SRCC GBO 2010 Question Paper

In this question, the basic premise is the possibility of increasing the software budget based on concrete suggestions/plans as to how the increased budget would be used. Hence, the course of action in this scenario shall be related to the possibility of having concrete suggestions, which is exactly what the second statement provides for. The first statement regarding the trade unions is not apt in this context, because consulting them would not contribute to the possibility of having a concrete plan. 

Therefore, only the second course of action is correct. 

In this question, the basic premise relates to the penalty on coal companies for compromising the quality or quantity of coal supplies. 

Statement 1 is irrelevant to the premise as the discussion revolves around the coal companies defaulting on the coal supplies and not with respect to the requirement of thermal power plants.

Statement 2 is again irrelevant to the basic premise since the discussion on welfare schemes for employees would have no bearing on the companies defaulting on quality or quantity of coal supplies.  

The current premise requires a course of action that shall resolve the issue of irregular supply of raw materials to the food processing industry, which happens mainly because the producers are not able to secure a reasonable price for their raw material. 

Statement 1 is irrelevant because the discussion about regulating the supply of raw materials to other industries will not solve the issue for the food processing industry. 

Statement 2 is relevant for the discussion because it offers a potential solution to attract a regular supply of raw materials by giving attractive incentives.

The basic premise deals with improving the credibility of electronic media by taking actionable steps and improving its functioning as well. 

Statement 1 is a valid course of action since taking feedback shall result in having a clearer picture of the scenario and help the team take correct measures. 

Statement 2 is also a valid course of action since identifying the critical areas of training shall assist the team in having a proper training program to improve the functioning as identified by the secretary.

The basic premise is related to having solutions in hand that will allow Doordarshan to attract better talent for its programmes. 

Statement 1 is a valid course of action since a revised pay structure would attract better talent as Doordarshan's pay structure will be better when compared to its competitors. 

Statement 2 is invalid, since this will not let Doordarshan to stand out among the competitors. 

The information shall be represented as Name (Subject, Married/Unmarried, Gender)

From the given information, we can form the following conclusions: 

1. C (Social Science, Married, _) and _(Chemistry, Married, _) are married to each other. The unknown person cannot be E or G. 

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and _(_, Married, Female) are married to each other. A cannot be the husband of C because he shall teach Maths, and not Chemistry. Also, A's wife cannot be G because his wife shall not teach Physics. Hence, G shall be unmarried. 

3. E (Zoology, _, Female) and G (Physics, Unmarried, Physics) as per the given data. 

Here, C's partner cannot be B either because he/she cannot teach chemistry while C's partner does. Further, F is unmarried. This leaves us with only one option for C's partner (Chemistry), which is D. 

Therefore, C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other. The other couple has to be  A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) because there are only three females, E, G, and C, out of which G is unmarried and C is married to D. 

As of now, we have the following data: 

1. C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) are married to each other.

3. G (Physics, Unmarried, Female)

Now, F (_, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). Now, B cannot teach Chemistry or Commerce. Hence, F shall definitely teach commerce. 

Hence, the final point shall be: F (Commerce, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male).

The information shall be represented as Name (Subject, Married/Unmarried, Gender)

From the given information, we can form the following conclusions:

1. C (Social Science, Married, _) and _(Chemistry, Married, _) are married to each other. The unknown person cannot be E or G.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and _(_, Married, Female) are married to each other. A cannot be the husband of C because he shall teach Maths, and not Chemistry. Also, A's wife cannot be G because his wife shall not teach Physics. Hence, G shall be unmarried.

3. E (Zoology, _, Female) and G (Physics, Unmarried, Physics) as per the given data.

Here, C's partner cannot be B either because he/she cannot teach chemistry while C's partner does. Further, F is unmarried. This leaves us with only one option for C's partner (Chemistry), which is D.

Therefore, C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other. The other couple has to be A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) because there are only three females, E, G, and C, out of which G is unmarried and C is married to D.

As of now, we have the following data:

1. C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) are married to each other.

3. G (Physics, Unmarried, Female)

Now, F (_, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). Now, B cannot teach Chemistry or Commerce. Hence, F shall definitely teach commerce.

Hence, the final point shall be: F (Commerce, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). We cannot point out the subject taught by B because there is no data about it. 

The information shall be represented as Name (Subject, Married/Unmarried, Gender)

From the given information, we can form the following conclusions:

1. C (Social Science, Married, _) and _(Chemistry, Married, _) are married to each other. The unknown person cannot be E or G.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and _(_, Married, Female) are married to each other. A cannot be the husband of C because he shall teach Maths, and not Chemistry. Also, A's wife cannot be G because his wife shall not teach Physics. Hence, G shall be unmarried.

3. E (Zoology, _, Female) and G (Physics, Unmarried, Physics) as per the given data.

Here, C's partner cannot be B either because he/she cannot teach chemistry while C's partner does. Further, F is unmarried. This leaves us with only one option for C's partner (Chemistry), which is D.

Therefore, C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other. The other couple has to be A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) because there are only three females, E, G, and C, out of which G is unmarried and C is married to D.

As of now, we have the following data:

1. C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) are married to each other.

3. G (Physics, Unmarried, Female)

Now, F (_, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). Now, B cannot teach Chemistry or Commerce. Hence, F shall definitely teach commerce.

Hence, the final point shall be: F (Commerce, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). We cannot point out the subject taught by B because there is no data about it.

The two couples are: DC, and AE.

The information shall be represented as Name (Subject, Married/Unmarried, Gender)

From the given information, we can form the following conclusions:

1. C (Social Science, Married, _) and _(Chemistry, Married, _) are married to each other. The unknown person cannot be E or G.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and _(_, Married, Female) are married to each other. A cannot be the husband of C because he shall teach Maths, and not Chemistry. Also, A's wife cannot be G because his wife shall not teach Physics. Hence, G shall be unmarried.

3. E (Zoology, _, Female) and G (Physics, Unmarried, Physics) as per the given data.

Here, C's partner cannot be B either because he/she cannot teach chemistry while C's partner does. Further, F is unmarried. This leaves us with only one option for C's partner (Chemistry), which is D.

Therefore, C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other. The other couple has to be A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) because there are only three females, E, G, and C, out of which G is unmarried and C is married to D.

As of now, we have the following data:

1. C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) are married to each other.

3. G (Physics, Unmarried, Female)

Now, F (_, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). Now, B cannot teach Chemistry or Commerce. Hence, F shall definitely teach commerce.

Hence, the final point shall be: F (Commerce, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). We cannot point out the subject taught by B because there is no data about it.

A's wife (E) teaches zoology. 

The information shall be represented as Name (Subject, Married/Unmarried, Gender)

From the given information, we can form the following conclusions:

1. C (Social Science, Married, _) and _(Chemistry, Married, _) are married to each other. The unknown person cannot be E or G.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and _(_, Married, Female) are married to each other. A cannot be the husband of C because he shall teach Maths, and not Chemistry. Also, A's wife cannot be G because his wife shall not teach Physics. Hence, G shall be unmarried.

3. E (Zoology, _, Female) and G (Physics, Unmarried, Physics) as per the given data.

Here, C's partner cannot be B either because he/she cannot teach chemistry while C's partner does. Further, F is unmarried. This leaves us with only one option for C's partner (Chemistry), which is D.

Therefore, C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other. The other couple has to be A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) because there are only three females, E, G, and C, out of which G is unmarried and C is married to D.

As of now, we have the following data:

1. C (Social Science, Married, Female) and D(Chemistry, Married, Male) are married to each other.

2. A (Maths, Married, Male) and E(Zoology, Married, Female) are married to each other.

3. G (Physics, Unmarried, Female)

Now, F (_, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). Now, B cannot teach Chemistry or Commerce. Hence, F shall definitely teach commerce.

Hence, the final point shall be: F (Commerce, Unmarried, Male) and B (_, Unmarried, Male). We cannot point out the subject taught by B because there is no data about it.

A and D are the two males who are married.