Please enter the following details
Read the situation below and answer the 3 associated questions:
A powerful, intelligent king Vanamali once ruled over an ancient kingdom, Vanarajya. The kingdom was known for its high mountains and sprawling plains, and ninety percent of its land was under forest cover. Trade in forest produce was the mainstay of its economy, supported by subsistence agriculture.
With the increase of population, over time the forest in the plains was cleared for agriculture. The forest in the mountains continued to supply nutrient-enriched water and abundant forest produce to the plains. As a result, agricultural yields were bountiful. The plains prospered as compared to the mountains.
The village elders of the mountains had informed Vanamali about the presence of a precious metal in abundance under a large part of the forest. They pleaded with him to repeal his diktat and permit felling of trees for mining.
Vanamali knew that the precious metal would make his kingdom prosper. However, he was worried that mining would reduce the flow of nutrients, water and forest produce to the plains.
Vanamali’s advisor Vanapandit presented the following action plans for his consideration:
1. Repeal the forest diktat and charge hefty royalty for mining in the mountains
2. Permit mining in the mountains and enforce rainwater harvesting in the plains
3. Permit mining in the mountains and begin afforestation in the plains
4. Continue with the forest diktat in the mountains
5. Permit limited mining in rotation but maintain the forest diktat in the rest of the mountains
Which of the following sequences of action plans, in the DESCENDING order of their ability to contribute to Vanarajya’s sustainable prosperity, will be the MOST appropriate for Vanamali?
Vanamali wants the sustained property for the kingdom.
Statement (1) and (4) are completely against the requirements. Therefore, 1 and 4 will be the last in order. Statement (2) doesn't solve the problem completely. It doesn't ensure the flow of nutrients and forest produce to plains. Statement (3) doesn't solve the problem completely but is better than 2. This statement has the solution for the supply of forest produce but doesn't ensure the flow of nutrients. (5) states the best solution among all the statements. Therefore, the order will be 5, 3, 2, 4 and 1.
The answer is option E.
Create a FREE account and get:
- All Quant Formulas and shortcuts PDF
- 15 XAT previous papers with solutions PDF
- XAT Trial Classes for FREE
