SNAP Verbal Reasoning questions

Four friends 1, 2, 3 and 4 are arguing on who is right in stating an English proverb.
1. states that the correct proverb is "A swarm in May is worth a load of hay; a swarm in June is worth a full moon; but a swarm in July is not worth a fly."
2. states that the proverb is "A swarm in May is worth a load of hay; a swarm in June is worth a looney toon; but a swarm in July is not worth a fly."
3. states the proverb as "A swarm in May is worth a load of hay; a swarm in June is worth a silver spoon ; but a swarm in July is not worth a fly."
4. states that the proverb actually is "A swarm in May is worth a load of hay; a swarm in June is worth a golden boon; but a swarm in July is not worth a fly."
Who is correct in stating the proverb?
(Note:- DO NOT include spaces in your answer)

Given Statement: The new amendment of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India refers to bringing an overall positive impact on the communities, cultures, societies and environments. The fundamentals of CSR rest on the fact that not only public policy but even corporate should be responsible enough to address social issues.

Argument I: Government should not enforce companies to take up CSR.
Argument II: Companies moral responsibility is to take up CSR for a long run benefit.

An ingredient in coffee, known as RTC, has been found to inactivate common cold viruses in experiments. In previous experiments, researchers found that inactivated common cold viruses can convert healthy cells into cancer cells. It can be concluded that the use of coffee can cause cancer. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?