XAT 2023 Question Paper

Option D is the correct answer because it aligns with the concept of a hyper-object as described in the passage. A hyper-object is characterized by extensive time-space boundaries that are challenging for humans to fully comprehend. The changing orbit of the Earth over centuries involves a broad time-scale and complex spatial dynamics, making it closer to the idea of a hyper-object compared to the other options.

Option A involves a cyclical and relatively more immediate phenomenon, not reflecting the extensive time-space boundaries associated with hyper-objects.

Option B is a more localized cause-and-effect relationship, lacking the complexity and broader scope of a hyper-object.

Option C represents a specific cause-and-effect scenario within a limited context, not meeting the criteria of a hyper-object.

Option E involves a specific and relatively more immediate technological contribution, not encompassing the extensive time-space boundaries characteristic of hyper-objects.

The passage criticizes a human-centric perspective that prioritizes human interests and exploits nature for economic growth. Option A, on the other hand, suggests an approach that values nature for its inherent intelligence, emphasizing a more intrinsic and non-exploitative perspective.Therefore Option A is the correct answer.

Option B reflects a human-centric perspective by emphasizing the utilization of natural resources for economic gain, which is in line with the passage's critique of human-centric approaches contributing to environmental degradation.

Option C is incorrect as while promoting tree planting for oxygen is environmentally positive, the statement still centers on the benefit to humans, aligning with a human-centric viewpoint.

Option D, although advocating for preservation, is still framed in terms of human interests, focusing on the well-being of future generations.

Option E , despite addressing environmental consequences, is ultimately centered around the negative impacts on humans.

Statement 1 The passage does not explicitly discuss patents, and there is no clear indication of the author's view on this matter. Without information on the author's stance, it cannot be concluded whether this statement is in consonance with the author's views or not.

Statement 2 The passage criticises the flaws in the current economic model, particularly the capitalist ethos of free-market trading, suggesting that it contributes to environmental problems. Therefore, this statement is not in line with the author’s views either.

Statement 3: This is also not in line with the author’s views as the passage implies a critique of human-centric activities that exploit nature for economic gain, and building a resort on a hilltop could be seen as an example of such exploitation.

Therefore the correct answer is Option C : 1,2 and 3

Option D is the correct answer because the passage does not attribute bad storytelling in a society to its lack of inclusivity. The passage highlights issues with existing stories, such as their inability to create a positive future image, their divisiveness leading to bickering, and their outdated nature. However, the concept of inclusivity is not explicitly linked to the problems associated with bad storytelling. Instead, the passage emphasizes the need for a new, unifying narrative to address societal challenges and inspire collaborative efforts. Therefore, the absence of inclusivity as a problem aligns with the passage's context and makes Option D the correct choice.

Options A, B, C and D have been mentioned in the passage and hence can be associated with bad storytelling.

Option A is the correct answer as it captures the essence of a good story by emphasizing the theme of universal interconnectedness. A compelling narrative often transcends individual perspectives, fostering a sense of unity and shared experience among diverse individuals. This option implies a broader, inclusive worldview, aligning with the idea that a good story should resonate with the common humanity that connects everyone, highlighting the interconnected nature of individuals and the universe. It reflects a positive and unifying theme, which is a characteristic often associated with powerful and impactful storytelling.

Option B emphasizes a national perspective, which might not resonate universally and could be seen as exclusive rather than inclusive.

Option C focuses on a specific event and its consequences, lacking the universal and inclusive nature often associated with a broader, impactful narrative.

Option D eans towards a pessimistic perspective, lacking the uplifting and unifying qualities typically associated with a good story.

Option E highlights a specific historical aspect, but its emphasis on a national achievement may not encompass a universally resonant theme, potentially excluding a global audience.

Statement 3 aligns with the concept of an "unreasonable story" because an unreasonable story may prioritize emotional or symbolic truth over strict factual accuracy. It suggests a departure from conventional or rational narratives, allowing for creative or unconventional interpretations that might not strictly adhere to factual details.

Statement 4 is associated with an "unreasonable story" as the passage calls for a new, unreasonable narrative that inspires and unites humanity. An unreasonable story, in this context, goes beyond conventional or predictable narratives and seeks to be compelling in a way that motivates positive action and fosters a sense of shared purpose among diverse individuals.

Therefore the correct answer is Option E: 3&4

Option-E

This option ensures that the new faculty (A type candidates) not only maintains the quality of education in existing courses but also contributes to updating the course content by developing complementary courses. It strikes a balance between leveraging the expertise of the existing faculty and bringing in fresh perspectives to adapt to the changing business landscape.

Option-A

This option focuses on diversity in teaching styles but doesn't explicitly address the need for developing complementary courses.

Option-B

This option assumes that the existing faculty can develop complementary courses, but it might be challenging for them to manage this alone, especially considering their existing teaching responsibilities.

Option-C

Hiring candidates solely because they are willing to teach any course may compromise the quality of education. The focus should be on recruiting individuals who are both good teachers and capable of contributing to course development.

Option-D

While hiring A type candidates is a good idea, doing so unconditionally without ensuring their contribution to developing complementary courses may not fully address the challenge of adapting to the changing global business scenario.

Therefore, E is the best choice.

The correct option is A because it focuses on complementary courses, reducing direct competition and fostering collaboration between new and existing faculty members. It strikes a balance between maintaining the strengths of the current faculty and introducing innovation through new hires, thereby minimizing conflicts and politicking.

Option B is not correct because they are described as not-so-good teachers. Allowing them to teach all types of courses may compromise the overall quality of education, potentially leading to dissatisfaction among students and conflicts within the faculty.

Option C is not the most suitable option because while it maintains the excellence of existing courses by assigning A type candidates to teach them. However, it may face resistance from existing faculty members who might not be comfortable or interested in teaching new courses. This approach may lead to conflicts and challenges in implementing changes smoothly.

Option D is not correct because it creates a scenario where new A type candidates and existing faculty members are offering the same courses. This can potentially lead to conflicts and political maneuvering as faculty members compete for teaching assignments and student attention. The direct competition may hinder collaboration and harmony among the faculty.

Option E is incorrect B type candidates are described as average teachers but competent in creating and teaching new courses that complement existing ones. Allowing them to teach all kinds of courses, including existing ones, might not leverage their strengths effectively, potentially leading to a compromise in the quality of education for existing courses.

Option E is the most efficient choice by combining the teaching excellence of A type candidates with their capability to develop complementary courses, ensuring a well-rounded and resource-efficient approach.

Option A is incorrect because it may result in redundancy, as both new A type candidates and existing faculty members would be teaching the same courses. It can lead to inefficient resource allocation and potential competition for teaching assignments.

Option B is not the most efficient because B type candidates are average teachers but competent in creating and teaching new courses. Hiring them exclusively for complementary courses might not efficiently utilize their skills in teaching existing courses.

Option C is not the correct answer because the existing faculty members may not have the expertise or inclination to develop complementary courses. This approach might lead to inefficiencies in course development and potentially compromise the quality of new courses.

Option D is incorrect because C type candidates, described as not-so-good teachers, may not be the best fit for teaching-assistant responsibilities. This option may result in challenges in maintaining teaching quality and efficient utilization of faculty resources.

The correct option is E

The correct option is A because the success of the food center heavily relies on having sufficient funds to cover the costs of ingredients, salaries, operations, and maintenance. Without an adequate financial foundation, WBLCF may struggle to continue its philanthropic work and expand to nearby districts. Paying salaries, attracting diners, having enough cooks, and offering local dishes are all interconnected challenges that can be addressed more effectively with a robust financial base.

Option B is not the most critical because while paying salaries is crucial for retaining dedicated employees, it is a component of the overall financial challenge. If there are not enough finances to cover salaries, it becomes a subset of the broader issue of obtaining adequate funds and donations.

Option C is not the most critical one because while attracting diners is essential for the success of the food center, but it's not the primary challenge. Even if there are many diners, the initiative's sustainability depends on having the necessary financial resources to continue providing free meals.

Option D is not correct because having enough cooks and employees is an operational challenge but can be addressed within the broader context of financial stability. If there are sufficient funds, hiring and retaining staff becomes more manageable.

Option E is not crucial because while offering variety in the menu may be a desire expressed by diners, it is not as critical as ensuring the financial sustainability of the food center. Menu diversification can be considered once the core financial challenges are addressed.

The correct option is A