SNAP 2022 Question Paper

The ‘jurisprudence’ has been misspelt in the part d of the sentence. 'Jurisprudence' means rules, regulation or legislation. In the given context, the author is trying to imply that Greeks were so good in other fields that it made it difficult to believe that they were inferior to romans in legislations. Hence option A is the correct answer.

The phrase "De Facto" means "in fact".

It has its origins in the Latin language.

The answer is option C.

‘Take time off’ means to take a break. Also, only ‘take’ is grammatically correct in the sentence. Option D) is the correct answer.

The preposition which fits the given context is ‘under’. ‘Having’ is grammatically incorrect which ‘in’, ‘on’ and ‘over’ are wrong usages of the prepositions. Hence, option C is the correct answer.

The correct word to be filled will be “to driving” as the continuous form of the verb is used with “used to”. Hence, the correct option is A

Based on the given statements we cannot assume that public has no trust in government. Also, we cannot assume whether commenting carefully helps in winning elections. Further experience level of the ministers also cannot be assumed. Thus all the three assumptions are not implicit.
Thus, D is the correct choice.

From the given statement we cannot infer the success of Navi Mumbai in reducing the congestion in Mumbai. Thus, statement I cannot be inferred.
We also do not have any data form the given statement comparing the current population of Mumbai and Navi Mumbai. Thus, statement II also cannot be inferred.

Since Ramesh got a promotion, he is throwing a party to his friends. So, 2 is the cause and 1 is the effect.

In this scenario, it can be inferred that the increase in electricity bills for households (Statement I) is caused by the government raising the tariffs for electricity consumption by 10% (Statement II). When the government increases the tariffs, the cost of electricity per unit consumed by households goes up. As a result, the electricity providers charge higher rates to the consumers, leading to an increase in electricity bills.

Thus, Statement I (increase in electricity bills) is the effect, and Statement II (government raising the tariffs) is the cause of this effect. Therefore, the correct answer is Option B.

On the orders of the high court, the ECI has directed the parties to stop using public funds for propagating party symbol.
This does not mean that all parties used to practice this. Hence statement I is not a valid inference.
The ECI has directed the parties to follow this. However from the given amount of information, we do not know if this is binding on the parties or not. Hence inference II is also not valid.
There is no mention of the voters in the given statement. There might be other reasons due to which the court might has ordered parties not to use public funds for propagating their symbols.
Hence inference III is also not valid.