In each of the questions given below two/three statements followed by two Conclusions numbered I and II have been given. You have to take the two/ three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given Conelusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
a: if only Conclusion II follows
b: if only Conclusion I follows
c: if both the Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow
d: if either Conclusion I or Conclusion II follows
e: if neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows
Statements:
Some strikes are hits.
No strike is a raid.
All attacks are raids.
Conclusions :
I. Some hits are definitely not raids.
II. All hits being strikes is a possibility.
As some hits are strikes and no strike is a raid, some hits are definitely not raids. Hence, conclusion I follows.
As the extent of overlap between hits and strikes is not known, conclusion II follows. Hence, both conclusions follow.
Create a FREE account and get:
