MAH MBA CET Sample Paper 2026

We know each friend obtained a different score in each round and each friend has a unique score in each round.

The scores are from 1 to 5.

Sum of 1 to 5 = 1+2+3+4+5 = 15

That means if we look at the total score of round 1 to round 4, the score not obtained in any round by any friend will be 15-total score.

For Abhay = 15-12 = 3 (Abhay didn't received a score of 3 in any round).

Similarly, for Bharat, Chandan, Deepak and Ganesh, the scores not obtained in any round are 4,5,2 and 1, respectively.

Now filling the table-

For Ganesh, total = 14

We know round 1+ round 2 = 9, so round 3+round 4 = 5 and scores will be 2 and 3.

Since Bharat has scored 2 in round 3, Ganesh will score 3 in round 3, thus he scores 2 in round 4.

Chandan has either received a score of 4 in round 1 or round 3. But, in round 1, Ganesh has scored 4, so Chandan scored 4 in round 3 and scored 1 in round 1.

There are 2 cases possible.

We know each friend obtained a different score in each round and each friend has a unique score in each round.

The scores are from 1 to 5.

Sum of 1 to 5 = 1+2+3+4+5 = 15

That means if we look at the total score of round 1 to round 4, the score not obtained in any round by any friend will be 15-total score.

For Abhay = 15-12 = 3 (Abhay didn't received a score of 3 in any round).

Similarly, for Bharat, Chandan, Deepak and Ganesh, the scores not obtained in any round are 4,5,2 and 1, respectively.

Now filling the table-

For Ganesh, total = 14

We know round 1+ round 2 = 9, so round 3+round 4 = 5 and scores will be 2 and 3.

Since Bharat has scored 2 in round 3, Ganesh will score 3 in round 3, thus he scores 2 in round 4.

Chandan has either received a score of 4 in round 1 or round 3. But, in round 1, Ganesh has scored 4, so Chandan scored 4 in round 3 and scored 1 in round 1.

There are 2 cases possible.

Deepak did not receive a score of 2 in any round.

Rushi's actions can be traced into the following diagram, 

To find the distance between the starting and the final point we can basically sketch out the right-angle triangle involved. 
We know that the ending point is 40 feet away horizontally and 30 feet away vertically. 

Hence the distance between the starting and the camping point is 50 feet. 

Rushi's actions can be traced into the following diagram,

From the camped spot to the point where he discovered magic mushrooms it is a right-angled triangle with sides 40 and 20. 
Distance would be: $$\sqrt{1600+400}=20\sqrt{5}$$
Which approximately is: 44.72, nearest integer is 45. 

1. Starting Direction: Ravi begins facing North.
2. First Movement: He walks 8 meters straight (still facing North).
3. First Turn: He takes a left turn, so now he faces West. He walks 6 meters.
4. Second Turn: He takes another left turn, so now he faces South. He walks 10 meters.
5. Third Turn: He takes a right turn, so now he faces West. He walks 4 meters.
6. Fourth Turn: He takes another right turn, so now he faces North. He walks 6 meters.
7. Final Turn: He takes a left turn, so now he faces West. He walks 2 meters.
After the entire journey, Ravi is facing West.

The final point is 40 m south and 9m west to the starting point.

So, the distance between the two points is $$\sqrt{9^2+40^2}=41m$$

Hence the answer is 41m, south-west.

Let's assume that he moves s meters every 30 minutes. 

So he first travels 2s meters to the north, then turns left, facing west and walks s meters in that direction, after which he turns 90 degrees clockwise, now facing north again and walks s meter again. 

Then turns 90 degree clockwise yet again, facing east and walks 2s meters, and then turns towards south and walks 2s meters in that direction. 

So, he is essentially s meters north and s meters east of his original position. 

So he is $$s\sqrt{\ 2}$$ m away from the starting point. 

This would take him approximately $$30\times\ \sqrt{\ 2}\approx\ 30\times\ 1.41\approx\ 42$$ minutes. 

Therefore, Option B is the correct answer. 

The correct assumption underlying the fitness trainer's conclusion is Option D, "The study's results are reliable and accurately represent the relationship between exercise and stress."

This is because the trainer's conclusion that regular exercise directly reduces stress levels depends on the assumption that the study's findings are valid and correctly reflect a cause-and-effect relationship between exercise and stress. Without trusting the reliability of the study, the conclusion cannot hold.

Option A suggests reverse causation (that people with lower stress levels are more likely to exercise), which goes against the trainer’s claim that exercise reduces stress.

Option B focuses on exercise being the primary factor for stress reduction, but it doesn’t address the underlying assumption that the study itself is valid.

Option C implies that no other factors contribute to stress reduction, which is unnecessary for the trainer’s conclusion. The trainer only needs to assume that exercise plays a significant role.

Option E adds a detail about the timeframe for stress reduction, but the trainer’s conclusion isn’t dependent on whether the effect is short- or long-term.

The trainer’s conclusion rests on the belief that the study is trustworthy and accurately captures the link between exercise and stress, which makes Option D the best choice.

Option D accurately reflects the passage's main argument: the success of bike-sharing programs depends on supporting infrastructure like bike lanes and safe parking. This infrastructure enables these programs to effectively reduce traffic congestion and pollution, creating a clear cause-and-effect relationship. Without adequate infrastructure, the programs struggle to achieve their goals, as stated in the passage.

Option A: Incorrect. The passage does not claim that bike-sharing programs reduce traffic in all cities. It specifies that success depends on infrastructure.

Option B: Incorrect. While infrastructure is necessary, the passage does not claim it guarantees success in all cities.

Option C: Incorrect. The passage focuses on the effects of bike-sharing programs, not general preferences for alternative transportation.

Option E: Incorrect. The passage clearly states that reduced carbon emissions depend on the success of bike-sharing programs, not their mere presence.

Hence, the correct answer is Option D

Option B is correct: The paragraph indicates a correlation between Bitcoin's rising value and increased institutional interest. It is reasonable to conclude that Bitcoin's high value has contributed to its perception as a viable asset class for institutional investors like pension funds. This is a direct and logical inference from the text.

Option A: Is out of the context of the paragraph that is given, it does not talk about regulation at all. 
Option C: The passage states that the pension fund have invested in cryptocurrency, does not talk about exclusivity at all
Optin D: Bitcoin passing 100k is mentioned along with the pension funds securing investments. It is not given that it is a direct result of it. 
Option E: This option also is an overreach, there is no mention of complete replacement.