SNAP 2010

The sales of Voveran in 2006 = 23 Crore

The sales of Calpol in 2005 = 13 Crore

Difference= 10 Crore

i.e 1000 lakhs

Percentage of increase in sales from 2005 to 2006:

Voveran: (23-16)/16= 43.75

Volini: (9.5-6.5)/6.5=46.15

Dolonex:(10-6)/6= 66.66

Sumo:(7-5)/5=40

Option C is correct.

Percentage of increase in sales from 2005 to 2006:

Voveran: (23-16)/16= 43.75%

Volini: (9.5-6.5)/6.5=46.15%

Moov: 1/4= 25%

Nise: (18-15)/15=20%

Option D 

Percentage of increase in sales from 2005 to 2006:

Voveran: (23-16.5)/16.5= 39.39%  ..(nearly) 40%

Option B

Option A is correct,

In the centre region, the dots and stripes are alternating, thus the centre will now be "dots".

Hexagon and circles will alternate in twos.

one-tenth of 400 = 40

one-quarter of 40 = 10

one half of 10 = 5

Option B

We can make the following figure from the information given in the question: 

Suppose the side of the square ABCD = 2a

Angle HAP= 30$$^{\circ\ }$$

HA= a

HP=$$\frac{a}{\sqrt{\ 3}}$$

Area HAP = $$\frac{a^2}{2\sqrt{\ 3}}$$

Remaining Area = 4* $$\frac{a^2}{2\sqrt{\ 3}}$$

Area of the shaded region= 4a$$^2$$ - 4* $$\frac{a^2}{2\sqrt{\ 3}}$$

Ratio= Shaded/ Remaining = 2$$\sqrt{\ 3}$$-1

The price of Darjeeling Tea (in rupees per kilogram) is 100 + 0.1n till 100th day and remains constant

The price of Ooty tea (in rupees per kilogram) is 85 + 0.15n

Price of Darjeeling tea on 100th day = 100 + 0.1(100) = 110

Price of Ooty tea on 100th day = 85 + 0.15(100) = 100

Their prices are not equal

Therefore, 110 = 85 + 0.15n

                      n = $$\frac{500}{3}$$ = 166.67

Price will be equal on 167th day

January(31) + February(28) + March(31) + April(30) + May(31) = 151 days

June 16th is 167th day.

Answer is option B

Statement I:

If area of triangle ABC and PQR are equal, we cannot infer that they are congruent. Hence, statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement II:

If both triangles ABC and PQR are right angled triangles, we cannot say whether they are congruent or not. Hence, statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Considering both the statements, we do not have any condition regarding sides or angles of triangles. Therefore, statement I and statement II together are not sufficient to answer the question.

Let salary of A be 3x and salary of B be 4x
Let expenditure of A be 4y and B be 5y 
Now Statement 1 says B save 25% of his salary
So savings of B = x
Now we can say : x= 4x-5y ( As Savings = Income - Expenditure )
we get : 3x =5y
y = 3x/5 Now Therefore savings of A : 3x-4y = 3x- 4(3x/5)
And then we can calculate ratio of savings .
So statement 1 alone is sufficient .
Now Statement 2 says
B's salary is 2500
Now as we do not know anything about expenditure of B so we cannot calculate savings of B and henceforth savings of A
so Statement 2 alone is not sufficient