In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement:
(I) 28 athletes are facing legal cases due to doping incidents.
(II) The new wave of Olympic doping cases is based on evidences.
Conclusions:
(I) The report of doping is based on the test that happen.
(II) Doping practice is very common these days among athletes.
The given statements indicates that 28 athletes are charged with doping incidents in Olympics and it is based on evidences, thus the first conclusion contradicts it, hence it does not follow, also we cannot conclude that it is very common among athletes, since we do not know the total participants or the percent of people actually practicing it.
Thus, neither I nor II follow.
=> Ans - (C)
Create a FREE account and get:
