Please enter the following details
In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement:
(I) Air purifier is the latest innovation of this decade.
(II) Marketers identified the need and grabbed the opportunity of polluted atmosphere and created a new product for people.
Conclusions:
(I) The reason for invention of air purifier is rising levels of pollution.
(II) The need is created in market about the product and then it is established.
From statement II, as the pollution is rising marketers identified the need of air purifier and created the product air purifier. Hence conclusion I follows the given statements.
Marketers identified the need of air purifier but the need is not created in the market. Hence conclusion II do follow the given statements.
$$\therefore\ $$Only conclusion I follows the given statements.
Hence, the correct answer is Option D
Create a FREE account and get:
- Free SSC Study Material - 18000 Questions
- 230+ SSC previous papers with solutions PDF
- 100+ SSC Online Tests for Free
