SRCC GBO 2009

Let us test each statement and see if we can arrive at the number of daughters L has.

1 talks about the number of daughters that R's father has. However, to answer the question, we need additional information about the relation between R and L. This is given by 2, that ‘T’ is R’s sister and daughter of L. Using this, we know L is a parent of R. Hence, L has three daughters, which we get by combining both 1 and 2. 

If we combine both P and Q, we get to know that M is the sister of C. However, we cannot answer the question pertaining to C's brother. Hence, the data together is insufficient. 

Let us test each statement and see whether we can get the number of Telugu novels.

1. There are only three types of novels, and of the one thousand novels is the library, fifty percent novels are in English and Hindi. This means that the remaining 500 books are Telugu novels. 

2. Even after knowing that Hindi novels are double in number than English novels, we have no clue about the exact number of any of these categories. Hence, we can't find the number of Telugu novels from this data.

Even when we know the date on which the statement was made and the fact that it is a leap year, we still don't know about the date of expiry of the driving license. Hence, we can't give the exact date before which the license shall be renewed. 

Since the area is 484 sq. cm:

P. If it costs Rs. 912 to fence the playground, we need to get the cost of fencing per cm to arrive at the perimeter of the playground. However, the same is not mentioned, and hence, we cannot answer the question using this data. 

Q. If the playground is a perfect square, we can use the given area to find the value of each of the sides. The sides, thus, are of 22 cm. From this, we can find the perimeter, which is four times the side, that becomes 88 cm. 

Out of Ear, Lungs, Heart, and Kidney: Ear is a body part, while others are functioning organs. 

The path can be traced like:
After moving to 10 m to west, he moves 20 m north, and then again 10 m east. The movement in west and then east will cancel each other, further making the movement to north the only effective one. Hence, he is 20 m north from the initial starting point.

The statement talks about a connection between ulcers and anxiety. However, it also states that some happy-go-lucky people also suffer from ulcers. Now, we need to have a strong set of data to strengthen the connection between ulcers and anxiety. 

1. This option talks about peptic ulcer, which is a specific case of ulcers. Further, this is a mere statement and hence doesn't add value to the original information. Hence, a weak option.

2. Even if anxiety is more harmful than ulcers, we cannot use this to strengthen the association between anxiety and ulcers. 

3. Even if about 90% of women suffer from ulcers, we don't get any input to support the association of ulcers and anxiety. 

4. If more than 65% of the ulcer patients were found to be high on anxiety, we can strongly claim the association of anxiety and ulcers. Hence, a strong statement to substantiate the premise. 

It is best to eliminate each option in this question. 

1. This can be a valid conclusion owing to the line Research in this area is extremely homogeneous, as anywhere from 50% to 85% of this literature employs scales developed by APA.

2. The statement mentions that 'employs scales developed by APA'. The word 'scales' shows that there are more than one scale developed by APA. 

3. It is mentioned that role conflict and ambiguity are the 'most widely' examined source, which shows that there might be other sources as well. 

4. There is nothing to conclude that the area has a dearth of literature. 

Hence, the first option is correct. 

We know that: A>B, C>D, and D>E. 

To know who is taller, we need a link connecting A>B to the other two conditions. 

1. Even if A is taller than E and D, we don't know about its relation with C. Hence, we cannot find the tallest person. 

2. Even if C is taller than B, we cannot deduce the taller person among A and C. Hence, this is an incorrect choice. 

3. Even if A is taller than D, we cannot deduce the taller person among A and C. Hence, this is an incorrect choice.

4. If E is taller than A, we know that C will be the tallest. Hence, this is the correct choice.