DM

Option-E

This option ensures that the new faculty (A type candidates) not only maintains the quality of education in existing courses but also contributes to updating the course content by developing complementary courses. It strikes a balance between leveraging the expertise of the existing faculty and bringing in fresh perspectives to adapt to the changing business landscape.

Option-A

This option focuses on diversity in teaching styles but doesn't explicitly address the need for developing complementary courses.

Option-B

This option assumes that the existing faculty can develop complementary courses, but it might be challenging for them to manage this alone, especially considering their existing teaching responsibilities.

Option-C

Hiring candidates solely because they are willing to teach any course may compromise the quality of education. The focus should be on recruiting individuals who are both good teachers and capable of contributing to course development.

Option-D

While hiring A type candidates is a good idea, doing so unconditionally without ensuring their contribution to developing complementary courses may not fully address the challenge of adapting to the changing global business scenario.

Therefore, E is the best choice.

The correct option is A because it focuses on complementary courses, reducing direct competition and fostering collaboration between new and existing faculty members. It strikes a balance between maintaining the strengths of the current faculty and introducing innovation through new hires, thereby minimizing conflicts and politicking.

Option B is not correct because they are described as not-so-good teachers. Allowing them to teach all types of courses may compromise the overall quality of education, potentially leading to dissatisfaction among students and conflicts within the faculty.

Option C is not the most suitable option because while it maintains the excellence of existing courses by assigning A type candidates to teach them. However, it may face resistance from existing faculty members who might not be comfortable or interested in teaching new courses. This approach may lead to conflicts and challenges in implementing changes smoothly.

Option D is not correct because it creates a scenario where new A type candidates and existing faculty members are offering the same courses. This can potentially lead to conflicts and political maneuvering as faculty members compete for teaching assignments and student attention. The direct competition may hinder collaboration and harmony among the faculty.

Option E is incorrect B type candidates are described as average teachers but competent in creating and teaching new courses that complement existing ones. Allowing them to teach all kinds of courses, including existing ones, might not leverage their strengths effectively, potentially leading to a compromise in the quality of education for existing courses.

Option E is the most efficient choice by combining the teaching excellence of A type candidates with their capability to develop complementary courses, ensuring a well-rounded and resource-efficient approach.

Option A is incorrect because it may result in redundancy, as both new A type candidates and existing faculty members would be teaching the same courses. It can lead to inefficient resource allocation and potential competition for teaching assignments.

Option B is not the most efficient because B type candidates are average teachers but competent in creating and teaching new courses. Hiring them exclusively for complementary courses might not efficiently utilize their skills in teaching existing courses.

Option C is not the correct answer because the existing faculty members may not have the expertise or inclination to develop complementary courses. This approach might lead to inefficiencies in course development and potentially compromise the quality of new courses.

Option D is incorrect because C type candidates, described as not-so-good teachers, may not be the best fit for teaching-assistant responsibilities. This option may result in challenges in maintaining teaching quality and efficient utilization of faculty resources.

The correct option is E

The correct option is A because the success of the food center heavily relies on having sufficient funds to cover the costs of ingredients, salaries, operations, and maintenance. Without an adequate financial foundation, WBLCF may struggle to continue its philanthropic work and expand to nearby districts. Paying salaries, attracting diners, having enough cooks, and offering local dishes are all interconnected challenges that can be addressed more effectively with a robust financial base.

Option B is not the most critical because while paying salaries is crucial for retaining dedicated employees, it is a component of the overall financial challenge. If there are not enough finances to cover salaries, it becomes a subset of the broader issue of obtaining adequate funds and donations.

Option C is not the most critical one because while attracting diners is essential for the success of the food center, but it's not the primary challenge. Even if there are many diners, the initiative's sustainability depends on having the necessary financial resources to continue providing free meals.

Option D is not correct because having enough cooks and employees is an operational challenge but can be addressed within the broader context of financial stability. If there are sufficient funds, hiring and retaining staff becomes more manageable.

Option E is not crucial because while offering variety in the menu may be a desire expressed by diners, it is not as critical as ensuring the financial sustainability of the food center. Menu diversification can be considered once the core financial challenges are addressed.

The correct option is A

The correct option is B.

Suggestion 3 goes against the core ethos of WBLCF, which focuses on providing meals to the needy without imposing restrictions on their food intake. Encouraging diners to eat less may contradict the principle of ensuring that everyone has enough to eat.

Suggestion 4 is similar to Suggestion 3. Preaching people to eat less is not aligned with the ethos of WBLCF, which is centered around addressing hunger rather than promoting dietary restrictions.

Suggestion 5 may also contradict the mission of WBLCF. While rationing may be a practical approach to reduce wastage, it could conflict with the principle of providing enough food for those who are hungry. Imposing strict limits on the amount of food served may contradict the mission of ensuring that "no human should be hungry."

Option A is the best choice because it combines community engagement, local volunteers, a judging process, and a regular competition, providing a holistic and inclusive approach to conserving local recipes while aligning with the ethos of WBLCF.

Option B is not correct because while this involves individuals from the community, it may not capture a diverse range of local recipes. Relying on one person per week may not be sufficient to document a wide variety of dishes.

Option C is not correct because food delivery partners may not prioritize the documentation of local recipes, and their primary focus is on delivering food. The documentation process may not be as comprehensive or community-oriented as in option A.

Option D is incorrect because while a professional chef can provide expertise, this approach may not involve a broad representation of the local community. Additionally, restaurant recipes may differ from traditional home-cooked dishes that WBLCF aims to conserve.

Option E is not correct because while involving diners is a good idea, relying solely on them may not ensure a systematic and consistent approach to documentation. It may also exclude non-diners who may hold valuable knowledge about local recipes.

The correct option is A

From the points given in the question, we can calculate the expected time for each activity.

The table is given below:

First activity A will be started, and then B, and C can be started simultaneously. E and H will be dependent on C.

Similarly, D, F, and G will be dependent on B.

D, F, and G will not depend on C, H, E, and vice versa.

I activity will be started after all the 8 activities are done.

A takes = 1 min

Then B, D, F, and G will take 16 minutes.

In these 16 minutes, C and E will also be completed simultaneously.

Hence, in the first (16+1) = 17 minutes, A, B, C, D, E, F, and G will be completed. Now H will take another 10.33 minutes. After that I will take 5 minutes.

Hence, the total time taken = (17+10.33+5) = 32.33 minutes

To minimize customer dissatisfaction, the chef will follow a pessimistic schedule (worst-case scenario).

First activity A will be started, and then B, and C can be started simultaneously. E and H will be dependent on C.

Similarly, D, F, and G will be dependent on B.

D, F, and G will not depend on C, H, E, and vice versa.

I activity will be started after all the 8 activities are done.

Based on the pessimistic schedule,

A takes = 1 min

Then B, D, F, and G will take 19 minutes.

In these 19 minutes, C and E will also be completed simultaneously.

Hence, in the first (19+1) = 20 minutes, A, B, C, D, E, F, and G will be completed. Now H will take another 13 minutes. After that, I will take 5 minutes.

Hence, the total time taken = (20+13+5) = 38 minutes.

The correct option is A

The most volatile activity = |The difference between the maximum or minimum time taken and the weighted average of the time taken| is maximum.

From the table, we can see that G has the highest difference, which is (10-7.16) = 2.83

1: This suggests that visually impaired individuals can bring unique skills and strengths to the workplace, complementing the abilities of other employees.

2: Indicates that their presence can have a positive motivational impact on the entire workforce.

3: Suggests a potential positive impact on societal perceptions and can serve as an inspiration for others facing challenges.

4: Highlights a strong work ethic and determination among visually impaired individuals, challenging stereotypes.

5: Implies that an inclusive approach can positively influence the company's reputation and, subsequently, its sales.

6: Brings up a potential cost related concern which would validate the CEO’s apprehensions.

Therefore the correct answer is Option A: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 only

Option B is the correct answer.

2: This recommendation addresses the concern of involving visually impaired employees in meaningful activities by ensuring they are hired based on their abilities and contributions. It aligns with the idea of maximizing their potential in areas where they can make a valuable impact.

3: This recommendation addresses the practical aspects of creating a supportive and inclusive environment for visually impaired employees. It ensures that the workplace infrastructure is accessible and accommodating to their needs, enhancing their overall experience.

4: This recommendation recognizes the assistance that guide dogs can provide to employees with complete vision impairment. Allowing guide dogs contributes to the well-being and independence of visually impaired individuals.

These recommendations collectively address the concerns of meaningful employment, workplace accessibility, and assistance for employees with 100 percent vision impairment.

(1): This statement suggests a negative stereotype that visually impaired individuals may be perceived as inefficient or incapable of performing certain tasks. Suresh's reluctance to be served by visually impaired baristas could be rooted in this stereotype.

(2): Suresh's upbringing and the values instilled by his parents may contribute to his preference for donating rather than accepting services from individuals he perceives as "challenged." This attitude may stem from a belief in charity over direct interaction.

(3): This statement does not directly address why Suresh refuses to be served by visually impaired baristas. It suggests a belief in adverse consequences, but the nature of these consequences and their relation to his biased behavior is unclear.

(4):This statement portrays a positive sentiment towards visually impaired individuals. It implies that Suresh feels joyous when interacting with them. This positive feeling contradicts the negative bias suggested by his refusal to be served by visually impaired baristas.

Therefore Option D: 1, 2 Only is the correct answer.

Option A is the least negative among all the options because it suggests a reduction in daily working hours, which, while impacting income, may provide employees with more time for personal and moonlighting activities. It is considered the least negative among the given options because it addresses the potential time constraints without directly impacting health, family life, or financial stability to the same extent as the other options.

Option B is not correct because moonlighting often involves working additional hours beyond a primary job, which can lead to less time spent with family. Increased family problems may arise due to a lack of quality time and attention.

Option C is not correct because moonlighting can lead to an increase in workload, potentially resulting in excessive stress, fatigue, and poor physical health. The strain of managing multiple jobs may negatively impact an employee's overall well-being.

Option D is not correct because overworking, especially when juggling multiple jobs, can lead to burnout and a decline in performance. Employees may find it challenging to maintain a high level of productivity and focus when stretched too thin.

Option E is incorrect because if an employer decides to reduce salaries due to moonlighting, it can have a direct financial impact on employees. This may result in financial strain and dissatisfaction among employees, potentially leading to decreased morale and motivation.

The most suitable option is A

The correct answer is option B.

Opinion 3 suggests that Moonlighting leads to employees missing out on important organizational work, highlighting potential negative consequences for the primary job. This emphasizes the impact on the employee's commitment and performance in their main role. Opinion 4 points out the risk of unknowingly leaking critical information gained from one organization to another while Moonlighting. This highlights a potential ethical concern related to confidentiality and the potential harm to the interests of the primary employer. Together, these opinions provide a balanced perspective on the negative consequences and ethical dimensions of Moonlighting, helping Mr. Q understand the potential risks and downsides associated with taking up extra work outside his primary job.

Option A is incorrect because Opinion 2 suggests that Moonlighting is a choice of the employee, and the employer has no authority over the employee's conduct after office hours. This perspective leans towards individual freedom. However, when combined with Opinion 4, which highlights the risk of leaking critical information, it doesn't strongly emphasize the potential negative consequences and ethical concerns related to Moonlighting.

Option C is incorrect because Opinion 1 asserts that Moonlighting is unacceptable since the employer has complete control over the employee, emphasizing a strong employer-centric perspective. However, Opinion 5 suggests that Moonlighting is okay because employers are exploitative and underpay employees. These opinions present conflicting views and may not provide a coherent and balanced understanding of the ethical dimensions of Moonlighting.

Option D is not correct because Opinion 2 reiterates the idea that Moonlighting is the choice of the employee, while Opinion 3 highlights the consequence of employees missing out on important organizational work. While Opinion 3 provides a potential negative consequence, the emphasis on individual choice in Opinion 2 may not strongly convey the ethical concerns related to Moonlighting.

Option E is not correct because Opinion 2 emphasizes the employee's right to make choices after office hours, while Opinion 5 suggests that Moonlighting is okay due to perceived exploitation by employers. These opinions again provide conflicting perspectives and may not effectively address the ethical considerations associated with Moonlighting.

The correct option is B

Option E is the correct answer because it strikes a balance between centralized control and decentralized input. Allowing the CEO office to decide on leave ensures consistency and fairness in leave policies, preventing individual supervisors from making subjective decisions. On the other hand, involving supervisors in recommending promotions utilizes their insights into individual employee performance, dedication, and suitability for multi-skilling training. This dual approach ensures that decisions on leave and promotions are well-informed, fair, and consider both the broader organizational perspective and the specific performance at the supervisor level.

Option A: Leaves and promotions require different considerations, and leaving both to supervisors may lack consistency.

Option B: Centralizing promotion decisions with the CEO office and delegating leave decisions to supervisors may lead to inconsistencies and lack of coordination.

Option C: Complete centralization of leave and promotion decisions may not consider the nuanced understanding supervisors have of individual employee performance.

Option D: Maintaining the status quo may not address the challenges of identifying employees faking illness and may not ensure fair promotions.

Option B is the most prone to error because it allows supervisors to decide on leave. This introduces the risk of favoritism, biases, or inconsistencies in granting leave, potentially affecting employees' chances of promotion. Supervisors may be influenced by personal relationships or subjective judgments, leading to a less fair and objective evaluation process.

Option D not only addresses the need for assistance in the household chores but also involves Dhan's mother as a partner in the new venture. By combining efforts, they can share responsibilities and contribute to the success of the tea-cum-savoury stall, increasing their chances of realizing the entrepreneurial dream together.

Option A would help ease her day-to-day activities but not increase her chances.

Options B and C don’t make sense as her mother has to work to provide for them so asking her to do more work would be irresponsible.

Option E would help her as it would enable her to devote more time to her venture,but it does not necessarily increase her chances. This could also hamper her future education prospects.

Option E is the correct answer as it allows Dhan to scale up production while maintaining quality control. By involving willing women in the slum as business partners, she can expand the reach of "Dhan Dhana Dhan" brand without significant investment in additional space or outsourcing. This decentralized model not only fosters community participation but also empowers local women, providing a sustainable and inclusive approach to scaling up the savoury production.

Option A may limit scalability and doesn't leverage external resources efficiently.
Option B risks compromising the quality and uniqueness of Dhan's savouries.

Option C involves additional costs and logistics, potentially affecting quality control.

Option D may alienate the existing customer base in the slum, impacting goodwill.

Option C is the correct answer as it leverages the existing connection between the slum and the metropolitan region, utilizing slum dwellers who commute daily. Engaging them on a commission basis not only ensures a direct link to potential customers but also keeps the cost low, allowing Dhan to sell her products at competitive prices to a maximum number of metropolitan customers.

Option A: Hiring a celebrity endorser is likely expensive and may not align with Dhan's goal of selling at the lowest price.

Option B: Overwhelming with digital advertisements may incur high costs and might not reach the target audience effectively.

Option D may increase operational costs and may not be as effective in reaching the masses.

Option E may involve high entry barriers and potentially limit the outreach to the masses.

Educating employees about the company's anti-sexual harassment policy (Option 1) is likely to be the least ostracizing as it focuses on providing information and awareness rather than singling out individuals or taking disciplinary action. This approach promotes a broader understanding of the policy and encourages a preventive approach to reduce sexual harassment cases without directly targeting specific employees.

Option 2 could be perceived as stigmatizing and invasive, potentially leading to a sense of ostracization among employees.

Option 3 involves punitive measures and might be perceived as ostracizing without a preventive or educational component.

Therefore Option C is the correct answer.

Option C is an effective sequence for the adjudicating committee to reduce errors in judgment in sexual harassment complaints

2: This step allows the committee to gather individual perspectives without potential influence from the other party, ensuring a thorough understanding of each side of the story.

1: Bringing both parties together after listening to them separately fosters a collaborative discussion. It provides an opportunity for clarification, cross-examination, and a more comprehensive view of the case, potentially uncovering additional information or nuances.

5: Introducing a forensic expert at this stage enhances the committee's ability to objectively assess evidence. The forensic expert can provide a specialized analysis, helping to verify or challenge the credibility of the presented evidence.

This sequence combines individual perspectives, collaborative discussions, and expert analysis, aiming to minimize errors by ensuring a comprehensive and well-informed decision-making process.

Option C is the correct answer, as it prioritises the safety and well-being of the witness by keeping her identity confidential. Protecting the witness from potential threats or harm ensures a more secure environment for providing testimony. It acknowledges the sensitivity of the situation and aims to create a protective space for individuals who come forward to give their accounts.

Option A doesn't consider potential safety concerns and may discourage truthful testimony.

Option B overlooks the importance of protecting the witness and may create an unsafe environment.

Option D doesn't prioritize the witness's safety and well-being.

Option E doesn't justify compromising the witness's safety or the integrity of the inquiry process.