There are 25 rooms in a hotel. Each room can accommodate at the most three people. For each room, the single occupancy charge is Rs. 2000 per day, the double occupancy charge is Rs. 3000 per day, and the triple occupancy charge is Rs. 3500 per day.
If there are 55 people staying in the hotel today, what is the maximum possible revenue from room occupancy charges today?
XAT Averages, Ratio and Proportion Questions
So, there are 25 rooms in total and 55 people need to be occupied in the these 25 rooms. We need to maximize the revenue.
The cost of a single, double and triple occupancy room is Rs. 2,000, Rs. 3,000 and Rs. 3,500 respectively.
Now, if we look at the per person cost from a single, double and triple occupancy room, it will be Rs. 2,000, Rs. 1,500 and Rs. 1,166.67
Now, we clearly see that the per person cost is maximum for single occupancy room but we know that there are only 25 rooms which are not sufficient. Hence, we will aim to adjust all the 55 people to the maximum possible single occupancy then double occupancy and then triple occupancy room.
Let the number of single, double and triple occupancy rooms used are $$x$$, $$y$$ and $$z$$ respectively.
We know $$x+y+z=25$$ as the total number of rooms are 25.
Further, $$x+2y+3z=55$$ I.e. total number of people.
If z = 1, y = 28 which is not possible as the number of rooms are limited to 25.
If z = 2, y = 26 which is again not possible.
If z = 3, y = 24 which is again not possible.
If z = 4, y = 22 which is again not possible.
If z = 5, y = 20 which is possible.
Hence, to maximize the revenue, we have to use 20 room of double occupancy and 5 rooms of triple occupancy.
Hence, the total revenue will be $$20\times3,000\ +5\times3.500=77,500$$
Eight employees of an organization have been rated on a scale of 1 to 50 for their performance. All ratings are integers. The overall average rating of the eight employees is 30. While the five employees with the highest ratings average 38, the five employees with the lowest ratings average 25.
Which of the following, about the ratings obtained by the eight employees, is DEFINITELY FALSE?
It is given that the average of the first five highest-rated employees is 38. So, the sum of the ratings of the top 5 highest-rated employees is 38 * 5 = 190.
It is given that the average of the first five lowest-rated employees is 25. So, the sum of the ratings of the top 5 lowest-rated employees is 25 * 5 = 125.
The overall average rating of all the employees is given as 30. So, the sum of the ratings of all the employees is given as 30 * 8 = 240.
The sum of the 3 highest rated employees' ratings can be obtained by subtracting the sum of the 5 lowest rated players' ratings from the overall rating, which is 240 - 125 = 115.
The sum of the 3 lowest rated employees' ratings can be obtained by subtracting the sum of the 5 highest rated players' ratings from the overall rating, which is 240 - 190 = 50.
So, the sum of the 4th and 5th highest-rated employees is 190 - 115 = 75.
Now let us look at the options to eliminate the wrong option,
Option A)
It is given that the second-highest rating is 38. It is not an incorrect option because there is a possible case of the second highest being 38 and satisfying all the above conditions. The first 5, in that case, can be 39, 38, 38, 38, 37, which satisfies the above conditions.
Option B)
Same as the above case, we can have the 4th and 5th ratings to be 38 and 37, and in that case, the median of the ratings of the employees becomes $$\dfrac{37\ +\ 38}{2}\ =\ 37.5$$. So, this is not an incorrect option.
Option C)
We know that the sum of the lowest three ratings is 50, and in that case, there are possibilities of the lowest rating being 1 and the sum of the three is 50. For example, 37, 12, 1 is one of the cases. Hence, this is not an incorrect option.
Option D)
The highest rating cannot be 40 because if it is 40, then the sum of the 2nd and 3rd becomes 75. In that case, the 3rd rated person's rating has to be less than or equal to 37, and we know that the 4th person's rating must be greater than or equal to 38. So, if the third person rating is 37 or less, then there is no possibility as the 4th person rating must be less than 3rd person rating. So, option D is incorrect.
Option E)
As explained in option C, the set of the last three rated employees can be 37, 12 and 1, and in this case, we can see that the third lowest player's rating is 37. So, E is not an incorrect option.
Hence, the correct answer is option D.
The market value of beams, made of a rare metal, has a unique property: the market value of any such beam is proportional to the square of its length. Due to an accident, one such beam got broken into two pieces having lengths in the ratio 4:9. Considering each broken piece as a separate beam, how much gain or loss, with respect to the market value of the original beam before the accident, is incurred?
Given that the beam got broken into two pieces, with length in a ratio of 4 : 9.
Let the lengths of the new beams be $$4x$$ and $$9x$$ respectively.
So, the length of the original beam is $$13x$$.
Now, given the value is proportional to the square of its length.
Value of the original beam = $$k\left(13x\right)^2=169kx^2$$, where $$k$$ is the constant of proportionality.
The value of new beams is $$k\left(4x\right)^2+k\left(9x\right)^2=16kx^2+81kx^2=97kx^2$$
Hence, the gain/loss with respect to the original beam is $$169kx^2-97kx^2=72kx^2$$
In percentage terms, Loss % = $$\dfrac{72kx^2}{169kx^2}\times100=42.60\%$$
Hence, the answer is 42.60% loss
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, Averages, Ratio and Proportion are fundamental arithmetic topics in XAT Quantitative Ability. These concepts form the basis for several other topics such as mixtures, partnerships, percentages, and profit and loss.
XAT may include questions on simple averages, weighted averages, ratios, proportions, direct and inverse variation, partnerships, and real-life applications involving comparative quantities.
Begin by understanding the core concepts and formulas. Practice a variety of questions involving averages, ratio comparisons, proportional relationships, and arithmetic applications to improve speed and accuracy.
Most questions from these topics are moderate in difficulty. Candidates with a strong grasp of arithmetic fundamentals can solve them efficiently using logical approaches and basic calculations.
Cracku's XAT Averages, Ratio and Proportion Questions are designed according to the latest XAT exam pattern and difficulty level. They provide topic-wise practice, detailed solutions, shortcut techniques to help aspirants strengthen arithmetic concepts, improve accuracy, and build confidence for the exam.
You can practice XAT Averages, Ratio and Proportion questions through topic-wise question banks, previous year papers, sectional tests, and mock tests that offer detailed explanations and solution methods.