A University coach was asked to select teams in three sports: Shooting, Cricket (batsmen only) and “Snakes & Ladder”. The honest and keen observer head boy of the school informed the coach that he had observed 100 students playing the three games - shooting, cricket and “Snakes & Ladder”. In shooting, all students were given 100 chances to hit a target. In cricket, a batsman faced a maximum of 100 balls, provided he DID NOT GET OUT. In “Snakes & Ladder”, every student could play 100 matches, one each with the other students and one against a computer. In shooting, a player got one point for hitting the target and zero point for missing the target. In cricket, a batsman got one point for hitting the ball and zero point for missing it. In “Snakes & Ladder”, a person got one point for winning the game and zero for losing. To the coach’s utter surprise, the distribution of points across all three games was the same. It was as follows:
The coach has to select a team of eleven in each sport.
Which of the following options is the correct statement for picking up the cricket team?
We have to analyze the nature of the games before answering the questions. '
Snake and ladder' is a game based on luck. Past performance in the game cannot be held as a reflection of one's true potential. 'Shooting' is a game extremely dependent on the skills of the player. Therefore, the past performance of the player has a huge implication on how the player might perform in the future. In 'cricket' we have details only about the player hitting the ball. We haven't been provided any information whatsoever regarding how many runs they scored on those balls. So we can't make a decision based on that. Therefore, while selecting the cricket team, we have almost limited to no information available.
Therefore, the correct answer would be Option E.
Create a FREE account and get:
- All Quant Formulas and shortcuts PDF
- XAT previous papers with solutions PDF
- XAT Trial Classes for FREE
