Statement A has a misplaced modifier and should be “The girl in the yellow dress entered the taxi”. Statement B is grammatically correct. Statement C has a dangling modifier and requires a human subject to accept the temptation of the chocolate cake. Hence the sentence should be something like “Tempted by the chocolate cake, he forgot and discarded his diet plan.”

'User experience' would be 'enhanced' and not 'increased' by an improvement. In the sentence provided, "its" would be used. [It is used as a possessive pronoun here, referring to something belonging to Cracku. The sentence says that the user experience of Cracku has been enhanced.]

"It's" is a contraction of "it is" or "it has." For example, "It's raining outside" or "It's been a long day." However, in the sentence, "its" is a possessive pronoun, like "his" or "hers." [For example, "The company is proud of its achievements over the past year." or "The city is known for its beautiful architecture and rich history."] 

Hence, the correct answer is option C.

a) is wrong because it tends to talk about the player and not about the reputation. b)is wrong because it doesn’t use a conjunction to connect the statements. Also, the word again is redundant. c) is the correct option. d) is wrong because, like a) it talks about the player and not about the reputation. Also, grammar is inconsistent. Hence, option c) is the correct choice.

In option C, as the subject is plural, the verb should also be plural. Thus the verb should be “were helping . . . “.

The idiom "to speak of the devil" is used when someone we just spoke about suddenly turns up. The idiom does not fit the context of sentence three. The idiom "to add insult to injury" which means to make a situation worse, suits the context better. Get your ducks in row means to organize your tasks and schedule so that you are ready for the next step. It is correctly used in sentence I. Think on your feet means to think and react quickly. It is also used correctly. So, the answer is A.

The male equivalent of widow is widower. There is no English term called widowee. So, the correct sentence is 'The federal law that makes homosexuality a crime has its origins in legislation that was passed during the 1880s and that was firmly rooted in prejudices against young widows and widowers, who were associated with being homosexual at the time.'

The correct usage of word should be “Her remark stopped me dead in my tracks.”

a) is wrong because it tends to talk about the player and not about the reputation. b)is wrong because it doesn’t use a conjunction to connect the statements. Also, the word again is redundant. c) is the correct option. d) is wrong because, like a) it talks about the player and not about the reputation. Also, grammar is inconsistent. Hence, option c) is the correct choice.

Statement A has a misplaced modifier and should be “The girl in the yellow dress entered the taxi”. Statement B is grammatically correct. Statement C has a dangling modifier and requires a human subject to accept the temptation of the chocolate cake. Hence the sentence should be something like “Tempted by the chocolate cake, he forgot and discarded his diet plan.”

The phrase 'textile company' should be preceded by an article, in this case 'a'. So, the correct paragraph would read 'Dhirubhai Ambani returned from Yemen to India in the 1950s to start a textile company called Reliance Industries. It grew multifold over the years and went on to become independent India's largest company.'

The usage in option D is incorrect. The correct usage should be “After a few days of rest, you'll be right as rain again.”

As we are talking about journalists in general who exhibit a trait we cannot use the restrictive relative clause ‘that’. Hence, option D is incorrect. In statements A and B, the term ‘it’ is missing. Hence, option C.

Sentences A and C are grammatically correct. In neither nor, the verb should be consistent with the number of the nearer subject, which in this case is the coach. In case of none, plural verb forms are acceptable in cases where the subject can be expressed by the phrase “none of them” as in this case. The clause does not affect the number of the subject (which is “the prime minister” in this case) and hence the verb should have been singular.

As China is a singular noun, the appropriate verb to use is “it is” i.e. it’s. Since can be used as a conjunction when we are referring to a point in time and not a cause/reason. Hence, in this case we should use because as the conjunction.

A person is complimented 'on' his/her good work. Hence, the correct sentence is 'Rajiv's hard work bore fruit and all his bosses complimented him on his good work.'

In option C, as the subject is plural, the verb should also be plural. Thus the verb should be “were helping . . . “.