Effect: At least twenty school children were seriously injured while going for a school picnic during the weekend.
Which of the following can be a probable cause of the above effect?
SNAP Critical Reasoning Questions
SNAP Critical Reasoning Questions
Most of the school children were injured while going for a picnic. So, for the effect reason may be either they met with an accident or any food poison from the given option the bus in which the children were travelling met with an accident while taking turn on the main highway is the reasonable cause.
In the following question, two statements numbered I and II are given. There may be cause and effect relationship between the two statements. These two statements may be the effect of the same cause or independent causes. These statements may be independent causes without having any relationship.
I. The country has seen no major breakthrough in medical research in the past few years.
II. The government, two years back, had banned patents and royalties on medicines.
Since there are no patents and royalties on medicines, the people who pursue medical research have no incentive in bringing out new medicines.
Option B is the correct answer.
In the question below, a statement is given followed by two arguments. Choose the most appropriate option.
Statement: Companies serious about more harmonious relationships with the contractual workforce should offer them a pathway to up-skill and be employed as permanent workers over time.
Argument:
I) Building a good relationship with the contractual workforce will help both the companies and the employees to progress.
II) The policy of offering contractual workers permanent status is likely to face opposition from existing permanent staff.
The statement expresses support for converting contractual workers into permanent staff. Argument I strengthens this by pointing out that both the company and the employee will benefit from this. Argument II weakens the statement by highlighting a fallout / hurdle in implementing the policy.
In the given questions below, few statements are given and are followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Statement : A large number of people from city X are admitted in hospitals and are diagnosed to be suffering from malaria.
Courses of action :
I. The municipal authority of the city X should take immediate steps to carry out extensive fumigation.
II. City X should be vacated immediately.
Fumigation of city X will bring the mosquito population under control and help address the malaria epidemic. Hence I is a reasonable course of action.
Action II of vacating the city is extreme and impractical. Hence, option A.
A statement is given followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement to be true even if it is at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the assumptions, if any, follow from the given statement.
Statement: After the Reserve Bank of India’s adoption of a flexible inflation-targeting framework from August 2016, the rules of monetary policy have changed in India, with the central bank becoming even more focused on anchoring inflation and inflation expectations than ever before.
Assumptions:
I. There was a perceived need or rationale for the RBI to shift its monetary policy framework in 2016, suggesting that the previous rules may have been inadequate.
II. Monetary policy can be adjusted and adapted to changing economic conditions and goals, such as inflation targeting.
Both of the assumptions are necessary for the statement to make sense:
Assumption I talks about the RBI's adoption of a flexible inflation-targeting framework in 2016 - the implication here is that there was a reason or need for this shift, indicating that the previous rules or framework may not have been sufficient in achieving the central bank's objectives.
Assumption II is also necessary because the statement discusses how the rules of monetary policy have changed, indicating that monetary policy can indeed be adjusted and adapted to meet different economic conditions and goals. Without this assumption, the idea of a shift in monetary policy would not be meaningful, as it would imply that policy cannot change to respond to evolving circumstances.
The question given below consists of some statements. You need to decide which of the statements is/are the cause of the situation or effect of the situation and accordingly choose your answer from the alternative given below each question.
Statements :
I. A new covid variant named ‘Omicron’ is spreading rapidly in the country. Lots of new cases are being reported in a short period of time.
II. The central government is in a dilemma on whether to proceed with a lockdown or not.
The central government is thinking about the lockdown because of the spread of the new covid variant ‘Omicron’. So Statement I is the cause and Statement II is its effect.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B