In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement:
(I) The DRDO has tested the Smart Anti Airfield Weapon from an Indian Air Force aircraft.
(II) The lightweight high-precision guided bomb is one of the world class weapons systems.
Conclusions:
(I) DRDO Chairman Dr. S. Christopher congratulated the DRDO and the IAF teams for the successful mission.
(II) The test was carried out by IAF's Aircraft and System Testing Establishment.
The given statements indicate that DRDO has tested the Smart Anti Airfield Weapon, which is a lightweight high-precision guided bomb and is one of the world class weapons systems, from an Indian Air Force aircraft. We cannot conclude who carried out the test, or who the chairman congratulated on the successful mission.
Thus, neither I nor II follow.
=> Ans - (C)
Create a FREE account and get:
