SRCC GBO 2015 Question Paper

From the above statements, we can conclude that Ramcharan (lawyer) is from the first generation, with his wife being Sudha because she has a daughter-in-law.

Now, Rohit is the son of Ramcharan, and Monica(doctor) is the sister of a teacher. It is also given that Asha is married to a teacher. Since there can be only two couples, we can say that Rohit (teacher) is married to Asha, and Monica (doctor) is his sister. Now, the Rohit shall have two children as per the conditions (each housewife shall have two children), and one of them shall be Shikha. 

Rohit is a teacher (option C). 

From the above statements, we can conclude that Ramcharan (lawyer) is from the first generation, with his wife being Sudha because she has a daughter-in-law.

Now, Rohit is the son of Ramcharan, and Monica(doctor) is the sister of a teacher. It is also given that Asha is married to a teacher. Since there can be only two couples, we can say that Rohit (teacher) is married to Asha, and Monica (doctor) is his sister. Now, the Rohit shall have two children as per the conditions (each housewife shall have two children), and one of them shall be Shikha.

Ramcharan (first), Monica (second), and Shikha (third). 

From the above statements, we can conclude that Ramcharan (lawyer) is from the first generation, with his wife being Sudha because she has a daughter-in-law.

Now, Rohit is the son of Ramcharan, and Monica(doctor) is the sister of a teacher. It is also given that Asha is married to a teacher. Since there can be only two couples, we can say that Rohit (teacher) is married to Asha, and Monica (doctor) is his sister. Now, the Rohit shall have two children as per the conditions (each housewife shall have two children), and one of them shall be Shikha.

From this, we cannot say for sure if Sudha has two grand daughters as we only know about one (Shikha). Rest all the statements are true. 

North ----- left (now, west) ----- left (now, south) ------ right 45 degree (now, south west as initial direction was south). 

Hence, she is moving in the south west direction.

The resultant displacement of Raghubir shall be 2 km to the west of the starting point.

It is given that Krishna walks 10km North and then 6km back south, so effectively, he has walked 4 km North. 
It is then given that he walks 3km East. 

North and East are directions that are at right angles to each other. We know he has walked 4km North and 3km East, 
To find the distance to his starting point, we use the Pythagoras theorem to find the effective distance 
$$\sqrt{3^2+4^2}=5$$

Hence, the answer is 5km North-East. 

The assertion is correct, as a person jumping off the train falls forward. However, this happens mainly because of a change in inertia, and the reason given here does not actually elaborate on inertia, while it is true about Newton's first law of motion. Hence, both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation about A. 

Gandhiji indeed withdrew from the Non-Cooperation movement for some time. This mainly happened because the non-violent means were being compromised by certain groups, and there were incidents of violence. Hence, both A and R are true in this case, and R is the correct explanation of A.

A talks about parachutes enabling a person to descend from height at a slower and safer speed. Its explanation is correctly given by R, which talks about the material of a parachute and how the mechanism helps in descending at a slower speed. Hence, both statements are true and R is the correct explanation of A.

Both A and R are true, and R correctly explains as to why cooking is tedious on hills.