CRTICAL REASONING Statement : The "No frills" domestic airlines are boon to the common man. Arguments: 1. Yes, it is a very profitable business to be in because of large volumes. 2. No, trains are very comfortable and also stop at many more stations.

Hi!

If the purpose of your question is to test the relevance of the arguments, then the statement is not strongly related to any of the arguments.

Argument 1 discusses the profitability of the airline sector, but that does not prove that low-cost carriers benefit the general public.

Although Argument 2 makes a comparison between trains and aeroplanes, it does not assert that aeroplanes are superior to trains.

Because neither argument addresses whether low-cost airlines benefit the average person, neither is compelling.

Hi bro , is this your first CAT attempt ?