Instructions

Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.

Comprehension:
Ned Flanders and Homer Simpson Partners Limited is a law firm, known for its unwavering commitment to client satisfaction. They treat the clients as family members who have grown along with the firm. Further, they are highly regarded in the industry, consulted by the country’s top organizations. Among the founders, Homer Simpson is flamboyant, while Ned Flanders is serious. Together, they bring a dynamic balance to the team.

The organization believes in a strong socialization ritual that bonds the new lawyers (newcomers) with the existing members. Also, the socialization ritual ensures that newcomers fully understand the nature of their work and integrate seamlessly into the company’s culture. During their first week, newcomers are overloaded with a barrage of artificial tasks, unexpected client calls, and a challenging meeting with the founders. This results in newcomers getting overwhelmed, and doubting their decision to join the firm, only for the founders to meet them and reveal that this is one big prank and a way to welcome them to the organization. This socialization ritual has served them well for the past two decades. However, not all the newcomers appreciate the utility of this ritual.

One of the lawyers, Ms. Lisa Simpleton, who joined in 2023 and went through the same socialization ritual, found it unwelcoming. She believes that other newcomers might also share the same opinion. Lisa thinks that the current generation, especially post-COVID, needs more friendly welcome, and the firm must put an end to this ritual.

Question 33

When a new batch of lawyers joins the organization in 2024, they receive an anonymous email, warning them about the socialization ritual, just as it is about to start. Though no newcomer paid heed to the mail, the founders are furious. They call a meeting, and announce that while employees are welcome to express their opinions, this cowardly act of sending an anonymous email shall not be tolerated.
The watercooler discussions murmur Lisa’s name. Lisa is pleased that someone shares her perspective on the socialization ritual and has acted. However, she did not write the aforementioned email. As her name continues to be mentioned, she feels overwhelmed and wonders if she needs to do something about it.

Which of the following actions by Lisa can BEST enable her to defuse the situation?

Solution

Let us go option by option and see which is the most suitable action for the described situation, 

Option A: Lisa did not send the email, nor is she directly responsible for someone else's actions. Taking accountability for something she did not do might make her appear insincere and set a precedent for accepting blame in future situations. This also does nothing to clarify her actual position to the founders or her peers.

Option B:  Ignoring the situation does not address the rumors surrounding Lisa’s involvement. This passive approach might allow the misunderstanding to persist, potentially damaging her reputation and relationships within the firm. It also risks her seeming indifferent or disengaged.

Option C: While this may seem like a direct response, addressing the entire firm could come across as defensive or overreactive, drawing unnecessary attention to the matter. It could also perpetuate the focus on the issue instead of defusing it, creating more questions about her motives and actions.

Option E: Apologizing for her opinion diminishes Lisa’s ability to voice her perspectives in the future. It also signals that dissenting viewpoints are not welcome, which could stifle healthy discussions in the organization. Moreover, a public apology implies guilt, even though Lisa is not responsible for the anonymous email.

Correct Option 

Option D: This option balances transparency with professionalism. By directly addressing the founders, Lisa can clarify her position in a controlled, private setting. She can honestly state her reservations about the ritual, which aligns with her earlier stance, while firmly denying any involvement with the anonymous email. This approach demonstrates integrity, accountability, and respect for the leadership, helping defuse the situation without unnecessary drama.


Create a FREE account and get:

  • All Quant Formulas and shortcuts PDF
  • 15 XAT previous papers with solutions PDF
  • XAT Trial Classes for FREE

    cracku

    Boost your Prep!

    Download App