MAT 2003 Question Paper

Let weight of C be c units.
From (iii), we can say that d = 2c and from (iv), we can say e = 2d = 4c
From (ii), b = 4.5c and from (i), a = 2b = 9c
Hence, the order from heaviest to lightest can be given as A, B, E, D, C

Let weight of C be c units.
From (iii), we can say that d = 2c and from (iv), we can say e = 2d = 4c
From (ii), b = 4.5c and from (i), a = 2b = 9c 
Hence, the order from heaviest to lightest can be given as A, B, E, D, C

Let the weight of C be c units.
From the given data, we can plot the weights as:
a = 9c, b = 4.5c, d = 2c, e = 4c

Hence, the descending order in weight is: A, B, E, D, C 

Let the weight of C be c units.
From the given data, we can plot the weights as:
a = 9c, b = 4.5c, d = 2c, e = 4c

Hence, the descending order in weight is: A, B, E, D, C i.e. option A

The logic here is

$$15-6=9$$

$$28-15=13$$

Similarly,

$$69-60=9$$

$$82-69=13$$

$$\therefore\ $$(60, 69, 82) is similar to the given set (6, 15, 28)

Hence, the correct answer is Option D

The logic here is

$$81-77=4$$

$$77-69=8$$

Similarly,

$$56-52=4$$

$$52-44=8$$

$$\therefore\ $$(56, 52, 44) is similar to the given set (81, 77, 69)

Hence, the correct answer is Option A

It has been given that tax regulation and liberal policies took place in the 1980s and 90s. And it has also been given that since 1990, a substantial number (half a million) new entrepreneurs have started new ventures. The implicit assumption here is that the incentives given in the form of taxes and incentives were the reason for the surge in new venture and boost to entrepreneurship. 

We are given that any building with more than 3 floors has a lift (elevator) to access the floors. Hence, naturally, seventh floor in a building will have a lift. 
However, we are not given whether all the floors re accessible by lifts or the lift service is only available from the third floor. Hence, we cannot say anything conclusively about options A, B and D. Hence, only B is definitely true. 

The given statement implies that a team's success is due to the bonding and support team members extend to each other. A good camaraderie between the workers and healthy environment of human bonding goes a long way in ensuring success. 

We have to find a statement which weakens this statement. This is done by option A which, if true, changes the needle of a team's success from tam members supporting each other to the dominance and authority established by the group leader. Option A turns the given statement on its head and hence, weakens it greatly. 

The author says that apart form a few people who clearly fall in the category of definitely intelligent/definitely not intelligent, there is a definite class of people whom we can label as intelligent and not so at the same time. This makes it ambiguous and the author wonders whether one has the right to call them any of the 2 as per his inclination. This is best reflected in the option C. 
Option A does not cover the author's thought correctly.