Group
SNAP 2025 Test 2 Exam Analysis
The SNAP 2025 Test 2 exam, conducted on 14th December 2025, was broadly in line with the SNAP pattern: speed-based and student-friendly. Most expert reports described Test 2 as Easy–Moderate, though some noted that certain reasoning and Quant sets were longer/lengthier than Test 1. Overall, accuracy plus speed remained the key to scoring well.
Below is the complete SNAP 2025 Test 2 analysis, followed by section-wise difficulty, a detailed topic-wise breakdown, good attempts, and previous-year cutoff context.
Also Read, SNAP Exam Analysis 2025, Difficulty Level, Good Attempts
SNAP 2025 Test 2 Section-wise Difficulty Level
SNAP 2025 Test 2 was generally reported as Easy–Moderate. English and Reasoning continued to be the faster scoring sections for many test-takers, while Quants had a few lengthy/calculation-heavy questions that required more time. Overall, test-takers with good speed and selection strategy could attempt around 50+ questions.
Section | Difficulty Level | Key Highlights |
General English | Easy- Moderate | Short questions; vocabulary & grammar heavy |
Analytical & Logical Reasoning | Easy–Moderate | Mix of straightforward and a few lengthy puzzles |
Quantitative Aptitude + DI/DS | Moderate | Some time-consuming calculation based sets |
Overall Difficulty | Easy–Moderate | Balanced paper with scoring opportunities |
SNAP 2025 Test 2 Section-wise Exam Analysis
Test 2 followed the usual SNAP format and was overall easy to moderate. English and Reasoning offered quick scoring chances, while Quant required selective attempts because of a few lengthier questions. Most questions were concept-based and direct, with occasional time-taking sets.
SNAP General English Exam Analysis (Test 2)
The General English section in Test 2 was easy to moderate, containing short and direct items fillers, vocabulary, grammar and a couple of jumbles. There were no long RCs in the majority of reports, so this section remained the fastest scoring one.
Overall: Approximately 12 out of 15 questions were reported as doable.
Topic-wise Breakdown
S. No. | Topic / Area | No. of Questions | Difficulty | Doable |
1 | Sentence Jumble | 1 | Easy | 1 |
2 | Idiom | 1 | Moderate | 1 |
3 | Fillers | 8 | Easy–Moderate | 6 |
4 | Contextual Vocabulary | 1 | Easy | 1 |
5 | Parts of Speech | 1 | Easy | 1 |
6 | Figure of Speech | 1 | Moderate | 1 |
7 | Passive Voice | 2 | Moderate | 1 |
Total | – | 15 | Easy–Moderate | 12 |
SNAP Analytical & Logical Reasoning Exam Analysis (Test 2)
The LR section in Test 2 had a mix of short, scoring questions and a few moderate puzzles that took time. Areas like syllogisms, arrangement, clocks & calendars, and logical reasoning dominated. Some test-takers found a couple of sets longer than Test 1.
Overall: Around 19–20 out of 25 questions were comfortably doable according to memory-based reports.
Topic-wise Breakdown
S. No. | Topic / Area | No. of Questions | Difficulty | Doable |
1 | Course of Action | 2 | Easy | 2 |
2 | Cause & Effect | 2 | Easy | 2 |
3 | Analogy | 1 | Easy | 1 |
4 | Syllogism | 2 | Easy | 2 |
5 | Statement–Assumption | 3 | Easy | 2 |
6 | Series | 2 | Easy–Moderate | 1 |
7 | Blood Relation | 2 | Easy–Moderate | 1 |
8 | GK (Logic-based) | 2 | Easy | 2 |
9 | Numeric Series | 1 | Easy | 1 |
10 | Linear Arrangement | 2 | Easy–Moderate | 1 |
11 | Coding–Decoding | 2 | Easy | 1 |
12 | Calendar | 1 | Easy | 1 |
13 | Clocks | 2 | Easy | 2 |
14 | Decision Making | 1 | Easy | 1 |
Total | – | 25 | Easy–Moderate | 19–20 |
SNAP QA, DI & DS Exam Analysis (Test 2)
The QA + DI/DS section had some straightforward arithmetic and algebra questions but included a few lengthy DI sets and calculation-heavy problems. Candidates who selected questions wisely and used shortcuts did well.
Overall: Roughly 15–16 out of 20 questions were reported doable in Test 2
Topic-wise Breakdown
S. No. | Topic / Area | No. of Questions | Difficulty | Doable |
1 | Permutation & Combination | 2 | Easy | 2 |
2 | Logarithms | 2 | Easy | 1 |
3 | SI & CI | 1 | Moderate | 1 |
4 | Coordinate Geometry | 2 | Easy | 1 |
5 | Set Theory | 1 | Moderate | 1 |
6 | Average | 1 | Easy | 1 |
7 | Series | 2 | Easy | 1 |
8 | Time, Speed & Distance | 2 | Easy | 2 |
9 | Profit & Loss | 2 | Easy | 1 |
10 | Trigonometry | 1 | Easy | 1 |
11 | Remainder | 1 | Easy | 1 |
12 | Area | 2 | Easy | 2 |
13 | Percentage | 1 | Easy | 1 |
Total | – | 20 | Easy–Moderate | 15–16 |
(Topic spread follows competitor breakdowns for Test 2.)
SNAP 2025 Test 2: Good Attempts & Scores
Experts and coaching institutes published expected score vs percentile tables after Test 2. Based on those, Test 2 good attempts and indicative scores are:
Category | Attempts / Score (Indicative) |
Good Attempts | 45-50 |
Good Score Range | 40+ |
99+ Percentile (approx.) | 42+ |
99.5+ Percentile (approx.) | 44+ |
SNAP Previous Year Cut off for Top MBA Colleges
For context, previous SNAP year cutoffs for leading Symbiosis institutes remain similar to earlier reports and provide a benchmark for expected calls:
Institute | SNAP 2024 Percentile |
SIBM Pune | 99+ |
SCMHRD Pune | 98+ |
SIBM Bangalore | 95+ |
SIIB Pune | 85+ |
SIDTM Pune | 80+ |
SIMS Pune | 75+ |
(These are unchanged comparative benchmarks aspirants use while estimating calls.)
SNAP Test 2 Exam Analysis 2025: Conclusion
- Test 2 was largely student-friendly but had a few lengthy sets in Reasoning and Quant that required time management.
- Prioritise English and short Reasoning sets to secure quick marks; attempt selective Quant/DI sets for accuracy
- Expected good attempts are in the ~45-50 range; 42+ generally fetches 99+ percentile in most mappings.
