In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement:
(I) Kids rejoice with toys and toys give them new opportunities to think in various ways.
(II) Toys are non-living things that create a virtual world around kids to think and perceive in various ways.
Conclusions:
(I) If children don't play with toys some part of the personality is underdeveloped.
(II) Toys are mandatory and undetachable part of their personality.
The given statements indicate that kids rejoice with toys and that they give them new opportunities to think in various ways, they also create a virtual world around kids to think and perceive in various ways.
It does not mean that the children's personality will be under developed if they don't play with them, neither does it mean that toys are mandatory for the kids.
Thus, neither of the conclusion follows.
=> Ans - (C)
Create a FREE account and get:
