SNAP Reasoning, Statements and Conclusions Questions

Should a terrorist who has killed a large number of people be executed?

Arguments:
I: Yes, since killing him will set a good precedent and prevent any future damage he is likely to cause had he been alive.
II: No, since killing a person is a violation of human rights.

Statement:
Should unauthorized buildings in the city be demolished?
Conclusions:
I. Yes, this will give out a clear message to builders to stop building any such new structures.
II. No, there will be people residing in such buildings.

Should we ban weed ( a plant used for drug production)?

Argument 1: Yes, as weed leads to health problems and mental instability, leading to increase in crime rates.
Argument 2: No, a good chunk of people from hilly terrains depend on weed cultivation for their economic sustenance.

Read the following passage and choose the option that cannot be said to be an implicit assumption:

The pollution level in the city has skyrocketed in the past few months. The city corporation, in an attempt to curb the pollution, has made it mandatory for all vehicles to be fitted with catalytic converters. Also, it has proposed a policy by which only vehicles of a particular parity (odd or even numbered vehicles) can be driven on a particular day.

In the question given below a statement along with three assumptions are given. An assumption is something supposed to be taken for granted. Find out which assumptions are implicit in the given statement.
Statement: Newly inducted ministers were advised to comment carefully so that public doesn’t question the abilities of the government.
Assumption:
I - Public have no trust in the government.
II - Commenting carefully will help win next elections.
III - The newly inducted ministers were inexperienced.

In each of the following questions, a statement is followed by two courses of action. A course of action is taken for redressal, follow up, etc. Read the statement carefully and choose the correct answer accordingly.
Statement: The residents of Anna colony are complaining about the menace caused by the excessive number of street dogs.

Conclusion I: The city corporation should cull the street dogs.
Conclusion II: The city corporation must neuter the street dogs and relocate them to animal shelters.

Shyam is running a start-up. His initial investments are high and he is trying hard to manage and increase his cash flow. The sundry expenses that his firm incurs is negligible. He found from his accountant that the amount of pre-paid expenses in the balance sheet,
which were booked from the previous year to the current year was increased. Shyam also ensured that his cash funded by the venture capitalists did not reduce when compared to the previous year. The interest that he gets from his fixed deposits increases, which is in tune with his sundry expenses. The final effect on cash for this year would be _____________.

LPG subsidy is a stand taken by the government. Linking of Aadhar card to a bank account has been made mandatory for receiving the subsidy.
Argument I: All people should give up LPG subsidies.
Argument II: To fill the gap between poor and rich.

In the following question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions I and II. Give answer :
Statement :
The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it.
Conclusions :
I. Your life will be dull if you don’t face problem.
II. To escape from problem, you should always have some solutions with you.

Read this question based on the information given below:
Wendy, a student, is an avid backgammon player. All students play either chess or checkers, but some checkers players do not play chess because they do not understand chess strategy. Backgammon players never play checkers, because they do not find checkers challenging. Therefore, Wendy must understand chess strategy.
Which of the following must be true for the conclusion drawn above to be logically correct?

In the following question, a statement is given followed by three assumptions numbered I, II and III. Consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit.
Statement :
India’s economic growth has come at a terrible price of increased industrial and vehicular pollution.
Assumptions :
I. Pollution is a part of industrial society.
II. Indian economic growth is based on only industrial growth.
III. A country desires economic growth with manageable side-effects.

In the following question, a statement is given followed by three assumptions numbered I, II and III. Consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit.
Statement :
“Smoking is injurious to health”-a warning printed on the cigarette packets.
Assumptions :
I. People read printed matter on the cigarette packet.
II. People take careful note of warning.
III. Non-smoking promotes health.

In 2002, according to a news poll, 36% of the voters had leaning towards party “Y”. In 2004, this figure rose to 46%. But in another survey the percentage was down to 40%. Therefore, the party “Z” is likely to win the next election. Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the above conclusion?

Inflation rose by 5% over the second quarter, by 4% during the first quarter and higher than 3% recorded during the same time last year. However, the higher price index did not seem to alarm National stock Index as stock prices remain steady.
Which of the following, if true, could explain the reaction of National stock Index?

Beautiful beaches attract people, no doubt about it. Just look at this city’s beautiful beaches, which are among the most over crowded beaches in the state. Which of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning most similar to the one exhibited in the argument above?

No national productivity measures are available for underground industries that may exist but remain unreported. On the other hand, at least some industries that are run entirely by self - employed industrialists are included in national productivity measures. From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that

Nilu has never received a violation from the Federal Aviation Administration during her 16 - year flying career. Nilu must be a great pilot.
Which of the following can be said about the reasoning above?

The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?

In the following question two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assume the two statements are true even if they are at variance with commonly known facts. Then pick the correct answer from the choices given below.
Statements: Some doctors are fools. Joshi is a doctor.
Conclusions:
I. Joshi is a fool.
II. Some fools are doctors.