Given below is a statement followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement: Sachin Tendulkar was the greatest batsman in Indian Cricket.
Conclusions:
I. There will be no other batsman greater than Sachin Tendulkar in Indian Cricket.
II. Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest batsman in the world.
Choose the right option from below
Sachin Tendulker was the greatest batsman of Indian cricket team :it implies that in past , many great batsman were there in Indian Cricket team but Sachin Tendulker was one of them.
So, it doesn't imply that no other batsman is greater than Sachin Tendulker.
Sachin is one of the greatest batsman of Indian cricket team but we can't imply that he is the greatest of the world.
So, none of the conclusion is right.
D is correct choice.
Create a FREE account and get:
