MAH MBA CET Sample Paper 2026

All the numbers except 36 are thrice of a prime number.
i.e. 11*3, 2*3, 17*3, 29*3

However, 36 is a composite number multiplied with 3.

CFLX = 3 6 12 24

ABDH = 1 2 4 8

EJTN = 5 10 20 40(40%26 = 14) 

BDHP = 2 4 8 16

GNBE = 7 14 28(%26 = 2) 56(%26 = 4)

7 14 2 4 = GNBD

So, this is incorrect.

We will get the equation: 0+I+II+III<100
We know that II is 50, III is 15, and the 0 and I are equal, giving us the inequality:

2 I<35
I< 17.5

Therefore, a maximum of 17 students could have applied for exactly one sport. 

Hence, Option B is the correct answer. 

Let us assume total students in school = 100%

two-fifth of the students own a mobile phone = 2/5*100 = 40% have mobile phone

four-fifth own a laptop = 4/5*100 = 80% have laptops

20% own both.

So, students with only mobile = 40%-20% = 20%

Students with only laptop = 80%-20% = 60%

Hence, the percentage of students who own only one of the two (either a mobile phone or a laptop) = 20+60 = 80%

Given that there are 350 students in the class and 50 students don't have either drink.

So, 300 students have either tea or coffee or both.

Given 80 students drink both tea and coffee, while 170 students drink coffee

So, the number of students who drink only coffee is 170-80 = 90.

Assuming that the number of students who drink only tea is $$x$$.

So, $$x+80+90=300$$

or, $$x=130$$

Hence, the number of students who drink tea = only tea + both tea and coffee = 130 + 80 = 210

Hence, the answer is 210.

Let: 
x = number of students playing exactly one sport

y = number of students playing exactly two sports

z = number of students playing all three sports

We are given, z=y and x=2z

We know that, x+y+z=100
(2z)+(z)+(z)=100

z=25

Number of registrations will be, 
x+2y+3z
2z+2z+3z=7z

7z=175

1. Contradiction
2. Contradict
3. Contract
4. Contrive
5. Contribute

Here, we need to look after "Contr" for each word as "Contr" is common to all.

So, we have: adiction, adict, act, ive, ibute

Arranging them in the order, we get: act, adict, adiction, ibute, ive

Hence, the correct order is 3, 2, 1, 5, 4

Option 1: Fashioned
Option 2: Fastidious
Option 3: Fascinate
Option 4: Fascism
Option 5: Fasten

We have "Fas" common in all the words. So, the remaining part of the words are:

hioned, tidious, cinate, cism, ten

Arranging them alphabetically, we get:
cinate, cism, hioned, ten, tidious

Hence, the fourth word will be Fasten

The key in data sufficiency questions is to determine whether the answer is fixed; we need not find the answer itself, but eliminate if there are other possibilities.

Before considering the statements we know that $$2(l+b)$$ equals 30, hence $$l+b$$ equals 15 cm

The rectangle R could be of multiple forms, so we might not be able to find the exact triangle; hence, the maximum area can not be uniquely determined. 

Let's consider statement 1:

It give us the information that $$lb$$ equals 54, along with $$l+b$$ equals 15, which would give us a quadratic equation, which can be used to find the values of both $$l$$ and $$b$$
Can we determine the triangle's maximum area once we know the exact side lengths of the triangle?
We can see that in order for the triangle to be of maximum length, we would want the side length to be maximum. Since that can be difficult to do, we can also try to maximize the base and height of the triangle. We can take the side length such that the base can be placed on the longer side, and the height would be equal to the smaller side of the rectangle. This would give us the maximum area possible. 

Hence, Statement 1 alone is sufficient. 

Let's consider statement 2:

This gives us $$l^2+b^2=117$$; this, along with the value of $$l+b$$ we have before considering the statements, which can also be used to uniquely determine the dimensions of the rectangle. 

After this, the same process would follow as we did for statement 1

Hence, Statement 2 alone is also sufficient. 

Therefore, Option B is the correct answer. 

Statement 1: It is given that Kunal is 25 years younger than Manoj, but we do not know the year in which Manoj was born. So, the year cannot be determined using Statement 1.

Statement 2: There is no information given in statement 2 about Kunal. So, we cannot determine the year Kunal was born.

Using statement 2, we can calculate the year in which Manoj was born as 1975 + 14 = 1989, and using statement 1, we can calculate the year in which Kunal was born. It can be calculated as 1989 + 25 = 2014.

So, using both statements, we can calculate the year in which Kunal was born.

Hence, the correct answer is option D.