In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement : Should cameras be installed in public school class-rooms to monitor teachers?
Argument I : No, This will violate privacy norms.
Argument II : Yes, This will make teachers more accountable, increasing their productivity.
Cameras should be installed in public school class-rooms to monitor teachers.
It is sure that this will make teachers more accountable, increasing their productivity and this does not violate any privacy norms.
$$\therefore$$ Only argument II is strong.
Create a FREE account and get: