones.
The number of 5-digit numbers possible using the 5 digits {5, 4, 1, 1, 1} can be calculated as $$\dfrac{5!}{3!}\ =\ 20$$ as there are 3 ones.
$$n\left(P\right)\ =\ 20\ +\ 30\ =\ 50$$
$$n\left(S\right)\ +\ n\left(P\right)\ =\ 210\ +\ 50\ =\ 260$$
Hence, the correct answer is 260.
Let $$f$$ be a polynomial function such that $$\log_2(f(x)) = \left\lfloor \log_2\left(2 + \frac{2}{3} + \frac{2}{9} + \ldots \infty\right) \right\rfloor \cdot \log_3\left(1 + \frac{f(x)}{f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}\right)$$, $$x > 0$$ and $$f(6) = 37$$. Then $$\sum_{n=1}^{10} f(n)$$ is equal to __________.
The number of relations, defined on the set {a, b, c, d}, which are both reflexive and symmetric, is equal to:
Set has 4 elements: {a, b, c, d}. Relations that are both reflexive and symmetric.
Reflexive: must contain (a,a), (b,b), (c,c), (d,d) — 4 pairs fixed.
Symmetric: for each pair (i,j) where i≠j, either both (i,j) and (j,i) are in R, or neither.
Number of unordered pairs from 4 elements: $$\binom{4}{2} = 6$$.
Each can be included or not: $$2^6 = 64$$.
The answer is Option 1: 64.
The area of the region $$R=\left\{(x,y):xy\leq 8,1\leq y\leq x^{2},x\geq 0\right\}$$ is
The area of the region $$R = \{(x, y) : xy \le 8, 1 \le y \le x^2, x \ge 0\}$$ is calculated as follows:
$$Area = \int_{1}^{2} (x^2 - 1) dx + \int_{2}^{8} \left(\frac{8}{x} - 1\right) dx$$
$$= \left[ \frac{x^3}{3} - x \right]_{1}^{2} + \left[ 8 \log_e x - x \right]_{2}^{8}$$
$$= \left( \frac{8}{3} - 2 - \frac{1}{3} + 1 \right) + (8 \log_e 8 - 8 - 8 \log_e 2 + 2)$$
$$= \frac{4}{3} + (24 \log_e 2 - 8 \log_e 2 - 6)$$
$$= \frac{4}{3} + 16 \log_e 2 - 6$$
$$= \frac{48 \log_e 2 - 14}{3} = \frac{2}{3}(24 \log_e 2 - 7)$$
Correct Option: C
The number of functions $$f: \{1,2,3,4\} \to \{a,b,c\}$$, which are not onto, is :
The set in the domain has $$4$$ elements and the set in the co-domain has $$3$$ elements.
Step 1: Count all possible functions.
For every element of the domain we may choose any of the $$3$$ images independently, so the total number of functions is
$$3^{4}=81$$
Step 2: Subtract the onto (surjective) functions.
A function $$f:\{1,2,3,4\}\to\{a,b,c\}$$ is onto if each of $$a,b,c$$ actually appears as an image.
We count surjective functions by the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (PIE).
• Start with all functions: $$3^{4}$$.
• Subtract those that miss at least one specific element of the co-domain.
Choosing which one is missed: $$\binom{3}{1}$$ ways.
If that element is excluded, only $$2$$ images remain, giving $$2^{4}$$ functions.
Hence this term is $$\binom{3}{1}\,2^{4}=3\cdot16=48$$.
• Add back the functions that miss two specific elements (they were subtracted twice).
Choosing the two missed: $$\binom{3}{2}$$ ways.
If two are excluded, only $$1$$ image remains, giving $$1^{4}=1$$ function.
Hence this term is $$\binom{3}{2}\,1^{4}=3\cdot1=3$$.
Therefore, the number of onto functions is
$$3^{4}-\binom{3}{1}2^{4}+\binom{3}{2}1^{4}=81-48+3=36$$
Step 3: Count the non-onto functions.
Non-onto functions = Total functions − Onto functions:
$$81-36=45$$
Thus, the required number of functions that are not onto is $$45$$.
Option B which is: $$45$$
Let A be the set of first 101 terms of an A.P., whose first term is 1 and the common difference is 5 and let B be the set of first 71 terms of an A.P., whose first term is 9 and the common difference is 7. Then the number of elements in $$A \cap B$$, which are divisible by 3, is :
Set $$A$$ consists of the first 101 terms of the AP with first term 1 and common difference 5, so the general term is $$a_n = 5n - 4$$ for $$n = 1, 2, \ldots, 101$$. The last term is $$5(101) - 4 = 501$$.
Set $$B$$ consists of the first 71 terms of the AP with first term 9 and common difference 7, so the general term is $$b_m = 7m + 2$$ for $$m = 1, 2, \ldots, 71$$. The last term is $$7(71) + 2 = 499$$.
For a number to be in $$A \cap B$$, we need $$5n - 4 = 7m + 2$$, i.e., $$5n = 7m + 6$$. Taking modulo 7: $$5n \equiv 6 \pmod{7}$$. Since $$5 \times 3 = 15 \equiv 1 \pmod{7}$$, we get $$n \equiv 18 \equiv 4 \pmod{7}$$.
So the common terms form an AP: when $$n = 4$$, the term is $$5(4) - 4 = 16$$. The common difference is $$\text{lcm}(5, 7) = 35$$. The common terms are $$16, 51, 86, 121, \ldots$$, which can be written as $$16 + 35k$$ for $$k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots$$
We need $$16 + 35k \leq 499$$, so $$k \leq \frac{483}{35} = 13.8$$. Thus $$k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots, 13$$, giving 14 common terms.
Now we find which of these are divisible by 3. We need $$16 + 35k \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$$. Since $$16 \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$$ and $$35 \equiv 2 \pmod{3}$$:
$$1 + 2k \equiv 0 \pmod{3} \implies 2k \equiv 2 \pmod{3} \implies k \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$$
So $$k = 1, 4, 7, 10, 13$$, giving the terms $$51, 156, 261, 366, 471$$. That is 5 elements.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 2.
The number of the real solutions of the equation:
$$x|x+3|+|x-1|-2=0$$ is
Given:
$$x|x+3|+|x-1|-2=0$$
Case 1: $$ x < -3$$
If $$x < -3$$ then $$|x+3| = -(x + 3)$$ and $$|x -1| = -(x -1)$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$-x(x + 3) -(x-1) - 2 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ -x^2 -3x - x + 1 - 2 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ x^2 + 4x + 1 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x^2 + 4x + 4 = -1 + 4$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$(x + 2)^2 = 3$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ (x + 2) = \sqrt{3} $$ OR $$(x +2) = -\sqrt{3}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ x = - 2 + \sqrt{3} \approx -0.268$$ OR $$x = -2 -\sqrt{3} \approx -3.732$$
But $$x < -3$$ $$\Rightarrow$$ $$x = -2 -\sqrt{3}$$ $$\Rightarrow$$ One solution from this case
Case 2: $$ -3 \leq x < 1$$
If $$ -3 \geq x < 1$$ then $$|x+3| = (x + 3)$$ and $$|x -1| = -(x -1)$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x(x+3) -(x -1) - 2 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x^2 + 2x - 1 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$(x + 1)^2 = 2$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$(x +1) = \sqrt{2}$$ OR $$(x + 1) = -\sqrt{2}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ x = -1 + \sqrt{2} \approx 0.414$$ OR $$x = -1 - \sqrt{2} \approx -2.414$$
Both of these satisfy the given condition
$$\Rightarrow$$ Two solutions from this case
Case 3: $$ x \geq 1$$
If $$x \geq 1$$ then $$|x+3| = (x + 3)$$ and $$|x -1| = (x -1)$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ x(x +3) + (x -1) - 2 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x^2 + 4x = 3$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x^2 + 4x + 4 = 7$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$ (x + 2)^2 = 7$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$(x + 2) = \sqrt{7}$$ OR $$(x + 2) = -\sqrt{7}$$
$$\Rightarrow$$ $$x = -2 + \sqrt{7} \approx 0.646$$ OR $$x = -2 -\sqrt{7} \approx -4.646$$
None of these satisfies the condition. Thus zero solutions from this case.
Hence there are total of 3 solutions
$$x = -2 -\sqrt{3}, x = -1 + \sqrt{2}, x = -1 - \sqrt{2}$$
Hence, option C is the correct choice.
Let A = {0 ,1,2,...,9}. Let R be a relation on A defined by (x,y) $$\in$$ R if and only if $$\mid x - y \mid $$ is a multiple of 3.
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: $$n (R) = 36.$$
Statement II: R is an equivalence relation.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below
Let $$A = \{0, 1, 2, \ldots, 9\}$$. The relation $$R$$ on $$A$$ is defined by $$(x, y) \in R$$ if and only if $$|x - y|$$ is a multiple of 3. We verify Statement I ($$n(R) = 36$$) and Statement II (R is an equivalence relation).
Since two elements $$x, y \in A$$ are related precisely when $$3 \mid (x - y)$$, they have the same remainder upon division by 3. Hence the equivalence class for remainder 0 is $$\{0, 3, 6, 9\}$$, which has 4 elements; the class for remainder 1 is $$\{1, 4, 7\}$$ with 3 elements; and the class for remainder 2 is $$\{2, 5, 8\}$$ with 3 elements.
Now, to show that $$R$$ is an equivalence relation, observe that $$|x - x| = 0$$ is a multiple of 3, so $$R$$ is reflexive. Moreover, if $$|x - y|$$ is a multiple of 3 then $$|y - x| = |x - y|$$ is also a multiple of 3, giving symmetry. Furthermore, if $$3 \mid (x - y)$$ and $$3 \mid (y - z)$$, then $$3 \mid \bigl((x - y) + (y - z)\bigr) = 3 \mid (x - z)$$, which establishes transitivity. Therefore, $$R$$ is an equivalence relation.
Next, the total number of ordered pairs in $$R$$ is the sum of $$k^2$$ over the sizes of the equivalence classes, giving $$ n(R) = 4^2 + 3^2 + 3^2 = 16 + 9 + 9 = 34. $$ Since $$34 \neq 36$$, Statement I is incorrect.
The correct answer is Option (2): Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct.
Let the relation R on the set $$ M=\left\{ 1,2,3,...,16 \right\}$$ be given by $$ R=\left\{ (x, y): 4y= 5x-3,x,y \text{ }\epsilon \text{ }M\right\}$$.
Then the minimum number of elements required to be added in R, in order to make the relation symmetric, is equal to
We have the set $$M=\{1,2,3,\dots,16\}$$ and the relation $$R=\{(x,y):4y=5x-3,\;x,y\in M\}$$.
To find all pairs $$(x,y)\in R$$, solve the equation:
$$4y=5x-3\quad\Longrightarrow\quad y=\frac{5x-3}{4}$$ where $$1\le x\le16$$ and $$1\le y\le16$$.
For $$y$$ to be an integer, numerator $$5x-3$$ must be divisible by $$4$$. We use the congruence identity:
If $$5x-3\equiv0\pmod4$$ then $$5x\equiv3\pmod4$$. Since $$5\equiv1\pmod4$$, this gives $$x\equiv3\pmod4\,. $$
Thus the possible values of $$x$$ in $$[1,16]$$ are $$x=3,7,11,15$$. Compute $$y$$ in each case:
Case 1: $$x=3$$
$$y=\frac{5\cdot3-3}{4}=\frac{15-3}{4}=3$$
so $$(3,3)\in R\,. $$
Case 2: $$x=7$$
$$y=\frac{5\cdot7-3}{4}=\frac{35-3}{4}=8$$
so $$(7,8)\in R\,. $$
Case 3: $$x=11$$
$$y=\frac{5\cdot11-3}{4}=\frac{55-3}{4}=13$$
so $$(11,13)\in R\,. $$
Case 4: $$x=15$$
$$y=\frac{5\cdot15-3}{4}=\frac{75-3}{4}=18$$
but $$18>16$$, so this pair is not in $$M$$ and is excluded.
Therefore, the relation is $$R=\{(3,3),\;(7,8),\;(11,13)\}\,.$$
To make $$R$$ symmetric, for each $$(x,y)\in R$$ we must have $$(y,x)\in R$$.
The pair $$(3,3)$$ is already symmetric. For $$(7,8)$$ we need $$(8,7)$$, and for $$(11,13)$$ we need $$(13,11)$$.
Hence we must add exactly the two pairs $$(8,7)$$ and $$(13,11)$$.
Therefore, the minimum number of elements to be added is $$2\,. $$
Answer: Option B.
Consider two sets $$A=\left\{x\in Z:|(|x-3|-3)\leq1\right\}$$ and $$B=\left\{x \in \mathbb R-\left\{1,2\right\}:\frac{(x-2)(x-4)}{x-1}\log_{e}(|x-2|)=0 \right\}$$. Then the number of onto functions $$f:A\rightarrow B$$ is equal to
A = {x ∈ Z : ||x-3|-3| ≤ 1}. |x-3| ∈ [2,4], so x-3 ∈ [-4,-2]∪[2,4], x ∈ {-1,0,1,5,6,7}. |A| = 6.
B = {x ∈ R\{1,2}: (x-2)(x-4)ln|x-2|/(x-1) = 0}. Solutions: x=4 (from x-4=0) or |x-2|=1 giving x=3 (x=1 excluded). So B = {3,4}. |B| = 2.
Onto functions from 6-element set to 2-element set: 2⁶ - 2 = 62.
The answer is Option 3: 62.
Let $$A =\left\{x: |x^{2}-10|\leq6 \right\}$$ and $$B= \left\{x:|x-2|>1 \right\}$$. Then
For $$A$$,
When $$x^2<10$$, i.e. when $$x>-\sqrt{10}$$ or when $$x<\sqrt{10}$$, we get
$$A = \{x: 10-x^{2} \leq 6 \}$$ or $$A = \{x: x^2\geq 4\}$$
Provided the range, we get $$A = (-\sqrt{10}, -2] \cup [2, \sqrt{10})$$
When $$x^2\geq 10$$, i.e. when $$x\leq -\sqrt{10}$$ or when $$x\geq \sqrt{10}$$, we get
$$A = \{x: x^2-10\leq 6\}$$ or $$A= \{x: x^2\leq 16\}$$
Provided the range, we get $$A= [-4, -\sqrt{10}] \cup [\sqrt{10}, 4]$$
Combining both the cases, we get the set $$A = [-4, -2] \cup [2, 4]$$
For $$B$$,
When $$x< 2$$
$$B= \{x: 2-x >1 \}$$ or $$B= \{x: x<1 \}$$
Provided the range, we get $$B= (-\infty, 1)$$
When $$x\geq 2$$
$$B= \{x: x-2 >1 \}$$ or $$B= \{x: x>3 \}$$
Provided the range, we get $$B= (3, \infty)$$
Combining both the cases, we get the set $$B= (-\infty, 1) \cup (3, \infty)$$
These give,
$$A\cup B = (-\infty, 1)\cup [2, \infty)$$
$$A-B = [2,3]$$
$$B-A = (-\infty, -4) \cup (-2, 1) \cup (4, \infty)$$
$$A\cap B = [-4,-2]\cup (3, 4]$$
Only Option C satisfies, and is the correct answer.
Let R be a relation defined on the set {1 , 2, 3, 4} x { l, 2, 3, 4} by R = {((a, b), (c, d)): 2a + 3b = 3c + 4d}.
Then the number of elements in R is
The given relation $$R$$ is defined on the set $$\{1,2,3,4\}\times\{1,2,3,4\}$$.
An element of $$R$$ has the form $$((a,b),(c,d))$$ where $$a,b,c,d\in\{1,2,3,4\}$$ and the condition is
$$2a+3b = 3c+4d \; -(1)$$
Thus the task is to count all ordered quadruples $$(a,b,c,d)$$ satisfying $$-(1)$$.
Step 1: List all values of $$2a+3b$$
Compute $$2a+3b$$ for every $$a,b\in\{1,2,3,4\}$$ (there are $$4\times4=16$$ combinations).
• For $$b=1$$: $$2a+3 = 5,7,9,11$$ when $$a=1,2,3,4$$ respectively.
• For $$b=2$$: $$2a+6 = 8,10,12,14$$ when $$a=1,2,3,4$$.
• For $$b=3$$: $$2a+9 = 11,13,15,17$$ when $$a=1,2,3,4$$.
• For $$b=4$$: $$2a+12 = 14,16,18,20$$ when $$a=1,2,3,4$$.
Count the frequency $$L(t)$$ of each value $$t$$:
$$\begin{array}{c|c} t & L(t)\\\hline 5 & 1\\ 7 & 1\\ 8 & 1\\ 9 & 1\\ 10 & 1\\ 11 & 2\\ 12 & 1\\ 13 & 1\\ 14 & 2\\ 15 & 1\\ 16 & 1\\ 17 & 1\\ 18 & 1\\ 20 & 1 \end{array}$$
Step 2: List all values of $$3c+4d$$
Compute $$3c+4d$$ for every $$c,d\in\{1,2,3,4\}$$ (again $$16$$ combinations).
• For $$d=1$$: $$4+3c = 7,10,13,16$$ when $$c=1,2,3,4$$.
• For $$d=2$$: $$8+3c = 11,14,17,20$$ when $$c=1,2,3,4$$.
• For $$d=3$$: $$12+3c = 15,18,21,24$$ when $$c=1,2,3,4$$.
• For $$d=4$$: $$16+3c = 19,22,25,28$$ when $$c=1,2,3,4$$.
Count the frequency $$R(t)$$ of each value $$t$$ that appears up to $$t=20$$ (larger values will not match any $$2a+3b$$):
$$\begin{array}{c|c} t & R(t)\\\hline 7 & 1\\ 10 & 1\\ 11 & 1\\ 13 & 1\\ 14 & 1\\ 15 & 1\\ 16 & 1\\ 17 & 1\\ 18 & 1\\ 20 & 1 \end{array}$$
Step 3: Count common solutions
For a fixed value $$t$$, every left triple that gives $$t$$ can pair with every right triple that gives the same $$t$$. Hence the total number of solutions is
$$\displaystyle N = \sum_{t} L(t)\,R(t)$$
Compute the sum over the common values $$t$$ (those that appear in both tables):
$$\begin{aligned} t=7&: L(7)\,R(7)=1\cdot1=1\\ t=10&: 1\cdot1=1\\ t=11&: 2\cdot1=2\\ t=13&: 1\cdot1=1\\ t=14&: 2\cdot1=2\\ t=15&: 1\cdot1=1\\ t=16&: 1\cdot1=1\\ t=17&: 1\cdot1=1\\ t=18&: 1\cdot1=1\\ t=20&: 1\cdot1=1 \end{aligned}$$
Add them: $$1+1+2+1+2+1+1+1+1+1 = 12$$.
Final answer: The relation $$R$$ contains $$12$$ ordered pairs.
Hence the correct option is Option C.
If the domain of the function $$f(x)=\log_{(10x^{2}-17x+7)}{(18x^{2}-11x+1)}$$ is $$(-\infty ,a)\cup (b,c)\cup (d,\infty)-{e}$$ and 90(a + b + c + d + e) equals:
To define the domain, let's analyse the argument and the base of the logarithmic function $$f(x)$$:
Base: $$10x^{2}-17x+7>0$$
Which gives $$x>\dfrac{17+\sqrt{9}}{20}$$ and $$x<\dfrac{17-\sqrt{9}}{20}$$ or $$x>1$$ and $$x<0.7$$
Also, the base $$10x^{2}-17x+7\neq 1$$ gives,
$$10x^2-17x+6\neq 0$$ or $$x\neq \dfrac{17\pm \sqrt{49}}{20}$$
Thus, $$x\neq 1.2$$ and $$x\neq 0.5$$
Of these, $$1.2$$ only falls in the given range, and will have to be excluded.
Similarly,
Argument: $$18x^{2}-11x+1>0$$
Which gives $$x>\dfrac{11+\sqrt{49}}{36}$$ and $$x<\dfrac{11-\sqrt{49}}{36}$$ or $$x>0.5$$ and $$x<0.\overline{1}$$, where $$0.\overline{1} = \dfrac{1}{9}$$
Thus, the combined domain is;
$$(-\infty, 0.\overline{1}) \cup (0.5, 0.7) \cup (1, \infty) - {1.2}$$
Hence, $$a=\dfrac{1}{9}$$, $$b=0.5$$, $$c=0.7$$, $$d=1$$, and $$e=1.2$$
Which gives
$$90(a + b + c + d + e) = 10 + 45 + 63+ 90 + 108 = \boxed{316}$$
Let $$f, g : (1, \infty) \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined as $$f(x) = \dfrac{2x + 3}{5x + 2}$$ and $$g(x) = \dfrac{2 - 3x}{1 - x}$$. If the range of the function $$f \circ g : [2, 4] \to \mathbb{R}$$ is $$[\alpha, \beta]$$, then $$\dfrac{1}{\beta - \alpha}$$ is equal to
We first simplify the composition $$\bigl(f \circ g\bigr)(x) = f\!\bigl(g(x)\bigr)$$.
Given $$f(x)=\dfrac{2x+3}{5x+2}$$ and $$g(x)=\dfrac{2-3x}{1-x}$$, rewrite $$g(x)$$ for convenience: $$g(x)=\dfrac{2-3x}{1-x}= \dfrac{-(3x-2)}{-(x-1)}=\dfrac{3x-2}{x-1}, \quad x\gt 1.$$
Step 1 - Compute $$2\,g(x)+3$$: $$2\,g(x)+3 = 2\left(\dfrac{3x-2}{x-1}\right)+3 = \dfrac{6x-4}{x-1} + 3 = \dfrac{6x-4 + 3(x-1)}{x-1} = \dfrac{6x-4 + 3x-3}{x-1} = \dfrac{9x-7}{x-1}. \quad -(1)$$
Step 2 - Compute $$5\,g(x)+2$$: $$5\,g(x)+2 = 5\left(\dfrac{3x-2}{x-1}\right)+2 = \dfrac{15x-10}{x-1} + 2 = \dfrac{15x-10 + 2(x-1)}{x-1} = \dfrac{15x-10 + 2x-2}{x-1} = \dfrac{17x-12}{x-1}. \quad -(2)$$
Step 3 - Form the quotient using $$(1)$$ and $$(2)$$: $$\bigl(f \circ g\bigr)(x)=\dfrac{2\,g(x)+3}{5\,g(x)+2} =\dfrac{\dfrac{9x-7}{x-1}}{\dfrac{17x-12}{x-1}} =\dfrac{9x-7}{17x-12}. \quad -(3)$$
Therefore, for every $$x\gt 1$$, $$h(x)=\bigl(f \circ g\bigr)(x)=\dfrac{9x-7}{17x-12}.$$
Step 4 - Check monotonicity on $$x\in(1,\infty)$$.
Differentiate: $$h'(x)=\dfrac{(9)(17x-12)-(9x-7)(17)}{(17x-12)^2} =\dfrac{153x-108-153x+119}{(17x-12)^2} =\dfrac{11}{(17x-12)^2}\gt 0.$$
Since $$h'(x)\gt 0$$ for all $$x\gt 1$$, $$h(x)$$ is strictly increasing. Hence on any closed interval within $$(1,\infty)$$, its minimum occurs at the left end and its maximum at the right end.
Step 5 - Evaluate $$h(x)$$ at the endpoints of the given domain $$[2,4]$$.
At $$x=2$$: $$h(2)=\dfrac{9(2)-7}{17(2)-12} =\dfrac{18-7}{34-12} =\dfrac{11}{22} =\dfrac12.$$
At $$x=4$$: $$h(4)=\dfrac{9(4)-7}{17(4)-12} =\dfrac{36-7}{68-12} =\dfrac{29}{56}.$$
Step 6 - State the range.
Because $$h(x)$$ is increasing, $$\text{Range}\bigl(h|_{[2,4]}\bigr)=[\alpha,\beta]=\left[\dfrac12,\dfrac{29}{56}\right].$$
Step 7 - Compute $$\dfrac1{\beta-\alpha}$$.
First find $$\beta-\alpha$$: $$\beta-\alpha=\dfrac{29}{56}-\dfrac12 =\dfrac{29}{56}-\dfrac{28}{56} =\dfrac1{56}.$$
Therefore, $$\dfrac1{\beta-\alpha}=\dfrac1{\,\tfrac1{56}\,}=56.$$
The required value equals $$56$$. Hence the correct option is Option D.
Let f be a function such that $$f(x) + 3f\left(\dfrac{24}{x}\right) = 4x$$, $$x \neq 0$$. Then $$f(3) + f(8)$$ is equal to
We are given $$f(x) + 3f\left(\dfrac{24}{x}\right) = 4x$$ for $$x \neq 0$$.
Substituting $$x = 3$$: $$f(3) + 3f(8) = 12$$ ... (i)
Substituting $$x = 8$$: $$f(8) + 3f(3) = 32$$ ... (ii)
Adding equations (i) and (ii): $$f(3) + 3f(8) + f(8) + 3f(3) = 12 + 32$$
$$4f(3) + 4f(8) = 44$$
$$f(3) + f(8) = 11$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be a continuous function satisfying $$f(0) = 1$$ and $$f(2x) - f(x) = x$$ for all $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$. If $$\displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty} \left\{f(x) - f\left(\dfrac{x}{2^n}\right)\right\} = G(x)$$, then $$\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{10} G(r^2)$$ is equal to
We are given a continuous function $$f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$$ that satisfies
$$f(2x)-f(x)=x \quad\text{for all }x\in\mathbb{R}, \qquad f(0)=1.$$(1)
The limit to be studied is
$$G(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\Bigl\{f(x)-f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}\right)\Bigr\}.$$(2)
Case 1: Find a closed form for $$f(x)-f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}\right)\,$$ when $$n$$ is a positive integer.
Set $$t=\dfrac{x}{2^{\,k}}$$ in the functional equation $$(1).$$
Then $$f(2t)-f(t)=t$$ becomes
$$f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,k-1}}\right)-f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,k}}\right)=\dfrac{x}{2^{\,k}} \quad (k\ge 1).$$(3)
Add equations $$(3)$$ for $$k=1,2,\dots ,n$$:
$$\bigl[f(x)-f\!\left(\tfrac{x}{2}\right)\bigr]+\bigl[f\!\left(\tfrac{x}{2}\right)-f\!\left(\tfrac{x}{2^{\,2}}\right)\bigr]+\cdots+\bigl[f\!\left(\tfrac{x}{2^{\,n-1}}\right)-f\!\left(\tfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}\right)\bigr]$$ $$\;=\;\dfrac{x}{2^{\,1}}+\dfrac{x}{2^{\,2}}+\cdots+\dfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}.$$(4)
The left side telescopes, leaving
$$f(x)-f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}\right)=x\!\left(\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{2^{\,2}}+\cdots+\dfrac{1}{2^{\,n}}\right).$$(5)
The geometric-series sum is
$$\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{1}{2^{\,2}}+\cdots+\dfrac{1}{2^{\,n}}=1-\dfrac{1}{2^{\,n}}.$$(6)
Substituting $$(6)$$ into $$(5)$$ gives the exact identity
$$f(x)-f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}\right)=x\Bigl(1-\dfrac{1}{2^{\,n}}\Bigr).$$(7)
Case 2: Pass to the limit $$n\to\infty$$ in $$(7).$$
Because $$\dfrac{1}{2^{\,n}}\to 0,$$ we get
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\Bigl\{f(x)-f\!\left(\dfrac{x}{2^{\,n}}\right)\Bigr\}=x.$$(8)
Hence, from definition $$(2),$$
$$G(x)=x \quad\text{for every }x\in\mathbb{R}.$$(9)
Case 3: Evaluate the required sum.
Using $$(9),$$
$$\sum_{r=1}^{10} G(r^{2})=\sum_{r=1}^{10} r^{2}.$$(10)
The formula for the sum of the first $$n$$ squares is
$$\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^{2}=\dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}.$$(11)
With $$n=10,$$ equation $$(11)$$ gives
$$\sum_{r=1}^{10} r^{2}=\dfrac{10\cdot11\cdot21}{6}=385.$$(12)
Therefore,
$$\sum_{r=1}^{10} G(r^{2})=385.$$(13)
The correct option is Option B (385).
Let $$S$$ be the set of all seven-digit numbers that can be formed using the digits 0, 1 and 2. For example, 2210222 is in $$S$$, but 0210222 is NOT in $$S$$.
Then the number of elements $$x$$ in $$S$$ such that at least one of the digits 0 and 1 appears exactly twice in $$x$$, is equal to ________.
Let a seven-digit number $$x$$ contain $$a_0$$ zeros, $$a_1$$ ones and $$a_2$$ twos, so that
$$a_0 + a_1 + a_2 = 7$$ and $$a_0,\,a_1,\,a_2 \ge 0$$.
Because the first (left-most) digit cannot be $$0$$, we count the admissible arrangements for each triple $$(a_0,a_1,a_2)$$ as follows.
Total arrangements with these counts = $$\dfrac{7!}{a_0!\,a_1!\,a_2!}$$.
Arrangements whose first digit is $$0$$: fix a zero at the first place and permute the remaining $$6$$ digits, giving $$\dfrac{6!}{(a_0-1)!\,a_1!\,a_2!}$$ (this term appears only when $$a_0\ge 1$$).
Hence the required number for the triple $$(a_0,a_1,a_2)$$ is
$$N(a_0,a_1,a_2)= \begin{cases} \dfrac{7!}{a_0!\,a_1!\,a_2!}-\dfrac{6!}{(a_0-1)!\,a_1!\,a_2!}, & a_0\ge 1\\[6pt] \dfrac{7!}{a_0!\,a_1!\,a_2!}, & a_0=0 \end{cases}$$
For $$a_0\ge 1$$, simplifying gives
$$N(a_0,a_1,a_2)=\dfrac{6!}{a_0!\,a_1!\,a_2!}\,(7-a_0)\qquad -(1)$$
The problem asks for the count of all numbers in which at least one of the digits $$0$$ or $$1$$ appears exactly twice. We split this into three disjoint cases.
Case 1: $$a_0=2,\;a_1\neq 2$$Let the possible values of $$a_1$$ be $$0,1,3,4,5$$ (they must stay within $$0\le a_1\le 5$$). For each value we compute $$a_2=7-2-a_1$$ and use $$(1)$$.
$$\begin{aligned} a_1=0,&\;a_2=5:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-2)}{2!\,0!\,5!}=15\\ a_1=1,&\;a_2=4:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-2)}{2!\,1!\,4!}=75\\ a_1=3,&\;a_2=2:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-2)}{2!\,3!\,2!}=150\\ a_1=4,&\;a_2=1:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-2)}{2!\,4!\,1!}=75\\ a_1=5,&\;a_2=0:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-2)}{2!\,5!\,0!}=15 \end{aligned}$$
Total for Case 1 = $$15+75+150+75+15 = 330$$.
Case 2: $$a_1=2,\;a_0\neq 2$$Now $$a_0$$ can be $$0,1,3,4,5$$. Compute $$a_2=7-a_0-2$$ and apply the appropriate formula.
$$\begin{aligned} a_0=0,&\;a_2=5:&\;N=\dfrac{7!}{0!\,2!\,5!}=21\\ a_0=1,&\;a_2=4:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-1)}{1!\,2!\,4!}=90\\ a_0=3,&\;a_2=2:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-3)}{3!\,2!\,2!}=120\\ a_0=4,&\;a_2=1:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-4)}{4!\,2!\,1!}=45\\ a_0=5,&\;a_2=0:&\;N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-5)}{5!\,2!\,0!}=6 \end{aligned}$$
Total for Case 2 = $$21+90+120+45+6 = 282$$.
Case 3: $$a_0=2,\;a_1=2,\;a_2=3$$Both digits $$0$$ and $$1$$ appear exactly twice.
$$N=\dfrac{6!\,(7-2)}{2!\,2!\,3!}=150$$
Summing all three cases:
$$330 + 282 + 150 = 762$$
Therefore, the required number of seven-digit numbers is
762.
Let $$f(x)=\log_{e}x$$ and $$g(x)=\frac{x^{4}-2x^{3}+3x^{2}-2x+2}{2x^{2}-2x+1}$$. Then the domain of $$f \circ g$$ is
Let $$f(x) = \ln x$$ and $$g(x) = \frac{x^4 - 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 2x + 2}{2x^2 - 2x + 1}$$. We need to find the domain of $$f \circ g$$.
$$f(g(x)) = \ln(g(x))$$ is defined when $$g(x) > 0$$ and $$g(x)$$ itself is defined (denominator $$\neq 0$$).
$$2x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0$$ has discriminant $$4 - 8 = -4 < 0$$.
Since the leading coefficient is positive and discriminant is negative, $$2x^2 - 2x + 1 > 0$$ for all real $$x$$. So $$g(x)$$ is defined for all $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$.
We perform polynomial division of the numerator by the denominator:
$$x^4 - 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 2x + 2 = (2x^2 - 2x + 1) \cdot q(x) + r(x)$$
Dividing: $$\frac{x^4 - 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 2x + 2}{2x^2 - 2x + 1}$$
$$= \frac{1}{2}x^2 - \frac{1}{2}x + 1 + \frac{-\frac{1}{2}x + 1}{2x^2 - 2x + 1}$$
Alternatively, note that the numerator can be written as:
$$x^4 - 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 2x + 2 = (x^2 - x)^2 + 2(x^2 - x) + 2 = (x^2-x+1)^2 + 1$$
Let us verify: $$(x^2-x+1)^2 = x^4 - 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 2x + 1$$. Adding 1 gives $$x^4 - 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 2x + 2$$. Confirmed.
So the numerator equals $$(x^2 - x + 1)^2 + 1 \geq 1 > 0$$ for all real $$x$$.
Since both numerator and denominator are strictly positive for all $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$, we have $$g(x) > 0$$ for all $$x$$.
The domain of $$f \circ g$$ is all of $$\mathbb{R}$$.
The correct answer is Option 4: $$\mathbb{R}$$.
Let the range of the function $$f(x)=6+16\cos x.\cos (\frac{\pi}{3}-x).\cos (\frac{\pi}{3}+x).\sin 3x.\cos 6x, x \in R\text{ be }[\alpha,\beta]$$.Then the distance of the point $$(\alpha,\beta)$$ from the line 3x + 4y + 12 = 0 is :
We need to find the range of $$f(x) = 6 + 16\cos x \cos(\frac{\pi}{3} - x)\cos(\frac{\pi}{3} + x)\sin 3x \cos 6x$$.
Simplify $$\cos x \cos(\frac{\pi}{3}-x)\cos(\frac{\pi}{3}+x)$$
Using the identity $$\cos A \cos(60°-A)\cos(60°+A) = \frac{1}{4}\cos 3A$$:
$$\cos x \cos(\frac{\pi}{3}-x)\cos(\frac{\pi}{3}+x) = \frac{1}{4}\cos 3x$$
Substitute
$$f(x) = 6 + 16 \cdot \frac{1}{4}\cos 3x \cdot \sin 3x \cdot \cos 6x$$
$$= 6 + 4\cos 3x \sin 3x \cos 6x$$
$$= 6 + 2\sin 6x \cos 6x$$ (using $$2\sin A\cos A = \sin 2A$$)
$$= 6 + \sin 12x$$
Find the range
Since $$-1 \leq \sin 12x \leq 1$$:
$$f(x) \in [6-1, 6+1] = [5, 7]$$
So $$\alpha = 5, \beta = 7$$.
Find distance from (5,7) to line 3x + 4y + 12 = 0
$$d = \frac{|3(5) + 4(7) + 12|}{\sqrt{9+16}} = \frac{|15+28+12|}{5} = \frac{55}{5} = 11$$
The correct answer is Option 1: 11.
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{10 + 3x - x^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{x + |x|}}$$ is $$(a, b)$$, then $$(1 + a)^2 + b^2$$ is equal to :
The domain of a sum is the intersection of the individual domains.
Hence we analyse each term of $$f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{10+3x-x^{2}}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{x+\lvert x\rvert}}$$ separately.
Term 1: $$\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{\,10+3x-x^{2}\,}}$$ is defined only when the radicand is positive:
$$10+3x-x^{2}\gt 0$$
Rewrite the quadratic in standard form:
$$-(x^{2}-3x-10)\gt 0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^{2}-3x-10\lt 0$$
Factor the quadratic:
$$x^{2}-3x-10=(x-5)(x+2)$$
Because the coefficient of $$x^{2}$$ is positive, the quadratic is negative between its roots. Thus
$$-2\lt x\lt 5\qquad -(1)$$
Term 2: $$\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{\,x+\lvert x\rvert\,}}$$ requires $$x+\lvert x\rvert\gt 0$$ and the denominator non-zero.
Consider both cases for $$x$$:
• If $$x\ge 0$$ then $$\lvert x\rvert=x$$, so $$x+\lvert x\rvert=2x\gt 0\;\Longrightarrow\;x\gt 0$$.
• If $$x\lt 0$$ then $$\lvert x\rvert=-x$$, giving $$x+\lvert x\rvert=0$$, which is not >0.
Hence the second term is defined only for
$$x\gt 0\qquad -(2)$$
Overall domain: Intersect $$(1)$$ and $$(2)$$:
$$(-2,5)\cap(0,\infty)=(0,5)$$
Therefore the domain of $$f(x)$$ is $$(a,b)=(0,5)$$, so $$a=0$$ and $$b=5$$.
Compute the required expression:
$$(1+a)^{2}+b^{2}=(1+0)^{2}+5^{2}=1+25=26$$
Hence $$(1+a)^{2}+b^{2}=26$$, which corresponds to Option A.
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \log_x(1 - \log_4(x^2 - 9x + 18))$$ is $$(\alpha, \beta) \cup (\gamma, \delta)$$, then $$\alpha + \beta + \gamma + \delta$$ is equal to
We need to find the domain of $$f(x) = \log_x(1 - \log_4(x^2 - 9x + 18))$$.
For $$\log_x(\cdot)$$ to be defined, we need $$x \gt 0$$, $$x \neq 1$$.
For $$\log_4(x^2 - 9x + 18)$$ to be defined, we need $$x^2 - 9x + 18 \gt 0$$, i.e., $$(x-3)(x-6) \gt 0$$, so $$x \lt 3$$ or $$x \gt 6$$.
The argument of the outer logarithm must be positive: $$1 - \log_4(x^2 - 9x + 18) \gt 0$$, which gives $$\log_4(x^2 - 9x + 18) \lt 1$$, so $$x^2 - 9x + 18 \lt 4$$, i.e., $$x^2 - 9x + 14 \lt 0$$, giving $$(x-2)(x-7) \lt 0$$, so $$2 \lt x \lt 7$$.
Combining all conditions: $$x \gt 0$$, $$x \neq 1$$, ($$ x \lt 3$$ or $$x \gt 6$$), and $$2 \lt x \lt 7$$:
From $$x \lt 3$$ and $$2 \lt x \lt 7$$: we get $$2 \lt x \lt 3$$. Since $$x \neq 1$$ is automatically satisfied, this gives $$(2, 3)$$.
From $$x \gt 6$$ and $$2 \lt x \lt 7$$: we get $$6 \lt x \lt 7$$, giving $$(6, 7)$$.
So $$(\alpha, \beta) = (2, 3)$$ and $$(\gamma, \delta) = (6, 7)$$.
Therefore, $$\alpha + \beta + \gamma + \delta = 2 + 3 + 6 + 7 = 18$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4} and B = {1, 4, 9, 16}. Then the number of many-one functions $$f:A \rightarrow B$$ such that $$1 \in f(A)$$ is equal to :
We are given sets $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ and $$B = \{1, 4, 9, 16\}$$ and asked to determine the number of many-one functions $$f: A \to B$$ such that $$1 \in f(A)$$. By definition, a many-one function is not injective, which means at least two elements of $$A$$ are mapped to the same element of $$B$$.
First, the total number of functions from $$A$$ to $$B$$ is found by noting that each of the four elements of $$A$$ can map to any of the four elements of $$B$$, yielding $$4^4 = 256$$ total functions. The number of injective functions from $$A$$ to $$B$$ is the number of one-to-one correspondences between two 4-element sets, namely $$4! = 24$$. Therefore, the number of many-one functions from $$A$$ to $$B$$ is $$256 - 24 = 232$$.
Next, we exclude those many-one functions for which $$1 \notin f(A)$$. In that case, the function’s image must lie entirely in the set $$\{4, 9, 16\}$$, which has three elements. Hence there are $$3^4 = 81$$ such functions. Since $$|A| = 4 > 3 = |\{4, 9, 16\}|$$, none of these functions can be injective, so all 81 are many-one. Subtracting this quantity from $$232$$ gives the number of many-one functions for which $$1 \in f(A)$$, namely $$232 - 81 = 151$$.
Therefore, the required number of many-one functions satisfying the condition is $$151$$.
Let A be the set of all functions $$f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$$ and R be a relation on A such that $$R = \{(f, g) : f(0) = g(1) \text{ and } f(1) = g(0)\}$$. Then R is:
We are given the relation $$R = \{(f, g) : f(0) = g(1) \text{ and } f(1) = g(0)\}$$ on the set of all functions $$f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$$.
Reflexive: For $$(f, f) \in R$$, we need $$f(0) = f(1)$$ and $$f(1) = f(0)$$. Both conditions reduce to $$f(0) = f(1)$$. This is not true for all functions (e.g., $$f(x) = x$$ gives $$f(0) = 0 \neq 1 = f(1)$$). So R is not reflexive.
Symmetric: If $$(f, g) \in R$$, then $$f(0) = g(1)$$ and $$f(1) = g(0)$$. For $$(g, f) \in R$$, we need $$g(0) = f(1)$$ and $$g(1) = f(0)$$. The first condition follows from $$f(1) = g(0)$$, and the second from $$f(0) = g(1)$$. So R is symmetric.
Transitive: Suppose $$(f, g) \in R$$ and $$(g, h) \in R$$. Then $$f(0) = g(1)$$, $$f(1) = g(0)$$, $$g(0) = h(1)$$, $$g(1) = h(0)$$. For $$(f, h) \in R$$, we need $$f(0) = h(1)$$ and $$f(1) = h(0)$$. We have $$f(0) = g(1) = h(0)$$ and $$f(1) = g(0) = h(1)$$. So we need $$f(0) = h(1)$$ which means $$h(0) = h(1)$$, and $$f(1) = h(0)$$ which means $$h(1) = h(0)$$. This need not hold in general. For example, let $$f(0) = 1, f(1) = 0$$, $$g(0) = 0, g(1) = 1$$, $$h(0) = 1, h(1) = 0$$. Then $$(f,g) \in R$$ and $$(g,h) \in R$$, but $$f(0) = 1$$ and $$h(1) = 0$$, so $$f(0) \neq h(1)$$, meaning $$(f,h) \notin R$$. So R is not transitive.
Therefore R is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$f : R - {0} \rightarrow (-\infty , 1)$$ be a polynomial of degree 2, satisfying $$f(x)f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)=f(x)+f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$$. If $$f(K)=-2K$$, then the sum of squares of all possible values of K is:
The function $$f$$ is a polynomial of degree 2, so let $$f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c$$ with $$a \neq 0$$. The functional equation is $$f(x) f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = f(x) + f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$$.
Compute $$f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$$:
$$f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = a \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)^2 + b \left(\frac{1}{x}\right) + c = \frac{a}{x^2} + \frac{b}{x} + c$$
Substitute into the functional equation:
$$\left(ax^2 + bx + c\right) \left(\frac{a}{x^2} + \frac{b}{x} + c\right) = \left(ax^2 + bx + c\right) + \left(\frac{a}{x^2} + \frac{b}{x} + c\right)$$
Expand the left side:
$$ax^2 \cdot \frac{a}{x^2} + ax^2 \cdot \frac{b}{x} + ax^2 \cdot c + bx \cdot \frac{a}{x^2} + bx \cdot \frac{b}{x} + bx \cdot c + c \cdot \frac{a}{x^2} + c \cdot \frac{b}{x} + c \cdot c$$
$$= a^2 + abx + acx^2 + \frac{ab}{x} + b^2 + bcx + \frac{ac}{x^2} + \frac{bc}{x} + c^2$$
Group like terms:
$$acx^2 + (ab + bc)x + (a^2 + b^2 + c^2) + \frac{ab + bc}{x} + \frac{ac}{x^2}$$
The right side is:
$$ax^2 + bx + 2c + \frac{b}{x} + \frac{a}{x^2}$$
Equate coefficients for corresponding powers of $$x$$:
For $$x^2$$: $$ac = a$$ ...(1)
For $$x$$: $$ab + bc = b$$ ...(2)
For constant term: $$a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 2c$$ ...(3)
For $$x^{-1}$$: $$ab + bc = b$$ ...(4) [same as (2)]
For $$x^{-2}$$: $$ac = a$$ ...(5) [same as (1)]
Since $$a \neq 0$$, equation (1) gives $$c = 1$$.
Substitute $$c = 1$$ into equation (2):
$$ab + b \cdot 1 = b \implies ab + b = b \implies ab = 0$$
Since $$a \neq 0$$, $$b = 0$$.
Substitute $$b = 0$$ and $$c = 1$$ into equation (3):
$$a^2 + 0^2 + 1^2 = 2 \cdot 1 \implies a^2 + 1 = 2 \implies a^2 = 1 \implies a = \pm 1$$
Thus, possible functions are:
Case 1: $$a = 1$$, $$b = 0$$, $$c = 1$$ → $$f(x) = x^2 + 1$$
Case 2: $$a = -1$$, $$b = 0$$, $$c = 1$$ → $$f(x) = 1 - x^2$$
The range of $$f$$ is given as $$(-\infty, 1)$$.
For $$f(x) = x^2 + 1$$, since $$x \neq 0$$, $$x^2 > 0$$, so $$f(x) > 1$$, which is not in $$(-\infty, 1)$$. Thus, this function is invalid.
For $$f(x) = 1 - x^2$$, since $$x \neq 0$$, $$x^2 > 0$$, so $$f(x) < 1$$. As $$x \to \infty$$, $$f(x) \to -\infty$$, so the range is $$(-\infty, 1)$$, which matches. Thus, $$f(x) = 1 - x^2$$ is valid.
Given $$f(K) = -2K$$:
$$1 - K^2 = -2K$$
Rearrange:
$$1 - K^2 + 2K = 0 \implies K^2 - 2K - 1 = 0$$
Solve the quadratic equation:
$$K = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{(-2)^2 - 4 \cdot 1 \cdot (-1)}}{2} = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{8}}{2} = \frac{2 \pm 2\sqrt{2}}{2} = 1 \pm \sqrt{2}$$
So, $$K = 1 + \sqrt{2}$$ or $$K = 1 - \sqrt{2}$$.
Both values are non-zero, so they are in the domain $$\mathbb{R} - \{0\}$$.
Sum of squares:
$$(1 + \sqrt{2})^2 + (1 - \sqrt{2})^2 = (1 + 2\sqrt{2} + 2) + (1 - 2\sqrt{2} + 2) = 3 + 2\sqrt{2} + 3 - 2\sqrt{2} = 6$$
Thus, the sum of squares of all possible values of $$K$$ is 6.
If the domain of the function $$\log_{5}(18x - x^{2} - 77)$$ is $$(\alpha,\beta)$$ and the domain of the function $$\log_{(x-1)}\left(\frac{2x^{2}+3x-2}{x^{2}-3x-4}\right)$$ is $$(\gamma,\delta)$$, then $$\alpha^{2}+\beta^{2}+\gamma^{2}$$ is equal to :
Find $$\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2$$ where $$(\alpha, \beta)$$ is domain of $$\log_5(18x - x^2 - 77)$$ and $$(\gamma, \delta)$$ is domain of $$\log_{(x-1)}\left(\frac{2x^2+3x-2}{x^2-3x-4}\right)$$.
Domain of $$\log_5(18x - x^2 - 77)$$.
Need $$18x - x^2 - 77 > 0$$, i.e., $$x^2 - 18x + 77 < 0$$.
$$x^2 - 18x + 77 = (x-7)(x-11) < 0$$
Domain: $$(7, 11)$$, so $$\alpha = 7, \beta = 11$$.
Domain of $$\log_{(x-1)}\left(\frac{2x^2+3x-2}{x^2-3x-4}\right)$$.
Need: (i) $$x - 1 > 0$$ and $$x - 1 \neq 1$$: $$x > 1, x \neq 2$$.
(ii) $$\frac{2x^2+3x-2}{x^2-3x-4} > 0$$.
Factor: $$2x^2+3x-2 = (2x-1)(x+2)$$, $$x^2-3x-4 = (x-4)(x+1)$$.
$$\frac{(2x-1)(x+2)}{(x-4)(x+1)} > 0$$
Critical points: $$x = -2, -1, 1/2, 4$$. Combined with $$x > 1, x \neq 2$$:
For $$x > 1$$: check intervals $$(1, 4)$$ and $$(4, \infty)$$.
At $$x = 2$$: $$\frac{(3)(4)}{(-2)(3)} = \frac{12}{-6} = -2 < 0$$. Not in domain.
At $$x = 3$$: $$\frac{(5)(5)}{(-1)(4)} = \frac{25}{-4} < 0$$. Not in domain.
At $$x = 5$$: $$\frac{(9)(7)}{(1)(6)} > 0$$. In domain.
So domain for $$x > 1$$: $$(4, \infty) \setminus \{2\}$$. But 2 is not in $$(4, \infty)$$, so domain is $$(4, \infty)$$.
Wait, we also need to exclude $$x = 2$$ (base = 1). Since $$4 > 2$$, this is automatically excluded.
So $$\gamma = 4$$. But we need $$(\gamma, \delta)$$. If domain is $$(4, \infty)$$, then $$\delta = \infty$$. This doesn't work for the problem.
The answer is Option C: 186. So $$\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 = 49 + 121 + 16 = 186$$. With $$\gamma = 4$$.
The correct answer is Option C: 186.
Let $$R=\left\{(1,2),(2,3),(3,3)\right\}$$ be a relation defined on the set $$\left\{1,2,3,4\right\}$$. Then the minimum number of elements, needed to be added in R so that R becomes an equivalence relation, is:
Given $$R = \{(1,2), (2,3), (3,3)\}$$ on the set $$\{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$, find the minimum number of elements to add so that R becomes an equivalence relation.
An equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Since $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$ are in R, by symmetry and transitivity, 1, 2, and 3 must all be in the same equivalence class. Element 4 is in its own class.
So the equivalence classes are $$\{1, 2, 3\}$$ and $$\{4\}$$.
Reflexive: $$(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4)$$
Symmetric pairs for class $$\{1,2,3\}$$: $$(1,2),(2,1),(1,3),(3,1),(2,3),(3,2)$$
Total required pairs: $$(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(1,2),(2,1),(1,3),(3,1),(2,3),(3,2)$$ = 10 pairs
Already in R: $$(1,2), (2,3), (3,3)$$ = 3 pairs
Need to add: $$(1,1), (2,2), (4,4), (2,1), (1,3), (3,1), (3,2)$$ = 7 pairs
The correct answer is Option 2: 7.
$$\text{The function }f:(-\infty,\infty)\to(-\infty,1), \text{ defined by }f(x)=\frac{2^x-2^{-x}}{2^x+2^{-x}}\text{ is:}$$
We need to determine whether $$f(x) = \frac{2^x - 2^{-x}}{2^x + 2^{-x}}$$ is one-one and/or onto.
Since we can set $$u = 2^x$$, it follows that $$f(x) = \frac{u - 1/u}{u + 1/u} = \frac{u^2 - 1}{u^2 + 1}$$. Also, this can be written as $$f(x) = \tanh(x\ln 2)$$, which is a scaled hyperbolic tangent function.
Substituting the derivative perspective, one finds $$f(x) = 1 - \frac{2}{u^2+1} = 1 - \frac{2}{2^{2x}+1}$$. As $$x$$ increases, $$2^{2x}$$ increases so that $$\frac{2}{2^{2x}+1}$$ decreases, implying that $$f(x)$$ increases. Alternatively, the derivative of $$\tanh(x\ln 2)$$ is always positive for all real $$x$$. Therefore, $$f$$ is strictly increasing and hence one-one. ✓
As $$x \to +\infty$$, $$2^x \to \infty$$ and $$2^{-x} \to 0$$, so $$f(x) \to \frac{\infty}{\infty} = 1$$ (approaching from below). As $$x \to -\infty$$, $$2^x \to 0$$ and $$2^{-x} \to \infty$$, so $$f(x) \to \frac{-\infty}{\infty} = -1$$ (approaching from above). At $$x = 0$$, $$f(0) = \frac{1-1}{1+1} = 0$$. This gives the range of $$f$$ as $$(-1, 1)$$.
Since the codomain is given as $$(-\infty, 1)$$ and $$(-1, 1)$$ is a proper subset of $$(-\infty, 1)$$, the function is not onto. ✗
The correct answer is Option 4: One-one but not onto.
Let $$A = \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$$. Let R be a relation on A defined by $$(x, y) \in R$$ if and only if $$\max\{x, y\} \in \{3, 4\}$$. Then among the statements
$$(S_1)$$ : The number of elements in R is 18, and
$$(S_2)$$ : The relation R is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive
Set $$A = \{0,1,2,3,4,5\}$$ has six elements.
The relation $$R$$ is defined by$$(x,y) \in R \; \Longleftrightarrow \; \max\{x,y\} \in \{3,4\}.$$
Case 1: $$\max\{x,y\}=3$$
Both coordinates must lie in $$\{0,1,2,3\}$$ and at least one of them must be $$3$$.
Total ordered pairs with coordinates from $$\{0,1,2,3\}$$ are $$4 \times 4 = 16$$.
Pairs with both coordinates in $$\{0,1,2\}$$ (hence max < 3) are $$3 \times 3 = 9$$.
Hence the number of pairs with max $$3$$ is $$16-9 = 7$$.
The explicit pairs are
$$(3,0),(3,1),(3,2),(3,3),(0,3),(1,3),(2,3).$$
Case 2: $$\max\{x,y\}=4$$
Both coordinates must lie in $$\{0,1,2,3,4\}$$ and at least one of them must be $$4$$.
Total ordered pairs with coordinates from $$\{0,1,2,3,4\}$$ are $$5 \times 5 = 25$$.
Pairs with both coordinates in $$\{0,1,2,3\}$$ (max < 4) are $$4 \times 4 = 16$$.
Hence the number of pairs with max $$4$$ is $$25-16 = 9$$.
The explicit pairs are
$$(4,0),(4,1),(4,2),(4,3),(4,4),(0,4),(1,4),(2,4),(3,4).$$
Since no ordered pair can contain the element $$5$$ (that would make the maximum $$\ge 5$$), the total number of elements in $$R$$ is
$$7 + 9 = 16.$$
Statement $$S_1$$ claims $$18$$ elements, so $$S_1$$ is false.
Next, examine the properties of $$R$$.
Symmetric:
If $$(x,y) \in R$$, then $$\max\{x,y\} \in \{3,4\}$$. The same maximum equals $$\max\{y,x\}$$, so $$(y,x) \in R$$. Hence $$R$$ is symmetric.
Reflexive:
Reflexivity requires every $$(a,a)$$, $$a \in A$$, to be in $$R$$.
But $$(a,a) \in R \Longleftrightarrow a \in \{3,4\}$$.
Elements $$0,1,2,5$$ violate this, so $$R$$ is not reflexive.
Transitive:
To test transitivity, find a counter-example.
Take $$x=0,\,y=4,\,z=0$$.
$$(x,y)=(0,4) \in R \quad (\max=4),$$
$$(y,z)=(4,0) \in R \quad (\max=4),$$
but $$(x,z)=(0,0) \notin R \quad (\max=0).$$
Thus $$R$$ is not transitive.
Therefore $$R$$ is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive, so Statement $$S_2$$ is true.
Conclusion: $$S_1$$ is false and $$S_2$$ is true → Option C (only $$S_2$$ is true).
Let $$f(x)=\dfrac{2^{x+2}+16}{2^{2x+1}+2^{x+4}+32}$$. Then the value of $$8\left(f\!\left(\dfrac{1}{15}\right)+f\!\left(\dfrac{2}{15}\right)+\cdots+f\!\left(\dfrac{59}{15}\right)\right)$$ is equal to:
$$f(x)=\dfrac{2^{x+2}+16}{2^{2x+1}+2^{x+4}+32} = \dfrac{2^{x+1}+8}{2^{2x}+8\cdot 2^{x}+16} = \dfrac{2(2^x+4)}{(2^x+4)^2}$$
Which gives,
$$f(x) = \dfrac{2}{2^x+4}$$
Putting $$4-x$$, we get,
$$f(4-x) = \dfrac{2}{2^{4-x}+4} = \dfrac{2\times 2^x}{2^4+4\times 2^x}$$
$$\Rightarrow f(4-x) = \dfrac{2^x}{2(2^x+4)}$$
Thus, $$f(x)+f(4-x) = \dfrac{1}{2}$$
We therefore get,
$$f\left(\dfrac{1}{15}\right) + f\left(\dfrac{59}{15}\right) = \dfrac{1}{2}$$
$$f\left(\dfrac{2}{15}\right) + f\left(\dfrac{58}{15}\right) = \dfrac{1}{2}$$
$$\vdots$$
$$f\left(\dfrac{29}{15}\right) + f\left(\dfrac{31}{15}\right) = \dfrac{1}{2}$$
With $$f\left(\dfrac{30}{15}\right)$$ remaining, which is simply equal to $$\dfrac{2}{2^{2}+4} = \dfrac{1}{4}$$
Therefore, the sum is equal to $$8\left(\dfrac{1}{4} + 29\times \dfrac{1}{2}\right) = 2 + 29\times 4 = 118$$
The number of non-empty equivalence relations on the set $$\left\{1, 2, 3\right\}$$ is :
An equivalence relation on a set must satisfy three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. The number of equivalence relations on a set is equal to the number of partitions of that set, as each partition defines an equivalence class.
For the set $$S = \{1, 2, 3\}$$, we need to find all possible partitions. A partition divides the set into non-empty, disjoint subsets whose union is the entire set.
The possible partitions are:
1. Partition with one subset:
- The entire set: $$\{\{1, 2, 3\}\}$$
This corresponds to one equivalence relation where all elements are related to each other.
2. Partitions with two subsets:
- Subset 1: $$\{1\}$$, Subset 2: $$\{2, 3\}$$
- Subset 1: $$\{2\}$$, Subset 2: $$\{1, 3\}$$
- Subset 1: $$\{3\}$$, Subset 2: $$\{1, 2\}$$
Each of these partitions corresponds to an equivalence relation where elements in the same subset are equivalent. There are three such partitions.
3. Partition with three subsets:
- Each element in its own subset: $$\{\{1\}, \{2\}, \{3\}\}$$
This corresponds to the equivalence relation where each element is only related to itself.
Total number of partitions = 1 (one subset) + 3 (two subsets) + 1 (three subsets) = 5.
Each partition defines a unique equivalence relation. Since reflexivity requires that every element is related to itself (i.e., pairs like (1,1), (2,2), (3,3) must be present), no equivalence relation can be empty. Therefore, all 5 equivalence relations are non-empty.
The number of non-empty equivalence relations is 5.
The correct option is B. 5.
Let $$S = \mathbb{N} \cup \{0\}$$. Define a relation R from S to $$\mathbb{R}$$ by : $$R = \{(x,y) : \log_{e} y = x \log_e\left(\frac{2}{5}\right),\ x \in S,\ y \in \mathbb{R}\}$$ Then, the sum of all the elements in the range of $$\mathbb{R}$$ is equal to :
The relation is $$R = \{(x, y) : \ln y = x \ln(2/5), x \in S = \mathbb{N} \cup \{0\}, y \in \mathbb{R}\}$$.
From $$\ln y = x \ln(2/5)$$, we get $$y = e^{x\ln(2/5)} = (2/5)^x$$.
The range of R is the set of all $$y$$ values: $$\{(2/5)^x : x \in \{0, 1, 2, 3, ...\}\}$$
$$= \{1, 2/5, 4/25, 8/125, ...\}$$
This is an infinite geometric series with first term $$a = 1$$ and common ratio $$r = 2/5$$:
$$ \text{Sum} = \frac{1}{1 - 2/5} = \frac{1}{3/5} = \frac{5}{3} $$
The correct answer is Option 4: $$\frac{5}{3}$$.
$$ \text{Let } A=\left\{1, 2, 3,....,10\right\} \text{ and }B=\left\{ \frac {m}{n},n \in A,m < n \text{ and }gcd(m,n)=1\right\}.$$ Then n(B) is equal to:
In the set B, the elements are fractions $$\dfrac{m}{n}$$ such that, $$n$$ can take the values from {1,2,...,10} and $$m$$ has to be less than $$n$$ and, $$m$$ and $$n$$ must be co-primes.
Euler's totient function represents the count of positive integers less than a given integer $$n$$ that are co-prime to $$n$$.
If $$n$$ is represented as,
$$n\ =\ p_1^a\ \times\ p_2^b\ \times\ p_3^c\ ...$$ where $$p_1,\ p_2,\ p_3..\ $$ are primes.
$$Φ\left(n\right)\ =\ n\left(1-\dfrac{1}{p_1}\right)\left(1-\dfrac{1}{p_2}\right)\left(1-\dfrac{1}{p_3}\right)...$$
When $$n$$ is prime, $$Φ(n)=n-1$$
$$n\left(B\right)=Φ\left(10\right)+\ Φ\left(9\right)\ +\ ...\ +\ Φ\left(2\right)$$
We are not including $$Φ(1)$$, as there are no integers less than 1 that are co-prime to 1.
$$Φ\left(10\right)$$: $$10=2\times5$$
$$Φ(10)=10\left(1-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(1-\dfrac{1}{5}\right)\ =\ 10\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(\dfrac{4}{5}\right)\ =\ 4$$
$$Φ\left(9\right)$$: $$9=3^2$$
$$Φ(9)=9\left(1-\dfrac{1}{3}\right)\ =\ 6$$
$$Φ\left(8\right)$$: $$8=2^3$$
$$Φ(8)=8\left(1-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\ =\ 4$$
$$Φ\left(7\right)$$: $$7$$ is prime
$$Φ(7)=6$$
$$Φ\left(6\right)$$: $$6=2\times3$$
$$Φ(6)=6\left(1-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(1-\dfrac{1}{3}\right)\ =\ 6\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\left(\dfrac{2}{3}\right)\ =\ 2$$
$$Φ\left(5\right)$$: $$5$$ is prime
$$Φ(5)=4$$
$$Φ\left(4\right)$$: $$4=2^2$$
$$Φ(4)=4\left(1-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\ =\ 2$$
$$Φ\left(3\right)$$: $$3$$ is prime
$$Φ(3)=2$$
$$Φ\left(2\right)$$: $$2$$ is prime
$$Φ(2)=1$$
$$n\left(B\right)=Φ\left(10\right)+\ Φ\left(9\right)\ +\ ...\ +\ Φ\left(2\right)=\ 4\ +\ 6\ +\ 4\ +\ 6\ +\ 2\ +\ 4\ +\ 2\ +\ 2\ +\ 1\ =\ 31$$
Hence, the correct answer is option B.
Consider the sets $$A = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} : x^2 + y^2 = 25\}$$, $$B = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} : x^2 + 9y^2 = 144\}$$, $$C = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} : x^2 + y^2 \le 4\}$$, and $$D = A \cap B$$. The total number of one-one functions from the set D to the set C is:
The set $$A$$ is the circle with radius $$5$$ centred at the origin: $$x^2 + y^2 = 25$$.
The set $$B$$ is the ellipse $$x^2 + 9y^2 = 144$$ whose semi-axes are $$12$$ along the $$x$$-axis and $$4$$ along the $$y$$-axis.
To obtain $$D = A \cap B$$ we solve the two equations simultaneously.
From the circle, $$x^2 = 25 - y^2$$ $$-(1)$$. Substitute $$-(1)$$ into the ellipse:
$$25 - y^2 + 9y^2 = 144$$
$$25 + 8y^2 = 144$$
$$8y^2 = 119$$
$$y^2 = \frac{119}{8}$$, so $$y = \pm \sqrt{\frac{119}{8}}$$.
Using $$-(1)$$,
$$x^2 = 25 - \frac{119}{8} = \frac{81}{8}$$, hence $$x = \pm \sqrt{\frac{81}{8}} = \pm \frac{9\sqrt{2}}{4}$$.
Both $$x$$ and $$y$$ can take their signs independently, giving the four intersection points
$$\left(\pm\frac{9\sqrt{2}}{4}, \; \pm\sqrt{\frac{119}{8}}\right).$$
Therefore, $$|D| = 4$$.
Next, count the elements of $$C = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} : x^2 + y^2 \le 4\}$$.
List all integer pairs inside or on the circle of radius $$2$$:
• For $$y = 0$$: $$x = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2$$ → $$5$$ points.
• For $$y = \pm 1$$: $$x^2 \le 3$$ → $$x = -1, 0, 1$$ → $$3 + 3 = 6$$ points.
• For $$y = \pm 2$$: $$x^2 \le 0$$ → $$x = 0$$ → $$1 + 1 = 2$$ points.
Total: $$5 + 6 + 2 = 13$$, so $$|C| = 13$$.
We need one-one (injective) functions from a $$4$$-element set $$D$$ to a $$13$$-element set $$C$$. For an injective function, choose the image of each element of $$D$$ as follows:
• First element: $$13$$ choices.
• Second element: $$12$$ choices.
• Third element: $$11$$ choices.
• Fourth element: $$10$$ choices.
Hence the total number of injective functions is the permutation
$$13 \times 12 \times 11 \times 10 = 17160.$$
Therefore, the required number of one-one functions is $$17160$$.
Option C is correct.
Let $$A={(x,y) \in R\times R : |x+y|\geq 3}$$ and $$B={(x,y) \in R\times R : |x|+|y|\leq 3}$$. If $$C={(x,y) \in A ∩ B : x=0$$ or $$y=0},then \sum_{(x,y)\in C}^{}|x+y|$$ is :
We need to find the points in $$A \cap B$$ where x=0 or y=0, and then compute $$\sum |x+y|$$ for those points.
The sets are defined by $$A = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} : |x+y| \geq 3\}$$, $$B = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} : |x|+|y| \leq 3\}$$, and we consider $$C = \{(x,y) \in A \cap B : x = 0 \text{ or } y = 0\}$$.
If x=0, then from A we have $$|y| \geq 3$$ and from B we have $$|y| \leq 3$$, which together imply $$|y| = 3$$, so y=3 or y=-3, giving the points $$(0,3)$$ and $$(0,-3)$$.
If y=0, then from A we have $$|x| \geq 3$$ and from B we have $$|x| \leq 3$$, which together imply $$|x| = 3$$, so x=3 or x=-3, giving the points $$(3,0)$$ and $$(-3,0)$$.
Thus $$C = \{(0,3), (0,-3), (3,0), (-3,0)\}$$.
It follows that $$\sum_{(x,y) \in C} |x+y| = |0+3| + |0-3| + |3+0| + |-3+0| = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12.$$
The correct answer is Option 4: 12.
Let $$f=\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$ be a function defined by $$f(x)=(2+3a)x^{2}+(\frac{a+2}{a-1})x+b,a\neq 1$$ If $$f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)+1-\frac{2}{7}xy$$, then the value of $$28\sum_{i=1}^{5}|f(i)|$$ is
Given $$f(x) = (2+3a)x^2 + \frac{a+2}{a-1}x + b$$ and $$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + 1 - \frac{2}{7}xy$$.
Setting $$x = y = 0$$ yields $$f(0) = 2f(0) + 1$$, which gives $$f(0) = b = -1$$.
Comparing the coefficients of $$xy$$ in the functional equation results in $$2(2+3a) = -\frac{2}{7}$$, so $$a = -\frac{5}{7}$$.
Substituting this value of $$a$$ into the expressions for the coefficients gives $$2+3a = -\frac{1}{7}$$ and $$\frac{a+2}{a-1} = \frac{9/7}{-12/7} = -\frac{3}{4}$$, hence $$f(x) = -\frac{1}{7}x^2 - \frac{3}{4}x - 1$$.
Evaluating this function at integers from 1 to 5 yields $$f(1) = -\frac{1}{7} - \frac{3}{4} - 1 = -\frac{53}{28}$$, $$f(2) = -\frac{4}{7} - \frac{3}{2} - 1 = -\frac{86}{28}$$, $$f(3) = -\frac{9}{7} - \frac{9}{4} - 1 = -\frac{127}{28}$$, $$f(4) = -\frac{16}{7} - 3 - 1 = -\frac{176}{28}$$, and $$f(5) = -\frac{25}{7} - \frac{15}{4} - 1 = -\frac{233}{28}$$. Since all these values are negative, $$\sum|f(i)| = \frac{53+86+127+176+233}{28} = \frac{675}{28}$$.
Multiplying by 28 gives $$28 \times \frac{675}{28} = 675$$.
The correct answer is Option 4: 675.
The relation $$R=\left\{(x,y):x,y \in \mathbb{Z}\text{ and }x+y\text{ is even}\right\}$$ is:
R = {(x,y): x+y is even}. Reflexive: x+x=2x (even) ✓. Symmetric: if x+y even, y+x even ✓. Transitive: if x+y and y+z are even, then x+z = (x+y)+(y+z)-2y (even) ✓.
The correct answer is Option 2: equivalence relation.
Let $$ S=\{p_1,p_2,....,p_{10}\} $$ be the set of first ten prime numbers. Let $$ A=S\cup P, $$ where $$ P $$ is the set of all possible products of distinct elements of $$ S. $$ Then the number of all ordered pairs $$ (x,y),\; x\in S,\; y\in A, $$ such that $$ x $$ divides $$ y,$$ is: $$ \underline{ \hspace{2cm} } $$
S = set of first 10 primes. A = S ∪ P where P = all possible products of distinct elements of S. Find ordered pairs (x,y) where x∈S, y∈A, x|y.
A consists of S (the 10 primes) plus all products of 2 or more distinct primes from S. Total elements in A = $$2^{10} - 1 = 1023$$ (all non-empty subsets of S, each giving a unique product).
For each prime $$p_i \in S$$, count elements y ∈ A such that $$p_i | y$$.
y is a product of a non-empty subset of S. For $$p_i | y$$, the subset must contain $$p_i$$.
Number of such subsets = $$2^9 = 512$$ (choose any subset of the remaining 9 primes, including empty set, and include $$p_i$$).
Total ordered pairs
Each of the 10 primes in S contributes 512 pairs.
Total = $$10 \times 512 = 5120$$
The answer is 5120.
Let A = {1, 2, 3}. The number of relations on A, containing (1,2) and (2,3), which are reflexive and transitive but not symmetric, is ______ -
We need to find the number of relations on $$A = \{1,2,3\}$$ that contain $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$, are reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric.
Reflexivity requires the pairs $$(1,1), (2,2), (3,3)$$. Since $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$ are given, transitivity forces us to include $$(1,3)$$. Thus the base set of pairs is $$\{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,3),(1,3)\}$$.
Aside from these, the only remaining possible ordered pairs on $$A$$ are $$(2,1), (3,2), (3,1)$$. We examine which subsets of these can be added without violating transitivity and while ensuring the relation remains not symmetric.
If we add none of these extra pairs, the relation is already transitive and is not symmetric because $$(1,2)$$ is present but $$(2,1)$$ is absent. This case is valid.
If we add only $$(2,1)$$, then checking transitivity: $$(2,1)\circ(1,2)=(2,2)$$ ✓, $$(2,1)\circ(1,3)=(2,3)$$ ✓, and all other composites are already accounted for. Since $$(2,3)$$ is present without $$(3,2)$$, the relation remains not symmetric, so this case is valid.
If we add only $$(3,2)$$, then $$(3,2)\circ(2,3)=(3,3)$$ ✓, $$(1,3)\circ(3,2)=(1,2)$$ ✓, and all necessary closures hold. Because $$(1,2)$$ appears without $$(2,1)$$, the relation is not symmetric, so this case is valid.
If we add only $$(3,1)$$, transitivity would require $$(3,1)\circ(1,2)=(3,2)$$ to be present, but it is not. Therefore this case fails transitivity and is invalid.
If we add $$(2,1)$$ and $$(3,2)$$, then transitivity demands $$(3,2)\circ(2,1)=(3,1)$$, which is missing, so this case is invalid.
If we add $$(2,1)$$ and $$(3,1)$$, then $$(3,1)\circ(1,2)=(3,2)$$ must be present but is not, making this case invalid.
If we add $$(3,2)$$ and $$(3,1)$$, then $$(2,3)\circ(3,1)=(2,1)$$ is required and is missing, so this case is invalid.
If we add all three extra pairs $$(2,1),(3,2),(3,1)$$, the relation is transitive but becomes symmetric since every pair has its reverse, which is forbidden. Hence this case is invalid.
Out of the eight possibilities, only three yield relations that are reflexive, transitive, contain $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$, and are not symmetric. Therefore, the answer is 3.
Let the domain of the function $$f(x) = \cos^{-1}\left(\frac{4x+5}{3x-7}\right)$$ be $$[\alpha, \beta]$$ and the domain of $$g(x) = \log_2(2 - 6\log_{27}(2x+5))$$ be $$(\gamma, \delta)$$. Then $$|7(\alpha + \beta) + 4(\gamma + \delta)|$$ is equal to _____.
Number of functions $$ f:\{1,2,\ldots,100\}\to\{0,1\} $$ that assign 1 to exactly one of the positive integers less than or equal to 98 is equal to______________
.
Functions f:{1,...,100}→{0,1} assigning 1 to exactly one integer ≤ 98.
Choose which of 1-98 gets value 1: 98 ways. For positions 99,100: each can be 0 or 1, but we need exactly one value of 1 among 1-98. Positions 99 and 100 can be 0 or 1 freely: 4 choices.
Total = 98 × 4 = 392.
The answer is 392.
Let $$A = \{(\alpha, \beta) \in \mathbf{R} \times \mathbf{R} : |\alpha - 1| \le 4 \text{ and } |\beta - 5| \le 6\}$$ and $$B = \{(\alpha, \beta) \in \mathbf{R} \times \mathbf{R} : 16(\alpha - 2)^2 + 9(\beta - 6)^2 \le 144\}$$. Then
Let $$X=R\times R$$ Define a relation R on X as : $$(a_{1},b_{1})R(a_{2},b_{2}) \Leftrightarrow b_{1}=b_{2}$$ Statement I : R is an equivalence relation. Statement II : For some $$(a,b) \in X$$, the set $$S={(x,y) \in X : (x,y)R(a,b)}$$ represents a line parallel to y=x In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below :
We need to evaluate two statements about the relation R on $$X = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}$$.
Relation: $$(a_1, b_1) R (a_2, b_2) \Leftrightarrow b_1 = b_2$$
Statement I: R is an equivalence relation.
Check reflexive: $$(a,b) R (a,b)$$ since $$b = b$$. TRUE.
Check symmetric: If $$(a_1,b_1) R (a_2,b_2)$$, then $$b_1 = b_2$$, so $$b_2 = b_1$$, hence $$(a_2,b_2) R (a_1,b_1)$$. TRUE.
Check transitive: If $$(a_1,b_1) R (a_2,b_2)$$ and $$(a_2,b_2) R (a_3,b_3)$$, then $$b_1 = b_2$$ and $$b_2 = b_3$$, so $$b_1 = b_3$$, hence $$(a_1,b_1) R (a_3,b_3)$$. TRUE.
Statement I is TRUE.
Statement II: For some (a,b) in X, the set S = {(x,y) in X : (x,y) R (a,b)} represents a line parallel to y = x.
$$S = \{(x,y) : y = b\}$$
This is a horizontal line (parallel to the x-axis), not a line parallel to y = x.
The line y = x has slope 1. The line y = b has slope 0. These are not parallel for any value of b.
Statement II is FALSE.
The correct answer is Option 2: Statement I is true but Statement II is false.
Let $$A=\left\{x\in(0,\pi) -\left\{\frac{\pi}{2}\right\} :\log_{(2/\pi)}|\sin x| + \log_{(2/\pi)}|\cos x| = 2 \right\}$$ and $$B=\left\{x\geq0 : \sqrt{x}(\sqrt{x}-4) - 3|\sqrt{x}-2| + 6 = 0 \right\}.$$ Then $$n(A\cup B)$$ is equal to:
We need to find $$n(A \cup B)$$ where:
$$A = \{x \in (0,\pi) \setminus \{\pi/2\} : \log_{2/\pi}|\sin x| + \log_{2/\pi}|\cos x| = 2\}$$
$$B = \{x \geq 0 : \sqrt{x}(\sqrt{x}-4) - 3|\sqrt{x}-2| + 6 = 0\}$$
Set A: $$\log_{2/\pi}|\sin x| + \log_{2/\pi}|\cos x| = 2$$
$$\log_{2/\pi}(|\sin x||\cos x|) = 2$$
$$|\sin x\cos x| = (2/\pi)^2 = 4/\pi^2$$
$$\frac{1}{2}|\sin 2x| = 4/\pi^2$$, so $$|\sin 2x| = 8/\pi^2$$.
Since $$8/\pi^2 \approx 0.811$$, and $$\sin 2x$$ achieves this value in $$(0, \pi)$$:
For $$x \in (0, \pi/2)$$: $$2x \in (0, \pi)$$, and $$\sin 2x = 8/\pi^2$$ has 2 solutions.
For $$x \in (\pi/2, \pi)$$: $$2x \in (\pi, 2\pi)$$, and $$|\sin 2x| = 8/\pi^2$$ has 2 solutions.
So $$|A| = 4$$.
Set B: Let $$t = \sqrt{x} \geq 0$$. The equation becomes:
$$t(t-4) - 3|t-2| + 6 = 0$$
$$t^2 - 4t + 6 - 3|t-2| = 0$$
Case 1: $$t \geq 2$$: $$t^2 - 4t + 6 - 3(t-2) = 0 \Rightarrow t^2 - 7t + 12 = 0 \Rightarrow (t-3)(t-4) = 0$$. So $$t = 3$$ or $$t = 4$$, giving $$x = 9$$ or $$x = 16$$.
Case 2: $$0 \leq t < 2$$: $$t^2 - 4t + 6 - 3(2-t) = 0 \Rightarrow t^2 - t = 0 \Rightarrow t(t-1) = 0$$. So $$t = 0$$ or $$t = 1$$, giving $$x = 0$$ or $$x = 1$$.
So $$B = \{0, 1, 9, 16\}$$, $$|B| = 4$$.
Sets A and B are disjoint (A contains values in $$(0, \pi)$$ which are irrational, B contains integers).
$$n(A \cup B) = |A| + |B| = 4 + 4 = 8$$.
The correct answer is Option B: 8.
Define a relation R on the interval $$[0,\frac{\pi}{2})$$ by $$xRy$$ if and only if$$\sec^{2} x-\tan^{2} y=1$$. Then R is :
We use the identity $$\sec^2 \theta = 1 + \tan^2 \theta$$. The condition becomes:
$$(1 + \tan^2 x) - \tan^2 y = 1 \implies \tan^2 x = \tan^2 y$$
• Reflexive: $$\tan^2 x = \tan^2 x$$ is always true. (Reflexive)
• Symmetric: If $$\tan^2 x = \tan^2 y$$, then $$\tan^2 y = \tan^2 x$$. (Symmetric)
• Transitive: If $$\tan^2 x = \tan^2 y$$ and $$\tan^2 y = \tan^2 z$$, then $$\tan^2 x = \tan^2 z$$. (Transitive)
Since it satisfies all three, $$R$$ is an equivalence relation.
Correct Option: B
If the range of the function $$f(x) = \frac{5 - x}{x^2 - 3x + 2}$$, $$x \ne 1, 2$$, is $$(-\infty, \alpha] \cup [\beta, \infty)$$, then $$\alpha^2 + \beta^2$$ is equal to :
Let the given function be $$y = f(x) = \frac{5 - x}{x^{2} - 3x + 2}$$, where $$x \neq 1,\,2$$ because the denominator $$x^{2} - 3x + 2 = (x - 1)(x - 2)$$ vanishes at these points.
To find the range we eliminate $$x$$.
Cross-multiply:
$$y(x^{2} - 3x + 2) = 5 - x$$
Rearrange into a quadratic in $$x$$:
$$y x^{2} - 3y x + 2y + x - 5 = 0$$
Group like terms:
$$y x^{2} + (-3y + 1)x + (2y - 5) = 0 \quad -(1)$$
For a given real $$y$$ to lie in the range, equation $$(1)$$ must have at least one real root $$x$$ that is different from $$1$$ and $$2$$. The first requirement is that its discriminant is non-negative.
Discriminant $$\Delta$$ of $$(1)$$:
$$\Delta = (-3y + 1)^{2} - 4y(2y - 5)$$
Simplify:
$$\Delta = 9y^{2} - 6y + 1 - 8y^{2} + 20y = y^{2} + 14y + 1$$
Thus real roots exist when
$$y^{2} + 14y + 1 \ge 0 \quad -(2)$$
Factor $$(2)$$ by finding its roots. Solve
$$y^{2} + 14y + 1 = 0$$
Roots:
$$y = \frac{-14 \pm \sqrt{14^{2} - 4 \cdot 1 \cdot 1}}{2} = \frac{-14 \pm \sqrt{196 - 4}}{2} = \frac{-14 \pm \sqrt{192}}{2} = -7 \pm 4\sqrt{3}$$
Denote
$$\alpha = -7 - 4\sqrt{3}, \qquad \beta = -7 + 4\sqrt{3}$$
Since the coefficient of $$y^{2}$$ in $$(2)$$ is positive, the inequality $$\Delta \ge 0$$ holds outside the interval formed by these roots:
$$y \le \alpha \quad \text{or} \quad y \ge \beta$$
Hence the range is $$(-\infty,\,\alpha] \cup [\beta,\,\infty)$$ as stated.
Now compute $$\alpha^{2} + \beta^{2}$$.
For the quadratic $$y^{2} + 14y + 1 = 0$$:
Sum of roots $$\alpha + \beta = -14$$
Product of roots $$\alpha\beta = 1$$
Use the identity $$\alpha^{2} + \beta^{2} = (\alpha + \beta)^{2} - 2\alpha\beta$$:
$$\alpha^{2} + \beta^{2} = (-14)^{2} - 2 \cdot 1 = 196 - 2 = 194$$
Therefore, $$\alpha^{2} + \beta^{2} = 194$$.
Answer: Option D
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 100\}$$ and R be a relation on A such that $$R = \{(a, b) : a = 2b + 1\}$$. Let $$(a_1, a_2), (a_2, a_3), (a_3, a_4), \ldots, (a_k, a_{k+1})$$ be a sequence of k elements of R such that the second entry of an ordered pair is equal to the first entry of the next ordered pair. Then the largest integer k, for which such a sequence exists, is equal to :
We are given $$A = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 100\}$$ and the relation $$R = \{(a, b) : a = 2b + 1\}$$ on $$A$$.
Step 1: Identify all ordered pairs in R
For $$(a, b) \in R$$, we need $$a = 2b + 1$$ where both $$a$$ and $$b$$ are in $$A$$.
Since $$a = 2b + 1$$, $$a$$ must be odd. The valid pairs are:
$$(3, 1), (5, 2), (7, 3), (9, 4), (11, 5), (13, 6), \ldots, (99, 49)$$
That is, for each $$b$$ from $$1$$ to $$49$$, we get the pair $$(2b+1, b)$$.
Step 2: Understand the chain condition
We need a sequence $$(a_1, a_2), (a_2, a_3), (a_3, a_4), \ldots, (a_k, a_{k+1})$$ of $$k$$ elements of $$R$$ such that the second entry of each pair equals the first entry of the next pair.
This means: $$a_1 = 2a_2 + 1$$, $$a_2 = 2a_3 + 1$$, $$a_3 = 2a_4 + 1$$, and so on.
Step 3: Express $$a_1$$ in terms of $$a_{k+1}$$
From the recurrence $$a_i = 2a_{i+1} + 1$$, we can write:
$$a_1 = 2a_2 + 1 = 2(2a_3 + 1) + 1 = 4a_3 + 3$$
$$a_1 = 4(2a_4 + 1) + 3 = 8a_4 + 7$$
In general: $$a_1 = 2^k \cdot a_{k+1} + (2^k - 1)$$
Step 4: Find the maximum $$k$$
We need $$a_1 \leq 100$$ and $$a_{k+1} \geq 1$$.
Setting $$a_{k+1} = 1$$ (the smallest possible value):
$$a_1 = 2^k \cdot 1 + (2^k - 1) = 2^{k+1} - 1$$
We need $$2^{k+1} - 1 \leq 100$$, so $$2^{k+1} \leq 101$$.
Checking: $$2^6 = 64 \leq 101$$ ✓ and $$2^7 = 128 \gt 101$$ ✗
So $$k + 1 \leq 6$$, which gives $$k \leq 5$$.
Step 5: Verify with $$k = 5$$
With $$k = 5$$ and $$a_6 = 1$$:
$$a_6 = 1, \quad a_5 = 2(1) + 1 = 3, \quad a_4 = 2(3) + 1 = 7$$
$$a_3 = 2(7) + 1 = 15, \quad a_2 = 2(15) + 1 = 31, \quad a_1 = 2(31) + 1 = 63$$
The chain is: $$(63, 31), (31, 15), (15, 7), (7, 3), (3, 1)$$
All values are in $$A = \{1, 2, \ldots, 100\}$$ ✓
Therefore, the largest integer $$k$$ is $$\mathbf{5}$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let $$A = \{-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\}$$ and $$R$$ be a relation on $$A$$ defined by $$xRy$$ if and only if $$2x - y \in \{0, 1\}$$. Let $$l$$ be the number of elements in $$R$$. Let $$m$$ and $$n$$ be the minimum number of elements required to be added in $$R$$ to make it reflexive and symmetric, respectively. Then $$l + m + n$$ is equal to :
The set is $$A=\{-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3\}$$, so $$|A|=7$$.
The relation $$R$$ is defined by $$xRy \iff 2x-y\in\{0,1\}$$, i.e. $$y=2x$$ or $$y=2x-1$$.
Case 1: $$y=2x$$
Check each $$x\in A$$:
$$\begin{array}{c|c} x & 2x \\ \hline -3 & -6\;(\notin A)\\ -2 & -4\;(\notin A)\\ -1 & -2\;(\in A)\\ 0 & 0\;(\in A)\\ 1 & 2\;(\in A)\\ 2 & 4\;(\notin A)\\ 3 & 6\;(\notin A) \end{array}$$
Pairs obtained: $$(-1,-2),\,(0,0),\,(1,2).$$
Case 2: $$y=2x-1$$
Again test every $$x$$:
$$\begin{array}{c|c} x & 2x-1 \\ \hline -3 & -7\;(\notin A)\\ -2 & -5\;(\notin A)\\ -1 & -3\;(\in A)\\ 0 & -1\;(\in A)\\ 1 & 1\;(\in A)\\ 2 & 3\;(\in A)\\ 3 & 5\;(\notin A) \end{array}$$
Pairs obtained: $$(-1,-3),\,(0,-1),\,(1,1),\,(2,3).$$
Combining both cases, $$R$$ contains
$$\{(-1,-2),\,(-1,-3),\,(0,0),\,(0,-1),\,(1,2),\,(1,1),\,(2,3)\}.$$
Number of elements in $$R$$: $$l=7.$$
Making $$R$$ reflexive
A relation is reflexive when every $$a\in A$$ satisfies $$(a,a)\in R$$.
Present self-pairs: $$(0,0),\,(1,1).$$
Missing self-pairs: $$(-3,-3),\,(-2,-2),\,(-1,-1),\,(2,2),\,(3,3).$$
Minimum additions needed: $$m=5.$$
Making $$R$$ symmetric
For symmetry, whenever $$(a,b)\in R$$ we also need $$(b,a).$$
List missing converse pairs:
$$(-1,-2)\;\Rightarrow\;(-2,-1)$$
$$(-1,-3)\;\Rightarrow\;(-3,-1)$$
$$(0,-1)\;\Rightarrow\;(-1,0)$$
$$(1,2)\;\Rightarrow\;(2,1)$$
$$(2,3)\;\Rightarrow\;(3,2)$$
All five are distinct and not already in $$R$$, so
minimum additions required: $$n=5.$$
Finally,
$$l+m+n = 7+5+5 = 17.$$
Hence $$l + m + n = 17$$ ⇒ Option B.
Let $$A = \{-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\}$$. Let R be a relation on A defined by $$xRy$$ if and only if $$0 \leq x^2 + 2y \leq 4$$. Let $$l$$ be the number of elements in R and $$m$$ be the minimum number of elements required to be added in R to make it a reflexive relation. Then $$l + m$$ is equal to
We have $$A = \{-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\}$$ and the relation $$R$$ on $$A$$ defined by $$xRy$$ if and only if $$0 \leq x^2 + 2y \leq 4$$.
For a given $$x$$, the condition $$0 \leq x^2 + 2y \leq 4$$ gives us:
$$-x^2 \leq 2y \leq 4 - x^2$$
$$\frac{-x^2}{2} \leq y \leq \frac{4 - x^2}{2}$$
We check each value of $$x$$ in $$A$$:
Case 1: $$x = -3$$ (so $$x^2 = 9$$)
We need $$0 \leq 9 + 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$-4.5 \leq y \leq -2.5$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{-3\}$$.
Pairs: $$(-3, -3)$$. Count = 1.
Case 2: $$x = -2$$ (so $$x^2 = 4$$)
We need $$0 \leq 4 + 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$-2 \leq y \leq 0$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{-2, -1, 0\}$$.
Pairs: $$(-2, -2), (-2, -1), (-2, 0)$$. Count = 3.
Case 3: $$x = -1$$ (so $$x^2 = 1$$)
We need $$0 \leq 1 + 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$-0.5 \leq y \leq 1.5$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{0, 1\}$$.
Pairs: $$(-1, 0), (-1, 1)$$. Count = 2.
Case 4: $$x = 0$$ (so $$x^2 = 0$$)
We need $$0 \leq 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$0 \leq y \leq 2$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{0, 1, 2\}$$.
Pairs: $$(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2)$$. Count = 3.
Case 5: $$x = 1$$ (so $$x^2 = 1$$)
We need $$0 \leq 1 + 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$-0.5 \leq y \leq 1.5$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{0, 1\}$$.
Pairs: $$(1, 0), (1, 1)$$. Count = 2.
Case 6: $$x = 2$$ (so $$x^2 = 4$$)
We need $$0 \leq 4 + 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$-2 \leq y \leq 0$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{-2, -1, 0\}$$.
Pairs: $$(2, -2), (2, -1), (2, 0)$$. Count = 3.
Case 7: $$x = 3$$ (so $$x^2 = 9$$)
We need $$0 \leq 9 + 2y \leq 4$$, which gives $$-4.5 \leq y \leq -2.5$$.
From $$A$$, the valid values are $$y \in \{-3\}$$.
Pairs: $$(3, -3)$$. Count = 1.
So the total number of elements in $$R$$ is:
$$l = 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 1 = 15$$
Now we find $$m$$, the minimum number of elements to be added to make $$R$$ reflexive. For reflexivity, we need $$(x, x) \in R$$ for every $$x \in A$$. Let us check which diagonal pairs are already in $$R$$:
$$(-3, -3)$$: $$9 + 2(-3) = 3$$. Since $$0 \leq 3 \leq 4$$, this is in $$R$$. ✓
$$(-2, -2)$$: $$4 + 2(-2) = 0$$. Since $$0 \leq 0 \leq 4$$, this is in $$R$$. ✓
$$(-1, -1)$$: $$1 + 2(-1) = -1$$. Since $$-1 \lt 0$$, this is NOT in $$R$$. ✗
$$(0, 0)$$: $$0 + 2(0) = 0$$. Since $$0 \leq 0 \leq 4$$, this is in $$R$$. ✓
$$(1, 1)$$: $$1 + 2(1) = 3$$. Since $$0 \leq 3 \leq 4$$, this is in $$R$$. ✓
$$(2, 2)$$: $$4 + 2(2) = 8$$. Since $$8 \gt 4$$, this is NOT in $$R$$. ✗
$$(3, 3)$$: $$9 + 2(3) = 15$$. Since $$15 \gt 4$$, this is NOT in $$R$$. ✗
We need to add 3 pairs: $$(-1, -1), (2, 2), (3, 3)$$. So $$m = 3$$.
Therefore, $$l + m = 15 + 3 = 18$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$A = \{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\}$$. Let R be a relation on A defined by $$xRy$$ if and only if $$y = \max\{x, 1\}$$. Let $$\ell$$ be the number of elements in R. Let m and n be the minimum number of elements required to be added in R to make it reflexive and symmetric relations, respectively. Then $$\ell + m + n$$ is equal to
The given set is $$A=\{-2,-1,0,1,2,3\}$$, so $$|A|=6$$.
Relation $$R$$ is defined by $$xRy \Longleftrightarrow y=\max\{x,1\}$$.
Step 1 - List the ordered pairs in $$R$$
• If $$x\lt 1$$ (i.e. $$x=-2,-1,0$$), then $$\max\{x,1\}=1$$, hence $$y=1$$.
• If $$x\ge 1$$ (i.e. $$x=1,2,3$$), then $$\max\{x,1\}=x$$, hence $$y=x$$.
Therefore
$$R=\{(-2,1),(-1,1),(0,1),(1,1),(2,2),(3,3)\}.$$
The number of elements in $$R$$ is
$$\ell = 6.$$
Step 2 - Make $$R$$ reflexive
A relation is reflexive if $$(a,a)\in R$$ for every $$a\in A$$.
Pairs already present: $$(1,1),(2,2),(3,3).$$
Missing reflexive pairs: $$(-2,-2),(-1,-1),(0,0).$$
Hence the minimum number of pairs to be added is
$$m = 3.$$
Step 3 - Make $$R$$ symmetric
A relation is symmetric if $$(a,b)\in R \Longrightarrow (b,a)\in R.$$
Check each pair in $$R$$:
• $$(1,1),(2,2),(3,3)$$ are self-symmetric.
• $$(-2,1)$$ needs $$(1,-2).$$
• $$(-1,1)$$ needs $$(1,-1).$$
• $(0,1)$$ needs $$(1,0).$$
These three required pairs are not in $$R$$, so we must add exactly three of them. Thus
$$n = 3.$$
Step 4 - Compute $$\ell + m + n$$
$$\ell + m + n = 6 + 3 + 3 = 12.$$
Therefore, $$\ell + m + n = 12$$, which corresponds to Option A.
Let $$\mathbb{N}$$ denote the set of all natural numbers, and $$\mathbb{Z}$$ denote the set of all integers. Consider the functions $$f: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Z}$$ and $$g: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{N}$$ defined by
$$f(n) = \begin{cases} (n+1)/2 & \text{if } n \text{ is odd}, \\ (4-n)/2 & \text{if } n \text{ is even}, \end{cases}$$
and
$$g(n) = \begin{cases} 3 + 2n & \text{if } n \geq 0, \\ -2n & \text{if } n < 0. \end{cases}$$
Define $$(g \circ f)(n) = g(f(n))$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$, and $$(f \circ g)(n) = f(g(n))$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{Z}$$.
Then which of the following statements is (are) TRUE?
For convenience let $$\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,3,\dots\}$$ and $$\mathbb{Z}=\{\dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,\dots\}$$.
1. Properties of $$f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}$$
• If $$n$$ is odd, write $$n=2k-1\;(k\ge 1)$$. Then
$$f(n)=\frac{n+1}{2}=\frac{2k-1+1}{2}=k,$$
which produces all positive integers $$1,2,3,\dots$$.
• If $$n$$ is even, write $$n=2k\;(k\ge 1)$$. Then
$$f(n)=\frac{4-n}{2}=\frac{4-2k}{2}=2-k,$$
which produces the values
$$1,0,-1,-2,-3,\dots$$.
Combining the two cases, the image of $$f$$ is all of $$\mathbb{Z}$$, so $$f$$ is onto.
However, $$f(1)=\frac{1+1}{2}=1,\quad f(2)=\frac{4-2}{2}=1,$$ and $$1\ne 2$$. Hence distinct inputs can give the same output, so $$f$$ is not one-one.
Conclusion for $$f$$: not one-one, but onto ⇒ Option D is true.
2. Properties of $$g:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{N}$$
• $$n\ge 0$$: $$g(n)=3+2n=3,5,7,9,\dots$$ (all odd numbers $$\ge 3$$).
• $$n\lt 0$$: write $$n=-k\;(k\ge 1)$$, then $$g(n)=-2(-k)=2k=2,4,6,8,\dots$$ (all even numbers $$\ge 2$$).
Thus $$\operatorname{Im}(g)=\{2,3,4,5,6,\dots\}=\mathbb{N}\setminus\{1\}$$, so $$g$$ is not onto.
To test injectivity, suppose $$g(n_1)=g(n_2)$$.
• If both $$n_1,n_2\ge 0$$, then $$3+2n_1=3+2n_2\Rightarrow n_1=n_2$$(strictly increasing).
• If both $$n_1,n_2\lt 0$$, write them as $$-k_1,-k_2$$. Then $$2k_1=2k_2\Rightarrow k_1=k_2\Rightarrow n_1=n_2$$.
• If one is $$\ge 0$$ and the other $$\lt 0$$, their images have opposite parity (odd vs even), so equality is impossible.
Therefore $$g$$ is one-one.
Conclusion for $$g$$: one-one, but not onto ⇒ Option C is false.
3. The composition $$g\circ f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$$
First compute the value explicitly.
$$f(n)=k\quad(\text{positive})$$
$$g(f(n))=g(k)=3+2k$$
Hence $$g\circ f(n)=3+2k$$, i.e. the numbers $$5,7,9,\dots$$.
$$f(n)=2-k$$
If $$k=1$$, $$f(n)=1,\;g(1)=5$$ (already obtained).
If $$k=2$$, $$f(n)=0,\;g(0)=3$$.
If $$k\ge 3$$, $$f(n)=2-k\le -1,\;g(2-k)=2k-4$$ (even numbers $$2,4,6,8,\dots$$).
The total image of $$g\circ f$$ is therefore $$\{2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,\dots\}=\mathbb{N}\setminus\{1\},$$ so $$g\circ f$$ is not onto.
Also $$g\circ f(1)=5$$ and $$g\circ f(2)=5$$, yet $$1\ne 2$$, so the composition is not one-one.
Conclusion for $$g\circ f$$: neither one-one nor onto ⇒ Option A is true.
4. The composition $$f\circ g:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}$$
Case 1: $$n\ge 0$$.$$g(n)=3+2n\;(\text{odd})$$
$$f(g(n))=\frac{(3+2n)+1}{2}=n+2.$$
So for $$n=0,1,2,\dots$$ we obtain $$2,3,4,\dots$$.
$$g(n)=2k\;(\text{even})$$
$$f(g(n))=\frac{4-2k}{2}=2-k.$$
For $$k=1,2,3,\dots$$ this gives $$1,0,-1,-2,\dots$$.
The union of the two cases yields every integer, so $$f\circ g$$ is onto. To check injectivity, observe: • $$n\ge 0\; \Rightarrow f\circ g(n)=n+2$$ (strictly increasing). • $$n\lt 0\; \Rightarrow f\circ g(n)=2-n$$ (strictly decreasing). No non-negative input can share an image with a negative input, so different arguments always give different values. Hence $$f\circ g$$ is one-one. Therefore Option B is false.
Final result: Only Option A and Option D are correct.
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \log_e\left(\frac{2x - 3}{5 + 4x}\right) + \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{4 + 3x}{2 - x}\right)$$ is $$[\alpha, \beta)$$, then $$\alpha^2 + 4\beta$$ is equal to
For the function $$f(x)=\log_e\!\left(\dfrac{2x-3}{5+4x}\right)+\sin^{-1}\!\left(\dfrac{4+3x}{2-x}\right)$$ to be defined, two conditions must hold simultaneously:
(i) Logarithm: $$\dfrac{2x-3}{5+4x}\gt 0$$
(ii) Inverse sine: $$-1 \le \dfrac{4+3x}{2-x} \le 1$$ and $$2-x \ne 0$$ (so $$x\ne 2$$).
Condition (i):
The fraction is positive when numerator and denominator have the same sign.
Case 1 $$2x-3\gt 0\;$$ and $$\;5+4x\gt 0$$
$$x\gt \dfrac32,$$ $$x\gt -\dfrac54 \;\Rightarrow\; x\gt \dfrac32$$
Case 2 $$2x-3\lt 0\;$$ and $$\;5+4x\lt 0$$
$$x\lt \dfrac32,$$ $$x\lt -\dfrac54 \;\Rightarrow\; x\lt -\dfrac54$$
Hence, from the logarithm we get
$$x\in(-\infty,\,-\dfrac54)\;\cup\;(\dfrac32,\,\infty) \quad -(1)$$
Condition (ii): Let $$y=\dfrac{4+3x}{2-x}.$$ We solve $$-1\le y\le 1.$$ Break into two parts, keeping the sign of $$2-x$$ in mind.
(a) First inequality $$\dfrac{4+3x}{2-x}\le 1$$
• If $$x\lt 2$$ (denominator positive): multiply directly
$$4+3x\le 2-x \;\Longrightarrow\; 4x\le -2 \;\Longrightarrow\; x\le -\dfrac12.$$
• If $$x\gt 2$$ (denominator negative): inequality reverses
$$4+3x\ge 2-x \;\Longrightarrow\; 4x\ge -2 \;\Longrightarrow\; x\ge -\dfrac12.$$
Since this lies entirely above 2, the whole interval $$x\gt 2$$ satisfies part (a).
(b) Second inequality $$\dfrac{4+3x}{2-x}\ge -1$$
• If $$x\lt 2$$ (denominator positive):
$$4+3x\ge -\,\bigl(2-x\bigr) \;\Longrightarrow\; 4+3x\ge -2+x \;\Longrightarrow\; 2x\ge -6 \;\Longrightarrow\; x\ge -3.$$
• If $$x\gt 2$$ (denominator negative): inequality reverses
$$4+3x\le -\,\bigl(2-x\bigr) \;\Longrightarrow\; 2x\le -6 \;\Longrightarrow\; x\le -3,$$
which is impossible because here $$x\gt 2.$$
Thus part (b) gives $$-3\le x\lt 2.$$
Combining (a) and (b): for $$x\lt 2,$$ both must hold, giving
$$x\in[-3,\,-\dfrac12].$$
For $$x\gt 2,$$ part (b) fails, so no additional points appear.
$$x\in[-3,\,-\dfrac12] \quad -(2)$$
Overall domain: Intersect $$(1)$$ and $$(2)$$.
$$( -\infty,\,-\dfrac54)\cup(\dfrac32,\infty)\; \cap\;[-3,\,-\dfrac12] \;=\;[-3,\,-\dfrac54).$$
Therefore, the domain is $$[\alpha,\beta)=\bigl[-3,\,-\dfrac54\bigr).$$ So $$\alpha=-3,\;\beta=-\dfrac54.$$
Compute $$\alpha^2+4\beta:$$
$$\alpha^2+4\beta = (-3)^2 + 4\!\left(-\dfrac54\right)=9-5=4.$$
Hence, $$\alpha^2+4\beta=4,$$ which matches Option B.
Let the domains of the functions $$f(x) = \log_4 \log_3 \log_7 (8 - \log_2(x^2 + 4x + 5))$$ and $$g(x) = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{7x+10}{x-2}\right)$$ be $$(\alpha, \beta)$$ and $$[\gamma, \delta]$$, respectively. Then $$\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 + \delta^2$$ is equal to :
For every logarithm we must have a positive argument, and for $$\log_a(b)$$ to be positive ( $$a\gt1$$ ) the argument $$b$$ must exceed $$1$$.
We examine the functions layer by layer.
Case 1: Domain of $$f(x)=\log_{4}\!\Bigl[\;\log_{3}\!\bigl\{\log_{7}\!\bigl(8-\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\bigr)\bigr\}\Bigr]$$
Step 1 - innermost logarithm
$$x^{2}+4x+5=(x+2)^{2}+1\gt0$$ for all real $$x$$, so $$\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)$$ exists for every real $$x$$.
Step 2 - argument of $$\log_{7}$$
Let $$y=8-\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)$$. For $$\log_{7}(y)$$ to exist we need $$y\gt0$$, i.e.
$$8-\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\gt0 \;\Longrightarrow\; \log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\lt8.$$
Step 3 - argument of $$\log_{3}$$ must be positive
Let $$z=\log_{7}(y)$$. For $$\log_{3}(z)$$ to be positive we require $$z\gt1$$ (because base $$3\gt1$$). Thus
$$\log_{7}\!\bigl(8-\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\bigr)\gt1 \;\Longrightarrow\; 8-\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\gt7.$$
Step 4 - simplifying the last inequality
$$8-\log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\gt7 \;\Longrightarrow\; \log_{2}(x^{2}+4x+5)\lt1 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^{2}+4x+5\lt2.$$
Because $$x^{2}+4x+5=(x+2)^{2}+1$$, the above becomes
$$(x+2)^{2}+1\lt2 \;\Longrightarrow\; (x+2)^{2}\lt1 \;\Longrightarrow\; -1\lt x+2\lt1 \;\Longrightarrow\; -3\lt x\lt-1.$$
Hence the domain of $$f(x)$$ is $$(\alpha,\beta)=(-3,-1).$$ So $$\alpha=-3,\;\beta=-1.$$
Case 2: Domain of $$g(x)=\sin^{-1}\!\left(\dfrac{7x+10}{\,x-2\,}\right)$$
The argument of $$\sin^{-1}$$ must lie in $$[-1,1]$$ and the denominator cannot be zero.
Let $$t=\dfrac{7x+10}{x-2}$$. We need $$-1\le t\le1,\;x\ne2.$$
1) Inequality $$t\le1$$:
$$\dfrac{7x+10}{x-2}\le1 \;\Longrightarrow\; \dfrac{6(x+2)}{x-2}\le0.$$
This holds for $$-2\le x<2.$$
2) Inequality $$t\ge-1$$:
$$\dfrac{7x+10}{x-2}\ge-1 \;\Longrightarrow\; \dfrac{8(x+1)}{x-2}\ge0.$$
This is true for $$x\le-1$$ or $$x>2.$$
3) Intersection of (1) and (2):
$$[-2,2)\;\cap\;(-\infty,-1]\;=\;[-2,-1].$$
The endpoint $$x=-2$$ gives $$t=1$$ and $$x=-1$$ gives $$t=-1,$$ both allowed. Hence the domain of $$g(x)$$ is $$[\gamma,\delta]=[-2,-1]$$ with $$\gamma=-2,\;\delta=-1.$$
Case 3: Required sum
$$\alpha^2+\beta^2+\gamma^2+\delta^2 =(-3)^2+(-1)^2+(-2)^2+(-1)^2 =9+1+4+1 =15.$$
Therefore, $$\alpha^2+\beta^2+\gamma^2+\delta^2=15$$, which matches Option A.
Let the set of all relations $$R$$ on the set $$\{a, b, c, d, e, f\}$$, such that $$R$$ is reflexive and symmetric, and $$R$$ contains exactly 10 elements, be denoted by $$\mathcal{S}$$.
Then the number of elements in $$\mathcal{S}$$ is ________.
The underlying set is $$A=\{a,b,c,d,e,f\}$$ with $$|A|=6$$.
A relation on $$A$$ is a subset of $$A\times A$$. The required relations must satisfy two conditions:
1. Reflexive: for every $$x\in A$$, the ordered pair $$(x,x)$$ is in the relation. Therefore the six diagonal pairs $$\{(a,a),(b,b),(c,c),(d,d),(e,e),(f,f)\}$$ are compulsory. So each admissible relation already contains $$6$$ pairs.
2. Symmetric: if $$(x,y)$$ is in the relation, then so is $$(y,x)$$.
The problem states that the relation must contain exactly $$10$$ ordered pairs. Since $$6$$ pairs are fixed by reflexivity, we still have to add $$10-6=4$$ more ordered pairs.
Because of symmetry, the non-diagonal pairs must be chosen in symmetric blocks: adding $$(x,y)$$ automatically forces us to add $$(y,x)$$. Consequently the extra $$4$$ pairs must come in $$\frac{4}{2}=2$$ symmetric blocks.
How many off-diagonal symmetric blocks exist? Each block corresponds to an unordered pair $$\{x,y\}$$ with $$x\neq y$$. The number of such unordered pairs in a 6-element set is $$\binom{6}{2}=15$$.
To create the relation we simply pick any $$2$$ of these $$15$$ unordered pairs; each chosen pair contributes its two ordered pairs and thus supplies the needed $$4$$ additional elements.
Hence the number of admissible relations is $$\binom{15}{2}=105$$.
Therefore, the set $$\mathcal{S}$$ contains $$\mathbf{105}$$ relations.
Let $$f : [0:3]\rightarrow A$$ be difined by $$f(x)=2x^{3}-15x^{2}+36x+7$$ and $$g: [0,\infty)\rightarrow B$$ be difined by $$g(x)=\frac{x^{2015}}{x^{2025}+1}$$. If both the functions are onto and $$S=\left\{x \in Z : x \in A or x \in B \right\}$$, then n(S) is equal to:
Set A (Range of $$f(x)$$):
$$f'(x) = 6x^2 - 30x + 36 = 6(x-2)(x-3)$$.
Critical points at $$x=2, 3$$.
$$f(0)=7, f(2)=35, f(3)=34$$. Range $$A = [7, 35]$$.
Set B (Range of $$g(x)$$):
$$g(0)=0$$. As $$x \to \infty, g(x) \to 0$$. Since $$g(x) \geq 0$$, the range starts at $$0$$. The max value (using AM-GM or derivative) is a very small decimal $$< 1$$. Thus, the only integer in $$B$$ is $$\{0\}$$.
Set S: Integers in $$A \cup B$$: $$\{0, 7, 8, \dots, 35\}$$.
Count: $$1$$ (for $$\{0\}$$) $$+ 29$$ (from $$7$$ to $$35$$) = 30
Let $$f(x)$$ be a continuously differentiable function on the interval $$(0, \infty)$$ such that $$f(1) = 2$$ and $$\lim_{t \to x} \frac{t^{10}f(x) - x^{10}f(t)}{t^9 - x^9} = 1$$ for each $$x \gt 0$$. Then, for all $$x \gt 0$$, $$f(x)$$ is equal to
The limit condition is
$$\lim_{t \to x}\;\frac{t^{10}f(x)-x^{10}f(t)}{t^{9}-x^{9}} = 1 \qquad\forall\,x\gt0$$
For fixed $$x$$, treat the numerator and denominator as functions of the variable $$t$$:
• $$g(t)=t^{10}f(x)-x^{10}f(t)$$ with $$g(x)=0$$
• $$h(t)=t^{9}-x^{9}$$ with $$h(x)=0$$
Because both approach $$0$$ as $$t\to x$$, apply L’Hospital’s Rule (differentiate with respect to $$t$$):
$$\lim_{t\to x}\frac{g(t)}{h(t)}
=\frac{g'(x)}{h'(x)}$$
Compute the derivatives:
$$g'(t)=10t^{9}f(x)-x^{10}f'(t)\;\;\Longrightarrow\;\;g'(x)=10x^{9}f(x)-x^{10}f'(x)$$
$$h'(t)=9t^{8}\;\;\Longrightarrow\;\;h'(x)=9x^{8}$$
The limit equals 1, so
$$\frac{10x^{9}f(x)-x^{10}f'(x)}{9x^{8}} = 1$$
Multiply by $$9x^{8}$$:
$$10x^{9}f(x)-x^{10}f'(x)=9x^{8}$$
Divide by $$x^{8}$$:
$$10x\,f(x)-x^{2}f'(x)=9$$
Re-arrange to a first-order linear differential equation:
$$f'(x)-\frac{10}{x}f(x)=-\frac{9}{x^{2}} \quad -(1)$$
Let integrating factor $$I(x)=e^{\int -10/x\,dx}=e^{-10\ln x}=x^{-10}$$.
Multiply $$-(1)$$ by $$x^{-10}$$:
$$x^{-10}f'(x)-\frac{10}{x}x^{-10}f(x)=-9x^{-12}$$
The left side is the derivative of $$x^{-10}f(x)$$:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\bigl(x^{-10}f(x)\bigr)=-9x^{-12}$$
Integrate:
$$x^{-10}f(x)=\int -9x^{-12}\,dx=-9\cdot\frac{x^{-11}}{-11}+C=\frac{9}{11}x^{-11}+C$$
Multiply by $$x^{10}$$ to get $$f(x)$$:
$$f(x)=x^{10}\Bigl(\frac{9}{11}x^{-11}+C\Bigr)
=\frac{9}{11x}+Cx^{10}$$
Use the given value $$f(1)=2$$:
$$2=\frac{9}{11}+C\;\;\Longrightarrow\;\;C=2-\frac{9}{11}=\frac{13}{11}$$
Hence, for all $$x\gt0$$,
$$f(x)=\frac{9}{11x}+\frac{13}{11}x^{10}$$
Option B which is: $$\frac{9}{11x} + \frac{13}{11}x^{10}$$
Let $$S = \{a + b\sqrt{2} : a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\}$$, $$T_1 = \{(-1 + \sqrt{2})^n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$$ and $$T_2 = \{(1 + \sqrt{2})^n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$$. Then which of the following statements is (are) TRUE?
The set $$S$$ consists of all numbers of the form $$a+b\sqrt{2}$$ with $$a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$$, that is $$S=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}]$$, the smallest ring containing $$\mathbb{Z}$$ and $$\sqrt{2}$$.
Option A: $$\mathbb{Z}\cup T_1\cup T_2\subset S$$
• Every integer $$m\in\mathbb{Z}$$ can be written as $$m+0\sqrt{2}\in S$$.
• For $$T_1=\{(-1+\sqrt{2})^n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$$ use the binomial theorem:
$$(-1+\sqrt{2})^n=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}(-1)^{\,n-k}(\sqrt{2})^{\,k}$$
Separate even and odd $$k$$:
$$=(-1)^n\!\!\sum_{\substack{k\text{ even}}}\binom{n}{k}2^{k/2}+(-1)^{n-1}\!\!\sum_{\substack{k\text{ odd}}}\binom{n}{k}2^{(k-1)/2}\sqrt{2}$$
The two sums are integers, so the whole expression is of the form $$a+b\sqrt{2}$$ with $$a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$$. Hence every element of $$T_1$$ lies in $$S$$.
• The same reasoning with the sign changed shows that every element of
$$T_2=\{(1+\sqrt{2})^n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$$ also belongs to $$S$$.
Therefore $$\mathbb{Z}\cup T_1\cup T_2\subset S$$ is TRUE.
Option B: $$T_1\cap\left(0,\dfrac1{2024}\right)=\varnothing$$
Put $$\alpha=\sqrt{2}-1\approx0.4142$$. Then $$(-1+\sqrt{2})^n=\alpha^{\,n}$$ because $$\alpha=(-1+\sqrt{2})$$. Since $$0\lt \alpha\lt 1$$, the sequence $$\alpha^{\,n}$$ decreases to $$0$$. Choose $$n$$ so that $$\alpha^{\,n}\lt\dfrac1{2024}$$. Solve: $$n\gt\dfrac{\ln(2024)}{-\ln\alpha}\approx\dfrac{7.61}{0.8814}\approx8.64$$ Taking $$n=9$$ gives $$\alpha^{\,9}\approx0.0032\lt\dfrac1{2024}\approx0.000494$$ false, let’s test $$n=13$$ gives $$\alpha^{\,13}\approx0.00020\lt0.000494$$. Hence an $$n$$ exists with $$\alpha^{\,n}\in\left(0,\dfrac1{2024}\right)$$, so the intersection is NOT empty. Therefore Option B is FALSE.
Option C: $$T_2\cap(2024,\infty)\neq\varnothing$$
Put $$\beta=1+\sqrt{2}\approx2.4142$$. The sequence $$\beta^{\,n}$$ is strictly increasing and unbounded. Estimate $$\beta^{\,9}=\beta^{\,8}\beta\,. $$ Now $$\beta^{\,4}\approx34.0$$, so $$\beta^{\,8}\approx34^{\,2}\approx1156$$. Then $$\beta^{\,9}\approx1156\times2.414\approx2790\gt2024$$. Thus $$\beta^{\,9}\in T_2$$ and $$\beta^{\,9}\gt2024$$, proving the intersection is non-empty. Option C is TRUE.
Option D: For $$a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$$, $$\cos\bigl(\pi(a+b\sqrt{2})\bigr)+i\sin\bigl(\pi(a+b\sqrt{2})\bigr)\in\mathbb{Z}$$ iff $$b=0$$.
Write the complex number in exponential form: $$e^{\,i\pi(a+b\sqrt{2})}=e^{\,i\pi a}\,e^{\,i\pi b\sqrt{2}}=(-1)^{a}\,e^{\,i\pi b\sqrt{2}}.$$ Its magnitude is $$1$$, so the only possible integer values are $$1$$ and $$-1$$. This requires $$e^{\,i\pi b\sqrt{2}}=\pm1\;$$, i.e. $$\pi b\sqrt{2}=k\pi$$ for some $$k\in\mathbb{Z}$$. Hence $$b\sqrt{2}=k$$. Because $$\sqrt{2}$$ is irrational, the only integer multiple of $$\sqrt{2}$$ that equals an integer is $$0$$, forcing $$b=0$$. Conversely, if $$b=0$$, the expression reduces to $$\cos(\pi a)+i\sin(\pi a)=(-1)^{a}\in\mathbb{Z}$$. Therefore the bi-implication holds and Option D is TRUE.
Correct statements: Option A, Option C, Option D.
Let $$S = x \in R : (\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^x + (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2})^x = 10$$. Then the number of elements in $$S$$ is:
We need to find the set $$S = \{x \in \mathbb{R} : (\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^x + (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2})^x = 10\}$$.
First, note that $$(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2}) = 3 - 2 = 1$$, so $$(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}}$$ and hence $$(\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2})^x = (\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^{-x}$$.
Let $$t = (\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^x$$. Since $$\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2} > 1$$, it follows that $$t > 0$$. Substituting into the given equation gives $$t + \frac{1}{t} = 10$$.
Multiplying both sides by $$t$$ yields $$t^2 + 1 = 10t$$, or $$t^2 - 10t + 1 = 0$$.
Applying the quadratic formula gives $$t = \frac{10 \pm \sqrt{100 - 4}}{2} = \frac{10 \pm \sqrt{96}}{2} = \frac{10 \pm 4\sqrt{6}}{2} = 5 \pm 2\sqrt{6}$$. Both roots are positive since $$2\sqrt{6} \approx 4.899$$, so $$t_1 = 5 + 2\sqrt{6} > 0$$ and $$t_2 = 5 - 2\sqrt{6} \approx 0.101 > 0$$.
Observe that $$5 + 2\sqrt{6} = (\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^2$$, because $$(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^2 = 3 + 2\sqrt{6} + 2 = 5 + 2\sqrt{6}$$; similarly, $$5 - 2\sqrt{6} = (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2})^2 = (\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^{-2}$$. Hence, if $$(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^x = 5 + 2\sqrt{6}$$ then $$x = 2$$, and if $$(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2})^x = 5 - 2\sqrt{6}$$ then $$x = -2$$.
Therefore, $$S = \{-2, 2\}$$, which contains 2 elements. The correct answer is 2 (Option C).
Let $$A = \{n \in [100, 700] \cap \mathbb{N} : n$$ is neither a multiple of 3 nor a multiple of 4 $$\}$$. Then the number of elements in $$A$$ is
We need to find the number of integers in $$[100, 700]$$ that are neither multiples of 3 nor multiples of 4. From 100 to 700 inclusive there are $$700 - 100 + 1 = 601$$ integers. To determine how many are multiples of 3, note that the number of multiples of 3 up to n is $$\lfloor n/3 \rfloor$$, so in this range one finds $$\lfloor 700/3 \rfloor - \lfloor 99/3 \rfloor = 233 - 33 = 200$$ multiples of 3. Similarly, the count of multiples of 4 is given by $$\lfloor 700/4 \rfloor - \lfloor 99/4 \rfloor = 175 - 24 = 151$$. Since LCM(3, 4) = 12, the integers divisible by both 3 and 4 correspond to multiples of 12, namely $$\lfloor 700/12 \rfloor - \lfloor 99/12 \rfloor = 58 - 8 = 50$$.
Applying the inclusion-exclusion principle, the total number of integers that are multiples of 3 or 4 is $$|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B| = 200 + 151 - 50 = 301$$. Therefore, the complementary set of integers that are neither multiples of 3 nor multiples of 4 has size $$601 - 301 = 300$$.
The correct answer is Option 3: 300.
Let $$A$$ and $$B$$ be two finite sets with $$m$$ and $$n$$ elements respectively. The total number of subsets of the set $$A$$ is 56 more than the total number of subsets of $$B$$. Then the distance of the point $$P(m, n)$$ from the point $$Q(-2, -3)$$ is
The number of subsets for a set with $$k$$ elements is $$2^k$$.
We are given $$2^m - 2^n = 56$$.
Factor out $$2^n$$: $$2^n(2^{m-n} - 1) = 56$$.
Prime factorize $$56 = 8 \times 7 = 2^3 \times (2^3 - 1)$$.
Comparing terms, $$n = 3$$ and $$m-n = 3 \Rightarrow m = 6$$. So, $$P$$ is $$(6, 3)$$.
Use the distance formula:
$$\text{Distance} = \sqrt{(6 - (-2))^2 + (3 - (-3))^2} = \sqrt{8^2 + 6^2} = \sqrt{100} = 10$$
Let $$A = \{2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11\}$$ and $$B = \{1, 4, 5, 10, 15\}$$. Let $$R$$ be a relation on $$A \times B$$ defined by $$(a, b)R(c, d)$$ if and only if $$3ad - 7bc$$ is an even integer. Then the relation $$R$$ is :
Relation: $$(a, b)R(c, d)$$ if $$3ad - 7bc$$ is even.
- Reflexive: $$(a, b)R(a, b) \implies 3ab - 7ba = -4ab$$, which is always even. Yes.
- Symmetric: If $$3ad - 7bc = 2k$$, then $$3cb - 7da = -(3ad - 7bc) - 4ad + 4bc = -2k - 4ad + 4bc$$, which is also even. Yes.
- Transitive: Let $(2, 1)R(6, 5)$ because $$3(2)(5) - 7(1)(6) = 30 - 42 = -12$$ (even).
Let $$(6, 5)R(3, 10)$$ because $$3(6)(10) - 7(5)(3) = 180 - 105 = 75$$ (odd).
Check a valid pair: $$(a,b)R(c,d)$$ and $$(c,d)R(e,f)$$. Due to the mix of multipliers (3 and 7), parity isn't preserved across three pairs. No.
Result: Reflexive and symmetric but not transitive. (Option B)
Let $$f(x) = \begin{cases} x-1, & x \text{ is even} \\ 2x, & x \text{ is odd} \end{cases}$$, $$x \in N$$. If for some $$a \in N$$, $$f(f(f(a))) = 21$$, then $$\lim_{x \to a^-} \left\lfloor \frac{x^3}{a} \right\rfloor - \left\lfloor \frac{x}{a} \right\rfloor$$, where $$\lfloor t \rfloor$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$t$$, is equal to:
Let $$R$$ be a relation on $$Z \times Z$$ defined by $$(a, b)R(c, d)$$ if and only if $$ad - bc$$ is divisible by $$5$$. Then $$R$$ is
The relation $$R$$ on $$\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}$$ is defined by $$(a, b)R(c, d)$$ if and only if $$ad - bc$$ is divisible by 5.
Check Reflexivity.
$$(a, b)R(a, b) \iff ab - ba = 0$$ is divisible by 5. $$\checkmark$$
$$R$$ is reflexive.
Check Symmetry.
If $$(a, b)R(c, d)$$, then $$5 \mid (ad - bc)$$.
We need to check: is $$5 \mid (cb - da)$$?
$$cb - da = -(ad - bc)$$. Since $$5 \mid (ad - bc)$$, we have $$5 \mid (-(ad-bc)) = cb - da$$. $$\checkmark$$
$$R$$ is symmetric.
Check Transitivity.
We need: if $$(a,b)R(c,d)$$ and $$(c,d)R(e,f)$$, then $$(a,b)R(e,f)$$.
Given: $$5 \mid (ad - bc)$$ and $$5 \mid (cf - de)$$.
Need to show: $$5 \mid (af - be)$$.
Counterexample:
Take $$(a, b) = (1, 1)$$, $$(c, d) = (5, 5)$$, $$(e, f) = (1, 2)$$.
Check $$(1,1)R(5,5)$$: $$ad - bc = 1 \cdot 5 - 1 \cdot 5 = 0$$. Divisible by 5. $$\checkmark$$
Check $$(5,5)R(1,2)$$: $$cf - de = 5 \cdot 2 - 5 \cdot 1 = 5$$. Divisible by 5. $$\checkmark$$
Check $$(1,1)R(1,2)$$: $$af - be = 1 \cdot 2 - 1 \cdot 1 = 1$$. NOT divisible by 5. $$\times$$
So transitivity fails.
$$R$$ is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
The correct answer is Option (1): $$\boxed{\text{Reflexive and symmetric but not transitive}}$$.
If $$R$$ is the smallest equivalence relation on the set $$\{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ such that $$\{(1, 2), (1, 3)\} \subset R$$, then the number of elements in $$R$$ is ______.
We need to find the number of elements in the smallest equivalence relation $$R$$ on $$\{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ such that $$\{(1,2), (1,3)\} \subset R$$.
An equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Given: $$(1,2)$$ and $$(1,3)$$ must be in $$R$$.
Reflexive property requires: $$(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4)$$ must all be in $$R$$.
Since $$(1,2) \in R$$, we need $$(2,1) \in R$$.
Since $$(1,3) \in R$$, we need $$(3,1) \in R$$.
Since $$(2,1) \in R$$ and $$(1,3) \in R$$, we need $$(2,3) \in R$$.
By symmetry of $$(2,3)$$: $$(3,2) \in R$$.
Check: $$(3,1) \in R$$ and $$(1,2) \in R$$ gives $$(3,2) \in R$$ — already included.
The elements 1, 2, 3 are all equivalent to each other, and 4 is only equivalent to itself.
$$R = \{(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (1,2), (2,1), (1,3), (3,1), (2,3), (3,2)\}$$
$$|R| = 10$$
The correct answer is Option 1 — $$10$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$$. Let $$R$$ be a relation on $$A$$ defined by $$xRy$$ if and only if $$4x \leq 5y$$. Let $$m$$ be the number of elements in $$R$$ and $$n$$ be the minimum number of elements from $$A \times A$$ that are required to be added to $$R$$ to make it a symmetric relation. Then $$m + n$$ is equal to :
The relation $$R$$ on $$A = \{1,2,3,4,5\}$$ is defined by $$xRy$$ iff $$4x \leq 5y$$, i.e., $$y \geq 4x/5$$.
Count elements m: For $$x=1$$: $$y \geq 0.8$$, so $$y \in \{1,2,3,4,5\}$$ (5 pairs). $$x=2$$: $$y \geq 1.6$$ (4). $$x=3$$: $$y \geq 2.4$$ (3). $$x=4$$: $$y \geq 3.2$$ (2). $$x=5$$: $$y \geq 4$$ (2). Total $$m = 16$$.
All 5 diagonal elements $$(i,i)$$ are in $$R$$. Off-diagonal pairs in R: 11.
Check symmetry: For each off-diagonal $$(x,y) \in R$$, check if $$(y,x) \in R$$. The only symmetric off-diagonal pair is $$\{4,5\}$$ (both $$(4,5)$$ and $$(5,4)$$ are in $$R$$). The remaining 9 off-diagonal pairs lack their reverse.
So $$n = 9$$ elements must be added.
$$m + n = 16 + 9 = 25$$.
The correct answer is Option 1: $$25$$.
Let $$[t]$$ be the greatest integer less than or equal to $$t$$. Let $$A$$ be the set of all prime factors of 2310 and $$f : A \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$$ be the function $$f(x) = \left[\log_2\left(x^2 + \left[\frac{x^3}{5}\right]\right)\right]$$. The number of one-to-one functions from $$A$$ to the range of $$f$$ is
2310 = 2×3×5×7×11. A = {2,3,5,7,11} (5 elements). f(2)=[log₂(4+1)]=[2.32]=2. f(3)=[log₂(9+5)]=[3.81]=3. f(5)=[log₂(25+25)]=[5.64]=5. f(7)=[log₂(49+68)]=[log₂117]=[6.87]=6. f(11)=[log₂(121+266)]=[log₂387]=[8.59]=8. Range={2,3,5,6,8}: 5 elements. One-to-one from 5 to 5: 5!=120.
Option (4): 120.
Consider the relations $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ defined as $$aR_1b \Leftrightarrow a^2 + b^2 = 1$$ for all $$a, b \in R$$ and $$(a,b)R_2(c,d) \Leftrightarrow a + d = b + c$$ for all $$(a,b,c,d) \in N \times N$$. Then
Determine which of $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ is an equivalence relation.
An equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Checking $$R_1$$: $$aR_1b \Leftrightarrow a^2 + b^2 = 1$$ for $$a, b \in \mathbb{R}$$.
Reflexive? We need $$aR_1a$$, i.e., $$a^2 + a^2 = 1 \Rightarrow 2a^2 = 1 \Rightarrow a = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$. This fails for other values of $$a$$ (e.g., $$0^2 + 0^2 = 0 \neq 1$$). Not reflexive.
Since $$R_1$$ is not reflexive, it is NOT an equivalence relation.
Checking $$R_2$$: $$(a,b)R_2(c,d) \Leftrightarrow a + d = b + c$$ for $$(a,b),(c,d) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$$.
Reflexive? $$(a,b)R_2(a,b) \Leftrightarrow a + b = b + a$$. True always. Reflexive.
Symmetric? If $$(a,b)R_2(c,d)$$, then $$a+d = b+c$$, which means $$c+b = d+a$$, so $$(c,d)R_2(a,b)$$. Symmetric.
Transitive? If $$(a,b)R_2(c,d)$$ and $$(c,d)R_2(e,f)$$, then $$a+d = b+c$$ and $$c+f = d+e$$. Adding: $$a+d+c+f = b+c+d+e$$, which simplifies to $$a+f = b+e$$, so $$(a,b)R_2(e,f)$$. Transitive.
$$R_2$$ is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, so it IS an equivalence relation.
The correct answer is Option B: Only $$R_2$$ is an equivalence relation.
Let $$A = \{1, 3, 7, 9, 11\}$$ and $$B = \{2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12\}$$. Then the total number of one-one maps $$f : A \to B$$, such that $$f(1) + f(3) = 14$$, is :
Let the sets be $$A = \{1, 3, 7, 9, 11\}$$ and $$B = \{2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12\}$$.
We seek one-one maps $$f: A \to B$$ such that $$f(1) + f(3) = 14$$.
Considering ordered pairs from B that sum to 14, we have $$(2,12), (4,10), (7,7)$$, but $$(7,7)$$ is not allowed under a one-one mapping, so the valid pairs are $$(2,12)$$ and $$(4,10)$$.
Each of these pairs yields two assignments for $$f(1)$$ and $$f(3)$$, namely for $$(2,12)$$ the options $$f(1)=2, f(3)=12$$ or $$f(1)=12, f(3)=2$$, and for $$(4,10)$$ the options $$f(1)=4, f(3)=10$$ or $$f(1)=10, f(3)=4$$, giving 4 total assignments.
Since pairs like $$(5,9)$$ and $$(6,8)$$ are invalid because 9 and 6 are not in B, there are no further assignments for $$f(1)$$ and $$f(3)$$ beyond these four.
For each of these assignments, the remaining three elements $$\{7,9,11\}$$ of A must be mapped one-to-one to any three of the remaining five elements of B. The number of such mappings is $$P(5,3) = 5 \times 4 \times 3 = 60$$.
Therefore, the total number of one-one maps satisfying the condition is $$4 \times 60 = 240$$.
The correct answer is Option (2): 240.
Let a relation $$R$$ on $$\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$$ be defined as: $$(x_1, y_1) R (x_2, y_2)$$ if and only if $$x_1 \leq x_2$$ or $$y_1 \leq y_2$$. Consider the two statements: (I) $$R$$ is reflexive but not symmetric. (II) $$R$$ is transitive. Then which one of the following is true?
We have a relation $$R$$ on $$\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$$ defined as: $$(x_1, y_1)\,R\,(x_2, y_2)$$ if and only if $$x_1 \leq x_2$$ or $$y_1 \leq y_2$$.
For any $$(a, b) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}$$, we need $$(a, b)\,R\,(a, b)$$, that is $$a \leq a$$ or $$b \leq b$$. Since $$a \leq a$$ is always true, $$R$$ is reflexive. ✓
To check symmetry, consider $$(1, 1)$$ and $$(2, 2)$$. We have $$(1, 1)\,R\,(2, 2)$$ because $$1 \leq 2$$, but $$(2, 2)\,R\,(1, 1)$$ fails since neither $$2 \leq 1$$ nor $$2 \leq 1$$ holds. Thus $$R$$ is not symmetric, so Statement (I) — “$$R$$ is reflexive but not symmetric” — is TRUE.
To test transitivity, assume $$(x_1, y_1)\,R\,(x_2, y_2)$$ and $$(x_2, y_2)\,R\,(x_3, y_3)$$ and check whether $$(x_1, y_1)\,R\,(x_3, y_3)$$ always holds. As a counterexample, take $$(5, 2)$$, $$(1, 5)$$, and $$(4, 1)$$. First, $$(5, 2)\,R\,(1, 5)$$ holds because $$5 \leq 1$$ is false but $$2 \leq 5$$ is true. Next, $$(1, 5)\,R\,(4, 1)$$ holds since $$1 \leq 4$$. However, $$(5, 2)\,R\,(4, 1)$$ fails because both $$5 \leq 4$$ and $$2 \leq 1$$ are false. Consequently, $$R$$ is not transitive, and Statement (II) — “$$R$$ is transitive” — is FALSE.
Therefore, only Statement (I) is correct, and the answer is Option D: Only (I) is correct.
Let the relations $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ on the set $$X = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 20\}$$ be given by $$R_1 = \{(x, y) : 2x - 3y = 2\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(x, y) : -5x + 4y = 0\}$$. If $$M$$ and $$N$$ be the minimum number of elements required to be added in $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$, respectively, in order to make the relations symmetric, then $$M + N$$ equals
We need to find M + N where M and N are the minimum elements to add to make $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ symmetric.
To find the elements of $$R_1$$, note that $$R_1 = \{(x,y) : 2x - 3y = 2\}$$ where $$x, y \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 20\}$$. Solving: $$x = \frac{3y + 2}{2}$$. For $$x$$ to be a positive integer, $$3y + 2$$ must be even, so $$y$$ must be even.
Checking even values of $$y$$: $$y = 2$$: $$x = 4$$ ✓ | $$y = 4$$: $$x = 7$$ ✓ | $$y = 6$$: $$x = 10$$ ✓ | $$y = 8$$: $$x = 13$$ ✓ | $$y = 10$$: $$x = 16$$ ✓ | $$y = 12$$: $$x = 19$$ ✓ | $$y = 14$$: $$x = 22 > 20$$ ✗.
Thus $$R_1 = \{(4,2), (7,4), (10,6), (13,8), (16,10), (19,12)\}$$ — 6 pairs.
For symmetry in $$R_1$$, if $$(a,b) \in R_1$$ then $$(b,a)$$ must also be in $$R_1$$. None of the reverse pairs $$(2,4), (4,7), (6,10), (8,13), (10,16), (12,19)$$ are in $$R_1$$, so all 6 reverse pairs must be added.
M = 6
Next, to find the elements of $$R_2$$, observe that $$R_2 = \{(x,y) : -5x + 4y = 0\}$$, i.e., $$y = \frac{5x}{4}$$. For $$y$$ to be a positive integer, $$x$$ must be a multiple of 4.
Checking: $$x = 4$$: $$y = 5$$ ✓ | $$x = 8$$: $$y = 10$$ ✓ | $$x = 12$$: $$y = 15$$ ✓ | $$x = 16$$: $$y = 20$$ ✓ | $$x = 20$$: $$y = 25 > 20$$ ✗.
Hence $$R_2 = \{(4,5), (8,10), (12,15), (16,20)\}$$ — 4 pairs.
For symmetry in $$R_2$$, the reverse pairs $$(5,4), (10,8), (15,12), (20,16)$$ are not present, so all 4 must be added.
N = 4
Finally, $$M + N = 6 + 4 = 10$$. The correct answer is Option 4: 10.
If $$f(x) = \begin{cases} 2 + 2x, & -1 \leq x < 0 \\ 1 - \frac{x}{3}, & 0 \leq x \leq 3 \end{cases}$$; $$g(x) = \begin{cases} -x, & -3 \leq x \leq 0 \\ x, & 0 < x \leq 1 \end{cases}$$, then range of $$(f \circ g(x))$$ is
We need to find the range of the composite function $$f \circ g(x) = f(g(x))$$.
Determine the domain and range of $$g(x)$$.
$$g(x) = \begin{cases} -x, & -3 \leq x \leq 0 \\ x, & 0 < x \leq 1 \end{cases}$$
For $$x \in [-3, 0]$$: $$g(x) = -x \in [0, 3]$$
For $$x \in (0, 1]$$: $$g(x) = x \in (0, 1]$$
So the range of $$g$$ is $$[0, 3]$$.
Evaluate $$f(g(x))$$ where $$g(x) \in [0, 3]$$.
Since $$g(x) \in [0, 3]$$, we use the second piece of $$f$$:
$$f(t) = 1 - \frac{t}{3}$$ for $$0 \leq t \leq 3$$
When $$t = 0$$: $$f(0) = 1$$
When $$t = 3$$: $$f(3) = 1 - 1 = 0$$
Since $$f(t) = 1 - t/3$$ is continuous and decreasing on $$[0, 3]$$, its range on this interval is $$[0, 1]$$.
Verify that all values in $$[0, 1]$$ are achieved.
For any $$y \in [0, 1]$$, we need $$t = 3(1-y) \in [0, 3]$$, and we need some $$x$$ in the domain of $$g$$ such that $$g(x) = t$$.
Since $$g$$ maps $$[-3, 0]$$ onto $$[0, 3]$$ (via $$g(x) = -x$$), every value $$t \in [0, 3]$$ is achieved.
Therefore, $$f(g(x))$$ achieves all values in $$[0, 1]$$, including both endpoints.
The range of $$f \circ g(x)$$ is $$[0, 1]$$.
The correct answer is Option (3): $$[0, 1]$$.
If the domain of the function $$\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{3x-22}{2x-19}\right) + \log_e\left(\frac{3x^2-8x+5}{x^2-3x-10}\right)$$ is $$(\alpha, \beta]$$, then $$3\alpha + 10\beta$$ is equal to:
For $$\sin^{-1}(u)$$: $$-1 \le \frac{3x-22}{2x-19} \le 1$$.
o Case 1: $$\frac{3x-22}{2x-19} + 1 \ge 0 \implies \frac{5x-41}{2x-19} \ge 0 \implies x \in (-\infty, 8.2] \cup (9.5, \infty)$$.
o Case 2: $$\frac{3x-22}{2x-19} - 1 \le 0 \implies \frac{x-3}{2x-19} \le 0 \implies x \in [3, 9.5)$$.
Intersection: $$x \in [3, 8.2]$$.
For $$\log(v)$$: $$\frac{(3x-5)(x-1)}{(x-5)(x+2)} > 0$$.
Critical points: $$-2, 1, 5/3, 5$$.
Intervals: $$(-\infty, -2) \cup (1, 5/3) \cup (5, \infty)$$.
Common Domain: Intersect $$[3, 8.2]$$ with the log domain $$\implies x \in (5, 8.2]$$.
$$\alpha = 5, \beta = 8.2 = \frac{41}{5}$$.
Calculate: $$3\alpha + 10\beta = 3(5) + 10(\frac{41}{5}) = 15 + 82 = 97$$.
Let $$f: \mathbb{R} - \frac{-1}{2}\to \mathbb{R}$$ and $$g: \mathbb{R} - \frac{-5}{2} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined as $$f(x) = \frac{2x + 3}{2x + 1}$$ and $$g(x) = \frac{|x| + 1}{2x + 5}$$. Then the domain of the function fog is:
The composite function $$f\circ g$$ is defined at a real number $$x$$ when both of the following conditions are satisfied:
• $$g(x)$$ is defined (so $$x$$ lies in the domain of $$g$$).
• $$g(x)$$ lies in the domain of $$f$$ (so $$g(x)\neq -\tfrac12$$, because $$f$$ is not defined at $$x=-\tfrac12$$).
Step 1: Write the individual domains.
• For $$f(x)=\dfrac{2x+3}{2x+1}$$ the denominator must be non-zero, so $$2x+1\neq 0\; \Rightarrow\; x\neq -\tfrac12$$; hence
Domain$$(f)=\mathbb{R}-\left\{-\tfrac12\right\}$$.
• For $$g(x)=\dfrac{|x|+1}{2x+5}$$ the denominator must be non-zero, so $$2x+5\neq 0\; \Rightarrow\; x\neq -\tfrac52$$; hence
Domain$$(g)=\mathbb{R}-\left\{-\tfrac52\right\}$$.
Step 2: Find the values of $$x$$ (if any) for which $$g(x)=-\tfrac12$$, because those would be excluded from the domain of $$f\circ g$$.
Case 1: $$x\ge 0\Rightarrow |x|=x$$.
Equation: $$\frac{x+1}{2x+5}=-\frac12$$.
Cross-multiplying: $$2(x+1)=-(2x+5)\;\Rightarrow\;2x+2=-2x-5\;\Rightarrow\;4x+7=0$$.
This gives $$x=-\tfrac74$$, which is negative, contradicting $$x\ge 0$$. Hence no solution in this case.
Case 2: $$x\lt 0\Rightarrow |x|=-x$$.
Equation: $$\frac{-x+1}{2x+5}=-\frac12$$.
Cross-multiplying: $$2(-x+1)=-(2x+5)\;\Rightarrow\;-2x+2=-2x-5$$.
Adding $$2x$$ to both sides gives $$2=-5$$, which is impossible. Hence no solution in this case either.
Thus $$g(x)$$ never equals $$-\tfrac12$$ for any real $$x$$.
Step 3: Collect the restrictions.
• The only restriction from $$g$$ is $$x\neq -\tfrac52$$.
• There is no additional restriction from $$f$$ because $$g(x)\neq -\tfrac12$$ for every real $$x$$.
Therefore the domain of the composite function $$f\circ g$$ is
$$\mathbb{R}-\left\{-\tfrac52\right\}$$.
Hence the correct option is Option A.
Let $$f(x) = \begin{cases} -a & \text{if } -a \leq x \leq 0 \\ x + a & \text{if } 0 < x \leq a \end{cases}$$ where $$a > 0$$ and $$g(x) = (f(x|) - |f(x)|)/2$$. Then the function $$g : [-a, a] \rightarrow [-a, a]$$ is :
$$(g(x)=\frac{f(x)-|f(x)|}{2})$$
$$If(f(x)<0\Rightarrow g(x)=f(x)=-a)$$
$$If(f(x)>0\Rightarrow g(x)=0)$$
So range = ({-a, 0})
→ Not one-one, not onto
Neither one-one nor onto
Let $$S = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 10\}$$. Suppose $$M$$ is the set of all the subsets of $$S$$, then the relation $$R = \{(A, B) : A \cap B \neq \phi; \; A, B \in M\}$$ is :
$$M$$ is the power set of $$S = \{1, 2, ..., 10\}$$. The relation $$R = \{(A, B) : A \cap B \neq \phi\}$$.
Reflexive? Is $$(A, A) \in R$$ for all $$A \in M$$? We need $$A \cap A \neq \phi$$, i.e., $$A \neq \phi$$. But $$\phi \in M$$ and $$\phi \cap \phi = \phi$$. So $$(\phi, \phi) \notin R$$. Not reflexive.
Symmetric? If $$A \cap B \neq \phi$$, then $$B \cap A \neq \phi$$. Yes, symmetric.
Transitive? Consider $$A = \{1\}$$, $$B = \{1, 2\}$$, $$C = \{2\}$$. Then $$A \cap B = \{1\} \neq \phi$$ and $$B \cap C = \{2\} \neq \phi$$, but $$A \cap C = \phi$$. Not transitive.
The relation is symmetric only. The answer corresponds to Option (4).
If $$f(x) = \frac{4x+3}{6x-4}, x \neq \frac{2}{3}$$ and $$(f \circ f)(x) = g(x)$$, where $$g: \mathbb{R} - \left\{\frac{2}{3}\right\} \to \mathbb{R} - \left\{\frac{2}{3}\right\}$$, then $$(g \circ g \circ g)(4)$$ is equal to
We need to find $$(g \circ g \circ g)(4)$$ where $$g(x) = (f \circ f)(x)$$ and $$f(x) = \frac{4x+3}{6x-4}$$. First, compute $$f(f(x))$$:
$$f(f(x)) = f\left(\frac{4x+3}{6x-4}\right) = \frac{4 \cdot \frac{4x+3}{6x-4} + 3}{6 \cdot \frac{4x+3}{6x-4} - 4}$$
Simplify the numerator: $$\frac{4(4x+3) + 3(6x-4)}{6x-4} = \frac{16x+12+18x-12}{6x-4} = \frac{34x}{6x-4}$$ and simplify the denominator: $$\frac{6(4x+3) - 4(6x-4)}{6x-4} = \frac{24x+18-24x+16}{6x-4} = \frac{34}{6x-4}$$
Therefore, $$f(f(x)) = \frac{34x/(6x-4)}{34/(6x-4)} = \frac{34x}{34} = x$$ which means that $$g(x) = f(f(x))$$ is the identity function.
Since $$g$$ is the identity function, $$(g \circ g \circ g)(4) = g(g(g(4))) = g(g(4)) = g(4) = 4.$$
The correct answer is Option 4: 4.
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{x^2 - 25}}{4 - x^2} + \log_{10}(x^2 + 2x - 15)$$ is $$(-\infty, \alpha) \cup [\beta, \infty)$$, then $$\alpha^2 + \beta^3$$ is equal to:
Find $$\alpha^2 + \beta^3$$ for the domain $$(-\infty, \alpha) \cup [\beta, \infty)$$ of $$f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{x^2-25}}{4-x^2} + \log_{10}(x^2+2x-15)$$.
Requires $$x^2 - 25 \geq 0$$, i.e., $$x^2 \geq 25$$.
$$x \leq -5$$ or $$x \geq 5$$.
$$x^2 \neq 4$$, so $$x \neq \pm 2$$.
Combined with Step 1 ($$|x| \geq 5$$), the condition $$x \neq \pm 2$$ is automatically satisfied.
Requires $$x^2 + 2x - 15 > 0$$ (strictly positive for log).
Factoring: $$(x+5)(x-3) > 0$$.
By interval testing: positive when $$x < -5$$ or $$x > 3$$.
From Step 1: $$x \leq -5$$ or $$x \geq 5$$.
From Step 3: $$x < -5$$ or $$x > 3$$.
Intersection: $$(x \leq -5) \cap (x < -5) = x < -5$$, and $$(x \geq 5) \cap (x > 3) = x \geq 5$$.
Wait: at $$x = -5$$: $$x^2 + 2x - 15 = 25 - 10 - 15 = 0$$, and $$\log(0)$$ is undefined. So $$x = -5$$ is excluded.
Domain: $$(-\infty, -5) \cup [5, \infty)$$.
Comparing with $$(-\infty, \alpha) \cup [\beta, \infty)$$: $$\alpha = -5$$ and $$\beta = 5$$.
$$\alpha^2 + \beta^3 = (-5)^2 + 5^3 = 25 + 125 = 150$$.
The correct answer is Option C: 150.
Let $$f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ and $$g: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined as $$f(x) = \begin{cases} \log_e x, & x \gt 0 \\ e^{-x}, & x \leq 0 \end{cases}$$ and $$g(x) = \begin{cases} x, & x \geq 0 \\ e^x, & x \lt 0 \end{cases}$$. Then, $$g \circ f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ is:
$$h(x) = g(f(x))$$.
If $$x > 0$$, $$f(x) = \log_e x$$.
If $$\log_e x \ge 0$$ (i.e., $$x \ge 1$$), $$h(x) = \log_e x$$.
If $$\log_e x < 0$$ (i.e., $$0 < x < 1$$), $$h(x) = e^{\log_e x} = x$$.
If $$x \le 0$$, $$f(x) = e^{-x} \ge 1$$.
Since $$f(x) \ge 1$$, $$h(x) = e^{-x}$$ (using the $$x \ge 0$$ case of $$g(x)$$).
The function values are always $$>0$$. Therefore, it can never reach negative values in the codomain $$\mathbb{R}$$. It is not onto.
Check values: $$h(1/2) = 1/2$$. Also, $$h(x) = e^{-x}$$ for $$x \le 0$$ covers $$[1, \infty)$$. The function is not monotonic and repeats values.
Result: B (neither one-one nor onto).
Let the sum of the maximum and the minimum values of the function $$f(x) = \frac{2x^2-3x+8}{2x^2+3x+8}$$ be $$\frac{m}{n}$$, where gcd(m, n) = 1. Then m + n is equal to:
Let the range of $$f(x)=\dfrac{2x^{2}-3x+8}{2x^{2}+3x+8}$$ be $$\left[f_{\min},\,f_{\max}\right]$$. To find $$f_{\min}$$ and $$f_{\max}$$, set $$f(x)=y$$ and eliminate $$x$$.
$$y=\dfrac{2x^{2}-3x+8}{2x^{2}+3x+8}$$ Cross-multiplying gives $$y\bigl(2x^{2}+3x+8\bigr)=2x^{2}-3x+8$$ $$\Longrightarrow(2-2y)x^{2}+(-3-3y)x+(8-8y)=0$$
Factor the common terms: $$2(1-y)x^{2}-3(1+y)x+8(1-y)=0 \;-(1)$$ Equation $$(1)$$ is quadratic in $$x$$. For real $$x$$, its discriminant must satisfy $$\Delta\ge 0$$.
Coefficients of $$(1)$$ are $$A=2(1-y),\;B=-3(1+y),\;C=8(1-y)$$. Hence $$\Delta=B^{2}-4AC$$ $$\Delta=\bigl[-3(1+y)\bigr]^{2}-4\cdot2(1-y)\cdot8(1-y)$$ $$\Delta=9(1+y)^{2}-64(1-y)^{2}$$
Expand both squares: $$(1+y)^{2}=1+2y+y^{2},\qquad(1-y)^{2}=1-2y+y^{2}$$ $$\therefore\;\Delta=9(1+2y+y^{2})-64(1-2y+y^{2})$$ $$\Delta=9+18y+9y^{2}-64+128y-64y^{2}$$ $$\Delta=-55y^{2}+146y-55$$
For real $$x$$, $$\Delta\ge 0$$, so $$-55y^{2}+146y-55\;\ge\;0$$ Multiply by $$-1$$ (reversing the inequality): $$55y^{2}-146y+55\;\le\;0 \;-(2)$$
Quadratic $$(2)$$ in $$y$$ has roots $$y=\dfrac{146\pm\sqrt{146^{2}-4\cdot55\cdot55}}{2\cdot55}$$ Compute the discriminant: $$146^{2}-4\cdot55\cdot55=21316-12100=9216=96^{2}$$ Thus the roots are $$y_{1}=\dfrac{146-96}{110}=\dfrac{50}{110}=\dfrac{5}{11},\qquad y_{2}=\dfrac{146+96}{110}=\dfrac{242}{110}=\dfrac{11}{5}$$
Because the coefficient $$55$$ in $$(2)$$ is positive, inequality $$(2)$$ holds for $$y$$ lying between the roots. Therefore $$\boxed{\dfrac{5}{11}\;\le\;y\;\le\;\dfrac{11}{5}}$$ Hence $$f_{\min}=\dfrac{5}{11},\qquad f_{\max}=\dfrac{11}{5}$$
The required sum is $$f_{\min}+f_{\max}=\dfrac{5}{11}+\dfrac{11}{5}$$ Take the common denominator $$55$$: $$=\dfrac{25}{55}+\dfrac{121}{55}=\dfrac{146}{55}$$
Here $$m=146,\;n=55$$ with $$\gcd(m,n)=1$$, so $$m+n=146+55=201$$.
The correct option is Option B (201).
The function $$f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$, $$f(x) = \frac{x^2 + 2x - 15}{x^2 - 4x + 9}$$, $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$ is
$$f(x) = \frac{x^2+2x-15}{x^2-4x+9}$$. Denominator: discriminant = 16-36 = -20 < 0, always positive.
Check one-one: f(3) = (9+6-15)/(9-12+9) = 0/6 = 0. f(-5) = (25-10-15)/(25+20+9) = 0/54 = 0. Not one-one.
Check onto: Let y = f(x). Then x²+2x-15 = y(x²-4x+9). (1-y)x² + (2+4y)x - (15+9y) = 0.
For real x: D ≥ 0. (2+4y)² + 4(1-y)(15+9y) ≥ 0.
4+16y+16y² + 4(15+9y-15y-9y²) ≥ 0. 4+16y+16y²+60-24y-36y² ≥ 0. -20y²-8y+64 ≥ 0. 20y²+8y-64 ≤ 0.
5y²+2y-16 ≤ 0. Roots: y = (-2±√(4+320))/10 = (-2±18)/10. y ∈ [-2, 8/5].
Range is [-2, 8/5] ≠ ℝ. Not onto.
The correct answer is Option (4): neither one-one nor onto.
If $$f(x) = \begin{cases} x^3 \sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right), & x \neq 0 \\ 0, & x = 0 \end{cases}$$ then
We must find the second derivative of the function $$f(x)=\begin{cases}x^{3}\sin\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right), & x\neq 0\\[4pt]0,&x=0\end{cases}$$ at two points: $$x=\dfrac{2}{\pi}$$ and $$x=0$$, and then match with the given options.
Case 1: Evaluation of $$f''\!\left(\dfrac{2}{\pi}\right)$$ (point away from zero, so usual differentiation rules apply).
Write $$f(x)=x^{3}\sin\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right)$$ for $$x\neq 0$$.
First derivative (product rule):
$$f'(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\!\bigl[x^{3}\bigr]\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)+x^{3}\,\frac{d}{dx}\!\left[\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right]$$
Using $$\dfrac{d}{dx}\!\bigl[x^{3}\bigr]=3x^{2}$$ and $$\dfrac{d}{dx}\!\left[\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right]=\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\!\left(-\frac{1}{x^{2}}\right)$$, we get
$$f'(x)=3x^{2}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right).$$
Second derivative:
Differentiate each term separately.
• For $$3x^{2}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$$:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\Bigl[3x^{2}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\Bigr]=6x\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)+3x^{2}\!\left[\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\!\left(-\frac{1}{x^{2}}\right)\right]$$
$$=6x\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-3\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right).$$
• For $$-x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$$:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\Bigl[-x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\Bigr]=-\,\Bigl[\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)+x\!\left(\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\frac{1}{x^{2}}\right)\Bigr]$$
$$= -\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{x}.$$
Combine the two results to get
$$f''(x)=\bigl[6x\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-3\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\bigr]-\Bigl[\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)+\frac{\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{x}\Bigr]$$
$$=6x\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-\frac{\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{x}-4\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right).$$
Factor the sine term:
$$f''(x)=\left(\frac{6x^{2}-1}{x}\right)\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)-4\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right).$$
Now put $$x=\dfrac{2}{\pi}$$:
• $$\dfrac{1}{x}=\dfrac{\pi}{2}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \sin\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)=\sin\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=1,$$
$$\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=0.$$
• $$x^{2}=\dfrac{4}{\pi^{2}}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad 6x^{2}-1=\frac{24}{\pi^{2}}-1.$$
• Evaluate the prefactor:
$$\frac{6x^{2}-1}{x}=\frac{\dfrac{24}{\pi^{2}}-1}{\dfrac{2}{\pi}}=\left(\frac{24}{\pi^{2}}-1\right)\!\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\frac{24}{2\pi}-\frac{\pi}{2}=\frac{12}{\pi}-\frac{\pi}{2}=\frac{24-\pi^{2}}{2\pi}.$$
Hence
$$f''\!\left(\frac{2}{\pi}\right)=\left(\frac{24-\pi^{2}}{2\pi}\right)\cdot 1-4\cdot 0=\frac{24-\pi^{2}}{2\pi}.$$
This matches Option A.
Case 2: Does $$f''(0)$$ exist?
First, find $$f'(0)$$ by definition:
$$f'(0)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h^{3}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right)}{h}= \lim_{h\to 0}h^{2}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right)=0,$$
because $$|h^{2}\sin(1/h)|\le h^{2}\to 0.$$
For the second derivative, use
$$f''(0)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f'(h)-f'(0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f'(h)}{h}.$$
Recall $$f'(h)=3h^{2}\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right)-h\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right).$$ Hence
$$\frac{f'(h)}{h}=3h\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right)-\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right).$$
As $$h\to 0$$, the term $$3h\sin\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right)\to 0,$$ but $$\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{h}\right)$$ oscillates between $$-1$$ and $$1$$ without settling at a single value. Therefore the limit does not exist, so $$f''(0)$$ is undefined.
Thus both statements “$$f''(0)=1$$” and “$$f''(0)=0$$” are false.
Only Option A is correct.
If the function $$f: (-\infty, -1] \rightarrow [a, b]$$ defined by $$f(x) = e^{x^3 - 3x + 1}$$ is one-one and onto, then the distance of the point $$P(2b + 4, a + 2)$$ from the line $$x + e^{-3}y = 4$$ is:
We are given $$f(x) = e^{x^3 - 3x + 1}$$ defined on $$(-\infty, -1]$$ mapping onto $$[a, b]$$ as a one-one and onto function. We need to find the distance of point $$P(2b+4, a+2)$$ from the line $$x + e^{-3}y = 4$$.
Let $$g(x) = x^3 - 3x + 1$$, so $$f(x) = e^{g(x)}$$. Then $$g'(x) = 3x^2 - 3 = 3(x-1)(x+1).$$ On $$(-\infty, -1)$$ we have $$g'(x) > 0$$ (both factors have the same sign), so $$g$$ is strictly increasing. At $$x = -1$$, $$g(-1) = -1 + 3 + 1 = 3$$, giving a local maximum of $$g$$. As $$x \to -\infty$$, $$g(x) \to -\infty$$. Thus on $$(-\infty, -1]$$, $$g$$ increases from $$-\infty$$ to $$3$$, and consequently $$f(x) = e^{g(x)}$$ increases from $$0$$ to $$e^3$$. Therefore the range of $$f$$ on this domain is $$(0, e^3]$$, which implies $$a = 0$$ and $$b = e^3$$.
Substituting these values into the coordinates of $$P$$ gives $$P(2b + 4, a + 2) = P(2e^3 + 4, 2).$$
The line $$x + e^{-3}y = 4$$ can be rewritten as $$x + e^{-3}y - 4 = 0$$. The distance from a point $$(x_0, y_0)$$ to this line is given by $$\frac{|x_0 + e^{-3}y_0 - 4|}{\sqrt{1 + e^{-6}}}.$$ Substituting $$x_0 = 2e^3 + 4$$ and $$y_0 = 2$$ yields $$\frac{|2e^3 + 4 + 2e^{-3} - 4|}{\sqrt{1 + e^{-6}}} = \frac{|2e^3 + 2e^{-3}|}{\sqrt{1 + e^{-6}}} = \frac{2(e^3 + e^{-3})}{\sqrt{1 + e^{-6}}} = \frac{2e^{-3}(e^6 + 1)}{e^{-3}\sqrt{e^6 + 1}} = \frac{2(e^6+1)}{\sqrt{e^6+1}} = 2\sqrt{e^6 + 1} = 2\sqrt{1 + e^6}.$$
Option 1: $$2\sqrt{1 + e^6}$$
The function $$f : \mathbb{N} - \{1\} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$$; defined by $$f(n) =$$ the highest prime factor of $$n$$, is :
$$f : \mathbb{N} - \{1\} \to \mathbb{N}$$ where $$f(n)$$ = highest prime factor of $$n$$.
One-one? No. $$f(4) = 2$$ and $$f(8) = 2$$. Different inputs give the same output.
Onto? We need every natural number to be a highest prime factor of some $$n$$. But $$f(n)$$ is always a prime number, so $$1, 4, 6, 8, ...$$ (non-primes) are never in the range. So not onto.
The function is neither one-one nor onto. The answer corresponds to Option (4).
For the function $$f(x) = \sin x + 3x - \frac{2}{\pi}(x^2 + x)$$, where $$x \in [0, \frac{\pi}{2}]$$, consider the following two statements : (I) $$f$$ is increasing in $$(0, \frac{\pi}{2})$$. (II) $$f'$$ is decreasing in $$(0, \frac{\pi}{2})$$. Between the above two statements,
$$f(x) = \sin x + 3x - \frac{2}{\pi}(x^2 + x)$$ on $$[0, \pi/2]$$.
Statement (I): f is increasing in $$(0, \pi/2)$$.
$$ f'(x) = \cos x + 3 - \frac{2}{\pi}(2x + 1) = \cos x + 3 - \frac{4x}{\pi} - \frac{2}{\pi} $$At $$x = 0$$: $$f'(0) = 1 + 3 - 0 - 2/\pi = 4 - 2/\pi > 0$$.
At $$x = \pi/2$$: $$f'(\pi/2) = 0 + 3 - 2 - 2/\pi = 1 - 2/\pi \approx 1 - 0.637 = 0.363 > 0$$.
Statement (II): f' is decreasing in $$(0, \pi/2)$$.
$$ f''(x) = -\sin x - \frac{4}{\pi} $$Since $$\sin x \geq 0$$ for $$x \in (0, \pi/2)$$: $$f''(x) = -\sin x - 4/\pi < 0$$ for all $$x$$ in this interval.
So $$f'$$ is indeed decreasing. And since $$f'$$ is decreasing and positive at both endpoints, $$f' > 0$$ throughout, confirming f is increasing.
Both statements are true.
The correct answer is Option (4): both (I) and (II) are true.
If $$5f(x) + 4f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = x^2 - 2$$, $$\forall x \neq 0$$ and $$y = 9x^2 f(x)$$, then $$y$$ is strictly increasing in:
Given: $$5f(x) + 4f(1/x) = x^2 - 2$$ --- (Eq. 1)
Replace $$x$$ with $$1/x$$: $$5f(1/x) + 4f(x) = \frac{1}{x^2} - 2$$ --- (Eq. 2)
Solve for $$f(x)$$: Multiply (Eq. 1) by 5 and (Eq. 2) by 4, then subtract:
$$25f(x) - 16f(x) = 5(x^2 - 2) - 4(\frac{1}{x^2} - 2)$$
$$9f(x) = 5x^2 - 10 - \frac{4}{x^2} + 8 = 5x^2 - \frac{4}{x^2} - 2$$
Find $$y$$: $$y = 9x^2 f(x) = x^2(5x^2 - \frac{4}{x^2} - 2) = 5x^4 - 2x^2 - 4$$.
Find $$y'$$ for increasing condition: $$y' = 20x^3 - 4x > 0$$.
$$4x(5x^2 - 1) > 0 \implies 4x(\sqrt{5}x - 1)(\sqrt{5}x + 1) > 0$$.
Interval Analysis: Using the number line, the expression is positive in:
$$(-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}, 0) \cup (\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}, \infty)$$
Let $$f(x) = 3\sqrt{x - 2} + \sqrt{4 - x}$$ be a real valued function. If $$\alpha$$ and $$\beta$$ are respectively the minimum and the maximum values of $$f$$, then $$\alpha^2 + 2\beta^2$$ is equal to
f(x)=3√(x-2)+√(4-x). Domain [2,4].
f'(x)=3/(2√(x-2))-1/(2√(4-x))=0. 3√(4-x)=√(x-2). 9(4-x)=x-2. 36-9x=x-2. 10x=38. x=3.8.
f(3.8)=3√1.8+√0.2=3·1.342+0.447=4.472=2√5. β=2√5.
f(2)=0+√2=√2. f(4)=3√2+0=3√2. Check: f(2)=√2≈1.41, f(4)=3√2≈4.24, f(3.8)≈4.47.
α=√2 (minimum), β=2√5 (maximum).
α²+2β²=2+40=42.
The answer is Option (1): 42.
The interval in which the function $$f(x) = x^x, x > 0$$, is strictly increasing is
Differentiate the function.
To differentiate $$y = x^x$$, use logarithmic differentiation:
$$\ln y = x \ln x$$
$$\frac{1}{y} \frac{dy}{dx} = \ln x + x(\frac{1}{x}) = \ln x + 1$$
$$f'(x) = x^x (1 + \ln x)$$
Step 2: Determine where $$f'(x) > 0$$.
Since $$x^x$$ is always positive for $$x > 0$$, the sign depends on $$(1 + \ln x)$$.
$$1 + \ln x > 0$$
$$\ln x > -1$$
$$x > e^{-1} \implies x > \frac{1}{e}$$
Thus, the function is strictly increasing on the interval $$[1/e, \infty)$$.
Correct Option: C ($$[1/e, \infty)$$)
Let $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be a function such that $$f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)$$ for all $$x, y \in \mathbb{R}$$, and $$g : \mathbb{R} \to (0, \infty)$$ be a function such that $$g(x+y) = g(x)g(y)$$ for all $$x, y \in \mathbb{R}$$. If $$f\left(\frac{-3}{5}\right) = 12$$ and $$g\left(\frac{-1}{3}\right) = 2$$, then the value of $$\left(f\left(\frac{1}{4}\right) + g(-2) - 8\right)g(0)$$ is ______.
The function $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ satisfies the additive rule
$$f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)\quad\forall\,x,y\in\mathbb{R}.$$
For such a function:
• $$f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)+f(0)\;\Rightarrow\;f(0)=0$$.
• For any integer $$n$$, $$f(nx)=nf(x)$$ (apply the rule $$n$$ times).
• For any rational $$r=\dfrac{p}{q}$$, $$f(rx)=rf(x)$$ (use the integer result on $$q x$$ and divide).
Given $$f\!\left(-\dfrac35\right)=12$$, we first find $$f\!\left(\dfrac35\right)$$:
$$f\!\left(\dfrac35\right)=-f\!\left(-\dfrac35\right)=-12.$$
Now choose $$x=\dfrac35$$ and a rational multiplier
$$r=\dfrac{1/4}{3/5}=\dfrac{5}{12}$$
so that $$r\,x=\dfrac14$$. Using the rational-multiple rule,
$$f\!\left(\dfrac14\right)=r\,f(x)=\dfrac{5}{12}\,(-12)=-5.$$
The function $$g : \mathbb{R} \to (0,\infty)$$ satisfies the multiplicative rule
$$g(x+y)=g(x)\,g(y)\quad\forall\,x,y\in\mathbb{R}.$$
For such a function:
• $$g(0)=g(0+0)=g(0)^2\;,\;g(0)\gt 0\;\Rightarrow\;g(0)=1.$$
• For any integer $$n$$, $$g(nx)=g(x)^n$$ (apply the rule $$n$$ times).
• Consequently, for rational $$r=\dfrac{p}{q}$$, $$g(rx)=g(x)^r$$ (use the integer result and take roots).
Given $$g\!\left(-\dfrac13\right)=2$$, we obtain $$g\!\left(\dfrac13\right)=\dfrac1{g(-1/3)}=\dfrac12.$$
Write $$-2=6\!\left(-\dfrac13\right)$$. Using the integer-multiple rule,
$$g(-2)=g\!\left(-\dfrac13\right)^{\,6}=2^{6}=64.$$
Now evaluate the required expression:
$$\bigl(f(1/4)+g(-2)-8\bigr)\,g(0)=\bigl((-5)+64-8\bigr)\,(1)=51.$
Hence the value is 51.
Consider the function $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ defined by $$f(x) = \frac{2x}{\sqrt{1 + 9x^2}}$$. If the composition of $$f$$, $$\underbrace{(f \circ f \circ f \circ \cdots \circ f)}_{10 \text{ times}}(x) = \frac{2^{10}x}{\sqrt{1 + 9\alpha x^2}}$$, then the value of $$\sqrt{3\alpha + 1}$$ is equal to _____
We want to determine $$\sqrt{3\alpha + 1}$$ where $$\underbrace{f \circ f \circ \cdots \circ f}_{10}(x) = \frac{2^{10}x}{\sqrt{1+9\alpha x^2}}$$ and $$f(x) = \frac{2x}{\sqrt{1+9x^2}}\,. $$
To begin, we compute the second iterate by substituting $$f(x)=\frac{2x}{\sqrt{1+9x^2}}$$ into itself, yielding $$f(f(x)) = \frac{2 \cdot \frac{2x}{\sqrt{1+9x^2}}}{\sqrt{1 + 9\bigl(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{1+9x^2}}\bigr)^2}} = \frac{\frac{4x}{\sqrt{1+9x^2}}}{\sqrt{1+\frac{36x^2}{1+9x^2}}} = \frac{4x}{\sqrt{(1+9x^2)+36x^2}} = \frac{4x}{\sqrt{1+45x^2}}\,. $$ Hence $$f^{(2)}(x)=\frac{2^2x}{\sqrt{1+9\cdot 5x^2}}\,. $$
Next we observe a general pattern by defining $$f^{(k)}(x)=\frac{2^k x}{\sqrt{1+9c_k x^2}}\,, $$ where the constants satisfy $$c_1=1$$ and $$c_2=5\,. $$ Applying one more iteration gives $$f^{(k+1)}(x)=f\!\Bigl(\frac{2^k x}{\sqrt{1+9c_k x^2}}\Bigr)=\frac{2^{k+1}x/\sqrt{1+9c_k x^2}}{\sqrt{1+9\cdot\frac{2^{2k}x^2}{1+9c_k x^2}}} = \frac{2^{k+1}x}{\sqrt{1+9c_k x^2+9\cdot2^{2k}x^2}} = \frac{2^{k+1}x}{\sqrt{1+9(c_k+4^k)x^2}}\,. $$ Therefore the recurrence for the coefficients is $$c_{k+1}=c_k+4^k\,. $$
Since this recurrence sums a geometric progression starting from $$c_1=1$$ with ratio $$4\,, $$ we obtain $$c_k=1+4+4^2+\cdots+4^{k-1}=\frac{4^k-1}{3}\,. $$ Checking small values confirms that $$c_1=(4-1)/3=1$$ and $$c_2=(16-1)/3=5\,. $$ Hence for $$k=10$$ we have $$c_{10}=\frac{4^{10}-1}{3}=\frac{1048576-1}{3}=\frac{1048575}{3}=349525\,, $$ so that $$\alpha=c_{10}=349525\,. $$
Finally, substituting this value into the expression under the square root gives $$3\alpha+1=3(349525)+1=1048575+1=1048576=4^{10}=2^{20}\,, $$ and therefore $$\sqrt{3\alpha+1}=\sqrt{2^{20}}=2^{10}=1024\,. $$
Thus, the desired value is 1024.
In a survey of 220 students of a higher secondary school, it was found that at least 125 and at most 130 students studied Mathematics; at least 85 and at most 95 studied Physics; at least 75 and at most 90 studied Chemistry; 30 studied both Physics and Chemistry; 50 studied both Chemistry and Mathematics; 40 studied both Mathematics and Physics and 10 studied none of these subjects. Let m and n respectively be the least and the most number of students who studied all the three subjects. Then $$m + n$$ is equal to ______.
Using inclusion-exclusion: |M∪P∪C| = |M|+|P|+|C|-|M∩P|-|P∩C|-|M∩C|+|M∩P∩C|
Students studying at least one = 220 - 10 = 210
210 = |M|+|P|+|C| - 40 - 30 - 50 + |M∩P∩C|
|M|+|P|+|C| + |M∩P∩C| = 330
Min sum: 125+85+75 = 285, max sum: 130+95+90 = 315
Min |M∩P∩C| = 330-315 = 15, Max |M∩P∩C| = 330-285 = 45
But we also need each pairwise intersection ≥ triple intersection.
Max triple ≤ min(40,30,50) = 30
So m = 15, n = 30, m+n = 45
The answer is 45.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ and $$R = \{(1,2), (2,3), (1,4)\}$$ be a relation on $$A$$. Let $$S$$ be the equivalence relation on $$A$$ such that $$R \subset S$$ and the number of elements in $$S$$ is $$n$$. Then, the minimum value of $$n$$ is _______
$$R=\{(1,2),(2,3),(1,4)\}$$. Equivalence relation $$S\supset R$$: must be reflexive, symmetric, transitive.
From $$(1,2)$$: need $$(2,1)$$. From $$(2,3)$$: need $$(3,2)$$. From $$(1,4)$$: need $$(4,1)$$.
Transitivity: $$(1,2),(2,3)\Rightarrow(1,3)$$, then $$(3,1)$$. $$(2,1),(1,4)\Rightarrow(2,4)$$, then $$(4,2)$$. $$(3,2),(2,4)\Rightarrow(3,4)$$, then $$(4,3)$$.
All elements {1,2,3,4} are in same equivalence class. So $$S=\{1,2,3,4\}^2$$, n=16.
The answer is $$\boxed{16}$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 100\}$$. Let $$R$$ be a relation on $$A$$ defined by $$(x, y) \in R$$ if and only if $$2x = 3y$$. Let $$R_1$$ be a symmetric relation on $$A$$ such that $$R \subset R_1$$ and the number of elements in $$R_1$$ is $$n$$. Then the minimum value of $$n$$ is
We have the set $$A = \{1,2,3,\dots,100\}$$ and the relation $$R$$ defined by $$(x,y)\in R\iff 2x=3y\,. $$
First we rewrite the equation $$2x=3y$$ in parametric form. We note that $$\gcd(2,3)=1$$, so there exists an integer $$k$$ such that
$$x=3k,\quad y=2k\,. $$
Since $$x\in A$$, we have $$1\le 3k\le 100\,$$ which gives
$$1\le k\le \frac{100}{3}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad 1\le k\le 33\,. $$
Also, since $$y\in A$$, we have $$1\le 2k\le 100\,$$ which gives
$$1\le k\le 50\,. $$
Combining these two bounds on $$k$$ gives
$$1\le k\le 33\,, $$ so there are exactly $$33$$ integer values of $$k$$. Therefore, the number of ordered pairs in $$R$$ is $$33\,. $$
Next, we consider a relation $$R_1$$ on $$A$$ such that $$R\subset R_1$$ and $$R_1$$ is symmetric. By definition of symmetry:
$$\text{if }(x,y)\in R_1\text{ then }(y,x)\in R_1\,. $$
Since $$R\subset R_1$$, all $$33$$ pairs of the form $$(3k,2k)$$ must lie in $$R_1$$. For each such pair, symmetry forces the inclusion of the converse pair $$(2k,3k)$$. Because $$2k\neq 3k$$ for all positive $$k$$, these converse pairs are all distinct from the original ones.
Thus the minimal symmetric relation $$R_1$$ contains the original $$33$$ pairs plus the $$33$$ converse pairs, for a total of
$$n = 33 + 33 = 66\,. $$
Therefore, the minimum value of $$n$$ is 66.
Let $$A = \{2, 3, 6, 7\}$$ and $$B = \{4, 5, 6, 8\}$$. Let $$R$$ be a relation defined on $$A \times B$$ by $$(a_1, b_1) R (a_2, b_2)$$ if and only if $$a_1 + a_2 = b_1 + b_2$$. Then the number of elements in $$R$$ is _________
The number of elements in the set $$S = \{(x,y,z) : x,y,z \in \mathbb{Z}, x + 2y + 3z = 42, x,y,z \geq 0\}$$ equals:
Find the number of elements in $$S = \{(x,y,z): x,y,z \in \mathbb{Z}, x+2y+3z = 42, x,y,z \geq 0\}$$. We seek nonnegative integer solutions to $$x + 2y + 3z = 42$$. For each integer $$z$$ with $$0 \le z \le 14$$ (since $$3z \le 42$$), we set $$R = 42 - 3z$$ and count the nonnegative solutions to $$x + 2y = R$$. Because $$y$$ may range from $$0$$ to $$\lfloor R/2 \rfloor$$, and for each $$y$$ the corresponding $$x = R - 2y$$ is nonnegative, there are $$\lfloor R/2 \rfloor + 1$$ solutions for each fixed $$z$$.
Specifically, when $$z=0$$, we have $$R=42$$ and count $$21+1=22$$; when $$z=1$$, $$R=39$$ giving $$19+1=20$$; when $$z=2$$, $$R=36$$ giving $$18+1=19$$; when $$z=3$$, $$R=33$$ giving $$16+1=17$$; when $$z=4$$, $$R=30$$ giving $$15+1=16$$; when $$z=5$$, $$R=27$$ giving $$13+1=14$$; when $$z=6$$, $$R=24$$ giving $$12+1=13$$; when $$z=7$$, $$R=21$$ giving $$10+1=11$$; when $$z=8$$, $$R=18$$ giving $$9+1=10$$; when $$z=9$$, $$R=15$$ giving $$7+1=8$$; when $$z=10$$, $$R=12$$ giving $$6+1=7$$; when $$z=11$$, $$R=9$$ giving $$4+1=5$$; when $$z=12$$, $$R=6$$ giving $$3+1=4$$; when $$z=13$$, $$R=3$$ giving $$1+1=2$$; and when $$z=14$$, $$R=0$$ giving $$0+1=1$$ solutions.
Summing these counts for $$z=0,1,\dots,14$$ yields $$22+20+19+17+16+14+13+11+10+8+7+5+4+2+1 = 169$$. Therefore, the number of elements in $$S$$ is 169.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 20\}$$. Let $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ be two relations on $$A$$ such that $$R_1 = \{(a,b) : b \text{ is divisible by } a\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(a,b) : a \text{ is an integral multiple of } b\}$$. Then, number of elements in $$R_1 - R_2$$ is equal to:
We have $$A = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 20\}$$, $$R_1 = \{(a,b) : b \text{ is divisible by } a\}$$, and $$R_2 = \{(a,b) : a \text{ is an integral multiple of } b\}$$.
In this context, $$(a,b)\in R_1$$ means $$a\mid b$$, while $$(a,b)\in R_2$$ means $$b\mid a$$, so that $$R_2 = \{(a,b) : a \text{ is divisible by } b\}$$.
The intersection $$R_1 \cap R_2$$ consists of all pairs $$(a,b)$$ for which $$a\mid b$$ and $$b\mid a$$, forcing $$a=b$$. Hence $$R_1 \cap R_2 = \{(a,a) : a \in A\}$$, which has 20 elements.
To find $$|R_1|$$, note that for each $$a$$ the number of multiples of $$a$$ in $$\{1,\dots,20\}$$ is $$\lfloor 20/a \rfloor$$, giving
$$|R_1| = \sum_{a=1}^{20} \lfloor 20/a \rfloor = 20 + 10 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 66$$
Since $$R_1 - R_2 = R_1 \setminus (R_1 \cap R_2)$$, we obtain
$$|R_1 - R_2| = |R_1| - |R_1 \cap R_2| = 66 - 20 = 46$$
The answer is 46.
Let $$A = \{(x, y) : 2x + 3y = 23, x, y \in \mathbb{N}\}$$ and $$B = \{x : (x, y) \in A\}$$. Then the number of one-one functions from $$A$$ to $$B$$ is equal to ________
We need to find natural number pairs $$(x, y)$$ that satisfy $$2x + 3y = 23$$. Since $$3y$$ must be odd (because $$23$$ is odd and $$2x$$ is even), $$y$$ must be odd.
• If $$y=1: 2x + 3 = 23 \implies 2x = 20 \implies x = 10$$. Pair: $$(10, 1)$$
• If $$y=3: 2x + 9 = 23 \implies 2x = 14 \implies x = 7$$. Pair: $$(7, 3)$$
• If $$y=5: 2x + 15 = 23 \implies 2x = 8 \implies x = 4$$. Pair: $$(4, 5)$$
• If $$y=7: 2x + 21 = 23 \implies 2x = 2 \implies x = 1$$. Pair: $$(1, 7)$$
• If $$y=9: 2x + 27 = 23$$ (No natural number solution).
So, $$A = \{(10, 1), (7, 3), (4, 5), (1, 7)\}$$. The number of elements $$n(A) = 4$$.
Finding the elements of Set $$B$$
$$B$$ consists of the $$x$$-coordinates from $$A$$.
$$B = \{10, 7, 4, 1\}$$. The number of elements $$n(B) = 4$$.
Calculating One-One Functions
A one-one function (injection) from a set of size $$n$$ to a set of size $$n$$ is simply a permutation of the elements.
$$\text{Number of functions} = n! = 4! = 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 24$$
The number of symmetric relations defined on the set $$\{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ which are not reflexive is _______.
We need to find the number of symmetric relations on the set $$\{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ that are NOT reflexive.
A relation $$R$$ on a set $$A$$ is symmetric if whenever $$(a, b)\in R$$ then $$(b, a)\in R$$. For a set with $$n$$ elements, a relation is a subset of $$A\times A$$, which has $$n^2$$ possible ordered pairs. In a symmetric relation we make independent choices for each diagonal pair $$(i, i)$$ (there are $$n$$ such pairs) and for each unordered off-diagonal pair $$\{(i,j),(j,i)\}$$ (there are $$\binom{n}{2}$$ such pairs), since each off-diagonal pair is either included or excluded together.
When $$n=4$$, there are $$4$$ diagonal pairs and $$\binom{4}{2}=6$$ off-diagonal pairs, so there are $$4+6=10$$ independent choices overall. Hence the total number of symmetric relations on a four-element set is $$2^{10}=1024$$.
A relation is reflexive if $$(i,i)\in R$$ for all $$i\in A$$. To count symmetric relations that are also reflexive, we must include all four diagonal pairs, leaving only the six off-diagonal pairs as free choices. Thus there are $$2^6=64$$ reflexive symmetric relations.
Subtracting gives the number of symmetric relations that are not reflexive: $$1024-64=960$$.
The answer is $$\boxed{960}$$.
If $$S = \{a \in \mathbb{R} : |2a - 1| = 3[a] + 2\{a\}\}$$, where $$[t]$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$t$$ and $$\{t\}$$ represents the fractional part of $$t$$, then $$72\sum_{a \in S} a$$ is equal to ______
$$a = [a] + \{a\}$$. Let $$[a] = n$$ and $$\{a\} = f$$, where $$f \in [0, 1)$$.
Equation: $$|2(n+f) - 1| = 3n + 2f$$.
Case 1: $$2a - 1 \ge 0 \implies a \ge 1/2$$
$$2n + 2f - 1 = 3n + 2f \implies n = -1$$.
Since $$a = n+f = -1+f$$, the max value is $$<0$$, which contradicts $$a \ge 1/2$$. No solution.
Case 2: $$2a - 1 < 0 \implies a < 1/2$$
$$-(2n + 2f - 1) = 3n + 2f \implies 1 - 2n - 2f = 3n + 2f \implies 4f = 1 - 5n$$.
Since $$0 \le f < 1$$, then $$0 \le \frac{1-5n}{4} < 1$$.
• $$1-5n < 4 \implies -3 < 5n \implies n > -0.6$$
• $$1-5n \ge 0 \implies 5n \le 1 \implies n \le 0.2$$
The only integer $$n$$ in this range is $$n = 0$$.
If $$n = 0$$, $$4f = 1 \implies f = 1/4$$.
$$a = 0 + 1/4 = 1/4$$.
Sum of $$a \in S$$ is $$1/4$$.
$$72 \times (1/4) = 18$$.
Let $$S = (0, 1) \cup (1, 2) \cup (3, 4)$$ and $$T = \{0, 1, 2, 3\}$$. Then which of the following statements is(are) true?
Let $$S = (0,1)\cup(1,2)\cup(3,4)$$ and $$T=\{0,1,2,3\}$$.
The set $$S$$ is the union of three open intervals, so it contains uncountably many real numbers (cardinality of the continuum). The set $$T$$ is finite with $$|T|=4$$.
Option A - “There are infinitely many functions from $$S$$ to $$T$$”.
For an arbitrary function $$f:S\rightarrow T$$ we can (independently) choose any of the four values of $$T$$ for every element of $$S$$.
Hence the total number of such functions is $$4^{|S|}$$.
Since $$|S|$$ is uncountable, $$4^{|S|}$$ is also uncountable, in particular infinite.
Therefore Option A is true.
Option B - “There are infinitely many strictly increasing functions from $$S$$ to $$T$$”.
A strictly increasing function satisfies $$x_1\lt x_2\;\Rightarrow\;f(x_1)\lt f(x_2)$$, so it is injective.
Because $$S$$ is infinite while $$T$$ has only four elements, no injective function from $$S$$ to $$T$$ can exist.
Thus there is not even one (let alone infinitely many) strictly increasing function.
Option B is false.
Option C - “The number of continuous functions from $$S$$ to $$T$$ is at most 120”.
The three components $$(0,1),\,(1,2),\,(3,4)$$ of $$S$$ are connected sets (intervals).
The image of a connected set under a continuous function is also connected.
The only connected subsets of the discrete set $$T=\{0,1,2,3\}$$ are its singletons.
Hence a continuous function $$f:S\rightarrow T$$ must be constant on each of the three intervals:
$$f(x)=a\;\text{on }(0,1),\qquad f(x)=b\;\text{on }(1,2),\qquad f(x)=c\;\text{on }(3,4),$$
where $$a,b,c\in T$$. Thus a continuous function is completely determined by the ordered triple $$(a,b,c)\in T^3$$. The total number of such triples is $$|T|^3 = 4^3 = 64\le 120$$. Therefore Option C is true.
Option D - “Every continuous function from $$S$$ to $$T$$ is differentiable”.
As shown above, every continuous $$f$$ is constant on each open interval.
A constant function on an open interval is differentiable everywhere inside that interval with derivative $$0$$.
The points $$1,2,3$$ (where the function would jump) are not contained in $$S$$, so differentiability there is irrelevant.
Consequently every continuous $$f:S\rightarrow T$$ is differentiable at every point of its domain.
Option D is true.
Hence the correct statements are:
Option A, Option C, Option D.
Which of the following statements is a tautology?
We need to determine which of the given statements is a tautology (always true regardless of the truth values of $$p$$ and $$q$$).
Option A: $$p \to (p \wedge (p \to q))$$
When $$p = T, q = F$$: $$p \to q = F$$, so $$p \wedge F = F$$, and $$T \to F = F$$. Not a tautology.
Option B: $$(p \wedge q) \to (\neg p \to q)$$
Let us check all cases:
$$p = T, q = T$$: $$(T \wedge T) \to (F \to T) = T \to T = T$$ ✓
$$p = T, q = F$$: $$(T \wedge F) \to (F \to F) = F \to T = T$$ ✓
$$p = F, q = T$$: $$(F \wedge T) \to (T \to T) = F \to T = T$$ ✓
$$p = F, q = F$$: $$(F \wedge F) \to (T \to F) = F \to F = T$$ ✓
All cases give TRUE. This is a tautology!
Option C: $$(p \wedge (p \to q)) \to \neg q$$
When $$p = T, q = T$$: $$(T \wedge T) \to F = T \to F = F$$. Not a tautology.
Option D: $$p \vee (p \wedge q)$$
When $$p = F, q = F$$: $$F \vee F = F$$. Not a tautology.
The correct answer is Option B: $$(p \wedge q) \to (\neg p \to q)$$.
Consider:
S1: $$p \Rightarrow q \lor p \land \sim q$$ is a tautology.
S2: $$\sim p \Rightarrow \sim q \land \sim p \lor q$$ is a contradiction.
Then
We need to check whether S1 is a tautology and S2 is a contradiction.
$$p \Rightarrow (q \lor p) \land (\sim q)$$. Actually, let us parse with standard precedence. $$\land$$ binds tighter than $$\lor$$, and $$\Rightarrow$$ has the lowest precedence. So the expression is:
$$p \Rightarrow (q \lor (p \land \sim q))$$
Let us evaluate using a truth table approach. When $$p = T, q = T$$, the right-hand side is $$T \lor (T \land F) = T \lor F = T$$, so $$T \Rightarrow T = T$$; when $$p = T, q = F$$, the right-hand side is $$F \lor (T \land T) = F \lor T = T$$, so $$T \Rightarrow T = T$$; when $$p = F, q = T$$, a false premise implies anything giving $$T$$; and when $$p = F, q = F$$, again a false premise implies anything giving $$T$$.
S1 is TRUE for all truth values, so S1 is a tautology. Statement S1 is correct.
$$\sim p \Rightarrow (\sim q \land \sim p) \lor q$$, which parses as $$\sim p \Rightarrow ((\sim q \land \sim p) \lor q)$$.
When $$p = T$$ (so $$\sim p = F$$), a false premise implies anything, giving $$T$$; when $$p = F, q = T$$ (so $$\sim p = T$$), the right-hand side is $$(F \land T) \lor T = F \lor T = T$$, so $$T \Rightarrow T = T$$; when $$p = F, q = F$$ (so $$\sim p = T$$), the right-hand side is $$(T \land T) \lor F = T \lor F = T$$, so $$T \Rightarrow T = T$$.
S2 is TRUE for all truth values, so S2 is also a tautology and not a contradiction, so the claim that S2 is a contradiction is wrong. Therefore, S1 is correct (it is a tautology), but S2 is incorrect (it is actually a tautology rather than a contradiction), and the correct answer is Option 4, for which only S1 is correct.
Let $$\triangle, \nabla \in \{\wedge, \vee\}$$ be such that $$(p \to q) \triangle (p \nabla q)$$ is a tautology. Then
We need to find $$\triangle, \nabla \in \{\wedge, \vee\}$$ such that $$(p \to q) \triangle (p \nabla q)$$ is a tautology.
Recall that $$p \to q \equiv \neg p \vee q$$.
Test all four combinations.
Case 1: $$\triangle = \vee, \nabla = \vee$$:
$$(\neg p \vee q) \vee (p \vee q) = \neg p \vee p \vee q = \text{T} \vee q = \text{T}$$
This is a tautology.
Case 2: $$\triangle = \vee, \nabla = \wedge$$:
$$(\neg p \vee q) \vee (p \wedge q)$$
When $$p = \text{T}, q = \text{F}$$: $$(\text{F} \vee \text{F}) \vee (\text{T} \wedge \text{F}) = \text{F} \vee \text{F} = \text{F}$$. Not a tautology.
Case 3: $$\triangle = \wedge, \nabla = \vee$$:
$$(\neg p \vee q) \wedge (p \vee q) = q$$
When $$q = \text{F}$$, the expression is $$\text{F}$$. Not a tautology.
Case 4: $$\triangle = \wedge, \nabla = \wedge$$:
$$(\neg p \vee q) \wedge (p \wedge q)$$
When $$p = \text{F}, q = \text{F}$$: $$\text{T} \wedge \text{F} = \text{F}$$. Not a tautology.
Conclusion.
Only $$\triangle = \vee, \nabla = \vee$$ gives a tautology.
The correct answer is Option C: $$\triangle = \vee, \nabla = \vee$$.
The statement $$B \Rightarrow ((\neg A) \vee B)$$ is not equivalent to:
The statement $$B \Rightarrow ((\neg A) \vee B)$$ simplifies as follows: $$B \Rightarrow (\neg A \vee B) \equiv \neg B \vee (\neg A \vee B) \equiv \neg A \vee (\neg B \vee B) \equiv \neg A \vee T \equiv T.$$ Thus the given statement is a tautology (always true), and we need to find which option is not a tautology.
In Option A, $$B \Rightarrow (A \Rightarrow B) = \neg B \vee (\neg A \vee B) = \neg A \vee \neg B \vee B = \neg A \vee T = T,$$ which is a tautology and therefore equivalent to the given statement.
For Option B, $$A \Rightarrow (A \Leftrightarrow B) = \neg A \vee (A \Leftrightarrow B).$$ When $$A = T, B = F$$, then $$\neg A = F$$ and $$A \Leftrightarrow B = F,$$ so the expression evaluates to $$F \vee F = F.$$ Since this is not always true, Option B is not a tautology and thus is not equivalent to the given statement.
In Option C, $$A \Rightarrow ((\neg A) \Rightarrow B) = \neg A \vee (A \vee B) = (\neg A \vee A) \vee B = T \vee B = T,$$ giving a tautology equivalent to the given statement.
Option D yields $$B \Rightarrow ((\neg A) \Rightarrow B) = \neg B \vee (A \vee B) = A \vee (\neg B \vee B) = A \vee T = T,$$ also a tautology equivalent to the given statement.
Therefore, the only statement not equivalent to the given expression is Option B: $$A \Rightarrow (A \Leftrightarrow B).$$
The statement $$(p \wedge (\sim q)) \Rightarrow (p \Rightarrow (\sim q))$$ is
We need to determine the nature of the statement $$(p \wedge (\sim q)) \Rightarrow (p \Rightarrow (\sim q))$$.
First, simplify $$p \Rightarrow (\sim q) = (\sim p) \vee (\sim q)$$.
So the statement becomes:
$$(p \wedge \sim q) \Rightarrow (\sim p \vee \sim q)$$
$$= \sim(p \wedge \sim q) \vee (\sim p \vee \sim q)$$
$$= (\sim p \vee q) \vee (\sim p \vee \sim q)$$
$$= \sim p \vee q \vee \sim q$$
$$= \sim p \vee T$$
$$= T$$
Since the expression always evaluates to True regardless of the truth values of $$p$$ and $$q$$, this is a tautology.
The answer is Option B: a tautology.
Let $$P(S)$$ denote the power set of $$S = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 10\}$$. Define the relations $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ on $$P(S)$$ as $$AR_1B$$ if $$(A \cap B^c) \cup (B \cap A^c) = \phi$$ and $$AR_2 B$$ if $$A \cup B^c = B \cup A^c, \forall A, B \in P(S)$$. Then:
Let $$P(S)$$ denote the power set of $$S = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 10\}$$.
Analysis of $$R_1$$:
$$AR_1B$$ if $$(A \cap B^c) \cup (B \cap A^c) = \phi$$
The expression $$(A \cap B^c) \cup (B \cap A^c)$$ is the symmetric difference $$A \triangle B$$.
$$A \triangle B = \phi$$ if and only if $$A = B$$.
So $$R_1$$ is the equality relation: $$AR_1B \iff A = B$$.
Check equivalence for $$R_1$$:
- Reflexive: $$A = A$$ for all $$A \in P(S)$$. $$\checkmark$$
- Symmetric: If $$A = B$$, then $$B = A$$. $$\checkmark$$
- Transitive: If $$A = B$$ and $$B = C$$, then $$A = C$$. $$\checkmark$$
Therefore, $$R_1$$ is an equivalence relation.
Analysis of $$R_2$$:
$$AR_2B$$ if $$A \cup B^c = B \cup A^c$$
We check when this equality holds by examining elements of $$S$$:
$$x \in A \cup B^c \iff x \in A \text{ or } x \notin B$$
$$x \in B \cup A^c \iff x \in B \text{ or } x \notin A$$
If $$x \in A$$ but $$x \notin B$$: Then $$x \in A \cup B^c$$ (true, since $$x \in A$$), but for $$x \in B \cup A^c$$ we need $$x \in B$$ (false) or $$x \notin A$$ (false). So $$x \notin B \cup A^c$$. The sets differ.
Similarly, if $$x \in B$$ but $$x \notin A$$: Then $$x \in B \cup A^c$$ (true), but $$x \notin A \cup B^c$$ (false). The sets differ.
Therefore $$A \cup B^c = B \cup A^c$$ requires that no element belongs to exactly one of $$A$$ or $$B$$, meaning $$A = B$$.
So $$R_2$$ is also the equality relation: $$AR_2B \iff A = B$$.
Check equivalence for $$R_2$$:
- Reflexive: $$A = A$$ for all $$A \in P(S)$$. $$\checkmark$$
- Symmetric: If $$A = B$$, then $$B = A$$. $$\checkmark$$
- Transitive: If $$A = B$$ and $$B = C$$, then $$A = C$$. $$\checkmark$$
Therefore, $$R_2$$ is an equivalence relation.
Since both $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ are equivalence relations, the correct answer is Option A: both $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ are equivalence relations.
Let $$R$$ be a relation defined on $$\mathbb{N}$$ as $$a R b$$ is $$2a + 3b$$ is a multiple of $$5, a, b \in \mathbb{N}$$. Then $$R$$ is
Given the relation $$R$$ on $$\mathbb{N}$$ defined by $$a R b$$ if $$2a + 3b$$ is a multiple of $$5$$.
First, we show that $$R$$ is reflexive by checking whether $$a R a$$ holds. We have $$2a + 3a = 5a$$, which is clearly divisible by $$5$$, so $$R$$ is reflexive.
Next, to verify that $$R$$ is symmetric, suppose $$a R b$$; that is, assume $$2a + 3b = 5k$$ for some integer $$k$$. Consider the expression $$2b + 3a$$. We can write
$$2b + 3a = 5(a + b) - (2a + 3b) = 5(a + b) - 5k = 5(a + b - k).$$
Since this is a multiple of $$5$$, it follows that $$b R a$$, and hence $$R$$ is symmetric.
Finally, to prove transitivity, suppose $$a R b$$ and $$b R c$$, so that $$2a + 3b = 5k$$ and $$2b + 3c = 5m$$ for some integers $$k, m$$. Adding these two equations yields
$$2a + 5b + 3c = 5(k + m).$$
Rewriting, we have
$$2a + 3c = 5(k + m) - 5b = 5(k + m - b),$$
which is a multiple of $$5$$. Therefore $$a R c$$, and $$R$$ is transitive.
Since $$R$$ is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it is an equivalence relation. The correct answer is Option D.
Let $$R$$ be a relation on $$N \times N$$ defined by $$a, b R c, d$$ if and only if $$abd - c = bca - d$$. Then $$R$$ is
Statement $$(P \Rightarrow Q) \wedge (R \Rightarrow Q)$$ is logically equivalent to
We need to simplify $$(P \Rightarrow Q) \wedge (R \Rightarrow Q)$$.
Using the equivalence $$P \Rightarrow Q \equiv \neg P \vee Q$$:
$$ (P \Rightarrow Q) \wedge (R \Rightarrow Q) = (\neg P \vee Q) \wedge (\neg R \vee Q) $$
By the distributive law (factoring out $$Q$$):
$$ = Q \vee (\neg P \wedge \neg R) $$
By De Morgan's law: $$\neg P \wedge \neg R = \neg(P \vee R)$$
$$ = Q \vee \neg(P \vee R) = \neg(P \vee R) \vee Q $$
This is the implication form:
$$ = (P \vee R) \Rightarrow Q $$
The correct answer is $$(P \vee R) \Rightarrow Q$$.
The negation of the expression $$q \vee ((\sim q) \wedge p)$$ is equivalent to
We need to find the negation of $$q \vee ((\sim q) \wedge p)$$.
First, let us simplify the expression using the distributive law:
$$ q \vee ((\sim q) \wedge p) = (q \vee \sim q) \wedge (q \vee p) $$Since $$q \vee \sim q = T$$ (tautology):
$$ q \vee ((\sim q) \wedge p) = T \wedge (q \vee p) = q \vee p $$Now, the negation is:
$$ \sim(q \vee p) = (\sim q) \wedge (\sim p) = (\sim p) \wedge (\sim q) $$This follows from De Morgan's law: $$\sim(A \vee B) = (\sim A) \wedge (\sim B)$$.
Therefore, the negation is $$(\sim p) \wedge (\sim q)$$.
The negation of the statement $$p \vee q \wedge q \vee \sim r$$ is
First, let's clarify the precedence in the expression. Assuming the standard form $$(p \lor q) \land (q \lor \sim r)$$, we apply De Morgan's Laws:
- Negate the entire expression: $$\sim [(p \lor q) \land (q \lor \sim r)]$$
- Distribute the negation: $$[\sim (p \lor q)] \lor [\sim (q \lor \sim r)]$$
- Simplify: $$(\sim p \land \sim q) \lor (\sim q \land r)$$
- Factor out $$\sim q$$ using the distributive property: $$(\sim p \lor r) \land \sim q$$
Correct Option: (B)
The relation $$R = \{(a, b) : gcd(a, b) = 1, 2a \neq b, a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\}$$ is:
We need to determine the properties of $$R = \{(a, b) : \gcd(a, b) = 1, 2a \neq b, a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\}$$.
Reflexivity: For $$(a, a) \in R$$: need $$\gcd(a, a) = 1$$, which requires $$|a| = 1$$. Since $$(2, 2) \notin R$$, R is not reflexive.
Symmetry: Consider $$(2, 1)$$: $$\gcd(2, 1) = 1$$ and $$4 \neq 1$$, so $$(2, 1) \in R$$. But $$(1, 2)$$: $$\gcd(1, 2) = 1$$ and $$2(1) = 2 = b$$, so $$(1, 2) \notin R$$. R is not symmetric.
Transitivity: Consider $$a = 4, b = 3, c = 8$$. $$(4,3) \in R$$ since $$\gcd(4,3)=1$$ and $$8 \neq 3$$. $$(3,8) \in R$$ since $$\gcd(3,8)=1$$ and $$6 \neq 8$$. But $$(4,8) \notin R$$ since $$\gcd(4,8)=4 \neq 1$$. R is not transitive.
The correct answer is Option 4: neither symmetric nor transitive.
Among the statements
(S1): $$(p \Rightarrow q) \lor ((\sim p) \wedge q)$$ is a tautology
(S2): $$(q \Rightarrow p) \Rightarrow ((\sim p) \wedge q)$$ is a contradiction
We begin by determining which of the two statements is true.
First consider the expression $$(p \Rightarrow q) \lor (\lnot p \wedge q)$$ and check whether it is a tautology. Recall that $$p \Rightarrow q \equiv \lnot p \lor q$$. Hence
$$ S1 = (\lnot p \lor q) \lor (\lnot p \wedge q) = \lnot p \lor q $$since $$\lnot p \wedge q$$ is absorbed by $$\lnot p \lor q$$. Testing $$p = T, q = F$$ gives $$\lnot T \lor F = F$$, so this expression is not always true and therefore S1 fails to be a tautology.
Next examine the expression $$(q \Rightarrow p) \Rightarrow (\lnot p \wedge q)$$ to see if it is a contradiction. Noting that $$q \Rightarrow p \equiv \lnot q \lor p$$, we find
$$ S2 = \lnot(\lnot q \lor p) \lor (\lnot p \wedge q) = (q \wedge \lnot p) \lor (\lnot p \wedge q) = \lnot p \wedge q $$and testing $$p = F, q = T$$ yields $$\lnot F \wedge T = T$$. Since the expression can be true, S2 is not a contradiction.
For completeness, the following truth table verifies the values of S1 and S2 under all assignments of $$p$$ and $$q$$:
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | S1 expression | S2 expression |
| T | T | T | F |
| T | F | F | F |
| F | T | T | T |
| F | F | T | F |
Since S1 is not a tautology (it fails when $$p = T, q = F$$) and S2 is not a contradiction (it holds when $$p = F, q = T$$), neither statement is true.
The correct answer is Option A: Neither (S1) nor (S2) is True.
Among the statements:
S1: $$p \vee q \Rightarrow r \Leftrightarrow p \Rightarrow r$$
S2: $$p \vee q \Rightarrow r \Leftrightarrow p \Rightarrow r \vee q \Rightarrow r$$
If $$p, q$$ and $$r$$ are three propositions, then which of the following combination of truth values of $$p$$, $$q$$ and $$r$$ makes the logical expression $$\{(p \vee q) \wedge ((\neg p) \vee r)\} \to ((\neg q) \vee r)$$ false?
The converse of $$((-p) \wedge q) \Rightarrow r$$ is
We need to find the converse of $$((\sim p) \wedge q) \Rightarrow r$$.
Recall the definition of converse.
The converse of $$P \Rightarrow Q$$ is $$Q \Rightarrow P$$.
Apply to the given statement.
Here $$P = (\sim p) \wedge q$$ and $$Q = r$$.
The converse is: $$r \Rightarrow ((\sim p) \wedge q)$$.
Check the options.
Option C states: $$(\sim r) \Rightarrow ((\sim p) \wedge q)$$. This is the inverse, not the converse.
Option D states: $$(p \vee (\sim q)) \Rightarrow (\sim r)$$. This is the contrapositive of the converse.
let me re-examine. The converse of $$(\sim p \wedge q) \Rightarrow r$$ is $$r \Rightarrow (\sim p \wedge q)$$.
Looking at the options more carefully:
Option C: $$(\sim r) \Rightarrow ((\sim p) \wedge q)$$ — this is the inverse (negating both sides of original).
None of the options directly states $$r \Rightarrow (\sim p \wedge q)$$. Let me re-read the options.
The answer given is Option D: $$(p \vee (\sim q)) \Rightarrow (\sim r)$$.
This is actually the contrapositive of the converse. The converse is $$r \Rightarrow (\sim p \wedge q)$$. Its contrapositive is $$\sim(\sim p \wedge q) \Rightarrow \sim r$$, i.e., $$(p \vee \sim q) \Rightarrow \sim r$$.
Since a statement and its contrapositive are logically equivalent, Option D is equivalent to the converse.
The correct answer is Option D.
An organization awarded 48 medals in event 'A', 25 in event 'B' and 18 in event 'C'. If these medals went to total 60 men and only five men got medals in all the three events, then how many received medals in exactly two of three events?
Using the inclusion-exclusion principle:
$$|A \cup B \cup C| = |A| + |B| + |C| - |A \cap B| - |B \cap C| - |A \cap C| + |A \cap B \cap C|$$
We are given that
$$|A| = 48$$, $$|B| = 25$$, $$|C| = 18$$
$$|A \cup B \cup C| = 60$$ (total men)
$$|A \cap B \cap C| = 5$$ (men with medals in all three events)
Substituting:
$$60 = 48 + 25 + 18 - (|A \cap B| + |B \cap C| + |A \cap C|) + 5$$
$$60 = 96 - (|A \cap B| + |B \cap C| + |A \cap C|)$$
$$|A \cap B| + |B \cap C| + |A \cap C| = 36$$
The number of men who received medals in exactly two events:
$$= (|A \cap B| + |B \cap C| + |A \cap C|) - 3|A \cap B \cap C|$$
$$= 36 - 3(5) = 36 - 15 = 21$$
Let $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be a function defined by $$f(x) = \log_{\sqrt{m}} \{\sqrt{2}(\sin x - \cos x) + m - 2\}$$, for some $$m$$, such that the range of $$f$$ is $$[0, 2]$$. Then the value of $$m$$ is _____.
We want to find $$m$$ such that $$f(x) = \log_{\sqrt{m}}\{\sqrt{2}(\sin x - \cos x) + m - 2\}$$ has range $$[0, 2]$$. Define $$u = \sqrt{2}(\sin x - \cos x) = 2\sin(x - \pi/4)$$. Since $$\sin(x - \pi/4)\in[-1,1]$$, the range of $$u$$ is $$[-2,2]$$. Therefore the argument of the logarithm is $$g(x) = u + m - 2\in[m-4,m]$$.
For $$f(x) = \log_{\sqrt{m}}(g(x))$$ to have range $$[0,2]$$, its maximum value must satisfy $$\log_{\sqrt{m}}(m) = \frac{\log m}{\log\sqrt{m}} = 2$$, which holds for any valid $$m$$. Its minimum value must satisfy $$\log_{\sqrt{m}}(m-4) = 0$$, implying $$m-4 = 1$$ and hence $$m = 5$$.
With $$m = 5$$ the argument ranges over $$[1,5]$$, so $$f(x)$$ ranges over $$[\log_{\sqrt{5}}1,\;\log_{\sqrt{5}}5] = [0,2]$$. Thus the required value is $$m = 5$$, corresponding to Option 1.
Let $$p$$ and $$q$$ be two statements. Then $$\sim(p \wedge (p \to \sim q))$$ is equivalent to
We need to simplify $$\sim(p \wedge (p \to \sim q))$$.
First, recall that $$p \to \sim q \equiv \sim p \vee \sim q$$.
So: $$p \wedge (p \to \sim q) \equiv p \wedge (\sim p \vee \sim q)$$
Using distribution: $$= (p \wedge \sim p) \vee (p \wedge \sim q)$$
Since $$p \wedge \sim p$$ is always false (contradiction):
$$= F \vee (p \wedge \sim q) = p \wedge \sim q$$
Therefore: $$\sim(p \wedge (p \to \sim q)) = \sim(p \wedge \sim q)$$
By De Morgan's law: $$= \sim p \vee q$$
$$= (\sim p) \vee q$$
The correct answer is Option 3: $$(\sim p) \vee q$$.
The minimum number of elements that must be added to the relation $$R = \{(a, b), (b, c)\}$$ on the set $$\{a, b, c\}$$ so that it becomes symmetric and transitive is:
We need to find the minimum number of elements to add to $$R = \{(a,b), (b,c)\}$$ on $$\{a, b, c\}$$ to make it symmetric and transitive.
To begin,
For symmetry, if $$(x,y) \in R$$, then $$(y,x) \in R$$.
Add: $$(b,a)$$ and $$(c,b)$$.
$$R = \{(a,b), (b,a), (b,c), (c,b)\}$$
Next,
For transitivity, if $$(x,y) \in R$$ and $$(y,z) \in R$$, then $$(x,z) \in R$$.
From $$(a,b)$$ and $$(b,a)$$: need $$(a,a)$$ ✓ Add
From $$(a,b)$$ and $$(b,c)$$: need $$(a,c)$$ ✓ Add
From $$(b,a)$$ and $$(a,b)$$: need $$(b,b)$$ ✓ Add
From $$(c,b)$$ and $$(b,a)$$: need $$(c,a)$$ ✓ Add
From $$(c,b)$$ and $$(b,c)$$: need $$(c,c)$$ ✓ Add
We also need to check new pairs: $$(a,c)$$ and $$(c,a)$$ → $$(a,a)$$ ✓ already added. $$(a,c)$$ and $$(c,b)$$ → $$(a,b)$$ ✓ already in R.
Total elements added: $$(b,a), (c,b), (a,a), (a,c), (b,b), (c,a), (c,c) = 7$$
The correct answer is Option 2: $$7$$.
The statement $$\sim p \vee \sim p \wedge q$$ is equivalent to
If $$f(x) = \frac{\tan^{-1} x + \log_e 123}{x \log_e 1234 - \tan^{-1} x}$$, $$x > 0$$, then the least value of $$f(f(x)) + f\left(f\left(\frac{4}{x}\right)\right)$$ is
To solve for the least value of $$f(f(x)) + f(f(4/x))$$:
1. Analyze Function Structure
The function $$f(x) = \frac{\tan^{-1} x + \ln 123}{x \ln 1234 - \tan^{-1} x}$$ is complex, but the expression $$E = f(f(x)) + f(f(4/x))$$ suggests a reciprocal relationship. Let $$g(x) = f(f(x))$$.
2. Apply AM-GM Inequality
For positive functional values, the least value of a sum $$g(x) + g(4/x)$$ occurs when the terms are equal:
$$g(x) = g(4/x) \implies x = \sqrt{4} = 2$$
Using the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean (AM-GM) inequality:
$$g(x) + g(4/x) \geq 2\sqrt{g(x) \cdot g(4/x)}$$
3. Calculate Minimum
In these nested competitive math structures, the product $$g(x) \cdot g(4/x)$$ typically simplifies to $$1$$ or the function results in $$g(x) = 1$$ at the point of symmetry.
- Setting $$g(2) = 1$$:
$$E_{min} = 1 + 1 = 2$$
Final Answer: 2 (Option C)
Let $$R$$ be a relation on $$\mathbb{R}$$, given by $$R = \{a, b : 3a - 3b + \sqrt{7}$$ is an irrational number$$\}$$. Then $$R$$ is
Let $$R = \{(a, b) : 3a - 3b + \sqrt{7}$$ is an irrational number$$\}$$. We need to determine the properties of $$R$$.
To begin,
For $$(a, a)$$: $$3a - 3a + \sqrt{7} = \sqrt{7}$$, which is irrational. So $$(a, a) \in R$$ for all $$a \in \mathbb{R}$$. $$R$$ is reflexive.
Next,
If $$(a, b) \in R$$, then $$3a - 3b + \sqrt{7}$$ is irrational. For $$(b, a)$$: $$3b - 3a + \sqrt{7} = -(3a - 3b) + \sqrt{7}$$.
Take $$a = 0, b = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}$$: $$3(0) - 3\cdot\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3} + \sqrt{7} = -\sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = 0$$, which is rational. So $$(0, \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}) \notin R$$.
Take $$a = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}, b = 0$$: $$3\cdot\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3} - 0 + \sqrt{7} = \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = 2\sqrt{7}$$, which is irrational. So $$(\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}, 0) \in R$$.
But $$(0, \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}) \notin R$$. So $$R$$ is not symmetric.
From this,
Let $$a = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}, b = 0, c = \dfrac{-\sqrt{7}}{3}$$.
$$(a, b)$$: $$3 \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3} - 0 + \sqrt{7} = 2\sqrt{7}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
$$(b, c)$$: $$0 - 3\cdot\dfrac{-\sqrt{7}}{3} + \sqrt{7} = \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = 2\sqrt{7}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
$$(a, c)$$: $$3\cdot\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3} - 3\cdot\dfrac{-\sqrt{7}}{3} + \sqrt{7} = \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = 3\sqrt{7}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
This particular case works, but let's try another: $$a = \dfrac{2\sqrt{7}}{3}, b = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}, c = 0$$.
$$(a, b)$$: $$2\sqrt{7} - \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = 2\sqrt{7}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
$$(b, c)$$: $$\sqrt{7} - 0 + \sqrt{7} = 2\sqrt{7}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
$$(a, c)$$: $$2\sqrt{7} - 0 + \sqrt{7} = 3\sqrt{7}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
Let me find a counterexample. Take $$b = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{6}$$, $$a = 0$$, $$c = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{3}$$:
$$(a,b)$$: $$0 - \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2} + \sqrt{7} = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
$$(b,c)$$: $$\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2} - \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = \dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2}$$ (irrational) $$\checkmark$$
$$(a,c)$$: $$0 - \sqrt{7} + \sqrt{7} = 0$$ (rational) $$\times$$
So $$R$$ is not transitive.
The correct answer is Option A: Reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Negation of $$(p \to q) \to (q \to p)$$ is
To find the negation of $$(p \to q) \to (q \to p)$$ we use the fact that the negation of $$A \to B$$ is $$A \wedge \neg B$$, and here $$A = (p \to q)$$ and $$B = (q \to p)$$, so the negation becomes $$(p \to q) \wedge \neg(q \to p)$$.
Since $$p \to q \equiv \neg p \vee q$$ and $$\neg(q \to p) = q \wedge \neg p$$, we get $$(\neg p \vee q) \wedge (q \wedge \neg p)$$. Because $$q \wedge \neg p$$ already implies $$\neg p \vee q$$, the expression simplifies to $$q \wedge (\sim p)$$.
Therefore, the negation of $$(p \to q) \to (q \to p)$$ is $$q \wedge (\sim p)$$.
The number of functions $$f : \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \to \{a \in \mathbb{Z} : |a| \leq 8\}$$ satisfying $$f(n) + \frac{1}{n}f(n+1) = 1$$, $$\forall n \in \{1, 2, 3\}$$ is
Given: $$f : \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \to \{a \in \mathbb{Z} : |a| \leq 8\}$$ satisfying $$f(n) + \frac{1}{n}f(n+1) = 1$$ for all $$n \in \{1, 2, 3\}$$.
From the recurrence relation, we express all values in terms of $$f(1)$$:
For $$n = 1$$: $$f(1) + f(2) = 1 \implies f(2) = 1 - f(1)$$
For $$n = 2$$: $$f(2) + \frac{1}{2}f(3) = 1 \implies f(3) = 2(1 - f(2)) = 2(1 - (1 - f(1))) = 2f(1)$$
For $$n = 3$$: $$f(3) + \frac{1}{3}f(4) = 1 \implies f(4) = 3(1 - f(3)) = 3(1 - 2f(1)) = 3 - 6f(1)$$
All function values must be integers with $$|f(i)| \leq 8$$. Since $$f(1)$$ is an integer, we need:
- $$|f(1)| \leq 8$$
- $$|1 - f(1)| \leq 8 \implies -7 \leq f(1) \leq 9$$
- $$|2f(1)| \leq 8 \implies -4 \leq f(1) \leq 4$$
- $$|3 - 6f(1)| \leq 8 \implies -\frac{5}{6} \leq f(1) \leq \frac{11}{6}$$
The most restrictive constraint gives $$f(1) \in \{0, 1\}$$ (integers in $$[-0.83, 1.83]$$).
The two valid functions are:
- $$f(1) = 0$$: $$f = (0, 1, 0, 3)$$
- $$f(1) = 1$$: $$f = (1, 0, 2, -3)$$
The number of such functions is 2.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option D: $$\mathbf{2}$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 3, 4, 6, 9\}$$ and $$B = \{2, 4, 5, 8, 10\}$$. Let $$R$$ be a relation defined on $$A \times B$$ such that $$R = \{(a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2): a_1 \leq b_2 \text{ and } b_1 \leq a_2\}$$. Then the number of elements in the set $$R$$ is
Let $$A = \{1, 3, 4, 6, 9\}$$ and $$B = \{2, 4, 5, 8, 10\}$$. The relation $$R$$ on $$A \times B$$ is defined as:
$$ R = \{((a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2)) : a_1 \leq b_2 \text{ and } b_1 \leq a_2\} $$
Elements of $$A \times B$$ are ordered pairs $$(a, b)$$ with $$a \in A, b \in B$$. The relation $$R$$ relates two such pairs $$((a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2))$$ when both conditions $$a_1 \leq b_2$$ and $$b_1 \leq a_2$$ hold.
Since $$a_1$$ and $$b_2$$ come from different pairs, and $$b_1$$ and $$a_2$$ come from different pairs, the two conditions are independent.
Count pairs $$(a_1, b_2)$$ with $$a_1 \in A, b_2 \in B, a_1 \leq b_2$$:
$$a_1 = 1$$: $$b_2 \in \{2,4,5,8,10\}$$ → 5 pairs
$$a_1 = 3$$: $$b_2 \in \{4,5,8,10\}$$ → 4 pairs
$$a_1 = 4$$: $$b_2 \in \{4,5,8,10\}$$ → 4 pairs
$$a_1 = 6$$: $$b_2 \in \{8,10\}$$ → 2 pairs
$$a_1 = 9$$: $$b_2 \in \{10\}$$ → 1 pair
Total: $$5 + 4 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 16$$
Count pairs $$(b_1, a_2)$$ with $$b_1 \in B, a_2 \in A, b_1 \leq a_2$$:
$$b_1 = 2$$: $$a_2 \in \{3,4,6,9\}$$ → 4 pairs
$$b_1 = 4$$: $$a_2 \in \{4,6,9\}$$ → 3 pairs
$$b_1 = 5$$: $$a_2 \in \{6,9\}$$ → 2 pairs
$$b_1 = 8$$: $$a_2 \in \{9\}$$ → 1 pair
$$b_1 = 10$$: $$a_2 \in \{\}$$ → 0 pairs
Total: $$4 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 0 = 10$$
$$ |R| = 16 \times 10 = 160 $$
The number of elements in $$R$$ is Option A: 160.
Let $$A = \{2, 3, 4\}$$ and $$B = \{8, 9, 12\}$$. Then the number of elements in the relation $$R = \{(a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2) \in A \times B, A \times B: a_1 \text{ divides } b_2 \text{ and } a_2 \text{ divides } b_1\}$$ is
$$R = \{((a_1,b_1),(a_2,b_2)) \in A \times B \times A \times B: a_1 | b_2 \text{ and } a_2 | b_1\}$$
For each pair $$(a_1, b_2)$$ where $$a_1 | b_2$$: A={2,3,4}, B={8,9,12}.
2|8✓, 2|9✗, 2|12✓, 3|8✗, 3|9✓, 3|12✓, 4|8✓, 4|9✗, 4|12✓
Count of $$(a_1,b_2)$$ with $$a_1|b_2$$: 6 pairs.
Similarly for $$(a_2,b_1)$$ with $$a_2|b_1$$: same 6 pairs.
Total elements = 6 × 6 = 36.
The correct answer is Option 1: 36.
Let $$f : R - \{0, 1\} \to R$$ be a function such that $$f(x) + f\left(\frac{1}{1-x}\right) = 1 + x$$. Then $$f(2)$$ is equal to:
$$f : \mathbb{R} - \{0, 1\} \to \mathbb{R}$$ such that $$f(x) + f\left(\frac{1}{1-x}\right) = 1 + x$$. Find $$f(2)$$.
Substituting $$x = 2$$ into the given equation yields $$f(2) + f\left(\frac{1}{1-2}\right) = 1 + 2$$, which simplifies to $$f(2) + f(-1) = 3 \quad (1)$$.
Next, letting $$x = -1$$ gives $$f(-1) + f\left(\frac{1}{1-(-1)}\right) = 1 + (-1)$$, so $$f(-1) + f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = 0 \quad (2)$$.
Finally, putting $$x = \frac{1}{2}$$ leads to $$f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) + f\left(\frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{2}}\right) = 1 + \frac{1}{2}$$, hence $$f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) + f(2) = \frac{3}{2} \quad (3)$$.
From (1) we have $$f(-1) = 3 - f(2)$$. Substituting into (2) gives $$(3 - f(2)) + f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = 0$$, so $$f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = f(2) - 3 \quad (4)$$. Substituting (4) into (3) yields $$(f(2) - 3) + f(2) = \frac{3}{2}$$, hence $$2f(2) = \frac{3}{2} + 3 = \frac{9}{2}$$ and therefore $$f(2) = \frac{9}{4}$$.
Answer: Option B $$\left(\frac{9}{4}\right)$$
Let the number of elements in sets $$A$$ and $$B$$ be five and two respectively. Then the number of subsets of $$A \times B$$ each having at least 3 and at most 6 elements is
To solve this, we use the property of Cartesian products and combinations.
1. Find the total elements in $$A \times B$$
The number of elements in the Cartesian product $$A \times B$$ is:
$$n(A \times B) = n(A) \times n(B) = 5 \times 2 = 10$$
2. Set up the Combination Sum
We need the number of subsets having "at least 3 and at most 6" elements. This is the sum of choosing 3, 4, 5, and 6 elements out of 10:
$$\text{Number of subsets} = ^{10}C_3 + ^{10}C_4 + ^{10}C_5 + ^{10}C_6$$
3. Calculate each term
- $$^{10}C_3 = \frac{10 \times 9 \times 8}{3 \times 2 \times 1} = 120$$
- $$^{10}C_4 = \frac{10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7}{4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1} = 210$$
- $$^{10}C_5 = \frac{10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 6}{5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1} = 252$$
- $$^{10}C_6 = ^{10}C_4 = 210$$
4. Final Result
$$\text{Sum} = 120 + 210 + 252 + 210 = \mathbf{792}$$
The domain of $$f(x) = \frac{\log_{(x+1)}(x-2)}{e^{2\log_e x^2 - (2x+3)}}$$, $$x \in R$$ is
The negation of $$(p \wedge (-q)) \vee (-p)$$ is equivalent to
We need to find the negation of $$(p \wedge (\neg q)) \vee (\neg p)$$.
Simplify the given expression.
Using the distributive law, we expand:
$$(p \wedge (\neg q)) \vee (\neg p) = (\neg p \vee p) \wedge (\neg p \vee \neg q)$$
Since $$\neg p \vee p$$ is a tautology (always true):
$$= T \wedge (\neg p \vee \neg q) = \neg p \vee \neg q$$
Apply De Morgan's Law.
By De Morgan's Law, $$\neg p \vee \neg q = \neg(p \wedge q)$$. So:
$$(p \wedge (\neg q)) \vee (\neg p) \equiv \neg(p \wedge q)$$
Find the negation.
The negation of $$\neg(p \wedge q)$$ is:
$$\neg[\neg(p \wedge q)] = p \wedge q$$
Verification using truth table:
When $$p = T, q = T$$: Original = $$(T \wedge F) \vee F = F$$. Negation = $$T$$. And $$p \wedge q = T$$. ✔
When $$p = T, q = F$$: Original = $$(T \wedge T) \vee F = T$$. Negation = $$F$$. And $$p \wedge q = F$$. ✔
When $$p = F, q = T$$: Original = $$(F \wedge F) \vee T = T$$. Negation = $$F$$. And $$p \wedge q = F$$. ✔
When $$p = F, q = F$$: Original = $$(F \wedge T) \vee T = T$$. Negation = $$F$$. And $$p \wedge q = F$$. ✔
The negation matches $$p \wedge q$$ in all cases.
The answer is Option B: $$p \wedge q$$.
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \dfrac{x}{1 + x^2}$$, where $$x$$ is greatest integer $$\le x$$, is $$[2, 6)$$, then its range is
The function is $$f(x) = \dfrac{[x]}{1 + x^2}$$, where $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$, and the domain is $$[2, 6)$$. We evaluate $$f$$ on each unit interval where $$[x]$$ is constant.
On $$[2, 3)$$: $$[x] = 2$$, so $$f(x) = \dfrac{2}{1+x^2}$$. Since $$1+x^2$$ increases from $$5$$ to $$10$$, $$f$$ decreases from $$\tfrac{2}{5}$$ to just above $$\tfrac{2}{10} = \tfrac{1}{5}$$. On $$[3, 4)$$: $$f(x) = \dfrac{3}{1+x^2}$$, ranging from $$\tfrac{3}{10}$$ down to just above $$\tfrac{3}{17}$$. On $$[4, 5)$$: $$f(x) = \dfrac{4}{1+x^2}$$, from $$\tfrac{4}{17}$$ to just above $$\tfrac{4}{26} = \tfrac{2}{13}$$. On $$[5, 6)$$: $$f(x) = \dfrac{5}{1+x^2}$$, from $$\tfrac{5}{26}$$ to just above $$\tfrac{5}{37}$$.
Combining all intervals, the minimum value approaches $$\tfrac{5}{37}$$ (from above) and the maximum value is $$\tfrac{2}{5}$$ (attained at $$x = 2$$). The range is $$\left(\dfrac{5}{37},\;\dfrac{2}{5}\right]$$, which matches $$\boxed{\left\{\dfrac{5}{37},\;\dfrac{2}{5}\right\}}$$, i.e., option (D).
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \log_e(4x^2 + 11x + 6) + \sin^{-1}(4x + 3) + \cos^{-1}\left(\frac{10x + 6}{3}\right)$$ is $$(\alpha, \beta]$$, then $$36|\alpha + \beta|$$ is equal to
Find the domain of $$f(x) = \ln(4x^2+11x+6) + \sin^{-1}(4x+3) + \cos^{-1}\left(\dfrac{10x+6}{3}\right)$$, then compute $$36|\alpha+\beta|$$.
Domain constraints.
(i) $$4x^2+11x+6 > 0$$: Factor: $$(4x+3)(x+2) > 0$$. Solutions: $$x < -2$$ or $$x > -\dfrac{3}{4}$$.
(ii) $$-1 \leq 4x+3 \leq 1$$: $$-4 \leq 4x \leq -2$$, so $$-1 \leq x \leq -\dfrac{1}{2}$$.
(iii) $$-1 \leq \dfrac{10x+6}{3} \leq 1$$: $$-3 \leq 10x+6 \leq 3$$, so $$-\dfrac{9}{10} \leq x \leq -\dfrac{3}{10}$$.
From (ii): $$[-1, -1/2]$$
From (iii): $$[-9/10, -3/10]$$
Intersection of (ii) and (iii): $$[-9/10, -1/2]$$
Now intersect with (i): $$x < -2$$ or $$x > -3/4$$.
$$[-9/10, -1/2]$$ intersected with ($$x < -2$$ or $$x > -3/4$$):
$$-9/10 = -0.9$$ and $$-3/4 = -0.75$$. So $$x > -3/4$$ intersected with $$[-9/10, -1/2]$$ gives $$(-3/4, -1/2]$$.
Also check $$x < -2$$: no overlap with $$[-9/10, -1/2]$$.
So domain = $$(-3/4, -1/2] = (\alpha, \beta]$$.
$$\alpha = -3/4, \beta = -1/2$$
$$\alpha + \beta = -3/4 + (-1/2) = -5/4$$
$$36|\alpha + \beta| = 36 \times 5/4 = 45$$
The correct answer is Option D: 45.
Let $$D$$ be the domain of the function $$f(x) = \sin^{-1}\left(\log_{3x}\left(\frac{6 + 2\log_{3}x}{-5x}\right)\right)$$. If the range of the function $$g : D \to \mathbb{R}$$ defined by $$g(x) = x - [x]$$, ($$[x]$$ is the greatest integer function), is $$(\alpha, \beta)$$, then $$\alpha^2 + \frac{5}{\beta}$$ is equal to
Let $$f : R \to R$$ be a function such that $$f(x) = \frac{x^2+2x+1}{x^2+1}$$. Then
Let the sets $$A$$ and $$B$$ denote the domain and range respectively of the function $$f(x) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{[x] - x}}$$, where $$[x]$$ denotes the smallest integer greater than or equal to $$x$$. Then among the statements
(S1): $$A \cap B = (1, \infty) - \mathbb{N}$$ and
(S2): $$A \cup B = (1, \infty)$$
Given: $$f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\lceil x \rceil - x}}$$ where $$\lceil x \rceil$$ denotes the smallest integer greater than or equal to $$x$$ (ceiling function).
Domain $$A$$: We need $$\lceil x \rceil - x > 0$$, which holds for all non-integer $$x$$.
For integer $$x$$: $$\lceil x \rceil = x$$, so $$\lceil x \rceil - x = 0$$. Not in domain.
$$A = \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Z}$$
Range $$B$$: For non-integer $$x$$ with $$\lfloor x \rfloor = n$$, the fractional part $$\{x\} \in (0, 1)$$, and $$\lceil x \rceil - x = 1 - \{x\}$$.
As $$\{x\}$$ ranges over $$(0, 1)$$: $$1 - \{x\} \in (0, 1)$$, so $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \{x\}}} \in (1, \infty)$$.
$$B = (1, \infty)$$
Checking (S1): $$A \cap B = (\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Z}) \cap (1, \infty) = (1, \infty) \setminus \{2, 3, 4, \ldots\} = (1, \infty) \setminus \mathbb{N}$$.
The statement says $$A \cap B = (1, \infty) - \mathbb{N}$$. This is correct since $$\mathbb{N} \cap (1, \infty) = \{2, 3, 4, \ldots\}$$. (S1) is TRUE.
Checking (S2): $$A \cup B = (\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Z}) \cup (1, \infty)$$.
This union contains non-integers less than or equal to 1 (like $$0.5$$, $$-0.5$$, etc.), so $$A \cup B \neq (1, \infty)$$.
For example, $$0.5 \in A$$ but $$0.5 \notin (1, \infty)$$. (S2) is FALSE.
Only (S1) is true.
The correct answer is Option B.
The equation $$x^2 - 4x + [x] + 3 = x[x]$$, where $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer function, has:
We need to solve $$x^2 - 4x + [x] + 3 = x[x]$$, where $$[x]$$ is the greatest integer function.
We start by rearranging the equation.
$$(x^2 - 4x + 3) = x[x] - [x] = [x](x - 1)$$
$$(x - 1)(x - 3) = [x](x - 1)$$
Next, we analyze cases based on the factor $$(x - 1)$$.
Case 1: $$x = 1$$.
The left-hand side becomes 0 and the right-hand side is $$[1](1 - 1) = 0$$, so $$x = 1$$ is a solution.
Case 2: $$x \neq 1$$.
Dividing both sides of $$(x - 1)(x - 3) = [x](x - 1)$$ by $$(x - 1)$$ gives
$$x - 3 = [x]$$
Since $$[x]$$ is an integer, $$x - 3$$ must be an integer, implying $$x$$ is an integer.
If $$x$$ is an integer, then $$[x] = x$$, so the equation becomes $$x - 3 = x$$, which leads to $$-3 = 0$$, a contradiction.
Alternatively, if $$x$$ were not an integer but $$x - 3$$ were an integer, then $$x$$ would be an integer, which is also a contradiction. Hence no solutions arise for $$x \neq 1$$.
Therefore, the only solution to the equation is $$x = 1$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 4, indicating a unique solution in $$(-\infty, \infty)$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7\}$$. Then the relation $$R = \{(x, y) \in A \times A : x + y = 7\}$$ is
$$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7\}$$ and $$R = \{(x, y) \in A \times A : x + y = 7\}$$
The pairs in $$R$$ are: $$(1,6), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,2), (6,1)$$
Reflexive? For reflexivity, $$(a, a) \in R$$ for all $$a \in A$$. This requires $$a + a = 7$$, i.e., $$2a = 7$$, giving $$a = 3.5 \notin A$$. So $$(1,1), (2,2), \ldots$$ are not in $$R$$. Not reflexive.
Symmetric? If $$(x, y) \in R$$, then $$x + y = 7$$, which means $$y + x = 7$$, so $$(y, x) \in R$$. We can verify: $$(1,6) \in R$$ and $$(6,1) \in R$$, $$(2,5) \in R$$ and $$(5,2) \in R$$, etc. Symmetric.
Transitive? If $$(x, y) \in R$$ and $$(y, z) \in R$$, then $$x + y = 7$$ and $$y + z = 7$$, so $$x = 7 - y$$ and $$z = 7 - y$$, giving $$x = z$$. For transitivity we need $$(x, z) = (x, x) \in R$$, which requires $$2x = 7$$. Since $$x$$ is an integer, this is impossible. For example, $$(1,6) \in R$$ and $$(6,1) \in R$$, but $$(1,1) \notin R$$. Not transitive.
Therefore, $$R$$ is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive, which is Option B.
Let $$A = \left\{x \in \mathbb{R}: |x+3| + |x+4| \le 3\right\}$$, $$B = \left\{x \in \mathbb{R}: 3^x \sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{3^{x-3}}{10^r} < 3^{-3x}\right\}$$, where $$[t]$$ denotes greatest integer function. Then,
To solve for sets A and B, we will break them down individually and then determine their relationship.
The set is defined as $$A\ =\ \left\{x\in\ R\ :\ \left|x+3\right|+\left|x+4\right|\le3\right\}$$
We evaluate this absolute value inequality by checking three critical regions determined by the roots x = -4 and x = -3.
Case 1: x < -4
Both terms inside the absolute values are negative:
$$-(x + 3) - (x + 4) \le 3 \implies -2x - 7 \le 3 \implies -2x \le 10 \implies x \ge -5$$
In this region, the solution is [-5, -4).
Case 2: -4 <= x <= -3
The first term is negative, the second is positive:
$$-(x + 3) + (x + 4) \le 3 \implies 1 \le 3$$
This is always true. So, the entire interval [-4, -3] is included.
Case 3: x > -3
Both terms are positive:
$$(x + 3) + (x + 4) \le 3 \implies 2x + 7 \le 3 \implies 2x \le -4 \implies x \le -2$$
In this region, the solution is (-3, -2].
Combining the cases:
$$A = [-5, -2]$$
Now Solve for Set(B):
The set is defined as
First, let's simplify the summation. It is an infinite geometric series with first term $$a\ =\ \frac{3^{x-3}}{10}$$ and common ratio $$q\ =\ \frac{1}{10}$$:
$$\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \frac{3^{x-3}}{10^r} = 3^{x-3} \left( \frac{1/10}{1 - 1/10} \right) = 3^{x-3} \left( \frac{1/10}{9/10} \right) = \frac{3^{x-3}}{9} = \frac{3^{x-3}}{3^2} = 3^{x-5}$$
Now, substitute this back into the inequality:
$$3^x.3^{x-5}<3^{-3x}$$
Since the base 3 > 1, we can compare the exponents directly:
$$3^{2x-5}<3^{-3x}$$
So, B = (-$$\infty\ $$, 1).
So Finally,
We have:
- $A = [-5, -2]
- $B = (-$$\infty\ $$, 1)
Checking the relationship between the two sets:
Since every value in [-5, -2] is strictly less than 1, all elements of A are contained within B.
Final Result:
$$A \subset B$$
$$B\ =\ \left\{x\ \in\ R\ :\ 3^x\Sigma\ \frac{3^{x-3}}{10^r}<3^{-3x}\right\}$$
If $$f(x) = \frac{2^{2x}}{2^{2x}+2}$$, $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$, then $$f\left(\frac{1}{2023}\right) + f\left(\frac{2}{2023}\right) + f\left(\frac{3}{2023}\right) + \ldots + f\left(\frac{2022}{2023}\right)$$ is equal to
We need to evaluate $$f\left(\frac{1}{2023}\right) + f\left(\frac{2}{2023}\right) + \cdots + f\left(\frac{2022}{2023}\right)$$ where $$f(x) = \dfrac{2^{2x}}{2^{2x} + 2} = \dfrac{4^x}{4^x + 2}$$.
First, observe that for any $$x$$ we have
$$f(1 - x) = \dfrac{4^{1 - x}}{4^{1 - x} + 2} = \dfrac{\frac{4}{4^x}}{\frac{4}{4^x} + 2} = \dfrac{4}{4 + 2 \cdot 4^x} = \dfrac{2}{2 + 4^x}$$
and therefore
$$f(x) + f(1 - x) = \dfrac{4^x}{4^x + 2} + \dfrac{2}{4^x + 2} = \dfrac{4^x + 2}{4^x + 2} = 1.$$
Next, pair each term $$f\left(\frac{k}{2023}\right)$$ with $$f\left(\frac{2023 - k}{2023}\right) = f\bigl(1 - \tfrac{k}{2023}\bigr)$$ for $$k = 1,2,\dots,2022$$. Each pair sums to 1:
$$f\left(\frac{k}{2023}\right) + f\left(\frac{2023 - k}{2023}\right) = 1.$$
Since the pairs $$(k,\,2023 - k)$$ cover all values from 1 to 2022 without overlap, there are exactly 1011 such pairs. Hence the total sum is
$$1011 \times 1 = 1011.$$
The correct answer is Option D: 1011.
The domain of the function $$f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{[x]^2 - 3[x] - 10}}$$ is (where $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$)
Let $$f(x)$$ be a function such that $$f(x + y) = f(x) \cdot f(y)$$ for all $$x, y \in \mathbb{N}$$. If $$f(1) = 3$$ and $$\sum_{k=1}^{n} f(k) = 3279$$, then the value of $$n$$ is
We are given the functional equation $$f(x + y) = f(x) \cdot f(y)$$ for all $$x, y \in \mathbb{N}$$, along with $$f(1) = 3$$ and the condition $$\sum_{k=1}^{n} f(k) = 3279\;.$$
By setting $$y = 1$$ in the functional equation, we obtain $$f(x + 1) = f(x)\cdot f(1) = 3f(x)\;. $$ An inductive argument then shows that $$f(n) = 3^n$$ for every natural number $$n\;.$$
Substituting $$f(k)=3^k$$ into the given sum, we get
$$\sum_{k=1}^{n}3^k = 3 + 3^2 + 3^3 + \cdots + 3^n = \frac{3(3^n - 1)}{3 - 1} = \frac{3(3^n - 1)}{2}\;.$$
We set this equal to 3279 and solve:
$$\frac{3(3^n - 1)}{2} = 3279$$
$$3(3^n - 1) = 6558$$
$$3^n - 1 = 2186$$
$$3^n = 2187 = 3^7$$
$$n = 7\;.$$
Therefore, the value of $$n$$ is 7.
The minimum number of elements that must be added to relation $$R = \{(a,b), (b,c), (b,d)\}$$ on the set $$\{a, b, c, d\}$$, so that it is an equivalence relation is
We need to find the minimum number of elements that must be added to $$R = \{(a,b), (b,c), (b,d)\}$$ on the set $$\{a, b, c, d\}$$ to make it an equivalence relation. An equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
First, for reflexivity we need $$(a,a), (b,b), (c,c), (d,d)$$. None of these are in $$R$$, so we must add 4 elements.
Next, for symmetry each pair $$(x,y)$$ in $$R$$ requires the pair $$(y,x)$$. Since $$(a,b)\in R$$ we need $$(b,a)$$, since $$(b,c)\in R$$ we need $$(c,b)$$, and since $$(b,d)\in R$$ we need $$(d,b)$$. This adds 3 elements.
After adding these, the relation becomes $$\{(a,a),(b,b),(c,c),(d,d),(a,b),(b,a),(b,c),(c,b),(b,d),(d,b)\}$$. To ensure transitivity we check pairs with a common middle element: from $$(a,b)$$ and $$(b,c)$$ we need $$(a,c)$$, from $$(a,b)$$ and $$(b,d)$$ we need $$(a,d)$$, from $$(c,b)$$ and $$(b,a)$$ we need $$(c,a)$$, from $$(c,b)$$ and $$(b,d)$$ we need $$(c,d)$$, from $$(d,b)$$ and $$(b,a)$$ we need $$(d,a)$$, and from $$(d,b)$$ and $$(b,c)$$ we need $$(d,c)$$. This requires 6 more elements.
The resulting relation then has 16 elements and includes every ordered pair among $$\{a,b,c,d\}$$, making it an equivalence relation. In total we add $$4 + 3 + 6 = \boxed{13}$$ elements.
Let $$R = \{a, b, c, d, e\}$$ and $$S = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$. Total number of onto functions $$f : R \to S$$ such that $$f(a) \neq 1$$, is equal to _____.
Total onto functions from $$R = \{a,b,c,d,e\}$$ to $$S = \{1,2,3,4\}$$:
Using inclusion-exclusion: $$4^5 - \binom{4}{1} \cdot 3^5 + \binom{4}{2} \cdot 2^5 - \binom{4}{3} \cdot 1^5$$
$$= 1024 - 4(243) + 6(32) - 4(1) = 1024 - 972 + 192 - 4 = 240$$
Now subtract onto functions where $$f(a) = 1$$. When $$f(a) = 1$$, we need $$f : \{b,c,d,e\} \to \{1,2,3,4\}$$ to be onto (since every element of $$S$$ must be hit).
But wait — element 1 is already hit by $$f(a) = 1$$. So $$\{b,c,d,e\}$$ must cover $$\{2,3,4\}$$ (all of them), and may also map to 1.
Number of such functions = total functions from 4 elements to 4 elements that cover $$\{2,3,4\}$$:
$$= 4^4 - \binom{3}{1} \cdot 3^4 + \binom{3}{2} \cdot 2^4 - \binom{3}{3} \cdot 1^4$$
$$= 256 - 3(81) + 3(16) - 1 = 256 - 243 + 48 - 1 = 60$$
Onto functions with $$f(a) \neq 1$$ = $$240 - 60 = 180$$
For some $$a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}$$, let $$f(x) = ax - 3$$ and $$g(x) = x^b + c$$, $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$. If $$(f \circ g)^{-1}(x) = \left(\frac{x-7}{2}\right)^{1/3}$$, then $$(f \circ g)(ac) + (g \circ f)(b)$$ is equal to _____.
Given $$f(x) = ax - 3$$, $$g(x) = x^b + c$$ with $$a, b, c \in \mathbb{N}$$, and $$(f \circ g)^{-1}(x) = \left(\dfrac{x-7}{2}\right)^{1/3}$$.
Finding $$a, b, c$$:
$$f(g(x)) = a(x^b + c) - 3 = ax^b + ac - 3$$
If $$(f \circ g)^{-1}(x) = \left(\frac{x-7}{2}\right)^{1/3}$$, then:
$$f \circ g(x) = 2x^3 + 7$$
Comparing coefficients: $$a = 2$$, $$b = 3$$, $$ac - 3 = 7 \implies c = 5$$.
Computing $$(f \circ g)(ac)$$:
$$ac = 2 \times 5 = 10$$
$$(f \circ g)(10) = 2(10)^3 + 7 = 2000 + 7 = 2007$$
Computing $$(g \circ f)(b)$$:
$$f(3) = 2(3) - 3 = 3$$
$$g(3) = 3^3 + 5 = 32$$
Final answer:
$$(f \circ g)(ac) + (g \circ f)(b) = 2007 + 32 = 2039$$
The answer is $$2039$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$$ and $$B = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$$. Then the number of functions $$f: A \to B$$ satisfying $$f(1) + f(2) = f(4) - 1$$ is equal to _______
Let $$A = \{1,2,3,4,5\}$$, $$B = \{1,2,3,4,5,6\}$$. Find the number of functions $$f: A \to B$$ with $$f(1) + f(2) = f(4) - 1$$.
We need $$f(1) + f(2) = f(4) - 1$$, where $$f(1), f(2), f(4) \in \{1,2,3,4,5,6\}$$.
Let $$f(4) = k$$, so $$f(1) + f(2) = k - 1$$.
Since $$f(1), f(2) \geq 1$$, we need $$k - 1 \geq 2$$, i.e., $$k \geq 3$$.
Since $$f(1), f(2) \leq 6$$, we need $$k - 1 \leq 12$$, always satisfied.
$$k = 3$$: $$f(1) + f(2) = 2$$. Only $$(1,1)$$ → 1 pair
$$k = 4$$: $$f(1) + f(2) = 3$$. Pairs: $$(1,2), (2,1)$$ → 2 pairs
$$k = 5$$: $$f(1) + f(2) = 4$$. Pairs: $$(1,3), (2,2), (3,1)$$ → 3 pairs
$$k = 6$$: $$f(1) + f(2) = 5$$. Pairs: $$(1,4), (2,3), (3,2), (4,1)$$ → 4 pairs
Total constrained combinations: $$1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10$$
$$f(3)$$ and $$f(5)$$ are unconstrained, each with 6 choices.
Free choices: $$6 \times 6 = 36$$
$$ \text{Total} = 10 \times 36 = 360 $$
The number of functions is 360.
The number of relations, on the set $$\{1, 2, 3\}$$ containing $$(1, 2)$$ and $$(2, 3)$$ which are reflexive and transitive but not symmetric, is _____.
We start with the set $$S=\{1,2,3\}$$ and require a relation that contains $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$, is reflexive and transitive, but fails to be symmetric.
Reflexivity forces the relation to include $$(1,1)$$, $$(2,2)$$, and $$(3,3)$$.
Since $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$ must be present, transitivity then requires $$(1,3)$$, so the mandatory core of the relation is $$\{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,3),(1,3)\}\;.$$
To violate symmetry, at least one of the reverse pairs $$(2,1)$$, $$(3,2)$$, $$(3,1)$$ must be missing while its forward counterpart is present.
Thus the optional pairs are $$(2,1),(3,1),(3,2)$$, each of which may be included or excluded provided transitivity is preserved and the relation remains non-symmetric. We now check all choices.
When none of the optional pairs is added, the relation is exactly the mandatory set. It is not symmetric because $$(1,2)$$ is in the relation but $$(2,1)$$ is not, and one checks that all transitivity conditions hold. Hence this choice is valid.
When only $$(2,1)$$ is added, one verifies that $$(2,1)$$ and $$(1,2)$$ yield $$(2,2)$$, that $$(2,1)$$ and $$(1,3)$$ yield $$(2,3)$$, and that $$(1,2)$$ and $$(2,1)$$ yield $$(1,1)$$, all of which are already in the relation. Since $$(2,3)$$ is present without $$(3,2)$$, the relation remains non-symmetric. Thus this choice is valid.
When only $$(3,1)$$ is added, transitivity with $$(3,1)$$ and $$(1,2)$$ would force $$(3,2)$$, which is not included, so this choice fails.
When only $$(3,2)$$ is added, one checks that $$(3,2)$$ and $$(2,3)$$ give $$(3,3)$$, that $$(3,2)$$ and $$(2,2)$$ give $$(3,2)$$, and that $$(1,3)$$ and $$(3,2)$$ give $$(1,2)$$, all of which already lie in the relation. Because $$(1,2)$$ appears without $$(2,1)$$, the relation remains non-symmetric, so this choice is valid.
Adding exactly $$(2,1)$$ and $$(3,1)$$ would force $$(3,2)$$ for transitivity (via $$(3,1)$$ and $$(1,2)$$), reducing to the case where all three optional pairs are present.
Adding exactly $$(2,1)$$ and $$(3,2)$$ forces $$(3,1)$$ (via $$(3,2)$$ and $$(2,1)$$), again yielding all three optional pairs.
When all three optional pairs $$(2,1),(3,1),(3,2)$$ are included, the relation becomes $$S\times S$$, which is symmetric and thus invalid.
Finally, adding exactly $$(3,1)$$ and $$(3,2)$$ satisfies transitivity without further additions and leaves $$(1,2)$$ unmatched by $$(2,1)$$, so the relation is non-symmetric and valid.
Altogether there are four valid choices (none of the optional pairs; only $$(2,1)$$; only $$(3,2)$$; or exactly $$(3,1)$$ and $$(3,2)$$), so the answer is \boxed{4}.
Let $$A = \{0, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10\}$$ and $$R$$ be the relation defined on $$A$$ such that $$R\{(x,y) \in A \times A: x-y$$ is odd positive integer or $$x-y = 2\}$$. The minimum number of elements that must be added to the relation $$R$$, so that it is a symmetric relation, is equal to ______.
To solve this as written, we must find every pair $$(x, y)$$ that satisfies the given rules and then count how many "reverse" pairs $$(y, x)$$ are missing.
The set is $$A = \{0, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10\}$$.
Condition A: $$x - y = 2$$
Comparing all elements where the difference is exactly 2:
- $$(6, 4)$$
- $$(8, 6)$$
- $$(9, 7)$$
- $$(10, 8)$$
- From 3: $$(3, 0)$$
- From 4: $$(4, 3)$$
- From 6: $$(6, 3)$$
- From 7: $$(7, 0), (7, 4), (7, 6)$$
- From 8: $$(8, 3), (8, 7)$$
- From 9: $$(9, 0), (9, 4), (9, 6), (9, 8)$$
- From 10: $$(10, 3), (10, 7), (10, 9)$$
- A negative number can never be a "positive odd integer."
- A negative number can never equal $$2$$.
(Total: 4 pairs)
Condition B: $$x - y$$ is an odd positive integer
We look for $$x > y$$ where the result is $$1, 3, 5, 7, 9...$$:
(Total: 15 pairs)
For $$R$$ to be symmetric, if $$(x, y) \in R$$, then $$(y, x)$$ must be in $$R$$.
In the current relation, $$x$$ is always greater than $$y$$ ($$x - y = 2$$ or $$x - y = \text{positive odd}$$). Therefore, in every existing pair, $$x > y$$.
For any reverse pair $$(y, x)$$, the difference $$y - x$$ would be negative.
This means none of the reverse pairs are currently in $$R$$.
Total elements in $$R = 4 \text{ (from Cond A)} + 15 \text{ (from Cond B)} = 19$$.
To make it symmetric, you must add the reverse of every element.
Mathematically, the number to add is 19.
Let $$A = 1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots, 10$$ and $$B = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4$$. The number of elements in the relation $$R = \{(a, b) \in A \times A: 2a - b^2 + 3a - b \in B\}$$ is ________.
We have $$A = \{1,2,3,\dots,10\}$$, $$B = \{0,1,2,3,4\}$$, and we seek the number of ordered pairs $$(a,b)\in A\times A$$ satisfying $$2(a-b)^2 + 3(a-b)\in B\,. $$ To analyze this, set $$d = a - b$$ and define $$f(d) = 2d^2 + 3d\,. $$ We look for integer values of $$d$$ such that $$f(d)\in B\,. $$
When $$d = 0\,,\;f(0) = 0\in B$$, which accounts for the 10 diagonal pairs $$(a,a)\,,\;a=1,2,\dots,10\,. $$ For $$d = 1\,,\;f(1) = 5\notin B$$, and for $$d = -1\,,\;f(-1) = 2 - 3 = -1\notin B\,. $$ When $$d = 2\,,\;f(2) = 8 + 6 = 14\notin B$$, but for $$d = -2\,,\;f(-2) = 8 - 6 = 2\in B$$. The condition $$a - b = -2$$ gives $$b = a + 2$$, yielding the pairs $$(1,3), (2,4), \dots, (8,10)$$, which are 8 in number. All other values of $$d$$ produce $$f(d)$$ outside of $$B\,. $$
In total there are $$10 + 8 = 18$$ ordered pairs satisfying the condition. The answer is 18.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ and $$R$$ be a relation on the set $$A \times A$$ defined by $$R = \{((a, b), (c, d)) : 2a + 3b = 4c + 5d\}$$. Then the number of elements in $$R$$ is _____.
We are given $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ and a relation $$R$$ on $$A \times A$$ defined by:
$$R = \{((a, b), (c, d)) : 2a + 3b = 4c + 5d\}$$ where $$a, b, c, d \in A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$. We seek all ordered pairs $$((a,b), (c,d))$$ satisfying $$2a + 3b = 4c + 5d$$.
For the left side $$2a + 3b$$ the minimum is $$2(1) + 3(1) = 5$$ and the maximum is $$2(4) + 3(4) = 20$$. For the right side $$4c + 5d$$ the minimum is $$4(1) + 5(1) = 9$$ and the maximum is $$4(4) + 5(4) = 36$$. Thus the common range where both sides can be equal is $$[9, 20]$$.
Listing all values of $$2a + 3b$$ for each $$(a, b)$$ pair yields:
a=1: b=1 → 5, b=2 → 8, b=3 → 11, b=4 → 14
a=2: b=1 → 7, b=2 → 10, b=3 → 13, b=4 → 16
a=3: b=1 → 9, b=2 → 12, b=3 → 15, b=4 → 18
a=4: b=1 → 11, b=2 → 14, b=3 → 17, b=4 → 20.
Similarly, listing all values of $$4c + 5d$$ for each $$(c, d)$$ pair and keeping only those in $$[9, 20]$$ gives:
c=1: d=1 → 9, d=2 → 14, d=3 → 19, d=4 → 24 (out of range)
c=2: d=1 → 13, d=2 → 18, d=3 → 23 (out), d=4 → 28 (out)
c=3: d=1 → 17, d=2 → 27 (out)
c=4: d=1 → 21 (out), all others out
Valid RHS values are 9 from $$(1,1)$$, 13 from $$(2,1)$$, 14 from $$(1,2)$$, 17 from $$(3,1)$$, 18 from $$(2,2)$$, 19 from $$(1,3)$$.
Matching LHS and RHS values and counting pairs yields:
Value = 9: LHS pairs with $$2a+3b=9$$: $$(a,b) = (3,1)$$ (1 pair); RHS pairs: $$(c,d) = (1,1)$$ (1 pair); number of elements: $$1 \times 1 = 1$$.
Value = 13: LHS pairs with $$2a+3b=13$$: $$(a,b) = (2,3)$$ (1 pair); RHS pairs: $$(c,d) = (2,1)$$ (1 pair); number of elements: $$1 \times 1 = 1$$.
Value = 14: LHS pairs with $$2a+3b=14$$: $$(a,b) = (1,4)$$ and $$(4,2)$$ (2 pairs); RHS pairs: $$(c,d) = (1,2)$$ (1 pair); number of elements: $$2 \times 1 = 2$$.
Value = 17: LHS pairs with $$2a+3b=17$$: $$(a,b) = (4,3)$$ (1 pair); RHS pairs: $$(c,d) = (3,1)$$ (1 pair); number of elements: $$1 \times 1 = 1$$.
Value = 18: LHS pairs with $$2a+3b=18$$: $$(a,b) = (3,4)$$ (1 pair); RHS pairs: $$(c,d) = (2,2)$$ (1 pair); number of elements: $$1 \times 1 = 1$$.
Value = 19: LHS pairs with $$2a+3b=19$$: no pair gives 19; number of elements: 0.
Adding these counts gives 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 6.
The number of elements in $$R$$ is 6.
Let $$f^1(x) = \frac{3x+2}{2x+3}$$, $$x \in R - \{-\frac{3}{2}\}$$. For $$n \geq 2$$, define $$f^n x = f^1 \circ f^{n-1}(x)$$. If $$f^5 x = \frac{ax+b}{bx+a}$$, $$\gcd(a,b) = 1$$, then $$a + b$$ is equal to ______.
The number of ordered triplets of the truth values of $$p, q$$ and $$r$$ such that the truth value of the statement $$p \vee q \wedge p \vee r \Rightarrow q \vee r$$ is True, is equal to _______
We need to find the number of ordered triplets $$(p, q, r)$$ of truth values such that $$p \vee (q \wedge (p \vee r)) \Rightarrow (q \vee r)$$ is True.
An implication $$A \Rightarrow B$$ is False only when $$A$$ is True and $$B$$ is False.
When is the consequent False?
$$q \vee r = F$$ requires $$q = F$$ and $$r = F$$.
With $$q = F, r = F$$, evaluate the antecedent:
$$p \vee (F \wedge (p \vee F)) = p \vee (F \wedge p) = p \vee F = p$$
So the implication is False only when $$p = T, q = F, r = F$$.
Total possible triplets = $$2^3 = 8$$. Number where implication is False = 1.
Number where implication is True = $$8 - 1 = 7$$.
The product of all positive real values of $$x$$ satisfying the equation $$x^{(16(\log_5 x)^3 - 68\log_5 x)} = 5^{-16}$$ is _______.
Let $$y = \log_5 x$$. Then $$x = 5^{y}$$ (because logarithm base 5 is the inverse of the exponential base 5).
Rewrite the given equation using $$y$$:
$$x^{\bigl(16(\log_5 x)^3 - 68\log_5 x\bigr)} = 5^{-16}$$ becomes
$$(5^{y})^{\,16y^{3} \;-\; 68y} = 5^{-16}.$$
Using the law $$\bigl(a^{m}\bigr)^{n}=a^{mn}$$, the left side simplifies to
$$5^{\,y\,(16y^{3} - 68y)} = 5^{\,16y^{4} - 68y^{2}}.$$
Because the bases are equal (both are 5), equate the exponents:
$$16y^{4} - 68y^{2} = -16.$$
Divide every term by 2 to make the numbers smaller:
$$8y^{4} - 34y^{2} + 8 = 0 \qquad -(1)$$
Put $$z = y^{2} \;(\text{note: } z \ge 0)$$ to convert the quartic to a quadratic:
Equation $$(1)$$ becomes
$$8z^{2} - 34z + 8 = 0.$$
Solve this quadratic using the quadratic formula $$z = \dfrac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}$$ with $$a=8,\, b=-34,\, c=8$$:
Discriminant $$\Delta = (-34)^{2} - 4\cdot 8 \cdot 8 = 1156 - 256 = 900.$$
$$\sqrt{\Delta} = 30.$$
Therefore
$$z = \dfrac{34 \pm 30}{16}.$$
Case 1: $$z = \dfrac{34 + 30}{16} = \dfrac{64}{16} = 4.$$
Case 2: $$z = \dfrac{34 - 30}{16} = \dfrac{4}{16} = \dfrac14.$$
Recall $$z = y^{2}$$, so
From Case 1: $$y^{2}=4 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad y = \pm 2.$$
From Case 2: $$y^{2}=\dfrac14 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad y = \pm \dfrac12.$$
Convert back to $$x$$ using $$x = 5^{y}$$:
For $$y = 2: \; x = 5^{2} = 25.$$
For $$y = -2: \; x = 5^{-2} = \dfrac1{25}.$$
For $$y = \dfrac12: \; x = 5^{1/2} = \sqrt{5}.$$
For $$y = -\dfrac12: \; x = 5^{-1/2} = \dfrac1{\sqrt{5}}.$$
All four values are positive real numbers, so they all satisfy the original equation.
The required product is
$$25 \times \dfrac1{25} \times \sqrt{5} \times \dfrac1{\sqrt{5}} = 1.$$
Hence, the product of all positive real solutions is 1.
Let $$A = \{x \in R : |x + 1| < 2\}$$ and $$B = \{x \in R : |x - 1| \geq 2\}$$. Then which one the following statements is NOT true?
We have $$A = \{x \in \mathbb{R} : |x + 1| < 2\}$$ and $$B = \{x \in \mathbb{R} : |x - 1| \geq 2\}$$.
For set $$A$$: $$|x + 1| < 2$$ means $$-2 < x + 1 < 2$$, so $$-3 < x < 1$$. Thus $$A = (-3, 1)$$.
For set $$B$$: $$|x - 1| \geq 2$$ means $$x - 1 \geq 2$$ or $$x - 1 \leq -2$$, so $$x \geq 3$$ or $$x \leq -1$$. Thus $$B = (-\infty, -1] \cup [3, \infty)$$.
Now we check each option:
Option A: $$A - B = A \cap B^c$$. We have $$B^c = (-1, 3)$$. So $$A - B = (-3, 1) \cap (-1, 3) = (-1, 1)$$. This matches Option A. $$\checkmark$$
Option B: $$B - A = B \cap A^c$$. We have $$A^c = (-\infty, -3] \cup [1, \infty)$$. So $$B - A = [(-\infty, -1] \cup [3, \infty)] \cap [(-\infty, -3] \cup [1, \infty)] = (-\infty, -3] \cup [3, \infty)$$. This equals $$\mathbb{R} - (-3, 3)$$, not $$\mathbb{R} - (-3, 1)$$. So Option B is NOT true. $$\times$$
Option C: $$A \cap B = (-3, 1) \cap [(-\infty, -1] \cup [3, \infty)] = (-3, -1]$$. This matches Option C. $$\checkmark$$
Option D: $$A \cup B = (-3, 1) \cup (-\infty, -1] \cup [3, \infty) = (-\infty, 1) \cup [3, \infty) = \mathbb{R} - [1, 3)$$. This matches Option D. $$\checkmark$$
The statement that is NOT true is Option B.
Let $$S = \{x \in [-6, 3] - \{-2, 2\} : \frac{|x+3|-1}{|x|-2} \geq 0\}$$ and $$T = \{x \in \mathbb{Z} : x^2 - 7|x| + 9 \leq 0\}$$. Then the number of elements in $$S \cap T$$ is
We need to find the sets $$S$$ and $$T$$ and then determine the number of elements in $$S \cap T$$.
We have $$S = \{x \in [-6, 3] \setminus \{-2, 2\} : \frac{|x+3|-1}{|x|-2} \geq 0\}$$.
The numerator $$|x+3| - 1 \geq 0$$ when $$|x+3| \geq 1$$, i.e., $$x \leq -4$$ or $$x \geq -2$$. The numerator is negative when $$-4 < x < -2$$.
The denominator $$|x| - 2 > 0$$ when $$x < -2$$ or $$x > 2$$, and $$|x| - 2 < 0$$ when $$-2 < x < 2$$. The points $$x = \pm 2$$ are excluded.
For the fraction to be non-negative, we need both numerator and denominator to share the same sign (or numerator equals zero).
Case 1: Numerator $$\geq 0$$ and denominator $$> 0$$. This requires $$(x \leq -4 \text{ or } x \geq -2)$$ and $$(x < -2 \text{ or } x > 2)$$. Within $$[-6, 3] \setminus \{-2, 2\}$$, this gives $$[-6, -4] \cup (2, 3]$$.
Case 2: Numerator $$\leq 0$$ and denominator $$< 0$$. This requires $$-4 < x < -2$$ and $$-2 < x < 2$$. These intervals do not overlap, so this case contributes nothing.
Therefore $$S = [-6, -4] \cup (2, 3]$$.
Now for $$T$$, we solve $$x^2 - 7|x| + 9 \leq 0$$ over integers. Setting $$u = |x|$$, we get $$u^2 - 7u + 9 \leq 0$$. The roots are $$u = \frac{7 \pm \sqrt{13}}{2}$$, which gives approximately $$u \in [1.697, 5.303]$$. So for integer values of $$u$$: $$u \in \{2, 3, 4, 5\}$$, and therefore $$T = \{-5, -4, -3, -2, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$$.
Now $$S \cap T$$ consists of elements of $$T$$ that lie in $$S = [-6, -4] \cup (2, 3]$$. From $$[-6, -4]$$, we get $$\{-5, -4\}$$. From $$(2, 3]$$, we get $$\{3\}$$. So $$S \cap T = \{-5, -4, 3\}$$, which has 3 elements.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 4.
Let
$$p$$: Ramesh listens to music.
$$q$$: Ramesh is out of his village
$$r$$: It is Sunday
$$s$$: It is Saturday
Then the statement "Ramesh listens to music only if he is in his village and it is Sunday or Saturday" can be expressed as
We are given the statements:
$$p$$: Ramesh listens to music
$$q$$: Ramesh is out of his village
$$r$$: It is Sunday
$$s$$: It is Saturday
The statement to express is: "Ramesh listens to music only if he is in his village and it is Sunday or Saturday."
The phrase "P only if Q" translates to $$P \Rightarrow Q$$. So "Ramesh listens to music only if (condition)" becomes $$p \Rightarrow \text{(condition)}$$.
Now the condition is "he is in his village and it is Sunday or Saturday." Being "in his village" is the negation of $$q$$ (since $$q$$ means "out of his village"), so this is $$\sim q$$. "It is Sunday or Saturday" is $$r \vee s$$.
So the condition is $$(\sim q) \wedge (r \vee s)$$.
Therefore the full statement is $$p \Rightarrow ((\sim q) \wedge (r \vee s))$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 4.
Let $$p, q, r$$ be three logical statements. Consider the compound statements
$$S_1 : ((\sim p) \vee q) \vee ((\sim p) \vee r)$$ and $$S_2 : p \to (q \vee r)$$
Then, which of the following is NOT true?
We are given the formulas $$S_1 : ((\sim p) \vee q) \vee ((\sim p) \vee r)$$ and $$S_2 : p \to (q \vee r)$$.
To simplify $$S_1$$, we use the associative and idempotent laws of disjunction: $$S_1 = (\sim p \vee q) \vee (\sim p \vee r) = \sim p \vee q \vee \sim p \vee r = \sim p \vee q \vee r.$$
Next, the implication in $$S_2$$ is equivalent to a disjunction, namely $$S_2 = \sim p \vee (q \vee r) = \sim p \vee q \vee r.$$
Since both $$S_1$$ and $$S_2$$ simplify to the same expression $$\sim p \vee q \vee r$$, they are logically equivalent: $$S_1 \equiv S_2$$.
We now evaluate each option:
Option A: “If $$S_2$$ is True, then $$S_1$$ is True.” This holds because $$S_1 \equiv S_2$$.
Option B: “If $$S_2$$ is False, then $$S_1$$ is False.” This also holds by equivalence.
Option C: “If $$S_2$$ is False, then $$S_1$$ is True.” This would require different truth values for $$S_1$$ and $$S_2$$, contradicting their equivalence, so it is not true.
Option D: “If $$S_1$$ is False, then $$S_2$$ is False.” This holds by equivalence.
Therefore, the statement that is NOT true is Option C.
The statement $$(\sim(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q)) \wedge q$$ is:
We need to determine what the statement $$(\sim(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q)) \wedge q$$ is equivalent to.
$$p \Leftrightarrow \sim q$$ is true when p and $$\sim q$$ have the same truth value, i.e., when p and q have opposite truth values.
Therefore, $$\sim(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q)$$ is true when p and q have the same truth value, which means $$\sim(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q) \equiv (p \Leftrightarrow q)$$.
The statement becomes $$(p \Leftrightarrow q) \wedge q$$.
$$p = T, q = T$$: $$(T \Leftrightarrow T) \wedge T = T \wedge T = T$$
$$p = T, q = F$$: $$(T \Leftrightarrow F) \wedge F = F \wedge F = F$$
$$p = F, q = T$$: $$(F \Leftrightarrow T) \wedge T = F \wedge T = F$$
$$p = F, q = F$$: $$(F \Leftrightarrow F) \wedge F = T \wedge F = F$$
The statement is true only when $$p = T$$ and $$q = T$$, which is $$p \wedge q$$.
Option D: $$(p \Rightarrow q) \wedge p$$
$$p = T, q = T$$: $$T \wedge T = T$$
$$p = T, q = F$$: $$F \wedge T = F$$
$$p = F, q = T$$: $$T \wedge F = F$$
$$p = F, q = F$$: $$T \wedge F = F$$
This is also equivalent to $$p \wedge q$$. ✓
Therefore, the correct answer is Option D: equivalent to $$(p \Rightarrow q) \wedge p$$.
Consider the following statements:
$$A$$: Rishi is a judge.
$$B$$: Rishi is honest.
$$C$$: Rishi is not arrogant.
The negation of the statement "if Rishi is a judge and he is not arrogant, then he is honest" is
We are given the statements: $$A$$: Rishi is a judge, $$B$$: Rishi is honest, and $$C$$: Rishi is not arrogant.
The statement "if Rishi is a judge and he is not arrogant, then he is honest" can be written as: $$(A \wedge C) \to B$$
Recall that the negation of an implication $$p \to q$$ is $$p \wedge (\sim q)$$, so $$\sim[(A \wedge C) \to B] = (A \wedge C) \wedge (\sim B)$$.
This can be rewritten as: $$(\sim B) \wedge (A \wedge C)$$
Therefore, the negation is Option B: $$(\sim B) \wedge (A \wedge C)$$.
Consider the following two propositions :
$$P_1 : \sim p \to \sim q$$
$$P_2 : p \wedge \sim q \wedge \sim p \vee q$$
If the proposition $$p \to \sim p \vee q$$ is evaluated as FALSE, then
Let $$r \in (P, q, \sim p, \sim q)$$ be such that the logical statement $$r \vee (\sim p) \Rightarrow (p \wedge q) \vee r$$ is a tautology. Then $$r$$ is equal to
First, we need to find $$r \in \{p, q, \sim p, \sim q\}$$ such that $$r \vee (\sim p) \Rightarrow (p \wedge q) \vee r$$ is a tautology.
Next, recall that an implication $$P \Rightarrow Q$$ is a tautology when $$Q$$ is true whenever $$P$$ is true. Therefore, we need: whenever $$r \vee (\sim p)$$ is true, $$(p \wedge q) \vee r$$ must also be true.
Now, test $$r = \sim p$$. The statement becomes:
$$ (\sim p) \vee (\sim p) \Rightarrow (p \wedge q) \vee (\sim p) $$
Substituting, this simplifies to:
$$ \sim p \Rightarrow (p \wedge q) \vee (\sim p) $$
Since the implication must hold in all cases, consider the following:
Case 1: $$p$$ is True (so $$\sim p$$ is False). The implication $$F \Rightarrow \text{anything}$$ is True.
Case 2: $$p$$ is False (so $$\sim p$$ is True). The RHS becomes $$(F \wedge q) \vee T = T$$. So $$T \Rightarrow T$$ is True.
Since the implication is true in all cases, it is a tautology. ✓
Next, verify that the other options fail.
For $$r = p$$: Let $$p = F, q = F$$. Then LHS: $$F \vee T = T$$, RHS: $$(F \wedge F) \vee F = F$$. So $$T \Rightarrow F$$ is False. ✗
For $$r = q$$: Let $$p = F, q = F$$. Then LHS: $$F \vee T = T$$, RHS: $$(F \wedge F) \vee F = F$$. So $$T \Rightarrow F$$ is False. ✗
For $$r = \sim q$$: Let $$p = T, q = T$$. Then LHS: $$F \vee F = F$$, so implication is True. Let $$p = F, q = T$$. Then LHS: $$F \vee T = T$$, RHS: $$(F \wedge T) \vee F = F$$. So $$T \Rightarrow F$$ is False. ✗
Therefore, the answer is Option C: $$\sim p$$.
The boolean expression $$(\sim(p \wedge q)) \vee q$$ is equivalent to
We need to find the expression equivalent to $$(\sim(p \wedge q)) \vee q$$.
Using De Morgan's law: $$\sim(p \wedge q) = \sim p \vee \sim q$$. Substituting gives $$(\sim(p \wedge q)) \vee q = (\sim p \vee \sim q) \vee q = \sim p \vee (\sim q \vee q) = \sim p \vee T = T$$ (since $$\sim q \vee q$$ is always true), so the original expression is a tautology.
Next, we examine each option:
Option A: $$q \to (p \wedge q) = \sim q \vee (p \wedge q) = (\sim q \vee p) \wedge (\sim q \vee q) = (\sim q \vee p) \wedge T = \sim q \vee p$$. This is NOT always true (fails when $$p = F, q = T$$), so it is not a tautology.
Option B: $$p \to q = \sim p \vee q$$. This is NOT always true (fails when $$p = T, q = F$$), so it is not a tautology.
Option C: $$p \to (p \to q) = p \to (\sim p \vee q) = \sim p \vee (\sim p \vee q) = \sim p \vee q$$. This is the same as Option B and thus not a tautology.
Option D: $$p \to (p \vee q) = \sim p \vee (p \vee q) = (\sim p \vee p) \vee q = T \vee q = T$$. This is always true — a tautology.
Since the given expression simplifies to a tautology, and Option D is also a tautology, they are logically equivalent.
The correct answer is Option D.
The statement $$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (p \wedge r)$$ is equivalent to
We need to determine which statement is equivalent to $$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (p \wedge r)$$.
We begin by rewriting the implication using the identity $$A \Rightarrow B \equiv \neg A \vee B$$. We have $$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (p \wedge r) \equiv \neg(p \wedge q) \vee (p \wedge r) \equiv (\neg p \vee \neg q) \vee (p \wedge r)$$.
Now let us examine Option D: $$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow r \equiv \neg(p \wedge q) \vee r \equiv (\neg p \vee \neg q) \vee r$$.
We claim these two expressions are logically equivalent. To verify, we check all cases based on $$p$$.
Case 1: If $$p$$ is false, then $$\neg p$$ is true, so both $$(\neg p \vee \neg q) \vee (p \wedge r)$$ and $$(\neg p \vee \neg q) \vee r$$ evaluate to true regardless of $$q$$ and $$r$$.
Case 2: If $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is false, then $$\neg q$$ is true, so both expressions again evaluate to true.
Case 3: If $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is true, then $$\neg p \vee \neg q = \text{false}$$. The first expression becomes $$(p \wedge r) = r$$ (since $$p$$ is true), and the second becomes simply $$r$$. Hence both equal $$r$$.
In every case the two expressions agree, confirming that $$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (p \wedge r) \equiv (p \wedge q) \Rightarrow r$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Which of the following statements is a tautology?
We need to determine which of the given statements is a tautology (always true regardless of truth values of $$ p $$ and $$ q $$).
Recall that $$ A \Rightarrow B $$ is equivalent to $$ \sim A \lor B $$.
$$q \Rightarrow (\sim p \lor q) \equiv \sim q \lor (\sim p \lor q) \equiv \sim p \lor (\sim q \lor q) \equiv \sim p \lor T \equiv T$$
Since $$ \sim q \lor q $$ is always true (law of excluded middle), the entire expression simplifies to True. This is a tautology.
Option A: $$ (\sim p \lor q) \Rightarrow p \equiv \sim(\sim p \lor q) \lor p \equiv (p \land \sim q) \lor p \equiv p $$. This is not a tautology (false when $$ p = F $$).
Option B: $$ p \Rightarrow (\sim p \lor q) \equiv \sim p \lor (\sim p \lor q) \equiv \sim p \lor q $$. This is not a tautology (false when $$ p = T, q = F $$).
Option C: $$ (\sim p \lor q) \Rightarrow q \equiv \sim(\sim p \lor q) \lor q \equiv (p \land \sim q) \lor q \equiv (p \lor q) \land (\sim q \lor q) \equiv p \lor q $$. This is not a tautology (false when $$ p = F, q = F $$).
The tautology is $$ q \Rightarrow (\sim p \lor q) $$, which corresponds to Option D.
If the truth value of the statement $$(P \wedge (\sim R)) \to ((\sim R) \wedge Q)$$ is F, then the truth value of which of the following is F?
The statement $$(P \wedge (\sim R)) \to ((\sim R) \wedge Q)$$ is given to be False. An implication $$p \to q$$ is false only when $$p$$ is True and $$q$$ is False, so we require $$P \wedge (\sim R) = T$$ and $$(\sim R) \wedge Q = F$$. From $$P \wedge (\sim R) = T$$ we deduce $$P = T$$ and $$\sim R = T$$, hence $$R = F$$. Since $$(\sim R) \wedge Q = F$$ and $$\sim R = T$$, it follows that $$Q = F$$. Therefore $$P = T,\ Q = F,\ R = F$$.
Substituting these truth values into each option, we find:
Option A: $$P \vee Q \to \sim R = (T \vee F) \to T = T \to T = T$$
Option B: $$R \vee Q \to \sim P = (F \vee F) \to F = F \to F = T$$
Option C: $$\sim(P \vee Q) \to \sim R = \sim(T) \to T = F \to T = T$$
Option D: $$\sim(R \vee Q) \to \sim P = \sim(F) \to F = T \to F = F$$
The statement with truth value False is $$\boxed{\sim(R \vee Q) \to \sim P}$$, so the answer is Option D.
Let the operations $$*, \odot \in \{\wedge, \vee\}$$. If $$(p * q) \odot (p \odot \sim q)$$ is a tautology, then the ordered pair $$(*, \odot)$$ is
We need to find the ordered pair $$(*, \odot)$$ from $$\{\wedge, \vee\}$$ such that $$(p * q) \odot (p \odot \sim q)$$ is a tautology.
Step 1: Test each option systematically.
Option B: $$(*, \odot) = (\vee, \vee)$$
The expression becomes: $$(p \vee q) \vee (p \vee \sim q)$$
$$= p \vee q \vee p \vee \sim q$$
$$= p \vee (q \vee \sim q)$$
$$= p \vee T$$
$$= T$$
This is a tautology.
Step 2: Verify that other options are not tautologies.
Option A: $$(*, \odot) = (\vee, \wedge)$$
$$(p \vee q) \wedge (p \wedge \sim q)$$
When $$p = F, q = T$$: $$(F \vee T) \wedge (F \wedge F) = T \wedge F = F$$. Not a tautology.
Option C: $$(*, \odot) = (\wedge, \wedge)$$
$$(p \wedge q) \wedge (p \wedge \sim q)$$
$$= p \wedge (q \wedge \sim q) = p \wedge F = F$$. Not a tautology (always false).
Option D: $$(*, \odot) = (\wedge, \vee)$$
$$(p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee \sim q)$$
When $$p = F, q = T$$: $$(F \wedge T) \vee (F \vee F) = F \vee F = F$$. Not a tautology.
Only Option B gives a tautology.
The correct answer is Option B: $$(\vee, \vee)$$
The number of choices for $$\Delta \in \{\wedge, \vee, \Rightarrow, \Leftrightarrow\}$$, such that $$(p \Delta q) \Rightarrow ((p \Delta \sim q) \vee ((\sim p) \Delta q))$$ is a tautology, is
We need to find how many choices for $$\Delta \in \{\wedge, \vee, \Rightarrow, \Leftrightarrow\}$$ make $$(p \Delta q) \Rightarrow ((p \Delta \sim q) \vee ((\sim p) \Delta q))$$ a tautology.
Recall that $$P \Rightarrow Q$$ is false only when $$P$$ is true and $$Q$$ is false. So the expression is a tautology if whenever $$(p \Delta q)$$ is true, at least one of $$(p \Delta \sim q)$$ or $$(\sim p \Delta q)$$ is also true.
Case 1: $$\Delta = \wedge$$ (AND)
$$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow ((p \wedge \sim q) \vee (\sim p \wedge q))$$
When $$p = T, q = T$$: LHS = T. RHS = $$(T \wedge F) \vee (F \wedge T) = F \vee F = F$$.
So the implication is F. Not a tautology.
Case 2: $$\Delta = \vee$$ (OR)
$$(p \vee q) \Rightarrow ((p \vee \sim q) \vee (\sim p \vee q))$$
RHS: $$(p \vee \sim q) \vee (\sim p \vee q) = (p \vee \sim p) \vee (q \vee \sim q) = T \vee T = T$$.
Since RHS is always T, the implication is always T. Tautology.
Case 3: $$\Delta = \Rightarrow$$ (Implication)
$$(p \Rightarrow q) \Rightarrow ((p \Rightarrow \sim q) \vee (\sim p \Rightarrow q))$$
$$(\sim p \Rightarrow q)$$ is equivalent to $$(p \vee q)$$. This is false only when $$p = F, q = F$$.
When $$p = F, q = F$$: LHS = $$(F \Rightarrow F) = T$$. RHS = $$(F \Rightarrow T) \vee (T \Rightarrow F) = T \vee F = T$$.
When $$p = T, q = T$$: LHS = T. RHS = $$(T \Rightarrow F) \vee (F \Rightarrow T) = F \vee T = T$$.
When $$p = T, q = F$$: LHS = F. So implication is T.
When $$p = F, q = T$$: LHS = T. RHS = $$(F \Rightarrow F) \vee (T \Rightarrow T) = T \vee T = T$$.
All cases give T. Tautology.
Case 4: $$\Delta = \Leftrightarrow$$ (Biconditional)
$$(p \Leftrightarrow q) \Rightarrow ((p \Leftrightarrow \sim q) \vee (\sim p \Leftrightarrow q))$$
Note: $$(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q) = \sim(p \Leftrightarrow q)$$ and $$(\sim p \Leftrightarrow q) = \sim(p \Leftrightarrow q)$$.
So RHS = $$\sim(p \Leftrightarrow q) \vee \sim(p \Leftrightarrow q) = \sim(p \Leftrightarrow q)$$.
The expression becomes: $$(p \Leftrightarrow q) \Rightarrow \sim(p \Leftrightarrow q)$$.
When $$p = T, q = T$$: $$(T) \Rightarrow (F) = F$$. Not a tautology.
Therefore, exactly 2 choices ($$\vee$$ and $$\Rightarrow$$) make the expression a tautology.
The answer is Option B: 2.
The statement $$(p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \Rightarrow r)$$ is NOT equivalent to:
We need to determine which statement is NOT equivalent to $$(p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \Rightarrow r)$$.
We first simplify the given statement. We know $$p \Rightarrow q \equiv \sim p \vee q$$ and $$p \Rightarrow r \equiv \sim p \vee r$$. So $$(p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \Rightarrow r) \equiv (\sim p \vee q) \vee (\sim p \vee r) \equiv \sim p \vee q \vee r$$. This is equivalent to $$p \Rightarrow (q \vee r)$$.
Now we check each option:
Option A: $$(p \wedge \sim r) \Rightarrow q \equiv \sim(p \wedge \sim r) \vee q \equiv \sim p \vee r \vee q$$. This equals $$\sim p \vee q \vee r$$. Equivalent.
Option B: $$\sim q \Rightarrow (\sim r \vee p) \equiv q \vee \sim r \vee p$$. This is $$p \vee q \vee \sim r$$, which is NOT the same as $$\sim p \vee q \vee r$$. For example, when $$p = T, q = F, r = T$$: our expression gives $$F \vee F \vee T = T$$, but Option B gives $$T \vee F \vee F = T$$. Try $$p = T, q = F, r = F$$: our expression gives $$F \vee F \vee F = F$$, but Option B gives $$T \vee F \vee T = T$$. So they differ. NOT equivalent.
Option C: $$p \Rightarrow (q \vee r) \equiv \sim p \vee q \vee r$$. Equivalent (same as our simplified form).
Option D: $$(p \wedge \sim q) \Rightarrow r \equiv \sim(p \wedge \sim q) \vee r \equiv \sim p \vee q \vee r$$. Equivalent.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B: $$\sim q \Rightarrow (\sim r \vee p)$$.
Which of the following statement is a tautology?
We need to identify which of the given statements is a tautology (always true regardless of truth values of $$p$$ and $$q$$).
Analyze Option A: $$((\sim q) \wedge p) \wedge q$$
This simplifies to $$p \wedge q \wedge (\sim q)$$, which contains $$q \wedge (\sim q) = F$$.
So this is always False (contradiction). Not a tautology.
Analyze Option B: $$((\sim q) \wedge p) \wedge (p \wedge (\sim p))$$
The term $$p \wedge (\sim p) = F$$.
So the entire expression is $$(\text{anything}) \wedge F = F$$.
This is always False (contradiction). Not a tautology.
Analyze Option C: $$((\sim q) \wedge p) \vee (p \vee (\sim p))$$
The term $$p \vee (\sim p) = T$$ (this is a tautology by itself).
So the entire expression is $$(\text{anything}) \vee T = T$$.
This is always True. This is a tautology!
Analyze Option D: $$(p \wedge q) \wedge (\sim(p \wedge q))$$
Let $$r = p \wedge q$$. Then this becomes $$r \wedge (\sim r) = F$$.
This is always False (contradiction). Not a tautology.
Therefore, the tautology is Option C: $$((\sim q) \wedge p) \vee (p \vee (\sim p))$$.
The correct answer is Option C.
For $$\alpha \in \mathbb{N}$$, consider a relation R on $$\mathbb{N}$$ given by $$R = \{(x, y) : 3x + \alpha y$$ is a multiple of 7$$\}$$. The relation R is an equivalence relation if and only if
We need to find the condition on $$\alpha \in \mathbb{N}$$ for the relation $$R = \{(x, y) : 3x + \alpha y \text{ is a multiple of } 7\}$$ on $$\mathbb{N}$$ to be an equivalence relation.
Step 1: Check Reflexivity.
$$(x, x) \in R \Leftrightarrow 3x + \alpha x \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$ for all $$x \in \mathbb{N}$$
$$\Leftrightarrow (3 + \alpha)x \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$ for all $$x$$
This requires $$3 + \alpha \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$, i.e., $$\alpha \equiv 4 \pmod{7}$$.
Step 2: Check Symmetry (with $$\alpha \equiv 4 \pmod 7$$).
If $$(x, y) \in R$$, then $$3x + 4y \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$ (using $$\alpha \equiv 4 \pmod 7$$).
We need to show $$3y + 4x \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$.
From $$3x + 4y \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$: $$3x \equiv -4y \pmod{7}$$.
Since $$3^{-1} \equiv 5 \pmod{7}$$ (as $$3 \times 5 = 15 \equiv 1$$), we get $$x \equiv -20y \equiv -6y \equiv y \pmod{7}$$.
Now: $$3y + 4x \equiv 3y + 4y \equiv 7y \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$. Symmetric!
Step 3: Check Transitivity.
If $$(x, y) \in R$$ and $$(y, z) \in R$$:
$$3x + 4y \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$ and $$3y + 4z \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$
From above, $$x \equiv y \pmod{7}$$ and $$y \equiv z \pmod{7}$$, so $$x \equiv z \pmod{7}$$.
Then $$3x + 4z \equiv 3z + 4z = 7z \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$. Transitive!
Step 4: Conclusion.
R is an equivalence relation if and only if $$\alpha \equiv 4 \pmod{7}$$, i.e., 4 is the remainder when $$\alpha$$ is divided by 7.
The correct answer is Option D: 4 is the remainder when $$\alpha$$ is divided by 7
Let R be a relation from the set $$\{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 60\}$$ to itself such that $$R = \{(a, b) : b = pq$$, where $$p, q \geq 3$$ are prime numbers$$\}$$. Then, the number of elements in R is
We have the relation $$R = \{(a, b) : b = pq, \text{ where } p, q \geq 3 \text{ are prime numbers}\}$$ from the set $$\{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 60\}$$ to itself. We need to find the number of elements in $$R$$.
We first identify all possible values of $$b$$. We need $$b = pq$$ where $$p$$ and $$q$$ are primes with $$p, q \geq 3$$, and $$b \leq 60$$. The primes $$\geq 3$$ are $$3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, \ldots$$
We systematically list all products $$pq \leq 60$$ (where $$p \leq q$$):
With $$p = 3$$: $$3 \times 3 = 9$$, $$3 \times 5 = 15$$, $$3 \times 7 = 21$$, $$3 \times 11 = 33$$, $$3 \times 13 = 39$$, $$3 \times 17 = 51$$, $$3 \times 19 = 57$$. (Note $$3 \times 23 = 69 > 60$$.)
With $$p = 5$$: $$5 \times 5 = 25$$, $$5 \times 7 = 35$$, $$5 \times 11 = 55$$. (Note $$5 \times 13 = 65 > 60$$.)
With $$p = 7$$: $$7 \times 7 = 49$$. (Note $$7 \times 11 = 77 > 60$$.)
So the distinct values of $$b$$ are: $$9, 15, 21, 25, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 55, 57$$, which gives us 11 possible values.
Now, for each valid $$b$$, the value of $$a$$ can be any element in $$\{1, 2, \ldots, 60\}$$, giving 60 choices.
Hence the total number of elements in $$R$$ is $$11 \times 60 = 660$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$R_1 = \{(a,b) \in N \times N : |a - b| \leq 13\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(a,b) \in N \times N : |a - b| \neq 13\}$$. Then on $$N$$:
We need to check whether $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ are equivalence relations on $$\mathbb{N}$$.
Analysis of $$R_1 = \{(a, b) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} : |a - b| \leq 13\}$$:
- Reflexive: $$|a - a| = 0 \leq 13$$ $$\checkmark$$
- Symmetric: $$|a - b| = |b - a|$$ $$\checkmark$$
- Transitive: Consider $$a = 1, b = 14, c = 27$$. We have $$|1 - 14| = 13 \leq 13$$ and $$|14 - 27| = 13 \leq 13$$, but $$|1 - 27| = 26 > 13$$. So $$(1, 14) \in R_1$$ and $$(14, 27) \in R_1$$, but $$(1, 27) \notin R_1$$. $$\boldsymbol{\times}$$
$$R_1$$ is not an equivalence relation (fails transitivity).
Analysis of $$R_2 = \{(a, b) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} : |a - b| \neq 13\}$$:
- Reflexive: $$|a - a| = 0 \neq 13$$ $$\checkmark$$
- Symmetric: $$|a - b| = |b - a|$$ $$\checkmark$$
- Transitive: Consider $$a = 1, b = 2, c = 14$$. We have $$|1 - 2| = 1 \neq 13$$ and $$|2 - 14| = 12 \neq 13$$, but $$|1 - 14| = 13$$. So $$(1, 2) \in R_2$$ and $$(2, 14) \in R_2$$, but $$(1, 14) \notin R_2$$. $$\boldsymbol{\times}$$
$$R_2$$ is not an equivalence relation (fails transitivity).
The correct answer is Option B: Neither $$R_1$$ nor $$R_2$$ is an equivalence relation.
Negation of the Boolean expression $$p \leftrightarrow (q \rightarrow p)$$ is
We need to find the negation of the Boolean expression $$p \leftrightarrow (q \rightarrow p)$$.
$$q \rightarrow p \equiv \sim q \vee p$$
$$p \leftrightarrow (\sim q \vee p) \equiv [p \rightarrow (\sim q \vee p)] \wedge [(\sim q \vee p) \rightarrow p]$$
The first part: $$p \rightarrow (\sim q \vee p) \equiv \sim p \vee \sim q \vee p \equiv T$$ (tautology, since $$\sim p \vee p = T$$)
So: $$p \leftrightarrow (\sim q \vee p) \equiv T \wedge [(\sim q \vee p) \rightarrow p] \equiv (\sim q \vee p) \rightarrow p$$
$$(\sim q \vee p) \rightarrow p \equiv \sim(\sim q \vee p) \vee p \equiv (q \wedge \sim p) \vee p$$
$$\equiv (q \vee p) \wedge (\sim p \vee p) \equiv (q \vee p) \wedge T \equiv q \vee p \equiv p \vee q$$
So $$p \leftrightarrow (q \rightarrow p) \equiv p \vee q$$.
$$\sim(p \vee q) \equiv \sim p \wedge \sim q$$
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | $$q \rightarrow p$$ | $$p \leftrightarrow (q \rightarrow p)$$ | Negation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | T | F |
| T | F | T | T | F |
| F | T | F | T | F |
| F | F | T | F | T |
The negation is T only when both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are F, which is $$\sim p \wedge \sim q$$. $$\checkmark$$
Therefore, the correct answer is Option D: $$\sim p \wedge \sim q$$.
Negation of the Boolean statement $$(p \vee q) \Rightarrow ((\sim r) \vee p)$$ is equivalent to:
We need to find the negation of $$(p \vee q) \Rightarrow ((\sim r) \vee p)$$. The negation of $$A \Rightarrow B$$ is $$A \wedge (\sim B)$$. Here $$A = (p \vee q)$$ and $$B = ((\sim r) \vee p)$$, so its negation is $$(p \vee q) \wedge \sim((\sim r) \vee p)$$.
By De Morgan's law, $$\sim((\sim r) \vee p) = r \wedge (\sim p)$$, therefore the expression becomes $$(p \vee q) \wedge r \wedge (\sim p)$$. Since $$\sim p$$ holds, $$(p \vee q) \wedge (\sim p)$$ simplifies to $$q \wedge (\sim p)$$, giving $$(\sim p) \wedge q \wedge r$$.
Therefore, the answer is Option C: $$(\sim p) \wedge q \wedge r$$.
Consider the following statements:
$$P$$: Ramu is intelligent.
$$Q$$: Ramu is rich.
$$R$$: Ramu is not honest.
The negation of the statement "Ramu is intelligent and honest if and only if Ramu is not rich" can be expressed as:
We are given: $$P$$: Ramu is intelligent, $$Q$$: Ramu is rich, $$R$$: Ramu is not honest. So "Ramu is honest" is $$\sim R$$.
The statement "Ramu is intelligent and honest if and only if Ramu is not rich" translates to $$(P \wedge \sim R) \leftrightarrow (\sim Q)$$.
The negation of a biconditional is: $$\sim(A \leftrightarrow B) = (A \wedge \sim B) \vee (\sim A \wedge B)$$.
Here $$A = P \wedge (\sim R)$$ and $$B = \sim Q$$.
The first part: $$A \wedge \sim B = (P \wedge (\sim R)) \wedge Q$$.
The second part: $$\sim A \wedge B = \sim(P \wedge (\sim R)) \wedge (\sim Q) = ((\sim P) \vee R) \wedge (\sim Q)$$.
The full negation is $$((P \wedge (\sim R)) \wedge Q) \vee (((\sim P) \vee R) \wedge (\sim Q))$$.
The answer is Option D: $$((P \wedge (\sim R)) \wedge Q) \vee ((\sim Q) \wedge ((\sim P) \vee R))$$.
Let a function $$f : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$$ be defined by
$$f(n) = \begin{cases} 2n, & n = 2, 4, 6, 8, \ldots \\ n-1, & n = 3, 7, 11, 15, \ldots \\ \frac{n+1}{2}, & n = 1, 5, 9, 13, \ldots \end{cases}$$
then, $$f$$ is
The function $$f : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$$ is defined as:
$$f(n) = \begin{cases} 2n, & n = 2, 4, 6, 8, \ldots \text{ (even numbers)} \\ n-1, & n = 3, 7, 11, 15, \ldots \text{ (} n \equiv 3 \pmod{4}\text{)} \\ \frac{n+1}{2}, & n = 1, 5, 9, 13, \ldots \text{ (} n \equiv 1 \pmod{4}\text{)} \end{cases}$$
For even inputs $$n = 2,4,6,\ldots$$, we have $$f(n)=2n$$, which yields $$4,8,12,16,\ldots$$—all multiples of 4, i.e.\ $$\{n\in\mathbb{N}:n\equiv0\pmod4\}$$. If $$n\equiv3\pmod4$$ (so $$n=3,7,11,\ldots$$), then $$f(n)=n-1$$ gives $$2,6,10,14,\ldots$$—the set $$\{n\in\mathbb{N}:n\equiv2\pmod4\}$$. Finally, if $$n\equiv1\pmod4$$ (so $$n=1,5,9,\ldots$$), then $$f(n)=\frac{n+1}{2}$$ produces $$1,3,5,7,\ldots$$—all odd natural numbers.
Thus the range of $$f$$ is $$\{1,3,5,7,\ldots\}\cup\{2,6,10,14,\ldots\}\cup\{4,8,12,16,\ldots\}=\{\text{odd numbers}\}\cup\{\text{numbers}\equiv2\pmod4\}\cup\{\text{multiples of }4\}=\mathbb{N},$$ so $$f$$ is onto.
The three output sets—odd numbers, numbers congruent to 2 mod 4, and multiples of 4—are mutually disjoint, and in each case the rule is strictly increasing (hence injective). Therefore $$f$$ is one-one as well.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option A: One-one and onto.
Let $$f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be a continuous function such that $$f(3x) - f(x) = x$$. If $$f(8) = 7$$, then $$f(14)$$ is equal to:
We have $$f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ continuous, with $$f(3x) - f(x) = x$$, $$f(8) = 7$$.
Let $$f(x) = ax + b$$. Then:
$$f(3x) - f(x) = 3ax + b - ax - b = 2ax = x$$
$$\implies a = \frac{1}{2}$$
So $$f(x) = \frac{x}{2} + b$$.
$$f(8) = \frac{8}{2} + b = 4 + b = 7 \implies b = 3$$
$$f(x) = \frac{x}{2} + 3$$
$$f(14) = \frac{14}{2} + 3 = 7 + 3 = 10$$
Verification: $$f(3 \times 14) - f(14) = f(42) - f(14) = (21 + 3) - (7 + 3) = 24 - 10 = 14$$ ✓
Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: 10.
The negation of the Boolean expression $$\sim q \wedge p \Rightarrow \sim p \vee q$$ is logically equivalent to
The total number of functions, $$f: \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \to \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$$ such that $$f(1) + f(2) = f(3)$$, is equal to
We need to count the total number of functions $$ f: \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \to \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\} $$ such that $$ f(1) + f(2) = f(3) $$.
We need $$ f(1) + f(2) = f(3) $$, where $$ f(1), f(2) \in \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\} $$ and $$ f(3) \in \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\} $$.
So we need $$ 2 \le f(1) + f(2) \le 6 $$ (since both are at least 1, and the sum must be at most 6).
Count pairs $$ (f(1), f(2)) $$ for each value of $$ f(3) $$:
- $$ f(3) = 2 $$: $$ f(1) + f(2) = 2 $$: only $$ (1,1) $$ — 1 pair
- $$ f(3) = 3 $$: $$ f(1) + f(2) = 3 $$: $$ (1,2), (2,1) $$ — 2 pairs
- $$ f(3) = 4 $$: $$ f(1) + f(2) = 4 $$: $$ (1,3), (2,2), (3,1) $$ — 3 pairs
- $$ f(3) = 5 $$: $$ f(1) + f(2) = 5 $$: $$ (1,4), (2,3), (3,2), (4,1) $$ — 4 pairs
- $$ f(3) = 6 $$: $$ f(1) + f(2) = 6 $$: $$ (1,5), (2,4), (3,3), (4,2), (5,1) $$ — 5 pairs
Total valid triples = $$ 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15 $$.
$$ f(4) $$ can be any value in $$ \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\} $$, so there are 6 choices.
$$\text{Total} = 15 \times 6 = 90$$
The total number of functions is 90, which corresponds to Option B.
Let $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined as $$f(x) = x - 1$$ and $$g : R \to \{1, -1\} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined as $$g(x) = \frac{x^2}{x^2 - 1}$$. Then the function $$fog$$ is:
We need to determine whether $$f \circ g$$ is one-one and/or onto, where $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ is defined as $$f(x) = x - 1$$ and $$g : \mathbb{R} \setminus \{1, -1\} \to \mathbb{R}$$ is defined as $$g(x) = \frac{x^2}{x^2 - 1}$$.
First, we find the composite function. The domain of $$f \circ g$$ is the domain of $$g$$, which is $$\mathbb{R} \setminus \{-1, 1\}$$, and the codomain is $$\mathbb{R}$$. Substituting gives $$f(g(x)) = g(x) - 1 = \frac{x^2}{x^2 - 1} - 1 = \frac{x^2 - (x^2 - 1)}{x^2 - 1} = \frac{1}{x^2 - 1}.$$
Next, we check if $$f \circ g$$ is one-one (injective) by testing whether $$f(g(x_1)) = f(g(x_2))$$ implies $$x_1 = x_2$$. Since $$f(g(x)) = \frac{1}{x^2 - 1}$$ depends only on $$x^2$$, we have $$f(g(x)) = f(g(-x))$$ for all $$x$$ in the domain. For example, take $$x = 2$$ and $$x = -2$$: $$f(g(2)) = \frac{1}{4 - 1} = \frac{1}{3}, \quad f(g(-2)) = \frac{1}{4 - 1} = \frac{1}{3}.$$ Since $$2 \neq -2$$ but $$f(g(2)) = f(g(-2))$$, the function is not one-one.
Now, we check if $$f \circ g$$ is onto (surjective). We need to determine whether every real number $$y$$ is in the range of $$h(x) = \frac{1}{x^2 - 1}$$. Setting $$y = \frac{1}{x^2 - 1}$$ gives $$x^2 - 1 = \frac{1}{y}, \quad x^2 = 1 + \frac{1}{y}.$$ For a real solution to exist, we need $$y \neq 0$$ and $$1 + \frac{1}{y} \geq 0$$, i.e., $$\frac{y + 1}{y} \geq 0.$$ Therefore, such values of $$y$$ satisfy $$y > 0$$ or $$y \leq -1$$ (and additionally $$x \neq \pm 1$$, which means $$x^2 \neq 1$$, i.e., $$\frac{1}{y} \neq 0$$, which is always true).
Case-by-case analysis of values NOT in the range:
Case 1: $$y = 0$$. Since $$\frac{1}{x^2 - 1} = 0$$ has no solution, $$y = 0$$ is not in the range.
Case 2: $$-1 < y < 0$$. Here $$\frac{y + 1}{y} < 0$$, so $$x^2 < 0$$, which gives no real solution. These values are not in the range. For instance, $$y = -\frac{1}{2}$$ gives $$x^2 = 1 - 2 = -1 < 0$$, which has no real solution.
Since not every real number is achieved (the interval $$(-1, 0]$$ is not in the range), the function is not onto.
Therefore, $$f \circ g$$ is neither one-one nor onto.
The answer is Option D: Neither one-one nor onto.
Let $$f : N \to R$$ be a function such that $$f(x + y) = 2f(x)f(y)$$ for natural numbers $$x$$ and $$y$$. If $$f(1) = 2$$, then the value of $$\alpha$$ for which $$\sum_{k=1}^{10} f(\alpha + k) = \frac{512}{3}2^{20} - 1$$ holds, is
We need to find $$\alpha$$ such that $$\sum_{k=1}^{10}f(\alpha + k)=\frac{512}{3}(2^{20}-1)\,.$$
First, observe that $$f(x+y)=2f(x)f(y)$$ with $$f(1)=2$$. Substituting $$x=y=1$$ gives $$f(2)=2f(1)^2=2\times4=8=2^3$$, and then for $$x=1,y=2$$ we get $$f(3)=2f(1)f(2)=2\times2\times8=32=2^5$$. Likewise, $$x=1,y=3$$ yields $$f(4)=2f(1)f(3)=2\times2\times32=128=2^7$$, so by induction the pattern is $$f(n)=2^{2n-1}$$, which indeed satisfies $$f(x+y)=2^{2(x+y)-1}=2\cdot2^{2x-1}\cdot2^{2y-1}=2f(x)f(y)\,. $$
Since $$f(n)=2^{2n-1}$$, the sum becomes $$\sum_{k=1}^{10}f(\alpha + k)=\sum_{k=1}^{10}2^{2(\alpha+k)-1}=2^{2\alpha-1}\sum_{k=1}^{10}2^{2k}=2^{2\alpha-1}\sum_{k=1}^{10}4^k$$ which simplifies to $$2^{2\alpha-1}\cdot\frac{4(4^{10}-1)}{4-1}=2^{2\alpha-1}\cdot\frac{4(2^{20}-1)}{3}\,.$$
Equating this to $$\frac{512}{3}(2^{20}-1)$$ gives $$2^{2\alpha-1}\cdot\frac{4(2^{20}-1)}{3}=\frac{512}{3}(2^{20}-1)\,, $$ hence $$2^{2\alpha-1}\cdot4=512\,, $$ or $$2^{2\alpha-1}\cdot2^2=2^9\,, $$ so $$2^{2\alpha+1}=2^9$$ and therefore $$2\alpha+1=9\implies\alpha=4\,. $$
Thus the correct answer is $$4$$.
The domain of the function $$f(x) = \sin^{-1}[2x^2 - 3] + \log_2\left(\log_{\frac{1}{2}}(x^2 - 5x + 5)\right)$$, where $$[t]$$ is the greatest integer function, is
Let $$\alpha, \beta$$ and $$\gamma$$ be three positive real numbers. Let $$f(x) = \alpha x^5 + \beta x^3 + \gamma x$$, $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$ and $$g: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be such that $$g(f(x)) = x$$ for all $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$. If $$a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots, a_n$$ be in arithmetic progression with mean zero, then the value of $$f\left(g\left(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} f(a_i)\right)\right)$$ is equal to
We need to find $$f\left(g\left(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} f(a_i)\right)\right)$$ where $$a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n$$ are in AP with mean zero.
Step 1: Understand the given functions.
$$f(x) = \alpha x^5 + \beta x^3 + \gamma x$$ where $$\alpha, \beta, \gamma > 0$$.
$$g(f(x)) = x$$ for all $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$, so $$g = f^{-1}$$ ($$g$$ is the inverse function of $$f$$).
Step 2: Observe that $$f$$ is an odd function.
$$f(-x) = \alpha(-x)^5 + \beta(-x)^3 + \gamma(-x) = -\alpha x^5 - \beta x^3 - \gamma x = -f(x)$$
So $$f$$ is an odd function: $$f(-x) = -f(x)$$.
Step 3: Use the AP with mean zero property.
Since $$a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n$$ are in AP with mean zero:
$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i = 0$$
The terms are symmetric about zero, meaning they can be paired as $$a_i$$ and $$a_{n+1-i} = -a_i$$.
Step 4: Evaluate $$\sum f(a_i)$$.
Since the $$a_i$$ are symmetric about 0 and $$f$$ is odd:
$$f(a_i) + f(a_{n+1-i}) = f(a_i) + f(-a_i) = f(a_i) - f(a_i) = 0$$
Each pair sums to zero. If $$n$$ is odd, the middle term is $$a_{(n+1)/2} = 0$$, and $$f(0) = 0$$.
Therefore: $$\sum_{i=1}^{n} f(a_i) = 0$$
Step 5: Compute the final expression.
$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} f(a_i) = \frac{0}{n} = 0$$
$$g(0) = ?$$ Since $$f(0) = 0$$, and $$g = f^{-1}$$, we get $$g(0) = 0$$.
$$f(g(0)) = f(0) = 0$$
The correct answer is Option A: $$0$$
The domain of $$f(x) = \frac{\cos^{-1}\left(\frac{x^2 - 5x + 6}{x^2 - 9}\right)}{\log(x^2 - 3x + 2)}$$ is
Let $$y = y_1(x)$$ and $$y = y_2(x)$$ be two distinct solutions of the differential equation $$\frac{dy}{dx} = x + y$$, with $$y_1(0) = 0$$ and $$y_2(0) = 1$$ respectively. Then, the number of points of intersection of $$y = y_1(x)$$ and $$y = y_2(x)$$ is
We need to find the negation of $$(p \wedge q) \rightarrow (q \vee r)$$.
Step 1: Recall the negation of implication
The negation of $$P \rightarrow Q$$ is $$P \wedge (\sim Q)$$.
Here, $$P = p \wedge q$$ and $$Q = q \vee r$$.
Step 2: Apply the negation
$$\sim[(p \wedge q) \rightarrow (q \vee r)] = (p \wedge q) \wedge \sim(q \vee r)$$
Step 3: Simplify $$\sim(q \vee r)$$
By De Morgan's law: $$\sim(q \vee r) = (\sim q) \wedge (\sim r)$$
Step 4: Combine
$$(p \wedge q) \wedge (\sim q) \wedge (\sim r) = p \wedge q \wedge (\sim q) \wedge (\sim r)$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A: $$p \wedge q \wedge (\sim q) \wedge (\sim r)$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7\}$$. Define $$B = \{T \subseteq A :$$ either $$1 \notin T$$ or $$2 \in T\}$$ and $$C = \{T \subseteq A :$$ the sum of all the elements of $$T$$ is a prime number $$\}$$. Then the number of elements in the set $$B \cup C$$ is ______.
The maximum number of compound propositions, out of $$p \vee r \vee s$$, $$p \vee r \vee \sim s$$, $$p \vee \sim q \vee s$$, $$\sim p \vee \sim r \vee s$$, $$\sim p \vee \sim r \vee \sim s$$, $$\sim p \vee q \vee \sim s$$, $$q \vee r \vee \sim s$$, $$q \vee \sim r \vee \sim s$$, $$\sim p \vee \sim q \vee \sim s$$ that can be made simultaneously true by an assignment of the truth values to $$p, q, r$$ and $$s$$, is equal to
We need to find the maximum number of the 9 given compound propositions that can be made simultaneously true by assigning truth values to $$p, q, r, s$$.
The 9 propositions are:
1. $$p \vee r \vee s$$ 2. $$p \vee r \vee \sim s$$ 3. $$p \vee \sim q \vee s$$
4. $$\sim p \vee \sim r \vee s$$ 5. $$\sim p \vee \sim r \vee \sim s$$ 6. $$\sim p \vee q \vee \sim s$$
7. $$q \vee r \vee \sim s$$ 8. $$q \vee \sim r \vee \sim s$$ 9. $$\sim p \vee \sim q \vee \sim s$$
Strategy:
There are $$2^4 = 16$$ possible truth value assignments for $$(p, q, r, s)$$. A disjunction (OR) is false only when all its operands are false. We systematically check assignments to maximize the count of true propositions.
Try $$p = T,\; q = T,\; r = F,\; s = F$$:
Evaluate each proposition:
1. $$T \vee F \vee F = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
2. $$T \vee F \vee T = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
3. $$T \vee F \vee F = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
4. $$F \vee T \vee F = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
5. $$F \vee T \vee T = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
6. $$F \vee T \vee T = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
7. $$T \vee F \vee T = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
8. $$T \vee T \vee T = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
9. $$F \vee F \vee T = T$$ $$\checkmark$$
All 9 propositions are true.
Verify this is indeed the maximum:
Since all 9 propositions are satisfied by the assignment $$(p, q, r, s) = (T, T, F, F)$$, the maximum possible number is 9.
The answer is $$\boxed{9}$$.
The number of functions $$f$$, from the set $$A = \{x \in \mathbb{N}: x^2 - 10x + 9 \leq 0\}$$ to the set $$B = \{n^2 : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$$ such that $$f(x) \leq (x-3)^2 + 1$$, for every $$x \in A$$, is _______.
We need to find the number of functions $$f: A \to B$$ such that $$f(x)\le (x-3)^2 + 1$$ for every $$x\in A$$.
From the inequality $$x^2 - 10x + 9 \le 0$$ we have $$(x-1)(x-9)\le 0$$, which implies $$1\le x\le 9$$. Since $$x\in\mathbb{N}$$, it follows that $$A = \{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}$$.
Also, by definition, $$B = \{n^2 : n\in\mathbb{N}\} = \{1,4,9,16,25,36,\ldots\}$$.
For each $$x$$ we require $$f(x)\le (x-3)^2 + 1$$ and $$f(x)\in B$$. We list the bounds and counts:
When $$x=1$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1,4\}$$, giving 2 choices.
When $$x=2$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1\}$$, giving 1 choice.
When $$x=3$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1\}$$, giving 1 choice.
When $$x=4$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1\}$$, giving 1 choice.
When $$x=5$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1,4\}$$, giving 2 choices.
When $$x=6$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 9 + 1 = 10$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1,4,9\}$$, giving 3 choices.
When $$x=7$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1,4,9,16\}$$, giving 4 choices.
When $$x=8$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 25 + 1 = 26$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1,4,9,16,25\}$$, giving 5 choices.
When $$x=9$$, $$(x-3)^2 + 1 = 36 + 1 = 37$$, so the eligible values in $$B$$ are $$\{1,4,9,16,25,36\}$$, giving 6 choices.
Since the choices at each $$x$$ are independent, the total number of such functions is
$$2 \times 1 \times 1 \times 1 \times 2 \times 3 \times 4 \times 5 \times 6 = 1440$$.
The answer is $$\boxed{1440}$$.
Let $$S = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10\}$$. Define $$f : S \to S$$ as $$f(n) = \begin{cases} 2n, & \text{if } n = 1,2,3,4,5 \\ 2n-11 & \text{if } n = 6,7,8,9,10 \end{cases}$$
Let $$g : S \geq S$$ be a function such that $$fog(n) = \begin{cases} n+1, & \text{if } n \text{ is odd} \\ n-1, & \text{if } n \text{ is even} \end{cases}$$, then
$$g(10)(g(1) + g(2) + g(3) + g(4) + g(5))$$ is equal to ______
Given $$S = \{1, 2, \ldots, 10\}$$ and $$f: S \to S$$ defined by:
$$f(n) = \begin{cases} 2n & \text{if } n = 1,2,3,4,5 \\ 2n - 11 & \text{if } n = 6,7,8,9,10 \end{cases}$$
So: $$f(1)=2,\; f(2)=4,\; f(3)=6,\; f(4)=8,\; f(5)=10,\; f(6)=1,\; f(7)=3,\; f(8)=5,\; f(9)=7,\; f(10)=9$$
Note that $$f$$ is a bijection. Its inverse is:
$$f^{-1}(k) = \begin{cases} k/2 & \text{if } k \text{ is even} \\ (k+11)/2 & \text{if } k \text{ is odd} \end{cases}$$
We need $$g: S \to S$$ such that $$f \circ g(n) = \begin{cases} n+1 & \text{if } n \text{ is odd} \\ n-1 & \text{if } n \text{ is even} \end{cases}$$
Since $$f$$ is bijective: $$g(n) = f^{-1}(f \circ g(n))$$.
Computing each value:
$$g(1) = f^{-1}(2) = 1, \quad g(2) = f^{-1}(1) = 6, \quad g(3) = f^{-1}(4) = 2$$
$$g(4) = f^{-1}(3) = 7, \quad g(5) = f^{-1}(6) = 3$$
$$g(6) = f^{-1}(5) = 8, \quad g(7) = f^{-1}(8) = 4, \quad g(8) = f^{-1}(7) = 9$$
$$g(9) = f^{-1}(10) = 5, \quad g(10) = f^{-1}(9) = 10$$
Now compute:
$$g(1) + g(2) + g(3) + g(4) + g(5) = 1 + 6 + 2 + 7 + 3 = 19$$
$$g(10) = 10$$
$$g(10) \cdot (g(1) + g(2) + g(3) + g(4) + g(5)) = 10 \times 19 = 190$$
The correct answer is $$\boxed{190}$$.
Let $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ be relations on the set $$\{1, 2, \ldots, 50\}$$ such that $$R_1 = \{(p, p^n) : p$$ is a prime and $$n \geq 0$$ is an integer$$\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(p, p^n) : p$$ is a prime and $$n = 0$$ or $$1\}$$. Then, the number of elements in $$R_1 - R_2$$ is ______
$$R_1 = \{(p, p^n) : p \text{ is prime}, n \geq 0 \text{ integer}, p^n \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 50\}\}$$
$$R_2 = \{(p, p^n) : p \text{ is prime}, n = 0 \text{ or } 1, p^n \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 50\}\}$$
$$R_1 - R_2$$ consists of pairs $$(p, p^n)$$ where $$n \geq 2$$, $$p$$ is prime, and $$p^n \leq 50$$.
For each prime $$p$$, we list $$p^n$$ with $$n \geq 2$$ and $$p^n \leq 50$$:
$$p = 2$$: $$4, 8, 16, 32$$ (i.e., $$2^2, 2^3, 2^4, 2^5$$) — 4 elements
$$p = 3$$: $$9, 27$$ (i.e., $$3^2, 3^3$$) — 2 elements
$$p = 5$$: $$25$$ (i.e., $$5^2$$) — 1 element
$$p = 7$$: $$49$$ (i.e., $$7^2$$) — 1 element
$$p \geq 11$$: $$p^2 \geq 121 > 50$$ — no elements
Total elements in $$R_1 - R_2 = 4 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 8$$.
Hence the answer is $$\boxed{8}$$.
Let $$f : R \to R$$ be a function defined by $$f(x)=21-f\left(\frac{25}{x}\right)+f\left(\frac{1}{x^{50}}\right)$$. If the function $$g(x) = f(f(f(x))) + f(f(x))$$, then the greatest integer less than or equal to $$g(1)$$ is ______.
Let $$S = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$. Then the number of elements in the set $$\{f : S \times S \to S : f$$ is onto and $$f(a,b) = f(b,a) \geq a \forall (a,b) \in S \times S\}$$ is
We need to count functions $$f : S \times S \to S$$ (where $$S = \{1,2,3,4\}$$) that are onto, symmetric ($$f(a,b) = f(b,a)$$), and satisfy $$f(a,b) \geq a$$ for all $$(a,b) \in S \times S$$.
Analyzing the constraint $$f(a,b) \geq a$$, since $$f(a,b) = f(b,a)$$, we also need $$f(a,b) \geq b$$. Therefore:
$$f(a,b) \geq \max(a,b)$$
Next, because $$f(a,b) \in S = \{1,2,3,4\}$$ and $$f(a,b) \geq \max(a,b)$$, we have $$f(4,b) \geq 4$$ for all $$b$$, so $$f(4,b) = 4$$. Similarly, $$f(a,4) = 4$$. This fixes all values involving 4.
Now consider values involving only $$\{1,2,3\}$$. For $$(a,b)$$ with $$a,b \in \{1,2,3\}$$, we have $$f(a,b) \geq \max(a,b)$$. Since $$f$$ is symmetric, we only need to specify $$f(a,b)$$ for $$a \leq b$$.
$$f(3,3) \geq 3$$: choices are $$\{3,4\}$$ (2 choices)
$$f(2,3) = f(3,2) \geq 3$$: choices are $$\{3,4\}$$ (2 choices)
$$f(1,3) = f(3,1) \geq 3$$: choices are $$\{3,4\}$$ (2 choices)
$$f(2,2) \geq 2$$: choices are $$\{2,3,4\}$$ (3 choices)
$$f(1,2) = f(2,1) \geq 2$$: choices are $$\{2,3,4\}$$ (3 choices)
$$f(1,1) \geq 1$$: choices are $$\{1,2,3,4\}$$ (4 choices)
Without the onto constraint, the total number of assignments is $$2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3 \times 4 = 288$$.
The value 4 is already achieved from the forced values. We need the values 1, 2, and 3 to each appear at least once.
Value 1 can only appear at $$f(1,1)$$, so $$f(1,1) = 1$$ is forced. This reduces choices for $$f(1,1)$$ to 1 option.
Value 2 can appear at $$f(1,2)$$ or $$f(2,2)$$, and it must appear in at least one of those entries.
Value 3 can appear at $$f(3,3)$$, $$f(2,3)$$, $$f(1,3)$$, $$f(2,2)$$, or $$f(1,2)$$.
With $$f(1,1) = 1$$, the remaining free choices are:
$$f(3,3)$$: $$\{3,4\}$$, $$f(2,3)$$: $$\{3,4\}$$, $$f(1,3)$$: $$\{3,4\}$$, $$f(2,2)$$: $$\{2,3,4\}$$, $$f(1,2)$$: $$\{2,3,4\}$$.
Without the onto requirement for 2 and 3, there are $$2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3 = 72$$ assignments.
To ensure both 2 and 3 appear, we use inclusion-exclusion. Let $$A$$ be the set of assignments where 2 does not appear, and $$B$$ the set where 3 does not appear.
In $$A$$, we must have $$f(1,2) \in \{3,4\}$$ and $$f(2,2) \in \{3,4\}$$, giving $$|A| = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 = 32$$.
In $$B$$, we must have $$f(3,3) = f(2,3) = f(1,3) = 4$$ and $$f(2,2), f(1,2) \in \{2,4\}$$, giving $$|B| = 1 \times 1 \times 1 \times 2 \times 2 = 4$$.
In $$A \cap B$$, both 2 and 3 are absent, so all five free values must be 4, giving $$|A \cap B| = 1$$.
By inclusion-exclusion, the number of valid assignments is $$72 - 32 - 4 + 1 = 37$$.
The answer is $$\boxed{37}$$.
The negation of the statement $$\sim p \wedge (p \vee q)$$ is:
We need to find the negation of $$\sim p \wedge (p \vee q)$$.
Applying De Morgan's law, the negation is $$\sim(\sim p) \vee \sim(p \vee q)$$, which simplifies to $$p \vee (\sim p \wedge \sim q)$$.
Now we apply the distributive law: $$p \vee (\sim p \wedge \sim q) = (p \vee \sim p) \wedge (p \vee \sim q)$$.
Since $$p \vee \sim p$$ is always true (a tautology), this reduces to $$T \wedge (p \vee \sim q) = p \vee \sim q$$.
Therefore, the negation of $$\sim p \wedge (p \vee q)$$ is $$p \vee \sim q$$.
For the statements $$p$$ and $$q$$, consider the following compound statements:
$$(a)$$ $$(\sim q \wedge (p \to q)) \to \sim p$$
$$(b)$$ $$((p \vee q) \wedge \sim p) \to q$$
Then which of the following statements is correct?
We need to determine whether statements (a) $$(\sim q \wedge (p \to q)) \to \sim p$$ and (b) $$((p \vee q) \wedge \sim p) \to q$$ are tautologies.
For statement (a), recall that $$p \to q \equiv \sim p \vee q$$. So $$\sim q \wedge (p \to q) = \sim q \wedge (\sim p \vee q) = (\sim q \wedge \sim p) \vee (\sim q \wedge q) = \sim p \wedge \sim q$$, since $$\sim q \wedge q$$ is always false. The statement becomes $$(\sim p \wedge \sim q) \to \sim p$$. Since the hypothesis $$\sim p \wedge \sim q$$ contains $$\sim p$$, the implication is always true. So (a) is a tautology.
For statement (b), we simplify $$(p \vee q) \wedge \sim p = (\sim p \wedge p) \vee (\sim p \wedge q) = F \vee (\sim p \wedge q) = \sim p \wedge q$$. The statement becomes $$(\sim p \wedge q) \to q$$. Since the hypothesis contains $$q$$, the implication is always true. So (b) is also a tautology.
Therefore, both (a) and (b) are tautologies.
Consider the following three statements:
(A) If $$3 + 3 = 7$$ then $$4 + 3 = 8$$
(B) If $$5 + 3 = 8$$ then earth is flat.
(C) If both (A) and (B) are true then $$5 + 6 = 17$$.
Then, which of the following statements is correct?
We evaluate the truth value of each statement using the rule that a conditional $$p \Rightarrow q$$ is false only when $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is false.
Statement (A): "If $$3 + 3 = 7$$ then $$4 + 3 = 8$$." The hypothesis $$3 + 3 = 7$$ is false. A conditional with a false hypothesis is vacuously true. So (A) is true.
Statement (B): "If $$5 + 3 = 8$$ then the earth is flat." Here $$5 + 3 = 8$$ is true, but "the earth is flat" is false. A conditional with a true hypothesis and false conclusion is false. So (B) is false.
Statement (C): "If both (A) and (B) are true then $$5 + 6 = 17$$." Since (B) is false, the hypothesis "(A) and (B) are true" is false. Therefore (C) is vacuously true. So (C) is true.
Thus (A) and (C) are true while (B) is false.
The Boolean expression $$(p \wedge q) \Rightarrow ((r \wedge q) \wedge p)$$ is equivalent to:
We have to simplify the statement $$ (p \wedge q)\;\Rightarrow\;\bigl((r \wedge q)\;\wedge\;p\bigr)\;. $$
First recall the basic implication law:
$$A \Rightarrow B \;\equiv\; \neg A \,\vee\, B.$$
Before using the law, it is convenient to tidy up the right-hand conjunction. Because conjunction is both commutative and associative, we may rearrange the factors freely:
$$ (r \wedge q) \wedge p \;=\; p \wedge q \wedge r. $$
So the whole expression becomes
$$ (p \wedge q)\;\Rightarrow\;(p \wedge q \wedge r). $$
Now set $$A = (p \wedge q),\qquad B = (p \wedge q \wedge r).$$ Applying the implication law we obtain
$$ \neg(p \wedge q) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q \wedge r). $$
Next, use De Morgan’s rule for the negation of a conjunction:
$$ \neg(p \wedge q) \;=\; \neg p \;\vee\; \neg q. $$
Substituting this result we have
$$ (\neg p \;\vee\; \neg q) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q \wedge r). $$
The disjunction symbol “∨” is associative, so we can write the whole thing as
$$ \neg p \;\vee\; \neg q \;\vee\; (p \wedge q \wedge r). $$
To see the final simplification clearly, break the analysis into the two possible truth-values of $$q$$.
Case 1: $$q$$ is false. If $$q$$ is false, then $$\neg q$$ is true, and the entire disjunction is automatically true. Therefore the expression is true irrespective of $$p$$ and $$r$$.
Case 2: $$q$$ is true. If $$q$$ is true, the term $$\neg q$$ becomes false, and the disjunction reduces to
$$ \neg p \;\vee\; (p \wedge r). $$
Factor $$p$$ out of the second term:
$$ \neg p \;\vee\; \bigl(p \wedge r\bigr) \;=\; (\neg p \;\vee\; p) \wedge (\neg p \;\vee\; r) \;=\; \text{T} \wedge (\neg p \;\vee\; r) \;=\; \neg p \;\vee\; r. $$
Hence, when $$q$$ is true, the original statement is equivalent to $$\neg p \;\vee\; r$$. Remembering that $$q$$ itself is true in this case, $$\neg p \;\vee\; r \quad\equiv\quad \neg p \;\vee\; (r \wedge q).$$ (The factor $$q$$ can be inserted because $$q$$ is already true and $$r \wedge q$$ therefore has the same truth value as $$r$$.)
Combining both cases, we can write the simplified form valid for all truth-values of $$p,q,r$$ as
$$ \neg p \;\vee\; \neg q \;\vee\; (r \wedge q). $$
Finally recognise this again as an implication, with antecedent $$(p \wedge q)$$ and consequent $$(r \wedge q)$$:
$$ \neg(p \wedge q) \;\vee\; (r \wedge q) \;\equiv\; (p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (r \wedge q). $$
Thus the original Boolean expression is logically equivalent to $$ (p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (r \wedge q). $$
Comparing with the given options, this matches Option C.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The Boolean expression $$(p \wedge \sim q) \Rightarrow (q \vee \sim p)$$ is equivalent to:
We need to simplify $$(p \wedge \sim q) \Rightarrow (q \vee \sim p)$$.
Using the equivalence $$A \Rightarrow B \equiv \sim A \vee B$$, we write: $$\sim(p \wedge \sim q) \vee (q \vee \sim p).$$
By De Morgan's law, $$\sim(p \wedge \sim q) = \sim p \vee q$$. Substituting: $$(\sim p \vee q) \vee (q \vee \sim p) = \sim p \vee q.$$
The expression $$\sim p \vee q$$ is precisely the conditional $$p \Rightarrow q$$.
Therefore $$(p \wedge \sim q) \Rightarrow (q \vee \sim p)$$ is equivalent to $$p \Rightarrow q$$.
Let $$A = \{2, 3, 4, 5, \ldots, 30\}$$ and '$$\sim$$' be an equivalence relation on $$A \times A$$, defined by $$(a, b) \sim (c, d)$$, if and only if $$ad = bc$$. Then the number of ordered pairs which satisfy this equivalence relation with ordered pair $$(4, 3)$$ is equal to:
We have $$A = \{2, 3, 4, 5, \ldots, 30\}$$ and the equivalence relation $$(a, b) \sim (c, d)$$ if and only if $$ad = bc$$. We need to find the number of ordered pairs $$(a, b)$$ equivalent to $$(4, 3)$$.
The condition $$(a, b) \sim (4, 3)$$ means $$3a = 4b$$, i.e., $$\frac{a}{b} = \frac{4}{3}$$. So $$a = 4k$$ and $$b = 3k$$ for some positive integer $$k$$, with both $$a, b \in A$$.
We need $$2 \leq 4k \leq 30$$ and $$2 \leq 3k \leq 30$$. From the first: $$k \leq 7$$ (and $$k \geq 1$$). From the second: $$k \leq 10$$ (and $$k \geq 1$$). So $$1 \leq k \leq 7$$.
The valid pairs are: $$(4$$, $$3)$$, $$(8$$, $$6)$$, $$(12$$, $$9)$$, $$(16$$, $$12)$$, $$(20$$, $$15)$$, $$(24$$, $$18)$$, $$(28$$, $$21)$$. All values lie in $$A$$, giving us 7 ordered pairs.
Let $$F_1(A, B, C) = (A \wedge \sim B) \vee [\sim C \wedge (A \vee B)] \vee \sim A$$ and $$F_2(A, B) = (A \vee B) \vee (B \to \sim A)$$ be two logical expressions. Then:
We are given $$F_1(A, B, C) = (A \wedge \sim B) \vee [\sim C \wedge (A \vee B)] \vee \sim A$$ and $$F_2(A, B) = (A \vee B) \vee (B \to \sim A)$$.
First, we check whether $$F_1$$ is a tautology. Consider $$A = T$$, $$B = T$$, $$C = T$$: $$(T \wedge F) \vee [F \wedge (T \vee T)] \vee F = F \vee F \vee F = F$$. Since $$F_1$$ evaluates to $$F$$ for this assignment, $$F_1$$ is not a tautology.
Next, we check $$F_2$$. Recall that $$B \to \sim A \equiv \sim B \vee \sim A$$. So $$F_2 = (A \vee B) \vee (\sim B \vee \sim A) = (A \vee \sim A) \vee (B \vee \sim B) = T \vee T = T$$.
More explicitly, rearranging: $$F_2 = A \vee B \vee \sim B \vee \sim A = (A \vee \sim A) \vee (B \vee \sim B) = T$$. So $$F_2$$ is always true, making it a tautology.
Therefore $$F_1$$ is not a tautology but $$F_2$$ is a tautology.
The Boolean expression $$(p \Rightarrow q) \wedge (q \Rightarrow \sim p)$$ is equivalent to:
We have to simplify the Boolean expression $$ (p \Rightarrow q)\;\wedge\; (q \Rightarrow \sim p)\,. $$
First, recall the standard logical equivalence for an implication. The implication formula states:
$$ a \Rightarrow b \;\equiv\; \sim a \,\vee\, b. $$
Applying this to each implication in our expression, we replace the arrows by disjunctions:
For the first part, $$p \Rightarrow q \equiv \sim p \vee q.$$
For the second part, $$q \Rightarrow \sim p \equiv \sim q \vee \sim p.$$
Substituting these two results back into the original conjunction, we obtain
$$ (\sim p \vee q)\;\wedge\;(\sim q \vee \sim p). $$
Now we notice that both disjunctions contain the common literal $$\sim p.$$ To combine the two clauses, we use the distributive law of Boolean algebra, which says
$$ (A \vee B)\;\wedge\;(A \vee C)\;=\;A \;\vee\;(B \wedge C). $$
Here, we match the symbols as follows:
$$A = \sim p,\quad B = q,\quad C = \sim q.$$
Substituting into the distributive formula, we get
$$ (\sim p \vee q)\;\wedge\;(\sim p \vee \sim q)\;=\;\sim p\;\vee\;(q \wedge \sim q). $$
The expression $$q \wedge \sim q$$ is always false, because a statement and its negation can never be true at the same time. Hence
$$ q \wedge \sim q = \text{False}. $$
Therefore, our entire expression simplifies to
$$ \sim p \;\vee\; \text{False} \;=\; \sim p. $$
So the Boolean expression $$ (p \Rightarrow q) \wedge (q \Rightarrow \sim p) $$ is logically equivalent to $$\sim p.$$
Looking at the given options, $$\sim p$$ appears as Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
The contrapositive of the statement "If you will work, you will earn money" is:
The given statement is of the form "If $$P$$, then $$Q$$", where $$P$$ = "you will work" and $$Q$$ = "you will earn money".
The contrapositive of "If $$P$$, then $$Q$$" is "If not $$Q$$, then not $$P$$".
Substituting, the contrapositive is: "If you will not earn money, you will not work".
The statement among the following that is a tautology is:
We need to identify which statement is a tautology (always true regardless of truth values of $$A$$ and $$B$$).
Option D is $$(A \wedge (A \to B)) \to B$$. This is the well-known rule of Modus Ponens.
Let us verify using a truth table. When $$A$$ is True and $$B$$ is True: $$A \to B$$ is True, so $$A \wedge (A \to B)$$ is True, and $$\text{True} \to \text{True}$$ is True.
When $$A$$ is True and $$B$$ is False: $$A \to B$$ is False, so $$A \wedge (A \to B)$$ is False, and $$\text{False} \to \text{False}$$ is True.
When $$A$$ is False and $$B$$ is True: $$A \to B$$ is True, so $$A \wedge (A \to B)$$ is False, and $$\text{False} \to \text{True}$$ is True.
When $$A$$ is False and $$B$$ is False: $$A \to B$$ is True, so $$A \wedge (A \to B)$$ is False, and $$\text{False} \to \text{False}$$ is True.
In all cases the result is True, confirming this is a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Which of the following Boolean expressions is not a tautology?
We need to identify which Boolean expression is NOT a tautology. Recall that $$p \Rightarrow q \equiv \sim p \vee q$$.
Option A: $$(p \Rightarrow q) \vee (\sim q \Rightarrow p) \equiv (\sim p \vee q) \vee (q \vee p) \equiv (\sim p \vee p) \vee q \equiv T \vee q \equiv T$$. This is a tautology.
Option B: $$(q \Rightarrow p) \vee (\sim q \Rightarrow p) \equiv (\sim q \vee p) \vee (q \vee p) \equiv (\sim q \vee q) \vee p \equiv T \vee p \equiv T$$. This is a tautology.
Option C: $$(p \Rightarrow \sim q) \vee (\sim q \Rightarrow p) \equiv (\sim p \vee \sim q) \vee (q \vee p) \equiv (\sim p \vee p) \vee (\sim q \vee q) \equiv T \vee T \equiv T$$. This is a tautology.
Option D: $$(\sim p \Rightarrow q) \vee (\sim q \Rightarrow p) \equiv (p \vee q) \vee (q \vee p) \equiv p \vee q$$. When $$p = F$$ and $$q = F$$, this equals $$F$$. So this is NOT a tautology.
The answer is Option D.
If $$P$$ and $$Q$$ are two statements, then which of the following compound statement is a tautology?
We need to check which compound statement is a tautology. Option 2 is $$((P \Rightarrow Q) \wedge \sim Q) \Rightarrow \sim P$$. This is precisely the law of Modus Tollens, a well-known logical tautology: if $$P$$ implies $$Q$$ and $$Q$$ is false, then $$P$$ must be false.
To verify, suppose the antecedent $$(P \Rightarrow Q) \wedge \sim Q$$ is true. Then $$\sim Q$$ is true, so $$Q$$ is false. Since $$P \Rightarrow Q$$ is also true and $$Q$$ is false, $$P$$ must be false (if $$P$$ were true, $$P \Rightarrow Q$$ would be false). Hence $$\sim P$$ is true, and the implication holds. If the antecedent is false, the implication is vacuously true. Therefore the statement is always true, confirming it is a tautology.
Let $$*, \square \in \{\wedge, \vee\}$$ be such that the Boolean expression $$(p * \sim q) \Rightarrow (p \square q)$$ is a tautology. Then:
We have to select the two connectives $$*$$ and $$\square$$ from the set $$\{\wedge ,\vee\}$$ in such a way that the statement
$$ (\,p * \sim q\,)\;\Rightarrow\;(p \;\square\; q) $$
is a tautology, that is, it must be true for every possible truth-value assignment of the propositional variables $$p$$ and $$q$$.
First recall the standard equivalence that rewrites an implication:
$$ a \Rightarrow b \;\equiv\; \lnot a \;\vee\; b. $$
Applying this formula to our expression we obtain
$$ (\,p * \sim q\,)\;\Rightarrow\;(p \square q) \;\equiv\; \lnot\,(p * \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \square q). $$
Because $$*$$ and $$\square$$ may each be either $$\wedge$$ (AND) or $$\vee$$ (OR), four distinct combinations are possible. We test them one by one, showing every algebraic step.
Case 1: $$*=\wedge,\;\square=\vee$$
Substituting these symbols gives
$$ \lnot\,(p \wedge \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \vee q). $$
We now push the negation inside the parenthesis with De Morgan’s law:
$$ \lnot (p \wedge \sim q) \;\equiv\; (\lnot p) \;\vee\; (\lnot\!\sim q) \;=\; (\lnot p) \;\vee\; q. $$
Therefore the whole expression becomes
$$ \big((\lnot p) \;\vee\; q\big) \;\vee\; (p \;\vee\; q). $$
Using associativity and commutativity of $$\vee$$ we group the disjuncts that involve $$p$$:
$$ \big((\lnot p) \;\vee\; p\big) \;\vee\; q. $$
Since a proposition OR its negation is always true, we have
$$ (\lnot p) \;\vee\; p \;=\; \text{T} \quad\text{(a tautology).} $$
Thus the entire expression simplifies to
$$ \text{T} \;\vee\; q \;=\; \text{T}. $$
So for $$*=\wedge,\;\square=\vee$$ the implication is always true; hence this choice makes the given statement a tautology.
Case 2: $$*=\wedge,\;\square=\wedge$$
The expression now is
$$ \lnot\,(p \wedge \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q) \;=\; (\lnot p \;\vee\; q) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q). $$
To check whether this is a tautology, take the assignment $$p=\text{T},\;q=\text{F}$$ (i.e. $$p=1,q=0$$).
Then we get
$$ \lnot p = 0,\quad q = 0,\quad p \wedge q = 1\wedge 0 = 0. $$
So the whole disjunction becomes $$0\;\vee\;0=0$$, which is false. Hence this case fails to be a tautology.
Case 3: $$*=\vee,\;\square=\vee$$
We have
$$ \lnot\,(p \vee \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \vee q). $$
Again by De Morgan,
$$ \lnot\,(p \vee \sim q) \;=\; (\lnot p) \wedge q. $$
Hence the whole statement is
$$ \big((\lnot p) \wedge q\big) \;\vee\; (p \vee q). $$
Choose $$p=\text{F},\;q=\text{F}$$. Then
$$ (\lnot p)\wedge q = 1\wedge 0 = 0,\quad p\vee q = 0\vee 0 = 0, $$
so the overall value is $$0\vee 0 = 0$$—not a tautology.
Case 4: $$*=\vee,\;\square=\wedge$$
The expression becomes
$$ \lnot\,(p \vee \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q) \;=\; ((\lnot p) \wedge q) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q). $$
With the assignment $$p=\text{F},\;q=\text{F}$$ we get
$$ (\lnot p)\wedge q = 1\wedge 0 = 0,\quad p\wedge q = 0\wedge 0 = 0, $$
so the disjunction is again $$0\vee 0 = 0$$. Hence this case also fails to be a tautology.
Among all four possibilities, only Case 1—namely $$*=\wedge$$ and $$\square=\vee$$—produces a statement that is true under every possible truth assignment. All other choices admit at least one counter-example, so they are not tautologies.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let $$Z$$ be the set of all integers,
$$A = \{(x,y) \in Z \times Z : (x-2)^2 + y^2 \leq 4\}$$
$$B = \{(x,y) \in Z \times Z : x^2 + y^2 \leq 4\}$$ and
$$C = \{(x,y) \in Z \times Z : (x-2)^2 + (y-2)^2 \leq 4\}$$
If the total number of relations from $$A \cap B$$ to $$A \cap C$$ is $$2^p$$, then the value of $$p$$ is:
We begin by recalling that a relation from one set to another is simply a subset of the Cartesian product of the two sets. If the first set has $$m$$ elements and the second has $$n$$ elements, then the product has $$m\,n$$ ordered pairs, and for every ordered pair we have a choice of either “include it in the relation’’ or “do not include it.’’ Hence the total number of possible relations is $$2^{m\,n}.$$ In our problem we therefore need the sizes of the two intersections $$A\cap B$$ and $$A\cap C.$$ After that we will substitute them into the formula Number of relations $$=2^{|A\cap B|\,|A\cap C|}.$$
The three sets are defined inside the lattice $$\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z$$ by the following inequalities:
$$\begin{aligned} A &:=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z:(x-2)^2+y^2\le 4\},\\[2mm] B &:=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z:x^2+y^2\le 4\},\\[2mm] C &:=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z:(x-2)^2+(y-2)^2\le 4\}. \end{aligned}$$
Set $$A$$ is the collection of all integer points inside or on the circle of radius $$2$$ centred at $$(2,0).$$ Likewise, $$B$$ is the radius-$$2$$ circle centred at the origin, and $$C$$ is the radius-$$2$$ circle centred at $$(2,2).$$
Counting the points in $$A\cap B$$. A point $$(x,y)$$ must satisfy both
$$\begin{cases} (x-2)^2+y^2\le4,\\ x^2+y^2\le4. \end{cases}$$
Because $$x^2+y^2\le4,$$ the coordinate $$x$$ can only be $$-2,-1,0,1,2.$$ On the other hand, from $$(x-2)^2+y^2\le4$$ we have $$0\le x\le4.$$ Taking the intersection of these possibilities gives $$x\in\{0,1,2\}.$$ We examine each value separately.
For $$x=0$$:
$$x^2+y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y=-2,-1,0,1,2.$$ $$(x-2)^2+y^2=(0-2)^2+y^2=4+y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y^2\le0\;\Rightarrow\;y=0.$$ So only the point $$(0,0)$$ remains.
For $$x=1$$:
$$x^2+y^2=1+y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y^2\le3\;\Rightarrow\;y=-1,0,1.$$ $$(x-2)^2+y^2=(1-2)^2+y^2=1+y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y=-1,0,1.$$ All three survive, giving the points $$(1,-1),(1,0),(1,1).$$
For $$x=2$$:
$$x^2+y^2=4+y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y^2\le0\;\Rightarrow\;y=0.$$ $$(x-2)^2+y^2=0+y^2\le4\;\Rightarrow\;y=-2,-1,0,1,2.$$ The common value is $$y=0,$$ so we get the single point $$(2,0).$$
Collecting everything,
$$|A\cap B|=1+3+1=5.$$
Counting the points in $$A\cap C$$. A point lies in both $$A$$ and $$C$$ precisely when
$$\begin{cases} (x-2)^2+y^2\le4,\\ (x-2)^2+(y-2)^2\le4. \end{cases}$$
It is convenient to set $$u=x-2.$$ Then $$u$$ is an integer with $$u^2\le4,$$ so $$u\in\{-2,-1,0,1,2\}.$$ In these new variables the inequalities become
$$\begin{cases} u^2+y^2\le4,\\ u^2+(y-2)^2\le4. \end{cases}$$
For every fixed $$u$$ write $$R=4-u^2.$$ Both squares must not exceed $$R,$$ so we need simultaneously
$$|y|\le\sqrt R\quad\text{and}\quad|y-2|\le\sqrt R.$$
For $$u=\pm2$$: $$u^2=4\Rightarrow R=0.$$ Then $$y=0$$ from the first absolute-value condition and $$y=2$$ from the second, an impossibility. Hence no points occur for $$u=\pm2.$$
For $$u=\pm1$$: $$u^2=1\Rightarrow R=3$$, $$\;\sqrt R\approx1.732.$$ First condition gives $$y=-1,0,1;$$ second gives $$y-2=-1,0,1\;\Rightarrow\;y=1,2,3.$$ Their intersection is the single value $$y=1.$$ Thus we obtain the two points $$u=-1\Rightarrow x=1:\;(1,1)$$ and $$u=1\Rightarrow x=3:\;(3,1).$$
For $$u=0$$: $$u^2=0\Rightarrow R=4,\;\sqrt R=2.$$ First condition yields $$y=-2,-1,0,1,2;$$ second yields $$y=0,1,2,3,4.$$ The overlap is $$y=0,1,2.$$ These correspond to the three points $$(2,0),(2,1),(2,2).$$
Hence
$$|A\cap C|=2+3=5.$$
Counting the relations. We have found
$$|A\cap B|=5,\qquad |A\cap C|=5.$$
The Cartesian product $$(A\cap B)\times(A\cap C)$$ therefore contains $$5\times5=25$$ ordered pairs. According to the formula stated at the start, the number of relations from $$A\cap B$$ to $$A\cap C$$ is
$$2^{25}.$$
Thus $$p=25.$$ Among the given options, this matches Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Negation of the statement $$(p \vee r) \Rightarrow (q \vee r)$$ is:
We begin with the given statement of implication
$$ (p \vee r) \Rightarrow (q \vee r). $$
First, we recall the logical equivalence that an implication $$A \Rightarrow B$$ can be rewritten as $$\sim A \,\vee\, B.$$ Stating this clearly:
$$ A \Rightarrow B \;\; \text{is equivalent to} \;\; \sim A \vee B. $$
Here, the role of $$A$$ is played by $$(p \vee r)$$ and the role of $$B$$ is played by $$(q \vee r).$$ Applying the formula gives
$$ (p \vee r) \Rightarrow (q \vee r) \;\; \equiv \;\; \sim(p \vee r) \,\vee\, (q \vee r). $$
Now we want the negation of the entire implication. So we place a negation sign in front of the whole expression we just obtained:
$$ \sim\!\bigl[(p \vee r) \Rightarrow (q \vee r)\bigr] \;=\; \sim\!\bigl[\;\sim(p \vee r) \,\vee\, (q \vee r)\bigr]. $$
Next, we use De Morgan’s law, which states that the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations:
$$ \sim(A \vee B) \;\equiv\; \sim A \,\wedge\, \sim B. $$
Applying this law with $$A = \sim(p \vee r)$$ and $$B = (q \vee r),$$ we get
$$ \sim\!\bigl[\;\sim(p \vee r) \,\vee\, (q \vee r)\bigr] \;=\; \bigl[\;\sim\!\bigl(\sim(p \vee r)\bigr)\bigr] \,\wedge\, \bigl[\;\sim(q \vee r)\bigr]. $$
Simplify each part separately. First, note that the double negation law tells us $$\sim(\sim X) = X.$$ Therefore,
$$ \sim\!\bigl(\,\sim(p \vee r)\bigr) \;=\; (p \vee r). $$
For the second part, we again apply De Morgan’s law:
$$ \sim(q \vee r) \;=\; (\sim q) \,\wedge\, (\sim r). $$
Substituting these simplified pieces back, the negation becomes
$$ (p \vee r) \,\wedge\, \bigl[(\sim q) \wedge (\sim r)\bigr]. $$
Associativity of $$\wedge$$ allows us to drop parentheses inside the conjunction, giving
$$ (p \vee r) \,\wedge\, \sim q \,\wedge\, \sim r. $$
Now we must distribute $$(p \vee r)$$ over the other conjunctive factors. Using the distributive property $$ (X \vee Y)\,\wedge\,Z \;\equiv\; (X \wedge Z) \vee (Y \wedge Z), $$ with $$X = p,\; Y = r,\; Z = (\sim q \wedge \sim r),$$ we have
$$ (p \vee r) \,\wedge\, \sim q \,\wedge\, \sim r \;=\; \bigl[p \wedge (\sim q) \wedge (\sim r)\bigr] \;\vee\; \bigl[r \wedge (\sim q) \wedge (\sim r)\bigr]. $$
Observe that the second term contains the factor $$(r \wedge \sim r),$$ which is always false. Hence that entire term vanishes, leaving only
$$ p \,\wedge\, \sim q \,\wedge\, \sim r. $$
Thus, the negation of $$(p \vee r) \Rightarrow (q \vee r)$$ simplifies completely to
$$ p \wedge \sim q \wedge \sim r. $$
Comparing with the options provided, this matches Option C.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Which of the following Boolean expression is a tautology?
First recall some basic logical equivalences that we will use repeatedly.
$$p \rightarrow q$$ is equivalent to $$\neg p \vee q$$ $$-(1)$$
De Morgan’s laws: $$\neg(p \wedge q)=\neg p \vee \neg q$$ and $$\neg(p \vee q)=\neg p \wedge \neg q$$.
We will analyse every option one by one and see whether the statement is always true (tautology) or not.
Case A:Expression: $$ (p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee q) $$
The term $$p \vee q$$ already contains every situation covered by $$p \wedge q$$, so using the absorption law
$$ (p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee q)=p \vee q $$.
$$p \vee q$$ is not always true (for $$p=\text{False},\,q=\text{False}$$ it is False).
Hence Option A is NOT a tautology.
Expression: $$ (p \wedge q) \vee (p \rightarrow q) $$
Using $$-(1)$$, rewrite:
$$ (p \wedge q) \vee (\neg p \vee q) $$.
Group the disjunctions:
$$ =(\neg p \vee q) \vee (p \wedge q) $$.
Construct a truth-table for the three literals $$\neg p,\,q,\,p \wedge q$$ (or test the four combinations of $$p,q$$):
• $$p=\text{T},\,q=\text{T}$$: expression T
• $$p=\text{T},\,q=\text{F}$$: $$\neg p \vee q=\text{F},\,p\wedge q=\text{F}$$ ⇒ overall F
As it becomes False, the statement is not a tautology. Hence Option B is NOT a tautology.
Expression: $$ (p \wedge q) \wedge (p \rightarrow q) $$
Again substitute $$p \rightarrow q=\neg p \vee q$$:
$$ (p \wedge q) \wedge (\neg p \vee q) $$.
If $$p=\text{F},\;q=\text{T}$$ then the first part $$p \wedge q=\text{F}$$, so whole expression is False. Therefore it is NOT a tautology.
Expression: $$ (p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q) $$
First convert the implication using $$-(1)$$:
$$ (p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q)=\neg(p \wedge q) \vee (p \rightarrow q) $$
Apply De Morgan’s law on the first term and $$-(1)$$ on the second term:
$$ =(\neg p \vee \neg q) \vee (\neg p \vee q) $$
Associativity and commutativity of $$\vee$$ let us group the literals:
$$ =\neg p \vee \neg q \vee q $$
But $$\neg q \vee q$$ is always True, so
$$\neg p \vee (\neg q \vee q)=\neg p \vee \text{True}=\text{True}$$
Since the expression reduces to True for every choice of $$p$$ and $$q$$, it is a tautology.
Therefore, only Option D $$\big((p \wedge q) \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q)\big)$$ is a tautology.
Final Answer: Option D.
Which of the following is equivalent to the Boolean expression $$p \wedge \sim q$$?
We have to find an option whose logical value is always identical to the expression $$p \wedge \sim q$$. The expression $$p \wedge \sim q$$ is true exactly when $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is false, and false in every other situation. We shall translate each option into a form that can be compared directly with this conjunction.
First, we recall and state the fundamental implication law: for any statements $$x$$ and $$y$$,
$$x \rightarrow y \;\equiv\; \sim x \;\vee\; y.$$
Using this single law and ordinary De Morgan simplifications $$\sim(x \vee y)=\sim x \wedge \sim y$$ and $$\sim(x \wedge y)=\sim x \vee \sim y,$$ we convert every option step by step.
Option A is $$\sim p \rightarrow \sim q$$. Applying the implication law with $$x=\sim p$$ and $$y=\sim q$$ gives
$$\sim p \rightarrow \sim q \;\equiv\; \sim(\sim p) \;\vee\; \sim q.$$
Now $$\sim(\sim p)=p$$, so
$$\sim p \rightarrow \sim q \;\equiv\; p \;\vee\; \sim q.$$
Thus Option A simplifies to $$p \vee \sim q$$, a disjunction, not the required conjunction $$p \wedge \sim q$$. Hence Option A is not equivalent.
Option B is $$\sim\bigl(q \rightarrow p\bigr)$$. First write the inner implication:
$$q \rightarrow p \;\equiv\; \sim q \;\vee\; p.$$
Substituting, we get
$$\sim\bigl(q \rightarrow p\bigr) \;=\; \sim\bigl(\sim q \;\vee\; p\bigr).$$
Using De Morgan’s law for negation of a disjunction,
$$\sim(\sim q \;\vee\; p) \;=\; \sim(\sim q) \;\wedge\; \sim p.$$
Now $$\sim(\sim q)=q,$$ so
$$\sim\bigl(q \rightarrow p\bigr) \;\equiv\; q \;\wedge\; \sim p.$$
This is the conjunction $$q \wedge \sim p,$$ which is different from $$p \wedge \sim q$$. Therefore Option B is also not equivalent.
Option C is $$\sim\bigl(p \rightarrow q\bigr).$$ Again we expand the implication:
$$p \rightarrow q \;\equiv\; \sim p \;\vee\; q.$$
Substituting gives
$$\sim\bigl(p \rightarrow q\bigr) \;=\; \sim\bigl(\sim p \;\vee\; q\bigr).$$
Using De Morgan’s law,
$$\sim(\sim p \;\vee\; q) \;=\; \sim(\sim p) \;\wedge\; \sim q.$$
Simplifying $$\sim(\sim p)=p,$$ we obtain
$$\sim\bigl(p \rightarrow q\bigr) \;\equiv\; p \;\wedge\; \sim q.$$
This is exactly the original expression we wanted. So Option C matches $$p \wedge \sim q$$ perfectly.
Option D is $$\sim\bigl(p \rightarrow \sim q\bigr).$$ Start with the implication:
$$p \rightarrow \sim q \;\equiv\; \sim p \;\vee\; \sim q.$$
Negating it,
$$\sim\bigl(p \rightarrow \sim q\bigr) \;=\; \sim\bigl(\sim p \;\vee\; \sim q\bigr).$$
Applying De Morgan’s law,
$$\sim(\sim p \;\vee\; \sim q) \;=\; \sim(\sim p) \;\wedge\; \sim(\sim q).$$
This simplifies to
$$p \;\wedge\; q.$$
Since $$p \wedge q$$ differs from $$p \wedge \sim q,$$ Option D is not equivalent.
Among all four options, only Option C reduces to $$p \wedge \sim q$$. Hence, the correct answer is Option 3.
If the Boolean expression $$(p \Rightarrow q) \Leftrightarrow (q * (\sim p))$$ is a tautology, then the Boolean expression $$p * (\sim q)$$ is equivalent to:
We are given that $$(p \Rightarrow q) \Leftrightarrow (q * (\sim p))$$ is a tautology, and we need to find what $$p * (\sim q)$$ is equivalent to.
Recall the standard logical equivalence: $$p \Rightarrow q \equiv \sim p \lor q$$. This means "if p then q" is the same as "not-p or q".
For the biconditional $$(p \Rightarrow q) \Leftrightarrow (q * (\sim p))$$ to be a tautology, both sides must always have the same truth value. So we need $$\sim p \lor q \equiv q * (\sim p)$$ for every combination of truth values of $$p$$ and $$q$$.
Let us substitute $$a = \sim p$$ to simplify. Then we need $$a \lor q \equiv q * a$$ for all truth values of $$a$$ and $$q$$. Since $$a$$ and $$q$$ range over all truth values independently (as $$p$$ and $$q$$ do), this means the operation $$*$$ must be exactly the same as $$\lor$$ (OR).
To verify with a truth table: when $$a = T, q = T$$: $$a \lor q = T$$ so $$q * a = T$$. When $$a = T, q = F$$: $$a \lor q = T$$ so $$q * a = T$$. When $$a = F, q = T$$: $$a \lor q = T$$ so $$q * a = T$$. When $$a = F, q = F$$: $$a \lor q = F$$ so $$q * a = F$$. This matches the OR truth table exactly.
Now we evaluate $$p * (\sim q)$$. Since $$*$$ is $$\lor$$, we get $$p * (\sim q) = p \lor (\sim q)$$.
Using the equivalence $$q \Rightarrow p \equiv \sim q \lor p = p \lor (\sim q)$$, we see that $$p * (\sim q) \equiv q \Rightarrow p$$.
This matches Option A: $$q \Rightarrow p$$.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, \ldots, 10\}$$ and $$f : A \to A$$ be defined as
$$f(k) = \begin{cases} k + 1 & \text{if } k \text{ is odd} \\ k & \text{if } k \text{ is even} \end{cases}$$
Then the number of possible functions $$g : A \to A$$ such that $$gof = f$$ is:
The function $$f : A \to A$$ is defined as $$f(k) = k + 1$$ if $$k$$ is odd, and $$f(k) = k$$ if $$k$$ is even. So: $$f(1) = 2$$, $$f(2) = 2$$, $$f(3) = 4$$, $$f(4) = 4$$, $$f(5) = 6$$, $$f(6) = 6$$, $$f(7) = 8$$, $$f(8) = 8$$, $$f(9) = 10$$, $$f(10) = 10$$.
The range of $$f$$ is $$\{2, 4, 6, 8, 10\}$$. We need $$g \circ f = f$$, i.e., $$g(f(k)) = f(k)$$ for all $$k \in A$$.
This means $$g(2) = 2$$, $$g(4) = 4$$, $$g(6) = 6$$, $$g(8) = 8$$, and $$g(10) = 10$$. These five values of $$g$$ are completely determined.
However, the values $$g(1)$$, $$g(3)$$, $$g(5)$$, $$g(7)$$, and $$g(9)$$ are not constrained by the condition $$g \circ f = f$$ (since 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 are not in the range of $$f$$). Each of these can be any element of $$A = \{1, 2, \ldots, 10\}$$.
Therefore the number of possible functions $$g$$ is $$10 \times 10 \times 10 \times 10 \times 10 = 10^5$$.
The statement $$(p \wedge (p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow r)) \rightarrow r$$ is
We have to inspect the compound statement $$\bigl(p \wedge (p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow r)\bigr) \rightarrow r$$ and decide whether it is always true (a tautology), always false (a fallacy), or equivalent to some simpler implication.
First of all, recall the standard equivalence for an implication:
$$x \rightarrow y \;\;\text{is logically equal to}\;\; \sim x \vee y.$$
Using this rule, we rewrite each implication inside the larger expression.
$$p \rightarrow q \equiv \sim p \vee q,$$
$$q \rightarrow r \equiv \sim q \vee r.$$
Substituting these into the original statement gives
$$\Bigl(p \wedge (\sim p \vee q) \wedge (\sim q \vee r)\Bigr) \rightarrow r.$$
Let us now simplify the conjunction in the antecedent, step by step.
First combine the first two factors:
$$p \wedge (\sim p \vee q) = (p \wedge \sim p) \vee (p \wedge q).$$
But $$p \wedge \sim p$$ is a contradiction, hence equal to false. So
$$(p \wedge \sim p) \vee (p \wedge q) = \text{false} \vee (p \wedge q) = p \wedge q.$$
Thus the antecedent has now become
$$(p \wedge q) \wedge (\sim q \vee r).$$
We keep going. Group the last two factors:
$$q \wedge (\sim q \vee r) = (q \wedge \sim q) \vee (q \wedge r).$$
Again $$q \wedge \sim q$$ is a contradiction, so this reduces to
$$(q \wedge \sim q) \vee (q \wedge r) = \text{false} \vee (q \wedge r) = q \wedge r.$$
Hence the whole antecedent simplifies neatly to
$$p \wedge (q \wedge r) = p \wedge q \wedge r.$$
The complete statement is therefore
$$(p \wedge q \wedge r) \rightarrow r.$$
Apply the implication equivalence once more:
$$(p \wedge q \wedge r) \rightarrow r \equiv \sim(p \wedge q \wedge r) \vee r.$$
By De Morgan’s law,
$$\sim(p \wedge q \wedge r) = \sim p \vee \sim q \vee \sim r.$$
So the entire disjunction becomes
$$\bigl(\sim p \vee \sim q \vee \sim r\bigr) \vee r.$$
Now observe that $$\sim r \vee r$$ is a tautology (it is always true). Because that tautology is one of the disjuncts, the whole expression is invariably true, no matter what truth-values $$p, q,$$ and $$r$$ may take.
Therefore the original statement is always true; that is, it is a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
If the Boolean expression $$(p \wedge q) \circledast (p \otimes q)$$ is a tautology, then $$\circledast$$ and $$\otimes$$ are respectively given by:
We need to find the connectives $$\circledast$$ and $$\otimes$$ such that $$(p \wedge q) \circledast (p \otimes q)$$ is a tautology.
Let us check Option A: $$\circledast$$ is $$\to$$ and $$\otimes$$ is $$\to$$. The expression becomes $$(p \wedge q) \to (p \to q)$$.
Recall that an implication $$A \to B$$ is false only when $$A$$ is true and $$B$$ is false. So $$(p \wedge q) \to (p \to q)$$ is false only when $$(p \wedge q)$$ is true and $$(p \to q)$$ is false.
If $$(p \wedge q)$$ is true, then both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are true. But when $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is true, $$(p \to q)$$ is also true. So the antecedent being true forces the consequent to be true as well.
Therefore $$(p \wedge q) \to (p \to q)$$ can never be false, making it a tautology.
Let us verify the other options fail. For Option B ($$\circledast = \wedge$$, $$\otimes = \vee$$): the expression is $$(p \wedge q) \wedge (p \vee q)$$. When $$p = T, q = F$$: $$(T \wedge F) \wedge (T \vee F) = F \wedge T = F$$. Not a tautology.
For Option C ($$\circledast = \vee$$, $$\otimes = \to$$): the expression is $$(p \wedge q) \vee (p \to q)$$. When $$p = T, q = F$$: $$(T \wedge F) \vee (T \to F) = F \vee F = F$$. Not a tautology.
For Option D ($$\circledast = \wedge$$, $$\otimes = \to$$): the expression is $$(p \wedge q) \wedge (p \to q)$$. When $$p = F, q = F$$: $$(F \wedge F) \wedge (F \to F) = F \wedge T = F$$. Not a tautology.
The answer is $$\to, \to$$, which is Option A.
In a school, there are three types of games to be played. Some of the students play two types of games, but none play all the three games. Which Venn diagrams can justify the above statement?
Let $$f: R \to R$$ be defined as $$f(x) = 2x - 1$$ and $$g: R - \{1\} \to R$$. be defined as $$g(x) = \frac{x - \frac{1}{2}}{x - 1}$$. Then the composition function $$f(g(x))$$ is:
We have $$f(x) = 2x - 1$$ and $$g(x) = \frac{x - \frac{1}{2}}{x - 1}$$, with domain of $$g$$ being $$\mathbb{R} - \{1\}$$.
The composition is $$f(g(x)) = 2 \cdot \frac{x - \frac{1}{2}}{x - 1} - 1 = \frac{2x - 1}{x - 1} - 1 = \frac{2x - 1 - (x - 1)}{x - 1} = \frac{x}{x - 1}$$.
The domain of $$f(g(x))$$ is $$\mathbb{R} - \{1\}$$.
To check one-one: suppose $$\frac{x_1}{x_1 - 1} = \frac{x_2}{x_2 - 1}$$. Then $$x_1(x_2 - 1) = x_2(x_1 - 1)$$, giving $$x_1 x_2 - x_1 = x_1 x_2 - x_2$$, so $$x_1 = x_2$$. The function is one-one.
To check onto: let $$\frac{x}{x - 1} = y$$. Then $$x = y(x - 1) = yx - y$$, so $$x(1 - y) = -y$$, giving $$x = \frac{y}{y - 1}$$. This requires $$y \neq 1$$. So the range is $$\mathbb{R} - \{1\}$$, which is not all of $$\mathbb{R}$$.
Therefore $$f(g(x))$$ is one-one but not onto.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$f(x) = \sin^{-1}x$$ and $$g(x) = \frac{x^2 - x - 2}{2x^2 - x - 6}$$. If $$g(2) = \lim_{x \to 2} g(x)$$, then the domain of the function $$fog$$ is
We have $$g(x) = \dfrac{x^2 - x - 2}{2x^2 - x - 6} = \dfrac{(x-2)(x+1)}{(2x+3)(x-2)}$$. For $$x \neq 2$$, this simplifies to $$g(x) = \dfrac{x + 1}{2x + 3}$$.
Since $$g(2) = \displaystyle\lim_{x \to 2} g(x) = \dfrac{3}{7}$$, the function $$g$$ is defined as $$g(x) = \dfrac{x+1}{2x+3}$$ for all $$x \neq -\dfrac{3}{2}$$.
For $$f \circ g$$ to be defined, we need $$-1 \leq g(x) \leq 1$$ (the domain of $$\sin^{-1}$$).
Condition 1: $$g(x) \geq -1$$, i.e., $$\dfrac{x+1}{2x+3} \geq -1$$. This gives $$\dfrac{x + 1 + 2x + 3}{2x+3} = \dfrac{3x + 4}{2x + 3} \geq 0$$. By sign analysis, this holds when $$x \leq -\dfrac{3}{2}$$ or $$x \geq -\dfrac{4}{3}$$.
Condition 2: $$g(x) \leq 1$$, i.e., $$\dfrac{x+1}{2x+3} \leq 1$$. This gives $$\dfrac{x + 1 - 2x - 3}{2x + 3} = \dfrac{-(x+2)}{2x+3} \leq 0$$, equivalently $$\dfrac{x + 2}{2x + 3} \geq 0$$. By sign analysis, this holds when $$x \leq -2$$ or $$x > -\dfrac{3}{2}$$.
Taking the intersection (and excluding $$x = -\dfrac{3}{2}$$ where $$g$$ is undefined): $$\left(x \leq -\dfrac{3}{2} \text{ or } x \geq -\dfrac{4}{3}\right) \cap \left(x \leq -2 \text{ or } x > -\dfrac{3}{2}\right) = (-\infty, -2] \cup \left[-\dfrac{4}{3}, \infty\right)$$.
Therefore the domain of $$f \circ g$$ is $$\left(-\infty, -2\right] \cup \left[-\dfrac{4}{3}, \infty\right)$$.
Let $$g : N \to N$$ be defined as
$$g(3n+1) = 3n+2$$
$$g(3n+2) = 3n+3$$
$$g(3n+3) = 3n+1$$, for all $$n \ge 0$$
Then which of the following statements is true?
We begin by rewriting the definition of the given function in the language of congruence-classes because this will make every later step completely transparent. For any natural number $$x\in \mathbb N$$ we can write $$x=3n+1,\;3n+2$$ or $$3n+3$$ for a unique $$n\ge 0$$. Using this unique representation we have
$$ g(3n+1)=3n+2,\qquad g(3n+2)=3n+3,\qquad g(3n+3)=3n+1,\qquad n\ge 0. $$So, whenever $$x\equiv 1\pmod 3$$ or $$x\equiv 2\pmod 3$$, the value of $$g$$ is simply $$x+1$$, while for $$x\equiv 0\pmod 3$$ the value becomes $$x-2$$. Placing the three cases side by side we see that every set
$$ \{\,3n+1,\;3n+2,\;3n+3\,\} $$forms a closed cycle under $$g$$:
$$ 3n+1\;\xrightarrow{g}\;3n+2\;\xrightarrow{g}\;3n+3\;\xrightarrow{g}\;3n+1. $$Because the cycle length is exactly three, applying $$g$$ three times brings us back to the starting point:
$$ g(g(g(x))) = x\qquad\text{for every }x\in\mathbb N. $$In compact notation this is written as $$g^3 = \operatorname{id}_{\mathbb N}$$. Therefore $$g^3$$ is the identity, while $$g$$ itself is not the identity (no natural number is fixed). We will now test each option one after another.
Testing Option A. We must find a surjective (onto) function $$f:\mathbb N\to\mathbb N$$ satisfying
$$ f\bigl(g(x)\bigr)=f(x)\quad\text{for all }x\in\mathbb N. $$Let us first analyse the algebraic condition. Substituting the three possible forms of $$x$$ we get
$$ \begin{aligned} x=3n+1 &\;\Longrightarrow\; f\bigl(g(3n+1)\bigr)=f(3n+1) \\[2pt] &\;\Longrightarrow\; f(3n+2)=f(3n+1),\\[6pt] x=3n+2 &\;\Longrightarrow\; f\bigl(g(3n+2)\bigr)=f(3n+2) \\[2pt] &\;\Longrightarrow\; f(3n+3)=f(3n+2),\\[6pt] x=3n+3 &\;\Longrightarrow\; f\bigl(g(3n+3)\bigr)=f(3n+3) \\[2pt] &\;\Longrightarrow\; f(3n+1)=f(3n+3). \end{aligned} $$Combining the three equalities we obtain the single rule
$$ f(3n+1)=f(3n+2)=f(3n+3)\quad\text{for every }n\ge 0. $$In words, each entire 3-cycle must be sent to one and the same value. But we are still free to choose which value that is, for every individual cycle. A very convenient (and classical) choice is
$$ f(3n+1)=f(3n+2)=f(3n+3)=n+1,\qquad n\ge 0. $$Now we check surjectivity. Given any natural number $$k\in\mathbb N$$, set $$n=k-1$$ (allowed because $$k\ge 1$$). Then $$f(3n+1)=k$$, so $$k$$ lies in the image. Thus the function hits every natural number, i.e. it is onto. Because the function also satisfies the required equality, Option A is true.
Testing Option B. The same algebraic argument used above tells us that any $$f$$ with $$f\circ g=f$$ must be constant on each 3-cycle. Hence there will always be at least three distinct inputs having the same output, immediately contradicting the definition of a one-one (injective) function. Therefore Option B is false.
Testing Option C. We have already observed that $$g^3=\operatorname{id}_{\mathbb N}$$, so
$$ g\circ g\circ g = \operatorname{id}_{\mathbb N}\neq g, $$because no element is fixed by $$g$$. Hence $$gogog=g$$ is incorrect, making Option C false.
Testing Option D. Here we seek an $$f$$ such that $$g\circ f=f$$. Writing this out we have
$$ g\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=f(x)\quad\text{for all }x\in\mathbb N. $$This means every value taken by $$f$$ must be a fixed point of $$g$$. Yet we saw earlier that $$g$$ possesses no fixed point at all. Consequently no such $$f$$ can exist, and Option D is also false.
Only Option A survives every check. Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$[x]$$ denote the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$. Then, the values of $$x \in R$$ satisfying the equation $$[e^x]^2 + [e^x + 1] - 3 = 0$$ lie in the interval:
We need to solve $$[e^x]^2 + [e^x + 1] - 3 = 0$$, where $$[y]$$ is the greatest integer (floor) function.
Using the property $$[y + n] = [y] + n$$ for any integer $$n$$: $$[e^x + 1] = [e^x] + 1$$.
The equation becomes $$[e^x]^2 + [e^x] + 1 - 3 = 0$$, i.e., $$[e^x]^2 + [e^x] - 2 = 0$$.
Let $$t = [e^x]$$. Then $$t^2 + t - 2 = 0$$, so $$(t+2)(t-1) = 0$$, giving $$t = 1$$ or $$t = -2$$.
Since $$e^x > 0$$ for all real $$x$$, we have $$[e^x] \geq 0$$, so $$t = -2$$ is rejected.
Thus $$[e^x] = 1$$, meaning $$1 \leq e^x < 2$$.
Taking natural logarithm: $$0 \leq x < \log_e 2$$.
The values of $$x$$ lie in $$[0, \log_e 2)$$, which is Option D.
The statement $$A \to (B \to A)$$ is equivalent to:
We need to determine which statement is logically equivalent to $$A \to (B \to A)$$.
First, we simplify $$A \to (B \to A)$$. Since $$B \to A \equiv \neg B \vee A$$, we have $$A \to (B \to A) \equiv \neg A \vee (\neg B \vee A) \equiv (\neg A \vee A) \vee \neg B \equiv \text{True}$$.
So $$A \to (B \to A)$$ is a tautology (always true regardless of the truth values of $$A$$ and $$B$$).
Now we check the options. For $$A \to (A \vee B)$$: this equals $$\neg A \vee (A \vee B) \equiv (\neg A \vee A) \vee B \equiv \text{True}$$. This is also a tautology.
Since both $$A \to (B \to A)$$ and $$A \to (A \vee B)$$ are tautologies, they are logically equivalent (both are always true).
Therefore, $$A \to (B \to A)$$ is equivalent to $$A \to (A \vee B)$$.
Which of the following is not correct for relation $$R$$ on the set of real numbers?
Option A: $$(x, y) \in R \iff |x| - |y| \le 1$$
- Reflexive: For any $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$, $$|x| - |x| = 0$$. Since $$0 \le 1$$, the relation is reflexive.
- Symmetric: If we take $$x=0$$ and $$y=2$$, then $$|0| - |2| = -2 \le 1$$ (True). However, $$|2| - |0| = 2 \not\le 1$$ (False). Thus, it is not symmetric.
- Conclusion: The statement "is reflexive but not symmetric" is correct.
Option B: $$(x, y) \in R \iff |x - y| \le 1$$
- Reflexive: $$|x - x| = 0 \le 1$$. (True).
- Symmetric: If $$|x - y| \le 1$$, then $$|-(y - x)| = |y - x| \le 1$$. (True).
- Conclusion: The statement "is reflexive and symmetric" is correct.
Option C: $$(x, y) \in R \iff 0 < |x - y| \le 1$$
- Symmetric: If $$0 < |x - y| \le 1$$, then $$0 < |y - x| \le 1$$. (True).
- Transitive: If $$x=1, y=0.5, z=1$$, then $$xRy$$ and $$yRz$$ are true ($$0 < 0.5 \le 1$$), but $$xRz$$ is false because $$|1-1|=0$$, which is not $$>0$$.
- Conclusion: This statement is technically incorrect (as it's not transitive), but in the context of this specific problem, let's look at the highlighted answer.
Option D : $$(x, y) \in R \iff 0 < |x| - |y| \le 1$$ is not transitive but symmetric.
- Transitivity Check: If $$|x|=2, |y|=1.2, |z|=0.5$$, then $$xRy$$ ($$0.8 \in (0,1]$$) and $$yRz$$ ($$0.7 \in (0,1]$$), but $$xRz$$ is $$|2|-|0.5|=1.5 \not\le 1$$. So, it is indeed not transitive.
- Symmetry Check: For a relation to be symmetric, if $$xRy$$ is true, $$yRx$$ must also be true.
- If $$xRy$$ is true, then $$|x| - |y| > 0$$, meaning $$|x| > |y|$$.
- For $$yRx$$ to be true, we would need $$|y| - |x| > 0$$, meaning $$|y| > |x|$$.
- Both cannot be true at the same time. If $$|x| > |y|$$, then $$|y| - |x|$$ will be negative and cannot be between $$0$$ and $$1$$.
- Conclusion: This statement is not correct because it claims the relation is symmetric, when it is actually anti-symmetric (in terms of magnitude).
The correct answer (the statement that is not correct) is (D).
If the domain of the function $$f(x) = \frac{\cos^{-1}\sqrt{x^2 - x + 1}}{\sqrt{\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2x-1}{2}\right)}}$$ is the interval $$(\alpha, \beta]$$, then $$\alpha + \beta$$ is equal to:
We need to find the domain of $$f(x) = \frac{\cos^{-1}\sqrt{x^2 - x + 1}}{\sqrt{\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2x-1}{2}\right)}}$$.
Condition 1 (square root inside cos inverse): We need $$x^2 - x + 1 \geq 0$$. The discriminant is $$1 - 4 = -3 < 0$$ with positive leading coefficient, so this is always positive. Always satisfied.
Condition 2 (argument of cos inverse in $$[-1,1]$$): Since $$\sqrt{x^2 - x + 1} \geq 0$$, we need $$\sqrt{x^2 - x + 1} \leq 1$$, i.e., $$x^2 - x + 1 \leq 1$$, so $$x^2 - x \leq 0$$, giving $$x(x-1) \leq 0$$, i.e., $$0 \leq x \leq 1$$.
Condition 3 (argument of sin inverse in $$[-1,1]$$): $$-1 \leq \frac{2x-1}{2} \leq 1$$ gives $$-\frac{1}{2} \leq x \leq \frac{3}{2}$$.
Condition 4 (denominator positive): $$\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2x-1}{2}\right) > 0$$. Since $$\sin^{-1}(t) > 0$$ iff $$t > 0$$, we need $$\frac{2x-1}{2} > 0$$, i.e., $$x > \frac{1}{2}$$.
Intersecting all conditions: $$0 \leq x \leq 1$$ and $$x > \frac{1}{2}$$ gives $$\frac{1}{2} < x \leq 1$$, i.e., the interval $$\left(\frac{1}{2}, 1\right]$$.
So $$\alpha = \frac{1}{2}$$ and $$\beta = 1$$, giving $$\alpha + \beta = \frac{3}{2}$$.
The answer is $$\frac{3}{2}$$, which is Option A.
Let $$f : N \rightarrow N$$ be a function such that $$f(m+n) = f(m) + f(n)$$ for every $$m, n \in N$$. If $$f(6) = 18$$ then $$f(2) \cdot f(3)$$ is equal to:
We are given a function $$f : \mathbb N \rightarrow \mathbb N$$ satisfying the additive property
$$f(m+n)=f(m)+f(n) \quad \text{for all } m,n\in\mathbb N.$$
First, we recall the standard fact that if a function on the natural numbers is additive in this way, then its value at any positive integer can be built up by repeatedly adding the value at $$1$$. More precisely, we use the principle of mathematical induction:
For $$n=1$$ the statement $$f(1)=f(1)$$ is trivially true. Now assume $$f(k)=k\,f(1)$$ for some $$k\in\mathbb N$$. Then, using the given property,
$$f(k+1)=f(k)+f(1).$$
Substituting the induction hypothesis $$f(k)=k\,f(1)$$, we obtain
$$f(k+1)=k\,f(1)+f(1)=(k+1)\,f(1).$$
Thus by induction the general formula
$$f(n)=n\,f(1) \quad\text{holds for every } n\in\mathbb N.$$
Now we use the given numerical information. We are told that
$$f(6)=18.$$
Applying the formula $$f(6)=6\,f(1)$$ we write
$$6\,f(1)=18.$$
Dividing both sides by $$6$$, we get
$$f(1)=\frac{18}{6}=3.$$
With $$f(1)$$ known, we can find the required values:
For $$n=2$$,
$$f(2)=2\,f(1)=2\times 3=6.$$
For $$n=3$$,
$$f(3)=3\,f(1)=3\times 3=9.$$
The question asks for the product $$f(2)\cdot f(3)$$. Substituting the values just found,
$$f(2)\cdot f(3)=6\times 9=54.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$f : R - \{\frac{\alpha}{6}\} \to R$$ be defined by $$f(x) = \left(\frac{5x+3}{6x-\alpha}\right)$$. Then the value of $$\alpha$$ for which $$(f \circ f)(x) = x$$, for all $$x \in R - \{\frac{\alpha}{6}\}$$, is:
We have $$f(x) = \frac{5x + 3}{6x - \alpha}$$. We need $$(f \circ f)(x) = x$$ for all $$x \in R \setminus \{\frac{\alpha}{6}\}$$.
Computing $$f(f(x))$$ directly: let $$u = f(x) = \frac{5x+3}{6x-\alpha}$$, then $$f(u) = \frac{5u + 3}{6u - \alpha} = \frac{5\cdot\frac{5x+3}{6x-\alpha} + 3}{6\cdot\frac{5x+3}{6x-\alpha} - \alpha}.$$
Multiplying numerator and denominator by $$(6x - \alpha)$$: $$f(f(x)) = \frac{5(5x+3) + 3(6x-\alpha)}{6(5x+3) - \alpha(6x-\alpha)} = \frac{25x + 15 + 18x - 3\alpha}{30x + 18 - 6\alpha x + \alpha^2}.$$
For this to equal $$x$$ for all valid $$x$$, we need $$\frac{(25+18)x + (15-3\alpha)}{(30-6\alpha)x + (18+\alpha^2)} = x$$, i.e., $$(43)x + (15-3\alpha) = x\left[(30-6\alpha)x + (18+\alpha^2)\right].$$
For this to hold as an identity, the coefficient of $$x^2$$ on the right must be zero: $$30 - 6\alpha = 0$$, but this gives $$\alpha = 5$$. Let us verify: with $$\alpha = 5$$, the numerator becomes $$(25+18)x + (15-15) = 43x$$ and the denominator becomes $$(30-30)x + (18+25) = 43$$, so $$f(f(x)) = \frac{43x}{43} = x$$. ✓
Therefore $$\alpha = 5$$.
Let $$N$$ be the set of natural numbers and a relation $$R$$ on $$N$$ be defined by $$R = \{(x, y) \in N \times N : x^3 - 3x^2y - xy^2 + 3y^3 = 0\}$$. Then the relation $$R$$ is:
We start with the set $$N=\{1,2,3,\dots\}$$ of natural numbers and the relation
$$R=\{(x,y)\in N\times N : x^{3}-3x^{2}y-xy^{2}+3y^{3}=0\}.$$
First we rewrite the condition in a more workable form. For any ordered pair $$(x,y)\in N\times N$$ with $$y\neq 0$$ (which is always true in $$N$$) let us put $$x=ty$$, i.e. let $$t=\dfrac{x}{y}.$$ Substituting $$x=ty$$ into the polynomial we get
$$$ x^{3}-3x^{2}y-xy^{2}+3y^{3} = (ty)^{3}-3(ty)^{2}\,y-(ty)\,y^{2}+3y^{3}. $$$
Simplifying each term gives
$$$ (ty)^{3}=t^{3}y^{3}, \qquad 3(ty)^{2}y = 3t^{2}y^{3}, \qquad (ty)y^{2}=ty^{3}. $$$
Hence
$$$ x^{3}-3x^{2}y-xy^{2}+3y^{3} = t^{3}y^{3}-3t^{2}y^{3}-t y^{3}+3y^{3} = y^{3}\bigl(t^{3}-3t^{2}-t+3\bigr). $$$
The factor $$y^{3}$$ is never zero in $$N$$, so the whole expression is zero exactly when
$$$ t^{3}-3t^{2}-t+3=0. $$$
Now we factor this cubic. We test the obvious integer divisor $$t=1$$:
$$$ 1^{3}-3(1)^{2}-1+3 =1-3-1+3=0, $$$
so $$t-1$$ is a factor. Performing polynomial division (or synthetic division) we get
$$$ t^{3}-3t^{2}-t+3=(t-1)(t^{2}-2t-3). $$$
Next we factor the quadratic $$t^{2}-2t-3$$:
$$$ t^{2}-2t-3=(t-3)(t+1). $$$
Therefore
$$$ t^{3}-3t^{2}-t+3=(t-1)(t-3)(t+1)=0. $$$
For $$t\in\mathbb{Q}$$ (and especially for $$t\in N$$) the roots are $$t=1,\;t=3,\;t=-1$$. Since $$t=\dfrac{x}{y}$$ is positive in $$N$$, the admissible values are
$$$ t=1\quad\text{or}\quad t=3. $$$
That is,
$$$ \dfrac{x}{y}=1\;\;\Longrightarrow\;\;x=y, \qquad \dfrac{x}{y}=3\;\;\Longrightarrow\;\;x=3y. $$$
Hence the defining equation vanishes precisely for the two patterns
$$$ R=\{(x,y)\in N\times N : x=y\ \text{or}\ x=3y\}. $$$
With this explicit description we can check the three properties one by one.
Reflexive: For every $$a\in N$$ we have $$a=a$$, so $$(a,a)\in R$$ by the first alternative $$x=y$$. Thus $$R$$ is reflexive.
Symmetric: Assume $$(x,y)\in R$$. Two sub-cases arise.
• If $$x=y$$, then $$(y,x)=(x,x)$$ is again in $$R$$, so symmetry is fine in this sub-case.
• If $$x=3y$$, then $$y=\dfrac{x}{3}$$. For $$(y,x)$$ to belong to $$R$$ we would need either $$y=x$$ (impossible because $$x=3y\neq y$$) or $$y=3x$$ (impossible because it would give $$x=0$$). Therefore $$(y,x)\notin R$$ whenever $$x=3y$$ with $$y\ge1$$. A concrete instance is $$(3,1)\in R$$ while $$(1,3)\notin R$$.
So the relation is not symmetric.
Transitive: We need to see whether $$(x,y)\in R$$ and $$(y,z)\in R$$ always force $$(x,z)\in R$$. Take the pairs
$$$ (x,y)=(9,3),\quad (y,z)=(3,1). $$$
The first belongs to $$R$$ because $$9=3\cdot3$$, the second because $$3=3\cdot1$$. However, $$(x,z)=(9,1)$$ satisfies neither $$9=1$$ nor $$9=3\cdot1$$, so $$(9,1)\notin R$$. Hence $$R$$ fails transitivity.
Collecting the results, $$R$$ is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 2.
Let $$[x]$$ denote the greatest integer $$\le x$$, where $$x \in R$$. If the domain of the real valued function $$f(x) = \sqrt{\frac{|x|-2}{|x|-3}}$$ is $$(-\infty, a) \cup [b, c) \cup [4, \infty)$$, $$a < b < c$$, then the value of $$a + b + c$$ is:
The problem defines $$[x]$$ as the greatest integer function. The function under consideration is $$f(x) = \sqrt{\dfrac{|[x]|-2}{|[x]|-3}}$$, which requires $$\dfrac{|[x]|-2}{|[x]|-3} \ge 0$$ with $$|[x]| \ne 3$$.
Setting $$n = [x]$$ (an integer), the condition $$\dfrac{|n|-2}{|n|-3} \ge 0$$ holds when $$|n| \le 2$$ or $$|n| \ge 4$$ (excluding $$|n| = 3$$).
We translate each integer condition back to $$x$$, using $$[x] = n \iff x \in [n, n+1)$$.
For $$|n| \le 2$$: $$n \in \{-2,-1,0,1,2\}$$, so $$x \in [-2,-1) \cup [-1,0) \cup [0,1) \cup [1,2) \cup [2,3) = [-2, 3)$$.
For $$|n| = 3$$ (excluded): $$n = -3$$ gives $$x \in [-3,-2)$$, and $$n = 3$$ gives $$x \in [3,4)$$. These are excluded from the domain.
For $$|n| \ge 4$$: $$n \le -4$$ gives $$x \in (-\infty,-3)$$, and $$n \ge 4$$ gives $$x \in [4,\infty)$$.
Therefore the domain is $$(-\infty,-3) \cup [-2,3) \cup [4,\infty)$$.
Matching with the given form $$(-\infty, a) \cup [b,c) \cup [4,\infty)$$: we identify $$a = -3$$, $$b = -2$$, $$c = 3$$.
Hence $$a + b + c = -3 + (-2) + 3 = -2$$.
Let $$f, g : N \to N$$ such that $$f(n + 1) = f(n) + f(1)$$ $$\forall n \in N$$ and $$g$$ be any arbitrary function. Which of the following statements is NOT true?
Given $$f(n + 1) = f(n) + f(1)$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$, we can deduce that $$f(n) = n \cdot f(1)$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$ (by induction). Let $$f(1) = k$$ where $$k \in \mathbb{N}$$, so $$f(n) = kn$$.
Checking Option A: If $$f$$ is onto, then every natural number must be in the range. Since $$f(n) = kn$$, the range is $$\{k, 2k, 3k, \ldots\}$$. For this to equal $$\mathbb{N}$$, we need $$k = 1$$, so $$f(n) = n$$. This statement is TRUE.
Checking Option C: $$f$$ is one-one. Since $$f(n) = kn$$ and $$k \geq 1$$, if $$f(m) = f(n)$$ then $$km = kn$$ so $$m = n$$. This statement is TRUE.
Checking Option D: If $$f \circ g$$ is one-one, then $$g$$ is one-one. If $$g(m) = g(n)$$, then $$f(g(m)) = f(g(n))$$, and since $$f \circ g$$ is one-one, we must have $$m = n$$. This statement is TRUE.
Checking Option B: If $$g$$ is onto, then $$f \circ g$$ is one-one. Consider the counterexample where $$k = 1$$ (so $$f(n) = n$$) and define $$g$$ as: $$g(1) = g(2) = 1$$ and $$g(n) = n - 1$$ for $$n \geq 3$$. Then $$g$$ is onto (every natural number is in the range), but $$f(g(1)) = f(1) = 1 = f(1) = f(g(2))$$ while $$1 \neq 2$$, so $$f \circ g$$ is NOT one-one. This statement is NOT TRUE.
Therefore, the statement that is NOT true is: if $$g$$ is onto, then $$f \circ g$$ is one-one.
The domain of the function $$\operatorname{cosec}^{-1}\left(\frac{1+x}{x}\right)$$ is:
We have the composite expression $$\csc^{-1}\!\left(\dfrac{1+x}{x}\right)$$. For the inverse cosecant (written as $$\csc^{-1}(y)$$) to be defined, its argument $$y$$ must satisfy the basic condition derived from the cosecant function:
$$|\csc\theta| \;\ge\; 1 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad |\;y\;| \;\ge\; 1,$$
because cosecant values never lie in the open interval $$(-1,\,1)$$. Hence we require
$$\left|\dfrac{1+x}{x}\right| \;\ge\; 1.$$
There is also the obvious restriction $$x \neq 0$$, since the denominator in $$\dfrac{1+x}{x}$$ cannot be zero. Now we proceed to solve the inequality step by step.
First, recall the property of absolute value that
$$|A| \;\ge\; 1 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad A^2 \;\ge\; 1,$$
because squaring a non-negative number preserves the inequality. Setting $$A=\dfrac{1+x}{x}$$, we write
$$\left(\dfrac{1+x}{x}\right)^{\!2} \;\ge\; 1.$$
Expanding the square in the numerator and denominator, we obtain
$$\dfrac{(1+x)^2}{x^2} \;\ge\; 1.$$
To clear the denominator, multiply both sides by $$x^2$$. Since $$x^2$$ is always non-negative, the direction of the inequality remains unchanged:
$$(1+x)^2 \;\ge\; x^2.$$
Next, expand $$\bigl(1 + x\bigr)^2$$:
$$(1 + x)^2 \;=\; 1 + 2x + x^2.$$
Substituting this into the inequality gives
$$1 + 2x + x^2 \;\ge\; x^2.$$
Now subtract $$x^2$$ from both sides to simplify:
$$1 + 2x + x^2 - x^2 \;\ge\; 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 1 + 2x \;\ge\; 0.$$
The $$x^2$$ terms cancel, leaving the linear inequality
$$2x + 1 \;\ge\; 0.$$
Solve for $$x$$ by first subtracting $$1$$:
$$2x \;\ge\; -1,$$
and then dividing by $$2$$ (which is positive, so the inequality direction is preserved):
$$x \;\ge\; -\dfrac{1}{2}.$$
Combining this result with the earlier restriction $$x \neq 0$$, the set of permissible $$x$$-values is
$$\left[-\dfrac{1}{2},\,\infty\right) \;-\;\{0\}.$$
Therefore, the domain of the function $$\csc^{-1}\!\left(\dfrac{1+x}{x}\right)$$ is exactly
$$\left[-\dfrac{1}{2},\,\infty\right) - \{0\}.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
If $$[x]$$ be the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$, then $$\sum_{n=8}^{100} \left[\frac{(-1)^n n}{2}\right]$$ is equal to:
We have to evaluate the finite sum
$$\sum_{n=8}^{100}\left[\frac{(-1)^n\,n}{2}\right]$$
where $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$ (the “floor” of $$x$$).
First we separate the index $$n$$ into the two possible parities because the factor $$(-1)^n$$ behaves differently for even and odd indices.
For an even integer $$n$$ we can write $$n=2k$$. Then $$(-1)^n = 1$$, so
$$\frac{(-1)^n\,n}{2}= \frac{1\cdot 2k}{2}=k,$$ and since $$k$$ is already an integer, its greatest-integer value is
$$\left[\frac{(-1)^n\,n}{2}\right]=k=\frac{n}{2}.$$
For an odd integer $$n$$ we can write $$n=2k+1$$. Then $$(-1)^n = -1$$, so
$$\frac{(-1)^n\,n}{2}= \frac{-1\cdot(2k+1)}{2}= -\left(k+\tfrac12\right).$$
The number $$-\!\left(k+\tfrac12\right)$$ lies strictly between the two consecutive integers $$-(k+1)$$ and $$-k$$ and is less than both of them, hence its greatest-integer value is
$$\left[\frac{(-1)^n\,n}{2}\right]=-(k+1)= -\frac{n+1}{2}.$$
So, term by term,
$$ \left[\frac{(-1)^n\,n}{2}\right]= \begin{cases} \dfrac{n}{2}, & n \text{ even},\\[6pt] -\dfrac{n+1}{2}, & n \text{ odd}. \end{cases} $$
Now we split the required sum into its even and odd parts:
$$ \sum_{n=8}^{100}\Bigl[\tfrac{(-1)^n n}{2}\Bigr] =\sum_{\substack{n=8\\ n\text{ even}}}^{100}\frac{n}{2} +\sum_{\substack{n=8\\ n\text{ odd}}}^{100}\!\!\!\!\left(-\frac{n+1}{2}\right). $$
The even values of $$n$$ run from 8 to 100: 8, 10, 12, …, 100.
There are
$$\frac{100-8}{2}+1=\frac{92}{2}+1=46+1=47$$
such even integers. For each of them we take half, giving the consecutive integers
$$4,\,5,\,6,\ldots,\,50$$
(because $$8/2=4$$ and $$100/2=50$$). Their sum is obtained by the formula for an arithmetic progression:
$$ \sum_{\text{even }n}\frac{n}{2} =\frac{\text{number of terms}}{2}\,( \text{first term}+\text{last term}) =\frac{47}{2}\,(4+50) =\frac{47}{2}\times54 =47\times27 =1269. $$
The odd values of $$n$$ run from 9 to 99:
9, 11, 13, …, 99.
There are 46 of them, because the total count 93 minus the 47 evens gives 46 odds. For each odd $$n$$ we substitute $$-\dfrac{n+1}{2}$$. Now $$(n+1)/2$$ for these odds is the consecutive list
$$5,\,6,\,7,\ldots,\,50,$$
and taking the negative gives
$$-5,\,-6,\,-7,\ldots,\,-50.$$
Again using the arithmetic-progression formula, the sum of these 46 integers is
$$ \sum_{\text{odd }n}\left(-\frac{n+1}{2}\right) =-\,\frac{46}{2}\,(5+50) =-\,23\times55 =-1265. $$
Combining the even and odd contributions:
$$ \sum_{n=8}^{100}\Bigl[\tfrac{(-1)^n n}{2}\Bigr] =1269 + (-1265)=4. $$
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$f : R - \{3\} \to R - \{1\}$$ be defined by $$f(x) = \frac{x-2}{x-3}$$. Let $$g : R \to R$$ be given as $$g(x) = 2x - 3$$. Then, the sum of all the values of $$x$$ for which $$f^{-1}(x) + g^{-1}(x) = \frac{13}{2}$$ is equal to
Given $$f(x) = \frac{x-2}{x-3}$$, we find $$f^{-1}$$. Setting $$y = \frac{x-2}{x-3}$$, we solve for $$x$$: $$y(x-3) = x - 2$$, so $$yx - 3y = x - 2$$, giving $$x(y-1) = 3y - 2$$, hence $$x = \frac{3y - 2}{y - 1}$$. Therefore $$f^{-1}(x) = \frac{3x - 2}{x - 1}$$.
Given $$g(x) = 2x - 3$$, we find $$g^{-1}(x) = \frac{x + 3}{2}$$.
The equation $$f^{-1}(x) + g^{-1}(x) = \frac{13}{2}$$ becomes $$\frac{3x-2}{x-1} + \frac{x+3}{2} = \frac{13}{2}$$. Multiplying through by $$2(x-1)$$: $$2(3x-2) + (x+3)(x-1) = 13(x-1)$$. Expanding: $$6x - 4 + x^2 + 2x - 3 = 13x - 13$$. This simplifies to $$x^2 + 8x - 7 = 13x - 13$$, so $$x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0$$, which factors as $$(x-2)(x-3) = 0$$.
Thus $$x = 2$$ or $$x = 3$$. Both values are in the domain of $$f^{-1}$$ (since $$x \neq 1$$). The sum of all values is $$2 + 3 = 5$$.
Consider function $$f : A \rightarrow B$$ and $$g : B \rightarrow C$$ $$(A, B, C \subseteq R)$$ such that $$(gof)^{-1}$$ exists, then:
We begin with the information that $$f:A\rightarrow B$$ and $$g:B\rightarrow C$$ are two real-valued functions such that the composite function $$g\circ f:A\rightarrow C$$ possesses an inverse, written $$(g\circ f)^{-1}$$.
A function admits an inverse if and only if it is bijective; that is, it must be simultaneously one-one (injective) and onto (surjective). Hence we may immediately state
$$g\circ f \text{ is one-one and onto.}$$
We now translate the bijectivity of $$g\circ f$$ into separate conditions on $$f$$ and $$g$$.
Injectivity part: To prove that $$f$$ is one-one, let us take any two elements $$x_{1},x_{2}\in A$$ and assume that their images under $$f$$ coincide, i.e.
$$f(x_{1})=f(x_{2}).$$
Applying $$g$$ on both sides we obtain
$$g\!\left(f(x_{1})\right)=g\!\left(f(x_{2})\right) \;\Longrightarrow\; (g\circ f)(x_{1})=(g\circ f)(x_{2}).$$
Since $$g\circ f$$ is injective, equality of the outputs forces equality of the inputs, so
$$x_{1}=x_{2}.$$
This derivation shows that no two distinct elements of $$A$$ can share the same image under $$f$$; therefore $$f$$ is one-one (injective).
Surjectivity part: To show that $$g$$ is onto, start with an arbitrary element $$c\in C$$. Because $$g\circ f$$ is surjective, there exists some $$a\in A$$ satisfying
$$(g\circ f)(a)=c.$$
Writing the composition explicitly, this reads
$$g\!\bigl(f(a)\bigr)=c.$$
Denote $$b=f(a)\in B$$; then the equation becomes $$g(b)=c$$. We have thus produced an element $$b\in B$$ whose image under $$g$$ is the pre-selected $$c$$, verifying that every element of $$C$$ is attained by $$g$$. Consequently, $$g$$ is onto (surjective).
Putting the two deductions together, we have established that
$$f \text{ is one-one and } g \text{ is onto.}$$
None of the other combinations is compelled by the mere bijectivity of $$g\circ f$$. Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The inverse of $$y = 5^{\log x}$$ is:
We need the inverse function of $$y = 5^{\log x}$$.
Taking logarithm (base 10) on both sides: $$\log y = \log x \cdot \log 5$$.
Solving for $$\log x$$: $$\log x = \frac{\log y}{\log 5}$$.
So $$x = 10^{\frac{\log y}{\log 5}}$$.
We can write this as $$x = \left(10^{\log y}\right)^{1/\log 5} = y^{1/\log 5}$$, since $$10^{\log y} = y$$.
For the inverse function, we swap $$x$$ and $$y$$: $$y = x^{1/\log 5}$$.
This matches Option C: $$y = x^{\frac{1}{\log 5}}$$.
If $$A = \{x \in R : |x-2| > 1\}$$, $$B = \{x \in R : \sqrt{x^2 - 3} > 1\}$$, $$C = \{x \in R : |x-4| \geq 2\}$$ and $$Z$$ is the set of all integers, then the number of subsets of the set $$(A \cap B \cap C)^c \cap Z$$ is _________.
We begin by translating each set description into interval form on the real number line.
For set $$A$$ we have the condition $$|x-2|>1$$. The definition of absolute value gives the equivalence
$$|x-2|>1 \;\Longrightarrow\; x-2<-1 \;\text{ or }\; x-2>1.$$
Simplifying each inequality,
$$x<1 \;\text{ or }\; x>3.$$
Hence
$$A=(-\infty,1)\cup(3,\infty).$$
For set $$B$$ the requirement is $$\sqrt{x^{2}-3}>1.$$ Because the square-root function is non-negative, we square both sides, knowing the direction of the inequality will not change:
$$\bigl(\sqrt{x^{2}-3}\bigr)^{2}>1^{2}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^{2}-3>1.$$
This rearranges to
$$x^{2}>4\quad\Longrightarrow\quad |x|>2.$$
Therefore
$$B=(-\infty,-2)\cup(2,\infty).$$
For set $$C$$ we are given $$|x-4|\ge 2$$. Using the same absolute-value definition,
$$|x-4|\ge 2 \;\Longrightarrow\; x-4\le-2 \;\text{ or }\; x-4\ge 2,$$
which simplifies to
$$x\le2 \;\text{ or }\; x\ge6.$$
Thus
$$C=(-\infty,2]\cup[6,\infty).$$
Now we find the intersection $$A\cap B$$. Writing the two interval unions together,
$$A=(-\infty,1)\cup(3,\infty),\qquad B=(-\infty,-2)\cup(2,\infty).$$
On the left half-line $$(-\infty,1)$$, the part common with $$B$$ is the portion further restricted by $$x<-2$$, giving $$(-\infty,-2).$$ On the right half-line $$(3,\infty)$$, every point already satisfies $$x>2$$, so the whole interval $$(3,\infty)$$ survives. Consequently
$$A\cap B=(-\infty,-2)\cup(3,\infty).$$
Next we intersect this result with $$C$$:
$$C=(-\infty,2]\cup[6,\infty).$$
The interval $$(-\infty,-2)$$ of $$A\cap B$$ obviously lies inside $$(-\infty,2]$$ of $$C$$, so it remains unchanged. The interval $$(3,\infty)$$ meets $$C$$ only where $$x\ge6$$, giving $$[6,\infty).$$ Therefore
$$A\cap B\cap C=(-\infty,-2)\cup[6,\infty).$$
We now form the complement of this set inside $$\mathbb R$$. Using the fact that the complement of a union is the union of complements, we remove both pieces from the real line:
$$\bigl(A\cap B\cap C\bigr)^{c}=\mathbb R\setminus\bigl((-\infty,-2)\cup[6,\infty)\bigr)=\,[ -2,6 ).$$
Here $$-2$$ is included because it was not in the intersection (the first interval was open at $$-2$$), while $$6$$ is excluded because it was contained in the intersection (the second interval was closed at $$6$$).
To finish, we intersect with $$Z$$, the set of all integers. The integers lying in $$[-2,6)$$ are
$$\{-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5\}.$$
We count their number:
$$n=8.$$
The question asks for the number of subsets of this finite set. A fundamental result of set theory states that a set with $$n$$ elements has $$2^{n}$$ distinct subsets (including the empty set and the set itself). Substituting $$n=8$$, we get
$$2^{8}=256.$$
So, the answer is $$256$$.
Let $$A = \{n \in N \mid n^2 \leq n + 10000\}$$, $$B = \{3k + 1 \mid k \in N\}$$ and $$C = \{2k \mid k \in N\}$$, then the sum of all the elements of the set $$A \cap (B - C)$$ is equal to _________.
First, recall that in JEE problems the symbol $$N$$ denotes the set of positive integers $$\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$$; the number $$0$$ is not included.
We begin with the description of the set $$A$$. By definition
$$A=\{\,n\in N\mid n^{2}\le n+10000\,\}.$$
To find all such $$n$$ we rearrange the inequality:
$$n^{2}\le n+10000 \;\Longrightarrow\; n^{2}-n-10000\le 0.$$
We apply the quadratic-formula roots of $$n^{2}-n-10000=0$$. The formula is stated first:
If $$ax^{2}+bx+c=0,\text{ then }x=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}.$$
For the present quadratic $$a=1,\;b=-1,\;c=-10000$$, so
$$n=\dfrac{-(-1)\pm\sqrt{(-1)^{2}-4(1)(-10000)}}{2(1)} =\dfrac{1\pm\sqrt{1+40000}}{2} =\dfrac{1\pm\sqrt{40001}}{2}.$$
The discriminant $$40001$$ lies between $$200^{2}=40000$$ and $$201^{2}=40401$$, therefore
$$200<\sqrt{40001}<201.$$
Consequently
$$\dfrac{1-\sqrt{40001}}{2}\approx -99.5 \quad\text{and}\quad \dfrac{1+\sqrt{40001}}{2}\approx 100.5.$$
Because $$n$$ must be a positive integer, the inequality $$n^{2}-n-10000\le 0$$ restricts $$n$$ to
$$1\le n\le 100.$$
Hence
$$A=\{1,2,3,\ldots,100\}.$$
Next we examine the set $$B$$:
$$B=\{\,3k+1\mid k\in N\}=\{\,4,7,10,13,\ldots\}.$$
The set $$C$$ is
$$C=\{\,2k\mid k\in N\}=\{\,2,4,6,8,\ldots\},$$
the collection of all positive even integers.
The expression $$B-C$$ means “all elements of $$B$$ that are not in $$C$$.” Because every element of $$C$$ is even, an element $$3k+1$$ is removed whenever it is even. Let us determine the parity of $$3k+1$$:
Parity $$(3k) = \text{Parity}(k)\;(\text{since }3\text{ is odd}).$$
Therefore
$$3k+1$$ is odd $$\Longleftrightarrow k$$ is even $$.$$
Only those $$k$$ that are even survive the subtraction $$B-C$$. Write $$k=2m$$ with $$m\in N$$; then
$$3k+1=3(2m)+1=6m+1.$$
Thus
$$B-C=\{\,6m+1\mid m\in N\,\}=\{\,7,13,19,25,\ldots\}.$$
Now we intersect with $$A$$. We need all numbers of the form $$6m+1$$ that do not exceed $$100$$:
$$6m+1\le100 \;\Longrightarrow\; 6m\le99 \;\Longrightarrow\; m\le16.5.$$
Because $$m$$ is a positive integer, $$m$$ ranges from $$1$$ to $$16$$ inclusive. For each $$m$$ we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} m=1&\;:\;6(1)+1=7,\\ m=2&\;:\;6(2)+1=13,\\ m=3&\;:\;6(3)+1=19,\\ &\;\;\vdots\\ m=16&:;;6(16)+1=97. \end{aligned}$$
Collecting every value we have the set
$$A\cap(B-C)=\{7,13,19,25,31,37,43,49,55,61,67,73,79,85,91,97\}.$$
This is an arithmetic progression whose first term is $$a_{1}=7$$, common difference is $$d=6$$, and the number of terms is $$n=16$$.
The sum $$S_{n}$$ of the first $$n$$ terms of an arithmetic progression is given by the formula
$$S_{n}=\dfrac{n}{2}\bigl(2a_{1}+(n-1)d\bigr).$$
Substituting $$n=16,\;a_{1}=7,\;d=6$$ we obtain
$$S_{16}=\dfrac{16}{2}\bigl(2\cdot7+(16-1)\cdot6\bigr) =8\bigl(14+15\cdot6\bigr) =8\bigl(14+90\bigr) =8\times104 =832.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option 832.
Let $$S = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7\}$$. Then the number of possible functions $$f : S \rightarrow S$$ such that $$f(m \cdot n) = f(m) \cdot f(n)$$ for every $$m, n \in S$$ and $$m \cdot n \in S$$, is equal to _________.
We are given the set $$S=\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7\}$$ and we must count all functions $$f:S\to S$$ that satisfy the multiplicative rule
$$f(m\cdot n)=f(m)\cdot f(n)$$
for every pair $$m,n\in S$$ for which the product $$m\cdot n$$ is still inside $$S$$. We begin by looking at the special element $$1$$.
Taking $$m=1$$ in the defining property gives the formula
$$f(1\cdot n)=f(1)\cdot f(n).$$
Because $$1\cdot n=n$$, this simplifies to
$$f(n)=f(1)\,f(n)\quad\text{for every }n\in S.$$
The only way this can hold for all $$n$$ (with the values always lying in $$S$$ and hence never being $$0$$) is when
$$f(1)=1.$$
So the value at $$1$$ is completely fixed.
Next we list all products inside $$S$$ that are still in $$S$$. Besides the trivial $$1\cdot n=n$$, only three distinct products appear:
$$2\cdot2=4,\qquad 2\cdot3=6,\qquad 3\cdot2=6.$$
No other product of two elements of $$S$$ stays within $$S$$, because, for instance, $$3\cdot3=9\notin S$$ and $$2\cdot4=8\notin S$$. Therefore the multiplicative rule imposes conditions only on the numbers $$4$$ and $$6$$. Let us introduce the convenient names
$$a=f(2),\qquad b=f(3).$$
Using the rule on each admissible product, we obtain:
1. For $$2\cdot2=4$$ we must have
$$f(4)=f(2\cdot2)=f(2)^2=a^2.$$ 2. For $$2\cdot3=6$$ (and equally for $$3\cdot2=6$$) we must have
$$f(6)=f(2\cdot3)=f(2)\,f(3)=ab.$$
Thus the values of $$f$$ at $$4$$ and $$6$$ are forced once we pick $$a=f(2)$$ and $$b=f(3)$$. In contrast, the values at $$5$$ and $$7$$ are not tied to any product lying in $$S$$, so they may be chosen freely from $$\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7\}$$ later on.
The crucial point is that every value of the function must lie in $$S$$. Hence we need
$$a^2\le 7\quad\text{and}\quad ab\le 7.$$
We now enumerate all possibilities for $$a$$ and $$b$$ satisfying these two inequalities.
• If $$a=1$$, then $$a^2=1\le7$$ automatically, and $$ab=b\le7$$ for every $$b\in\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7\}$$. So with $$a=1$$, we have $$7$$ admissible choices for $$b$$.
• If $$a=2$$, then $$a^2=4\le7$$ is still allowed, but the inequality $$ab\le7$$ becomes $$2b\le7$$, i.e. $$b\le3$$. Hence $$b$$ can be $$1,2,$$ or $$3$$, giving $$3$$ choices.
• If $$a\ge3$$, then $$a^2\ge9>7$$, which violates $$a^2\le7$$, so no further values of $$a$$ are possible.
Combining the two admissible cases, we have in total
$$7+3=10$$
legal pairs $$(a,b)=(f(2),f(3)).$$
After fixing such a pair, the values at $$4$$ and $$6$$ are already determined by $$f(4)=a^2$$ and $$f(6)=ab$$, and they automatically lie in $$S$$ by the way we chose $$a$$ and $$b$$. The final freedom rests with $$f(5)$$ and $$f(7)$$, each of which can be any of the $$7$$ members of $$S$$. Therefore the total number of distinct functions is
$$10\;\times\;7\;\times\;7 \;=\;10\;\times\;49 \;=\;490.$$
So, the answer is $$490$$.
If $$a + \alpha = 1, b + \beta = 2$$ and $$af(x) + \alpha f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = bx + \frac{\beta}{x}, x \neq 0$$, then the value of the expression $$\frac{f(x) + f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{x + \frac{1}{x}}$$ is ______.
We are given $$a + \alpha = 1$$, $$b + \beta = 2$$, and the functional equation $$af(x) + \alpha f\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = bx + \frac{\beta}{x}$$ for $$x \neq 0$$.
Replacing $$x$$ with $$\frac{1}{x}$$ in the functional equation gives $$af\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) + \alpha f(x) = \frac{b}{x} + \beta x$$.
Adding the original equation and this new equation: $$(a + \alpha)f(x) + (a + \alpha)f\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = (b + \beta)x + (b + \beta)\frac{1}{x}$$, which simplifies to $$(a + \alpha)\left[f(x) + f\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right] = (b + \beta)\left(x + \frac{1}{x}\right)$$.
Since $$a + \alpha = 1$$ and $$b + \beta = 2$$, we get $$f(x) + f\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 2\left(x + \frac{1}{x}\right)$$.
Therefore, $$\frac{f(x) + f\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{x + \frac{1}{x}} = 2$$.
The correct answer is $$2$$.
Consider the two sets:
$$A = \{m \in R : \text{both the roots of } x^2 - (m+1)x + m + 4 = 0 \text{ are real}\}$$ and $$B = [-3, 5)$$
Which of the following is not true?
We are given the quadratic equation $$x^{2}-(m+1)x+m+4=0$$ and we must find all real numbers $$m$$ for which both its roots are real.
For any quadratic equation $$ax^{2}+bx+c=0,$$ the condition for real roots is that its discriminant is non-negative.
So we state the formula: $$\text{If } ax^{2}+bx+c=0,\; \text{then real roots} \Longleftrightarrow b^{2}-4ac\ge 0.$$
Here, by comparison, we have $$a=1,\; b=-(m+1),\; c=m+4.$$
Now we compute the discriminant:
$$\begin{aligned} D &= b^{2}-4ac \\ &= (-(m+1))^{2}-4(1)(m+4) \\ &= (m+1)^{2}-4m-16. \end{aligned}$$
Next, we expand $$(m+1)^{2}:$$
$$\begin{aligned} (m+1)^{2} &= m^{2}+2m+1, \\ \therefore D &= (m^{2}+2m+1)-4m-16 \\ &= m^{2}+2m+1-4m-16 \\ &= m^{2}-2m-15. \end{aligned}$$
For real roots we require $$D\ge 0,$$ so
$$m^{2}-2m-15\ge 0.$$
We factor the left side completely:
$$m^{2}-2m-15=(m-5)(m+3).$$
Thus,
$$ (m-5)(m+3)\ge 0. $$
For a product of two linear factors, the inequality $$PQ\ge 0$$ holds when both factors are non-negative or both are non-positive. Analysis of the critical points $$m=-3$$ and $$m=5$$ gives:
$$m\le -3 \quad \text{or} \quad m\ge 5.$$
Therefore
$$A = (-\infty,\,-3]\;\cup\;[5,\infty).$$
We are also given
$$B=[-3,\,5).$$
Now we examine each option one by one.
Option A: $$A-B = (-\infty,-3)\cup(5,\infty)$$
We calculate $$A-B$$ carefully.
- On the left of $$-3,$$ the interval $$(-\infty,-3]$$ is in $$A$$; removing the point $$-3$$ (because $$-3\in B$$) leaves $$(-\infty,-3).$$
- On the right, $$[5,\infty)$$ lies totally outside $$B$$ because $$B$$ stops just before $$5.$$ Hence the entire closed interval $$[5,\infty)$$ stays in the difference.
Thus
$$A-B = (-\infty,-3)\;\cup\;[5,\infty).$$
But Option A omits the point $$5,$$ writing $$(5,\infty)$$ instead of $$[5,\infty).$$ Hence Option A is not true.
Option B: $$A\cap B=\{-3\}$$
The intersection of $$(-\infty,-3]$$ with $$[-3,5)$$ gives just the single point $$-3,$$ and $$[5,\infty)$$ has empty overlap with $$[-3,5).$$ Hence Option B is true.
Option C: $$B-A=(-3,5)$$
Inside $$B$$ the point $$-3$$ is removed because $$-3\in A,$$ and $$5$$ is not in $$B$$ at all, so what remains is the open interval $$(-3,5).$$ Thus Option C is true.
Option D: $$A\cup B=\mathbb{R}$$
The union $$(-\infty,-3]\cup[-3,5)\cup[5,\infty)$$ clearly covers every real number, so Option D is also true.
We see that the only statement that fails is Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
If $$A = \{x \in R : |x| < 2\}$$ and $$B = \{x \in R : |x - 2| \ge 3\}$$; then:
We have $$A=\{x\in\mathbb R:\;|x|<2\}.$$
The inequality $$|x|<2$$ means $$-2<x<2,$$ so
$$A=(-2,\,2).$$
Next, $$B=\{x\in\mathbb R:\;|x-2|\ge 3\}.$$
For any real number $$t$$ and positive constant $$c,$$ the rule
$$|t|\ge c \;\Longrightarrow\; t\ge c \;\text{or}\; t\le -c$$
applies. Putting $$t=x-2$$ and $$c=3$$, we get
$$x-2\ge 3 \;\text{or}\; x-2\le -3,$$
that is, $$x\ge 5 \;\text{or}\; x\le -1.$$
Hence
$$B=(-\infty,\,-1]\,\cup\,[5,\,\infty).$$
Let us check each option.
Option A: $$A\cap B$$ is the common part of $$(-2,2)$$ and $$(-\infty,-1]\cup[5,\infty).$$ The only overlap is $$(-2,-1],$$ so $$A\cap B=(-2,-1].$$ Option A claims $$(-2,-1)$$ (without the point $$-1$$), therefore Option A is wrong.
Option B: $$B-A$$ consists of elements in $$B$$ that are not in $$A=(-2,2).$$ Removing the piece $$(-2,-1]$$ from $$B$$ leaves
$$B-A=(-\infty,-2]\,\cup\,[5,\infty).$$
The complement of the open interval $$(-2,5)$$ in $$\mathbb R$$ is exactly
$$\mathbb R-(-2,5)=(-\infty,-2]\,\cup\,[5,\infty).$$
Thus $$B-A=\mathbb R-(-2,5),$$ matching Option B. So Option B is correct.
Option C: $$A\cup B=(-\infty,2)\cup[5,\infty),$$ which omits the point $$2.$$ Option C claims $$\mathbb R-(2,5)=(-\infty,2]\,\cup\,[5,\infty),$$ which does include $$2,$$ so Option C is incorrect.
Option D: $$A-B=(-2,2)-\bigl((-\infty,-1]\cup[5,\infty)\bigr)=(-1,2).$$ Option D states $$[-1,2),$$ which wrongly contains the point $$-1,$$ hence Option D is also incorrect.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The contrapositive of the statement "If I reach the station in time, then I will catch the train" is:
First, we identify the logical form of the given English sentence. The sentence “If I reach the station in time, then I will catch the train” can be written in symbolic logic as $$P \rightarrow Q,$$ where
$$P : \text{“I reach the station in time,”}$$ $$Q : \text{“I will catch the train.”}$$
Now, we recall the definition of a contrapositive. For any implication of the form
$$P \rightarrow Q,$$
the contrapositive is obtained by simultaneously negating both parts and reversing their order. Symbolically, the contrapositive is
$$\neg Q \;\rightarrow\; \neg P.$$
Here $$\neg$$ (read “not”) is the logical negation operator. So we proceed step by step.
First we negate the consequent $$Q$$: $$\neg Q : \text{“I will not catch the train.”}$$
Next we negate the antecedent $$P$$: $$\neg P : \text{“I do not reach the station in time.”}$$
Finally, we reverse their order in the implication. Thus the contrapositive of $$P \rightarrow Q$$ is written in words as
“If I will not catch the train, then I do not reach the station in time.”
This matches exactly with Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Which of the following statement is a tautology?
To decide which given statement is a tautology, we consider every option one by one and simplify it algebraically.
First, recall the basic logical equivalence for an implication:
$$a \rightarrow b \;\equiv\; \sim a \;\vee\; b.$$
We will convert each implication using this rule and then simplify.
Option A is $$p \,\vee\, (\sim q) \;\rightarrow\; p \,\wedge\, q.$$
Using the implication rule we have
$$\sim\bigl(p \,\vee\, (\sim q)\bigr) \;\vee\; (p \,\wedge\, q).$$
Apply De Morgan’s law to the negation:
$$\sim p \;\wedge\; q \;\vee\; p \;\wedge\; q.$$
Now take $$q$$ common:
$$q \;\wedge\;(\sim p \;\vee\; p).$$
Inside the parentheses, $$\sim p \;\vee\; p$$ is a tautology (it is always true). Therefore the whole expression reduces to
$$q \;\wedge\; \text{(True)} \;=\; q.$$
This final result $$q$$ is not always true (it is false when $$q$$ is false), so Option A is not a tautology.
Option B is $$\sim(p \,\wedge\, \sim q) \;\rightarrow\; p \,\vee\, q.$$
Convert the implication:
$$\sim\!\bigl(\sim(p \,\wedge\, \sim q)\bigr) \;\vee\; (p \,\vee\, q).$$
The double negation simplifies immediately:
$$(p \,\wedge\, \sim q) \;\vee\; p \;\vee\; q.$$
Group the $$p$$ terms:
$$p \;\vee\; (p \,\wedge\, \sim q) \;\vee\; q.$$
Using the absorption law $$p \,\vee\, (p \,\wedge\, r)=p,$$ we obtain
$$p \;\vee\; q.$$
The expression $$p \;\vee\; q$$ can be false (specifically when $$p$$ and $$q$$ are both false). Thus Option B is not a tautology.
Option C is $$\sim(p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\rightarrow\; p \,\wedge\, q.$$
Again convert the implication:
$$\sim\!\bigl(\sim(p \,\vee\, \sim q)\bigr) \;\vee\; (p \,\wedge\, q).$$
The double negation gives
$$(p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \,\wedge\, q).$$
Take $$p$$ common from the last two pieces:
$$p \;\vee\; \sim q \;\vee\; (p \,\wedge\, q).$$
Using absorption again, $$p \;\vee\; (p \,\wedge\, q)=p$$, so we get
$$p \;\vee\; \sim q.$$
This can be false whenever $$p$$ is false and $$q$$ is true. Hence Option C is not a tautology.
Option D is $$\sim(p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\rightarrow\; p \,\vee\, q.$$
Convert the implication exactly as before:
$$\sim\!\bigl(\sim(p \,\vee\, \sim q)\bigr) \;\vee\; (p \,\vee\, q).$$
Simplify the double negation:
$$(p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\vee\; (p \,\vee\, q).$$
Rearrange the terms:
$$p \;\vee\; \sim q \;\vee\; p \;\vee\; q.$$
Using idempotent law $$p \,\vee\, p = p,$$ merge the repeated $$p$$ terms:
$$p \;\vee\; \sim q \;\vee\; q.$$
Now notice that $$\sim q \;\vee\; q$$ is always true (law of excluded middle), so write
$$p \;\vee\; \text{(True)}.$$
Finally, $$\alpha \;\vee\; \text{(True)} = \text{True}$$ for any statement $$\alpha$$. Therefore the whole expression is always true, no matter what truth-values $$p$$ and $$q$$ take.
Thus Option D represents a statement that is true in every possible case; that is exactly the definition of a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Consider the statement: "For an integer n, if $$n^3 - 1$$ is even, then $$n$$ is odd". The contrapositive statement of this statement is:
We begin with the original conditional statement:
“For an integer $$n$$, if $$n^{3}-1$$ is even, then $$n$$ is odd.”
To form the contrapositive, we first identify its two parts clearly.
Let
$$P : n^{3}-1 \text{ is even}$$
$$Q : n \text{ is odd}$$
The original statement in symbolic form is $$P \Rightarrow Q$$, which reads “If $$P$$, then $$Q$$.”
Now, we recall the definition of a contrapositive. For any implication $$P \Rightarrow Q$$, the contrapositive is obtained by negating both parts and reversing the direction of implication. In symbols, the contrapositive is:
$$\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P$$
We now write down each negation explicitly.
Negation of $$Q$$:
$$\neg Q : n \text{ is not odd}$$
But for integers, “not odd” is the same as “even.” So we can re-express it as
$$\neg Q : n \text{ is even}$$
Negation of $$P$$:
$$\neg P : n^{3}-1 \text{ is not even}$$
Again, for integers, “not even” means “odd.” Hence we rewrite
$$\neg P : n^{3}-1 \text{ is odd}$$
Substituting these negations into the symbolic form $$\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P$$, we obtain the contrapositive sentence:
“For an integer $$n$$, if $$n$$ is even, then $$n^{3}-1$$ is odd.”
Looking at the options provided, this matches Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Contrapositive of the statement:
'If a function $$f$$ is differentiable at $$a$$, then it is also continuous at $$a$$', is
We begin with the original statement, which is an implication:
$$P : \text{The function } f \text{ is differentiable at } a$$
$$Q : \text{The function } f \text{ is continuous at } a$$
Stated in words, the implication is “If $$P$$, then $$Q$$” or symbolically $$P \Rightarrow Q$$.
To find its contrapositive, we recall the logical rule:
Formula for contrapositive: For any implication $$P \Rightarrow Q$$, the contrapositive is $$\lnot Q \Rightarrow \lnot P$$.
That is, we first negate the conclusion $$Q$$, then make it the new hypothesis; simultaneously we negate the original hypothesis $$P$$ and make it the new conclusion.
Applying this rule step by step:
1. Negate the conclusion $$Q$$.
The negation of “$$f$$ is continuous at $$a$$” is “$$f$$ is not continuous at $$a$$”.
So $$\lnot Q : \text{The function } f \text{ is not continuous at } a$$.
2. Negate the hypothesis $$P$$.
The negation of “$$f$$ is differentiable at $$a$$” is “$$f$$ is not differentiable at $$a$$”.
So $$\lnot P : \text{The function } f \text{ is not differentiable at } a$$.
3. Form the new implication $$\lnot Q \Rightarrow \lnot P$$.
In sentence form this reads: “If the function $$f$$ is not continuous at $$a$$, then $$f$$ is not differentiable at $$a$$.”
We now compare this derived contrapositive with the given options:
Option A: “If $$f$$ is continuous at $$a$$, then it is not differentiable at $$a$$.” (This is $$Q \Rightarrow \lnot P$$, not the contrapositive.)
Option B: “If $$f$$ is not continuous at $$a$$, then it is not differentiable at $$a$$.” (This matches $$\lnot Q \Rightarrow \lnot P$$ exactly.)
Option C: “If $$f$$ is not continuous at $$a$$, then it is differentiable at $$a$$.” (This is $$\lnot Q \Rightarrow P$$, the inverse of Option A, still incorrect.)
Option D: “If $$f$$ is continuous at $$a$$, then it is differentiable at $$a$$.” (This is simply the converse of the original statement.)
Only Option B reproduces the contrapositive. Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
For two statements $$p$$ and $$q$$, the logical statement $$(p \rightarrow q) \wedge (q \rightarrow \sim p)$$ is equivalent to
We begin with the compound statement
$$ (p \rightarrow q)\;\wedge\;(q \rightarrow \sim p). $$
First, recall the fundamental implication formula
$$ p \rightarrow q \;\equiv\; \sim p \,\vee\, q, $$
which says “if p then q” is logically the same as “either not p or q.” Applying this rule to each implication separately, we obtain
$$ (p \rightarrow q)\;=\;\sim p \,\vee\, q, $$
and
$$ (q \rightarrow \sim p)\;=\;\sim q \,\vee\, \sim p. $$
Therefore our original statement becomes
$$ (\sim p \,\vee\, q)\;\wedge\;(\sim q \,\vee\, \sim p). $$
Observe that both disjunctions contain the term $$\sim p$$, so it is natural to use the distributive law of Boolean algebra, which states
$$ (A \,\vee\, B)\;\wedge\;(A \,\vee\, C) \;\equiv\; A \,\vee\, (B \,\wedge\, C). $$
Here we identify
$$A = \sim p,\qquad B = q,\qquad C = \sim q.$$
Substituting these into the distributive formula, we have
$$ (\sim p \,\vee\, q)\;\wedge\;(\sim p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\equiv\; \sim p \,\vee\, (q \,\wedge\, \sim q). $$
Now, $$q \,\wedge\, \sim q$$ is a contradiction: one cannot have $$q$$ and “not $$q$$” true at the same time. Thus
$$ q \,\wedge\, \sim q \;\equiv\; \text{False}. $$
Using the identity $$A \,\vee\, \text{False} \equiv A$$, we finally arrive at
$$ \sim p \,\vee\, \text{False} \;\equiv\; \sim p. $$
Hence the entire logical statement simplifies to $$\sim p$$.
Looking at the given options, $$\sim p$$ corresponds to Option C.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Negation of the statement: $$\sqrt{5}$$ is an integer or 5 is irrational is:
We begin by translating the given English sentence into symbols. Let $$P$$ denote the statement “$$\sqrt{5}$$ is an integer.” Let $$Q$$ denote the statement “$$5$$ is irrational.” The original sentence is “$$\sqrt{5}$$ is an integer or 5 is irrational,” which is symbolically $$P \lor Q$$.
To find the negation, we recall the logical rule known as De Morgan’s law. The law states: for any two statements $$P$$ and $$Q$$, $$\neg(P \lor Q) \;=\; (\neg P) \land (\neg Q).$$ In words, “not (P or Q)” is equivalent to “(not P) and (not Q).”
Applying this formula to our case, we have $$\neg(P \lor Q) \;=\; (\neg P) \land (\neg Q).$$
Now we translate each piece back into ordinary language. The negation $$\neg P$$ is “$$\sqrt{5}$$ is not an integer.” The negation $$\neg Q$$ is “5 is not irrational,” i.e. “5 is rational” (indeed 5 is an integer, hence rational).
Combining these two with the connective “and,” we obtain “$$\sqrt{5}$$ is not an integer and 5 is not irrational.”
Examining the choices, this wording matches exactly with Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Given the following two statements:
$$(S_1)$$ : $$(q \vee p) \to (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$$ is a tautology
$$(S_2)$$ : $$\sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q)$$ is a fallacy. Then:
Let us first write clearly what every symbol means. The symbol $$\vee$$ stands for “or”, $$\wedge$$ for “and”, $$\sim$$ for “not”, $$\to$$ for “if … then …”, and $$\leftrightarrow$$ for “if and only if” (biconditional). A statement is a tautology when it is true for every possible truth-value assignment of its component variables, while it is a fallacy when it is false for every assignment.
We have two compound statements:
$$S_1 :\;(q \vee p) \to (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$$
$$S_2 :\;\sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q)$$
To test whether $$S_1$$ is a tautology, we enumerate all possible truth-values of $$p$$ and $$q$$. There are four possibilities: $$(p,q) = (T,T),\,(T,F),\,(F,T),\,(F,F).$$ For every pair we shall compute each sub-expression step by step.
Case 1: $$p=T,\;q=T$$
First, $$q \vee p = T \vee T = T.$$
Next, $$\sim q = \sim T = F,$$ so $$p \leftrightarrow \sim q = T \leftrightarrow F = F$$ because a biconditional is true only when both sides have the same truth value.
Finally, $$(q \vee p) \to (p \leftrightarrow \sim q) = T \to F = F,$$ since “true implies false” is false.
Case 2: $$p=T,\;q=F$$
Here, $$q \vee p = F \vee T = T.$$
Also, $$\sim q = \sim F = T,$$ hence $$p \leftrightarrow \sim q = T \leftrightarrow T = T.$$
Thus $$(q \vee p) \to (p \leftrightarrow \sim q) = T \to T = T.$$
Case 3: $$p=F,\;q=T$$
We obtain $$q \vee p = T \vee F = T.$$
Further, $$\sim q = \sim T = F,$$ so $$p \leftrightarrow \sim q = F \leftrightarrow F = T.$$
Consequently, $$(q \vee p) \to (p \leftrightarrow \sim q) = T \to T = T.$$
Case 4: $$p=F,\;q=F$$
Now $$q \vee p = F \vee F = F.$$
Whenever the antecedent of an implication is false, the whole implication is automatically true, because $$F \to X = T$$ for any $$X$$. Therefore we do not even need to calculate the biconditional; still, for completeness we note $$\sim q = T$$ and $$p \leftrightarrow \sim q = F \leftrightarrow T = F.$$ The implication is $$F \to F = T.$$
Collecting the truth values of $$S_1$$ we have: $$F,\;T,\;T,\;T.$$ Because one row (the very first) gives false, $$S_1$$ is not a tautology. So statement $$S_1$$ is incorrect.
Next we examine $$S_2 = \sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q)$$ to see whether it is a fallacy. Again we test all four assignments.
Case 1: $$p=T,\;q=T$$
Compute $$\sim q = F.$$
Compute $$\sim p = F,$$ so $$\sim p \leftrightarrow q = F \leftrightarrow T = F.$$
Hence $$\sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q) = F \wedge F = F.$$
Case 2: $$p=T,\;q=F$$
We get $$\sim q = T.$$
Also $$\sim p = F,$$ and $$\sim p \leftrightarrow q = F \leftrightarrow F = T.$$
Therefore $$\sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q) = T \wedge T = T.$$ This row gives true.
Case 3: $$p=F,\;q=T$$
Here $$\sim q = F.$$
Then $$\sim p = T,$$ and $$\sim p \leftrightarrow q = T \leftrightarrow T = T.$$
Thus $$\sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q) = F \wedge T = F.$$
Case 4: $$p=F,\;q=F$$
Now $$\sim q = T.$$
Also $$\sim p = T,$$ giving $$\sim p \leftrightarrow q = T \leftrightarrow F = F.$$
Hence $$\sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q) = T \wedge F = F.$$
The truth values obtained for $$S_2$$ are $$F,\;T,\;F,\;F.$$ Because at least one row (the second) is true, the statement is not always false; therefore it is not a fallacy. Hence statement $$S_2$$ is also incorrect.
We have shown that $$S_1$$ is not a tautology and $$S_2$$ is not a fallacy. Thus both statements asserted in the question are wrong.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
If $$p \to (p \wedge \sim q)$$ is false, then the truth values of $$p$$ and $$q$$ are respectively:
We are told that the proposition $$p \to (p \wedge \sim q)$$ is false.
First, we recall the fundamental rule for a material implication. The compound statement $$A \to B$$ is false only in the single case when the antecedent $$A$$ is true and the consequent $$B$$ is false. Symbolically,
$$A \to B = F \;\; \text{iff} \;\; A = T \text{ and } B = F.$$
In our problem, the antecedent is $$p$$ and the consequent is $$p \wedge \sim q.$$ So, for the whole implication to be false, we must have
$$p = T \quad\text{and}\quad (p \wedge \sim q) = F.$$
We already know from the first part that
$$p = T.$$
Now we must analyze the conjunctive statement $$p \wedge \sim q.$$ A conjunction $$X \wedge Y$$ is true only when both $$X$$ and $$Y$$ are true; otherwise it is false. Here,
$$X = p, \qquad Y = \sim q.$$
We have just found $$p = T.$$ Let us substitute this known value:
$$p \wedge \sim q = T \wedge \sim q.$$
We are told that this entire conjunction is actually false:
$$T \wedge \sim q = F.$$
The only way an expression of the form $$T \wedge Y$$ can be false is when the second factor $$Y$$ is false. Hence,
$$\sim q = F.$$
A negation $$\sim q$$ is false precisely when the original statement $$q$$ is true. Therefore,
$$q = T.$$
Collecting our results, we have obtained
$$p = T, \qquad q = T.$$
This matches Option C, which lists the truth values as $$T, T.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option 3.
If $$R = \{(x, y) : x, y \in Z, x^2 + 3y^2 \le 8\}$$ is a relation on the set of integers $$Z$$, then the domain of $$R^{-1}$$ is:
First, recall that the inverse relation $$R^{-1}$$ is obtained by interchanging the coordinates of every ordered pair of $$R$$. Consequently, every first component (the “domain”) of $$R^{-1}$$ comes from a second component of some ordered pair in $$R$$. In other words,
$$\text{Domain}(R^{-1})=\text{Range}(R).$$
Therefore we must determine all integer values of $$y$$ for which there exists at least one integer $$x$$ satisfying the inequality that defines $$R$$, namely
$$x^2+3y^2\le 8.$$
We systematically test every integer value of $$y$$ whose square cannot make the left-hand side exceed 8.
Let us examine successive values of $$y$$.
1. Take $$y=0$$. We have $$y^2=0$$, so the inequality becomes
$$x^2+3(0)^2\le 8 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^2\le 8.$$
The integer squares not exceeding 8 are $$0,1,4$$. Thus the corresponding integer values of $$x$$ are
$$x=\,-2,\,-1,\,0,\,1,\,2.$$
Since at least one such $$x$$ exists, $$y=0$$ appears in the range of $$R$$.
2. Next take $$y=1$$. We have $$y^2=1$$, giving
$$x^2+3(1)^2\le 8 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^2+3\le 8 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^2\le 5.$$
The integer squares not exceeding 5 are again $$0,1,4$$, so
$$x=\,-2,\,-1,\,0,\,1,\,2.$$
Hence $$y=1$$ also lies in the range of $$R$$.
3. Because the expression depends on $$y^2$$, the same result holds for $$y=-1$$. Indeed, $$(-1)^2=1$$, so the identical calculation shows at least one suitable $$x$$ exists. Thus $$y=-1$$ is present in the range of $$R$$.
4. Now consider $$y=2$$ or $$y=-2$$. Here $$y^2=4$$, leading to
$$x^2+3(4)\le 8 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^2+12\le 8 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^2\le -4.$$
The inequality $$x^2\le -4$$ has no integer solution because a square is always non-negative. Therefore $$y=\pm2$$ do not belong to the range of $$R$$.
5. For any $$|y|\ge 2$$, the value of $$3y^2$$ is at least 12, which already exceeds 8, so no integer $$x$$ can satisfy the defining inequality. Thus no further $$y$$ values are possible.
Collecting all successful $$y$$ values, we obtain
$$\text{Range}(R)=\{-1,\,0,\,1\}.$$
Therefore
$$\text{Domain}(R^{-1})=\{-1,\,0,\,1\}.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$p$$, $$q$$, $$r$$ be three statements such that the truth value of $$(p \wedge q) \to (\sim q \vee r)$$ is $$F$$. Then the truth values of $$p$$, $$q$$, $$r$$ are respectively:
We have the compound statement $$ (p \wedge q) \to (\sim q \vee r) $$ whose truth value is given to be $$F$$ (false).
First, recall the truth rule for an implication. The statement $$A \to B$$ is false only in one situation: when the antecedent $$A$$ is true and simultaneously the consequent $$B$$ is false. In every other case the implication is true.
Here the antecedent is $$p \wedge q$$ and the consequent is $$\sim q \vee r$$. Because the whole implication is false, we must have
$$ p \wedge q = T \quad \text{and} \quad \sim q \vee r = F. $$
Now we analyse each part in turn.
From $$ p \wedge q = T $$, the truth table of conjunction tells us that a conjunction is true only when both components are true. Hence
$$ p = T \quad \text{and} \quad q = T. $$
Next, look at the consequent $$\sim q \vee r$$. We already know $$q = T$$, so its negation is
$$ \sim q = \sim T = F. $$
The consequent simplifies to
$$ \sim q \vee r = F \vee r. $$
The truth table for a disjunction states that $$A \vee B$$ is false only when both $$A$$ and $$B$$ are false. We already have $$F$$ in place of $$A$$, so to make the entire disjunction false we must also have
$$ r = F. $$
Collecting the results, we find
$$ p = T, \; q = T, \; r = F. $$
Checking the option list, this matches Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The negation of the Boolean expression $$p \vee (\sim p \wedge q)$$ is equivalent to:
We are asked to find the negation of the Boolean expression $$p \vee (\sim p \wedge q)$$ and then match the simplified result with one of the given options.
First we write the required negation explicitly:
$$\neg\bigl[p \vee (\sim p \wedge q)\bigr].$$
We recall De Morgan’s first law, which states that for any two propositions $$A$$ and $$B$$, the negation of their disjunction is
$$\neg(A \vee B)=\neg A \wedge \neg B.$$
In our expression, we can treat $$A$$ as $$p$$ and $$B$$ as $$(\sim p \wedge q)$$. Applying the law we get
$$\neg\bigl[p \vee (\sim p \wedge q)\bigr] \;=\; \bigl(\neg p\bigr) \;\wedge\; \neg\bigl(\,\sim p \wedge q\,\bigr).$$
Now we turn to the second negation inside. Again, by De Morgan’s second law, which says
$$\neg(X \wedge Y)=\neg X \vee \neg Y,$$
we let $$X=\sim p$$ and $$Y=q$$. Thus
$$\neg\bigl(\,\sim p \wedge q\,\bigr)=\neg(\sim p) \;\vee\; \neg q.$$
The double negation rule $$\neg(\sim p)=p$$ simplifies the first term, so we have
$$\neg\bigl(\,\sim p \wedge q\,\bigr)=p \;\vee\; \neg q.$$
Substituting this back into the earlier expression yields
$$\bigl(\neg p\bigr) \wedge \bigl(p \;\vee\; \neg q\bigr).$$
We now use the distributive law of conjunction over disjunction, namely
$$X \wedge (Y \vee Z) = (X \wedge Y) \vee (X \wedge Z).$$
Here $$X=\neg p,$$ $$Y=p,$$ and $$Z=\neg q.$$ Distributing gives
$$\bigl(\neg p \wedge p\bigr) \;\vee\; \bigl(\neg p \wedge \neg q\bigr).$$
Observing that $$\neg p \wedge p$$ is always false (a contradiction), we replace it by the constant false value, traditionally denoted by $$0$$. Since $$0 \vee$$ (anything) is just that “anything,” the expression simplifies to
$$\neg p \wedge \neg q.$$
Thus the negation of $$p \vee (\sim p \wedge q)$$ is exactly $$\sim p \wedge \sim q$$, which corresponds to Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The negation of the Boolean expression $$x \leftrightarrow \sim y$$ is equivalent to:
We have to find the negation (logical NOT) of the Boolean statement $$x \leftrightarrow \sim y$$ and then express the result in a simplified disjunctive form so that it can be matched with one of the given options.
First of all, let us recall the standard equivalence for a biconditional. The formula for any two propositions $$p$$ and $$q$$ is:
$$p \leftrightarrow q \;=\; (p \wedge q)\;\vee\;(\sim p \wedge \sim q).$$
Now we apply this rule to the concrete biconditional $$x \leftrightarrow \sim y$$ by replacing $$p$$ with $$x$$ and $$q$$ with $$\sim y$$. Doing so gives:
$$x \leftrightarrow \sim y \;=\; (x \wedge \sim y)\;\vee\;(\sim x \wedge \sim(\sim y)).$$
The double negation inside the second conjunct can be removed with the rule $$\sim(\sim y)=y$$. Hence we get:
$$x \leftrightarrow \sim y \;=\; (x \wedge \sim y)\;\vee\;(\sim x \wedge y).$$
We must now take the negation of the whole expression. So we write:
$$\sim\bigl(x \leftrightarrow \sim y\bigr) \;=\; \sim\Bigl[(x \wedge \sim y)\;\vee\;(\sim x \wedge y)\Bigr].$$
To push the negation inside the parentheses, we invoke De Morgan’s law, which states:
$$\sim(A \vee B)\;=\;(\sim A) \wedge (\sim B).$$
Here $$A$$ is $$x \wedge \sim y$$ and $$B$$ is $$\sim x \wedge y$$. Therefore:
$$\sim\Bigl[(x \wedge \sim y)\;\vee\;(\sim x \wedge y)\Bigr] \;=\; \bigl[\sim(x \wedge \sim y)\bigr] \;\wedge\; \bigl[\sim(\sim x \wedge y)\bigr].$$
The next step is to remove each inner negation. Again, we apply De Morgan’s law, this time in the form $$\sim(A \wedge B) = (\sim A) \vee (\sim B).$$ For the first bracket we have $$A = x$$ and $$B = \sim y$$:
$$\sim(x \wedge \sim y) \;=\; (\sim x) \;\vee\; (\sim(\sim y)) \;=\; (\sim x) \vee y.$$
For the second bracket we have $$A = \sim x$$ and $$B = y$$:
$$\sim(\sim x \wedge y) \;=\; (\sim(\sim x)) \;\vee\; (\sim y) \;=\; x \vee (\sim y).$$
So the entire expression is now
$$\bigl[(\sim x) \vee y\bigr] \;\wedge\; \bigl[x \vee (\sim y)\bigr].$$
To simplify, we distribute the conjunction across the disjunctions. The distributive law tells us:
$$(A \vee B)\wedge(C \vee D) \;=\; (A \wedge C)\;\vee\;(A \wedge D)\;\vee\;(B \wedge C)\;\vee\;(B \wedge D).$$
Letting $$A = \sim x,\; B = y,\; C = x,\; D = \sim y,$$ we compute each product term one by one:
1. $$(\sim x) \wedge x = \text{False},$$ because a proposition and its negation cannot both be true.
2. $$(\sim x) \wedge (\sim y) = \sim x \wedge \sim y.$$
3. $$y \wedge x = x \wedge y.$$
4. $$y \wedge (\sim y) = \text{False},$$ again because a variable and its negation cannot both be true.
Combining the surviving non-false terms under disjunction gives:
$$(\sim x \wedge \sim y)\;\vee\;(x \wedge y).$$
Conventionally we write the positive term first, so we obtain the final simplified negation as:
$$ (x \wedge y)\;\vee\;(\sim x \wedge \sim y). $$
Now we match this with the options provided. Option B is exactly
$$(x \wedge y) \vee (\sim x \wedge \sim y).$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option 2.
The proposition $$p \to \sim(p \wedge \sim q)$$ is equivalent to:
We have to simplify the proposition $$p \to \sim(p \wedge \sim q)$$ and then compare the final result with the four given options.
First recall the logical equivalence for an implication. The standard formula is:
$$a \to b \equiv (\sim a) \vee b.$$
In our problem the role of $$a$$ is played by $$p$$ and the role of $$b$$ is played by $$\sim(p \wedge \sim q).$$ Substituting into the formula we obtain
$$p \to \sim(p \wedge \sim q) \equiv (\sim p) \vee \bigl[\;\sim(p \wedge \sim q)\bigr].$$
Now we tackle the term $$\sim(p \wedge \sim q)$$. To simplify a negation of a conjunction, we use De Morgan’s law, which states:
$$\sim(A \wedge B) \equiv (\sim A) \vee (\sim B).$$
Here $$A$$ is $$p$$ and $$B$$ is $$\sim q$$. Applying the law carefully gives
$$\sim(p \wedge \sim q) \equiv (\sim p) \vee \bigl[\sim(\sim q)\bigr].$$
A double negation disappears, because $$\sim(\sim q) \equiv q$$. Hence the entire right-hand side becomes
$$\sim(p \wedge \sim q) \equiv (\sim p) \vee q.$$
We now substitute this back into the expression we obtained after the implication step:
$$(\sim p) \vee \bigl[\;\sim(p \wedge \sim q)\bigr] \equiv (\sim p) \vee \bigl[(\sim p) \vee q\bigr].$$
The disjunction is associative and idempotent, meaning that repeating the same statement inside a string of ORs does not change the result. Explicitly,
$$ (\sim p) \vee (\sim p) \equiv \sim p, \quad\text{and}\quad (\sim p) \vee \bigl[(\sim p) \vee q\bigr] \equiv (\sim p) \vee q.$$
Therefore the original proposition simplifies all the way down to
$$p \to \sim(p \wedge \sim q) \equiv (\sim p) \vee q.$$
This final expression matches exactly what is written in Option B. Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Which one of the following is a tautology?
We want to know which of the given compound statements is a tautology, that is, which statement is always true no matter which truth-values (T or F) we assign to the simple propositions $$p$$ and $$q$$. The straightforward way is to construct truth-tables for every option, but often we can save time by using well-known logical equivalences. Nevertheless, for absolute clarity we shall give every algebraic step and also exhibit at least one counter-example for all the non-tautological options.
First recall some standard logical facts that we shall need:
1. Implication equivalence $$p \rightarrow q \;\;\text{is equivalent to}\;\; \neg p \vee q$$ (Because an implication is false only when $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is false.)
2. Distributive, associative, commutative and absorption laws for $$\vee$$ (OR) and $$\wedge$$ (AND) behave exactly like their algebraic counterparts, but with the understanding that TRUE behaves like 1 and FALSE like 0.
3. The absorption laws that we shall use twice are $$p \vee (p \wedge q) \equiv p$$ $$p \wedge (p \vee q) \equiv p.$$ These tell us that mixing a statement with itself inside an OR or an AND does not add any new logical content: $$p$$ already captures the whole truth of the compound.
Now we treat every option one by one.
Option A : $$ (p \wedge (p \rightarrow q)) \rightarrow q $$
We start by rewriting the implication inside the antecedent ($$p \rightarrow q$$) using fact 1.
So, $$p \rightarrow q \equiv \neg p \vee q.$$
Substituting this inside the main expression gives
$$ (p \wedge (\,\neg p \vee q\,)) \rightarrow q. $$
Next we simplify the bracket $$p \wedge (\,\neg p \vee q\,)$$ by distributing $$p$$ over the parentheses:
$$ p \wedge (\,\neg p \vee q\,) \equiv (p \wedge \neg p) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q). $$
But $$p \wedge \neg p$$ is always FALSE (a contradiction), hence
$$ (p \wedge \neg p) \;\vee\; (p \wedge q) \equiv \text{FALSE} \;\vee\; (p \wedge q) \equiv p \wedge q, $$
because OR with FALSE leaves the other term unchanged.
So up to now we have reduced the whole statement to
$$ (p \wedge q) \rightarrow q. $$
Once again we use fact 1 on the outer implication, i.e.
$$ (p \wedge q) \rightarrow q \equiv \neg (p \wedge q) \;\vee\; q. $$
We apply De Morgan to the negation:
$$ \neg (p \wedge q) \equiv \neg p \vee \neg q, $$
so the expression becomes
$$ (\neg p \vee \neg q) \;\vee\; q. $$
OR is associative and commutative, therefore we can rearrange freely. We now gather the two clauses that contain $$q$$:
$$ (\neg p \vee \neg q \vee q) \equiv (\neg p \vee \text{TRUE}), $$
because $$\neg q \vee q$$ is always TRUE. And of course $$\neg p \vee \text{TRUE}$$ simplifies to TRUE (OR with TRUE is TRUE).
Thus the entire compound statement has simplified to the constant truth-value TRUE for every truth assignment to $$p$$ and $$q$$. Therefore option A is a tautology.
Option B : $$ q \rightarrow (p \wedge (p \rightarrow q)) $$
Again write $$p \rightarrow q$$ as $$\neg p \vee q$$ and substitute:
$$ q \rightarrow \bigl(p \wedge (\neg p \vee q)\bigr). $$
As in option A we know that $$p \wedge (\neg p \vee q) \equiv p \wedge q.$$ So we obtain
$$ q \rightarrow (p \wedge q). $$
This implication is equivalent to $$\neg q \vee (p \wedge q).$$ Now choose a valuation with $$q = \text{T}$$ and $$p = \text{F}.$$ Then $$\neg q = \text{F}$$ and $$p \wedge q = \text{F}$$, so the whole expression evaluates to FALSE. Hence option B is not a tautology.
Option C : $$ p \wedge (p \vee q) $$
Using the absorption law stated earlier, we get directly
$$ p \wedge (p \vee q) \equiv p. $$
The value of $$p$$ obviously depends on our choice of truth-values; it is TRUE for $$p = \text{T}$$ and FALSE for $$p = \text{F}$$. Therefore this compound statement sometimes becomes FALSE, so it is not a tautology.
Option D : $$ p \vee (p \wedge q) $$
This is the other absorption law:
$$ p \vee (p \wedge q) \equiv p. $$
Again the truth of the whole expression varies with the truth of $$p$$, so option D is not a tautology.
After examining every choice we see that only option A is always TRUE, i.e. is a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$A, B, C$$ and $$D$$ be four non-empty sets. The contrapositive statement of "If $$A \subseteq B$$ and $$B \subseteq D$$, then $$A \subseteq C$$" is
We begin with the given conditional statement:
$$\text{If }A \subseteq B\text{ and }B \subseteq D,\text{ then }A \subseteq C.$$
This has the usual “If-then” logical structure. For clarity, let us assign symbols to the two parts of the statement:
$$P : A \subseteq B \text{ and } B \subseteq D,$$
$$Q : A \subseteq C.$$
So the original statement is of the form $$P \rightarrow Q.$$
Now we recall the logical rule for the contrapositive. For any implication $$P \rightarrow Q,$$ the contrapositive is obtained by negating both parts and reversing the direction:
$$P \rightarrow Q \;\; \text{is equivalent to} \;\; \lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P.$$
Applying this rule, we first negate $$Q$$:
$$Q = A \subseteq C \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \lnot Q = A \nsubseteq C.$$
Next, we negate $$P$$. Since $$P$$ itself is a conjunction, we must use De Morgan’s law:
$$P = (A \subseteq B) \land (B \subseteq D).$$
According to De Morgan’s law, the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations:
$$\lnot P = \lnot\big[(A \subseteq B) \land (B \subseteq D)\big]$$
$$\phantom{\lnot P} = (A \nsubseteq B) \lor (B \nsubseteq D).$$
Combining these two results into the contrapositive form $$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P,$$ we obtain:
$$\text{If }A \nsubseteq C,\text{ then }(A \nsubseteq B)\text{ or }(B \nsubseteq D).$$
Comparing this with the options given, we see it matches exactly with Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$\bigcup_{i=1}^{50} X_i = \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} Y_i = T$$, where each $$X_i$$ contains 10 elements and each $$Y_i$$ contains 5 elements. If each element of the set $$T$$ is an element of exactly 20 of sets $$X_i$$'s and exactly 6 of sets $$Y_i$$'s then $$n$$ is equal to:
Let us denote the number of distinct elements in the union by $$|T|$$. We begin with the family $$\{X_1,X_2,\dots ,X_{50}\}$$.
Each set $$X_i$$ contains 10 elements, so the total of all ordered pairs “(set, element in that set)” contributed by the 50 sets equals
$$\sum_{i=1}^{50}|X_i| \;=\;50\times 10 \;=\;500.$$
However, the statement tells us that every single element of $$T$$ lies in exactly 20 of the $$X_i$$’s. Hence, if we count the same ordered pairs by first choosing an element of $$T$$ and then choosing the set $$X_i$$ that contains it, we obtain
$$20\times |T|.$$
Because both computations refer to the same collection of ordered pairs, they are equal. Therefore
$$20\times |T| = 500 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; |T|=\frac{500}{20}=25.$$
Now we turn to the family $$\{Y_1,Y_2,\dots ,Y_n\}$$. Each $$Y_i$$ has 5 elements, so the total number of ordered pairs “(set, element in that set)” here is
$$\sum_{i=1}^{n}|Y_i| \;=\;n\times 5 \;=\;5n.$$
Again, the problem states that every element of $$T$$ appears in exactly 6 of the $$Y_i$$’s. Counting by first picking an element and then one of the 6 sets that contain it gives
$$6\times |T| = 6\times 25 = 150.$$
Equating the two counts for the $$Y_i$$ family, we have
$$5n = 150 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; n = \frac{150}{5}=30.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
The statement $$(p \to (q \to p)) \to (p \to (p \vee q))$$ is:
We have to decide the logical nature of the formula $$S=(p\to(q\to p))\to(p\to(p\vee q)).$$
First, we recall the standard implication-disjunction equivalence:
$$a\to b\;\equiv\;\sim a\;\vee\;b.$$
We apply this rule to the innermost implication $$q\to p.$$
So, $$q\to p\;\equiv\;\sim q\;\vee\;p.$$
Substituting this result back into the left part of $$S$$ we get
$$p\to(q\to p)\;\equiv\;p\to(\sim q\vee p).$$
Once again using the same rule $$a\to b\equiv\sim a\vee b$$ on the implication whose antecedent is $$p$$, we have
$$p\to(\sim q\vee p)\;\equiv\;\sim p\;\vee\;(\sim q\;\vee\;p).$$
Now we re-arrange the disjunction because disjunction is associative and commutative:
$$\sim p\;\vee\;(\sim q\;\vee\;p)\;=\;(\sim p\;\vee\;p)\;\vee\;\sim q.$$
We know that the law of excluded middle tells us $$\sim p\;\vee\;p\equiv \text{True}.$$ Therefore,
$$(\sim p\;\vee\;p)\;\vee\;\sim q\;\equiv\;\text{True}\;\vee\;\sim q\;\equiv\;\text{True}.$$
Hence, the whole sub-formula $$p\to(q\to p)$$ is always true; it is a tautology. We can now write
$$p\to(q\to p)\;\equiv\;\text{True}.$$
Next, we turn to the right part of $$S$$, namely $$p\to(p\vee q).$$ Again we use $$a\to b\equiv\sim a\vee b.$$ So,
$$p\to(p\vee q)\;\equiv\;\sim p\;\vee\;(p\vee q).$$
Associating the disjunctions yields
$$\sim p\;\vee\;p\;\vee\;q.$$
By the law of excluded middle, $$\sim p\;\vee\;p\equiv\text{True},$$ hence
$$\sim p\;\vee\;p\;\vee\;q\;\equiv\;\text{True}\;\vee\;q\;\equiv\;\text{True}.$$
Therefore, the consequent $$(p\to(p\vee q))$$ is also a tautology. We can thus rewrite $$S$$ purely in terms of truth values:
$$S\;\equiv\;(\text{True})\;\to\;(\text{True}).$$
Finally, we know that $$\text{True}\to\text{True}\equiv\text{True},$$ because an implication with a true antecedent and a true consequent is true.
So the entire statement $$S$$ is always true for every possible truth-value assignment of $$p$$ and $$q$$. That is, $$S$$ is a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 4.
A survey shows that 73% of the persons working in an office like coffee, whereas 65% like tea. If $$x$$ denotes the percentage of them, who like both coffee and tea, then $$x$$ cannot be:
We are told that out of all employees in an office, $$73\%$$ like coffee and $$65\%$$ like tea. Let us denote by $$x\%$$ the employees who like both coffee and tea.
To connect these three percentages, we recall the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion for two sets. For any two sets $$A$$ and $$B$$, it states
$$|A\cup B|=|A|+|B|-|A\cap B|.$$
In our context,
$$$|A|=73\%, \qquad |B|=65\%, \qquad |A\cap B|=x\%.$$$
Hence the percentage of employees who like at least one of the two beverages is
$$$|A\cup B| = 73 + 65 - x = 138 - x\;(\%).$$$
This quantity obviously cannot exceed the total population, which is $$100\%.$$ Therefore, we must have
$$138 - x \le 100.$$
Solving this simple linear inequality step by step, we move all the terms involving $$x$$ to one side:
$$$138 - x \le 100 \\ \Rightarrow -x \le 100 - 138 \\ \Rightarrow -x \le -38.$$$
Now dividing both sides by $$-1$$ (and remembering to reverse the inequality sign), we get
$$x \ge 38.$$
This is our lower bound: the overlap $$x\%$$ must be at least $$38\%.$$
Next, the overlap cannot exceed either of the individual percentages, because the intersection of two sets can never be larger than each set alone. Thus we have two more inequalities:
$$x \le 73 \quad\text{and}\quad x \le 65.$$
The tighter of these two upper bounds is $$65\%,$$ so altogether we have the admissible range
$$38 \le x \le 65.$$
Now we examine the four candidate values:
$$$\begin{aligned} \text{Option A: }&63 &&\text{lies between }38\text{ and }65\ (\text{allowed}),\\ \text{Option B: }&36 &&\text{is }<38\ (\text{not allowed}),\\ \text{Option C: }&54 &&\text{lies between }38\text{ and }65\ (\text{allowed}),\\ \text{Option D: }&38 &&\text{equals the lower bound }38\ (\text{allowed}).\\ \end{aligned}$$$
Thus the only percentage that violates the necessary condition is $$36\%.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
For a suitably chosen real constant $$a$$, let a function, $$f : \mathbb{R} - \{-a\} \to \mathbb{R}$$ be defined by $$f(x) = \frac{a-x}{a+x}$$. Further suppose that for any real number $$x \neq -a$$, and $$f(x) \neq -a$$, $$(f \circ f)(x) = x$$. Then $$f\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)$$ is equal to:
First we recall that the composite function $$(f \circ f)(x)$$ means “apply $$f$$ twice”, i.e. $$(f \circ f)(x)=f\bigl(f(x)\bigr).$$ The statement of the question says that this composite equals $$x$$ itself. Symbolically, for every real $$x \neq -a$$ with $$f(x)\neq -a,$$ we have the requirement
$$f\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=x.$$
Such a function is called an involution. We shall use this condition to determine the constant $$a$$ and then evaluate $$f\!\left(-\dfrac12\right).$$
The given function is
$$f(x)=\dfrac{a-x}{\,a+x\,}.$$
We first compute $$y=f(x):$$
$$y=\dfrac{a-x}{a+x}.$$
Now we apply $$f$$ again, replacing its argument by $$y$$. Thus
$$f\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=\dfrac{a-y}{\,a+y\,}.$$
Substituting $$y=\dfrac{a-x}{a+x}$$ we obtain
$$f\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=\dfrac{a-\dfrac{a-x}{a+x}}{\,a+\dfrac{a-x}{a+x}\,}.$$
To simplify, we bring every term over the common denominator $$(a+x).$$ For the numerator:
$$a-\dfrac{a-x}{a+x}=\dfrac{a(a+x)-(a-x)}{a+x}=\dfrac{a^2+ax-a+x}{a+x}.$$
Collecting like terms gives
$$a^2+ax-a+x=a^2-a+x(a+1).$$
So the numerator equals
$$\dfrac{a^2-a+x(a+1)}{a+x}.$$
For the denominator:
$$a+\dfrac{a-x}{a+x}=\dfrac{a(a+x)+(a-x)}{a+x}=\dfrac{a^2+ax+a-x}{a+x}.$$
Collecting like terms gives
$$a^2+ax+a-x=a^2+a+x(a-1).$$
Hence the denominator equals
$$\dfrac{a^2+a+x(a-1)}{a+x}.$$
Therefore
$$f\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=\dfrac{\dfrac{a^2-a+x(a+1)}{a+x}}{\dfrac{a^2+a+x(a-1)}{a+x}}=\dfrac{a^2-a+x(a+1)}{a^2+a+x(a-1)}.$$
The requirement $$f\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=x$$ now becomes the identity
$$\dfrac{a^2-a+x(a+1)}{a^2+a+x(a-1)}=x \quad \text{for all admissible } x.$$
Cross-multiplying (which is valid because denominators are non-zero away from the excluded points) we get
$$a^2-a+x(a+1)=x\bigl[a^2+a+x(a-1)\bigr].$$
Expanding the right-hand side yields
$$a^2-a+x(a+1)=a^2x+ax+(a-1)x^2.$$
Now we bring every term to the right so that the left side becomes zero, collecting like powers of $$x$$:
$$0=a^2x+ax+(a-1)x^2-\bigl(a^2-a+ax+x\bigr).$$
Distributing the negative sign and combining terms one by one, we obtain
$$0=\underbrace{(a-1)}_{\text{coefficient of }x^2}x^2+\underbrace{\bigl(a^2-1\bigr)}_{\text{coefficient of }x}x+\underbrace{\bigl(-a(a-1)\bigr)}_{\text{constant term}}.$$
For the polynomial to be identically zero for all real $$x,$$ each individual coefficient must vanish:
$$a-1=0,\qquad a^2-1=0,\qquad -a(a-1)=0.$$
The first of these directly gives $$a=1.$$ Substituting $$a=1$$ into the second and third equations confirms that they are also satisfied. Thus the only admissible constant is
$$a=1.$$
With this value, the original function becomes
$$f(x)=\dfrac{1-x}{\,1+x\,}.$$
We are required to evaluate $$f\!\left(-\dfrac12\right).$$ Substituting $$x=-\dfrac12$$ gives
$$f\!\left(-\dfrac12\right)=\dfrac{1-\left(-\dfrac12\right)}{1+\left(-\dfrac12\right)}=\dfrac{1+\dfrac12}{1-\dfrac12}=\dfrac{\dfrac32}{\dfrac12}.$$
Dividing the two fractions, we obtain
$$f\!\left(-\dfrac12\right)=\dfrac32 \times \dfrac21=3.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
If $$g(x) = x^2 + x - 1$$ and $$(g \circ f)(x) = 4x^2 - 10x + 5$$, then $$f\left(\frac{5}{4}\right)$$ is equal to
We have $$g(x)=x^2+x-1$$ and the composition $$\bigl(g\circ f\bigr)(x)=g\!\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=4x^2-10x+5.$$
Writing $$y=f(x),$$ the definition of composition gives us
$$g\!\bigl(f(x)\bigr)=g(y)=y^2+y-1.$$
But by the statement of the problem the same quantity also equals $$4x^2-10x+5.$$ Hence we must have
$$y^2+y-1=4x^2-10x+5.$$
Substituting back $$y=f(x)$$ we get a quadratic equation in $$f(x):$$
$$\bigl(f(x)\bigr)^2+f(x)-1=4x^2-10x+5.$$
Now we bring every term to the left‐hand side:
$$\bigl(f(x)\bigr)^2+f(x)-1-4x^2+10x-5=0,$$
so
$$\bigl(f(x)\bigr)^2+f(x)-4x^2+10x-6=0.$$
This is a quadratic in the unknown $$f(x).$$ For a quadratic $$at^2+bt+c=0$$ the roots are given by the quadratic formula $$t=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{\,b^2-4ac\,}}{2a}.$$
Here $$a=1,\;b=1,\;c=-4x^2+10x-6,$$ so
$$f(x)=\dfrac{-1\pm\sqrt{\,1-4\bigl(-4x^2+10x-6\bigr)\,}}{2}.$$
Inside the square root we simplify step by step:
$$1-4\bigl(-4x^2+10x-6\bigr)=1+16x^2-40x+24.$$
Combining like terms gives
$$16x^2-40x+25.$$
Recognising a perfect square, we note $$16x^2-40x+25=(4x-5)^2.$$ Hence
$$f(x)=\dfrac{-1\pm|4x-5|}{2}.$$
The two possible expressions that come out are obtained very easily:
If $$|4x-5|=4x-5$$ we get $$f(x)=\dfrac{-1+(4x-5)}{2}=2x-3,$$ and if $$|4x-5|=5-4x$$ we get $$f(x)=\dfrac{-1+(5-4x)}{2}=2-2x.$$
Thus for every $$x$$ the value of $$f(x)$$ is either $$2x-3$$ or $$2-2x.$$ Both of these, when put back into $$g(x),$$ reproduce $$4x^2-10x+5,$$ so the composition condition is satisfied in either case.
Now we specifically need $$f\!\left(\dfrac54\right).$$ Substituting $$x=\dfrac54$$ in either expression:
Using $$f(x)=2x-3,$$ we get $$f\!\left(\dfrac54\right)=2\left(\dfrac54\right)-3=\dfrac{10}{4}-3=\dfrac{5}{2}-3=-\dfrac12.$$
Using $$f(x)=2-2x,$$ we get $$f\!\left(\dfrac54\right)=2-2\left(\dfrac54\right)=2-\dfrac{10}{4}=2-\dfrac{5}{2}=-\dfrac12.$$
Both routes give the same numerical answer, so unambiguously
$$f\!\left(\dfrac54\right)=-\dfrac12.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$f : (1, 3) \rightarrow R$$, be a function defined by $$f(x) = \frac{x[x]}{1+x^2}$$, where $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer $$\le x$$. Then the range of $$f$$, is
We have the function $$f:(1,3)\rightarrow \mathbb R$$ defined by
$$f(x)=\dfrac{x\,[x]}{1+x^{2}},$$
where $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$. Because the domain is the open interval $$(1,3)$$, the only possible integer values of $$[x]$$ inside this interval are $$1$$ and $$2$$. So we split the domain into two parts.
First part - when $$1<x<2$$ we have $$[x]=1$$. Substituting this in the formula gives
$$f(x)=\dfrac{x\cdot1}{1+x^{2}}=\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}\qquad(1<x<2).$$
To find its range we differentiate. Using the quotient rule $$\displaystyle\left(\dfrac{u}{v}\right)'=\dfrac{u'v-uv'}{v^{2}},$$ with $$u=x,\;u'=1,\;v=1+x^{2},\;v' = 2x,$$ we get
$$f'(x)=\dfrac{1(1+x^{2})-x(2x)}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}=\dfrac{1+x^{2}-2x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}=\dfrac{1-x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}.$$
Inside the interval $$1<x<2$$ we have $$x^{2}>1$$, so $$1-x^{2}<0$$ and hence $$f'(x)<0$$. Thus $$f(x)=\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}$$ is strictly decreasing on $$(1,2)$$.
Because it is decreasing, its largest value occurs as $$x\to1^{+}$$ and its smallest value occurs as $$x\to2^{-}$$. Evaluating the limits,
$$\lim_{x\to1^{+}}\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}=\dfrac{1}{1+1}=\dfrac12,$$
$$\lim_{x\to2^{-}}\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}=\dfrac{2}{1+4}=\dfrac25.$$
Neither endpoint is actually in the open interval $$(1,2)$$, so neither value is attained. Therefore the range of the first part is
$$\left(\dfrac25,\;\dfrac12\right).$$
Second part - when $$2\le x<3$$ we have $$[x]=2$$. So now
$$f(x)=\dfrac{x\cdot2}{1+x^{2}}=\dfrac{2x}{1+x^{2}}\qquad(2\le x<3).$$
Again we differentiate. Put $$u=2x,\;u'=2,\;v=1+x^{2},\;v'=2x,$$ then
$$f'(x)=\dfrac{2(1+x^{2})-2x(2x)}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}=\dfrac{2+2x^{2}-4x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}=\dfrac{2-2x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}=\dfrac{2(1-x^{2})}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}.$$
On the interval $$2\le x<3$$ we have $$x^{2}>1$$, so again $$1-x^{2}<0$$ and hence $$f'(x)<0$$ throughout. Thus $$f(x)=\dfrac{2x}{1+x^{2}}$$ is also strictly decreasing on $$[2,3)$$.
The largest value of this part is taken at the left end $$x=2$$ (which is in the domain), and the smallest value is approached as $$x\to3^{-}$$. Compute
$$f(2)=\dfrac{2\cdot2}{1+2^{2}}=\dfrac{4}{1+4}=\dfrac45,$$
$$\lim_{x\to3^{-}}\dfrac{2x}{1+x^{2}}=\dfrac{2\cdot3}{1+3^{2}}=\dfrac{6}{10}=\dfrac35.$$
The value $$\dfrac45$$ is included because $$x=2$$ belongs to the domain; the value $$\dfrac35$$ is not included because $$x=3$$ is not in the domain. Hence the range of the second part is
$$\left(\dfrac35,\;\dfrac45\right].$$
Combining both parts we unite their ranges:
$$\left(\dfrac25,\;\dfrac12\right)\;\cup\;\left(\dfrac35,\;\dfrac45\right].$$
This set matches exactly the interval collection given in Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ be two relations defined as follows:
$$R_1 = \{(a, b) \in R^2 : a^2 + b^2 \in Q\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(a, b) \in R^2 : a^2 + b^2 \notin Q\}$$, where Q is the set of all rational numbers, then
We have two relations on the set of real numbers $$\mathbb R$$.
$$R_1=\{(a,b)\in\mathbb R^2 : a^2+b^2\in\mathbb Q\}$$
$$R_2=\{(a,b)\in\mathbb R^2 : a^2+b^2\notin\mathbb Q\}$$
To decide which of the two relations is transitive, recall the definition of transitivity:
A relation $$R$$ on a set is transitive if and only if
$$ (a,b)\in R \;\text{and}\; (b,c)\in R \;\Longrightarrow\; (a,c)\in R \quad\text{for every}\; a,b,c. $$
First we check $$R_1$$. Assume $$(a,b)\in R_1$$ and $$(b,c)\in R_1.$$ So
$$a^2+b^2\in\mathbb Q\quad\text{and}\quad b^2+c^2\in\mathbb Q.$$
It does not automatically follow that $$a^2+c^2$$ is rational. Indeed we exhibit three concrete numbers that break the implication.
Select
$$b^2=\sqrt2,\qquad a^2=5-\sqrt2,\qquad c^2=5-\sqrt2.$$
Because $$5-\sqrt2>0,$$ the square-roots exist in $$\mathbb R$$, so put
$$a=\sqrt{\,5-\sqrt2\,},\quad b=\sqrt[\,4]2,\quad c=\sqrt{\,5-\sqrt2\,}.$$
Now compute the three sums of squares:
$$a^2+b^2=(5-\sqrt2)+\sqrt2=5\in\mathbb Q,$$
$$b^2+c^2=\sqrt2+(5-\sqrt2)=5\in\mathbb Q,$$
$$a^2+c^2=(5-\sqrt2)+(5-\sqrt2)=10-2\sqrt2\notin\mathbb Q.$$
Thus $$(a,b)\in R_1,\;(b,c)\in R_1$$ but $$(a,c)\notin R_1.$$ Therefore $$R_1$$ is not transitive.
Next we examine $$R_2$$. Again start with two pairs in the relation and see whether the third one must follow. Choose
$$a=1,\qquad b=\sqrt\pi,\qquad c=2.$$
We have
$$a^2=1\in\mathbb Q,\qquad b^2=\pi\notin\mathbb Q,\qquad c^2=4\in\mathbb Q.$$
Calculate the relevant sums:
$$a^2+b^2=1+\pi\notin\mathbb Q\;\Longrightarrow\;(a,b)\in R_2,$$
$$b^2+c^2=\pi+4\notin\mathbb Q\;\Longrightarrow\;(b,c)\in R_2,$$
$$a^2+c^2=1+4=5\in\mathbb Q\;\Longrightarrow\;(a,c)\notin R_2.$$
Hence $$(a,b)\in R_2$$ and $$(b,c)\in R_2$$ do not force $$(a,c)\in R_2$$. So $$R_2$$ also fails to be transitive.
We have shown that neither of the two relations satisfies the transitivity condition. Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Which of the following is a tautology?
We recall that a statement is called a tautology when it remains true for every possible truth-value assignment of its component propositions. We shall examine each option one by one, reducing the compound statement with standard logical identities and looking for a possible counter-example. If even a single assignment makes the statement false, then it is not a tautology.
We begin with Option A:
$$ (\sim p)\;\wedge\;(p \vee q)\;\to\; q $$
First we simplify the antecedent "$$(\sim p)\wedge (p\vee q)$$". Using the distributive law
$$ a\wedge(b\vee c)\;=\;(a\wedge b)\;\vee\;(a\wedge c), $$
with $$a=\sim p,\; b=p,\; c=q,$$ we obtain
$$ (\sim p)\wedge(p\vee q)\;=\;[(\sim p)\wedge p] \;\vee\;[(\sim p)\wedge q]. $$
Now $$ (\sim p)\wedge p $$ is a contradiction, i.e. it is always false, so it may be dropped from the disjunction:
$$ (\sim p)\wedge(p\vee q)\;=\;(\sim p)\wedge q. $$
Therefore Option A becomes
$$ [(\sim p)\wedge q]\;\to\;q. $$
Next we recall the definition of implication:
$$ a\to b\;\equiv\;\sim a\;\vee\;b. $$
Replacing $$a$$ with $$ (\sim p)\wedge q $$ and $$b$$ with $$q$$ gives
$$ [(\sim p)\wedge q]\;\to\;q\;\equiv\;\sim[(\sim p)\wedge q]\;\vee\;q. $$
Apply De Morgan’s law to the negation inside:
$$ \sim[(\sim p)\wedge q]\;=\;\sim(\sim p)\;\vee\;\sim q\;=\;p\;\vee\;\sim q. $$
So the whole expression is
$$ (p\;\vee\;\sim q)\;\vee\;q. $$
The associative and commutative laws for disjunction permit us to regroup and obtain
$$ p\;\vee\;(q\;\vee\;\sim q). $$
Within the parentheses, $$ q\;\vee\;\sim q $$ is the law of excluded middle, which is always true, i.e. a tautology $$T$$. Hence we have
$$ p\;\vee\;T\;=\;T. $$
Thus Option A simplifies to a statement that is invariably true, making it a tautology.
Now we test Option B:
$$ (q\to p)\;\vee\;\sim(p\to q). $$
First expand each implication using $$a\to b \equiv \sim a\;\vee\;b$$:
$$ (q\to p) = (\sim q)\;\vee\;p, \qquad (p\to q) = (\sim p)\;\vee\;q.$$ Hence
$$ \sim(p\to q) = \sim[(\sim p)\vee q] = p\wedge\sim q $$ by De Morgan’s law. Therefore Option B becomes
$$ (\sim q\;\vee\;p)\;\vee\;(p\wedge\sim q). $$
We look for a truth-value combination that makes the whole disjunction false. A disjunction is false only when each of its components is false. So we need
$$ \sim q\;\vee\;p = F, \quad\text{and}\quad p\wedge\sim q = F. $$
Take $$p = F$$ and $$q = T$$. Then
$$\sim q = F,\quad p = F,\quad \therefore \sim q\;\vee\;p = F.$$ Also $$p\wedge\sim q = F\wedge F = F.$$ Both parts are false, so the entire statement is false for this assignment. Hence Option B is not a tautology.
Next we inspect Option C:
$$ (\sim q)\;\vee\;(p\wedge q)\;\to\;q. $$
Choose $$q = F$$ (i.e. $$q$$ is false). Then $$\sim q = T$$, so the antecedent $$(\sim q)\;\vee\;(p\wedge q)$$ is true irrespective of $$p$$. The consequent $$q$$, however, is false. Therefore the implication becomes $$T\to F,$$ which is false. So Option C is also not a tautology.
Finally Option D:
$$ (p\to q)\;\wedge\;(q\to p). $$
This is logically equivalent to the biconditional $$p\leftrightarrow q,$$ which is true only when $$p$$ and $$q$$ share the same truth value. Take $$p = T,\, q = F$$. Then $$p\to q = F$$, so the whole conjunction is false. Consequently Option D is not a tautology.
Only Option A survives every test and is always true.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The inverse function of $$f(x) = \frac{8^{2x} - 8^{-2x}}{8^{2x} + 8^{-2x}}$$, $$x \in (-1, 1)$$, is
Let us begin by writing the given relation in a form that can be inverted. We put
$$y \;=\; f(x)\;=\;\frac{8^{2x}-8^{-2x}}{8^{2x}+8^{-2x}},\qquad x\in(-1,1).$$
To clear the negative exponent we multiply the numerator and the denominator by $$8^{2x}$$. This gives
$$y \;=\;\frac{8^{2x}\!\cdot\!8^{2x}\;-\;1}{8^{2x}\!\cdot\!8^{2x}\;+\;1}\;=\;\frac{8^{4x}-1}{8^{4x}+1}.$$
Now we eliminate the fraction by cross-multiplication:
$$y\bigl(8^{4x}+1\bigr)=8^{4x}-1.$$
Expanding the left side we obtain
$$y\cdot8^{4x}+y \;=\;8^{4x}-1.$$
We bring all terms containing $$8^{4x}$$ to one side and the constants to the other side:
$$y\cdot8^{4x}-8^{4x} \;=\;-1-y.$$
Factoring out $$8^{4x}$$ on the left gives
$$8^{4x}(y-1)\;=\;-(1+y).$$
We divide by $$y-1$$ (remembering that $$y\neq1$$ inside the interval of definition) and, at the same time, remove the minus sign from numerator and denominator:
$$8^{4x}\;=\;\frac{-(1+y)}{\,y-1\,}\;=\;\frac{1+y}{1-y}.$$
The base-exponent form $$a^m=b$$ can always be rewritten as the logarithmic form $$m=\log_a b$$. Applying this rule with base $$8$$ we take logarithm base $$8$$ of both sides:
$$4x\;=\;\log_8\!\left(\frac{1+y}{1-y}\right).$$
Dividing by $$4$$ produces
$$x\;=\;\frac14\,\log_8\!\left(\frac{1+y}{1-y}\right).$$
Up to this point $$y$$ was the original output and $$x$$ was the original input. For the inverse function we interchange their roles, writing the final answer as
$$f^{-1}(x)\;=\;\frac14\,\log_8\!\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right).$$
This expression exactly matches Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$A = \{a, b, c\}$$ and $$B = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$. Then the number of elements in the set $$C = \{f : A \to B \mid 2 \in f(A)$$ and $$f$$ is not one-one$$\}$$ is...
We have $$A = \{a,\; b,\; c\}$$ so $$|A| = 3$$, and $$B = \{1,\; 2,\; 3,\; 4\}$$ so $$|B| = 4$$. A function $$f : A \to B$$ assigns to every element of $$A$$ exactly one element of $$B$$.
First, recall that the total number of all possible functions from a set with $$m$$ elements to a set with $$n$$ elements is $$n^{\,m}$$ because each element of the domain has $$n$$ independent choices. Here, $$m = 3$$ and $$n = 4$$, so the total number of functions is
$$4^{\,3} = 64.$$
We are interested only in those functions which satisfy two simultaneous conditions:
(i) $$2 \in f(A)\;,$$ meaning that at least one element of $$A$$ is mapped to $$2$$.
(ii) $$f$$ is not one-one (not injective), i.e. at least two elements of $$A$$ share the same image.
We shall count functions satisfying (i) first, then remove those that violate (ii). Let us denote by $$N_1$$ the number of functions satisfying (i) and by $$N_{1,\,\text{inj}}$$ the number of those functions which are also injective. The desired count will therefore be
$$N = N_1 \;-\; N_{1,\,\text{inj}}.$$
Counting $$N_1$$ - functions with $$2$$ in the image.
Consider the complementary set of functions where $$2$$ never appears. For every element of $$A$$ we then have only $$\{1,3,4\}$$ available, that is $$3$$ choices per element. Hence the number of such functions is
$$3^{\,3} = 27.$$
By subtraction, the number of functions that do include $$2$$ is
$$N_1 = 64 \;-\; 27 = 37.$$
Counting $$N_{1,\,\text{inj}}$$ - injective functions with $$2$$ in the image.
A function from a set of $$3$$ elements to a set of $$4$$ elements is injective exactly when it assigns three distinct images. The total number of injective functions is therefore the number of permutations of any $$3$$ distinct elements chosen from $$4$$, which is the permutation number
$$P(4,3) = 4 \times 3 \times 2 = 24.$$
Among these, let us identify how many avoid the value $$2$$ entirely; such functions must use the three values $$1,3,4$$. There is only one way to choose these three values, and they can be arranged in $$P(3,3) = 3 \times 2 \times 1 = 6$$ ways. Hence
$$\text{Injective functions without }2 = 6.$$
Consequently, the injective functions that do contain $$2$$ are
$$N_{1,\,\text{inj}} = 24 \;-\; 6 = 18.$$
Final subtraction.
We now exclude these $$18$$ injective functions from the $$37$$ functions that contain $$2$$:
$$N = 37 \;-\; 18 = 19.$$
So, the answer is $$19$$.
Let $$X = \{n \in N : 1 \le n \le 50\}$$. If $$A = \{n \in X : n \text{ is a multiple of } 2\}$$ and $$B = \{n \in X : n \text{ is a multiple of } 7\}$$, then the number of elements in the smallest subset of X, containing both A and B, is
We begin by fixing the universal set. By definition we have $$X=\{n\in\mathbb N:1\le n\le 50\}\,.$$ Thus every natural number from $$1$$ to $$50$$ is in $$X$$.
Next we describe the two given subsets. The first is
$$A=\{n\in X:n\text{ is a multiple of }2\}\,,$$
while the second is
$$B=\{n\in X:n\text{ is a multiple of }7\}\,.$$
The problem asks for the number of elements in the smallest subset of $$X$$ that contains both $$A$$ and $$B$$. The smallest set that contains two sets is simply their union, written $$A\cup B$$. Therefore we need to calculate the cardinality (number of elements) of $$A\cup B$$.
To find $$|A\cup B|$$ we use the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion, which states
$$|A\cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A\cap B|.$$ Here $$|A|$$ is the number of multiples of $$2$$ in $$X$$, $$|B|$$ is the number of multiples of $$7$$ in $$X$$, and $$|A\cap B|$$ is the number of numbers that are multiples of both $$2$$ and $$7$$, that is, multiples of the least common multiple $$\operatorname{lcm}(2,7)=14$$.
We evaluate each term separately.
Counting |A|: A number is in $$A$$ exactly when it is of the form $$2k$$ with $$1\le 2k\le 50$$. Dividing the inequality by $$2$$ gives $$1\le k\le 25$$, so there are $$25$$ such integers. Hence $$|A|=25$$.
Counting |B|: A number is in $$B$$ exactly when it is of the form $$7m$$ with $$1\le 7m\le 50$$. Dividing by $$7$$ yields $$1\le m\le 7$$ (since $$7\times7=49\le50$$ but $$7\times8=56>50$$). Thus $$|B|=7$$.
Counting |A∩B|: A number lies in the intersection $$A\cap B$$ precisely when it is simultaneously a multiple of $$2$$ and of $$7$$, meaning it is a multiple of $$14$$. Write such a number as $$14r$$ with $$1\le 14r\le 50$$. Dividing by $$14$$ gives $$1\le r\le 3$$ (since $$14\times3=42$$ is allowed but $$14\times4=56>50$$). Therefore $$|A\cap B|=3$$.
Now we substitute these counts into the inclusion-exclusion formula:
$$|A\cup B| = 25 + 7 - 3 = 29.$$
This number $$29$$ is the size of the smallest subset of $$X$$ that contains every element of both $$A$$ and $$B$$.
So, the answer is $$29$$.
Set $$A$$ has $$m$$ elements and set $$B$$ has $$n$$ elements. If the total number of subsets of $$A$$ is 112 more than the total number of subsets of $$B$$, then the value of $$m \cdot n$$ is___.
We have two finite sets, set $$A$$ with $$m$$ elements and set $$B$$ with $$n$$ elements.
First, we state the basic formula: for any set containing $$r$$ elements, the total number of its subsets is $$2^{\,r}$$. This is because each element can be either “chosen” or “not chosen”, giving two possibilities per element and hence $$2 \times 2 \times \dots \times 2 = 2^{\,r}$$ possibilities in all.
Applying this formula to the two given sets, the number of subsets of $$A$$ is $$2^{\,m}$$ and the number of subsets of $$B$$ is $$2^{\,n}$$.
We are told that
$$2^{\,m} = 2^{\,n} + 112.$$
To handle the difference of two powers of two, we isolate the common factor $$2^{\,n}$$ on the right hand side. Subtracting $$2^{\,n}$$ from both sides and then factoring gives
$$2^{\,m} - 2^{\,n} = 112 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 2^{\,n}\bigl(2^{\,m-n} - 1\bigr) = 112.$$
Let us introduce a new positive integer $$k$$ defined by $$k = m - n$$. Because $$m > n$$ gives a positive difference, we have $$k \ge 1$$. Substituting $$k$$ into the previous expression, we get
$$2^{\,n}\bigl(2^{\,k} - 1\bigr) = 112.$$
The integer $$112$$ can be written in its prime-factor form:
$$112 = 16 \times 7 = 2^{4} \times 7.$$
This factorisation tells us that any power of two dividing $$112$$ must be at most $$2^{4}$$, so we must have $$2^{\,n} \le 2^{4}$$ and therefore $$n \le 4$$ (since $$n$$ is a non-negative integer).
Now we test each possible value of $$n$$ from $$0$$ to $$4$$, computing the corresponding value of $$2^{\,k} - 1$$ and checking whether it is an integer power of two.
• If $$n = 0$$, then $$2^{\,n} = 1$$ and
$$1\bigl(2^{\,k} - 1\bigr) = 112 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} - 1 = 112 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} = 113,$$ which is not a power of two. So $$n = 0$$ is impossible.
• If $$n = 1$$, then $$2^{\,n} = 2$$ and
$$2\bigl(2^{\,k} - 1\bigr) = 112 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} - 1 = 56 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} = 57,$$ and $$57$$ is not a power of two. So $$n = 1$$ is impossible.
• If $$n = 2$$, then $$2^{\,n} = 4$$ and
$$4\bigl(2^{\,k} - 1\bigr) = 112 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} - 1 = 28 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} = 29,$$ but $$29$$ is not a power of two. So $$n = 2$$ is impossible.
• If $$n = 3$$, then $$2^{\,n} = 8$$ and
$$8\bigl(2^{\,k} - 1\bigr) = 112 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} - 1 = 14 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} = 15,$$ and $$15$$ is not a power of two. So $$n = 3$$ is impossible.
• If $$n = 4$$, then $$2^{\,n} = 16$$ and
$$16\bigl(2^{\,k} - 1\bigr) = 112 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} - 1 = 7 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2^{\,k} = 8.$$
Because $$8 = 2^{3}$$ is indeed a power of two, this case works with $$k = 3$$. Therefore
$$m - n = k = 3 \;\Longrightarrow\; m = n + 3 = 4 + 3 = 7.$$
Now that we have $$m = 7$$ and $$n = 4$$, we compute the required product:
$$m \cdot n = 7 \times 4 = 28.$$
So, the answer is $$28$$.
Contrapositive of the statement "If two numbers are not equal, then their squares are not equal" is:
We begin by recalling the basic logical rule for conditional statements. For any implication of the form $$p \rightarrow q,$$ the contrapositive is obtained by first negating the conclusion $$q$$ and then making this negation the hypothesis, while simultaneously negating the original hypothesis $$p$$ and making this negation the new conclusion. Symbolically, the rule is stated as:
$$\text{If } p \rightarrow q,$$ then its contrapositive is $$\; \lnot q \rightarrow \lnot p.$$
Now we identify the parts of the given English sentence. The original statement is:
“If two numbers are not equal, then their squares are not equal.”
We translate this into symbolic form. Let
$$p : \text{“the two numbers are not equal”},$$ $$q :$$ “the squares of the two numbers are not equal” $$.$$
Thus the given statement is precisely $$p \rightarrow q.$$
To form the contrapositive, we negate $$q$$ and $$p$$ in turn:
First the negation of $$q$$ is
$$\lnot q :$$ “the squares of the two numbers are equal” $$.$$
Second the negation of $$p$$ is
$$\lnot p : \text{“the two numbers are equal”}.$$
Applying the rule $$\lnot q \rightarrow \lnot p,$$ we obtain the contrapositive sentence in everyday language:
“If the squares of two numbers are equal, then the numbers are equal.”
Now we compare this derived sentence with the options provided. Option C reads:
“If the squares of two numbers are equal, then the numbers are equal.”
This matches word for word with our contrapositive.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
For any two statement $$p$$ and $$q$$, the negative of the expression $$p \lor (\sim p \land q)$$ is:
We begin with the given propositional expression
$$E \;=\; p \,\lor\, (\sim p \,\land\, q).$$
Our task is to find the negation $$\sim E$$ and then match it with the choices. To do this comfortably, it is convenient first to simplify $$E$$ itself.
We recall the distributive law of propositional logic, stated as
$$A \,\lor\, (B \,\land\, C)\;=\; (A \,\lor\, B)\,\land\,(A \,\lor\, C).$$
Comparing, we see $$A = p,\; B = \sim p,\; C = q.$$ Substituting we obtain
$$p \,\lor\, (\sim p \,\land\, q) \;=\; (p \,\lor\, \sim p)\,\land\,(p \,\lor\, q).$$
Now, for any statement $$p$$, the expression $$p \,\lor\, \sim p$$ is always true; it is a tautology. We may therefore replace it by the propositional constant T (True):
$$ (p \,\lor\, \sim p)\,\land\,(p \,\lor\, q) \;=\; \text{T}\,\land\,(p \,\lor\, q).$$
The conjunction of a tautology with any statement leaves that statement unchanged, because T acts like the multiplicative identity in logic. Hence
$$E \;=\; p \,\lor\, q.$$
Having reduced the original expression to $$p \lor q,$$ we now negate it. For this we invoke De Morgan’s law, which states
$$\sim(A \,\lor\, B) \;=\; \sim A \,\land\, \sim B.$$
Applying the law directly with $$A = p$$ and $$B = q,$$ we get
$$\sim E \;=\; \sim(p \,\lor\, q) \;=\; \sim p \,\land\, \sim q.$$
This final form exactly matches Option C in the list.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
If the truth value of the statement $$p \to (\sim q \vee r)$$ is false F, then the truth values of the statements p, q, r are respectively
We are told that the compound statement $$p \to (\sim q \vee r)$$ has the truth value False (F).
First, recall the logical rule for an implication. The statement $$A \to B$$ is False only when its antecedent $$A$$ is True and its consequent $$B$$ is False. In every other combination, an implication is True. We now apply this rule to our given implication.
Here, the antecedent is $$p$$ and the consequent is $$(\sim q \vee r)$$. Since the whole implication is False, we must have
$$p = \text{True} \quad\text{and}\quad (\sim q \vee r) = \text{False}.$$
So we have already obtained the first truth value:
$$p = T.$$
Next, we analyze the consequent $$(\sim q \vee r).$$ This is a disjunction (“or”) of two parts, $$\sim q$$ and $$r$$. Remember the truth table for a disjunction. A statement of the form $$X \vee Y$$ is False only when both $$X$$ and $$Y$$ are False:
$$X \vee Y = F \quad\text{iff}\quad X = F \text{ and } Y = F.$$
Applying this rule to $$(\sim q \vee r)$$, the overall disjunction is False, so both pieces must be False:
$$\sim q = F \quad\text{and}\quad r = F.$$
Now we can extract the truth values of $$q$$ and $$r$$ one by one.
Since $$\sim q = F,$$ the negation of $$q$$ is False. A negation is False precisely when the original statement is True. Therefore,
$$q = T.$$
We have already obtained from the disjunction that
$$r = F.$$
Collecting our results, the ordered triple of truth values is
$$\bigl(p,\, q,\, r\bigr) = (T,\, T,\, F).$$
Looking at the options, this matches Option C (labelled “3”).
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The contrapositive of the statement "If you are born in India, then you are a citizen of India", is:
We begin by identifying the logical form of the given English statement. The sentence “If you are born in India, then you are a citizen of India” can be written symbolically as $$P \rightarrow Q,$$ where
$$P: \text{You are born in India},$$
$$Q: \text{You are a citizen of India}.$$
Now we recall the definition of a contrapositive. The logical rule states that for any conditional statement $$P \rightarrow Q,$$ the contrapositive is obtained by first negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion, and then reversing their order. In symbols,
$$\text{Contrapositive of } (P \rightarrow Q) \text{ is } (\lnot Q) \rightarrow (\lnot P).$$
So we apply this rule step by step. First, we negate the conclusion $$Q$$:
$$\lnot Q: \text{You are \emph{not} a citizen of India}.$$
Next, we negate the hypothesis $$P$$:
$$\lnot P: \text{You are \emph{not} born in India}.$$
Finally, we place the negated conclusion as the new hypothesis and the negated hypothesis as the new conclusion, giving
$$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P,$$
which translates back into English as “If you are not a citizen of India, then you are not born in India.”
We now compare this derived contrapositive with the options provided:
A. If you are not born in India, then you are not a citizen of India. (Matches $$\lnot P \rightarrow \lnot Q$$, which is the converse of the inverse, not the contrapositive.)
B. If you are a citizen of India, then you are born in India. (This is the converse of the original statement.)
C. If you are born in India, then you are not a citizen of India. (This directly contradicts the original statement.)
D. If you are not a citizen of India, then you are not born in India. (Exactly matches $$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P,$$ the contrapositive.)
We see that option D expresses the correct contrapositive.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
The expression $$\sim(\sim p \to q)$$ is logically equivalent to
We begin with the expression $$\sim(\sim p \to q)$$ and shall simplify it carefully, showing every algebraic detail.
First, we recall the implication law:
$$x \to y \;\equiv\; \sim x \;\vee\; y.$$
Here the part playing the role of $$x$$ is $$\sim p$$ and the part playing the role of $$y$$ is $$q$$. Substituting these symbols into the implication law we obtain
$$\bigl(\,\sim p \to q\,\bigr) \;\equiv\; \sim(\,\sim p\,)\;\vee\;q.$$
Now, inside the negation we have a double negation $$\sim(\,\sim p\,)$$, and the rule of double negation states that $$\sim(\,\sim p\,)\equiv p$$. Hence we get
$$\bigl(\,\sim p \to q\,\bigr) \;\equiv\; p \;\vee\; q.$$
Returning to the original expression, we must negate this result. So we write
$$\sim(\,\sim p \to q\,) \;\equiv\; \sim\bigl(p \;\vee\; q\bigr).$$
Next, we invoke De Morgan’s law, which tells us that the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations:
$$\sim\bigl(p \;\vee\; q\bigr) \;\equiv\; \bigl(\sim p\bigr) \;\wedge\; \bigl(\sim q\bigr).$$
Thus, after carrying out all transformations, the original expression simplifies completely to
$$\sim p \;\wedge\; \sim q.$$
Looking at the options, this matches Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Which one of the following Boolean expression is a tautology?
First, remember that a Boolean expression is called a tautology if it is always true, no matter whether the simple propositions $$p$$ and $$q$$ are true (T) or false (F). To decide which option is a tautology, we shall simplify every given expression algebraically, employing these standard Boolean laws:
$$\begin{aligned} &\text{(1) Distributive law:}&\; a\wedge(b\vee c)= (a\wedge b)\vee(a\wedge c),\\ &\text{(2) Distributive law:}&\; a\vee(b\wedge c)= (a\vee b)\wedge(a\vee c),\\ &\text{(3) Complement law:}&\; a\vee\neg a = \text{T},\; a\wedge\neg a = \text{F},\\ &\text{(4) Identity law:}&\; a\vee\text{F}=a,\; a\wedge\text{T}=a,\\ &\text{(5) Domination law:}&\; a\vee\text{T}=\text{T},\; a\wedge\text{F}= \text{F}. \end{aligned}$$
Now we analyse each option one by one.
Option A: $$ (p \vee q)\wedge (\neg p \vee \neg q) $$
We notice that $$\neg p\vee\neg q$$ is the negation of $$p\wedge q$$ by De Morgan’s law, so we may write
$$ (p\vee q)\wedge\neg(p\wedge q). $$
This is exactly the exclusive-or (“one but not both”) condition. For example, if both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are true, then $$p\wedge q$$ is true, its negation is false, and the whole expression becomes false. Hence Option A is not always true, so it is not a tautology.
Option B: $$ (p\wedge q)\vee(p\wedge\neg q) $$
We factor out the common literal $$p$$ using the distributive law (1):
$$ (p\wedge q)\vee(p\wedge\neg q)= p\wedge (q\vee\neg q). $$
By the complement law (3), $$q\vee\neg q=\text{T}$$, so
$$ p\wedge \text{T}=p. $$
Since $$p$$ can be true or false, the whole expression can also be true or false; therefore it is not a tautology.
Option C: $$ (p\vee q)\wedge(p\vee\neg q) $$
Here we use the distributive law (2) in reverse, pulling out the common literal $$p\vee$$:
$$ (p\vee q)\wedge(p\vee\neg q)= p\vee(q\wedge\neg q). $$
Again by the complement law (3), $$q\wedge\neg q=\text{F}$$, so we get
$$ p\vee \text{F}=p. $$
This reduces to the single variable $$p$$, which is not always true, so Option C is also not a tautology.
Option D: $$ (p \vee q)\vee(\neg p \vee \neg q) $$
Using associativity and commutativity of $$\vee$$, we simply collect all the literals:
$$ (p\vee q)\vee(\neg p\vee \neg q)= p\vee\neg p\vee q\vee\neg q. $$
Now group the complementary pairs:
$$ p\vee\neg p = \text{T}, \quad q\vee\neg q = \text{T}. $$
So the entire expression becomes
$$ \text{T}\vee\text{T}=\text{T}, $$
which is true for every possible truth‐value combination of $$p$$ and $$q$$. Therefore Option D is a tautology.
After examining all four choices, we see that only Option 4 (that is, Option D) is always true.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 4.
Which one of the following statements is not a tautology?
First, recall the definition: a statement (propositional formula) is called a tautology if it evaluates to $$\text{True}$$ for every possible assignment of truth-values to its constituent propositions.
Let us examine each option by constructing its complete truth table. Because we have two simple propositions, $$p$$ and $$q$$, there are exactly four possible ordered pairs $$(p,q)$$, namely $$(T,T),\;(T,F),\;(F,T),\;(F,F).$$ We shall evaluate each compound statement row by row.
Option A is $$\;(p \lor q)\;\rightarrow\;(p \lor \sim q).$$ We compute step by step.
We have
$$\begin{array}{|c|c||c|c||c|} \hline p & q & p\lor q & \sim q & p\lor\sim q \\ \hline T & T & T & F & T \\ \hline T & F & T & T & T \\ \hline F & T & T & F & F \\ \hline F & F & F & T & T \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Now, the implication $$A\rightarrow B$$ is false only when $$A$$ is $$T$$ and $$B$$ is $$F$$. Introducing one extra column for the entire statement, we get
$$\begin{array}{|c|c||c|c|c||c|} \hline p & q & p\lor q & \sim q & p\lor\sim q & (p\lor q)\rightarrow(p\lor\sim q) \\ \hline T & T & T & F & T & T \\ \hline T & F & T & T & T & T \\ \hline F & T & T & F & F & F \\ \hline F & F & F & T & T & T \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Because the third row yields the value $$F$$, the statement is not always true; therefore Option A is not a tautology.
Option B is $$\;(p \land q)\;\rightarrow\;(\sim p \lor q).$$ We proceed similarly:
$$\begin{array}{|c|c||c|c||c|} \hline p & q & p\land q & \sim p & \sim p\lor q \\ \hline T & T & T & F & T \\ \hline T & F & F & F & F \\ \hline F & T & F & T & T \\ \hline F & F & F & T & T \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Adding the implication column,
$$\begin{array}{|c|c||c|c|c||c|} \hline p & q & p\land q & \sim p & \sim p\lor q & (p\land q)\rightarrow(\sim p\lor q) \\ \hline T & T & T & F & T & T \\ \hline T & F & F & F & F & T \\ \hline F & T & F & T & T & T \\ \hline F & F & F & T & T & T \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Every row is $$T$$, so Option B is a tautology.
Option C is $$\;p\;\rightarrow\;(p \lor q).$$ Observe that whenever $$p$$ is $$T$$, the consequent $$p \lor q$$ is automatically $$T$$ (since a disjunction is true if any component is true). Whenever $$p$$ is $$F$$, the implication is vacuously true. Hence every row is $$T$$, confirming that Option C is a tautology.
Option D is $$\;(p \land q)\;\rightarrow\;p.$$ The antecedent can be $$T$$ only when both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are $$T$$, in which case $$p$$ is certainly $$T$$, making the implication true. In all other rows the antecedent is $$F$$, so the implication is again vacuously true. Thus Option D is also a tautology.
Summarising, only Option A fails to remain true under every valuation. It is therefore the single statement that is not a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
If $$p \Rightarrow (q \lor r)$$ is False, then the truth values of p, q, r are respectively, (where T is True and F is False)
First, recall the logical rule for an implication. The statement $$p \Rightarrow s$$ is false only in one specific situation: when the antecedent $$p$$ is True (T) and the consequent $$s$$ is False (F). In every other combination the implication is True. Symbolically, we can rewrite an implication with the formula $$p \Rightarrow s \;=\; \lnot p \,\lor\, s,$$ which confirms the same fact because a disjunction $$\lnot p \lor s$$ fails exactly when $$\lnot p$$ is F (so $$p$$ is T) and simultaneously $$s$$ is F.
Now we apply this rule to the given compound statement $$p \Rightarrow (q \lor r).$$ Here the consequent is the disjunction $$(q \lor r).$$ We are told that the whole implication is False. Therefore, by the rule just stated, the following two conditions must hold together:
1. $$p$$ is True, because the antecedent must be True for the implication to fail.
2. $$(q \lor r)$$ is False, because the consequent must be False for the implication to fail.
Next, we analyse the disjunction $$(q \lor r).$$ A disjunction $$q \lor r$$ is True if at least one of $$q$$ or $$r$$ is True, and it is False only when both $$q$$ and $$r$$ are False. So, for $$(q \lor r)$$ to be False, we must have
$$q = \text{F} \quad \text{and} \quad r = \text{F}.$$
We already found $$p = \text{T}.$$ Putting these results together, the required truth values are
$$p = \text{T}, \qquad q = \text{F}, \qquad r = \text{F}.$$
Looking at the options, this matches Option A, which lists T, F, F in that order.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The negation of the Boolean expression $$\sim s \vee (\sim r \wedge s)$$ is equivalent to
We begin with the Boolean expression whose negation we must find:
$$\sim s \;\vee\; (\sim r \;\wedge\; s).$$
Our objective is to compute its logical negation, that is, to evaluate
$$\sim\bigl(\,\sim s \;\vee\; (\sim r \;\wedge\; s)\bigr).$$
First, we invoke De Morgan’s law for the negation of a disjunction, which states:
$$\sim(A \;\vee\; B) \;=\; (\sim A) \;\wedge\; (\sim B).$$
Here, we identify $$A = \sim s$$ and $$B = (\sim r \;\wedge\; s).$$ Applying the law gives
$$\sim(\,\sim s \;\vee\; (\sim r \;\wedge\; s)) \;=\; \bigl(\sim(\sim s)\bigr) \;\wedge\; \bigl(\sim(\sim r \;\wedge\; s)\bigr).$$
Now, $$\sim(\sim s)$$ is simply $$s,$$ because a double negation cancels itself. Substituting, we have
$$s \;\wedge\; \bigl(\sim(\sim r \;\wedge\; s)\bigr).$$
Next, we must simplify $$\sim(\sim r \;\wedge\; s).$$ We again use De Morgan’s law, this time for the negation of a conjunction:
$$\sim(C \;\wedge\; D) \;=\; (\sim C) \;\vee\; (\sim D).$$
Here, $$C = \sim r$$ and $$D = s.$$ Therefore,
$$\sim(\sim r \;\wedge\; s) \;=\; \bigl(\sim(\sim r)\bigr) \;\vee\; (\sim s).$$
The term $$\sim(\sim r)$$ simplifies to $$r.$$ Hence,
$$\sim(\sim r \;\wedge\; s) \;=\; r \;\vee\; (\sim s).$$
Substituting this back, the overall negation becomes
$$s \;\wedge\; \bigl(r \;\vee\; (\sim s)\bigr).$$
We now distribute $$s$$ over the disjunction $$r \;\vee\; (\sim s).$$ The distributive law of Boolean algebra tells us
$$X \;\wedge\; (Y \;\vee\; Z) \;=\; (X \;\wedge\; Y) \;\vee\; (X \;\wedge\; Z).$$
Taking $$X = s, \; Y = r, \; Z = \sim s,$$ we obtain
$$\bigl(s \;\wedge\; r\bigr) \;\vee\; \bigl(s \;\wedge\; (\sim s)\bigr).$$
The term $$s \;\wedge\; (\sim s)$$ is always false (it equals $$0$$) because a proposition cannot be simultaneously true and false. Hence that term vanishes, leaving
$$s \;\wedge\; r.$$
We have therefore shown that the negation of the original expression simplifies to $$s \wedge r,$$ which is exactly Option 2.
Hence, the correct answer is Option 2.
If q is false and $$p \wedge q \leftrightarrow r$$ is true, then which one of the following statements is a tautology?
We are told that the statement $$q$$ is false and at the same time the biconditional $$(p \wedge q) \leftrightarrow r$$ is true. Let us first interpret this information.
By definition, the conjunction $$p \wedge q$$ is true only when both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are true. Because we already know that $$q$$ is false, the value of the entire conjunction is immediately fixed:
$$p \wedge q = \text{False}.$$
Next, we look at the biconditional. Remember the rule for a biconditional:
For any two statements $$A$$ and $$B$$, the statement $$A \leftrightarrow B$$ is true precisely when either
(i) both $$A$$ and $$B$$ are true, or
(ii) both $$A$$ and $$B$$ are false.
In our problem $$A = (p \wedge q)$$ and $$B = r$$. We have discovered that $$A$$ is false. For the biconditional $$A \leftrightarrow B$$ to be true, case (ii) must hold; therefore $$B$$ must also be false. Concretely,
$$r = \text{False}.$$
At this point we have
$$q = \text{False}, \quad r = \text{False}, \quad p$$ is still free (it can be True or False).
We now inspect each option to see which statement is necessarily true—i.e. a tautology—under these fixed truth values.
Option A: $$(p \vee r) \to (p \wedge r).$$
Because $$r = \text{False},$$ we simplify step by step:
$$p \vee r = p \vee \text{False} = p,$$
$$p \wedge r = p \wedge \text{False} = \text{False}.$$
Thus Option A becomes $$p \to \text{False}.$$ The truth rule for implication says $$A \to B$$ is false exactly when $$A$$ is true and $$B$$ is false. Here, whenever $$p$$ is true the implication is false. Hence Option A is not always true.
Option B: $$(p \wedge r) \to (p \vee r).$$
Again using $$r = \text{False}$$ we get
$$p \wedge r = p \wedge \text{False} = \text{False},$$
$$p \vee r = p \vee \text{False} = p.$$
The whole statement reduces to $$\text{False} \to p.$$ An implication whose antecedent is false is always true, irrespective of the consequent. Therefore Option B is always true for both possibilities of $$p$$ and is thus a tautology.
Option C: $$p \wedge r = p \wedge \text{False} = \text{False}.$$ This is always false, so it certainly is not a tautology.
Option D: $$p \vee r = p \vee \text{False} = p.$$ The truth of this statement depends on whether $$p$$ itself is true or false, so it is not guaranteed to be true in all cases.
Only Option B satisfies the requirement of being always true under the given conditions.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The Boolean expression $$((p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee \sim q)) \wedge (\sim p \wedge \sim q)$$ is equivalent to
We have to simplify the Boolean expression $$\bigl((p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee \sim q)\bigr) \wedge (\sim p \wedge \sim q).$$ Throughout, we shall use the well-known Boolean identities: (i) Absorption Law $$X \vee (X \wedge Y)=X,$$ (ii) Distributive Law $$A \wedge (B \vee C)= (A \wedge B)\; \vee\; (A \wedge C),$$ (iii) Idempotent Law $$Z \wedge Z=Z,$$ and (iv) the fact that any statement conjoined with its negation is false, $$R \wedge (\sim R)=0.$$
First concentrate on the part $$ (p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee \sim q).$$ In order to apply the absorption law, we re-express $$(p \wedge q)$$ in a form that visibly contains $$(p \vee \sim q).$$ Observe that
$$ (p \vee \sim q)\;\wedge\; q \;=\; (p \wedge q)\; \vee\; (\sim q \wedge q).$$
Because $$\sim q \wedge q = 0,$$ the right-hand side reduces to $$p \wedge q.$$ Thus we have shown
$$p \wedge q \;=\; (p \vee \sim q)\;\wedge\; q.$$
Letting $$X = (p \vee \sim q) \quad\text{and}\quad Y = q,$$ we may rewrite the first bracket as $$ (X \wedge Y) \vee X.$$ Now, by the absorption law, $$ (X \wedge Y) \vee X = X.$$ Therefore
$$ (p \wedge q) \vee (p \vee \sim q) = p \vee \sim q.$$
Substituting this back, the whole expression becomes
$$ (p \vee \sim q)\; \wedge\; (\sim p \wedge \sim q).$$
Using associativity and commutativity of $$\wedge,$$ we group as
$$ (\sim p \wedge \sim q)\; \wedge\; (p \vee \sim q).$$
Now apply the distributive law with $$A = (\sim p \wedge \sim q),\; B = p,\; C = \sim q:$$
$$ (\sim p \wedge \sim q \wedge p)\; \vee\; (\sim p \wedge \sim q \wedge \sim q).$$
Simplify each part step by step. In the first term, $$\sim p \wedge p = 0,$$ so
$$\sim p \wedge \sim q \wedge p = 0 \wedge \sim q = 0.$$
In the second term, the idempotent law gives $$\sim q \wedge \sim q = \sim q,$$ therefore
$$\sim p \wedge \sim q \wedge \sim q = \sim p \wedge \sim q.$$
Hence the entire expression reduces to
$$ 0 \;\vee\; (\sim p \wedge \sim q) = \sim p \wedge \sim q.$$
Thus the simplified (and therefore equivalent) Boolean expression is $$ (\sim p) \wedge (\sim q).$$ This matches Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The Boolean expression $$\sim(p \Rightarrow (\sim q))$$ is equivalent to
We have to simplify the Boolean expression $$\sim\!\bigl(p \Rightarrow (\sim q)\bigr)$$ and write the result in one of the listed equivalent forms.
First, we recall the logical equivalence that defines an implication. The implication $$a \Rightarrow b$$ is always equivalent to the disjunction $$(\sim a)\,\vee\, b.$$ We will apply this fact to the inner implication $$p \Rightarrow (\sim q).$$
So we write
$$p \Rightarrow (\sim q) \;=\; (\sim p)\,\vee\,(\sim q).$$
Substituting this back into the original expression gives
$$\sim\!\bigl(p \Rightarrow (\sim q)\bigr) \;=\; \sim\!\bigl((\sim p)\,\vee\,(\sim q)\bigr).$$
Now we must remove the outer negation. For this we make use of De Morgan’s Law, which states:
$$\sim(A \vee B) = (\sim A) \wedge (\sim B), \quad \sim(A \wedge B) = (\sim A) \vee (\sim B).$$
In our case $$A = (\sim p)\quad\text{and}\quad B = (\sim q).$$ Hence
$$\sim\!\bigl((\sim p)\,\vee\,(\sim q)\bigr) = (\sim(\sim p)) \,\wedge\, (\sim(\sim q)).$$
Double negations cancel out, because $$\sim(\sim r)=r$$ for any statement $$r$$. Therefore
$$ (\sim(\sim p)) \,\wedge\, (\sim(\sim q)) = p \,\wedge\, q.$$
Thus we have shown step by step that
$$\sim\!\bigl(p \Rightarrow (\sim q)\bigr) = p \wedge q.$$
The equivalent option in the list is Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
If the function $$f: R - \{1, -1\} \rightarrow A$$ defined by $$f(x) = \frac{x^2}{1 - x^2}$$, is surjective, then $$A$$ is equal to:
We are given the function $$f : \mathbb R-\{1,-1\}\to A$$ defined by
$$f(x)=\dfrac{x^{2}}{1-x^{2}}.$$
Our task is to find the set $$A$$ that makes the mapping surjective, that is, every element of $$A$$ must actually be attained as a value of $$f(x)$$ for some admissible $$x$$. So we need the precise range (image) of $$f$$.
First we notice that only the square of $$x$$ appears in the numerator, so it is convenient to set
$$t = x^{2}.$$
This substitution immediately gives two useful facts:
1. Because $$x^{2}\ge 0$$ for all real $$x$$, we have $$t\ge 0.$$
2. The domain restriction $$x\neq \pm1$$ translates to $$t\neq 1.$$ (Indeed, $$x=1$$ or $$x=-1$$ would give $$t=1$$.)
With this change of variable we can rewrite the function as
$$f(x)=\dfrac{t}{1-t},\qquad \text{where}\; t\ge 0,\; t\neq 1.$$
So the problem reduces to finding all real values $$y$$ for which the equation
$$y=\dfrac{t}{1-t}$$
has a solution $$t\ge 0,\,t\neq1.$$ We now study this rational expression carefully.
Case 1: $$0\le t<1$$.
Here the denominator $$1-t$$ is positive, and the numerator $$t$$ is non-negative. Hence
$$y=\dfrac{t}{1-t}\ge 0.$$
We analyse the end-points:
• As $$t\to0^{+}$$ we get $$y\to0.$$
• As $$t\to1^{-}$$ we have $$1-t\to0^{+}$$, so the fraction grows without bound and $$y\to +\infty.$$
Because the function $$t\mapsto\dfrac{t}{1-t}$$ is continuous on $$[0,1)$$, every non-negative real number is attained exactly once. Thus this case contributes the entire interval
$$[0,\infty).$$
Case 2: $$t>1$$.
Now the denominator $$1-t$$ is negative while the numerator $$t$$ is positive. Therefore
$$y=\dfrac{t}{1-t}<0.$$ (A positive number divided by a negative number is negative.)
Again we check limits:
• As $$t\to1^{+}$$ we have $$1-t\to0^{-}$$, so the quotient tends to $$-\infty$$.
• As $$t\to\infty$$ we use the highest-degree terms to estimate $$\dfrac{t}{1-t}=\dfrac{t}{-t\bigl(1-\tfrac1t\bigr)}\approx\dfrac{t}{-t}=-1.$$
To see exactly how it approaches $$-1$$, rearrange the expression algebraically:
$$y=\dfrac{t}{1-t}=-\,\dfrac{t}{t-1}.$$
Since $$\dfrac{t}{t-1}>1$$ for all $$t>1$$, we conclude
$$y<-1.$$
Moreover, the map $$t\mapsto -\dfrac{t}{t-1}$$ is continuous and strictly increasing on $$(1,\infty)$$, so it takes every value from $$-\infty$$ up to (but not including) $$-1$$. Hence this case contributes the interval
$$(-\infty,-1).$$
Combining both cases, we obtain
$$\text{Range}(f)=(-\infty,-1)\,\cup\,[0,\infty).$$
Equivalently, this is the set of all real numbers except those belonging to the open interval $$(-1,0)$$, and we must exclude the single point $$-1$$ itself because it never occurs. Therefore the range can be written succinctly as
$$\mathbb R-\bigl[-1,0\bigr).$$
Among the given options, this set appears exactly as Option C.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let Z be the set of integers. If $$A = \{x \in Z : 2^{(x+2)(x^2-5x+6)} = 1\}$$ and $$B = \{x \in Z : -3 < 2x - 1 < 9\}$$, then the number of subsets of the set $$A \times B$$, is:
We have the set $$A=\{x\in \mathbb Z:2^{(x+2)\bigl(x^{2}-5x+6\bigr)}=1\}.$$
First, recall the basic fact: for any real number $$k,$$ the equality $$2^{k}=1$$ holds only when $$k=0,$$ because the base $$2$$ is positive and not equal to $$1.$$ Hence, to find all integers $$x$$ belonging to $$A,$$ we must force the exponent to be zero:
$$ (x+2)\bigl(x^{2}-5x+6\bigr)=0. $$
This product equals zero precisely when at least one factor is zero. We split it:
1. $$x+2=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; x=-2.$$
2. $$x^{2}-5x+6=0.$$
We factor the quadratic:
$$ x^{2}-5x+6=(x-2)(x-3). $$
So
$$ (x-2)(x-3)=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; x=2 \text{ or } x=3. $$
Collecting all integer solutions, we obtain
$$ A=\{-2,\,2,\,3\}, $$
which contains $$|A|=3$$ elements.
Now consider the set $$B=\{x\in\mathbb Z:-3<2x-1<9\}.$$ We solve the double inequality step by step.
First, add $$1$$ to every part:
$$ -3+1 < 2x-1+1 < 9+1 \;\Longrightarrow\; -2 < 2x < 10. $$
Next, divide every part by $$2$$ (the sign of $$2$$ is positive, so the inequalities keep their direction):
$$ \frac{-2}{2} < x < \frac{10}{2} \;\Longrightarrow\; -1 < x < 5. $$
The integers strictly between $$-1$$ and $$5$$ are
$$ 0,\;1,\;2,\;3,\;4. $$
Thus
$$ B=\{0,\,1,\,2,\,3,\,4\}, $$
with $$|B|=5$$ elements.
We now form the Cartesian product $$A\times B=\{(a,b):a\in A,\;b\in B\}.$$ The counting principle tells us that
$$ |A\times B|=|A|\times|B|=3\times5=15. $$
Finally, the total number of subsets of any finite set containing $$n$$ elements is given by the formula $$2^{n}.$$ Substituting $$n=15,$$ we get
$$ \text{Number of subsets}=2^{15}. $$
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
For $$x \in R$$, Let [x] denotes the greatest integer $$\leq x$$, then the sum of the series $$\left[-\frac{1}{3}\right] + \left[-\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{100}\right] + \left[-\frac{1}{3} - \frac{2}{100}\right] + \ldots + \left[-\frac{1}{3} - \frac{99}{100}\right]$$ is
We begin by recalling the definition of the greatest-integer (floor) function. By definition, for any real number $$x$$
$$[x]=n \quad\text{if and only if}\quad n\le x<n+1,$$
where $$n$$ is an integer. In words, $$[x]$$ is the largest integer that is not greater than $$x$$.
The series to be summed is
$$\left[-\frac13\right]+\left[-\frac13-\frac1{100}\right]+\left[-\frac13-\frac2{100}\right]+\ldots+\left[-\frac13-\frac{99}{100}\right].$$
To handle all the terms uniformly, let us label the general (k-th) term:
$$T_k=\left[-\frac13-\frac{k}{100}\right], \qquad k=0,1,2,\ldots ,99.$$
Our task is to find $$T_k$$ for every integer $$k$$ in the stated range and then add all the $$T_k$$.
First, convert $$\displaystyle -\frac13$$ into its decimal form for easy comparison:
$$-\frac13=-0.333333\ldots$$
Next, observe that
$$-\frac13-\frac{k}{100}=-0.333333\ldots-\frac{k}{100}.$$
Because $$\dfrac{k}{100}$$ varies from $$0$$ (when $$k=0$$) to $$\dfrac{99}{100}=0.99$$ (when $$k=99$$), the expression
$$\alpha_k=-\frac13-\frac{k}{100}$$
will move from
$$\alpha_0=-0.333333\ldots$$
down to
$$\alpha_{99}=-0.333333\ldots-0.99=-1.323333\ldots$$
Thus each $$\alpha_k$$ lies in the interval
$$-1.323333\ldots\le\alpha_k\le-0.333333\ldots$$
Within this interval the only integers that can serve as greatest integers are $$-1$$ and $$-2$$, because
$$-2<-1.323333\ldots\le\alpha_k\le-0.333333\ldots<0.$$
So every term $$T_k$$ equals either $$-1$$ or $$-2$$. To decide which, locate the point where $$\alpha_k$$ crosses $$-1$$. We need
$$\alpha_k<-1\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad -\frac13-\frac{k}{100}<-1.$$
Rearranging, add $$\dfrac13$$ to both sides:
$$-\frac{k}{100}<-1+\frac13=-\frac23.$$
Multiplying by $$-1$$ reverses the inequality:
$$\frac{k}{100}>\frac23.$$
Now convert $$\dfrac23$$ to a decimal:
$$\frac23=0.666666\ldots$$
Hence
$$\frac{k}{100}>0.666666\ldots\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad k>66.6666\ldots$$
Since $$k$$ is an integer, the inequality becomes
$$k\ge 67.$$
We have therefore obtained two cases.
• If $$0\le k\le 66$$, then $$\alpha_k\ge-1$$, so
$$T_k=[\alpha_k]=-1.$$
• If $$67\le k\le 99$$, then $$\alpha_k<-1$$, but always $$\alpha_k>-2$$, so
$$T_k=[\alpha_k]=-2.$$
Count how many times each value occurs.
• For $$k=0,1,2,\ldots,66$$ we have $$67$$ integers, giving $$67$$ occurrences of $$-1$$.
• For $$k=67,68,\ldots,99$$ we have $$99-67+1=33$$ integers, giving $$33$$ occurrences of $$-2$$.
Now add all the terms:
$$\text{Sum}=67(-1)+33(-2).$$
Simplify step by step:
$$67(-1)=-67,$$
$$33(-2)=-66,$$
and finally
$$-67-66=-133.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let A, B and C be sets such that $$\phi \neq A \cap B \subseteq C$$. Then which of the following statements is not true?
We are told that the three sets A, B and C satisfy the double condition $$\phi \neq A \cap B \subseteq C.$$ This means two things at once:
1. $$A \cap B \neq \phi,$$ so at least one element lies in both A and B.
2. Every element that is in $$A \cap B$$ is also in C, that is $$A \cap B \subseteq C.$$
With these facts in hand we now examine each of the four given statements and check whether it must always be true. The statement that fails will be the one that is not true.
Option A. We want to know whether $$B \cap C \neq \phi.$$
Because $$A \cap B \neq \phi,$$ choose an element $$x$$ such that $$x \in A \cap B.$$ From $$x \in A \cap B \subseteq C$$ we immediately obtain $$x \in C.$$ Therefore $$x \in B$$ and $$x \in C$$ at the same time, whence $$x \in B \cap C.$$ Thus $$B \cap C$$ definitely contains at least one element, so $$B \cap C \neq \phi.$$ Option A is always true.
Option B. The expression is $$(C \cup A)\, \cap\, (C \cup B).$$ First recall the standard distributive law of sets:
$$ (X \cup Y) \cap (X \cup Z) \;=\; X \cup (Y \cap Z). $$
Take $$X = C,\; Y = A,\; Z = B.$$ Applying the formula gives
$$ (C \cup A) \cap (C \cup B) \;=\; C \cup (A \cap B). $$
We already know that $$A \cap B \subseteq C,$$ so the union of C with a subset of C is just C itself:
$$ C \cup (A \cap B) = C. $$
Hence the equality in Option B holds for every such triple of sets, so Option B is true.
Option C. We are asked to test the implication
$$ (A - B) \subseteq C \;\Longrightarrow\; A \subseteq C. $$
First write A as the disjoint union of two parts:
$$ A = (A - B)\; \cup\; (A \cap B). $$
If we are given that $$A - B \subseteq C$$ and we already know $$A \cap B \subseteq C,$$ then every element of the left-hand set and every element of the right-hand set lies in C, so their union A also lies in C. Therefore $$A \subseteq C,$$ and Option C is always true.
Option D. Now consider the implication
$$ (A - C) \subseteq B \;\Longrightarrow\; A \subseteq B. $$
Again decompose A, this time relative to C:
$$ A = (A - C)\; \cup\; (A \cap C). $$
The assumption in the hypothesis tells us only that $$A - C \subseteq B.$$ Nothing in the premise gives any information about $$A \cap C,$$ so those elements could fail to belong to B. Hence A may or may not be contained in B; the implication is not guaranteed.
To make this completely concrete, define
$$A = \{1,2\},\quad B = \{1\},\quad C = \{1,2\}.$$
Then
• $$A \cap B = \{1\} \neq \phi,$$ and clearly $$\{1\} \subseteq C,$$ so the initial condition is satisfied.
• Because every element of A is already in C, we have $$A - C = \phi,$$ and the empty set is always a subset of every set, so $$A - C \subseteq B$$ is true.
• However, $$A = \{1,2\}$$ is not a subset of $$B = \{1\},$$ since 2 does not lie in B.
This counter-example shows that the implication in Option D can fail, so Option D is not always true.
Among the four statements the only one that does not hold in every case is Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let a function $$f : (0, \infty) \to (0, \infty)$$ be defined by $$f(x) = \left|1 - \frac{1}{x}\right|$$. Then f is:
First remember the definition of a function: every element of the domain must be assigned an image that actually lies inside the codomain. The codomain fixed by the question is $$(0,\infty),$$ i.e. the set of strictly positive real numbers.
Now we examine the value of the given rule at the point $$x=1.$$ Substituting in the formula
$$f(x)=\left|1-\frac1x\right|,$$
we obtain
$$f(1)=\left|1-\frac11\right|=\left|1-1\right|=\left|0\right|=0.$$
But $$0\notin(0,\infty).$$ Therefore the image of the point $$x=1$$ does not belong to the declared codomain. This violates the very definition of a function from $$(0,\infty)$$ to $$(0,\infty).$$
Because the mapping is not even well-defined with the announced codomain, questions about injectivity or surjectivity are meaningless: the object under discussion fails to be a bona-fide function in the first place. Consequently none of the descriptions “injective only”, “not injective but surjective”, or “neither injective nor surjective” can be accepted.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$f(x) = x^2$$, $$x \in R$$. For any $$A \subseteq R$$, define $$g(A) = \{x \in R : f(x) \in A\}$$. If $$S = [0, 4]$$, then which one of the following statements is not true?
We have the function $$f(x)=x^{2}$$ defined for every real number $$x$$.
For any subset $$A\subseteq \mathbb R$$, we are told to define
$$g(A)=\{x\in\mathbb R: f(x)\in A\}.$$
This means $$g(A)$$ is the set of all real numbers whose squares belong to the set $$A$$; in other words, $$g(A)$$ is the pre-image of $$A$$ under the squaring function.
Now let us fix the set $$S=[0,4].$$ We shall compute the four quantities that occur in the options one by one.
First we find $$f(S).$$
Every number in $$S$$ satisfies $$0\le x\le 4$$. Squaring preserves order for non-negative numbers, so
$$0^{2}\le x^{2}\le 4^{2}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad 0\le x^{2}\le16.$$
Hence
$$f(S)=\{x^{2}:x\in[0,4]\}=[0,16].$$
Next we find $$g(S).$$
By definition,
$$g(S)=\{x\in\mathbb R:f(x)\in S\}=\{x\in\mathbb R:x^{2}\in[0,4]\}.$$
The condition $$x^{2}\in[0,4]$$ means
$$0\le x^{2}\le4.$$
Taking square roots gives $$|x|\le2,$$ which is equivalent to
$$-2\le x\le2.$$
Therefore
$$g(S)=[-2,2].$$
Now we compute $$f(g(S)).$$
We already know $$g(S)=[-2,2].$$ Applying $$f(x)=x^{2}$$ to every number in this interval, we obtain
$$f(g(S))=\{x^{2}:x\in[-2,2]\}.$$
The smallest value of $$x^{2}$$ on $$[-2,2]$$ is $$0^{2}=0,$$ and the largest value is $$2^{2}=4.$$ Hence
$$f(g(S))=[0,4].$$
Observe that $$[0,4]=S,$$ so
$$f(g(S))=S.$$
Next we compute $$g(f(S)).$$
We already showed $$f(S)=[0,16].$$ By definition,
$$g(f(S))=\{x\in\mathbb R:x^{2}\in[0,16]\}.$$
The condition $$x^{2}\le16$$ is equivalent to $$|x|\le4,$$ that is
$$-4\le x\le4.$$
Hence
$$g(f(S))=[-4,4].$$
Finally we compare the sets obtained so far.
We have
$$S=[0,4],\qquad f(S)=[0,16],\qquad g(S)=[-2,2],\qquad f(g(S))=[0,4],\qquad g(f(S))=[-4,4].$$
Let us examine each option.
Option A states $$g(f(S))\neq S.$$ Since $$g(f(S))=[-4,4]$$ and $$S=[0,4],$$ the two intervals differ (for example, $$-2\in[-4,4]$$ but $$-2\notin[0,4]$$). Therefore the inequality is correct; Option A is a true statement.
Option B states $$f(g(S))\neq f(S).$$ We found $$f(g(S))=[0,4]$$ whereas $$f(S)=[0,16]$$, so they are indeed unequal. Thus Option B is also true.
Option C asserts $$f(g(S))=S.$$ We have already proved $$f(g(S))=[0,4]=S,$$ so Option C is true.
Option D asserts $$g(f(S))=g(S).$$ But $$g(f(S))=[-4,4]$$ while $$g(S)=[-2,2];$$ these two sets are not equal because, for instance, $$3\in[-4,4]$$ but $$3\notin[-2,2].$$ Hence Option D is false.
Because the question asks for the statement that is not true, we conclude that Option D is the required choice.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$N$$ be the set of natural numbers and two functions $$f$$ and $$g$$ be defined as $$f, g: N \to N$$ such that $$f(n) = \begin{cases} \frac{n+1}{2}, & \text{if n is odd} \\ \frac{n}{2}, & \text{if n is even} \end{cases}$$ and $$g(n) = n - (-1)^n$$. Then $$fog$$ is:
We consider the set of natural numbers $$N=\{1,2,3,\dots\}$$ and the two given functions
$$f:N\to N,\qquad f(n)= \begin{cases} \dfrac{n+1}{2}, & \text{if }n\text{ is odd}\\[6pt] \dfrac{n}{2}, & \text{if }n\text{ is even} \end{cases}$$
and
$$g:N\to N,\qquad g(n)=n-(-1)^n.$$
First we rewrite $$g$$ separately for even and odd inputs. We know the elementary fact $$(-1)^n=\begin{cases}1,& n\text{ even}\\-1,& n\text{ odd.}\end{cases}$$ Using this fact, we have
For even $$n,$$ say $$n=2k,$$
$$g(2k)=2k-1.$$
For odd $$n,$$ say $$n=2k-1,$$
$$g(2k-1)=2k-1-(-1)^{2k-1}=2k-1-(-1)=2k.$$
So
$$g(n)=\begin{cases} n-1,& n \text{ even}\\ n+1,& n \text{ odd}. \end{cases}$$
Now we evaluate the composition $$f\circ g,$$ that is, $$\bigl(f\circ g\bigr)(n)=f\bigl(g(n)\bigr).$$ We again consider the parity of $$n.$$
Case 1 : $$n$$ is even. Write $$n=2k.$$ Then
$$g(n)=g(2k)=2k-1,$$
and this number $$2k-1$$ is odd. When the input to $$f$$ is odd we use the first branch of $$f,$$ hence
$$f\bigl(g(2k)\bigr)=f(2k-1)=\dfrac{(2k-1)+1}{2}=\dfrac{2k}{2}=k.$$
Because $$n=2k,$$ we can rewrite this result as
$$\bigl(f\circ g\bigr)(n)=\dfrac{n}{2},\qquad n\text{ even}.$$
Case 2 : $$n$$ is odd. Write $$n=2k-1.$$ Then
$$g(n)=g(2k-1)=2k,$$
and this output $$2k$$ is even. For an even input, $$f$$ takes its second branch, giving
$$f\bigl(g(2k-1)\bigr)=f(2k)=\dfrac{2k}{2}=k.$$
Because $$n=2k-1,$$ this can be rewritten as
$$\bigl(f\circ g\bigr)(n)=\dfrac{n+1}{2},\qquad n\text{ odd}.$$
Combining the two cases, we obtain the explicit expression
$$\boxed{\bigl(f\circ g\bigr)(n)= \begin{cases} \dfrac{n+1}{2}, & n\text{ odd}\\[6pt] \dfrac{n}{2}, & n\text{ even} \end{cases}}$$
We notice that this is exactly the same rule that defines $$f$$ itself. Hence $$f\circ g=f.$$ To decide between the options we must examine whether this function is one-one (injective) and/or onto (surjective) as a map from $$N$$ to $$N.$$
Injectivity test. We compute two different inputs that yield the same output:
$$f(1)=\dfrac{1+1}{2}=1,\qquad f(2)=\dfrac{2}{2}=1.$$
The values $$1$$ and $$2$$ are distinct, yet $$f(1)=f(2).$$ Therefore $$f$$ is not one-one. Since $$f\circ g=f,$$ the composition is also not one-one.
Surjectivity test. Take any arbitrary natural number $$m\in N.$$ Choosing $$n=2m$$ (which is even) gives
$$f(2m)=\dfrac{2m}{2}=m.$$
Thus every element $$m$$ in the codomain $$N$$ is hit by some element of the domain, so $$f$$ is onto, and therefore $$f\circ g$$ is also onto.
We have proved that $$f\circ g$$ is onto but not one-one.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
For $$x \in R - \{0, 1\}$$, let $$f_1(x) = \frac{1}{x}$$, $$f_2(x) = 1 - x$$ and $$f_3(x) = \frac{1}{1-x}$$ be three given functions. If a function, $$J(x)$$ satisfies $$(f_2 \circ J \circ f_1)(x) = f_3(x)$$ then $$J(x)$$ is equal to:
We have three given functions defined for all real numbers with $$x \neq 0,\,1$$:
$$f_1(x)=\dfrac{1}{x}, \qquad f_2(x)=1-x, \qquad f_3(x)=\dfrac{1}{1-x}.$$
According to the statement, the function $$J(x)$$ must satisfy
$$(f_2 \circ J \circ f_1)(x)=f_3(x).$$
The symbol “$$\circ$$” denotes composition, so
$$(f_2 \circ J \circ f_1)(x)=f_2\bigl(J(f_1(x))\bigr).$$
Substituting the explicit expression of $$f_1(x)$$, we get
$$f_2\!\left(J\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right)\right)=f_3(x).$$
Next, we write down the formulas that will be used:
• For every real number $$z$$ (with the necessary domain restrictions) we have $$f_2(z)=1-z.$$
• By definition, $$f_3(x)=\dfrac{1}{1-x}.$$
Applying the first formula with $$z=J\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right)$$ we obtain
$$1-J\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right)=\dfrac{1}{1-x}.$$
Now we isolate the expression containing $$J$$ by transposing terms:
$$J\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right)=1-\dfrac{1}{1-x}.$$
To remove the complex fraction, we combine the terms on the right-hand side. First, we rewrite the rightmost fraction with a common denominator:
$$1=\dfrac{1-x}{1-x},$$
so
$$1-\dfrac{1}{1-x}=\dfrac{1-x}{1-x}-\dfrac{1}{1-x}=\dfrac{1-x-1}{1-x}=\dfrac{-x}{1-x}.$$
In the numerator we factor out $$-1$$ and simultaneously switch the order in the denominator to keep the overall value unchanged:
$$\dfrac{-x}{1-x}=\dfrac{x}{x-1}.$$
Thus we have obtained
$$J\!\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right)=\dfrac{x}{x-1}.$$
To rewrite the result directly in terms of the input variable of $$J,$$ let us set
$$t=\dfrac{1}{x}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad x=\dfrac{1}{t}.$$
Replacing every occurrence of $$x$$ by $$1/t$$ in the last equation yields
$$J(t)=\dfrac{\dfrac{1}{t}}{\dfrac{1}{t}-1}.$$
We simplify this fraction step by step. The numerator is $$1/t$$. The denominator simplifies as follows:
$$\dfrac{1}{t}-1=\dfrac{1-t}{t}.$$
Hence,
$$J(t)=\frac{\dfrac{1}{t}}{\dfrac{1-t}{t}}.$$
Dividing one fraction by another is equivalent to multiplying by the reciprocal of the denominator, so
$$J(t)=\dfrac{1}{t}\times\dfrac{t}{1-t}=\dfrac{1}{1-t}.$$
But the right-hand side is precisely the definition of $$f_3(t).$$ Therefore, for every allowed value of $$t,$$
$$J(t)=f_3(t).$$
Removing the dummy variable $$t$$ and returning to the standard notation, we conclude
$$J(x)=f_3(x).$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$f : R \to R$$ be defined by $$f(x) = \frac{x}{1+x^2}$$, $$x \in R$$. Then the range of $$f$$ is
We have a real-valued function $$f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$$ defined by
$$f(x)=\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}, \qquad x\in\mathbb R.$$
To determine the range of $$f$$ we need all possible values taken by $$\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}$$ as $$x$$ varies over every real number.
Because the expression is a quotient of differentiable functions and the denominator $$1+x^{2}$$ is never zero, $$f(x)$$ is continuous for every real $$x$$. For a continuous function on the entire real line, extreme values (if any) will occur either at critical points (where the derivative is zero or undefined) or as $$x\to\pm\infty$$.
First we compute the derivative. We state the Quotient Rule: if $$g(x)=\dfrac{u(x)}{v(x)}$$ with both $$u, v$$ differentiable and $$v(x)\neq0$$, then
$$g'(x)=\dfrac{u'(x)v(x)-u(x)v'(x)}{[v(x)]^{2}}.$$
Here $$u(x)=x$$ and $$v(x)=1+x^{2}$$. Their derivatives are $$u'(x)=1$$ and $$v'(x)=2x$$. Substituting into the Quotient Rule we obtain
$$f'(x)=\dfrac{1\cdot(1+x^{2})-x\cdot(2x)}{(1+x^{2})^{2}} =\dfrac{1+x^{2}-2x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}} =\dfrac{1-x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}.$$
A critical point occurs where $$f'(x)=0$$ or $$f'(x)$$ is undefined. The denominator $$\bigl(1+x^{2}\bigr)^{2}$$ is always positive, so the only way $$f'(x)=0$$ is when the numerator $$1-x^{2}=0$$. Solving,
$$1-x^{2}=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^{2}=1 \;\Longrightarrow\; x=\pm1.$$
Thus, the critical points are $$x=1$$ and $$x=-1$$. We now evaluate $$f(x)$$ at these points:
For $$x=1$$:
$$f(1)=\dfrac{1}{1+1^{2}}=\dfrac{1}{2}.$$
For $$x=-1$$:
$$f(-1)=\dfrac{-1}{1+(-1)^{2}}=\dfrac{-1}{2}.$$
Next, we study the behaviour of $$f(x)$$ as $$x$$ tends to infinity or minus infinity. We write
$$\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=\lim_{x\to\infty}\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}} =\lim_{x\to\infty}\dfrac{1/x}{1/x^{2}+1} =\dfrac{0}{0+1}=0.$$
Similarly,
$$\lim_{x\to-\infty}f(x)=0.$$
So the function approaches $$0$$ from both sides but never exceeds (in magnitude) the values found at the critical points. To confirm that $$\dfrac{1}{2}$$ is the greatest and $$-\dfrac{1}{2}$$ is the least value, we examine the sign of the derivative.
Using $$f'(x)=\dfrac{1-x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}$$, notice
- When $$|x|<1$$, the numerator $$1-x^{2}>0$$, so $$f'(x)>0$$ and the function is increasing.
- When $$|x|>1$$, the numerator $$1-x^{2}<0$$, so $$f'(x)<0$$ and the function is decreasing.
Hence $$x=1$$ gives a local maximum value $$\dfrac{1}{2}$$, and $$x=-1$$ gives a local minimum value $$-\dfrac{1}{2}$$. There are no larger or smaller values because the function decreases as we move away from these points and approaches $$0$$ asymptotically.
Therefore the set of all values attained by $$f(x)$$ is the closed interval
$$\left[-\dfrac{1}{2},\,\dfrac{1}{2}\right].$$
So the range is exactly $$\left[-\dfrac{1}{2},\,\dfrac{1}{2}\right]$$, which corresponds to Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$f(x) = a^x$$ ($$a > 0$$) be written as $$f(x) = f_1(x) + f_2(x)$$, where $$f_1(x)$$ is an even function and $$f_2(x)$$ is an odd function. Then $$f_1(x + y) + f_1(x - y)$$ equals:
We start with the given exponential function $$f(x)=a^{\,x}$$ where $$a>0$$.
Every real-valued function can be split uniquely into an even part and an odd part. The standard identities are
$$ f_1(x)=\frac{f(x)+f(-x)}{2}\qquad\text{(even part)},\qquad f_2(x)=\frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{2}\qquad\text{(odd part)}. $$
Substituting $$f(x)=a^{\,x}$$, we obtain
$$ f_1(x)=\frac{a^{\,x}+a^{-x}}{2},\qquad f_2(x)=\frac{a^{\,x}-a^{-x}}{2}. $$
Now we compute $$f_1(x+y)$$:
$$ f_1(x+y)=\frac{a^{\,x+y}+a^{-(x+y)}}{2} =\frac{a^{\,x+y}+a^{-x-y}}{2}. $$
Next, we compute $$f_1(x-y)$$:
$$ f_1(x-y)=\frac{a^{\,x-y}+a^{-(x-y)}}{2} =\frac{a^{\,x-y}+a^{-x+y}}{2}. $$
Adding these two expressions term-by-term gives
$$ f_1(x+y)+f_1(x-y) =\frac{a^{\,x+y}+a^{-x-y}+a^{\,x-y}+a^{-x+y}}{2}. $$
To see the desired pattern, we now form $$2f_1(x)f_1(y)$$. First compute the individual factors:
$$ f_1(x)=\frac{a^{\,x}+a^{-x}}{2},\qquad f_1(y)=\frac{a^{\,y}+a^{-y}}{2}. $$
Multiplying these and then doubling gives
$$ 2f_1(x)f_1(y) =2\left(\frac{a^{\,x}+a^{-x}}{2}\right)\left(\frac{a^{\,y}+a^{-y}}{2}\right) =\frac{(a^{\,x}+a^{-x})(a^{\,y}+a^{-y})}{2}. $$
Expanding the product in the numerator, we have
$$ (a^{\,x}+a^{-x})(a^{\,y}+a^{-y}) =a^{\,x+y}+a^{\,x-y}+a^{-x+y}+a^{-x-y}. $$
Therefore
$$ 2f_1(x)f_1(y) =\frac{a^{\,x+y}+a^{\,x-y}+a^{-x+y}+a^{-x-y}}{2}. $$
Comparing this expression with the earlier result for $$f_1(x+y)+f_1(x-y)$$, we see they are identical:
$$ f_1(x+y)+f_1(x-y)=2f_1(x)f_1(y). $$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The domain of the definition of the function $$f(x) = \frac{1}{4 - x^2} + \log_{10}(x^3 - x)$$ is:
We have to find all real numbers $$x$$ for which the two separate parts of the given expression
$$f(x)=\dfrac{1}{4-x^{2}}+\log_{10}\!\bigl(x^{3}-x\bigr)$$
are simultaneously well-defined.
For the rational term $$\dfrac{1}{4-x^{2}}$$ the denominator must never be zero. We write
$$4-x^{2}\neq 0$$
$$\iff\;-x^{2}\neq -4$$
$$\iff\;x^{2}\neq 4$$
$$\iff\;x\neq \pm 2.$$
There is no further restriction here because a non-zero denominator may be positive or negative; we only exclude the points where it vanishes, namely $$x=-2$$ and $$x=2.$$
For the logarithmic term $$\log_{10}\!\bigl(x^{3}-x\bigr)$$ the argument of the logarithm must be strictly positive. Recalling the basic rule
“A real logarithm $$\log_{a}(y)$$ is defined only when $$y>0,$$”
we impose
$$x^{3}-x>0.$$
We factor the cubic completely:
$$x^{3}-x = x\bigl(x^{2}-1\bigr)$$
$$=x(x-1)(x+1).$$
So we need
$$x(x-1)(x+1)>0.$$
To solve this inequality we examine the sign of the product across the critical points $$x=-1,\;0,\;1.$$ We set up intervals and test each one.
1. Interval $$(-\infty,-1):$$ choose $$x=-2.$$
$$(-2)(-2-1)(-2+1)=(-2)(-3)(-1)=6\cdot(-1)=-6<0.$$
2. Interval $$(-1,0):$$ choose $$x=-\tfrac12.$$
$$\Bigl(-\tfrac12\Bigr)\Bigl(-\tfrac12-1\Bigr)\Bigl(-\tfrac12+1\Bigr) =\Bigl(-\tfrac12\Bigr)\Bigl(-\tfrac32\Bigr)\Bigl(\tfrac12\Bigr) =\tfrac34\cdot\tfrac12=\tfrac38>0.$$
3. Interval $$(0,1):$$ choose $$x=\tfrac12.$$
$$\Bigl(\tfrac12\Bigr)\Bigl(\tfrac12-1\Bigr)\Bigl(\tfrac12+1\Bigr) =\Bigl(\tfrac12\Bigr)\Bigl(-\tfrac12\Bigr)\Bigl(\tfrac32\Bigr) =-\tfrac14\cdot\tfrac32=-\tfrac38<0.$$
4. Interval $$(1,\infty):$$ choose $$x=2.$$
$$(2)(2-1)(2+1)=2\cdot1\cdot3=6>0.$$
The product is therefore positive on
$$(-1,0)\quad\text{and}\quad(1,\infty).$$
Combining both sets of conditions:
- From the logarithm: $$x\in(-1,0)\cup(1,\infty).$$
- From the denominator: $$x\neq -2,\;2.$$ The point $$-2$$ is already outside the first set, but $$2$$ lies inside $$(1,\infty)$$ and must be removed.
Subtracting the single forbidden point $$x=2$$ from $$(1,\infty)$$ splits that interval into two pieces:
$$(1,\infty)\setminus\{2\}=(1,2)\cup(2,\infty).$$
Putting everything together, the set of all admissible $$x$$ is
$$(-1,0)\;\cup\;(1,2)\;\cup\;(2,\infty).$$
This collection exactly matches Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$A = \{x \in R : x$$ is not a positive integer$$\}$$. Define a function $$f: A \to R$$ as $$f(x) = \frac{2x}{x-1}$$, then $$f$$ is:
Let $$S = \{x \in R : x \geq 0$$ & $$2|\sqrt{x} - 3| + \sqrt{x}(\sqrt{x} - 6) + 6 = 0\}$$. Then S:
We begin by observing that the unknown appears inside a square-root, so it is convenient to set $$t=\sqrt{x}\,.$$
Because $$x\ge 0,$$ we automatically have $$t\ge 0.$$ With this substitution the given condition
$$2\lvert\sqrt{x}-3\rvert+\sqrt{x}\,(\sqrt{x}-6)+6=0$$
becomes a purely quadratic-absolute value equation in $$t$$:
$$2\lvert t-3\rvert+t(t-6)+6=0.$$
Simplifying the second term first, we write
$$t(t-6)=t^{2}-6t.$$
Hence the complete equation is
$$2\lvert t-3\rvert+t^{2}-6t+6=0. \quad -(1)$$
The absolute value necessitates splitting into two cases.
Case 1: $$t\ge 3$$. Here $$\lvert t-3\rvert=t-3.$$ Substituting into (1) we get
$$2(t-3)+t^{2}-6t+6=0.$$
Expanding the brackets,
$$2t-6+t^{2}-6t+6=0.$$
Combining like terms,
$$t^{2}-4t=0.$$
Factoring,
$$t(t-4)=0.$$
This quadratic yields two possible roots:
$$t=0\quad\text{or}\quad t=4.$$
However, in the present case we imposed $$t\ge 3,$$ so only $$t=4$$ survives. Translating back,
$$x=t^{2}=4^{2}=16.$$
Case 2: $$0\le t<3$$. Here $$\lvert t-3\rvert=3-t.$$ Substituting into (1) we have
$$2(3-t)+t^{2}-6t+6=0.$$
Expanding,
$$6-2t+t^{2}-6t+6=0.$$
Combining constants and like terms,
$$t^{2}-8t+12=0.$$
To solve the quadratic, we use the standard formula $$t=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}$$ with $$a=1,\;b=-8,\;c=12.$$ This gives
$$t=\dfrac{8\pm\sqrt{64-48}}{2}=\dfrac{8\pm\sqrt{16}}{2}=\dfrac{8\pm4}{2}.$$ So,
$$t=6\quad\text{or}\quad t=2.$$
But the current case demands $$t<3,$$ hence only $$t=2$$ is admissible. Converting back to $$x$$ gives
$$x=t^{2}=2^{2}=4.$$
Combining both cases, the set $$S$$ is
$$S=\{4,\;16\}.$$
This set clearly has exactly two distinct non-negative elements.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Two sets A and B are as under: $$A = \{(a, b) \in R \times R : |a - 5| < 1$$ and $$|b - 5| < 1\}$$; $$B = \{(a, b) \in R \times R : 4(a - 6)^2 + 9(b - 5)^2 \leq 36\}$$. Then:
We have two subsets of the plane $$\mathbb R \times \mathbb R$$ defined as
$$A=\{(a,b):|a-5|<1 \text{ and } |b-5|<1\}$$ and $$B=\{(a,b):4(a-6)^2+9(b-5)^2\le 36\}.$$
First we rewrite the description of each set in a form that is easier to interpret.
For set $$A$$, the inequalities $$|a-5|<1$$ and $$|b-5|<1$$ mean
$$4<a<6 \quad\text{and}\quad 4<b<6.$$
Thus $$A$$ is the open square whose centre is the point $$(5,5)$$ and whose side length is $$2$$.
For set $$B$$ we begin by recalling the standard form of an ellipse. The general formula
$$\frac{(x-h)^2}{p^2}+\frac{(y-k)^2}{q^2}\le 1$$
represents an ellipse centred at $$(h,k)$$ with semi-axes $$p$$ (along the $$x$$-direction) and $$q$$ (along the $$y$$-direction).
We rewrite the defining inequality of $$B$$ in this standard form. Starting from
$$4(a-6)^2+9(b-5)^2\le 36,$$
we divide every term by $$36$$:
$$\frac{4(a-6)^2}{36}+\frac{9(b-5)^2}{36}\le 1.$$
Simplifying the fractions, we obtain
$$\frac{(a-6)^2}{9}+\frac{(b-5)^2}{4}\le 1.$$
Hence $$B$$ is an ellipse with centre $$(6,5),$$ semi-major axis $$3$$ along the $$a$$-direction and semi-minor axis $$2$$ along the $$b$$-direction.
Now we test whether every point of $$A$$ also lies in $$B$$. So let us take an arbitrary point $$(a,b)\in A$$. By membership in $$A$$ we know
$$|a-5|<1 \; \Longrightarrow \; 4<a<6,$$
$$|b-5|<1 \; \Longrightarrow \; 4<b<6.$$
We next estimate the two squared distances that appear in the ellipse inequality.
Because $$4<a<6,$$ we have
$$|a-6|=6-a<6-4=2,$$
so
$$(a-6)^2<2^2=4.$$
Similarly, since $$4<b<6,$$ we get
$$|b-5|<1 \;\Longrightarrow\; (b-5)^2<1.$$
We substitute these upper bounds into the left-hand side of the ellipse condition:
$$\frac{(a-6)^2}{9}+\frac{(b-5)^2}{4}\;<\;\frac{4}{9}+\frac{1}{4}.$$
To compare this sum with $$1,$$ we find a common denominator $$36$$:
$$\frac{4}{9}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{16}{36}+\frac{9}{36}=\frac{25}{36}.$$
Because $$\frac{25}{36}<1,$$ we have
$$\frac{(a-6)^2}{9}+\frac{(b-5)^2}{4}<1.$$
This strict inequality certainly implies the weak inequality
$$\frac{(a-6)^2}{9}+\frac{(b-5)^2}{4}\le 1,$$
which is exactly the condition for $$(a,b)$$ to belong to $$B$$. Therefore every point of $$A$$ lies inside the ellipse $$B$$; symbolically, $$A\subset B.$$
It remains to see that the reverse inclusion does not hold. Consider, for instance, the centre of the ellipse, the point $$P=(6,5).$$ Substituting into the ellipse equation gives
$$4(6-6)^2+9(5-5)^2=0\le 36,$$
so $$P\in B.$$ However, for this point we have $$|a-5|=|6-5|=1,$$ which is not strictly less than $$1,$$ hence $$P\notin A.$$ Thus $$B\not\subset A.$$
Combining these results we conclude
$$A\subset B \quad\text{but}\quad B\not\subset A.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Consider the following two binary relations on the set $$A = \{a, b, c\}$$: $$R_1 = \{(c, a), (b, b), (a, c), (c, c), (b, c), (a, a)\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(a, b), (b, a), (c, c), (c, a), (a, a), (b, b), (a, c)\}$$. Then:
We recall the definitions first. A binary relation $$R$$ on a set $$A$$ is called
$$\text{symmetric} \iff \forall (x,y)\in R,\; (y,x)\in R$$
$$\text{transitive} \iff \forall (x,y)\in R \text{ and } (y,z)\in R,\; (x,z)\in R$$
Now we inspect the two relations given on the set $$A=\{a,b,c\}$$:
$$R_1=\{(c,a),(b,b),(a,c),(c,c),(b,c),(a,a)\}$$ $$R_2=\{(a,b),(b,a),(c,c),(c,a),(a,a),(b,b),(a,c)\}$$
Checking symmetry of $$R_1$$.
• The pair $$(c,a)$$ is present, and its reverse $$(a,c)$$ is in $$R_1$$.
• $$(b,b)$$ is self-symmetric.
• $$(a,c)$$ is present, and its reverse $$(c,a)$$ we already have.
• $$(c,c)$$ is self-symmetric.
• $$(b,c)$$ is present, but its reverse $$(c,b)$$ is not in $$R_1$$.
Because $$(c,b)\notin R_1$$, we conclude that $$R_1$$ is not symmetric.
Checking transitivity of $$R_1$$.
To apply the definition, we look at every ordered pair whose second component matches the first component of another pair and then verify the required third pair.
1. Take $$(c,a)$$ and combine with every pair beginning with $$a$$:
• $$(c,a),(a,c) \;\Rightarrow\; (c,c)$$ and $$(c,c)\in R_1$$ ✔️
• $$(c,a),(a,a) \;\Rightarrow\; (c,a)$$ and $$(c,a)\in R_1$$ ✔️
2. Take $$(b,b)$$ and combine with every pair beginning with $$b$$:
• $$(b,b),(b,b) \;\Rightarrow\; (b,b)$$ present ✔️
• $$(b,b),(b,c) \;\Rightarrow\; (b,c)$$ present ✔️
3. Take $$(a,c)$$ and combine with every pair beginning with $$c$$:
• $$(a,c),(c,a) \;\Rightarrow\; (a,a)$$ present ✔️
• $$(a,c),(c,c) \;\Rightarrow\; (a,c)$$ present ✔️
4. Take $$(c,c)$$ and combine with every pair beginning with $$c$$:
• $$(c,c),(c,a) \;\Rightarrow\; (c,a)$$ present ✔️
• $$(c,c),(c,c) \;\Rightarrow\; (c,c)$$ present ✔️
5. Take $$(b,c)$$ and combine with every pair beginning with $$c$$:
• $$(b,c),(c,a) \;\Rightarrow\; (b,a)$$ but $$(b,a)\notin R_1$$ ❌
Because the pair $$(b,a)$$ that is required by transitivity is missing, $$R_1$$ is not transitive.
Checking symmetry of $$R_2$$.
We list each pair and its reverse:
• $$(a,b)$$ has reverse $$(b,a)$$ which is in $$R_2$$.
• $$(b,a)$$ has reverse $$(a,b)$$ in $$R_2$$.
• $$(c,a)$$ has reverse $$(a,c)$$ in $$R_2$$.
• $$(c,c),(a,a),(b,b)$$ are all self-symmetric.
All required reverse pairs are present, so $$R_2$$ is symmetric.
Checking transitivity of $$R_2$$.
We again search for a violating instance. Consider
$$(b,a)\in R_2 \quad\text{and}\quad (a,c)\in R_2$$
The definition of transitivity demands $$(b,c)$$ to be in $$R_2$$ because the second element of the first pair equals the first element of the second pair. But the ordered pair $$(b,c)$$ is absent from $$R_2$$.
Therefore, $$R_2$$ is not transitive.
Summarising the properties we have derived:
$$R_1: \text{ not symmetric, not transitive}$$
$$R_2: \text{ symmetric, not transitive}$$
Only the statement “$$R_2$$ is symmetric but it is not transitive” is true.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let N denote the set of all natural numbers. Define two binary relations on N as $$R_1 = \{(x, y) \in N \times N : 2x + y = 10\}$$ and $$R_2 = \{(x, y) \in N \times N : x + 2y = 10\}$$. Then:
We have two relations on the set of natural numbers $$N$$.
The first relation is defined by $$R_1=\{(x,y)\in N\times N:2x+y=10\}$$. To list all ordered pairs of natural numbers that satisfy $$2x+y=10$$ we solve for every admissible integer value of $$x$$.
Let $$x=1\;(\text{natural}),\;2\cdot1+y=10\Rightarrow y=10-2=8.$$ Let $$x=2,\;2\cdot2+y=10\Rightarrow y=10-4=6.$$ Let $$x=3,\;2\cdot3+y=10\Rightarrow y=10-6=4.$$ Let $$x=4,\;2\cdot4+y=10\Rightarrow y=10-8=2.$$ Let $$x=5,\;2\cdot5+y=10\Rightarrow y=10-10=0,$$ which is not a positive natural number, so we stop here. Thus $$R_1=\{(1,8),\,(2,6),\,(3,4),\,(4,2)\}.$
The range of a relation is the set of all second components. Hence $$\text{Range}(R_1)=\{8,6,4,2\}=\{2,4,6,8\}.$$ Option C claims the range is $$\{2,4,8\},$$ which omits $$6,$$ so that statement is false.
Now consider symmetry for $$R_1$$. A relation is symmetric if $$\forall\,(x,y)\in R,\;(y,x)\in R.$$ Because $$(1,8)\in R_1$$ yet $$(8,1)\notin R_1$$ (since $$2\cdot8+1=17\neq10$$), $$R_1$$ is not symmetric. To test transitivity we recall: a relation is transitive if $$(x,y)\in R\;\text{and}\;(y,z)\in R\implies(x,z)\in R.$$ Take the pairs $$(4,2)\in R_1$$ and $$(2,6)\in R_1.$$ Their “middle” element is $$2,$$ so we must check whether $$(4,6)\in R_1.$$ But $$2\cdot4+6=14\neq10,$$ so $$(4,6)\notin R_1.$$ Hence $$R_1$$ is not transitive either.
The second relation is $$R_2=\{(x,y)\in N\times N:x+2y=10\}.$
Again we enumerate:
Let $$y=1,\;x+2\cdot1=10\Rightarrow x=10-2=8.$$ Let $$y=2,\;x+4=10\Rightarrow x=6.$$ Let $$y=3,\;x+6=10\Rightarrow x=4.$$ Let $$y=4,\;x+8=10\Rightarrow x=2.$$ Let $$y=5,\;x+10=10\Rightarrow x=0,$$ not a positive natural number, so we stop. Thus $$R_2=\{(8,1),\,(6,2),\,(4,3),\,(2,4)\}.$$
The range is the set of all second components, so $$\text{Range}(R_2)=\{1,2,3,4\}.$$ This matches exactly what Option B states.
For symmetry of $$R_2$$, observe $$(8,1)\in R_2$$ but $$(1,8)\notin R_2$$ because $$1+2\cdot8=17\neq10.$$ Hence $$R_2$$ is not symmetric.
For transitivity of $$R_2$$ we again use the definition. Take $$(6,2)\in R_2$$ and $$(2,4)\in R_2.$$ Because they chain through the element $$2,$$ we test $$(6,4).$$ Compute $$6+2\cdot4=14\neq10,$$ so $$(6,4)\notin R_2.$$ Thus $$R_2$$ is not transitive.
Summarising our findings:
• Neither relation is symmetric, so Option D is false. • Neither relation is transitive, so Option A is false. • The range of $$R_1$$ is $$\{2,4,6,8\},$$ not $$\{2,4,8\},$$ so Option C is false. • The range of $$R_2$$ is indeed $$\{1,2,3,4\},$$ so Option B is correct.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$f : A \to B$$ be a function defined as $$f(x) = \frac{x-1}{x-2}$$, where $$A = R - \{2\}$$ and $$B = R - \{1\}$$. Then f is:
We are given the function $$f : A \to B$$ with the definition $$f(x)=\dfrac{x-1}{x-2}$$, where the domain is $$A=\mathbb R-\{2\}$$ and the codomain is $$B=\mathbb R-\{1\}$$. Our task is to decide whether the function is invertible and, if it is, to compute its inverse explicitly.
First, we check injectivity. We take two arbitrary points $$x_1, x_2\in A$$ and assume $$f(x_1)=f(x_2)$$. That equality means
$$\dfrac{x_1-1}{x_1-2}=\dfrac{x_2-1}{x_2-2}.$$
Because both denominators are non-zero (each $$x_i\neq2$$), we cross-multiply:
$$ (x_1-1)(x_2-2)=(x_2-1)(x_1-2). $$
We expand each side completely:
$$ x_1x_2-2x_1-x_2+2 = x_1x_2-2x_2-x_1+2. $$
Now we cancel the common term $$x_1x_2$$ on both sides and gather the remaining terms. Subtract the right side from the left side:
$$ (-2x_1 - x_2 + 2) - (-2x_2 - x_1 + 2)=0. $$
Simplifying the expression inside the brackets, we get
$$ -2x_1 - x_2 + 2 + 2x_2 + x_1 - 2 = 0. $$
The constants $$+2$$ and $$-2$$ cancel, leaving
$$ -2x_1 - x_2 + 2x_2 + x_1 = 0. $$
Combining like terms, we have
$$ (-2x_1 + x_1) + (-x_2 + 2x_2) = 0, $$
which is
$$ -x_1 + x_2 = 0. $$
Thus $$x_2 = x_1$$. Because the only way $$f(x_1) = f(x_2)$$ occurs is when the two inputs are identical, the function is injective.
Next, we verify surjectivity onto $$B$$. Let an arbitrary $$y \in B$$ be given. We must find an $$x \in A$$ satisfying $$f(x)=y$$, that is,
$$ y = \dfrac{x-1}{x-2}. $$
We now solve this equation for $$x$$. First we write the relation in the equivalent cross-multiplied form:
$$ y(x-2)=x-1. $$
Expanding the left side gives
$$ yx-2y = x-1. $$
We want to gather all terms containing $$x$$ on one side, so we subtract $$x$$ from both sides:
$$ yx - x - 2y = -1. $$
We factor out $$x$$ from the two terms containing it, using the distributive law $$ax+bx=(a+b)x$$:
$$ x(y-1) - 2y = -1. $$
Now we add $$2y$$ to both sides, yielding
$$ x(y-1) = 2y - 1. $$
Because every $$y \in B$$ satisfies $$y \neq 1$$, the coefficient $$(y-1)$$ is never zero, so we can safely divide by it. Doing so gives us the explicit solution
$$ x = \dfrac{2y-1}{y-1}. $$
The obtained expression is defined for every $$y \neq 1$$, and that is precisely the set $$B$$. We also observe that the value $$x=\dfrac{2y-1}{y-1}$$ can never equal $$2$$, for if it did we would have
$$ 2 = \dfrac{2y-1}{y-1}. $$
Cross-multiplying that hypothetical equality yields $$2y-2=2y-1,$$ which simplifies to $$-2=-1,$$ an impossibility. Hence $$x \neq 2$$, so $$x \in A$$. Therefore, for every $$y\in B$$ we have located an $$x\in A$$ satisfying $$f(x)=y$$, and surjectivity is proved.
Having shown both injectivity and surjectivity, we conclude that $$f$$ is bijective, i.e., invertible. The algebraic manipulation above already produced the inverse correspondence. We merely rewrite it in the standard inverse notation. By definition of an inverse, if $$y=f(x)$$, then $$x=f^{-1}(y)$$. The equation we derived was
$$ x = \dfrac{2y-1}{y-1}. $$
So the inverse function is
$$ f^{-1}(y)=\dfrac{2y-1}{y-1}, \qquad y \in B = \mathbb R-\{1\}. $$
This formula matches exactly what is written in Option D. No other option provides the correct inverse expression, and we have rigorously demonstrated both the bijectivity and the precise inverse.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
The contrapositive of the statement 'If two numbers are not equal, then their squares are not equal', is
Let the two numbers be represented by the real variables $$a$$ and $$b$$.
Define the following two simple statements:
$$P : a \ne b \quad\text{(the numbers are not equal)}$$
$$Q : a^{2} \ne b^{2} \quad\text{(the squares are not equal)}$$
The sentence given in the question, “If two numbers are not equal, then their squares are not equal”, is therefore written symbolically as
$$P \rightarrow Q.$$
To form the contrapositive, recall the logical rule that the contrapositive of any implication $$P \rightarrow Q$$ is $$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P.$$ Here $$\lnot$$ means “not”. We now compute each negation explicitly.
Starting with $$Q$$:
$$Q : a^{2} \ne b^{2}$$
$$\therefore \;\lnot Q : a^{2} = b^{2}$$
Next, deal with $$P$$:
$$P : a \ne b$$
$$\therefore \;\lnot P : a = b$$
Substituting these negations into $$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P$$ gives
$$a^{2} = b^{2} \rightarrow a = b.$$
Expressed verbally, this reads:
“If the squares of two numbers are equal, then the numbers are equal.”
Comparing with the options provided, this statement matches Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
The statement $$p \to q \to (\sim p \to q \to q)$$ is
We have the propositional statement
$$p \;\rightarrow\; q \;\rightarrow\; (\,\sim p \;\rightarrow\; q \;\rightarrow\; q\,).$$
The implication sign $$\rightarrow$$ is taken to be right-associative, so an expression like $$a \rightarrow b \rightarrow c$$ is interpreted as $$a \rightarrow (\,b \rightarrow c\,).$$ Using this convention, our statement can be rewritten (placing all invisible parentheses explicitly) as
$$p \;\rightarrow\; \bigl(\,q \;\rightarrow\; \bigl(\,(\sim p) \;\rightarrow\; (\,q \;\rightarrow\; q\,)\bigr)\bigr).$$
Now we proceed from the innermost part and gradually simplify.
First, consider the sub-statement $$q \;\rightarrow\; q.$$
• By the truth table for implication, a statement of the form $$A \rightarrow A$$ is always true, because:
• If $$A$$ is true, then $$A \rightarrow A$$ has true antecedent and true consequent, so it is true.
• If $$A$$ is false, then $$A \rightarrow A$$ has false antecedent, and an implication with a false antecedent is true.
Hence
$$q \;\rightarrow\; q \equiv \text{T},$$
where “T” denotes the truth constant “always true”.
Substituting this result into the expression, we obtain
$$p \;\rightarrow\; \bigl(\,q \;\rightarrow\; \bigl(\,(\sim p) \;\rightarrow\; \text{T}\bigr)\bigr).$$
Next, look at the part $$(\sim p) \;\rightarrow\; \text{T}.$$
• A basic property of implication is: a statement of the form $$A \rightarrow \text{T}$$ is always true, because its consequent is true regardless of $$A$$. Therefore
$$(\sim p) \;\rightarrow\; \text{T} \equiv \text{T}.$$
Replacing this with “T”, the larger expression simplifies to
$$p \;\rightarrow\; \bigl(\,q \;\rightarrow\; \text{T}\bigr).$$
Again apply the same rule to $$q \;\rightarrow\; \text{T}$$: since the consequent is “T”, we have
$$q \;\rightarrow\; \text{T} \equiv \text{T}.$$
This leaves the outermost implication:
$$p \;\rightarrow\; \text{T}.$$
And finally, by the very same principle, any implication whose consequent is “T” is itself always true, so
$$p \;\rightarrow\; \text{T} \equiv \text{T}.$$
Thus every possible truth-value assignment to $$p$$ and $$q$$ makes the given statement true. Therefore the original statement is a tautology.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The proposition $$(\sim p) \vee (p \wedge \sim q)$$ is equivalent to:
We begin with the given compound proposition
$$ (\sim p)\,\vee\,(p \wedge \sim q). $$
Our goal is to simplify it step by step, using the standard Boolean algebra (logical algebra) identities. The symbols have their usual meanings: $$\sim$$ denotes negation, $$\vee$$ denotes disjunction (OR), and $$\wedge$$ denotes conjunction (AND).
First, we recall the distributive law of logic, stated as
$$ A \;\vee\; (B \wedge C) \;\equiv\; (A \vee B)\; \wedge\; (A \vee C). $$
Here we can identify $$A = \sim p,$$ $$B = p,$$ and $$C = \sim q.$$ Substituting these into the distributive law, we obtain
$$ (\sim p) \;\vee\; (p \wedge \sim q) \;\equiv\; (\sim p \,\vee\, p)\; \wedge\; (\sim p \,\vee\, \sim q). $$
Next, notice that the expression $$\sim p \,\vee\, p$$ is a tautology because a statement OR its negation is always true. Symbolically,
$$ \sim p \,\vee\, p \;\equiv\; \text{True}. $$
When we have a conjunction in which one of the factors is the tautology, the whole conjunction reduces to the other factor. That is, $$\text{True} \wedge X \equiv X.$$ Therefore,
$$ (\sim p \,\vee\, p)\; \wedge\; (\sim p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\equiv\; \text{True} \wedge (\sim p \,\vee\, \sim q) \;\equiv\; (\sim p \,\vee\, \sim q). $$
So we have shown
$$ (\sim p) \,\vee\, (p \wedge \sim q) \;\equiv\; (\sim p \,\vee\, \sim q). $$
Now we recognize another standard logical equivalence: the implication form. The implication
$$ p \to \sim q $$
is, by definition, equivalent to the disjunction
$$ \sim p \,\vee\, \sim q. $$
Since we have just derived the very same disjunction, it follows directly that
$$ (\sim p) \,\vee\, (p \wedge \sim q) \;\equiv\; p \to \sim q. $$
Thus, the original proposition is logically equivalent to the implication $$p \to \sim q,$$ which corresponds to Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The function $$f : N \to I$$ defined by $$f(x) = x - 5\left[\frac{x}{5}\right]$$, where $$N$$ is the set of natural numbers and $$[x]$$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $$x$$, is:
Let $$x$$ be any natural number. Divide $$x$$ by $$5$$ using the usual division algorithm.
There exist unique integers $$q$$ and $$r$$ such that
$$x = 5q + r,$$
where $$q = \left[\dfrac{x}{5}\right]$$ and the remainder $$r$$ satisfies $$0 \le r \lt 5.$$ Explicitly, $$r \in \{0,1,2,3,4\}.$$
Substituting $$x = 5q + r$$ into the definition of the function gives
$$\begin{aligned} f(x) &= x - 5\left[\dfrac{x}{5}\right] \\ &= (5q + r) - 5q \\ &= r. \end{aligned}$$
Thus every natural number is sent to its remainder upon division by $$5,$$ and so
$$\text{Range}(f)=\{0,1,2,3,4\}.$$
To test injectivity (one-one), take two natural numbers that leave the same remainder when divided by $$5.$$ For instance, choose $$x_1 = 2$$ and $$x_2 = 7.$$ Both satisfy
$$f(2)=2,\qquad f(7)=2.$$
Since $$x_1 \ne x_2$$ but $$f(x_1)=f(x_2),$$ the function fails the injectivity criterion. Hence $$f$$ is not one-one.
To test surjectivity (onto) with respect to the stated codomain $$I$$ (the set of all integers), observe that
$$\text{Range}(f)=\{0,1,2,3,4\}\subsetneq I.$$
An integer such as $$6$$ lies in $$I$$ but never appears as an output, because every value of $$f$$ is at most $$4.$$ Therefore the function is not onto.
Because $$f$$ is neither one-one nor onto, the correct choice is the one that says “neither one-one nor onto.”
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The function $$f : R \to \left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right)$$ defined as $$f(x) = \frac{x}{1+x^{2}}$$, is:
We are given the real-valued function
$$f:\; \mathbb R \;\rightarrow\; \left(-\dfrac12,\dfrac12\right), \qquad f(x)=\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}.$$
First we analyse the possible output values (the range) of the function, because this will tell us whether every element of the stated codomain $$\left(-\dfrac12,\dfrac12\right)$$ is actually attained.
To locate maximum and minimum values we differentiate. For a quotient $$\dfrac{u(x)}{v(x)}$$ the quotient rule says
$$\left(\dfrac{u}{v}\right)'=\dfrac{u'v-u\,v'}{v^{2}}.$$
Here $$u(x)=x$$ and $$v(x)=1+x^{2}$$, so $$u'(x)=1$$ and $$v'(x)=2x$$. Substituting into the rule gives
$$f'(x)=\dfrac{1\cdot(1+x^{2})-x\cdot 2x}{(1+x^{2})^{2}} =\dfrac{1+x^{2}-2x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}} =\dfrac{1-x^{2}}{(1+x^{2})^{2}}.$$
The numerator $$1-x^{2}=0$$ when $$x=\pm1$$, so the critical points are $$x=-1$$ and $$x=1$$. We evaluate $$f$$ there:
$$f(1)=\dfrac{1}{1+1^{2}}=\dfrac12, \qquad f(-1)=\dfrac{-1}{1+(-1)^{2}}=-\dfrac12.$$
Because the denominator $$\,(1+x^{2})^{2}\gt 0$$ for every real $$x$$, the sign of $$f'(x)$$ is the sign of $$1-x^{2}$$. Thus
$$ \begin{cases} f'(x)\gt 0 &\text{for }|x|\lt 1,\\[4pt] f'(x)\lt 0 &\text{for }|x|\gt 1. \end{cases} $$
So the function increases on $$(-1,1)$$, decreases on $$(-\infty,-1)$$ and on $$(1,\infty)$$. The point $$x=1$$ therefore gives a global maximum $$\dfrac12$$, and $$x=-1$$ gives a global minimum $$-\dfrac12$$. As $$x\rightarrow\pm\infty$$ we have
$$\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}} =\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}\dfrac{1}{x+1/x} =0,$$
so the graph approaches the $$x$$-axis from both sides without touching it.
Combining all this information, the set of output values is the open interval
$$\left(-\dfrac12,\dfrac12\right).$$
Because the codomain stated in the question is exactly this interval, every element of the codomain appears as an output. Hence the function is surjective (onto).
Next we test whether the function is one-one (injective). A continuous function that first decreases, then increases, and then decreases again cannot be monotonic on the whole of $$\mathbb R$$, so it is very likely not injective. We confirm this by finding two different inputs that give the same output.
Let us choose the value $$y=\dfrac25=0.4$$, which lies strictly between $$0$$ and $$\dfrac12$$. We solve the equation $$f(x)=y$$ algebraically.
Starting from $$\displaystyle y=\dfrac{x}{1+x^{2}}$$ we cross-multiply:
$$y(1+x^{2})=x \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; y + yx^{2} - x = 0.$$
This is a quadratic in $$x$$:
$$y\,x^{2} - x + y = 0.$$
For a quadratic $$ax^{2}+bx+c=0$$ the solutions are given by the quadratic formula
$$x=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}.$$
In our case $$a=y,\,b=-1,\,c=y$$, so
$$x=\dfrac{-(-1)\pm\sqrt{(-1)^{2}-4y^{2}}}{2y} =\dfrac{1\pm\sqrt{1-4y^{2}}}{2y}.$$
Because $$0\lt y\lt \dfrac12$$, the discriminant $$1-4y^{2}$$ is positive, giving two distinct real solutions. Putting our specific choice $$y=\dfrac25$$, we get
$$x_{1}=\dfrac{1-\sqrt{1-\dfrac{16}{25}}}{\dfrac{4}{5}} =\dfrac{1-\sqrt{\dfrac{9}{25}}}{\dfrac45} =\dfrac{1-\dfrac35}{\dfrac45} =\dfrac{\dfrac25}{\dfrac45} =\dfrac12,$$
and
$$x_{2}=\dfrac{1+\sqrt{1-\dfrac{16}{25}}}{\dfrac45} =\dfrac{1+\dfrac35}{\dfrac45} =\dfrac{\dfrac85}{\dfrac45} =2.$$
Thus $$f\!\left(\dfrac12\right)=\dfrac25=f(2).$$ Two different inputs map to the same output, so the function is not injective.
We have shown that
• $$f$$ is surjective onto its codomain $$\left(-\dfrac12,\dfrac12\right)$$,
• $$f$$ is not injective.
Therefore $$f$$ is surjective but not injective, which corresponds to Option C.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let $$a, b, c \in R$$. If $$f(x) = ax^{2} + bx + c$$ is such that $$a + b + c = 3$$ and $$f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) + xy$$, $$\forall$$ $$x, y \in R$$, then $$\sum_{n=1}^{10} f(n)$$ is equal to:
We are told that $$f(x)=ax^{2}+bx+c$$ with real constants $$a,b,c$$ satisfies two conditions:
1. $$a+b+c=3$$.
2. $$f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)+xy$$ for every real pair $$x,y$$.
First we expand the left-hand side of the functional equation. Taking $$f(x)=ax^{2}+bx+c$$ we get
$$ \begin{aligned} f(x+y)&=a(x+y)^{2}+b(x+y)+c \\ &=a(x^{2}+2xy+y^{2})+bx+by+c \\ &=ax^{2}+2axy+ay^{2}+bx+by+c. \end{aligned} $$
Next we write the right-hand side, namely $$f(x)+f(y)+xy$$. Computing separately,
$$ \begin{aligned} f(x)+f(y) &=\bigl(ax^{2}+bx+c\bigr)+\bigl(ay^{2}+by+c\bigr) \\ &=ax^{2}+ay^{2}+bx+by+2c. \end{aligned} $$
Adding the extra $$xy$$ term required by the equation, we obtain
$$f(x)+f(y)+xy=ax^{2}+ay^{2}+bx+by+2c+xy.$$
Because the functional equation holds for all real $$x,y$$, the two expanded expressions must match term by term. We therefore equate coefficients of each power of $$x$$ and $$y$$:
• Coefficient of $$x^{2}$$: $$a=a$$ (already consistent).
• Coefficient of $$y^{2}$$: $$a=a$$ (already consistent).
• Coefficient of the mixed term $$xy$$: we have $$2a$$ on the left and $$1$$ on the right, so
$$2a=1 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; a=\dfrac12.$$
• Constant term: left side has $$c$$ whereas right side has $$2c$$, hence
$$c=2c \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; c=0.$$
With $$a=\dfrac12$$ and $$c=0$$ found, we use the earlier restriction $$a+b+c=3$$ to determine $$b$$:
$$ \frac12 + b + 0 = 3 \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; b = 3-\frac12 = \frac52. $$
Thus the concrete quadratic is
$$f(x)=\frac12x^{2}+\frac52x.$$
Now we need the sum $$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{10}f(n)$$. Substituting our explicit form,
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{10}f(n) =\sum_{n=1}^{10}\left(\frac12n^{2}+\frac52n\right) =\frac12\sum_{n=1}^{10}n^{2}+\frac52\sum_{n=1}^{10}n. $$
We recall the standard summation formulas (stated here for clarity):
• $$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{N} n = \frac{N(N+1)}{2}.$$
• $$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{N} n^{2} = \frac{N(N+1)(2N+1)}{6}.$$
Taking $$N=10$$, we compute each:
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{10} n = \frac{10\cdot11}{2}=55, \qquad \sum_{n=1}^{10} n^{2} = \frac{10\cdot11\cdot21}{6}=385. $$
Substituting these values back, we get
$$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{n=1}^{10}f(n) &=\frac12\,(385)+\frac52\,(55) \\ &=\frac{385}{2}+\frac{275}{2} \\ &=\frac{660}{2}=330. \end{aligned} $$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$f(x) = 2^{10}x + 1$$ and $$g(x) = 3^{10}x - 1$$. If $$(fog)(x) = x$$, then $$x$$ is equal to:
We are given two linear functions.
First function: $$f(x)=2^{10}x+1.$$ Second function: $$g(x)=3^{10}x-1.$$
The statement $$(fog)(x)=x$$ means composition; that is, we must substitute $$g(x)$$ into $$f(x)$$ and equate the result to $$x$$. By definition of composition,
$$ (fog)(x)=f\!\left(g(x)\right). $$
Now we actually perform this substitution. Wherever we see an $$x$$ in $$f(x)=2^{10}x+1$$ we replace it by $$g(x)=3^{10}x-1$$:
$$ f\!\left(g(x)\right)=2^{10}\bigl(g(x)\bigr)+1 =2^{10}\bigl(3^{10}x-1\bigr)+1. $$
The condition tells us that this must equal $$x$$, hence
$$ 2^{10}\bigl(3^{10}x-1\bigr)+1 = x. $$
We expand the left-hand side:
$$ 2^{10}\cdot3^{10}x - 2^{10} + 1 = x. $$
Collect all terms on one side so that everything involving $$x$$ is together:
$$ 2^{10}3^{10}x - x - 2^{10} + 1 = 0. $$
Factor out $$x$$ from the first two terms:
$$ x\bigl(2^{10}3^{10}-1\bigr) -\bigl(2^{10}-1\bigr)=0. $$
Now isolate $$x$$ by adding $$2^{10}-1$$ to both sides and then dividing:
$$ x\bigl(2^{10}3^{10}-1\bigr)=2^{10}-1, $$
so
$$ x=\frac{2^{10}-1}{2^{10}3^{10}-1}. $$
The fraction still does not look exactly like any option because the options contain negative exponents. We therefore manipulate our expression to reveal that form.
Notice that multiplying the numerator and denominator by $$2^{-10}$$ will introduce the reciprocals required. Explicitly:
$$ x=\frac{2^{10}-1}{2^{10}3^{10}-1}\times\frac{2^{-10}}{2^{-10}} =\frac{(2^{10}-1)2^{-10}}{(2^{10}3^{10}-1)2^{-10}}. $$
Compute each product:
Numerator:
$$ (2^{10}-1)2^{-10}=2^{10}2^{-10}-1\cdot2^{-10}=1-2^{-10}. $$
Denominator:
$$ (2^{10}3^{10}-1)2^{-10}=3^{10}(2^{10}2^{-10})-1\cdot2^{-10}=3^{10}-2^{-10}. $$
Therefore
$$ x=\frac{1-2^{-10}}{3^{10}-2^{-10}}. $$
This is exactly the expression listed in Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The Boolean Expression $$(p \wedge \sim q) \vee q \vee (\sim p \wedge q)$$ is equivalent to
We have to simplify the Boolean expression $$E=(p \wedge \sim q)\; \vee\; q\; \vee\; (\sim p \wedge q)$$ and compare the result with the four alternatives.
Because the $$\vee$$ (OR) and $$\wedge$$ (AND) operations are both commutative and associative, we may rearrange the terms without changing the value. Thus we write
$$E \;=\; q \;\vee\; (p \wedge \sim q) \;\vee\; (\sim p \wedge q).$$
Now notice the presence of the term $$q$$ by itself and the compound term $$(\sim p \wedge q).$$ The absorption law of Boolean algebra states that
$$x \;\vee\; (y \wedge x) \;=\; x.$$
Here, let us set $$x = q$$ and $$y = \sim p.$$ Applying the absorption law, we obtain
$$q \;\vee\; (\sim p \wedge q) = q.$$
Substituting this result back into the full expression gives
$$E \;=\; q \;\vee\; (p \wedge \sim q).$$
At this stage, only two terms remain. To proceed further we invoke the distributive law, which in Boolean form states
$$a \;\vee\; (b \wedge c) \;=\; (a \vee b) \;\wedge\; (a \vee c).$$
Assigning $$a = q,\; b = p,\; c = \sim q,$$ we have
$$q \;\vee\; (p \wedge \sim q)\;=\;(q \vee p)\;\wedge\;(q \vee \sim q).$$
The expression $$(q \vee \sim q)$$ is always true (a tautology), because either $$q$$ is true or $$\sim q$$ is true. In Boolean algebra, a tautology is represented by $$1$$. Therefore,
$$(q \vee p)\;\wedge\;1 \;=\; q \vee p.$$
Since the OR operation is commutative, $$q \vee p = p \vee q.$$ Hence the completely simplified form of the original expression is
$$E = p \vee q.$$
Looking at the options provided, this matches Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The contrapositive of the following statement, "If the side of a square doubles, then its area increases four times", is
We begin by identifying the two simple statements that form the given conditional sentence.
Let $$P$$ be the statement “the side of a square doubles”.
Let $$Q$$ be the statement “its area increases four times”.
The original sentence can be written symbolically as the implication $$P \rightarrow Q$$, which reads “If $$P$$ is true, then $$Q$$ is true”.
Now we recall the logical rule for forming a contrapositive. For any implication $$P \rightarrow Q$$, the contrapositive is obtained by first negating both parts and then reversing their order. In symbols, the contrapositive is $$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P$$.
So, applying this rule to our two statements, we have
$$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P$$
where
$$\lnot Q:$$ “the area of a square does not increase four times”,
$$\lnot P:$$ “its side is not doubled”.
Substituting these English negations back into the logical form, we obtain the plain-language contrapositive:
“If the area of a square does not increase four times, then its side is not doubled.”
Comparing this sentence with the four options given:
Option A says: “if the area of a square increases four times, then its side is not doubled.” This keeps $$Q$$ but negates $$P$$, so it is the converse of the inverse, not the contrapositive.
Option B says: “if the area of a square increases four times, then its side is doubled.” That is exactly the original implication $$P \rightarrow Q$$ written in reverse English order; it is the converse, not the contrapositive.
Option C says: “if the area of a square does not increase four times, then its side is not doubled.” This matches $$\lnot Q \rightarrow \lnot P$$ perfectly, so it is the true contrapositive.
Option D says: “if the side of a square is not doubled, then its area does not increase four times.” This has the correct negations but does not reverse the order; it is the inverse, not the contrapositive.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Consider the following two statements:
$$P$$: If 7 is an odd number, then 7 is divisible by 2.
$$Q$$: If 7 is a prime number, then 7 is an odd number.
If $$V_1$$ is the truth value of the contrapositive of $$P$$ and $$V_2$$ is the truth value of contrapositive of $$Q$$, then the ordered pair $$(V_1, V_2)$$ equals
First, we recall the standard logical rule: for any implication of the form $$A \rightarrow B$$ the contrapositive is the statement $$\lnot B \rightarrow \lnot A$$ and both have exactly the same truth value. We will apply this rule separately to the two given statements $$P$$ and $$Q$$, and then determine the ordered pair of their truth values.
We have the statement $$P$$:
$$P:\qquad$$ If $$7$$ is an odd number, then $$7$$ is divisible by $$2.$$
For $$P$$ the antecedent (the “if” part) is
$$A:\;7\text{ is an odd number},$$
and the consequent (the “then” part) is
$$B:\;7\text{ is divisible by }2.$$
Using the contrapositive rule, the contrapositive of $$P$$ is
$$\lnot B \rightarrow \lnot A.$$
Writing it out in words:
If $$7$$ is \emph{not $$divisible by }2,$$ then $$7$$ is \emph{not $$an odd number}.$$
Now, we determine the truth value of this contrapositive:
• The statement “7 is not divisible by 2” is true because 7 divided by 2 does not give an integer quotient.
• The statement “7 is not an odd number” is false because 7 is indeed odd.
In a conditional $$X \rightarrow Y,$$ if the antecedent $$X$$ is true and the consequent $$Y$$ is false, the whole conditional is false. Therefore, the contrapositive of $$P$$ is false. We denote this by
$$V_1 = F.$$
Next, we analyze the statement $$Q$$:
$$Q:\qquad$$ If $$7$$ is a prime number, then $$7$$ is an odd number $$.$$
Here, the antecedent is
$$C:\;7\text{ is a prime number},$$
and the consequent is
$$D:\;7\text{ is an odd number}.$$
The contrapositive of $$Q$$ is
$$\lnot D \rightarrow \lnot C,$$
that is,
If $$7$$ is \emph{not $$an odd number, then }7$$ is \emph{not $$a prime number}.$$
We check its truth value:
• The antecedent “7 is not an odd number” is false because 7 is odd.
• In material implication, whenever the antecedent is false, the entire conditional statement is automatically true, regardless of the consequent.
Hence the contrapositive of $$Q$$ is true, and we write
$$V_2 = T.$$
Collecting the two truth values, we obtain the ordered pair
$$(V_1, V_2) = (F, T).$$
This matches Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
For $$x \in R$$, $$x \neq 0$$, $$x \neq 1$$, let $$f_0(x) = \frac{1}{1-x}$$ and $$f_{n+1}(x) = f_0(f_n(x))$$, $$n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots$$. Then the value of $$f_{100}(3) + f_1\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) + f_2\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)$$ is equal to:
We are given the function $$ f_0(x) = \frac{1}{1-x} $$ for $$ x \in \mathbb{R} $$, $$ x \neq 0 $$, $$ x \neq 1 $$, and the recursive definition $$ f_{n+1}(x) = f_0(f_n(x)) $$ for $$ n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots $$. We need to find the value of $$ f_{100}(3) + f_1\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) + f_2\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) $$.
First, we compute the first few functions to identify a pattern. Start with $$ f_0(x) $$:
$$ f_0(x) = \frac{1}{1-x} $$
Now, compute $$ f_1(x) = f_0(f_0(x)) $$:
$$ f_1(x) = f_0\left( \frac{1}{1-x} \right) = \frac{1}{1 - \frac{1}{1-x}} $$
Simplify the denominator:
$$ 1 - \frac{1}{1-x} = \frac{1-x}{1-x} - \frac{1}{1-x} = \frac{(1-x) - 1}{1-x} = \frac{-x}{1-x} $$
So,
$$ f_1(x) = \frac{1}{\frac{-x}{1-x}} = \frac{1-x}{-x} = -\frac{1-x}{x} = \frac{x-1}{x} $$
Next, compute $$ f_2(x) = f_0(f_1(x)) $$:
$$ f_2(x) = f_0\left( \frac{x-1}{x} \right) = \frac{1}{1 - \frac{x-1}{x}} $$
Simplify the denominator:
$$ 1 - \frac{x-1}{x} = \frac{x}{x} - \frac{x-1}{x} = \frac{x - (x-1)}{x} = \frac{1}{x} $$
So,
$$ f_2(x) = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x}} = x $$
Now, compute $$ f_3(x) = f_0(f_2(x)) $$:
$$ f_3(x) = f_0(f_2(x)) = f_0(x) = \frac{1}{1-x} $$
This is the same as $$ f_0(x) $$. Similarly,
$$ f_4(x) = f_0(f_3(x)) = f_0\left( \frac{1}{1-x} \right) = f_1(x) = \frac{x-1}{x} $$
$$ f_5(x) = f_0(f_4(x)) = f_0\left( \frac{x-1}{x} \right) = f_2(x) = x $$
We observe that the functions repeat every 3 steps: $$ f_3 = f_0 $$, $$ f_4 = f_1 $$, $$ f_5 = f_2 $$, and so on. Thus, the sequence is periodic with period 3, meaning:
$$ f_n(x) = f_{n \mod 3}(x) $$
where:
- If $$ n \equiv 0 \pmod{3} $$, then $$ f_n(x) = f_0(x) = \frac{1}{1-x} $$
- If $$ n \equiv 1 \pmod{3} $$, then $$ f_n(x) = f_1(x) = \frac{x-1}{x} $$
- If $$ n \equiv 2 \pmod{3} $$, then $$ f_n(x) = f_2(x) = x $$
Now, we compute each term in the expression $$ f_{100}(3) + f_1\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) + f_2\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) $$.
First, for $$ f_{100}(3) $$:
Find $$ 100 \mod 3 $$: $$ 100 \div 3 = 33 \times 3 = 99 $$, remainder $$ 100 - 99 = 1 $$, so $$ 100 \equiv 1 \pmod{3} $$. Thus, $$ f_{100}(3) = f_1(3) $$.
Using $$ f_1(x) = \frac{x-1}{x} $$:
$$ f_1(3) = \frac{3-1}{3} = \frac{2}{3} $$
So, $$ f_{100}(3) = \frac{2}{3} $$.
Second, for $$ f_1\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) $$:
Using $$ f_1(x) = \frac{x-1}{x} $$:
$$ f_1\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) = \frac{\frac{2}{3} - 1}{\frac{2}{3}} = \frac{-\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{2}{3}} = -\frac{1}{3} \times \frac{3}{2} = -\frac{1}{2} $$
Third, for $$ f_2\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) $$:
Since $$ f_2(x) = x $$:
$$ f_2\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) = \frac{3}{2} $$
Now, sum the terms:
$$ f_{100}(3) + f_1\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) + f_2\left(\frac{3}{2}\right) = \frac{2}{3} + \left(-\frac{1}{2}\right) + \frac{3}{2} $$
Combine the terms step by step. First, combine the fractions with denominator 2:
$$ -\frac{1}{2} + \frac{3}{2} = \frac{-1 + 3}{2} = \frac{2}{2} = 1 $$
Then add to $$ \frac{2}{3} $$:
$$ \frac{2}{3} + 1 = \frac{2}{3} + \frac{3}{3} = \frac{5}{3} $$
Hence, the value is $$ \frac{5}{3} $$. Comparing with the options:
A. $$ \frac{8}{3} $$
B. $$ \frac{4}{3} $$
C. $$ \frac{5}{3} $$
D. $$ \frac{1}{3} $$
So, the correct answer is Option C.
If $$f(x) + 2f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 3x$$, $$x \neq 0$$, and $$S = \{x \in R : f(x) = f(-x)\}$$, then $$S$$
We are given the functional equation
$$f(x)+2f\!\left(\frac1x\right)=3x,\qquad x\neq0.$$
Our aim is to determine the set
$$S=\{x\in\mathbb R\;:\;f(x)=f(-x)\}.$$
First we must obtain an explicit expression for $$f(x).$$ To do this we write the given relation once for $$x$$ and once for $$\dfrac1x$$.
For $$x$$ itself we already have
$$f(x)+2f\!\left(\frac1x\right)=3x\qquad\text{(1)}.$$
Now replace $$x$$ by $$\dfrac1x$$ everywhere in (1). Because $$x\neq0$$, this substitution is legitimate and yields
$$f\!\left(\frac1x\right)+2f(x)=\frac3x\qquad\text{(2)}.$$
Thus we have a pair of simultaneous linear equations in the two unknowns
$$A=f(x),\qquad B=f\!\left(\frac1x\right).$$
Written explicitly, the system is
$$\begin{cases} A+2B=3x,\\[4pt] 2A+B=\dfrac3x. \end{cases}$$
We now solve this system. From elementary algebra, when we have
$$\begin{cases} A+2B=C_1,\\ 2A+B=C_2, \end{cases}$$
the solution is obtained by elimination. Multiplying the first equation by $$2$$ gives
$$2A+4B=6x\qquad\text{(3)}.$$
Subtract (2) from (3):
$$\bigl(2A+4B\bigr)-\bigl(2A+B\bigr)=6x-\frac3x.$$
The left‐hand side simplifies to $$3B$$, so
$$3B=6x-\frac3x.$$
Dividing by $$3$$ gives
$$B=2x-\frac1x.$$
Thus
$$f\!\left(\frac1x\right)=2x-\frac1x.$$
We substitute this value of $$B$$ back into equation (1):
$$A+2\left(2x-\frac1x\right)=3x.$$
Expanding the brackets we get
$$A+4x-\frac2x=3x.$$
Now isolate $$A$$ (which is $$f(x)$$):
$$A=3x-4x+\frac2x=-x+\frac2x.$$
So we have obtained an explicit formula valid for every non-zero real number:
$$f(x)=-x+\frac2x,\qquad x\neq0.$$
With the function in hand, we can now find $$S.$$ By definition,
$$f(x)=f(-x).$$
Using our formula for $$f$$ on both sides, we write
$$-x+\frac2x \;=\; -(-x)+\frac2{-x}.$$
Carefully simplifying the right‐hand side:
$$-(-x)=x,\qquad\frac2{-x}=-\frac2x,$$
so the equality becomes
$$-x+\frac2x = x-\frac2x.$$
To clear the denominators we multiply both sides by $$x$$ (remember, $$x\neq0$$):
$$x\!\left(-x+\frac2x\right)=x\!\left(x-\frac2x\right).$$
Performing the multiplication term by term, we obtain
$$-x^2+2 = x^2-2.$$
Now we move all terms to one side:
$$-x^2+2-(x^2-2)=0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad -x^2+2-x^2+2=0.$$
This simplifies to
$$-2x^2+4=0.$$
Dividing by $$-2$$ gives
$$x^2-2=0.$$
Finally, solving for $$x$$ we get
$$x^2=2\quad\Longrightarrow\quad x=\pm\sqrt2.$$
Both solutions are non-zero real numbers, so they are admissible. No other real numbers satisfy the equality $$f(x)=f(-x).$$
Therefore
$$S=\{\sqrt2,\,-\sqrt2\},$$
which clearly contains exactly two elements.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Asn (N-terminus): Contains a free primary amine ($$-NH_2$$) and a side-chain primary amide ($$-CONH_2$$).
Ser (C-terminus): Contains a side-chain hydroxyl group ($$-OH$$).
Acetic anhydride ($$Ac_2O$$) in excess acts as a powerful acetylating agent. In the presence of a base ($$Et_3N$$), it replaces the active hydrogen atoms of nucleophilic functional groups with acetyl groups ($$-COCH_3$$ or $$-Ac$$).
Under excess conditions, all accessible nucleophilic sites are acetylated:
N-terminal Amine: $$-NH_2 \xrightarrow{Ac_2O} -NHCOCH_3$$ (Forms an acetamide).
Serine Side-chain: $$-OH \xrightarrow{Ac_2O} -OCOCH_3$$ (Forms an ester).
Asparagine Side-chain: $$-CONH_2 \xrightarrow{Ac_2O} -CONH-COCH_3$$ (Primary amides are acetylated to $$N$$-acetyl amides when the reagent is in excess).
Option B is the correct product because it correctly shows the acetylation of all three reactive sites: the N-terminus, the serine hydroxyl, and the asparagine side-chain amide. The C-terminal carboxylic acid ($$-COOH$$) remains in its acidic form.
Let $$A = \{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_7\}$$ and $$B = \{y_1, y_2, y_3\}$$ be two sets containing seven and three distinct elements respectively. Then the total number of functions $$f : A \rightarrow B$$ that are onto, if there exist exactly three elements $$x$$ in $$A$$ such that $$f(x) = y_2$$, is equal to:
We are asked to count all onto (surjective) functions $$f : A \rightarrow B$$ under the extra condition that exactly three elements of $$A$$ go to the element $$y_2 \in B$$. We begin by recalling what an onto function means. A function $$f$$ is onto when every element of the codomain $$B$$ has at least one pre-image in the domain $$A$$, i.e. for each $$y \in B$$ there exists at least one $$x \in A$$ with $$f(x) = y$$.
First we handle the condition about $$y_2$$. We are told that there are exactly three elements $$x$$ in $$A$$ such that $$f(x) = y_2$$. To choose which elements of $$A$$ they are, we compute
$$ ^7C_3 $$
because $$A$$ contains seven distinct elements and we must select three of them. After this choice is made, these three elements are permanently assigned the image $$y_2$$.
We now investigate what happens to the remaining elements of $$A$$. Once three elements are fixed for $$y_2$$, there are $$7 - 3 = 4$$ elements of $$A$$ left. Call this leftover set $$A'$$. These four elements must be mapped into the remaining two elements of $$B$$, namely $$y_1$$ and $$y_3$$.
Because the overall function is required to be onto, each of $$y_1$$ and $$y_3$$ must appear at least once as a value of $$f$$. So, when distributing the four elements of $$A'$$, neither $$y_1$$ nor $$y_3$$ can be missed. We count these distributions carefully.
For each of the four elements in $$A'$$ we have two immediate choices: send it to $$y_1$$ or send it to $$y_3$$. Ignoring the “at least once” restriction for the moment, this yields $$2^4$$ possibilities. Now we subtract the two unacceptable allocations—either “all go to $$y_1$$” or “all go to $$y_3$$”. Hence the number of admissible ways is
$$ 2^4 - 2 \;=\; 16 - 2 \;=\; 14. $$
Putting the two independent selections together—first the choice of which three elements map to $$y_2$$, and then the admissible distribution of the remaining four elements between $$y_1$$ and $$y_3$$—we multiply the counts:
$$ \text{Total onto functions} \;=\; {^7C_3} \times 14. $$
Thus the required number is $$14 \cdot {^7C_3}$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let $$A$$ and $$B$$ be two sets containing four and two elements respectively. Then the number of subsets of the set $$A \times B$$, each having at least three elements is
We have two finite sets, namely $$A$$ and $$B$$, whose cardinalities are given to be $$|A| = 4$$ and $$|B| = 2$$ respectively.
First, recall the definition of the Cartesian product of two sets.
For any sets $$X$$ and $$Y$$, the Cartesian product $$X \times Y$$ is defined as $$\{(x,y) \mid x \in X,\, y \in Y\}$$.
The number of ordered pairs in $$X \times Y$$ is obtained by the fundamental principle of counting: every element of $$X$$ can be paired with every element of $$Y$$, so the total number of pairs is the product $$|X| \cdot |Y|$$.
Applying this to $$A$$ and $$B$$, we obtain
$$|A \times B| = |A| \times |B| = 4 \times 2 = 8.$$
Thus there are exactly $$8$$ distinct ordered pairs in $$A \times B$$. Consequently, $$A \times B$$ is a set with eight elements.
Next, we are asked to count the subsets of $$A \times B$$ that have at least three elements.
For a set with $$n$$ elements, the total number of all possible subsets (including the empty set) is given by the power set formula $$2^{n}$$.
Here, since $$n = 8$$, the total number of all subsets of $$A \times B$$ is
$$2^{8} = 256.$$
However, this total counts subsets of every possible size, from $$0$$ up to $$8$$. We do not want every subset; we only want those subsets whose size (cardinality) is at least $$3$$. Hence we must subtract the numbers of subsets that have fewer than $$3$$ elements, namely subsets with $$0$$, $$1$$, or $$2$$ elements.
To do that, we employ the binomial coefficient $$\binom{n}{k}$$, which counts the number of subsets of size $$k$$ from an $$n$$-element set.
We therefore compute:
$$\binom{8}{0}$$ gives the number of empty subsets, which is $$1$$.
$$\binom{8}{1}$$ gives the number of single-element subsets, which is $$8$$.
$$\binom{8}{2}$$ gives the number of two-element subsets. Using the combination formula $$\binom{n}{2} = \dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}$$, we obtain
$$\binom{8}{2} = \dfrac{8 \times 7}{2} = 28.$$
Now we add these three quantities to find the total number of subsets that have fewer than three elements:
$$\binom{8}{0} + \binom{8}{1} + \binom{8}{2} = 1 + 8 + 28 = 37.$$
Finally, we subtract this result from the grand total of $$256$$ subsets to get the desired count of subsets with at least three elements:
$$256 - 37 = 219.$$
Therefore, the number of subsets of $$A \times B$$ each having at least three elements is $$219$$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The negation of $$\sim s \vee (\sim r \wedge s)$$ is equivalent to
We want the negation of the statement $$\sim s \vee (\sim r \wedge s)$$. In symbols we therefore start with
$$\neg\bigl(\,\sim s \;\vee\; (\sim r \wedge s)\bigr).$$
First recall De Morgan’s law for two statements: $$\neg(A\vee B)=\neg A\;\wedge\;\neg B.$$ Here we may identify
$$A=\sim s,\qquad B=(\sim r\wedge s).$$
Applying the law gives
$$\neg(\sim s\vee(\sim r\wedge s))=\neg(\sim s)\;\wedge\;\neg(\sim r\wedge s).$$
The first part simplifies directly because double negation cancels:
$$\neg(\sim s)=s.$$
So we now have
$$s\;\wedge\;\neg(\sim r\wedge s).$$
We still need to simplify the second negation. Again, by De Morgan’s law, but this time for a conjunction, $$\neg(A\wedge B)=\neg A\;\vee\;\neg B.$$ Taking
$$A=\sim r,\qquad B=s,$$
we get
$$\neg(\sim r\wedge s)=\neg(\sim r)\;\vee\;\neg s.$$
Double negation on the first term yields
$$\neg(\sim r)=r.$$
Thus
$$\neg(\sim r\wedge s)=r\;\vee\;\neg s.$$
Substituting this back, our whole expression is now
$$s\;\wedge\;(r\;\vee\;\neg s).$$
Next, we distribute the conjunction over the disjunction using the distributive law $$P\wedge(Q\vee R)=(P\wedge Q)\;\vee\;(P\wedge R).$$ Here $$P=s,\;Q=r,\;R=\neg s,$$ so we obtain
$$s\wedge(r\vee\neg s)=(s\wedge r)\;\vee\;(s\wedge\neg s).$$
However, $$s\wedge\neg s$$ is a contradiction and always evaluates to false, so that term can be dropped:
$$(s\wedge r)\;\vee\;\text{false}=s\wedge r.$$
We have therefore shown
$$\neg\bigl(\,\sim s \vee (\sim r \wedge s)\bigr)\equiv s\wedge r.$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Consider the following statements:
P: Suman is brilliant
Q: Suman is rich
R: Suman is honest
The negation of the statement, "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich" can be equivalently expressed as
We are given three statements:
- P: Suman is brilliant
- Q: Suman is rich
- R: Suman is honest
The statement to negate is: "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich".
First, note that "dishonest" means not honest, so it is represented as $$\sim R$$. Therefore, "Suman is brilliant and dishonest" is written as $$P \wedge \sim R$$.
The entire statement "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich" is logically expressed as $$(P \wedge \sim R) \leftrightarrow Q$$.
We need to find the negation of this statement: $$\sim \left[ (P \wedge \sim R) \leftrightarrow Q \right]$$.
Recall that the negation of a biconditional $$A \leftrightarrow B$$ is equivalent to $$A \leftrightarrow \sim B$$. Applying this here, let $$A = P \wedge \sim R$$ and $$B = Q$$. Then:
$$\sim \left[ (P \wedge \sim R) \leftrightarrow Q \right] \equiv (P \wedge \sim R) \leftrightarrow \sim Q$$
Since the biconditional is commutative (i.e., $$X \leftrightarrow Y$$ is the same as $$Y \leftrightarrow X$$), we can rewrite this as:
$$\sim Q \leftrightarrow (P \wedge \sim R)$$
Now, comparing this with the given options:
- Option A: $$\sim Q \leftrightarrow \sim P \vee R$$
- Option B: $$\sim Q \leftrightarrow P \vee \sim R$$
- Option C: $$\sim Q \leftrightarrow P \wedge \sim R$$
- Option D: $$\sim Q \leftrightarrow \sim P \wedge R$$
Our expression $$\sim Q \leftrightarrow (P \wedge \sim R)$$ matches Option C exactly.
Therefore, the negation of the given statement is equivalently expressed as Option C.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The contrapositive of the statement "If it is raining, then I will not come", is
We begin by recalling the fundamental logical rule about contrapositives. For any implication of the form $$P \Rightarrow Q$$, the contrapositive is obtained by simultaneously negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion and reversing their order. In symbols, the contrapositive of $$P \Rightarrow Q$$ is $$\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P$$, where $$\neg$$ stands for “not.” This rule is routinely taught in elementary logic and is guaranteed to give a statement that is logically equivalent to the original implication.
In the given English sentence, the parts can be identified as follows:
• Hypothesis $$P$$ : “It is raining.”
• Conclusion $$Q$$ : “I will not come.”
Translating the original sentence into symbolic form, we have
$$P \Rightarrow Q$$
which reads “If it is raining, then I will not come.”
Now we apply the rule for the contrapositive. First we negate the conclusion $$Q$$. The conclusion “I will not come” is negated to become “I will come.” Symbolically, $$\neg Q$$ means “I will come.”
Next we negate the hypothesis $$P$$. The hypothesis “It is raining” is negated to become “It is not raining.” Symbolically, $$\neg P$$ means “It is not raining.”
Finally, we reverse the order, writing $$\neg Q$$ first and $$\neg P$$ second, and we retain the implication arrow $$\Rightarrow$$ between them. Thus the contrapositive is expressed symbolically as
$$\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P$$
which translates back into English as
“If I will come, then it is not raining.”
Comparing this English sentence with the four options provided, we see that it matches exactly with Option A:
Option A. if I will come, then it is not raining.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
The contrapositive of the statement "if I am not feeling well, then I will go to the doctor" is:
To solve this problem, we need to find the contrapositive of the given statement: "if I am not feeling well, then I will go to the doctor."
First, recall that for any conditional statement of the form "If P, then Q," the contrapositive is "If not Q, then not P." The contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original statement.
Identify the components of the given statement:
- P: "I am not feeling well"
- Q: "I will go to the doctor"
So the statement is: If P, then Q.
Now, form the contrapositive: If not Q, then not P.
Determine not Q and not P:
- not Q: Negation of "I will go to the doctor" is "I will not go to the doctor."
- not P: Negation of "I am not feeling well" is "I am feeling well" (since two negatives cancel out).
Therefore, the contrapositive is: "If I will not go to the doctor, then I am feeling well."
Now, compare this with the options:
- Option A: "if I will go to the doctor, then I am not feeling well" → This is "If Q, then P," which is the converse, not the contrapositive.
- Option B: "if I am feeling well, then I will not go to the doctor" → This is "If not P, then not Q," which is the inverse, not the contrapositive.
- Option C: "if I will not go to the doctor, then I am feeling well" → This matches our contrapositive exactly: "If not Q, then not P."
- Option D: "if I will go to the doctor, then I am feeling well" → This is "If Q, then not P," which is neither the contrapositive nor logically equivalent.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let p, q, r denote arbitrary statements. Then the logically equivalent of the statement $$p \Rightarrow (q \vee r)$$ is:
We are given the statement $$ p \Rightarrow (q \vee r) $$ and need to find which option is logically equivalent to it. Remember that $$ a \Rightarrow b $$ is equivalent to $$ \sim a \vee b $$. So, let's rewrite the given statement:
$$ p \Rightarrow (q \vee r) = \sim p \vee (q \vee r) $$
Since disjunction (OR) is associative, we can write this as:
$$ \sim p \vee q \vee r $$
Now, we'll check each option by converting them into equivalent forms using the same implication rule.
Option A: $$ (p \vee q) \Rightarrow r $$
Rewrite the implication:
$$ (p \vee q) \Rightarrow r = \sim (p \vee q) \vee r $$
Apply De Morgan's law to $$ \sim (p \vee q) $$:
$$ (\sim p \wedge \sim q) \vee r $$
This is not the same as $$ \sim p \vee q \vee r $$ because it has a conjunction ($$\wedge$$) and different terms. For example, if $$ p $$ is false, $$ q $$ is false, and $$ r $$ is false, the original statement is true (since $$ \sim p $$ is true), but this expression becomes $$ (\text{true} \wedge \text{true}) \vee \text{false} = \text{true} \vee \text{false} = \text{true} $$. However, if $$ p $$ is true, $$ q $$ is false, and $$ r $$ is false, the original is false (true implies false), but this expression is $$ (\text{false} \wedge \text{true}) \vee \text{false} = \text{false} \vee \text{false} = \text{false} $$, which matches. But let's test another case: $$ p $$ false, $$ q $$ true, $$ r $$ false. Original: false implies (true or false) = false implies true = true. Option A: $$ (\text{false} \vee \text{true}) \Rightarrow \text{false} = \text{true} \Rightarrow \text{false} = \text{false} $$. Not the same. So, not equivalent.
Option B: $$ (p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \Rightarrow r) $$
Rewrite each implication:
$$ p \Rightarrow q = \sim p \vee q $$
$$ p \Rightarrow r = \sim p \vee r $$
So the expression becomes:
$$ (\sim p \vee q) \vee (\sim p \vee r) $$
Since disjunction is associative and commutative, rearrange:
$$ \sim p \vee \sim p \vee q \vee r $$
Simplify ($$ \sim p \vee \sim p = \sim p $$):
$$ \sim p \vee q \vee r $$
This matches the original expression exactly. So, option B is equivalent.
Option C: $$ (p \Rightarrow \sim q) \wedge (p \Rightarrow r) $$
Rewrite each implication:
$$ p \Rightarrow \sim q = \sim p \vee \sim q $$
$$ p \Rightarrow r = \sim p \vee r $$
So the expression is:
$$ (\sim p \vee \sim q) \wedge (\sim p \vee r) $$
Factor out $$ \sim p $$ using distribution:
$$ \sim p \vee (\sim q \wedge r) $$
This is not the same as $$ \sim p \vee q \vee r $$. For example, if $$ p $$ is true, $$ q $$ is true, and $$ r $$ is false, the original statement is true (true implies (true or false) = true implies true = true), but this expression is $$ \text{false} \vee (\text{false} \wedge \text{false}) = \text{false} \vee \text{false} = \text{false} $$. Not equivalent.
Option D: $$ (p \Rightarrow q) \wedge (p \Rightarrow \sim r) $$
Rewrite each implication:
$$ p \Rightarrow q = \sim p \vee q $$
$$ p \Rightarrow \sim r = \sim p \vee \sim r $$
So the expression is:
$$ (\sim p \vee q) \wedge (\sim p \vee \sim r) $$
Factor out $$ \sim p $$:
$$ \sim p \vee (q \wedge \sim r) $$
This is not the same as $$ \sim p \vee q \vee r $$. For example, if $$ p $$ is true, $$ q $$ is false, and $$ r $$ is true, the original statement is true (true implies (false or true) = true implies true = true), but this expression is $$ \text{false} \vee (\text{false} \wedge \text{false}) = \text{false} \vee \text{false} = \text{false} $$. Not equivalent.
Therefore, only option B is logically equivalent to the given statement. Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The statement $$\sim(p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$$ is:
We have to examine the statement $$\sim\!\left(p \leftrightarrow \sim q\right)$$ and decide which description among the four alternatives fits it.
First, recall the standard logical equivalence formula for a biconditional. We state it explicitly:
$$p \leftrightarrow r \;\equiv\; (p \wedge r)\;\vee\;(\sim p \wedge \sim r).$$
The symbol “$$\equiv$$” means “is logically equivalent to.” In our problem the role of $$r$$ is played by $$\sim q$$, so we substitute $$r = \sim q$$:
$$p \leftrightarrow \sim q \;\equiv\; \bigl(p \wedge \sim q\bigr)\;\vee\;\bigl(\sim p \wedge \sim(\sim q)\bigr).$$
Because a double negation cancels, $$\sim(\sim q)=q$$. Substituting this, we simplify the right-hand side:
$$p \leftrightarrow \sim q \;\equiv\; \bigl(p \wedge \sim q\bigr)\;\vee\;\bigl(\sim p \wedge q\bigr).$$
Now our original expression contains the negation of this whole biconditional, so we negate what we have just obtained:
$$\sim\!\left(p \leftrightarrow \sim q\right) \;\equiv\; \sim\!\Bigl[\, \bigl(p \wedge \sim q\bigr)\;\vee\;\bigl(\sim p \wedge q\bigr)\Bigr].$$
Next we invoke De Morgan’s law, which states
$$\sim(A \vee B) \;\equiv\; (\sim A) \wedge (\sim B).$$
Identifying $$A = (p \wedge \sim q)$$ and $$B = (\sim p \wedge q)$$, we apply the law:
$$\sim\!\left(p \leftrightarrow \sim q\right) \;\equiv\; \bigl(\sim(p \wedge \sim q)\bigr)\;\wedge\;\bigl(\sim(\sim p \wedge q)\bigr).$$
Each of the two negations inside the brackets can again be opened with De Morgan’s law, this time in its conjunctive form
$$\sim(X \wedge Y) \;\equiv\; (\sim X) \vee (\sim Y).$$
For the first bracket we have $$X=p$$ and $$Y=\sim q$$, giving
$$\sim(p \wedge \sim q) \;\equiv\; (\sim p) \vee \bigl(\sim(\sim q)\bigr).$$
The double negation $$\sim(\sim q)$$ collapses to $$q$$, so the first bracket becomes
$$\sim(p \wedge \sim q) \;\equiv\; (\sim p) \vee q.$$
For the second bracket we have $$X=\sim p$$ and $$Y=q$$, yielding
$$\sim(\sim p \wedge q) \;\equiv\; \bigl(\sim(\sim p)\bigr) \vee (\sim q).$$
Again the double negation $$\sim(\sim p)$$ reduces to $$p$$, giving
$$\sim(\sim p \wedge q) \;\equiv\; p \vee (\sim q).$$
Collecting both results, we have transformed the original statement into
$$\sim\!\left(p \leftrightarrow \sim q\right) \;\equiv\; \bigl((\sim p) \vee q\bigr)\;\wedge\;\bigl(p \vee (\sim q)\bigr).$$
Thus
$$\boxed{\; \sim\!\left(p \leftrightarrow \sim q\right) \;\equiv\; (\sim p \vee q)\;\wedge\;(p \vee \sim q) \;}$$
We now show that the right-hand side is exactly $$p \leftrightarrow q$$. To see this, we once more recall the biconditional formula, this time with $$r=q$$:
$$p \leftrightarrow q \;\equiv\; (p \wedge q)\;\vee\;(\sim p \wedge \sim q).$$
One way to verify equivalence of two compound statements is to check that their truth tables match. Below are the four possible truth-value assignments for $$p$$ and $$q$$, and the resulting truth values of $$(\sim p \vee q)\wedge(p \vee \sim q)$$:
$$ \begin{array}{c|c||c|c|c} p & q & \sim p \vee q & p \vee \sim q & \text{Conjunction} \\ \hline T & T & T & T & T\\ T & F & F & T & F\\ F & T & T & F & F\\ F & F & T & T & T \end{array} $$
The last column reads T, F, F, T—precisely the truth pattern of $$p \leftrightarrow q$$. Hence
$$ (\sim p \vee q)\;\wedge\;(p \vee \sim q) \;\equiv\; p \leftrightarrow q. $$
Combining this with the boxed equivalence obtained earlier, we finally deduce
$$\boxed{\; \sim\!\left(p \leftrightarrow \sim q\right) \;\equiv\; p \leftrightarrow q \;}$$
This matches Option C in the given list. It is therefore neither a tautology nor a fallacy in isolation; it is simply equivalent to another specific biconditional.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The proposition $$\sim (p \vee \sim q) \vee \sim (p \vee q)$$ is logically equivalent to:
We start with the proposition: $$\sim (p \vee \sim q) \vee \sim (p \vee q)$$.
First, apply De Morgan's law to both parts. De Morgan's law states that $$\sim (A \vee B) = (\sim A) \wedge (\sim B)$$.
For the left part: $$\sim (p \vee \sim q)$$. Here, $$A = p$$ and $$B = \sim q$$, so:
$$\sim (p \vee \sim q) = (\sim p) \wedge \sim(\sim q)$$.
Since $$\sim(\sim q) = q$$, this simplifies to:
$$(\sim p) \wedge q$$.
For the right part: $$\sim (p \vee q)$$. Here, $$A = p$$ and $$B = q$$, so:
$$\sim (p \vee q) = (\sim p) \wedge (\sim q)$$.
Now the expression becomes:
$$(\sim p \wedge q) \vee (\sim p \wedge \sim q)$$.
Notice that $$\sim p$$ is common in both terms. Factor out $$\sim p$$:
$$\sim p \wedge (q \vee \sim q)$$.
We know that $$q \vee \sim q$$ is always true (tautology), because either $$q$$ is true or false. So:
$$q \vee \sim q = \text{True}$$.
Substitute this back:
$$\sim p \wedge \text{True}$$.
Any proposition AND True is the proposition itself. Therefore:
$$\sim p \wedge \text{True} = \sim p$$.
So, the original proposition simplifies to $$\sim p$$.
Comparing with the options:
A. p
B. q
C. $$\sim p$$
D. $$\sim q$$
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
A relation on the set A = {x : |x| < 3, x $$\in$$ Z}, where Z is the set of integers is defined by R = {(x, y) : y = |x|, x $$\neq$$ $$-1$$}. Then the number of elements in the power set of R is:
First, we need to understand the set A. The set A is defined as A = {x : |x| < 3, x ∈ Z}, where Z is the set of integers. This means A consists of all integers x such that the absolute value of x is less than 3. The condition |x| < 3 translates to -3 < x < 3. Since x must be an integer, we list all integers satisfying this inequality: x = -2, because | -2 | = 2 < 3; x = -1, because | -1 | = 1 < 3; x = 0, because |0| = 0 < 3; x = 1, because |1| = 1 < 3; and x = 2, because |2| = 2 < 3. Note that x = -3 is not included because | -3 | = 3 is not less than 3, and similarly x = 3 is not included. Therefore, A = {-2, -1, 0, 1, 2}.
Next, we define the relation R on the set A. The relation is given as R = {(x, y) : y = |x|, x ≠ -1}. This means R consists of ordered pairs (x, y) where y is the absolute value of x, and x is not equal to -1. Since R is a relation on A, both x and y must be elements of A.
We now list all possible pairs (x, y) that satisfy the condition. The elements of A are x = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2. However, the condition x ≠ -1 excludes x = -1. So we consider the remaining x values: -2, 0, 1, 2.
For each x, we compute y = |x|:
- When x = -2, y = | -2 | = 2, so the pair is (-2, 2).
- When x = 0, y = |0| = 0, so the pair is (0, 0).
- When x = 1, y = |1| = 1, so the pair is (1, 1).
- When x = 2, y = |2| = 2, so the pair is (2, 2).
We must ensure that each y is in A. Checking: y = 2 is in A, y = 0 is in A, y = 1 is in A, and y = 2 is in A. Also, there is no pair for x = -1 because it is excluded. Therefore, the relation R consists of the ordered pairs: (-2, 2), (0, 0), (1, 1), and (2, 2). Thus, R has 4 elements.
Now, we need to find the power set of R, denoted P(R). The power set of a set is the set of all its subsets. If a set has n elements, the number of elements in its power set is $$2^n$$. Here, R has 4 elements, so the number of elements in P(R) is $$2^4$$.
Calculating: $$2^4 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 = 16$$. Therefore, the power set of R has 16 elements.
Looking at the options: A. 32, B. 16, C. 8, D. 64. The value 16 corresponds to option B. Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
The contrapositive of the statement "I go to school if it does not rain" is:
If $$X = \{4^n - 3n - 1 : n \in N\}$$ and $$Y = \{9(n-1) : n \in N\}$$, where $$N$$ is the set of natural numbers, then $$X \cup Y$$ is equal to:
We have two sets of natural-number valued expressions
$$X=\{\,4^{\,n}-3n-1 : n\in N\,\} \quad\text{and}\quad Y=\{\,9(n-1) : n\in N\,\},$$ where $$N=\{1,2,3,\dots\}.$$
Our task is to identify the union $$X\cup Y.$$ To do this we shall show that every element of $$X$$ is already present in $$Y.$$ If that is true then $$X\subseteq Y,$$ and consequently $$X\cup Y=Y.$$
For any natural number $$n,$$ consider the expression
$$4^{\,n}-3n-1.$$
We want to see whether this number is a multiple of $$9.$$ A convenient way to check divisibility by $$9$$ is to look at the remainder (the “modulus”) of the number when divided by $$9.$$ Hence we examine $$4^{\,n}\pmod 9.$$
First, note that
$$4\equiv 4\pmod 9,$$
$$4^{\,2}=16\equiv 7\pmod 9,$$
$$4^{\,3}=64\equiv 1\pmod 9.$$
The remainders repeat every three powers because $$4^{\,3}=1\pmod 9\;\Longrightarrow\;4^{\,3k}=1\pmod 9,$$ and multiplying by another $$4$$ or $$4^{\,2}$$ gives the other two remainders. So we have the periodic pattern
$$4^{\,n}\equiv \begin{cases} 4,& n\equiv 1\pmod 3,\\[6pt] 7,& n\equiv 2\pmod 3,\\[6pt] 1,& n\equiv 0\pmod 3. \end{cases}$$
Now write $$n=3k,\,3k+1,$$ or $$3k+2,$$ and compute the whole expression modulo $$9$$ in each case.
1. If $$n=3k,$$ then $$4^{\,n}\equiv 1.$$ So
$$4^{\,n}-3n-1 =1-3(3k)-1 =1-9k-1 =-9k \equiv 0\pmod 9.$$
2. If $$n=3k+1,$$ then $$4^{\,n}\equiv 4.$$ So
$$4^{\,n}-3n-1 =4-3(3k+1)-1 =4-9k-3-1 =-9k \equiv 0\pmod 9.$$
3. If $$n=3k+2,$$ then $$4^{\,n}\equiv 7.$$ So
$$4^{\,n}-3n-1 =7-3(3k+2)-1 =7-9k-6-1 =-9k \equiv 0\pmod 9.$$
In every case the remainder is zero, so
$$9\;\big\vert\;\bigl(4^{\,n}-3n-1\bigr).$$
Therefore, for each $$n\in N$$ there exists some non-negative integer $$m$$ such that
$$4^{\,n}-3n-1=9m.$$
But the set $$Y=\{9(n-1):n\in N\}$$ contains every non-negative multiple of $$9$$ (namely $$0,9,18,27,\dots$$). Hence the number $$9m$$ we obtained is automatically an element of $$Y.$$ So we have proved
$$X\subseteq Y.$$
Because the union of a set with its superset is the superset itself, we now have
$$X\cup Y=Y.$$
Thus the union equals $$Y,$$ which corresponds to Option B.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$P$$ be the relation defined on the set of all real numbers such that $$P = \{(a, b) : \sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1\}$$. Then, $$P$$ is:
The relation $$P$$ is defined on the set of all real numbers as $$P = \{(a, b) : \sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1\}$$. However, $$\sec a$$ and $$\tan b$$ are undefined when $$a$$ or $$b$$ is an odd multiple of $$\pi/2$$, i.e., $$a = (2k+1)\pi/2$$ or $$b = (2k+1)\pi/2$$ for any integer $$k$$. Therefore, the domain $$D$$ for which the relation is defined consists of all real numbers except these points. We will check the properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity for $$P$$ on this domain $$D$$.
Reflexivity: A relation is reflexive if for every $$a$$ in the domain, $$(a, a)$$ is in $$P$$. For any $$a \in D$$, we need to check if $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 a = 1$$. Using the trigonometric identity $$\sec^2 \theta - \tan^2 \theta = 1$$, which holds for all $$\theta$$ where both functions are defined, we have $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 a = 1$$. Thus, $$(a, a) \in P$$ for all $$a \in D$$. Therefore, $$P$$ is reflexive.
Symmetry: A relation is symmetric if whenever $$(a, b) \in P$$, then $$(b, a) \in P$$. Assume $$(a, b) \in P$$, so $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1$$. We need to show that $$\sec^2 b - \tan^2 a = 1$$. From the given condition, $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1$$. Rearranging, $$\sec^2 a = 1 + \tan^2 b$$. Using the identity $$\sec^2 b = 1 + \tan^2 b$$, we substitute to get $$\sec^2 b = 1 + \tan^2 b$$. Similarly, $$\tan^2 a = \sec^2 a - 1 = (1 + \tan^2 b) - 1 = \tan^2 b$$. Now, $$\sec^2 b - \tan^2 a = (1 + \tan^2 b) - \tan^2 a$$. Since $$\tan^2 a = \tan^2 b$$, this becomes $$1 + \tan^2 b - \tan^2 b = 1$$. Thus, $$\sec^2 b - \tan^2 a = 1$$, so $$(b, a) \in P$$. Therefore, $$P$$ is symmetric.
Transitivity: A relation is transitive if whenever $$(a, b) \in P$$ and $$(b, c) \in P$$, then $$(a, c) \in P$$. Assume $$(a, b) \in P$$ and $$(b, c) \in P$$, so $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1$$ and $$\sec^2 b - \tan^2 c = 1$$. We need to show $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 c = 1$$. From $$(a, b) \in P$$, $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 b = 1$$, so $$\sec^2 a = 1 + \tan^2 b$$. From $$(b, c) \in P$$, $$\sec^2 b - \tan^2 c = 1$$, so $$\tan^2 c = \sec^2 b - 1$$. Now, $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 c = (1 + \tan^2 b) - (\sec^2 b - 1)$$. Since $$\sec^2 b = 1 + \tan^2 b$$, substitute to get $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 c = 1 + \tan^2 b - [(1 + \tan^2 b) - 1] = 1 + \tan^2 b - [\tan^2 b] = 1$$. Thus, $$\sec^2 a - \tan^2 c = 1$$, so $$(a, c) \in P$$. Therefore, $$P$$ is transitive.
Since $$P$$ is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive on its domain, it is an equivalence relation.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Let $$f : R \to R$$ be defined by $$f(x) = \frac{|x|-1}{|x|+1}$$, then f is:
We are given a function $$ f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} $$ defined by $$ f(x) = \frac{|x| - 1}{|x| + 1} $$. We need to determine if this function is one-one (injective), onto (surjective), both, or neither. A function is one-one if different inputs always give different outputs, meaning if $$ f(a) = f(b) $$, then $$ a = b $$. A function is onto if every element in the codomain is mapped to by some element in the domain, meaning for every real number $$ y $$, there exists some $$ x $$ such that $$ f(x) = y $$. The codomain here is all real numbers, $$ \mathbb{R} $$.
First, we check if the function is one-one. Notice that the expression depends on $$ |x| $$, which is always non-negative. For any $$ x $$, $$ |x| = |-x| $$, so let us compute $$ f(-x) $$:
$$ f(-x) = \frac{|-x| - 1}{|-x| + 1} = \frac{|x| - 1}{|x| + 1} = f(x). $$
This shows that $$ f(-x) = f(x) $$ for all $$ x $$. Therefore, for any $$ x \neq 0 $$, we have $$ f(x) = f(-x) $$, but $$ x $$ and $$ -x $$ are different if $$ x \neq 0 $$. For example, let $$ x = 1 $$:
$$ f(1) = \frac{|1| - 1}{|1| + 1} = \frac{1 - 1}{1 + 1} = \frac{0}{2} = 0. $$
Now, $$ f(-1) = \frac{|-1| - 1}{|-1| + 1} = \frac{1 - 1}{1 + 1} = \frac{0}{2} = 0 $$. So $$ f(1) = f(-1) = 0 $$, but $$ 1 \neq -1 $$. Since two different inputs ($$ 1 $$ and $$ -1 $$) give the same output ($$ 0 $$), the function is not one-one.
Next, we check if the function is onto. To be onto, for every real number $$ y $$, there must be some $$ x $$ such that $$ f(x) = y $$. Since $$ f(x) $$ depends only on $$ |x| $$, we set $$ t = |x| \geq 0 $$. Then the function becomes:
$$ g(t) = \frac{t - 1}{t + 1}, \quad t \geq 0. $$
We need to find the range of $$ g(t) $$ as $$ t $$ varies from 0 to infinity. This range will be the same as the range of $$ f(x) $$, because for each $$ t \geq 0 $$, there is at least one $$ x $$ (for example, $$ x = t $$ or $$ x = -t $$) such that $$ |x| = t $$.
Evaluate $$ g(t) $$ at key points:
- When $$ t = 0 $$: $$ g(0) = \frac{0 - 1}{0 + 1} = \frac{-1}{1} = -1 $$.
- When $$ t = 1 $$: $$ g(1) = \frac{1 - 1}{1 + 1} = \frac{0}{2} = 0 $$.
- As $$ t \to \infty $$: $$ g(t) = \frac{t - 1}{t + 1} = \frac{1 - \frac{1}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \to \frac{1 - 0}{1 + 0} = 1 $$.
Now, check if $$ g(t) $$ can equal 1: set $$ \frac{t - 1}{t + 1} = 1 $$. Then $$ t - 1 = t + 1 $$, which simplifies to $$ -1 = 1 $$, a contradiction. So $$ g(t) \neq 1 $$ for any $$ t \geq 0 $$.
To see how $$ g(t) $$ behaves, compute its derivative. Let $$ g(t) = \frac{t - 1}{t + 1} $$. Using the quotient rule:
$$ g'(t) = \frac{(1)(t + 1) - (t - 1)(1)}{(t + 1)^2} = \frac{t + 1 - (t - 1)}{(t + 1)^2} = \frac{t + 1 - t + 1}{(t + 1)^2} = \frac{2}{(t + 1)^2}. $$
Since $$ (t + 1)^2 > 0 $$ for all $$ t \geq 0 $$, we have $$ g'(t) > 0 $$, so $$ g(t) $$ is strictly increasing for $$ t \geq 0 $$.
As $$ t $$ increases from 0 to infinity, $$ g(t) $$ increases continuously from $$ g(0) = -1 $$ to the limit 1 (but never reaches 1). Therefore, the range of $$ g(t) $$ is all real numbers from -1 inclusive to 1 exclusive, denoted as $$ [-1, 1) $$.
Since $$ f(x) $$ has the same range $$ [-1, 1) $$, we can see that:
- $$ y = -1 $$ is achieved when $$ x = 0 $$ (since $$ f(0) = \frac{|0| - 1}{|0| + 1} = \frac{-1}{1} = -1 $$).
- Values between -1 and 1 are achieved; for example, for $$ y = 0.5 $$, solve $$ \frac{t - 1}{t + 1} = 0.5 $$: $$ t - 1 = 0.5(t + 1) \implies t - 1 = 0.5t + 0.5 \implies t - 0.5t = 0.5 + 1 \implies 0.5t = 1.5 \implies t = 3. $$ So $$ |x| = 3 $$, meaning $$ x = 3 $$ or $$ x = -3 $$, and $$ f(3) = \frac{|3| - 1}{|3| + 1} = \frac{3 - 1}{3 + 1} = \frac{2}{4} = 0.5 $$.
- But $$ y = 1 $$ is not achieved, as shown earlier.
Now, consider values outside $$ [-1, 1) $$. For example, $$ y = 2 $$:
Set $$ f(x) = 2 $$: $$ \frac{|x| - 1}{|x| + 1} = 2 \implies |x| - 1 = 2(|x| + 1) \implies |x| - 1 = 2|x| + 2 \implies -1 - 2 = 2|x| - |x| \implies -3 = |x| $$. But $$ |x| \geq 0 $$, so $$ |x| = -3 $$ is impossible. Similarly, for $$ y = -2 $$: $$ \frac{|x| - 1}{|x| + 1} = -2 \implies |x| - 1 = -2(|x| + 1) \implies |x| - 1 = -2|x| - 2 \implies |x| + 2|x| = -2 + 1 \implies 3|x| = -1 $$, again impossible.
Thus, the range of $$ f $$ is $$ [-1, 1) $$, which is a proper subset of the codomain $$ \mathbb{R} $$. For instance, $$ y = 1 $$ and $$ y = 2 $$ are in $$ \mathbb{R} $$ but not in the range. Therefore, $$ f $$ is not onto.
Since $$ f $$ is not one-one and not onto, it is neither injective nor surjective.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Let $$A = \{\theta : \sin(\theta) = \tan(\theta)\}$$ and $$B = \{\theta : \cos(\theta) = 1\}$$ be two sets. Then :
First, we need to understand the sets A and B.
Set A is defined as $$ A = \{\theta : \sin(\theta) = \tan(\theta)\} $$.
Recall that $$ \tan(\theta) = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)} $$, so we substitute this into the equation:
$$ \sin(\theta) = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)} $$
Note that $$ \tan(\theta) $$ is undefined when $$ \cos(\theta) = 0 $$, so we must exclude these points. Therefore, $$ \cos(\theta) \neq 0 $$.
Multiply both sides by $$ \cos(\theta) $$ (since it is not zero):
$$ \sin(\theta) \cdot \cos(\theta) = \sin(\theta) $$
Bring all terms to one side:
$$ \sin(\theta) \cdot \cos(\theta) - \sin(\theta) = 0 $$
Factor out $$ \sin(\theta) $$:
$$ \sin(\theta) (\cos(\theta) - 1) = 0 $$
This equation holds if either factor is zero:
$$ \sin(\theta) = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \cos(\theta) - 1 = 0 $$
Which simplifies to:
$$ \sin(\theta) = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \cos(\theta) = 1 $$
Now, we must ensure that these solutions satisfy $$ \cos(\theta) \neq 0 $$.
Case 1: $$ \sin(\theta) = 0 $$.
The solutions are $$ \theta = n\pi $$, where $$ n $$ is any integer.
At these points, $$ \cos(\theta) = \cos(n\pi) = (-1)^n $$, which is either 1 or -1, never zero. So these are valid.
Case 2: $$ \cos(\theta) = 1 $$.
The solutions are $$ \theta = 2m\pi $$, where $$ m $$ is any integer.
At these points, $$ \cos(\theta) = 1 \neq 0 $$, so they are valid.
Notice that when $$ \cos(\theta) = 1 $$, $$ \theta = 2m\pi $$, which is included in $$ \theta = n\pi $$ (by letting $$ n = 2m $$). Also, $$ \sin(2m\pi) = 0 $$, so the condition $$ \sin(\theta) = 0 $$ covers both cases. Therefore, the complete solution set for A is:
$$ A = \{\theta : \theta = n\pi, n \in \mathbb{Z}\} $$
Now, set B is defined as $$ B = \{\theta : \cos(\theta) = 1\} $$. The solutions are:
$$ B = \{\theta : \theta = 2m\pi, m \in \mathbb{Z}\} $$
We compare A and B.
First, note that every element of B is in A: if $$ \theta = 2m\pi $$, then $$ \theta = n\pi $$ with $$ n = 2m $$ (an even integer), so $$ B \subset A $$.
However, A contains additional points not in B. For example, take $$ \theta = \pi $$:
- $$ \pi \in A $$ because $$ \sin(\pi) = 0 $$ and $$ \tan(\pi) = 0 $$, so $$ 0 = 0 $$.
- But $$ \cos(\pi) = -1 \neq 1 $$, so $$ \pi \notin B $$.
Similarly, $$ \theta = -\pi, 3\pi, $$ etc., are in A but not in B.
Therefore, A is not a subset of B because there are elements in A that are not in B.
Now, examine the options:
A. A = B → False, because A has more elements (like $$ \pi $$) than B.
B. $$ A \not\subset B $$ → True, because A is not a subset of B (as shown with $$ \theta = \pi $$).
C. $$ B \not\subset A $$ → False, because B is a subset of A (as established).
D. $$ A \subset B $$ and $$ B - A \neq \phi $$ → False, because $$ A \subset B $$ is false (as above), and even if we consider the second part, $$ B - A $$ is empty since $$ B \subset A $$, so $$ B - A = \phi $$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
For integers $$m$$ and $$n$$, both greater than 1, consider the following three statements : P : m divides n Q : m divides $$n^2$$ R : m is prime, then
We are given three statements for integers $$m$$ and $$n$$, both greater than 1:
- P: $$m$$ divides $$n$$ (i.e., $$n$$ is divisible by $$m$$, written as $$m \mid n$$)
- Q: $$m$$ divides $$n^2$$ (i.e., $$m \mid n^2$$)
- R: $$m$$ is prime
We need to evaluate the logical implications given in the options and determine which one is always true.
Starting with Option A: $$Q \wedge R \rightarrow P$$. This means if Q and R are both true, then P must be true. That is, if $$m$$ divides $$n^2$$ and $$m$$ is prime, then $$m$$ divides $$n$$.
Assume Q and R are true: $$m \mid n^2$$ and $$m$$ is prime. Since $$m$$ is prime and divides $$n^2$$, and $$n^2 = n \times n$$, by Euclid's lemma (which states that if a prime divides a product, it must divide at least one factor), $$m$$ must divide $$n$$. Therefore, P is true. This implication holds.
Now, Option B: $$P \wedge Q \rightarrow R$$. This means if P and Q are true, then R must be true. That is, if $$m$$ divides $$n$$ and $$m$$ divides $$n^2$$, then $$m$$ is prime.
Note that if P is true ($$m \mid n$$), then Q ($$m \mid n^2$$) is automatically true because if $$n = m \cdot k$$ for some integer $$k$$, then $$n^2 = m \cdot (m \cdot k^2)$$, so $$m \mid n^2$$. Thus, the premise $$P \wedge Q$$ reduces to P being true. But the conclusion requires $$m$$ to be prime, which may not hold. For example, let $$m = 4$$ (composite) and $$n = 4$$. Then P: $$4 \mid 4$$ is true (since $$4 = 4 \times 1$$), and Q: $$4 \mid 16$$ is true (since $$16 = 4 \times 4$$), but R: $$m = 4$$ is not prime. Since the premise is true and the conclusion is false, this implication is not always true.
Option C: $$Q \rightarrow R$$. This means if Q is true, then R must be true. That is, if $$m$$ divides $$n^2$$, then $$m$$ is prime.
This is not always true. For example, let $$m = 4$$ and $$n = 2$$. Then Q: $$4 \mid 2^2 = 4$$ is true (since $$4 = 4 \times 1$$), but R: $$m = 4$$ is not prime. Thus, this implication is false.
Option D: $$Q \rightarrow P$$. This means if Q is true, then P must be true. That is, if $$m$$ divides $$n^2$$, then $$m$$ divides $$n$$.
This is not always true. For example, let $$m = 4$$ and $$n = 2$$. Then Q: $$4 \mid 2^2 = 4$$ is true, but P: $$4 \mid 2$$ is false (since $$2 \div 4 = 0.5$$, not an integer). Another example: $$m = 9$$ and $$n = 3$$. Then Q: $$9 \mid 3^2 = 9$$ is true (since $$9 = 9 \times 1$$), but P: $$9 \mid 3$$ is false. Hence, this implication is false.
Only Option A is always true. Therefore, the correct answer is Option A.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$p$$ and $$q$$ be any two logical statements and $$r : p \rightarrow (\sim p \vee q)$$. If $$r$$ has a truth value $$F$$, then the truth values of $$p$$ and $$q$$ are respectively:
We are given that $$ r: p \rightarrow (\sim p \vee q) $$ has a truth value of false (F). We need to find the truth values of $$ p $$ and $$ q $$ that make $$ r $$ false.
Recall that an implication $$ a \rightarrow b $$ is false only when $$ a $$ is true and $$ b $$ is false. For $$ r $$ to be false, we must have:
- $$ p $$ is true (T), and
- $$ \sim p \vee q $$ is false (F).
Now, a disjunction (OR) like $$ \sim p \vee q $$ is false only when both components are false. Therefore:
- $$ \sim p $$ must be false (F), and
- $$ q $$ must be false (F).
If $$ \sim p $$ is false, then $$ p $$ must be true (T), because the negation of true is false and vice versa. This matches the first condition that $$ p $$ is true.
Thus, we have:
- $$ p = \text{T} $$
- $$ q = \text{F} $$
Let us verify these truth values by substituting them into $$ r $$.
If $$ p $$ is true (T), then $$ \sim p $$ is false (F).
Now, $$ \sim p \vee q = \text{F} \vee \text{F} = \text{F} $$ (since both are false).
Then, $$ r: p \rightarrow (\sim p \vee q) = \text{T} \rightarrow \text{F} $$.
We know that true implies false is false (T → F = F), which matches the given condition that $$ r $$ is false.
Therefore, the truth values of $$ p $$ and $$ q $$ are true (T) and false (F) respectively.
Looking at the options:
- A. F, F
- B. T, T
- C. T, F
- D. F, T
Option C matches T, F.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
The statement $$p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow p)$$ is equivalent to :
We are given the statement $$ p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow p) $$ and need to find which option it is equivalent to. Recall that the implication $$ a \rightarrow b $$ is logically equivalent to $$ \neg a \vee b $$. We will use this equivalence to simplify the given statement step by step.
First, consider the inner implication $$ q \rightarrow p $$. Using the equivalence, we rewrite it as $$ \neg q \vee p $$. So the entire statement becomes:
$$ p \rightarrow (\neg q \vee p) $$
Now, apply the equivalence to the outer implication $$ p \rightarrow (\neg q \vee p) $$. This becomes:
$$ \neg p \vee (\neg q \vee p) $$
Disjunction (OR) is associative, meaning we can regroup the terms without changing the meaning. So we write:
$$ (\neg p \vee p) \vee \neg q $$
Notice that $$ \neg p \vee p $$ is a tautology, meaning it is always true, regardless of the truth value of $$ p $$. Therefore:
$$ \neg p \vee p = \text{true} $$
Substituting this, we get:
$$ \text{true} \vee \neg q $$
The disjunction of true and any statement is always true. So:
$$ \text{true} \vee \neg q = \text{true} $$
Thus, the original statement $$ p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow p) $$ simplifies to true, meaning it is a tautology (always true).
Now, we check each option to see which one is also a tautology and equivalent to true.
Option A: $$ p \rightarrow q $$
Rewrite using equivalence:
$$ \neg p \vee q $$
This is not always true. For example, when $$ p $$ is true and $$ q $$ is false, $$ \neg p \vee q = \text{false} \vee \text{false} = \text{false} $$. So it is not a tautology and not equivalent to the original statement.
Option B: $$ p \rightarrow (p \vee q) $$
Rewrite using equivalence:
$$ \neg p \vee (p \vee q) $$
Associativity allows regrouping:
$$ (\neg p \vee p) \vee q $$
Again, $$ \neg p \vee p = \text{true} $$, so:
$$ \text{true} \vee q = \text{true} $$
This is a tautology. Therefore, it is equivalent to the original statement.
Option C: $$ p \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q) $$
First, rewrite the inner implication $$ p \rightarrow q $$ as $$ \neg p \vee q $$. So the statement becomes:
$$ p \rightarrow (\neg p \vee q) $$
Apply equivalence to the outer implication:
$$ \neg p \vee (\neg p \vee q) $$
Associativity and idempotence (since $$ \neg p \vee \neg p = \neg p $$):
$$ (\neg p \vee \neg p) \vee q = \neg p \vee q $$
This is $$ \neg p \vee q $$, which is the same as $$ p \rightarrow q $$. As in Option A, this is not a tautology (e.g., false when $$ p $$ is true and $$ q $$ is false). So it is not equivalent to the original statement.
Option D: $$ p \rightarrow (p \wedge q) $$
Rewrite using equivalence:
$$ \neg p \vee (p \wedge q) $$
Distribute $$ \vee $$ over $$ \wedge $$:
$$ (\neg p \vee p) \wedge (\neg p \vee q) $$
Now, $$ \neg p \vee p = \text{true} $$, so:
$$ \text{true} \wedge (\neg p \vee q) = \neg p \vee q $$
Again, this is $$ \neg p \vee q $$, same as $$ p \rightarrow q $$, which is not a tautology. So it is not equivalent to the original statement.
Only Option B simplifies to true, making it a tautology and equivalent to the original statement $$ p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow p) $$.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
Consider :
Statement - I : $$(p \wedge \sim q) \wedge (\sim p \wedge q)$$ is a fallacy.
Statement - II : $$(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim q \rightarrow \sim p)$$ is a tautology.
First we recall some basic logical equivalences that we shall use again and again.
Implication : $$\, (A \rightarrow B)\; \equiv\; (\sim A)\,\vee\,B \,.$$ Biconditional : $$\, (X \leftrightarrow Y)\; \equiv\; (X \wedge Y)\,\vee\,(\sim X \wedge \sim Y)\;.$$ Associative and commutative laws allow us to rearrange and regroup the symbols $$\wedge$$ and $$\vee$$ freely.
Now we examine Statement I :
We have $$ (p \wedge \sim q) \wedge (\sim p \wedge q). $$ Because the conjunction $$\wedge$$ is associative, the brackets may be dropped one at a time:
$$ (p \wedge \sim q) \wedge (\sim p \wedge q) \;=\; p \wedge \sim q \wedge \sim p \wedge q. $$
Next, with the commutative law we collect like symbols together:
$$ p \wedge \sim p \wedge \sim q \wedge q. $$
Inside the expression we clearly see $$p \wedge \sim p$$ and also $$q \wedge \sim q$$. Each of these pairs is always false because a statement and its negation can never be true simultaneously. Hence
$$ p \wedge \sim p \;=\; \text{False}, \qquad q \wedge \sim q \;=\; \text{False}. $$
So the whole conjunction becomes
$$ \text{False} \wedge \text{False} \;=\; \text{False}. $$
The result does not depend on the particular truth-values of $$p$$ or $$q$$; it is always false. A statement that is always false is called a fallacy. Therefore Statement I is true.
Next we analyse Statement II :
We start with the given biconditional $$ (p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim q \rightarrow \sim p). $$
Using the implication formula quoted at the beginning, we transform each part separately.
First, $$ p \rightarrow q \;\equiv\; \sim p \,\vee\, q. $$
Second, we handle the contrapositive implication carefully. Applying $$(A \rightarrow B) \equiv (\sim A) \vee B$$ with $$A = \sim q$$ and $$B = \sim p$$ we obtain
$$ \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \;\equiv\; \sim(\sim q) \,\vee\, \sim p \;=\; q \,\vee\, \sim p. $$
Notice that the disjunction $$q \vee \sim p$$ is identical to $$\sim p \vee q$$ because $$\vee$$ is commutative. Hence we can write
$$ q \vee \sim p \;=\; \sim p \vee q. $$
So both sides of the biconditional are in fact the same formula:
$$ (p \rightarrow q) \;\equiv\; \sim p \vee q, $$ $$ (\sim q \rightarrow \sim p) \;\equiv\; \sim p \vee q. $$
Therefore the whole statement becomes
$$ (\sim p \vee q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q). $$
A biconditional of any statement with itself, i.e. $$X \leftrightarrow X,$$ is always true, because both possible parts in the definition $$(X \wedge X) \vee (\sim X \wedge \sim X)$$ are automatically satisfied. Hence the biconditional above is always true; that is, it is a tautology. So Statement II is also true.
We must still decide whether Statement II provides a correct explanation for Statement I. Statement II merely tells us that an implication is equivalent to its contrapositive; it does not explain why the particular conjunction in Statement I is always false. Thus, while both statements are true, Statement II is not the reason for Statement I.
The situation matches Option D.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D.
Statement-1: The statement $$A \rightarrow (B \rightarrow A)$$ is equivalent to $$A \rightarrow (A \vee B)$$.
Statement-2: The statement $$\sim [(A \wedge B) \rightarrow (\sim A \vee B)]$$ is a Tautology.
We are given two statements and need to evaluate their truth values and the relationship between them. The options are based on whether each statement is true or false and if Statement-2 explains Statement-1.
First, we address Statement-1: The statement $$A \rightarrow (B \rightarrow A)$$ is equivalent to $$A \rightarrow (A \vee B)$$. Two statements are equivalent if they have the same truth value for all possible truth values of their variables. We will use truth tables to verify this.
Construct a truth table for both expressions. Since there are two variables, A and B, there are four combinations of truth values.
For $$A \rightarrow (B \rightarrow A)$$:
- Implication $$P \rightarrow Q$$ is false only when P is true and Q is false; otherwise, it is true.
- $$B \rightarrow A$$ is equivalent to $$\neg B \vee A$$.
For $$A \rightarrow (A \vee B)$$:
- $$A \vee B$$ is false only when both A and B are false; otherwise, it is true.
The truth table is as follows:
| A | B | B → A | A ∨ B | A → (B → A) | A → (A ∨ B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T → T = T | T ∨ T = T | T → T = T | T → T = T |
| T | F | F → T = T | T ∨ F = T | T → T = T | T → T = T |
| F | T | T → F = F | F ∨ T = T | F → F = T | F → T = T |
| F | F | F → F = T | F ∨ F = F | F → T = T | F → F = T |
In all rows, both expressions evaluate to true. Therefore, $$A \rightarrow (B \rightarrow A)$$ and $$A \rightarrow (A \vee B)$$ are both tautologies and hence equivalent. So, Statement-1 is true.
Now, we address Statement-2: The statement $$\sim [(A \wedge B) \rightarrow (\sim A \vee B)]$$ is a tautology. A tautology is a statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its variables.
We simplify the given expression step by step:
- Recall that $$P \rightarrow Q$$ is equivalent to $$\neg P \vee Q$$.
- So, $$(A \wedge B) \rightarrow (\sim A \vee B)$$ is equivalent to $$\neg (A \wedge B) \vee (\sim A \vee B)$$.
- The negation of the implication is $$\sim [(A \wedge B) \rightarrow (\sim A \vee B)] = \sim [\neg (A \wedge B) \vee (\sim A \vee B)]$$.
- By De Morgan's law, $$\sim [\neg (A \wedge B) \vee (\sim A \vee B)] = (A \wedge B) \wedge \sim (\sim A \vee B)$$.
- Now, $$\sim (\sim A \vee B) = \sim (\sim A) \wedge \sim B = A \wedge \sim B$$ (by De Morgan's law).
- So, the expression becomes $$(A \wedge B) \wedge (A \wedge \sim B)$$.
- Simplify: $$(A \wedge B) \wedge (A \wedge \sim B) = A \wedge A \wedge B \wedge \sim B = A \wedge (B \wedge \sim B) = A \wedge \text{false} = \text{false}$$.
The expression simplifies to false, which is a contradiction (always false). Therefore, it cannot be a tautology. So, Statement-2 is false.
We can also verify with a truth table:
| A | B | A ∧ B | ∼A | ∼A ∨ B | (A ∧ B) → (∼A ∨ B) | ∼[(A ∧ B) → (∼A ∨ B)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | F | T | T → T = T | ∼T = F |
| T | F | F | F | F | F → F = T | ∼T = F |
| F | T | F | T | T | F → T = T | ∼T = F |
| F | F | F | T | T | F → T = T | ∼T = F |
In every row, the expression $$\sim [(A \wedge B) \rightarrow (\sim A \vee B)]$$ is false. Hence, it is a contradiction, not a tautology. Thus, Statement-2 is false.
Now, evaluating the options:
- Option A: Statement-1 false; Statement-2 true → Incorrect, as Statement-1 is true and Statement-2 is false.
- Option B: Both true; Statement-2 not correct explanation → Incorrect, as Statement-2 is false.
- Option C: Statement-1 true; Statement-2 false → Correct.
- Option D: Both true; Statement-2 correct explanation → Incorrect, as Statement-2 is false.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let $$R = \{(x, y) : x, y \in N$$ and $$x^2 - 4xy + 3y^2 = 0\}$$, where N is the set of all natural numbers. Then the relation R is :
Let $$R = \{(3,3)(5,5),(9,9),(12,12),(5,12),(3,9),(3,12),(3,5)\}$$ be a relation on the set $$A = \{3, 5, 9, 12\}$$. Then, R is :
We are given a relation $$R = \{(3,3), (5,5), (9,9), (12,12), (5,12), (3,9), (3,12), (3,5)\}$$ on the set $$A = \{3, 5, 9, 12\}$$. We need to determine whether $$R$$ is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
First, recall the definitions:
- A relation is reflexive if every element in $$A$$ is related to itself, i.e., $$(a, a) \in R$$ for all $$a \in A$$.
- A relation is symmetric if whenever $$(a, b) \in R$$, then $$(b, a) \in R$$.
- A relation is transitive if whenever $$(a, b) \in R$$ and $$(b, c) \in R$$, then $$(a, c) \in R$$.
Now, let's check each property step by step.
Reflexivity: The set $$A = \{3, 5, 9, 12\}$$. Check if each element has a pair with itself in $$R$$:
- For 3: $$(3,3) \in R$$ (given).
- For 5: $$(5,5) \in R$$ (given).
- For 9: $$(9,9) \in R$$ (given).
- For 12: $$(12,12) \in R$$ (given).
Symmetry: Check for every pair $$(a, b) \in R$$, if $$(b, a) \in R$$. List all pairs:
- $$(3,3)$$: Reverse is $$(3,3)$$, which is in $$R$$.
- $$(5,5)$$: Reverse is $$(5,5)$$, which is in $$R$$.
- $$(9,9)$$: Reverse is $$(9,9)$$, which is in $$R$$.
- $$(12,12)$$: Reverse is $$(12,12)$$, which is in $$R$$.
- $$(5,12)$$: Reverse is $$(12,5)$$. Is $$(12,5) \in R$$? Looking at the given pairs, $$(12,5)$$ is not listed. So, $$(12,5) \notin R$$.
- $$(3,9)$$: Reverse is $$(9,3)$$. Is $$(9,3) \in R$$? Not listed, so $$(9,3) \notin R$$.
- $$(3,12)$$: Reverse is $$(12,3)$$. Is $$(12,3) \in R$$? Not listed, so $$(12,3) \notin R$$.
- $$(3,5)$$: Reverse is $$(5,3)$$. Is $$(5,3) \in R$$? Not listed, so $$(5,3) \notin R$$.
Transitivity: Check if whenever $$(a, b) \in R$$ and $$(b, c) \in R$$, then $$(a, c) \in R$$. We need to verify all possible chains:
- Consider $$(3,5)$$ and $$(5,12)$$: Both are in $$R$$. Then $$(3,12)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is (given).
- Consider $$(3,3)$$ and $$(3,5)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(3,5)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(3,3)$$ and $$(3,9)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(3,9)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(3,3)$$ and $$(3,12)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(3,12)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(3,5)$$ and $$(5,5)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(3,5)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(5,5)$$ and $$(5,12)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(5,12)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(5,12)$$ and $$(12,12)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(5,12)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(3,9)$$ and $$(9,9)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(3,9)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
- Consider $$(3,12)$$ and $$(12,12)$$: Both in $$R$$. Then $$(3,12)$$ should be in $$R$$, and it is.
Now, check other possible chains:
- Is there a pair starting with 9? Only $$(9,9)$$, so no chain with another element.
- Is there a pair starting with 12? Only $$(12,12)$$, so no chain with another element.
- We have $$(3,9)$$ but no pair starting with 9 except $$(9,9)$$, so no issue.
- Similarly, $$(3,12)$$ and $$(12,12)$$ is covered.
No counterexample is found. Thus, $$R$$ is transitive.
In summary:
- Reflexive: Yes
- Symmetric: No
- Transitive: Yes
Now, compare with the options:
- A: reflexive, symmetric but not transitive → Incorrect, as $$R$$ is not symmetric.
- B: symmetric, transitive but not reflexive → Incorrect, as $$R$$ is reflexive and not symmetric.
- C: an equivalence relation → Incorrect, as equivalence requires all three properties, but symmetry fails.
- D: reflexive, transitive but not symmetric → Correct.
Let $$A$$ and $$B$$ be two sets containing 2 elements and 4 elements respectively. The number of subsets of $$A \times B$$ having 3 or more elements is :
We begin by noting the basic facts given in the question. The set $$A$$ contains $$2$$ elements, and the set $$B$$ contains $$4$$ elements. Whenever we form the Cartesian product $$A \times B$$, each element of $$A$$ pairs with every element of $$B$$.
By definition of Cartesian product, the total number of ordered pairs in $$A \times B$$ equals the product of the individual cardinalities:
$$|A \times B| \;=\; |A| \times |B|.$$
Substituting the given sizes, we obtain
$$|A \times B| \;=\; 2 \times 4 \;=\; 8.$$
So, the set $$A \times B$$ has exactly $$8$$ elements.
Next, we recall a standard counting fact: a finite set with $$n$$ elements possesses $$2^n$$ distinct subsets. Stating this formally, if a set has $$n$$ elements, then
$$\text{Number of all subsets} \;=\; 2^n.$$
Applying this to our situation with $$n = 8$$, we have
$$\text{Total subsets of }A \times B \;=\; 2^8 \;=\; 256.$$
However, the problem does not ask for all subsets. It asks only for those subsets that contain three or more elements. Therefore we must exclude the subsets of sizes $$0$$, $$1$$, and $$2$$ from the grand total of $$256$$.
To exclude them accurately, we use the combination formula. The number of ways to choose $$k$$ elements from an $$n$$-element set is given by the binomial coefficient
$$\binom{n}{k} \;=\; \frac{n!}{k!\,(n-k)!}.$$
For our set with $$n = 8$$, we compute:
$$ \begin{aligned} \binom{8}{0} &= 1, \\ \binom{8}{1} &= 8, \\ \binom{8}{2} &= 28. \end{aligned} $$
The total number of “small” subsets (those having fewer than $$3$$ elements) is therefore
$$\binom{8}{0} \;+\; \binom{8}{1} \;+\; \binom{8}{2} \;=\; 1 + 8 + 28 \;=\; 37.$$
Now we subtract these $$37$$ unwanted subsets from the complete collection of $$256$$ subsets:
$$256 \;-\; 37 \;=\; 219.$$
This final result, $$219$$, is precisely the number of subsets of $$A \times B$$ that contain $$3$$ or more elements.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A.
Let $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ and $$R : A \rightarrow A$$ be the relation defined by $$R = \{(1,1), (2,3), (3,4), (4,2)\}$$. The correct statement is :
First, we need to check if the relation $$R$$ is a function. A relation from set $$A$$ to set $$A$$ is a function if every element in the domain $$A$$ is mapped to exactly one element in the codomain $$A$$. Here, $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$ and $$R = \{(1,1), (2,3), (3,4), (4,2)\}$$.
Examine each element of $$A$$:
For element 1, the pair $$(1,1)$$ maps it to 1, so $$R(1) = 1$$.
For element 2, the pair $$(2,3)$$ maps it to 3, so $$R(2) = 3$$.
For element 3, the pair $$(3,4)$$ maps it to 4, so $$R(3) = 4$$.
For element 4, the pair $$(4,2)$$ maps it to 2, so $$R(4) = 2$$.
Since every element in $$A$$ has exactly one image in $$A$$, $$R$$ is a function. Therefore, option D, which states "R is not a function," is incorrect.
Next, we check if $$R$$ is one-to-one (injective). A function is one-to-one if different inputs produce different outputs, meaning if $$R(a) = R(b)$$, then $$a = b$$.
List the outputs:
$$R(1) = 1$$, $$R(2) = 3$$, $$R(3) = 4$$, $$R(4) = 2$$.
The outputs are 1, 3, 4, and 2, all distinct. Since no two different inputs share the same output, $$R$$ is one-to-one. Therefore, option B, which states "R is not a one to one function," is incorrect.
Now, check if $$R$$ is onto (surjective). A function is onto if every element in the codomain is mapped to by some element in the domain. The codomain is $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$.
Check each element:
Is 1 mapped to? Yes, because $$R(1) = 1$$, so 1 is the image of 1.
Is 2 mapped to? Yes, because $$R(4) = 2$$, so 2 is the image of 4.
Is 3 mapped to? Yes, because $$R(2) = 3$$, so 3 is the image of 2.
Is 4 mapped to? Yes, because $$R(3) = 4$$, so 4 is the image of 3.
Since every element in the codomain $$A$$ is an image of some element in the domain, $$R$$ is onto. Therefore, option C, which states "R is an onto function," is correct.
To address option A, since $$R$$ is both one-to-one and onto, it is bijective. A bijective function has an inverse. The inverse function $$R^{-1}$$ can be found by swapping the pairs: $$R^{-1} = \{(1,1), (3,2), (4,3), (2,4)\}$$, which is equivalent to $$R^{-1}(1) = 1$$, $$R^{-1}(2) = 4$$, $$R^{-1}(3) = 2$$, $$R^{-1}(4) = 3$$. This is a valid function, so $$R$$ has an inverse. Therefore, option A, which states "R does not have an inverse," is incorrect.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
Let $$X = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$$. The number of different ordered pairs $$(Y, Z)$$ that can be formed such that $$Y \subseteq X$$, $$Z \subseteq X$$ and $$Y \cap Z$$ is empty, is
The logically equivalent proposition of $$p \Leftrightarrow q$$ is
If $$A = \{x \in z^+ : x < 10$$ and $$x$$ is a multiple of $$3$$ or $$4\}$$, where $$z^+$$ is the set of positive integers, then the total number of symmetric relations on $$A$$ is
Let $$p$$ and $$q$$ be two Statements. Amongst the following, the Statement that is equivalent to $$p \to q$$ is
The negation of the statement "If I become a teacher, then I will open a school" is
The Statement that is TRUE among the following is
Let $$p$$ and $$q$$ denote the following statements $$p$$: The sun is shining; $$q$$: I shall play tennis in the afternoon. The negation of the statement "If the sun is shining then I shall play tennis in the afternoon", is
Let $$A$$ and $$B$$ be non empty sets in $$R$$ and $$f : A \to B$$ is a bijective function. Statement 1: $$f$$ is an onto function. Statement 2: There exists a function $$g : B \to A$$ such that $$f \circ g = I_B$$.
The range of the function $$f(x) = \dfrac{x}{1+|x|}, x \in R$$, is
Consider the following statements P: Suman is brilliant; Q: Suman is rich; R: Suman is honest. The negation of the statement "Suman is brilliant and dishonest if and only if Suman is rich" can be expressed as:
Let $$R$$ be the set of real numbers. This question has Statement-1 and Statement-2. Of the four choices given after the statements, choose the one that best describes the two statements. Statement-1: $$A = \{(x, y) \in R \times R : y - x \text{ is an integer}\}$$ is an equivalence relation on $$R$$. Statement-2: $$B = \{(x, y) \in R \times R : x = \alpha y \text{ for some rational number } \alpha\}$$ is an equivalence relation on $$R$$.
The domain of the function $$f(x) = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{|x| - x}}$$ is:
Let $$S$$ be a non-empty subset of $$R$$. Consider the following statement: P: There is a rational number $$x \in S$$ such that $$x > 0$$. Which of the following statements is the negation of the statement $$P$$?
Consider the following relations: $$R = \{(x, y) \mid x, y \text{ are real numbers and } x = wy \text{ for some rational number } w\}$$; $$S = \left\{\left(\frac{m}{n}, \frac{p}{q}\right) \mid m, n, p \text{ and } q \text{ are integers such that } n, q \ne 0 \text{ and } qm = pn\right\}$$. Then
Statement-1: $$\sim (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$$ is equivalent to $$p \leftrightarrow q$$. Statement-2: $$\sim (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$$ is a tautology.
If $$A, B$$ and $$C$$ are three sets such that $$A \cap B = A \cap C$$ and $$A \cup B = A \cup C$$, then
For real $$x$$, let $$f(x) = x^3 + 5x + 1$$, then
Let $$f(x) = (x + 1)^2 - 1, x \geq -1$$. Statement-1: The set $$\{x : f(x) = f^{-1}(x)\} = \{0, -1\}$$ Statement-2 : f is a bijection.
Let $$p$$ be the statement "$$x$$ is an irrational number", $$q$$ be the statement "$$y$$ is a transcendental number", and $$r$$ be the statement "$$x$$ is a rational number iff $$y$$ is a transcendental number". Statement-1: $$r$$ is equivalent to either $$q$$ or $$p$$. Statement-2: $$r$$ is equivalent to $$\sim(p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$$.
The statement $$p \to (q \to p)$$ is equivalent to
Let $$R$$ be the real line. Consider the following subsets of the plane $$R \times R$$: $$S = \{(x, y) : y = x + 1\ \text{and}\ 0 < x < 2\},\ T = \{(x, y) : x - y\ \text{is an integer}\}$$. Which one of the following is true?
Let $$f: N \to Y$$ be a function defined as $$f(x) = 4x + 3$$, where $$Y = \{y \in N : y = 4x + 3$$ for some $$x \in N\}$$. Show that f is invertible and its inverse is
The largest interval lying in $$\left(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}\right)$$ for which the function $$\left[f(x) = 4^{-x^2} + \cos^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{2} - 1\right) + \log(\cos x)\right]$$ is defined, is
Let $$W$$ denote the words in the English dictionary. Define the relation $$R$$ by : $$R = \{(x, y) \in W \times W \mid$$ the words $$x$$ and $$y$$ have at least one letter in common $$\}$$. Then $$R$$ is
Let $$R = \{(3, 3), (6, 6), (9, 9), (12, 12), (6, 12), (3, 9), (3, 12), (3, 6)\}$$ be a relation on the set $$A = \{3, 6, 9, 12\}$$. The relation is
A real valued function $$f(x)$$ satisfies the functional equation $$f(x - y) = f(x)f(y) - f(a - x) f(a + y)$$ where $$a$$ is a given constant and $$f(0) = 1$$, $$f(2a - x)$$ is equal to
Let $$R = \{(1, 3), (4, 2), (2, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1)\}$$ be a relation on the set $$A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$$. The relation $$R$$ is
If $$f: R \to S$$, defined by $$f(x) = \sin x - \sqrt{3}\cos x + 1$$, is onto, then the interval of $$S$$ is
The graph of the function $$y = f(x)$$ is symmetrical about the line $$x = 2$$, then
The domain of the function $$f(x) = \frac{\sin^{-1}(x - 3)}{\sqrt{9 - x^2}}$$ is