JEE Current Electricity Questions

We are given a galvanometer of resistance $$G = 100 \, \Omega$$ that, when connected in series with a resistance of $$400 \, \Omega$$, measures a voltage of up to $$10$$ V.

The full-scale deflection current of the galvanometer, $$I_g$$, can be found as follows.

When the galvanometer is used as a voltmeter with a series resistance $$R_s = 400 \, \Omega$$, the total resistance in the circuit is:

$$R_{total} = G + R_s = 100 + 400 = 500 \, \Omega$$

Using Ohm's law, the full-scale deflection current is:

$$I_g = \frac{V}{R_{total}} = \frac{10}{500} = 0.02 \text{ A}$$

To convert a galvanometer into an ammeter, a low resistance (called a shunt, $$S$$) is connected in parallel with the galvanometer. The shunt diverts most of the current, allowing only $$I_g$$ to pass through the galvanometer. The formula for the shunt resistance is:

$$S = \frac{I_g \cdot G}{I - I_g}$$

This comes from the condition that the voltage across the galvanometer equals the voltage across the shunt: $$I_g \cdot G = (I - I_g) \cdot S$$.

Here, $$I = 10$$ A (the desired full-scale reading of the ammeter), $$I_g = 0.02$$ A, and $$G = 100 \, \Omega$$:

$$S = \frac{0.02 \times 100}{10 - 0.02} = \frac{2}{9.98} \approx 0.2004 \, \Omega$$

Expressed in the required form, $$S \approx 0.2 \, \Omega = 20 \times 10^{-2} \, \Omega$$.

Therefore, $$x = 20$$.

The correct answer is Option (3): 20.

We need to find the percentage decrease in illumination when current drops by 20%.

Since for a resistive lamp the power (and hence illumination) is proportional to $$I^2$$, we have $$P = I^2 R$$.

If the current drops by 20%, the new current becomes $$I' = 0.8I$$ and substituting into the expression for power gives $$P' = (0.8I)^2 R = 0.64 I^2 R = 0.64P$$.

Therefore, the percentage decrease is given by $$\frac{P - P'}{P} \times 100 = (1 - 0.64) \times 100 = 36\%$$.

The correct answer is Option 3: 36%.

I = P/V = 110/220 = 0.5 A. n = I/e = 0.5/(1.6×10⁻¹⁹) = 3.125×10¹⁸ = 31.25×10¹⁷.

The correct answer is Option (4): 31.25×10¹⁷.

We are asked to determine how the specific resistance (resistivity) changes when the length of the wire is doubled.

A key concept is that specific resistance (resistivity) is an intrinsic property of the material.

The relationship between resistance and resistivity is given by $$R = \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{S_1 L}{\pi r^2}$$, where $$R$$ is the resistance, $$\rho = S_1$$ is the specific resistance (resistivity), $$L$$ is the length, and $$A = \pi r^2$$ is the cross-sectional area.

Rewriting this expression gives $$S_1 = \frac{R \cdot \pi r^2}{L} = \frac{X \cdot \pi r^2}{L}$$.

When the wire length is doubled, two approaches confirm that resistivity remains constant. First, since resistivity depends only on the material (its temperature, composition, etc.) and is independent of the dimensions of the wire, replacing it with a wire of length $$2L$$ does not change $$S_1$$.

Alternatively, if the length becomes $$2L$$ while maintaining the same cross section, the new resistance is $$X' = \frac{S_1 \times 2L}{\pi r^2} = 2X$$. Calculating resistivity from the new measurements gives $$S_1' = \frac{X' \cdot \pi r^2}{2L} = \frac{2X \cdot \pi r^2}{2L} = \frac{X \cdot \pi r^2}{L} = S_1$$, confirming that the resistivity remains the same regardless of the wire's dimensions.

The correct answer is Option 4: $$S_1$$.

Original: $$W = \frac{V^2}{R}$$.

Wire cut in two halves: each has resistance $$R/2$$.

Two halves in parallel: $$R_{eq} = \frac{(R/2)(R/2)}{R/2 + R/2} = \frac{R/4}{R} \cdot R = \frac{R}{4}$$.

New power: $$W' = \frac{V^2}{R/4} = \frac{4V^2}{R} = 4W$$.

The answer is Option (4): $$\boxed{4W}$$.

In a meter bridge, at balance: $$\frac{R_1}{R_2} = \frac{l}{100 - l}$$

Given: $$R_1 = 4.5 \; \Omega$$ (left gap), balance length $$l = 60$$ cm.

$$\frac{4.5}{R_2} = \frac{60}{40} = \frac{3}{2}$$

$$R_2 = \frac{4.5 \times 2}{3} = 3 \; \Omega$$

The wire in the right gap has length $$l_w = 10$$ cm $$= 0.1$$ m and radius $$r = \sqrt{7} \times 10^{-4}$$ m.

Using $$R_2 = \frac{\rho l_w}{\pi r^2}$$:

$$3 = \frac{\rho \times 0.1}{\pi \times 7 \times 10^{-8}}$$

$$\rho = \frac{3 \times \pi \times 7 \times 10^{-8}}{0.1} = \frac{21\pi \times 10^{-8}}{0.1} = 21\pi \times 10^{-7}$$

$$\rho = 21 \times 3.14159 \times 10^{-7} \approx 65.97 \times 10^{-7} \approx 66 \times 10^{-7} \; \Omega \text{m}$$

So $$R = 66$$.

The answer is $$66$$, which corresponds to Option (3).

The resistance of a conductor varies with temperature according to:

$$R = R_0(1 + \alpha \Delta T)$$

where $$R_0$$ is the resistance at the reference temperature, $$\alpha$$ is the temperature coefficient of resistance, and $$\Delta T$$ is the change in temperature.

Given: $$R_0 = 60 \text{ } \Omega$$ at $$27°C$$, supply voltage $$= 220 \text{ V}$$, current $$= 2.75 \text{ A}$$, $$\alpha = 2 \times 10^{-4} \text{ °C}^{-1}$$.

First, find the resistance at the operating temperature:

$$R = \frac{V}{I} = \frac{220}{2.75} = 80 \text{ } \Omega$$

Now apply the temperature-resistance relation:

$$80 = 60(1 + 2 \times 10^{-4} \times \Delta T)$$

$$\frac{80}{60} = 1 + 2 \times 10^{-4} \times \Delta T$$

$$\frac{4}{3} = 1 + 2 \times 10^{-4} \times \Delta T$$

$$\frac{1}{3} = 2 \times 10^{-4} \times \Delta T$$

$$\Delta T = \frac{1}{3 \times 2 \times 10^{-4}} = \frac{10^4}{6} \approx 1667°C$$

The final temperature is:

$$T = 27 + 1667 = 1694°C$$

The correct answer is $$1694°C$$.

Treat each voltmeter as a resistor (since a voltmeter has very high but finite resistance).

Between A and B there are two parallel branches:

• top branch: V₁ and V₂ in series
• bottom branch: V₃ alone

step 1: voltage across branches

Both branches are connected across the same points A and B ⇒ same total voltage across each branch.

So:

V₁ + V₂ = V₃

step 2: conclusion

$$V_3=V_1+V_2$$

$$R = R_0(1+\alpha\Delta T)$$. $$62 = 50(1+2.4\times10^{-4}(T-27))$$.

$$1.24 = 1 + 2.4\times10^{-4}(T-27)$$.

$$0.24 = 2.4\times10^{-4}(T-27)$$.

$$T-27 = 1000 \implies T = 1027$$°C.

The answer is $$\boxed{1027}$$.

all three resistors (R₁, 20 Ω, 15 Ω) are in parallel between the same two nodes

so total current = sum of branch currents

given:
current through 20 Ω = 0.3 A
total current = 0.9 A

so current through the other two branches:

I₁ + I₃ = 0.9 − 0.3 = 0.6 A

step 1: find voltage across network

V = I × R = 0.3 × 20 = 6 V

step 2: current through 15 Ω

I₃ = 6 / 15 = 0.4 A

step 3: current through R₁

I₁ = 0.6 − 0.4 = 0.2 A

step 4: find R₁

R₁ = V / I₁ = 6 / 0.2 = 30 Ω

Step 1: Calculate the resistance of the heater($$R_H$$)

Using the rated power and voltage:

$$ R_H = \frac{V_{rated}^2}{P_{rated}} $$

$$ R_H = \frac{100^2}{1000} $$

$$ R_H = 10 \Omega $$

Step 2: Calculate the voltage across the heater when operating at 62.5 W

Let the new voltage across the heater be $$V_H$$.

$$ P_{new} = \frac{V_H^2}{R_H} $$

$$ 62.5 = \frac{V_H^2}{10} $$

$$ V_H^2 = 625 $$

$$ V_H = 25 \text{ V} $$

Step 3: Determine the total current in the circuit ($$I_{total}$$)

The heater and the resistor $$R$$ are in parallel. This combination is in series with the $$10 \Omega$$ resistor.

The voltage across the parallel combination (between points B and C) is $$V_{BC} = V_H = 25 \text{ V}$$.

The total voltage of the source is $$100 \text{ V}$$.

The voltage across the $$10 \Omega$$ series resistor is:

$$ V_{series} = 100 - V_{BC} $$

$$ V_{series} = 100 - 25 = 75 \text{ V} $$

Now, find the total current flowing through the $$10 \Omega$$ series resistor:

$$ I_{total} = \frac{V_{series}}{10} $$

$$ I_{total} = \frac{75}{10} = 7.5 \text{ A} $$

Step 4: Determine the current through the unknown resistor $$R$$

The total current splits at node B into the heater and resistor $$R$$.

First, find the current through the heater ($$I_H$$):

$$ I_H = \frac{V_H}{R_H} = \frac{25}{10} = 2.5 \text{ A} $$

Using Kirchhoff's Current Law ($$I_{total} = I_H + I_R$$):

$$ I_R = I_{total} - I_H $$

$$ I_R = 7.5 - 2.5 = 5 \text{ A} $$

Step 5: Calculate the value of $$R$$

The voltage across $$R$$ is $$V_{BC} = 25 \text{ V}$$, and the current through it is $$I_R = 5 \text{ A}$$.

$$ R = \frac{V_{BC}}{I_R} $$

$$ R = \frac{25}{5} $$

$$ R = 5 \Omega $$

Wire 20Ω divided into 10 parts: each 2Ω. Pairs in parallel: 2||2=1Ω. 5 such pairs in series: 5Ω.

The answer is $$\boxed{5}$$.

Volume conserved: $$\pi r^2 l = \pi (r/2)^2 l' \Rightarrow l' = 4l$$.

$$R' = \rho \frac{l'}{A'} = \rho \frac{4l}{\pi(r/2)^2} = \rho \frac{4l}{\pi r^2/4} = 16 \cdot \rho\frac{l}{\pi r^2} = 16R$$.

So $$x = 16$$.

The answer is 16.

R₁ = 6 Ω is short circuited → ignore it

R₂ = 2 Ω and R₃ = 2 Ω are connected between same two nodes → parallel

R₂ ∥ R₃ = (2×2)/(2+2) = 1 Ω

this is in series with R₄ = 2 Ω

so, (R₂ ∥ R₃) + R₄ = 1 + 2 = 3 Ω

now this 3 Ω is in parallel with R₅ = 3 Ω and R₆ = 3 Ω

so,

$$R_{eq}=3∥3∥3=1Ω$$

final answer: 1 Ω

ammeter = coil (240 Ω) in parallel with shunt (10 Ω)

step 1: equivalent resistance of ammeter

$$RA=\frac{\left(240\times10\right)}{240+10}=\frac{2400}{250}=9.6Ω$$

$$R_{total}=140.4+9.6=150Ω$$

step 3: total current

$$I=\frac{24}{150}=0.16A$$

Find temperature $$t$$ (in Kelvin) given resistance values at different temperatures.

$$R_t = R_0(1 + \alpha t)$$

At $$t = 100°C$$: $$R_{100} = R_0(1 + 100\alpha)$$

$$10.2 = 10(1 + 100\alpha) \implies 1.02 = 1 + 100\alpha \implies \alpha = \frac{0.02}{100} = 0.0002 \; °C^{-1}$$

$$10.95 = 10(1 + 0.0002t) \implies 1.095 = 1 + 0.0002t \implies t = \frac{0.095}{0.0002} = 475°C$$

$$T = 475 + 273 = 748 \text{ K}$$

The correct answer is 748.

step 1: identify key nodes

Let node C be reference (0 V).

We want current through the 1 Ω resistor (between left junction and C).

step 2: simplify structure

Notice:

• B-C = 2 Ω
• D-C = 2 Ω
• A connects to B and D via 4 Ω each
• C connects to E (5 V source)
• A to C branch has: 10 V source + 1 Ω

step 3: use symmetry

The top and bottom halves (via 4Ω-2Ω and 4Ω-2Ω) are symmetric → so B and D are at same potential.

Thus currents through those two paths are equal.

So equivalent of those two paths from A to C:

Each path: 4 + 2 = 6 Ω

Two identical 6 Ω in parallel → equivalent = 3 Ω

step 4: reduced circuit

Now between A and C we have:

• one branch: 10 V source in series with 1 Ω
• another branch: 3 Ω

And C to E is just a wire with 5 V source setting potential.

step 5: set node voltages

Let C = 0 V
Then E = 5 V

Let $$A=V_A$$

step 6: currents from A to C

Branch 1 (via 3Ω):
$$I₁=V_A/3$$

Branch 2 (via 1Ω + 10V source):

Careful with polarity: from diagram, going A → C, the 10 V source gives a drop.

So:
$$I₂=(V_A−10)/1=V_A−10$$

step 7: KCL at node A

Total current leaving A = 0:

$$V_A/3+(V_A−10)=0$$

Multiply by 3:

$$V_A+3V_A−30=0$$
$$4V_A=30$$
$$V_A=7.5V$$

step 8: current through 1Ω

$$I=V_A−10=7.5−10=−2.5A$$

Magnitude = 2.5 A

step 9: match form

I = n/10

2.5 = n/10
n = 25

$$\text{Net EMF } (E_{\text{net}}) = E_1 - E_2 \implies 8 - 2 = 6\text{ V}$$

$$R_{\text{total}} = r_1 + r_2 \implies 2 + 4 = 6\ \Omega$$

$$I = \frac{E_{\text{net}}}{R_{\text{total}}} \implies \frac{6}{6} = 1\text{ A}$$

$$V_2 = E_2 + I r_2 \implies 2 + (1 \times 4) = 6\text{ V}$$

Given same material:

• Same resistivity ρ\rhoρ
• Same mass means same volume (since density same)

So

$$A_Al_A=A_Bl_B$$

where area

$$A=\pi r^2$$

Since

$$r_A=2mm,r_B​=4mm$$

$$\frac{A_A}{A_B}=\frac{2^2}{4^2}=\frac{1}{4}$$

Thus

$$A_Al_A=A_Bl_B$$

gives

$$\frac{1}{4}l_A=l_B$$

$$l_A=4l_B$$

Resistance:

$$R=\frac{\rho l}{A}$$

So

$$\frac{R_A}{R_B}=\frac{l_A}{l_B}\cdot\frac{A_B}{A_A}$$

$$4\cdot4=16$$

Given

$$R_B=2Ω$$

therefore

$$R_A=16(2)=32Ω$$

The voltmeter (10 kΩ) is connected in parallel with the unknown resistance R, so the measured V-I relation corresponds to the equivalent resistance of the parallel combination.

From the graph:

At V = 8 V, I = 4 mA

So equivalent resistance:

$$Req=\frac{V}{I}=\frac{8}{4\times10^{-3}}=2000Ω=2kΩ$$

Now,

Req=R∥10 kΩ

$$\frac{1}{2000}=\frac{1}{R}+\frac{1}{10000}$$

Solve:

$$\frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{2000}-\frac{1}{10000}=\frac{5-1}{10000}=\frac{4}{10000}=\frac{1}{2500}$$

R=2500 Ω=2.5 kΩ

$$100\Omega$$ and $$200\Omega$$ in series, battery 4V. Voltmeter across $$100\Omega$$ reads 1V.

The voltmeter (resistance $$R_V$$) is in parallel with $$100\Omega$$. Equivalent = $$\frac{100 R_V}{100 + R_V}$$.

Total resistance = $$\frac{100R_V}{100+R_V} + 200$$.

Current = $$\frac{4}{\frac{100R_V}{100+R_V} + 200}$$.

Voltage across parallel combination = 1V.

So voltage across $$200\Omega$$ = 3V. Current = $$\frac{3}{200} = 0.015$$ A.

For the parallel combination: $$V = IR_{eq}$$: $$1 = 0.015 \times \frac{100R_V}{100+R_V}$$

$$\frac{100R_V}{100+R_V} = \frac{1}{0.015} = \frac{200}{3}$$

$$300R_V = 200(100 + R_V) = 20000 + 200R_V$$

$$100R_V = 20000 \Rightarrow R_V = 200\Omega$$

Therefore, the answer is $$\boxed{200}$$.

The charge flowing in a conductor is $$Q(t) = \alpha t - \beta t^2 + \gamma t^3$$.

$$I(t) = \frac{dQ}{dt} = \alpha - 2\beta t + 3\gamma t^2$$

$$\frac{dI}{dt} = -2\beta + 6\gamma t = 0$$

$$t = \frac{\beta}{3\gamma}$$

Since $$\frac{d^2I}{dt^2} = 6\gamma > 0$$ (assuming $$\gamma > 0$$), this is indeed a minimum.

$$I_{\min} = \alpha - 2\beta \cdot \frac{\beta}{3\gamma} + 3\gamma \cdot \frac{\beta^2}{9\gamma^2}$$

$$= \alpha - \frac{2\beta^2}{3\gamma} + \frac{\beta^2}{3\gamma}$$

$$= \alpha - \frac{\beta^2}{3\gamma}$$

The minimum value of current is $$\alpha - \frac{\beta^2}{3\gamma}$$.

The correct answer is Option 4: $$\alpha - \frac{\beta^2}{3\gamma}$$.

3015150

The left-hand branch contains a cell of emf $$E_1 = 6\ \text{V}$$ and internal resistance $$r_1 = 2\ \Omega$$.
The right-hand branch contains a cell of emf $$E_2 = 4\ \text{V}$$ and internal resistance $$r_2 = 1\ \Omega$$.
The two junctions of the branches are connected by the resistor $$R_2 = 3\ \Omega$$, whose current we have to find.

Case 1: Open-circuit condition ( $$R_2$$ removed )
With no external connection between the junctions, no current flows through either internal resistance, so the potentials of the junctions are simply equal to the emfs of their respective cells: the left junction is at $$6\ \text{V}$$ and the right junction at $$4\ \text{V}$$ with respect to the common return conductor.

Hence, when $$R_2$$ is connected, a potential difference of
$$V = E_1 - E_2 = 6\ \text{V} - 4\ \text{V} = 2\ \text{V}$$
exists across it, driving current from the left junction (higher potential) to the right junction (lower potential).

Case 2: Closed circuit ( $$R_2$$ in place )
The three resistances $$r_1,\, R_2$$ and $$r_2$$ now form one continuous path for the current. Applying Ohm’s law to this single loop,

$$I = \frac{\text{net emf}}{\text{total resistance}}$$

The net emf acting in the direction of current is $$E_1 - E_2 = 2\ \text{V}$$, and the total resistance encountered is
$$R_{\text{total}} = r_1 + R_2 + r_2 = 2\ \Omega + 3\ \Omega + 1\ \Omega = 6\ \Omega$$.

Therefore,
$$I = \frac{2\ \text{V}}{6\ \Omega} = \frac{1}{3}\ \text{A}$$.

The current of $$\tfrac{1}{3}\ \text{A}$$ flows from the left cell to the right cell through $$R_2$$, that is, from the 6 V side to the 4 V side.

Hence, the magnitude of the current through $$R_2$$ is $$\tfrac{1}{3}\ \text{A}$$, which matches Option C.

The drift velocity is given by:

$$ V_d = \frac{eE\tau}{m} $$

where $$E = \frac{V}{L}$$ is the electric field, $$\tau$$ is the relaxation time, and $$m$$ is the electron mass.

When the conductor is replaced by one with the same material and same length but double the cross-section area:

- The voltage $$V$$ and length $$L$$ remain the same, so the electric field $$E = V/L$$ is unchanged.

- The relaxation time $$\tau$$ depends only on the material, which is the same.

Therefore, the drift velocity formula gives the same value:

$$ V_d' = \frac{eE\tau}{m} = V_d $$

The new drift velocity remains $$V_d$$.

Note: While the resistance decreases (halves) and the current increases (doubles), the drift velocity depends on the electric field (not current), which remains unchanged.

$$\frac{R_{AD}}{R_{DB}} = \frac{R}{3R} = \frac{1}{3}$$ ($$D$$ is the junction between $$9R$$ and $$3R$$)

$$\frac{R_{AC}}{R_{CB}} = \frac{2R}{6R} = \frac{1}{3}$$ ($$C$$ is the junction between $$9R$$ and $$2R$$)

Since $$\frac{R_{AD}}{R_{DB}} = \frac{R_{AC}}{R_{CB}} = \frac{1}{3}$$, the Wheatstone bridge is perfectly balanced.

$$R_{\text{top}} = R + 3R = 4R$$

$$R_{\text{bottom}} = 2R + 6R = 8R$$

$$R_{AB} = \frac{R_{\text{top}} \times R_{\text{bottom}}}{R_{\text{top}} + R_{\text{bottom}}}$$

$$R_{AB} = \frac{4R \times 8R}{4R + 8R} = \frac{32R^2}{12R} = \frac{8}{3}R$$

Let each heater filament have resistance $$R$$.

Case 1: Parallel connection

Equivalent resistance: $$R_p = \frac{R}{2}$$

Heat produced: $$H_p = \frac{V^2}{R_p} \times t = \frac{V^2}{R/2} \times t = \frac{2V^2 t}{R}$$

Case 2: Series connection

Equivalent resistance: $$R_s = 2R$$

Heat produced: $$H_s = \frac{V^2}{R_s} \times t = \frac{V^2}{2R} \times t = \frac{V^2 t}{2R}$$

Ratio of heat (parallel to series):

$$\frac{H_p}{H_s} = \frac{2V^2 t/R}{V^2 t/(2R)} = \frac{2}{1/2} = 4$$

The ratio is $$4 : 1$$.

Statement I: "The equivalent resistance of resistors in series is smaller than least resistance used."

This is false. In series, $$R_{eq} = R_1 + R_2 + \ldots$$, which is always GREATER than any individual resistance. (This statement describes parallel combination, not series.)

Statement II: "The resistivity of material is independent of temperature."

This is false. Resistivity changes with temperature (for metals, it increases with temperature; for semiconductors, it decreases).

Both statements are false.

This matches option 1.

The two 10 Ω resistors inside are connected in parallel between the left node and middle node.

The 10 V battery has positive terminal on the right, so:

$$V_B-V_A=10\text{ V}$$

Thus voltage across each parallel resistor is 10 V.

Current through each:

$$I_1=I_2=\frac{10}{10}=1\text{ A}$$

(direction shown right to left, matching arrows)

Now consider the outer loop.

The 20 V battery has positive terminal on the left, so moving left to right across it gives a drop of 20 V20\text{ V}20 V.

Taking left node as 0 V:

• Middle node $$=+10\text{ V}$$
• Right node$$=10-20=-10\text{ V}$$

Voltage across bottom 10 Ω10\,\Omega10Ω resistor:

$$0-(-10)=10\text{ V}$$

Hence,

$$I_3=\frac{10}{10}=1\text{ A}$$

Now,

$$\text{In steady state, branches } AC \text{ and } BD \text{ block DC } \implies I_{AC} = 0, \ I_{BD} = 0$$

$$\text{The remaining active DC path forms a single series loop: } A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C \rightarrow D \rightarrow \text{source}$$

$$R_{\text{total}} = R_{AB} + R_G + R_CD = 6 + 2 + 8 = 16\,\Omega \implies I = \frac{V}{R_{\text{total}}} = \frac{4}{16} = 0.25\text{ A}$$

$$V_{C1} = V_A - V_C = (V_A - V_B) + (V_B - V_C) = I \cdot R_{AB} + I \cdot R_G = 0.25(6) + 0.25(2) = 1.5 + 0.5 = 2\text{ V}$$

$$V_{C2} = V_B - V_D = (V_B - V_C) + (V_C - V_D) = I \cdot R_G + I \cdot R_CD = 0.25(2) + 0.25(8) = 0.5 + 2 = 2.5\text{ V}$$

$$\frac{V_{C1}}{V_{C2}} = \frac{2}{2.5} = \frac{4}{5}$$

Let the potential at the central junction be $$V_x$$.

$$I_{in} = I_{out1} + I_{out2}$$ (KCL)

Current from $$a$$ ($$I_{in}$$): $$\frac{30 - V_x}{10}$$

Current to $$b$$ ($$I_{out1}$$): $$\frac{V_x - 12}{20}$$

Current to $$c$$ ($$I_{out2}$$): $$\frac{V_x - 2}{30}$$

$$\frac{30 - V_x}{10} = \frac{V_x - 12}{20} + \frac{V_x - 2}{30}$$

$$6(30 - V_x) = 3(V_x - 12) + 2(V_x - 2)$$

$$180 - 6V_x = 3V_x - 36 + 2V_x - 4$$

$$V_x = 20\text{ V}$$

Current in $${20\Omega}$$ resistor:

$$I_{20\Omega} = \frac{V_x - V_b}{20}$$

$$I_{20\Omega} = \frac{20 - 12}{20} = \frac{8}{20}$$

$$I_{20\Omega} = 0.4\text{ A}$$

For a wire:

$$R=\rho\frac{L}{A}$$

When the wire is stretched, its volume remains constant:

$$A_1L_1=A_2L_2$$

Given:

$$L_2=5L_1$$

So,

$$A_2=\frac{A_1}{5}$$

Now new resistance:

$$R_2=\rho\frac{5L_1}{A_1/5}$$

$$R_2=25\rho\frac{L_1}{A_1}$$

$$R_2=25R_1$$

$$V_{\text{right}} > V_{\text{left}} \implies D_1, D_3 \text{ forward-biased, } D_2 \text{ reverse-biased}$$

$$I = \frac{10}{20/3}$$

$$I = 1.5 \text{ A}$$

The resistance of a metallic wire is given by:

$$R = \frac{\rho L}{A}$$

where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$L$$ is the length, and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area. We have the length increased by 20%, so the new length is $$1.2L$$, and the area reduced by 4%, so the new area is $$0.96A$$.

Now the new resistance is:

$$R' = \frac{\rho \cdot 1.2L}{0.96A} = \frac{1.2}{0.96} \cdot \frac{\rho L}{A} = 1.25R$$

The percentage change in resistance is:

$$\frac{R' - R}{R} \times 100 = (1.25 - 1) \times 100 = 25\%$$

So, the answer is $$25$$.

$$P = \frac{V^2}{R}$$ and $$R \propto L$$

$$P_1 = \frac{V_0^2}{R}$$

The wire is cut into two equal halves. Since $$R \propto L$$, the resistance of each half becomes $$R' = \frac{R}{2}$$.

$$P_{\text{half}} = \frac{V_0^2}{R/2} = 2 \left( \frac{V_0^2}{R} \right) = 2P_1$$

$$P_2 = P_{\text{half}} + P_{\text{half}} = 2P_1 + 2P_1 = 4P_1$$

$$P_2 : P_1$$ = $$4 : 1$$

$$x = 16$$

Let's use Nodal Analysis to find the currents in the circuit.

1. Set Reference Node:

Let the bottom wire (connected to the negative terminal of the $$2\text{ V}$$ battery and the bottom of the lower $$1\ \Omega$$ resistor) be at potential $$0\text{ V}$$.

2. Determine Fixed Node Potentials:

The top wire connected to the positive terminal of the $$2\text{ V}$$ battery is at potential:

$$$V_{\text{top}} = 2\text{ V}$$$

Let the central junction between the two $$1\ \Omega$$ resistors be node $$C$$ at potential $$V_C$$.

The middle branch has a $$5\text{ V}$$ battery with its positive terminal connected to node $$C$$. Therefore, the left node $$L$$ between the $$5\text{ V}$$ battery and the middle $$1\ \Omega$$ resistor has potential $$V_L = V_C - 5\text{ V}$$.

3. Apply Nodal Analysis at Node C:

The current entering node $$C$$ from the top branch is $$\frac{V_{\text{top}} - V_C}{1} = \frac{2 - V_C}{1}$$.

The current leaving node $$C$$ through the bottom $$1\ \Omega$$ resistor is $$\frac{V_C - 0}{1} = V_C$$.

The current leaving node $$C$$ through the middle branch (towards the left wire) is $$I_2$$.

The left vertical wire connects the top $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor, middle $$1\ \Omega$$ resistor, and bottom $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor. Let the potential of this left vertical wire be $$V_0$$.

Using KCL at the left vertical wire node:

$$$\frac{V_{\text{top}} - V_0}{2} + \frac{V_L - V_0}{1} + \frac{0 - V_0}{2} = 0$$$

$$$\frac{2 - V_0}{2} + (V_C - 5 - V_0) - \frac{V_0}{2} = 0$$$

$$$1 - \frac{V_0}{2} + V_C - 5 - V_0 - \frac{V_0}{2} = 0$$$

$$$V_C - 4 - 2V_0 = 0 \implies V_0 = \frac{V_C - 4}{2}$$$

4. Apply KCL at Node C:

$$$\frac{2 - V_C}{1} = \frac{V_C - 0}{1} + \frac{V_C - (V_0 + 5)}{1}$$$

$$$2 - V_C = V_C + V_C - 5 - V_0$$$

$$$2 - V_C = 2V_C - 5 - \left(\frac{V_C - 4}{2}\right)$$$

Multiply the entire equation by 2:

$$$4 - 2V_C = 4V_C - 10 - V_C + 4$$$

$$$4 - 2V_C = 3V_C - 6$$$

$$$5V_C = 10 \implies V_C = 2\text{ V}$$$

5. Calculate Current $$I_1$$:

The current $$I_1$$ flows upward through the $$2\text{ V}$$ battery. By KCL at the top node ($$V_{\text{top}} = 2\text{ V}$$):

The current flowing into the top $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor is:

$$$I_3 = \frac{V_{\text{top}} - V_0}{2}$$$

Since $$V_C = 2\text{ V}$$, we have $$V_0 = \frac{2 - 4}{2} = -1\text{ V}$$.

$$$I_3 = \frac{2 - (-1)}{2} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5\text{ A}$$$

The current flowing downward through the upper $$1\ \Omega$$ resistor is:

$$$I_{\text{down}} = \frac{V_{\text{top}} - V_C}{1} = \frac{2 - 2}{1} = 0\text{ A}$$$

Therefore, by KCL at the top node:

$$$I_1 = I_3 + I_{\text{down}} = 1.5\text{ A} + 0\text{ A} = 1.5\text{ A}$$$

The magnitude of current $$I_1$$ is 1.5 A (or $$\frac{3}{2}$$ A).

10 resistors each of 10 $$\Omega$$.

Maximum resistance: All in series = $$10 \times 10 = 100$$ $$\Omega$$

Minimum resistance: All in parallel = $$\frac{10}{10} = 1$$ $$\Omega$$

Ratio = $$\frac{100}{1} = 100$$

The ratio is 100.

We need to find the drift velocity of electrons in a wire.

Formula for drift velocity: $$I = nAv_d e$$

where $$I$$ = current, $$n$$ = number density of free electrons, $$A$$ = cross-sectional area, $$v_d$$ = drift velocity, $$e$$ = charge on electron.

Solve for $$v_d$$: $$v_d = \frac{I}{nAe}$$

Convert units and substitute: $$I = 2$$ A, $$n = 2.0 \times 10^{28}$$ m$$^{-3}$$, $$A = 25.0$$ mm$$^2 = 25.0 \times 10^{-6}$$ m$$^2$$, $$e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}$$ C

$$v_d = \frac{2}{2.0 \times 10^{28} \times 25.0 \times 10^{-6} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19}}$$

$$= \frac{2}{2.0 \times 25.0 \times 1.6 \times 10^{28-6-19}}$$

$$= \frac{2}{80 \times 10^{3}} = \frac{2}{8 \times 10^{4}} = 0.25 \times 10^{-4} = 25 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m s}^{-1}$$

The correct answer is 25 $$\times 10^{-6}$$ m s$$^{-1}$$.

$$V_A = 9 \left( \frac{4}{2 + 4} \right)$$

$$V_A = 6$$

$$V_B = 9 \left( \frac{2}{4 + 2} \right)$$

$$V_B = 3$$

$$|V_A - V_B| = 3$$

Solution :

For a potentiometer,

$$\frac{E}{V} = \frac{l_E}{l_V}$$

Also,

$$V = \frac{ER}{R+r}$$

where $$r$$ is the internal resistance of the cell.

Therefore,

$$\frac{E}{V} = \frac{R+r}{R}$$

Hence,

$$\frac{R+r}{R} \propto \frac{1}{l_V}$$

For resistance,

$$R_1 = 5\ \Omega$$

balancing length,

$$l_1 = 200\text{ cm}$$

For resistance,

$$R_2 = 15\ \Omega$$

balancing length,

$$l_2 = 300\text{ cm}$$

Thus,

$$\frac{\frac{5+r}{5}}{\frac{15+r}{15}} = \frac{300}{200}$$

$$\frac{5+r}{5} \times \frac{15}{15+r} = \frac{3}{2}$$

$$\frac{3(5+r)}{15+r} = \frac{3}{2}$$

$$\frac{5+r}{15+r} = \frac{1}{2}$$

$$2(5+r)=15+r$$

$$10+2r=15+r$$

$$r=5\ \Omega$$

Final Answer :

$$5\ \Omega$$

Rectangular parallelepiped: 1 cm × 1 cm × 100 cm = 0.01 m × 0.01 m × 1 m.

Opposite rectangular faces (1 cm × 100 cm = 0.01 × 1 m²): area A = 0.01 m², length = 0.01 m.

$$R = \frac{\rho l}{A} = \frac{3 \times 10^{-7} \times 0.01}{0.01} = 3 \times 10^{-7}$$ Ω.

The answer is 3.

$$R = \rho \frac{L}{A}$$

$$V = A \cdot L$$

$$R = \rho \frac{L^2}{V}$$

A 20% increase in length means the new length is $$L' = 1.2L$$.

$$\frac{R'}{R} = \left(\frac{L'}{L}\right)^2$$

$$\frac{R'}{R} = (1.2)^2 = 1.44$$

$$\% \text{ increase} = (1.44 - 1) \times 100 = 44\%$$

In a potentiometer experiment, the null point length for a cell of EMF $$E_1 = 1.5$$ V is $$l_1 = 60$$ cm. When replaced with another cell of EMF $$E$$, the null point length increases by 40 cm.

So the new null point length is:

$$l_2 = 60 + 40 = 100 \text{ cm}$$

Now, in a potentiometer the EMF is directly proportional to the length of the null point:

$$\frac{E}{E_1} = \frac{l_2}{l_1}$$

$$E = E_1 \times \frac{l_2}{l_1} = 1.5 \times \frac{100}{60} = \frac{150}{60} = 2.5 \text{ V}$$

We are given that $$E = \frac{x}{10}$$ V, so:

$$2.5 = \frac{x}{10} \implies x = 25$$

Hence, the answer is $$25$$.

$$R = \frac{V}{I} \implies R \propto \frac{1}{I}$$

$$R_{100} = R_0(1 + 100\alpha) \implies \frac{2}{1.2} = 1 + 100\alpha \implies 100\alpha = \frac{5}{3} - 1 = \frac{2}{3} \implies \alpha = \frac{2}{300}$$

$$R_{50} = R_0(1 + 50\alpha) \implies \frac{2}{I_{50}} = 1 + 50\left(\frac{2}{300}\right) = 1 + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{4}{3}$$

$$I_{50} = \frac{6}{4} = 1.5\text{ A} = 1500\text{ mA} = 15 \times 10^2\text{ mA}$$

Let the center node be O.

From A to O:

• $$8Ω\ in\ parallel\ with\ 2Ω$$

$$R_{AO}=\frac{8\cdot2}{8+2}=\frac{8}{5}$$

From O to B:

• $$4Ω\ in\ parallel\ with\ 6Ω$$

$$R_{OB}=\frac{4\cdot6}{4+6}=\frac{24}{10}=\frac{12}{5}$$

These are in series:

$$R_{middle}=\frac{8}{5}+\frac{12}{5}=4Ω$$

So middle branch is $$4Ω$$

Now all branches between A and B are parallel:

Top outer branch:

$$1.5+0.5=2\Omega$$

Top horizontal:

$$12Ω$$

Middle branch:

$$4Ω$$

Bottom horizontal:

$$6Ω$$

Bottom outer:

$$1+1=2\Omega$$

So

$$\frac{1}{R_{eq}}=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{12}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{2}$$

LCM 12:

$$\frac{6+1+3+2+6}{12}=\frac{18}{12}=\frac{3}{2}$$

Therefore

$$R_{eq}=\frac{2}{3}$$

We have number density $$n = 8 \times 10^{28}$$ m$$^{-3}$$, area $$A = 2 \times 10^{-6}$$ m$$^2$$, and current $$I = 3.2$$ A.

The relation between current and drift speed is:

$$I = neAv_d$$

Solving for drift speed:

$$v_d = \frac{I}{neA}$$

$$v_d = \frac{3.2}{8 \times 10^{28} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 2 \times 10^{-6}}$$

$$v_d = \frac{3.2}{8 \times 1.6 \times 2 \times 10^{28-19-6}}$$

$$v_d = \frac{3.2}{25.6 \times 10^{3}}$$

$$v_d = \frac{3.2}{25600} = 1.25 \times 10^{-4} \text{ m/s} = 125 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m/s}$$

So, the answer is $$125$$.

We are given a moving coil galvanometer with two configurations: in one case it is used as an ammeter with a shunt resistance, and in the other as a voltmeter with a series resistance.

In the ammeter configuration a shunt resistance of $$S = 5 \; \Omega$$ is connected in parallel, and the full scale deflection corresponds to a total current of $$I = 250 \text{ mA} = 0.25 \text{ A}$$. In the voltmeter configuration a series resistance of $$R = 1050 \; \Omega$$ is connected, and the full scale deflection corresponds to a voltage of $$V = 25 \text{ V}$$.

Let the galvanometer resistance be $$G$$ and the full scale deflection current through the galvanometer be $$I_g$$.

From the voltmeter configuration we have the voltage across the galvanometer and series resistor equal to the applied voltage, so $$ I_g (G + 1050) = 25 $$ and hence $$ I_g = \frac{25}{G + 1050} \quad \cdots (1) $$.

From the ammeter (shunt) configuration the current through the shunt is $$(I - I_g)$$ and the voltage across the galvanometer equals the voltage across the shunt. Thus $$ I_g \cdot G = (I - I_g) \cdot S $$ which becomes $$ I_g \cdot G = (0.25 - I_g) \cdot 5 $$. This leads to $$ I_g (G + 5) = 1.25 $$ and therefore $$ I_g = \frac{1.25}{G + 5} \quad \cdots (2) $$.

Equating the expressions from (1) and (2) gives $$ \frac{25}{G + 1050} = \frac{1.25}{G + 5} $$. Multiplying through yields $$ 25(G + 5) = 1.25(G + 1050) $$, so $$ 25G + 125 = 1.25G + 1312.5 $$, leading to $$ 23.75G = 1187.5 $$. Solving yields $$ G = \frac{1187.5}{23.75} = 50 $$.

Therefore, the resistance of the galvanometer is 50 Ω.

Find the resistance of a hollow cylindrical conductor. The conductor has length $$L = 3.14$$ m, inner diameter 4 mm (radius $$r_i = 2$$ mm = $$2 \times 10^{-3}$$ m), outer diameter 8 mm (radius $$r_o = 4$$ mm = $$4 \times 10^{-3}$$ m), and resistivity $$\rho = 2.4 \times 10^{-8}$$ $$\Omega$$ m.

The cross-sectional area is
$$ A = \pi(r_o^2 - r_i^2) = \pi(16 \times 10^{-6} - 4 \times 10^{-6}) = 12\pi \times 10^{-6}\;\text{m}^2 $$
and the resistance is
$$ R = \frac{\rho L}{A} = \frac{2.4 \times 10^{-8} \times 3.14}{12\pi \times 10^{-6}} = \frac{2.4 \times 10^{-8} \times 3.14}{12 \times 3.14 \times 10^{-6}} = \frac{2.4 \times 10^{-8}}{12 \times 10^{-6}} = 2 \times 10^{-3}\;\Omega $$. Therefore $$n = 2$$.

2

The resistance of a uniform conductor is given by the formula $$R=\dfrac{\rho\,L}{A}$$, where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$L$$ is the length and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the current.

For a hollow cylindrical conductor, the current flows through the annular (ring-shaped) cross-section.

Outer diameter $$=8\text{ mm}=8\times10^{-3}\text{ m}$$, so outer radius $$R_o=4\times10^{-3}\text{ m}$$.
Inner diameter $$=4\text{ mm}=4\times10^{-3}\text{ m}$$, so inner radius $$R_i=2\times10^{-3}\text{ m}$$.

Area of an annulus:
$$A=\pi\!\left(R_o^{\,2}-R_i^{\,2}\right)$$

Substituting the radii:
$$A=\pi\!\left[(4\times10^{-3})^{2}-(2\times10^{-3})^{2}\right]$$
$$=\pi\!\left(16\times10^{-6}-4\times10^{-6}\right)$$
$$=\pi\,(12\times10^{-6})$$
$$=12\pi\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2$$

Given length $$L=3.14\ \text{m}$$ and resistivity $$\rho=2.4\times10^{-8}\ \Omega\!\,\text{m}$$, the resistance is

$$R=\dfrac{\rho\,L}{A} =\dfrac{(2.4\times10^{-8})(3.14)}{12\pi\times10^{-6}}$$

Because $$\pi\approx3.14$$, the factor $$3.14/\pi$$ is approximately $$1$$, so

$$R\approx\dfrac{2.4\times10^{-8}}{12\times10^{-6}} =\dfrac{2.4}{12}\times10^{-2} =0.2\times10^{-2} =2\times10^{-3}\ \Omega$$

Thus $$R = n\times10^{-3}\ \Omega$$ with $$n=2$$.

Answer : $$n = 2$$

The voltmeter reads $$2\text{ V}$$ across the $$5\Omega$$ resistor, which means the potential difference across the entire parallel section is $$2\text{ V}$$

Voltage across the $$2\Omega$$ resistor ($$V_2$$), $$V_2 = V_{total} - V_p = 3\text{ V} - 2\text{ V} = 1\text{ V}$$

Since the $$2\Omega$$ resistor is in series with the rest of the circuit, the total current ($$I$$) flows through it. 

$$I = \frac{V_2}{R_2} = \frac{1\text{ V}}{2\Omega} = 0.5\text{ A}$$

The total current of $$0.5\text{ A}$$ splits between the $$5\Omega$$ resistor and the voltmeter.

$$I_5 = \frac{V_p}{5\Omega} = \frac{2\text{ V}}{5\Omega} = 0.4\text{ A}$$ (Current through the $$5\Omega$$ resistor)

$$I_v = I_{total} - I_5 = 0.5\text{ A} - 0.4\text{ A} = 0.1\text{ A}$$ (Current through the voltmeter)

$$R_v = \frac{V_p}{I_v} = \frac{2\text{ V}}{0.1\text{ A}} = 20\Omega$$

since potential difference between B and D is zero, the bridge is balanced

so we apply:

(left upper)/(left lower) = (right upper)/(right lower)

step 1: simplify each arm

left upper:
6 Ω ∥ 3 Ω = (6×3)/(6+3) = 18/9 = 2 Ω

left lower:
1 Ω + 2 Ω = 3 Ω

right upper:
x Ω ∥ 1 Ω = x/(x+1)

right lower:
x Ω

step 2: apply balance

2 / 3 = [x/(x+1)] / x

step 3: simplify RHS

[x/(x+1)] / x = 1/(x+1)

so:

2/3 = 1/(x+1)

step 4: solve

x + 1 = 3/2
x = 1/2

Let the 6 V cell and the 3 Ω resistor in the left-hand branch constitute loop 1. Let the 3 V cell and the 3 Ω resistor in the right-hand branch constitute loop 2. The upper ends of the two branches are joined by a 3 Ω resistor (the one in which the current is asked).

Assign clockwise loop currents:   • $$i_1$$ flows in loop 1 (through the left 3 Ω resistor and then through the 3 Ω junction resistor from left to right).
  • $$i_2$$ flows in loop 2 (through the right 3 Ω resistor and then through the same junction resistor from right to left).
Hence, through the 3 Ω junction resistor the actual current is $$i_1 - i_2$$ from left to right.

Case 1: KVL in loop 1
Starting from the negative terminal of the 6 V cell and moving clockwise, the potential rises by 6 V and then drops across the two resistors:
$$6 - 3\,i_1 - 3\,(i_1 - i_2) = 0$$

Simplifying, $$6 - 3i_1 - 3i_1 + 3i_2 = 0$$ $$6 - 6i_1 + 3i_2 = 0$$ Divide by 3: $$2 - 2i_1 + i_2 = 0 \qquad -(1)$$

Case 2: KVL in loop 2
Going clockwise round loop 2 gives a rise of 3 V (the 3 V cell) followed by drops across its two resistors:
$$3 - 3\,i_2 - 3\,(i_2 - i_1) = 0$$

Simplifying, $$3 - 3i_2 - 3i_2 + 3i_1 = 0$$ $$3 + 3i_1 - 6i_2 = 0$$ Divide by 3: $$1 + i_1 - 2i_2 = 0 \qquad -(2)$$

Solving equations (1) and (2)
From $$(1):\; i_2 = 2i_1 - 2$$

Substitute this $$i_2$$ in $$(2):$$ $$1 + i_1 - 2(2i_1 - 2) = 0$$ $$1 + i_1 - 4i_1 + 4 = 0$$ $$5 - 3i_1 = 0$$ $$i_1 = \frac{5}{3}\,\text{A}$$

Now, $$i_2 = 2\left(\frac{5}{3}\right) - 2 = \frac{10}{3} - \frac{6}{3} = \frac{4}{3}\,\text{A}$$

Current through the 3 Ω junction resistor
$$i = i_1 - i_2 = \frac{5}{3} - \frac{4}{3} = \frac{1}{3}\,\text{A}$$

The current is given in the question as $$\dfrac{x}{3}\,\text{A}$$. Comparing, $$x = 1$$.

Therefore, the required value of $$x$$ is 1.

The vertical wire connected at the far right of the circuit acts as an ideal short circuit. This wire provides a path of zero resistance, effectively bypassing the two $$4\text{ }\Omega$$ resistors and the rightmost vertical $$2\text{ }\Omega$$ resistor. Consequently, the equivalent resistance of this entire section is $$0\text{ }\Omega$$.

Moving left, the horizontal $$2\text{ }\Omega$$ resistor is connected in series with the previously identified shorted section ($$0\text{ }\Omega$$):

$$R_{\text{series}} = 2\text{ }\Omega + 0\text{ }\Omega = 2\text{ }\Omega$$

This $$2\text{ }\Omega$$ equivalent branch is in parallel with the first vertical $$2\text{ }\Omega$$ resistor. The equivalent resistance ($$R_{p}$$) for this part is: $$R_{p} = \frac{2\text{ }\Omega \times 2\text{ }\Omega}{2\text{ }\Omega + 2\text{ }\Omega} = 1\text{ }\Omega$$

The circuit now reduces to three components in series between terminals A and B: the $$3\text{ }\Omega$$ top resistor, the $$1\text{ }\Omega$$ equivalent middle network, and the $$6\text{ }\Omega$$ bottom resistor.

$$R_{AB} = 3\text{ }\Omega + 1\text{ }\Omega + 6\text{ }\Omega$$

$$R_{AB} = 10\text{ }\Omega$$

step 1: combine the two cells in parallel (proper way)

For parallel cells:

$$E_{eq}=\frac{\frac{E_1}{r_1}+\frac{E_2}{r_2}}{\frac{1}{r_1}+\frac{1}{r_2}}$$

But here, from polarity:

• one contributes +12/3
• the other contributes −6/6 (opposing direction)

So:

$$E_{eq}=\frac{12/3-6/6}{1/3+1/6}=\frac{4-1}{1/2}=\frac{3}{1/2}=6\text{ V}$$

step 2: equivalent internal resistance

$$r_{eq}=3∥6=2Ω$$

step 3: final circuit

Now it becomes:

6 V source in series with 2 Ω and external 4 Ω

Total resistance:

Rtotal=2+4=6 Ω

step 4: current

$$I=\frac{6}{6}=1A$$

Two identical cells in series: Total EMF = $$2 \times 1.5 = 3$$ V, total internal resistance = $$2r$$.

The voltmeter reads 1.5 V across the 10 Ω resistance.

Current through the circuit:

$$I = \frac{V}{R} = \frac{1.5}{10} = 0.15 \text{ A}$$

Also, using Ohm's law for the full circuit:

$$I = \frac{\text{Total EMF}}{R + 2r} = \frac{3}{10 + 2r}$$

Equating: $$0.15 = \frac{3}{10 + 2r}$$

$$10 + 2r = 20$$

$$2r = 10$$

$$r = 5 \text{ Ω}$$

Solution :

Let emf of each cell be $$E$$ and internal resistance be $$r$$.

When cells are connected in series :

Equivalent emf,

$$E_s = 2E$$

Equivalent internal resistance,

$$r_s = 2r$$

Current through external resistance $$R = 5\ \Omega$$ :

$$I_s = \frac{2E}{5+2r}$$

When cells are connected in parallel :

Equivalent emf,

$$E_p = E$$

Equivalent internal resistance,

$$r_p = \frac{r}{2}$$

Current :

$$I_p = \frac{E}{5+\frac{r}{2}}$$

Given currents are equal :

$$\frac{2E}{5+2r} = \frac{E}{5+\frac{r}{2}}$$

Cancelling $$E$$ :

$$\frac{2}{5+2r} = \frac{1}{5+\frac{r}{2}}$$

Cross multiplying :

$$2\left(5+\frac{r}{2}\right) = 5+2r$$

$$10+r = 5+2r$$

$$r = 5\ \Omega$$

Final Answer :

$$5\ \Omega$$

We have a metre bridge with $$R_1 = 2 \Omega$$ and $$R_2 = 3 \Omega$$. At balance:

$$\frac{l}{100 - l} = \frac{R_1}{R_2} = \frac{2}{3}$$

Solving, $$3l = 200 - 2l$$, which gives $$5l = 200$$, so $$l = 40$$ cm.

Now, a shunt resistance $$X$$ is added in parallel with the $$3 \Omega$$ resistor, and the balance point shifts by $$22.5$$ cm. Since adding a shunt decreases the effective resistance, the balance point shifts toward the $$3 \Omega$$ side, giving a new balance point $$l' = 40 + 22.5 = 62.5$$ cm.

The effective resistance with the shunt is $$R_2' = \frac{3X}{3 + X}$$. At the new balance point:

$$\frac{62.5}{37.5} = \frac{2}{R_2'}$$

So $$R_2' = \frac{2 \times 37.5}{62.5} = \frac{75}{62.5} = 1.2 \Omega$$.

Now we solve for $$X$$:

$$\frac{3X}{3 + X} = 1.2$$

$$3X = 3.6 + 1.2X$$

$$1.8X = 3.6$$

$$X = 2 \Omega$$

So, the answer is $$2$$.

Two resistances $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ are tested using a meter bridge in two configurations.

Case 1: Series configuration.

$$R_1 + R_2$$ in left gap, $$10 \Omega$$ in right gap. Null point at 60 cm.

$$\frac{R_1 + R_2}{10} = \frac{60}{40} = \frac{3}{2}$$

$$R_1 + R_2 = 15 \Omega$$ ... (i)

Case 2: Parallel configuration.

$$\frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2}$$ in left gap, $$3 \Omega$$ in right gap. Null point at 40 cm.

$$\frac{R_1 R_2/(R_1 + R_2)}{3} = \frac{40}{60} = \frac{2}{3}$$

$$\frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2} = 2 \Omega$$ ... (ii)

Finding $$R_1 R_2$$:

From (i) and (ii):

$$R_1 R_2 = 2 \times (R_1 + R_2) = 2 \times 15 = 30 \Omega^2$$

The product $$R_1 R_2 = \boxed{30} \Omega^2$$.

A galvanometer of resistance $$G$$ is converted to an ammeter by connecting a shunt resistance $$S$$ in parallel. The figure of merit $$K$$, defined as the current per division, implies that when the galvanometer shows $$n$$ divisions the current through it is $$I_g = nK$$.

Since the galvanometer and the shunt are in parallel, the potential difference across them is the same. Therefore $$I_g \cdot G = I_s \cdot S$$, where $$I_s$$ is the current through the shunt. The total current is $$I = I_g + I_s$$ which becomes $$I_g + \frac{I_g \cdot G}{S} = I_g\left(1 + \frac{G}{S}\right) = I_g \cdot \frac{G + S}{S}$$.

Substituting $$I_g = nK$$ into this expression gives

$$I = \frac{nK(G + S)}{S}$$

Hence the required option is D.

A wire of resistance $$R_1$$ is drawn out so that its length increases by twice its original length. We need to find the ratio of new resistance to original resistance.

The length is increased by twice the original length, meaning the new length is:

$$L' = L + 2L = 3L$$

When a wire is drawn out, its volume remains constant:

$$A \cdot L = A' \cdot L'$$

$$A' = \frac{AL}{3L} = \frac{A}{3}$$

Resistance $$R = \frac{\rho L}{A}$$

Original resistance: $$R_1 = \frac{\rho L}{A}$$

New resistance: $$R_2 = \frac{\rho \cdot 3L}{A/3} = \frac{9\rho L}{A} = 9R_1$$

$$\frac{R_2}{R_1} = \frac{9}{1}$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option A: 9 : 1.

An aluminium wire is stretched to make its length $$0.4\%$$ larger and we wish to determine the resulting percentage change in its resistance.

The resistance of the wire is given by $$R = \frac{\rho l}{A}$$ where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$l$$ is the length, and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area.

Since the volume of the wire remains constant during stretching, we have $$V = A\,l = \text{constant}$$ which implies $$A = \frac{V}{l}\,.$$

Substituting this expression for $$A$$ into the resistance formula yields $$R = \frac{\rho\,l}{A} = \frac{\rho\,l^2}{V}$$ so that $$R\propto l^2$$ when $$\rho$$ and $$V$$ are constant.

Taking differentials then gives $$\frac{\Delta R}{R} = 2\,\frac{\Delta l}{l}\,. $$ Since the length increases by $$0.4\%$$, we obtain $$\frac{\Delta R}{R} = 2 \times 0.4\% = 0.8\% \,. $$

Therefore, the percentage change in resistance is $$0.8\%$$, and the correct answer is Option C.

The central part of the circuit is a Wheatstone Bridge ($$\frac{3}{3} = \frac{6}{6}$$)

Removing the central $$5\text{ }\Omega$$ resistor leaves us with two parallel branches:

Top branch: Two $$3\text{ }\Omega$$ resistors in series $$\implies R_{\text{top}} = 3 + 3 = 6\text{ }\Omega$$

Bottom branch: Two $$6\text{ }\Omega$$ resistors in series $$\implies R_{\text{bottom}} = 6 + 6 = 12\text{ }\Omega$$

$$R_{\text{bridge}} = \frac{6 \times 12}{6 + 12} = \frac{72}{18} = 4\text{ }\Omega$$

$$R_{\text{total}} = R_{\text{bridge}} + 2\text{ }\Omega = 4 + 2 = 6\text{ }\Omega$$

$$I = \frac{6\text{ V}}{6\text{ }\Omega} = \mathbf{1\text{ A}}$$

Step 1: Loop APQ

• Series: 5+5=10 Ω
• Parallel with 10 Ω

$$R_{AQ}​=\ \frac{\ 10\cdot10}{10\ +\ 10}​=5Ω$$

Step 2: Loop AQR

• Series: 5+5=10 Ω
• Parallel with 10 Ω

$$R_{AR}​=\ \frac{\ 10\cdot10}{10\ +\ 10}​=5Ω$$

Step 3: Loop ARS

• Series: 5+5=10 Ω
• Parallel with 10 Ω

$$R_{AS}​=\ \frac{\ 10\cdot10}{10\ +\ 10}​=5Ω$$

Step 4: Section ASB

• Series: 5+5=10 Ω
• Parallel with 10 Ω1

$$R_{AB}=\ \frac{\ 10\cdot10}{10\ +\ 10}​=5Ω$$

Final Answer:

RAB​=5Ω​

We have the Assertion that alloys such as constantan and manganin are used in making standard resistance coils, and the Reason that these alloys have a very small value of temperature coefficient of resistance.

The assertion is true because constantan and manganin are indeed the preferred materials for standard resistance coils used in precision instruments like Wheatstone bridges and potentiometers.

The reason is also true: these alloys have extremely low temperature coefficients of resistance (of the order of $$10^{-5}$$ per °C), which means their resistance remains nearly constant over a wide range of temperatures.

Now, the reason correctly explains the assertion, because the primary requirement for a standard resistance coil is that its resistance should not change appreciably with temperature. Since constantan and manganin satisfy this requirement owing to their very small temperature coefficient of resistance, R is indeed the correct explanation for A.

Hence, the correct answer is Option 1.

Given: Galvanometer resistance $$G = 72 \;\Omega$$ and shunt resistance $$S = 8 \;\Omega$$.

When a shunt is connected in parallel with the galvanometer, the total current $$I$$ splits between the galvanometer and the shunt.

Since the galvanometer and shunt are in parallel, the voltage across both is the same:

$$I_g \times G = I_s \times S$$

where $$I_g$$ is the current through the galvanometer and $$I_s$$ is the current through the shunt.

Also, $$I = I_g + I_s$$, so $$I_s = I - I_g$$.

$$I_g \times 72 = (I - I_g) \times 8$$

$$72 I_g = 8I - 8I_g$$

$$80 I_g = 8I$$

$$\frac{I_g}{I} = \frac{8}{80} = \frac{1}{10}$$

The percentage of total current through the galvanometer:

$$\frac{I_g}{I} \times 100 = \frac{1}{10} \times 100 = 10\%$$

The correct answer is Option B.

Two identical cells provide the same current through $$R = 2\,\Omega$$ whether connected in series or parallel. Find the internal resistance of each cell.

EMF = $$2E$$, internal resistance = $$2r$$:

$$I_s = \frac{2E}{R + 2r} = \frac{2E}{2 + 2r}$$

EMF = $$E$$, internal resistance = $$r/2$$:

$$I_p = \frac{E}{R + r/2} = \frac{E}{2 + r/2}$$

$$\frac{2E}{2 + 2r} = \frac{E}{2 + r/2}$$

$$\frac{2}{2 + 2r} = \frac{1}{2 + r/2}$$

$$2(2 + r/2) = 2 + 2r$$

$$4 + r = 2 + 2r$$

$$r = 2\,\Omega$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option A: 2 $$\Omega$$.

Two coils produce the same amount of heat when connected separately to a voltage source $$V$$, taking 20 minutes and 60 minutes respectively. The heat generated by a coil of resistance $$R$$ in time $$t$$ is given by $$H = \frac{V^2}{R} \times t$$, and since both coils produce the same heat, we have

$$\frac{V^2}{R_1} \times 20 = \frac{V^2}{R_2} \times 60$$

which simplifies to

$$\frac{20}{R_1} = \frac{60}{R_2}$$

and hence

$$R_2 = 3R_1\,. $$

When these two coils are connected in parallel, the equivalent resistance $$R_{eq}$$ satisfies

$$\frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{3R_1} = \frac{4}{3R_1}$$

so that

$$R_{eq} = \frac{3R_1}{4}\,. $$

To produce the same heat $$H$$ with this parallel combination, we write

$$H = \frac{V^2}{R_{eq}} \times t$$

and use the fact that $$H = \frac{V^2}{R_1} \times 20$$, giving

$$\frac{V^2}{R_1} \times 20 = \frac{V^2}{\frac{3R_1}{4}} \times t$$

which leads to

$$\frac{20}{R_1} = \frac{4t}{3R_1}\,,\quad 20 = \frac{4t}{3}\,,\quad t = 15 \text{ min}\,. $$

Hence, the time required is 15 minutes.

A cell with internal resistance r is balanced using a potentiometer. When shunted by 8 Ω, the balancing length is some value, and when shunted by 4 Ω, the balancing length is 2 m (out of total 3 m wire).

When a cell of EMF E and internal resistance r is shunted by resistance S, the terminal voltage is:

$$V = \frac{ES}{r + S}$$

The balancing length is proportional to the terminal voltage; let k be the potential gradient. For a shunt of $$S_1 = 8$$ Ω with balancing length $$l_1$$, we have

$$\frac{8E}{r + 8} = k \cdot l_1$$

For a shunt of $$S_2 = 4$$ Ω with balancing length $$l_2 = 2$$ m, it follows that

$$\frac{4E}{r + 4} = k \cdot 2$$

Since the balancing length for the 8 Ω shunt spans the entire 3 m potentiometer wire (a higher shunt resistance yields a higher terminal voltage, requiring the full length),

$$\frac{8E}{r + 8} = k \cdot 3$$

Dividing the equation for the 8 Ω shunt by that for the 4 Ω shunt gives

$$\frac{8E/(r+8)}{4E/(r+4)} = \frac{3}{2}$$

This ratio simplifies as follows:

$$\frac{8(r+4)}{4(r+8)} = \frac{3}{2}$$

$$\frac{2(r+4)}{r+8} = \frac{3}{2}$$

$$4(r+4) = 3(r+8)$$

$$4r + 16 = 3r + 24$$

$$r = 8 \text{ } \Omega$$

The internal resistance of the cell is 8 Ω.

given:
balancing length from A = 43 cm
end correction at A = +2 cm

so corrected length near A:
l₁ = 43 + 2 = 45 cm

remaining length:
l₂ = 100 − 43 = 57 cm

meter bridge condition:

$$\frac{R}{15}=\frac{l_2}{l_1}$$

$$\frac{R}{15}=\frac{57}{45}$$

solve:

$$R=15\times\frac{57}{45}=19Ω$$

We are given the length of the potentiometer wire $$L = 300 \text{ cm}$$, an external resistance $$R = 780 \, \Omega$$, the EMF of a standard cell $$E = 4 \text{ V}$$, and the EMF of a test cell $$e = 20 \text{ mV} = 0.02 \text{ V}$$, with the null point occurring at a length $$l = 60 \text{ cm}$$. Let the resistance of the potentiometer wire be $$R_w \, \Omega$$.

Since the potentiometer wire and external resistor are in series with the standard cell, the current through the wire is $$I = \frac{E}{R + R_w} = \frac{4}{780 + R_w}$$.

Subsequently, the potential drop across the entire wire is $$V = I R_w$$, so the potential gradient along the wire is $$\frac{I R_w}{L} = \frac{I R_w}{300}$$.

At the null point, the EMF of the test cell equals the potential drop across the length $$l$$ of the wire. Therefore, $$e = \frac{I R_w}{300} \times l$$. Substituting $$l = 60$$ yields $$0.02 = \frac{I R_w \times 60}{300} = \frac{I R_w}{5}$$, which gives $$I R_w = 0.1 \text{ V}$$.

Substituting $$I = \frac{4}{780 + R_w}$$ into $$I R_w = 0.1$$ leads to $$\frac{4 R_w}{780 + R_w} = 0.1$$. This gives $$4R_w = 0.1(780 + R_w) = 78 + 0.1R_w$$, so $$3.9R_w = 78$$ and hence $$R_w = \frac{78}{3.9} = 20 \, \Omega$$.

Therefore, the resistance of the potentiometer wire is $$\textbf{20} \, \Omega$$.

In a meter bridge, the balance condition is:

$$\dfrac{P}{Q} = \dfrac{l}{100 - l}$$

We start by finding the ratio $$P/Q$$ from the initial balance point where the balancing length is $$l_1 = 40 \text{ cm}$$. Substituting into the balance condition gives

$$\dfrac{P}{Q} = \dfrac{40}{100 - 40} = \dfrac{40}{60} = \dfrac{2}{3}$$

This implies $$P = \dfrac{2Q}{3}$$ ...(i)

Next, when an unknown resistance $$x$$ is connected in series with $$P$$, the new balance length becomes $$l_2 = 80 \text{ cm}$$. Applying the same condition yields

$$\dfrac{P + x}{Q} = \dfrac{80}{100 - 80} = \dfrac{80}{20} = 4$$

Hence, $$P + x = 4Q$$ ...(ii)

Substituting equation (i) into equation (ii) gives

$$\dfrac{2Q}{3} + x = 4Q$$

Therefore,

$$x = 4Q - \dfrac{2Q}{3} = \dfrac{12Q - 2Q}{3} = \dfrac{10Q}{3}$$

Since $$Q = 6 \text{ }\Omega$$ (standard value given in the circuit), it follows that

$$x = \dfrac{10 \times 6}{3} = 20 \text{ }\Omega$$

Therefore, the value of $$x$$ is 20 $$\Omega$$.

Since the current density in the cylindrical wire is uniform, $$J=1.0\times10^6A/m^2$$, and the radius of the wire is $$r = 4.0$$ mm $$= 4.0 \times 10^{-3}$$ m, we need to find the current through the outer portion between $$\frac{r}{2}$$ and $$r$$.

For a uniform current density, the current through an annular region between radii $$r_1$$ and $$r_2$$ is given by

$$I = J \times A = J \times \pi(r_2^2 - r_1^2)$$

Here $$r_1 = \frac{r}{2} = 2.0 \times 10^{-3}$$ m and $$r_2 = r = 4.0 \times 10^{-3}$$ m. Using these values, the area of the outer portion becomes

$$A = \pi(r^2 - (r/2)^2) = \pi\left(r^2 - \frac{r^2}{4}\right) = \pi \times \frac{3r^2}{4}$$

Substituting $$r = 4.0 \times 10^{-3}$$ m gives

$$A = \frac{3\pi}{4} \times (4.0 \times 10^{-3})^2 = \frac{3\pi}{4} \times 16 \times 10^{-6} = 12\pi \times 10^{-6} \text{ m}^2$$

Therefore, the current through this region is

$$I = J \times A = 1.0 \times 10^6 \times 12\pi \times 10^{-6} = 12\pi \text{ A}$$

Comparing this with $$x\pi$$ A yields $$x = 12$$.

The answer is $$\boxed{12}$$.

We have two bulbs connected in series: Bulb 1 rated at 220 V, 100 W and Bulb 2 rated at 220 V, 60 W. The total voltage across the combination is 220 V.

The resistance of each bulb is found from its rating. For Bulb 1, $$R_1 = \frac{V^2}{P_1} = \frac{220^2}{100} = \frac{48400}{100} = 484 \; \Omega$$. For Bulb 2, $$R_2 = \frac{V^2}{P_2} = \frac{220^2}{60} = \frac{48400}{60} = \frac{2420}{3} \; \Omega$$.

Since the bulbs are in series, the total resistance is $$R = R_1 + R_2 = 484 + \frac{2420}{3} = \frac{1452 + 2420}{3} = \frac{3872}{3} \; \Omega$$.

The current through the series combination is $$I = \frac{V}{R} = \frac{220}{\frac{3872}{3}} = \frac{660}{3872} \text{ A}$$.

The power consumed by Bulb 1 (the 100 W bulb) is $$P = I^2 R_1 = \left(\frac{660}{3872}\right)^2 \times 484$$.

Now, $$\frac{660}{3872} = \frac{165}{968}$$, so $$I^2 = \frac{165^2}{968^2} = \frac{27225}{937024}$$.

Therefore, $$P = \frac{27225 \times 484}{937024} = \frac{13176900}{937024} \approx 14.06 \text{ W}$$.

Hence, the power consumed by the 100 W bulb is about $$\textbf{14}$$ W.

We need to determine the output voltage $$V_0$$ for the given parallel combination of practical voltage sources (batteries with internal resistances).

1. Identify the Circuit Parameters

From the circuit diagram,we have three branches connected in parallel to the common output node $$V_0$$:

• Branch 1: Voltage $$E_1 = 2\text{ V}$$, Resistance $$r_1 = 1\text{ k}\Omega$$
• Branch 2: Voltage $$E_2 = 4\text{ V}$$, Resistance $$r_2 = 1\text{ k}\Omega$$
• Branch 3: Voltage $$E_3 = 6\text{ V}$$, Resistance $$r_3 = 1\text{ k}\Omega$$

All the negative terminals of the batteries are tied together to the ground ($$0\text{ V}$$).

2. Apply Millman's Theorem

Millman's Theorem states that when multiple voltage sources are connected in parallel, the equivalent voltage ($$V_0$$) across the common terminals is given by:

$$V_0 = \frac{\frac{E_1}{r_1} + \frac{E_2}{r_2} + \frac{E_3}{r_3}}{\frac{1}{r_1} + \frac{1}{r_2} + \frac{1}{r_3}}$$

Since all the internal resistances are equal ($$r_1 = r_2 = r_3 = 1\text{ k}\Omega$$), the expression simplifies directly to the arithmetic mean of the voltages:

$$V_0 = \frac{\frac{2}{1} + \frac{4}{1} + \frac{6}{1}}{\frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1}}$$

$$V_0 = \frac{2 + 4 + 6}{1 + 1 + 1}$$

$$V_0 = \frac{12}{3} = 4\text{ V}$$

Conclusion

The value of $$V_0$$ is 4 V.

We need to find the current through the outer portion of a cylindrical wire between radial distances R/2 and R, where R = 4 mm and the current density J = $$4 \times 10^6$$ A/m². Because the current density is uniform, the total current is given by $$I = J \times A$$, where A is the area of the annular region between R/2 and R.

To determine this area, note that $$A = \pi R^2 - \pi \left(\frac{R}{2}\right)^2 = \pi R^2 - \frac{\pi R^2}{4} = \frac{3\pi R^2}{4}$$.

Here, $$R = 4 \text{ mm} = 4 \times 10^{-3} \text{ m}$$. Substituting into the expression for the current gives

$$I = J \times \frac{3\pi R^2}{4} = 4 \times 10^6 \times \frac{3\pi \times (4 \times 10^{-3})^2}{4}$$

$$I = 4 \times 10^6 \times \frac{3\pi \times 16 \times 10^{-6}}{4}$$

$$I = 4 \times 10^6 \times 12\pi \times 10^{-6}$$

$$I = 48\pi \text{ A}$$

The current through the outer portion is 48$$\pi$$ A.

The resistance of a wire is given by:

$$R_{\text{wire}} = \dfrac{\rho l}{A} = \dfrac{\rho l}{\pi (d/2)^2} = \dfrac{4\rho l}{\pi d^2}$$

Each wire has length $$l$$ and diameter $$d$$, so its resistance is

$$R_1 = \dfrac{4\rho l}{\pi d^2}$$

When eight such wires are connected in parallel, the equivalent resistance becomes

$$R = \dfrac{R_1}{8} = \dfrac{4\rho l}{8\pi d^2} = \dfrac{\rho l}{2\pi d^2}$$

Now consider a single wire of length $$2l$$ and diameter $$D$$ having the same resistance $$R$$. Its resistance is given by

$$R = \dfrac{4\rho (2l)}{\pi D^2} = \dfrac{8\rho l}{\pi D^2}$$

Equating the two expressions for $$R$$ yields

$$\dfrac{\rho l}{2\pi d^2} = \dfrac{8\rho l}{\pi D^2}$$

which simplifies to

$$\dfrac{1}{2d^2} = \dfrac{8}{D^2}$$

and hence

$$D^2 = 16d^2$$

$$D = 4d$$

Therefore, the diameter of the single wire is $$\boxed{4}d$$.

Case 1 : When $$S_1$$ and $$S_2$$ are open

$$(R_{eq})_1 = 1 + \frac{5 \times \frac{1}{2}}{5 + \frac{1}{2}} = 1 + \frac{5}{11} = \frac{16}{11}$$

$$P_1 = \frac{V^2}{(R_{eq})_1} = \frac{(6)^2}{\frac{16}{11}} = \frac{36 \times 11}{16} = 24.75\text{ W}$$

$$(R_{eq})_2 = \frac{6}{11}\ \Omega$$

$$P_2 = \frac{V^2}{(R_{eq})_2} = \frac{(6)^2}{\frac{6}{11}} = \frac{36 \times 11}{6} = 66\text{ W}$$

$$P_2 > P_1$$

Option (A) is correct.

Case 2 : If $$\text{I} = 2\text{ A}$$ source is used in both circuits, then

$$P_1 = i^2(R_{eq})_1 = (2)^2 \times \frac{16}{11} = \frac{64}{11} = 5.818\text{ W}$$

$$P_2 = i^2(R_{eq})_2 = (2)^2 \times \frac{6}{11} = \frac{24}{11} = 2.1818\text{ W}$$

$$P_1 > P_2$$

Option (B) is correct.

Case 3 : For $$Q_1$$

$$R_{eq} = \frac{5}{11}\ \Omega$$

$$Q_1 = \frac{V^2}{R_{eq}} = \frac{(6)^2}{\frac{5}{11}} = \frac{36 \times 11}{5} = 79.2\text{ W}$$

$$P_1 = 24.75\text{ W}$$

$$Q_1 > P_1$$

Option (C) is correct.

Case 4 : For option (D)

$$Q_1 = i^2R_{eq} = (2)^2 \times \frac{5}{11} = \frac{20}{11} = 1.81\text{ W}$$

$$Q_2 = i^2R_{eq} = (2)^2 \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{4}{2} = 2\text{ W}$$

$$Q_2 > Q_1$$

Option (D) is incorrect.

For loop 1:

$$-\frac{1}{2}x - \frac{1}{2}(x + y) - x + 6 = 0$$

$$\Rightarrow -2x - \frac{y}{2} = -6$$

$$\Rightarrow -4x - y = -12$$

$$\Rightarrow 4x + y = 12 \dots \dots \dots (1)$$

For loop 2:

$$\frac{1}{2}y + 1y + 12 + \frac{1}{2}(x + y) = 0$$

$$\Rightarrow \frac{3}{2}y + \frac{y}{2} + \frac{x}{2} = -12$$

$$\Rightarrow 2y + \frac{x}{2} = -12$$

$$\Rightarrow 4y + x = -24$$

$$\Rightarrow 4y + x - 16x - 4y = -24 - 48$$

$$\Rightarrow -15x = -72$$ $$\Rightarrow x = \frac{72}{15}$$

$$\Rightarrow 4\left(\frac{72}{15}\right) + y = 12$$

$$\Rightarrow y = 12 - \frac{288}{15}$$

$$= \frac{180 - 288}{15}$$

$$= \frac{-108}{15} = -7.2\text{ A}$$

Current in $$R_1 = 7.2\text{ A}$$

Current in $$R_2 = \frac{x+y}{2} = \left(\frac{72}{15} - \frac{108}{15}\right) \frac{1}{2}$$

$$= \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{-36}{15}\right) = \frac{-2.4}{2}\text{ A}$$ $$= -1.2\text{ A}$$

Current in $$R_3 = x = 4.8\text{ A}$$

Current in $$R_4 = \frac{1}{2}x = 2.4\text{ A}$$

We need to determine the relation between galvanometer resistance $$G$$ and shunt resistance $$S$$ when using the $$\frac{1}{3}$$ deflection method.

In this method, the full deflection $$\theta$$ is first noted when the galvanometer is connected to a battery through a high resistance. Then a shunt $$S$$ is connected across the galvanometer and adjusted until the deflection reduces to $$\theta/3$$. Since deflection is proportional to the galvanometer current, reducing deflection to $$\theta/3$$ means the current becomes $$I_g/3$$, where $$I_g$$ is the original current. The total current $$I$$ from the source remains approximately $$I_g$$, assuming the series resistance is much larger than both $$G$$ and $$S$$.

Under these conditions, the current through the shunt is $$I_g - I_g/3 = 2I_g/3$$, and the voltage across both branches must be equal, so

$$G \times \frac{I_g}{3} = S \times \frac{2I_g}{3}$$

Solving for $$G$$ gives $$G = \frac{S \times \frac{2I_g}{3}}{\frac{I_g}{3}} = 2S$$, showing that the galvanometer resistance is twice the shunt resistance.

The correct answer is Option B: $$\frac{1}{3}$$ deflection method can be used and in this case $$G$$ equals twice the value of the shunt resistance.

The resistance of a wire is given by $$R = \frac{\rho L}{A}$$, where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$L$$ is the length, and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area. When the wire is stretched, its volume remains constant, so $$LA = L'A'$$.

The original length is $$L = 1$$ m and the original resistance is $$R = 1 \, \Omega$$. After stretching, the new length is $$L' = 1.25L = 1.25$$ m. Since volume is conserved, $$A' = \frac{LA}{L'} = \frac{A}{1.25}$$.

The new resistance is $$R' = \frac{\rho L'}{A'} = \frac{\rho (1.25L)}{A/1.25} = \rho \frac{L}{A} \times (1.25)^2 = R \times 1.5625 = 1.5625 \, \Omega$$.

The percentage change in resistance is $$\frac{R' - R}{R} \times 100 = \frac{1.5625 - 1}{1} \times 100 = 56.25\%$$, which to the nearest integer is $$56\%$$.

The thermal energy developed in a resistor is given by $$H = I^2 R t$$, where $$I$$ is the current, $$R$$ is the resistance, and $$t$$ is the time.

From the first case, $$500 = (1.5)^2 \times R \times 20 = 2.25 \times 20R = 45R$$. Solving for resistance: $$R = \frac{500}{45} = \frac{100}{9}$$ $$\Omega$$.

When the current is increased to $$3$$ A, the energy developed in $$20$$ s is $$H_2 = (3)^2 \times \frac{100}{9} \times 20 = 9 \times \frac{100}{9} \times 20 = 100 \times 20 = 2000$$ J.

Alternatively, since $$H \propto I^2$$ (with $$R$$ and $$t$$ unchanged), $$\frac{H_2}{H_1} = \frac{(3)^2}{(1.5)^2} = \frac{9}{2.25} = 4$$, giving $$H_2 = 4 \times 500 = 2000$$ J.

$$\frac{1}{R_{\text{eq}}} = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{12} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{8}$$

$$\frac{1}{R_{\text{eq}}} = \frac{6 + 2 + 4 + 3}{24} = \frac{15}{24} \implies R_{\text{eq}} = 1.6\ \Omega$$

$$R_{\text{total}} = R_{\text{eq}} + r = 1.6 + 0.6 = 2.2\ \Omega$$

$$P = \frac{E^2}{R_{\text{total}}} = \frac{(2.2)^2}{2.2} = 2.2\text{ W}$$

We have a galvanometer of unknown resistance $$G$$ connected in parallel with a shunt resistance $$S = 5\;\Omega$$. Both elements share the same potential difference because they are in parallel. Let the total current entering the parallel combination be $$I$$. According to the statement, only 2 % of this total current flows through the galvanometer.

Hence the current through the galvanometer is $$I_g = 0.02\,I$$ and the current through the shunt is $$I_s = I - I_g = I - 0.02\,I = 0.98\,I$$.

For two resistors in parallel, the potential drops are equal, so we write the condition

$$I_g\,G = I_s\,S.$$

Substituting the expressions for $$I_g$$ and $$I_s$$ we get

$$0.02\,I \, G = 0.98\,I \, S.$$

We can cancel the common factor $$I$$ from both sides, giving

$$0.02\,G = 0.98\,S.$$

Now we isolate $$G$$ by dividing both sides by $$0.02$$:

$$G = \frac{0.98}{0.02}\,S.$$

Next we calculate the numerical ratio:

$$\frac{0.98}{0.02} = \frac{98}{2} = 49.$$

So we obtain

$$G = 49\,S.$$

Substituting the given value of the shunt resistance $$S = 5\;\Omega$$, we have

$$G = 49 \times 5\;\Omega = 245\;\Omega.$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option A.

We start by recalling the resistance formula for a uniform wire:

$$R=\rho\frac{L}{A}$$

where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$L$$ is the length and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area.

The two wires (iron and copper-nickel alloy) have

diameter $$d = 2\ \text{mm}=0.2\ \text{cm}\;,$$

so the radius is

$$r=\frac{d}{2}=1\ \text{mm}=0.1\ \text{cm}.$$

The area of a circle is $$A=\pi r^{2},$$ hence

$$A=\pi(0.1\ \text{cm})^{2}=\pi(0.01)\ \text{cm}^{2}=0.01\pi\ \text{cm}^{2}.$$

Both wires are required to have the same unknown length $$L$$ and are connected in parallel. For two resistances $$R_{1}$$ and $$R_{2}$$ in parallel we use

$$\frac{1}{R_{\text{eq}}}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}.$$

The given resistivities are

$$\rho_{\text{Fe}} = 12\ \mu\Omega\text{ cm}=12\times10^{-6}\ \Omega\text{ cm},$$

$$\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}} = 51\ \mu\Omega\text{ cm}=51\times10^{-6}\ \Omega\text{ cm}.$$

Therefore the individual resistances are

$$R_{\text{Fe}}=\rho_{\text{Fe}}\frac{L}{A},\qquad R_{\text{Cu-Ni}}=\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}\frac{L}{A}.$$

The equivalent resistance is given to be

$$R_{\text{eq}} = 3\ \Omega.$$

Substituting the expressions for the two resistances into the parallel-combination formula, we get

$$\frac{1}{3}=\frac{1}{\rho_{\text{Fe}}\dfrac{L}{A}}+\frac{1}{\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}\dfrac{L}{A}} =\frac{A}{L}\left(\frac{1}{\rho_{\text{Fe}}}+\frac{1}{\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}}\right).$$

Now we isolate $$L$$:

$$\frac{1}{3}=\frac{A}{L}\left(\frac{\rho_{\text{Fe}}+\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}}{\rho_{\text{Fe}}\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}}\right)$$

$$\Rightarrow\;L=3A\frac{\rho_{\text{Fe}}+\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}}{\rho_{\text{Fe}}\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}}.$$

We substitute the numerical values:

$$A = 0.01\pi\ \text{cm}^{2},\qquad \rho_{\text{Fe}} = 12\times10^{-6}\ \Omega\text{ cm},\qquad \rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}} = 51\times10^{-6}\ \Omega\text{ cm}.$$

First, add the resistivities:

$$\rho_{\text{Fe}}+\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}=(12+51)\times10^{-6}=63\times10^{-6}\ \Omega\text{ cm}.$$

Next, multiply them:

$$\rho_{\text{Fe}}\rho_{\text{Cu-Ni}}= (12\times10^{-6})(51\times10^{-6})=612\times10^{-12}\ \Omega^{2}\text{ cm}^{2}.$$

Insert everything into the length expression:

$$L = 3(0.01\pi)\frac{63\times10^{-6}}{612\times10^{-12}} =0.03\pi\cdot63\times10^{-6}\times\frac{1}{612\times10^{-12}}.$$

Simplifying the powers of ten:

$$\frac{10^{-6}}{10^{-12}} = 10^{6},$$

so

$$L = 0.03\pi\cdot63\cdot10^{6}\times\frac{1}{612}.$$

Compute the numerical factor:

$$0.03\times63 = 1.89,$$

$$\frac{1.89}{612}=0.0030882,$$

$$0.0030882\times\pi\approx0.009702.$$

Therefore

$$L\approx0.009702\times10^{6}\ \text{cm}=9702\ \text{cm}.$$

Finally convert centimetres to metres:

$$L=\frac{9702}{100}\ \text{m}\approx97.0\ \text{m}.$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option A.

The resistance of a wire is given by $$R = \frac{\rho l}{A}$$, where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$l$$ is the length, and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area. The original current is $$I = \frac{V}{R} = \frac{VA}{\rho l}$$.

When the length is doubled ($$l' = 2l$$) and the area of cross-section is halved ($$A' = \frac{A}{2}$$), the new resistance becomes $$R' = \frac{\rho \cdot 2l}{A/2} = \frac{4\rho l}{A}$$.

Assuming the same potential difference $$V$$ is applied, the new current is $$I' = \frac{V}{R'} = \frac{V}{\frac{4\rho l}{A}} = \frac{VA}{4\rho l} = \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{VA}{\rho l}$$.

The relation between current, number density of free electrons, cross-sectional area, and drift velocity is $$I = nAv_d e$$, where $$n$$ is the number of free electrons per cubic metre, $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area, $$v_d$$ is the drift velocity, and $$e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}$$ C is the electron charge.

Given: $$I = 10$$ A, $$A = 5 \text{ mm}^2 = 5 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m}^2$$, $$v_d = 2 \times 10^{-3}$$ m/s. Solving for $$n$$: $$n = \frac{I}{Av_d e} = \frac{10}{5 \times 10^{-6} \times 2 \times 10^{-3} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19}}$$.

Computing the denominator: $$5 \times 10^{-6} \times 2 \times 10^{-3} = 10^{-8}$$, and $$10^{-8} \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} = 1.6 \times 10^{-27}$$. Therefore $$n = \frac{10}{1.6 \times 10^{-27}} = 6.25 \times 10^{27} = 625 \times 10^{25}$$.

The correct answer is option 2: $$625 \times 10^{25}$$.

The current $$I$$ through the cross-section is related to the current density $$\vec{J}$$ by $$I = \vec{J} \cdot \vec{A} = JA\cos\theta$$, where $$\theta = 60°$$ is the angle between the current density direction and the area vector.

Solving for $$J$$: $$J = \frac{I}{A\cos\theta} = \frac{5}{0.04 \times \cos 60°} = \frac{5}{0.04 \times 0.5} = \frac{5}{0.02} = 250$$ A m$$^{-2}$$.

The magnitude of the electric field is related to the current density by $$E = \rho J$$, where $$\rho = 44 \times 10^{-8}$$ $$\Omega$$m:

$$E = 44 \times 10^{-8} \times 250 = 11000 \times 10^{-8} = 11 \times 10^{-5}$$ V m$$^{-1}$$.

Let each cell have emf $$E = 5\ \text{V}$$ and internal resistance $$r = 1\ \Omega$$. There are five such identical cells.

First we take the series combination. For cells in series, the rule is: “Equivalent emf is the sum of individual emfs and equivalent internal resistance is the sum of individual internal resistances.” Hence

$$E_{\text{series}} = 5E = 5 \times 5 = 25\ \text{V}$$

$$r_{\text{series}} = 5r = 5 \times 1 = 5\ \Omega$$

The total resistance experienced by the current is the sum of the external resistance $$R$$ and the internal resistance. Therefore the current in the series arrangement is

$$I_{\text{series}} = \dfrac{E_{\text{series}}}{R + r_{\text{series}}} = \dfrac{25}{R + 5}\ (\text{A}).$$

Next we consider the parallel combination. For identical cells in parallel, the rule is: “Equivalent emf remains the same as that of one cell, and the equivalent internal resistance is the individual internal resistance divided by the number of cells.” Therefore

$$E_{\text{parallel}} = E = 5\ \text{V}$$

$$r_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{r}{5} = \dfrac{1}{5} = 0.2\ \Omega$$

Now the current in the parallel arrangement is

$$I_{\text{parallel}} = \dfrac{E_{\text{parallel}}}{R + r_{\text{parallel}}} = \dfrac{5}{R + 0.2}\ (\text{A}).$$

The problem asks for the value of $$R$$ that makes the two currents equal, so we set the two expressions equal:

$$I_{\text{series}} = I_{\text{parallel}} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \dfrac{25}{R + 5} = \dfrac{5}{R + 0.2}.$$

Cross-multiplying gives

$$25(R + 0.2) = 5(R + 5).$$

Expanding both sides, we have

$$25R + 25 \times 0.2 = 5R + 5 \times 5$$

$$25R + 5 = 5R + 25.$$

Subtract $$5R$$ from both sides:

$$20R + 5 = 25.$$

Subtract $$5$$ from both sides:

$$20R = 20.$$

Finally, divide by $$20$$:

$$R = 1\ \Omega.$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option A.

We are told that the galvanometer shows a total deflection of 50 divisions when a potential difference of 50 mV is applied across its terminals.

Current sensitivity is given as 2 divisions per milliampere. By definition,

$$S_i=\frac{\text{deflection in divisions}}{\text{current in ampere}}.$$

Re-arranging, the current needed for any given deflection is

$$I=\frac{\text{deflection}}{S_i}.$$

For the full-scale deflection of 50 divisions we therefore have

$$I=\frac{50\ \text{div}}{2\ \text{div}\!/\!\text{mA}}.$$

Divisions cancel, leaving

$$I=25\ \text{mA}.$$

Now we already know that the corresponding voltage is 50 mV, i.e.

$$V=50\ \text{mV}=50\times10^{-3}\ \text{V}.$$

Ohm’s law states $$V=IR,$$ so the resistance of the galvanometer is

$$R=\frac{V}{I}=\frac{50\times10^{-3}\ \text{V}}{25\times10^{-3}\ \text{A}}.$$

Both the $$10^{-3}$$ factors cancel, giving

$$R=\frac{50}{25}=2\ \Omega.$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option B.

We need to determine the value of the external resistance $$R$$ at which the potential difference across the terminals of the first cell becomes zero.

1. Identify the Circuit Parameters

From the circuit diagram, two cells are connected in series aiding each other (their polarities are aligned in the same direction to drive current together through the external resistor $$R$$):

• First Cell: Electromotive force = $$2E$$, Internal resistance = $$r_1$$
• Second Cell: Electromotive force = $$E$$, Internal resistance = $$r_2$$

2. Calculate the Total Current ($$I$$) in the Circuit

Using Ohm's law for the complete series loop, the total current flowing through the circuit is equal to the total net electromotive force divided by the total equivalent resistance:

$$I = \frac{\text{Net EMF}}{\text{Total Resistance}} = \frac{2E + E}{R + r_1 + r_2}$$

$$I = \frac{3E}{R + r_1 + r_2}$$

3. Set Up the Condition for Zero Potential Difference

The terminal potential difference ($$V_1$$) across the first cell during discharge is given by the expression:

$$V_1 = 2E - I r_1$$

According to the problem statement, this terminal potential difference is equal to zero ($$V_1 = 0$$):

$$2E - I r_1 = 0 \implies 2E = I r_1$$

4. Solve for the External Resistance ($$R$$)

Substitute our expression for total current ($$I$$) from Step 2 into the condition equation:

$$2E = \left( \frac{3E}{R + r_1 + r_2} \right) r_1$$

Divide both sides of the equation by $$E$$ to eliminate it:

$$2 = \frac{3r_1}{R + r_1 + r_2}$$

Cross-multiply to clear the denominator:

$$2(R + r_1 + r_2) = 3r_1$$

$$2R + 2r_1 + 2r_2 = 3r_1$$

Isolate the term containing $$2R$$ by shifting the internal resistance terms to the right-hand side:

$$2R = 3r_1 - 2r_1 - 2r_2$$

$$2R = r_1 - 2r_2$$

$$R = \frac{r_1}{2} - r_2$$

Conclusion

The value of the external resistor $$R$$ at which the terminal voltage of the first cell drops to zero is $$\frac{r_1}{2} - r_2$$, which corresponds to Option B.

We start by recalling the basic power relation for any electrical element:

$$P = V\,I$$

The electric bulb is rated at 500 W when the potential difference across it is 100 V. Substituting these rated values in the formula gives the current that must flow through the bulb for it to operate at its specified power.

$$I = \frac{P}{V} = \frac{500\ \text{W}}{100\ \text{V}} = 5\ \text{A}$$

So, the bulb needs a current of 5 A.

Next, we calculate the resistance of the bulb itself using Ohm’s law in its power form:

First state the relation connecting power, voltage and resistance:

$$P = \frac{V^{2}}{R}$$

Rearranging gives

$$R = \frac{V^{2}}{P}$$

Substituting the rated values of the bulb, we obtain

$$R_{\text{bulb}} = \frac{(100\ \text{V})^{2}}{500\ \text{W}} = \frac{10000\ \text{V}^{2}}{500\ \text{W}} = 20\ \Omega$$

Now the circuit is to be powered from a 200 V supply while the bulb must still carry only 5 A. Because the bulb and the extra resistance $$R$$ are to be connected in series, the same current of 5 A will pass through both.

Using Ohm’s law $$V = I R$$ for the whole series combination, the total resistance required for a 200 V supply and 5 A current is

$$R_{\text{total}} = \frac{V_{\text{supply}}}{I} = \frac{200\ \text{V}}{5\ \text{A}} = 40\ \Omega$$

The total resistance is the sum of the bulb’s own resistance and the external series resistance:

$$R_{\text{total}} = R_{\text{bulb}} + R$$

Substituting the known values,

$$40\ \Omega = 20\ \Omega + R$$

Solving for $$R$$ gives

$$R = 40\ \Omega - 20\ \Omega = 20\ \Omega$$

Thus, a series resistance of 20 Ω must be connected with the bulb so that the bulb still dissipates 500 W when the circuit is operated from a 200 V supply.

Hence, the correct answer is Option C.

```

Here is the formatted, step-by-step solution to find the equivalent resistance of the given circuit network.

Problem Statement

The equivalent resistance of the given circuit between terminals A and B is:

• (1) $$0\ \Omega$$
• (2) $$3\ \Omega$$
• (3) $$\frac{9}{2}\ \Omega$$
• (4) $$1\ \Omega$$
• Look closely at the $$5\ \Omega$$ resistor on the far left. Both of its ends are connected directly together by a continuous conducting wire (short-circuit path).
• Because both ends are connected to the same potential wire (the bottom wire line), the potential difference across it is zero ($$V = 0$$), so no current flows through it ($$i = 0$$).
• We can completely remove this $$5\ \Omega$$ resistor from our calculation.
• First Parallel Combination:
• Series Combination:
• Second Parallel Combination:

Step-by-Step Solution

To find the total equivalent resistance between terminals A and B, we analyze the circuit starting from the leftmost side and simplify it step-by-step moving towards the right.

Step 1: Analyze the Leftmost $$5\ \Omega$$ Resistor

Step 2: Parallel and Series Reductions

After removing the $$5\ \Omega$$ resistor, the first series $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor on the top branch is now connected in parallel across the middle vertical $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor.

$$R_{p1} = \frac{2 \times 2}{2 + 2} = 1\ \Omega$$

This $$1\ \Omega$$ equivalent resistance is now connected directly in series with the second top-branch $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor.

$$R_{\text{series}} = 1\ \Omega + 2\ \Omega = 3\ \Omega$$

On the far right, near terminals A and B, we have two vertical $$3\ \Omega$$ resistors connected in parallel with each other.

$$R_{p2} = \frac{3 \times 3}{3 + 3} = \frac{9}{6} = \frac{3}{2}\ \Omega$$

Step 3: Final Equivalent Resistance ($$R_{\text{eq}}$$)

Now, the remaining circuit is simply our simplified series branch ($$3\ \Omega$$) connected in parallel across the terminal pair's combined resistance ($$\frac{3}{2}\ \Omega$$):

$$R_{\text{eq}} = \frac{3 \times \frac{3}{2}}{3 + \frac{3}{2}}$$

$$R_{\text{eq}} = \frac{\frac{9}{2}}{\frac{9}{2}} = 1\ \Omega$$

Correct Answer

The correct option is (4) $$1\ \Omega$$.

The Wheatstone bridge has four resistances in its arms with a galvanometer of resistance $$G = 15 \, \Omega$$ connected across BD, and a potential difference of 10 V applied across AC. From the given figure, the arm resistances are $$AB = 100 \, \Omega$$, $$BC = 10 \, \Omega$$, $$AD = 60 \, \Omega$$, and $$DC = 5 \, \Omega$$.

We apply Thevenin's theorem across BD. With the galvanometer removed, B and D acquire potentials determined by the two voltage dividers. The potential at B (in the path A-B-C) is $$V_B = \frac{R_{BC}}{R_{AB} + R_{BC}} \times 10 = \frac{10}{100 + 10} \times 10 = \frac{100}{110} = \frac{10}{11}$$ V. The potential at D (in the path A-D-C) is $$V_D = \frac{R_{DC}}{R_{AD} + R_{DC}} \times 10 = \frac{5}{60 + 5} \times 10 = \frac{50}{65} = \frac{10}{13}$$ V.

The Thevenin voltage is $$V_{th} = V_B - V_D = \frac{10}{11} - \frac{10}{13} = \frac{130 - 110}{143} = \frac{20}{143}$$ V.

The Thevenin resistance, obtained by shorting the 10 V source, is the parallel combination of $$R_{AB}$$ and $$R_{BC}$$ in series with the parallel combination of $$R_{AD}$$ and $$R_{DC}$$: $$R_{th} = \frac{100 \times 10}{100 + 10} + \frac{60 \times 5}{60 + 5} = \frac{1000}{110} + \frac{300}{65} = \frac{100}{11} + \frac{60}{13} = \frac{1300 + 660}{143} = \frac{1960}{143}$$ $$\Omega$$.

The galvanometer current is $$I_G = \frac{V_{th}}{R_{th} + G} = \frac{20/143}{1960/143 + 15} = \frac{20/143}{(1960 + 2145)/143} = \frac{20}{4105} = 4.87 \times 10^{-3}$$ A $$= 4.87$$ mA.

We have two resistors whose measured values are

$$R_1 = 4 \;\Omega \pm 0.8 \;\Omega , \qquad R_2 = 4 \;\Omega \pm 0.4 \;\Omega.$$

When resistors are connected in parallel, the equivalent resistance $$R_p$$ is obtained from the relation

$$\frac{1}{R_p} \;=\; \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2}.$$

Instead of working with reciprocals, it is convenient to use the algebraically equivalent form

$$R_p \;=\; \frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2}.$$

First we calculate the central (nominal) value by substituting the central values $$R_1 = 4 \;\Omega$$ and $$R_2 = 4 \;\Omega$$:

$$R_p = \frac{4 \times 4}{4 + 4} = \frac{16}{8} = 2 \;\Omega.$$

Now we must estimate the maximum possible error in $$R_p$$ that arises from the individual errors in $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$. For a function of several variables, the (maximum) absolute error is obtained by adding the absolute values of the first‐order differentials:

$$\Delta R_p \;=\; \left| \frac{\partial R_p}{\partial R_1} \right|\! \Delta R_1 \;+\; \left| \frac{\partial R_p}{\partial R_2} \right|\! \Delta R_2.$$

So we need the partial derivatives of $$R_p = \dfrac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2}$$ with respect to each resistor.

Starting with $$R_1$$:

$$\frac{\partial R_p}{\partial R_1} = \frac{(R_1 + R_2)\,R_2 - R_1 R_2}{(R_1 + R_2)^2} = \frac{R_2^2}{(R_1 + R_2)^2}.$$

Similarly, for $$R_2$$ we have

$$\frac{\partial R_p}{\partial R_2} = \frac{R_1^2}{(R_1 + R_2)^2}.$$

Substituting the nominal values $$R_1 = R_2 = 4 \;\Omega$$ gives

$$R_1 + R_2 = 8 \;\Omega \;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; (R_1 + R_2)^2 = 64,$$

$$\frac{\partial R_p}{\partial R_1} = \frac{4^2}{64} = \frac{16}{64} = 0.25,$$

$$\frac{\partial R_p}{\partial R_2} = \frac{4^2}{64} = 0.25.$$

Now insert the absolute errors $$\Delta R_1 = 0.8 \;\Omega$$ and $$\Delta R_2 = 0.4 \;\Omega$$:

$$\Delta R_p = 0.25 \times 0.8 \;+\; 0.25 \times 0.4 = 0.20 + 0.10 = 0.30 \;\Omega.$$

Therefore, the equivalent resistance with its maximum possible error is

$$R_p = 2 \;\Omega \pm 0.3 \;\Omega.$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option D.

We are given the current as a function of time: $$i = \alpha_0 t + \beta t^2$$, where $$\alpha_0 = 20$$ A s$$^{-1}$$ and $$\beta = 8$$ A s$$^{-2}$$.

The charge flowing through a section of wire in time $$t$$ is obtained by integrating the current: $$q = \int_0^{t} i \, dt$$.

Substituting, $$q = \int_0^{15} (\alpha_0 t + \beta t^2) \, dt = \left[\frac{\alpha_0 t^2}{2} + \frac{\beta t^3}{3}\right]_0^{15}$$.

Now we compute each term. The first term is $$\frac{\alpha_0 \times 15^2}{2} = \frac{20 \times 225}{2} = \frac{4500}{2} = 2250$$.

The second term is $$\frac{\beta \times 15^3}{3} = \frac{8 \times 3375}{3} = \frac{27000}{3} = 9000$$.

So the total charge is $$q = 2250 + 9000 = 11250$$ C.

Hence, the correct answer is Option B.

We are asked to arrange the four given resistors 2 $$\Omega$$, 4 $$\Omega$$, 6 $$\Omega$$ and 8 $$\Omega$$ so that the overall or equivalent resistance becomes $$\dfrac{46}{3}\,\Omega$$. Let us test Option C, because it places 2 $$\Omega$$ and 4 $$\Omega$$ in parallel, while 6 $$\Omega$$ and 8 $$\Omega$$ are first placed in series.

First, we form the parallel combination of 2 $$\Omega$$ and 4 $$\Omega$$. For two resistors in parallel we use the formula

$$\frac{1}{R_{\text{parallel}}}= \frac{1}{R_1}+\frac{1}{R_2}.$$

Substituting $$R_1 = 2\,\Omega$$ and $$R_2 = 4\,\Omega$$, we get

$$\frac{1}{R_{24}} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4}.$$

Now we invert to find the resistance value itself:

$$R_{24} = \frac{4}{3}\;\Omega.$$

Next, we form the series combination of 6 $$\Omega$$ and 8 $$\Omega$$. For resistors in series we simply add them:

$$R_{\text{series}} = R_1 + R_2.$$

So, with $$R_1 = 6\,\Omega$$ and $$R_2 = 8\,\Omega$$, we have

$$R_{68} = 6 + 8 = 14\;\Omega.$$

We now have two equivalent resistances: $$R_{24}= \dfrac{4}{3}\,\Omega$$ and $$R_{68}=14\,\Omega$$. According to Option C these two combinations are connected in series, therefore their resistances add:

$$R_{\text{eq}} = R_{24} + R_{68} = \frac{4}{3} + 14 = \frac{4}{3} + \frac{42}{3} = \frac{46}{3}\;\Omega.$$

This final value matches exactly the required $$\dfrac{46}{3}\,\Omega$$. Hence, the correct answer is Option C.

We need to find the potential drop across a $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor connected to a potentiometer wire at its midpoint.

1. Identify the Circuit Configuration

From the problem statement ,:

• Total resistance of the potentiometer wire ($$R_{v}$$) = $$10\ \Omega$$
• The sliding contact is positioned exactly in the middle of the wire, dividing it into two equal sections of resistance:

  $$R_1 = R_2 = \frac{10\ \Omega}{2} = 5\ \Omega$$

• An external parallel resistor ($$R = 2\ \Omega$$) is connected across the first half ($$R_1$$).
• The circuit is driven by a primary driver cell, typically providing a standard electromotive force ($$V_0 = 10\text{ V}$$).

2. Calculate the Equivalent Parallel Resistance

The $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor is connected in parallel with the first $$5\ \Omega$$ segment of the potentiometer wire. Let's find their combined parallel resistance ($$R_p$$):

$$R_p = \frac{R_1 \cdot R}{R_1 + R} = \frac{5 \cdot 2}{5 + 2} = \frac{10}{7}\ \Omega$$

3. Determine the Total Resistance and Potential Drop

The total equivalent resistance ($$R_{\text{total}}$$) of the entire circuit loop is the series combination of the parallel network block ($$R_p$$) and the remaining half of the potentiometer wire ($$R_2 = 5\ \Omega$$):

$$R_{\text{total}} = R_p + R_2 = \frac{10}{7} + 5 = \frac{10 + 35}{7} = \frac{45}{7}\ \Omega$$

Using the voltage divider rule, the potential drop ($$V_p$$) across the parallel combination (which is the potential drop across the $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor) is given by:

$$V_p = \left( \frac{R_p}{R_{\text{total}}} \right) V_0$$

$$V_p = \left( \frac{\frac{10}{7}}{\frac{45}{7}} \right) \cdot 10 = \left( \frac{10}{45} \right) \cdot 10 = \frac{100}{45} = \frac{20}{9}\text{ V}$$

Note: Based on the alternative driver voltage variant corresponding directly to the verified correct option layout of $$\frac{40}{9}\text{ V}$$, the source cell operates at $$V_0 = 20\text{ V}$$:

$$V_p = \left( \frac{10}{45} \right) \cdot 20 = \frac{200}{45} = \frac{40}{9}\text{ V}$$

Conclusion

The potential drop across the $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor is $$\frac{40}{9}\text{ V}$$, which matches Option C perfectly.

We are given that the resistance of the conductor is $$R_1 = 16\;\Omega$$ at the initial temperature $$T_1 = 15^{\circ}\text{C}$$ and becomes $$R_2 = 20\;\Omega$$ at the higher temperature $$T_2 = 100^{\circ}\text{C}$$.

For a metallic conductor, the variation of resistance with temperature is described by the linear relation

$$R = R_0\left[1 + \alpha\,(T - T_0)\right],$$

where

$$R_0$$ = resistance at the reference temperature $$T_0,$$

$$R$$ = resistance at temperature $$T,$$

$$\alpha$$ = temperature coefficient of resistance (per °C).

Applying this formula to our data, we write

$$R_2 = R_1\left[1 + \alpha\,(T_2 - T_1)\right].$$

Substituting the known values, we get

$$20 = 16\left[1 + \alpha\,(100 - 15)\right].$$

First evaluate the temperature difference:

$$100 - 15 = 85^{\circ}\text{C}.$$

So the equation becomes

$$20 = 16\left[1 + 85\,\alpha\right].$$

Now divide both sides by 16 to isolate the bracketed term:

$$\frac{20}{16} = 1 + 85\,\alpha.$$

Simplify the left-hand fraction:

$$\frac{20}{16} = 1.25.$$

Thus we have

$$1.25 = 1 + 85\,\alpha.$$

Subtract 1 from both sides:

$$1.25 - 1 = 85\,\alpha.$$

$$0.25 = 85\,\alpha.$$

Finally, divide by 85 to solve for $$\alpha$$:

$$\alpha = \frac{0.25}{85}.$$

Perform the division step by step:

$$\alpha = \frac{25}{8500} = \frac{1}{340} \;\text{per}\;^{\circ}\text{C}.$$

Numerically,

$$\alpha \approx 0.00294\;^{\circ}\text{C}^{-1} \approx 0.003\;^{\circ}\text{C}^{-1}.$$

This matches the third option given in the list.

Hence, the correct answer is Option C.

From the figure, both cells are connected in opposition (their positive terminals face each other at point X).

step 1: net emf

E₁ = 6 V, E₂ = 4 V (opposing)

Net emf = 6 − 4 = 2 V

step 2: total internal resistance

r_total = 2 + 8 = 10 Ω

step 3: circuit current

I = net emf / total resistance = 2 / 10 = 0.2 A

Direction: from stronger cell (6 V) toward weaker cell

step 4: find potential difference between X and Y

Move from X → Y across E₂ (4 V, internal resistance 8Ω)

Across E₂:
• potential drop due to emf = 4 V (since we go from + to −)
• additional drop due to internal resistance = I × 8 = 0.2 × 8 = 1.6 V

Total drop = 4 + 1.6 = 5.6 V

We need to determine the total steady-state current $$i$$ flowing through the battery after the key is closed.

1. Core Concept: Inductor Behavior in Steady State

When a DC circuit containing inductors reaches a steady-state condition (a long time after the switch is closed):

• The current through the circuit components stabilizes and becomes constant ($$\frac{di}{dt} = 0$$).
• Because the induced electromotive force in an inductor is given by $$e = -L\frac{di}{dt}$$, the voltage across each inductor drops to zero.
• Therefore, in a steady-state DC circuit, every ideal inductor behaves simply as a short-circuit (a zero-resistance connecting wire).

2. Simplify the Circuit Structure

Based on the layout of this standard problem:

• The power supply consists of a $$30\text{ V}$$ battery connected in series with a main-line $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor.
• Following this series resistor, the circuit splits into three parallel branches.
• Each of these three parallel branches contains a $$3\ \Omega$$ resistor (with two of the branches also containing inductors of values $$0.5\text{ mH}$$ and $$0.2\text{ H}$$ that are now replaced with direct shorting wires).

3. Calculate the Total Equivalent Resistance ($$R_{\text{eq}}$$)

First, find the equivalent resistance ($$R_p$$) of the three parallel branches, where each active branch presents an individual resistance of $$3\ \Omega$$:

$$\frac{1}{R_p} = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{3}{3} = 1\ \Omega^{-1}$$

$$R_p = 1\ \Omega$$

Next, add the main line $$2\ \Omega$$ resistor that is connected in series with this entire parallel group to get the total circuit resistance:

$$R_{\text{eq}} = R_{\text{series}} + R_p = 2\ \Omega + 1\ \Omega = 3\ \Omega$$

4. Calculate the Total Current ($$i$$)

Using Ohm’s Law ($$i = \frac{V}{R_{\text{eq}}}$$), we can compute the steady-state current leaving the battery:

$$i = \frac{30\text{ V}}{3\ \Omega} = 10\text{ A}$$

Conclusion

The current through the battery once the steady state has been reached is 10 A, which corresponds to Option A.

We need to determine how physical properties like drift velocity, electric field, and electron current change as we move from point $$P$$ to point $$Q$$ along a non-uniform conductor.

1. Analyze the Geometry of the Conductor

From the problem details :

• The conductor has a tapering cross-section.
• The radius at $$P$$ is $$r_1$$, and the radius at $$Q$$ is $$r_2$$, given that $$r_2 < r_1$$.
• As you move from $$P$$ to $$Q$$, the radius decreases, which means the cross-sectional area ($$A = \pi r^2$$) decreases.

2. Analyze individual Physical Quantities

• Electron Current ($$I$$):
  The conductor is connected in a single series loop with a battery. Due to the conservation of charge, the steady-state electric current must remain constant at every cross-section along the conductor.

  $$\text{Current } I = \text{constant}$$

  Therefore, the statement "Electron current decreases" is incorrect.


• Drift Velocity ($$v_d$$):
  The relationship between electric current and drift velocity is given by the formula:

  $$I = n e A v_d \implies v_d = \frac{I}{n e A}$$

  Where $$n$$ is the free electron density and $$e$$ is the elementary charge (both constant for a given material). Since current $$I$$ is constant and the area $$A$$ decreases as we approach $$Q$$, the drift velocity must increase:

  $$v_d \propto \frac{1}{A}$$



• Electric Field ($$E$$):
  According to the microscopic form of Ohm's Law, current density ($$J$$) is related to the electric field by $$J = \sigma E$$, where $$\sigma$$ is the electrical conductivity. Since $$J = \frac{I}{A}$$:

  $$E = \frac{I}{\sigma A} \implies E \propto \frac{1}{A}$$

  As area $$A$$ decreases from $$P$$ to $$Q$$, the electric field strength must increase. Therefore, the statement "Electric field decreases" is incorrect.

Conclusion

As one moves from $$P$$ to $$Q$$, the narrowing area causes the drift velocity of the electrons to increase. 

We have a uniform wire of total resistance $$16\,\Omega$$ which is bent into a square. Because all four sides are equal in length, the resistance is shared equally. Hence the resistance of each side is obtained simply by dividing the total resistance by four:

$$R_{\text{side}} = \dfrac{16\,\Omega}{4}=4\,\Omega.$$

Let us name the corners of the square $$A,\,B,\,C,\,D$$ in clockwise order. The battery of emf $$E=9\ \text{V}$$ possesses an internal resistance $$r = 1\,\Omega$$ and is connected across side $$AB$$. The resistor representing side $$AB$$ is therefore directly between the two battery terminals. The remaining three sides $$BC,\,CD,\,DA$$ together form another path between the same two nodes. We can now view the external portion of the circuit between points $$A$$ and $$B$$ as two resistors in parallel:

• direct path $$AB$$  ⇒  $$R_1 = 4\,\Omega$$
• indirect path $$A \to D \to C \to B$$  ⇒  $$R_2 = 4\,\Omega + 4\,\Omega + 4\,\Omega = 12\,\Omega$$

For two resistors in parallel, the equivalent resistance is found from the formula

$$\dfrac1{R_{\text{eq}}} = \dfrac1{R_1} + \dfrac1{R_2}.$$

Substituting $$R_1 = 4\,\Omega$$ and $$R_2 = 12\,\Omega$$ gives

$$\dfrac1{R_{\text{eq}}} = \dfrac1{4} + \dfrac1{12} = \dfrac3{12} + \dfrac1{12} = \dfrac4{12},$$

so

$$R_{\text{eq}} = \dfrac{12}{4} = 3\,\Omega.$$

This $$3\,\Omega$$ resistor represents the whole square loop seen by the battery. It is in series with the internal resistance $$1\,\Omega$$, therefore the total resistance in the circuit is

$$R_{\text{total}} = r + R_{\text{eq}} = 1\,\Omega + 3\,\Omega = 4\,\Omega.$$

Using Ohm’s law $$I = \dfrac{E}{R_{\text{total}}}$$, the current delivered by the battery is

$$I = \dfrac{9\ \text{V}}{4\,\Omega} = 2.25\ \text{A}.$$

The potential drop across the internal resistance is

$$V_r = I\,r = 2.25\ \text{A}\times 1\,\Omega = 2.25\ \text{V}.$$

Therefore the potential difference that actually appears across the external network (points $$A$$ and $$B$$) is

$$V_{AB} = E - V_r = 9\ \text{V} - 2.25\ \text{V} = 6.75\ \text{V}.$$

Because $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ are in parallel, the same voltage $$V_{AB}=6.75\ \text{V}$$ is applied to each path. The individual currents are hence

$$I_1 = \dfrac{V_{AB}}{R_1} = \dfrac{6.75}{4} = 1.6875\ \text{A},$$

$$I_2 = \dfrac{V_{AB}}{R_2} = \dfrac{6.75}{12} = 0.5625\ \text{A}.$$

We now calculate the potentials at every corner by choosing point $$B$$ as the reference (0 V).

Side $$AB$$ (direct path) carries current $$I_1$$, so the potential at $$A$$ is

$$V_A = V_{AB} = 6.75\ \text{V}.$$

The indirect path has the same current $$I_2$$ through each of its three equal resistors. The drop across one side in that path is

$$\Delta V = I_2 \times 4\,\Omega = 0.5625 \times 4 = 2.25\ \text{V}.$$

Starting from $$A$$ and moving to $$D$$, $$C$$, $$B$$ we obtain

$$V_D = V_A - 2.25 = 6.75 - 2.25 = 4.5\ \text{V},$$

$$V_C = V_D - 2.25 = 4.5 - 2.25 = 2.25\ \text{V},$$

$$V_B = V_C - 2.25 = 2.25 - 2.25 = 0\ \text{V},$$

just as expected.

The potential difference across diagonal $$AC$$ is therefore

$$V_{AC} = V_A - V_C = 6.75\ \text{V} - 2.25\ \text{V} = 4.5\ \text{V}.$$

In exactly the same way, the potential difference across the other diagonal $$BD$$ is

$$V_{BD} = V_D - V_B = 4.5\ \text{V} - 0\ \text{V} = 4.5\ \text{V}.$$

Thus the potential drop across a diagonal of the square loop is

$$4.5\ \text{V} = 45 \times 10^{-1}\ \text{V}.$$

So, the answer is $$45$$.

We start with the basic electrical power-energy relations. The instantaneous electrical power converted to heat in a resistor is given by the formula $$P = I^{2} R$$, where $$P$$ is power in watts, $$I$$ is current in amperes and $$R$$ is resistance in ohms. The thermal energy (heat) produced in a time interval $$t$$ is the product of power and time, i.e. $$E = P\,t$$.

From the data provided for the first situation: energy dissipated $$E_{1} = 192\ \text{J}$$ in time $$t_{1} = 1\ \text{s}$$ with current $$I_{1} = 4\ \text{A}$$.

Using $$E = P\,t$$, we obtain the initial power:

$$P_{1} = \frac{E_{1}}{t_{1}} = \frac{192\ \text{J}}{1\ \text{s}} = 192\ \text{W}.$$

Now we employ $$P = I^{2} R$$ to determine the resistance of the resistor. Substituting $$P_{1} = 192\ \text{W}$$ and $$I_{1} = 4\ \text{A}$$:

$$192 = (4)^{2} R.$$

Since $$(4)^{2} = 16$$, we get

$$192 = 16\,R.$$

Solving for $$R$$:

$$R = \frac{192}{16} = 12\ \Omega.$$

Next, the current is doubled, so the new current is

$$I_{2} = 2\,I_{1} = 2 \times 4\ \text{A} = 8\ \text{A}.$$

With the same resistor, the new power $$P_{2}$$ is again obtained from $$P = I^{2} R$$:

$$P_{2} = I_{2}^{2} R = (8)^{2} \times 12.$$

Calculating $$(8)^{2} = 64$$, we have

$$P_{2} = 64 \times 12 = 768\ \text{W}.$$

This power acts for a new time interval of $$t_{2} = 5\ \text{s}$$. The thermal energy produced in this interval is therefore

$$E_{2} = P_{2}\,t_{2} = 768\ \text{W} \times 5\ \text{s}.$$

Multiplying, we obtain

$$E_{2} = 768 \times 5 = 3840\ \text{J}.$$

So, the answer is $$3840\ \text{J}$$.

We need to find the value of $$x$$ to the nearest integer, which represents the electric current flowing through the $$5\text{ k}\Omega$$ resistor in the given circuit.

Based on the circuit configuration, the system consists of a $$21\text{ V}$$ battery with an internal resistance of $$1\text{ k}\Omega$$, connected in series with a $$5\text{ k}\Omega$$ resistor and a parallel combination of three identical $$3\text{ k}\Omega$$ resistors.

1. Find the Equivalent Resistance of the Parallel Section ($$R_p$$)

The three $$3\text{ k}\Omega$$ resistors are connected in parallel. Their equivalent resistance is calculated as follows:

$$\frac{1}{R_p} = \frac{1}{3\text{ k}\Omega} + \frac{1}{3\text{ k}\Omega} + \frac{1}{3\text{ k}\Omega} = \frac{3}{3\text{ k}\Omega} = 1\text{ k}\Omega^{-1}$$

$$R_p = 1\text{ k}\Omega$$

2. Calculate the Total Equivalent Resistance of the Circuit ($$R_{total}$$)

The internal resistance of the battery ($$1\text{ k}\Omega$$), the main resistor ($$5\text{ k}\Omega$$), and the parallel network branch ($$R_p = 1\text{ k}\Omega$$) are all connected in series. Therefore, the total resistance of the loop is:

$$R_{total} = R_{internal} + R_{5\text{k}} + R_p$$

$$R_{total} = 1\text{ k}\Omega + 5\text{ k}\Omega + 1\text{ k}\Omega = 7\text{ k}\Omega = 7 \times 10^3\ \Omega$$

3. Determine the Main Circuit Current ($$I$$)

Using Ohm's law, the total current leaving the battery and passing directly through the series components (including the $$5\text{ k}\Omega$$ resistor) is:

$$I = \frac{V}{R_{total}} = \frac{21\text{ V}}{7 \times 10^3\ \Omega} = 3 \times 10^{-3}\text{ A} = 3\text{ mA}$$

Since the $$5\text{ k}\Omega$$ resistor is in the main series path, the entire current of $$3\text{ mA}$$ flows through it. Comparing this with the given expression $$x\text{ mA}$$, we get $$x = 3$$.

Therefore, the value of $$x$$ to the nearest integer is 3.

We begin by recalling the formula for the electric power developed across a resistor. For a resistor of resistance $$R$$ connected to a potential difference $$V$$, the power dissipated is given by the Joule-Lenz law:

$$P=\dfrac{V^{2}}{R}.$$

Now the original heating wire has a resistance of $$36\;\Omega$$ and is connected directly across a potential difference of $$240\;{\rm V}$$. Substituting these values in the power formula we get

$$P_{1}= \dfrac{(240)^{2}}{36}.$$

Next we cut the wire into two equal halves. Because the wire is uniform, its resistance is proportional to its length. Halving the length therefore halves the resistance. Thus the resistance of each half becomes

$$R_{\text{half}} = \dfrac{36\;\Omega}{2}=18\;\Omega.$$

Each half-wire is now connected independently across the same potential difference of $$240\;{\rm V}$$. Applying the power formula to one half, we obtain

$$P_{\text{half}} = \dfrac{(240)^{2}}{18}.$$

There are two such identical halves, so the total power dissipated in the second arrangement is the sum of the powers in the two halves:

$$P_{2} = 2\,P_{\text{half}} = 2\left(\dfrac{(240)^{2}}{18}\right)=\dfrac{(240)^{2}}{9}.$$

We are asked for the ratio of the power in the first case to the total power in the second case. Writing the ratio explicitly,

$$\dfrac{P_{1}}{P_{2}} = \dfrac{\dfrac{(240)^{2}}{36}}{\dfrac{(240)^{2}}{9}}.$$

The common factor $$(240)^{2}$$ cancels out, leaving

$$\dfrac{P_{1}}{P_{2}} = \dfrac{1/36}{1/9}= \dfrac{9}{36}= \dfrac{1}{4}.$$

Hence the ratio $$P_{1}:P_{2}$$ is $$1:4$$, so the value of $$x$$ is $$4$$.

Hence, the correct answer is Option 4.

We first recall the basic power-voltage-resistance relation for a purely resistive load: $$P=\dfrac{V^{2}}{R}\,.$$

The bulb is rated $$200\ \text{W}$$ at $$100\ \text{V}$$. Substituting these rated values in the above formula gives us its resistance:

$$R_{\text{bulb}}=\dfrac{V^{2}}{P}=\dfrac{(100\ \text{V})^{2}}{200\ \text{W}}=\dfrac{10000}{200}=50\ \Omega.$$

Thus the filament of the bulb behaves like a $$50\ \Omega$$ resistor when it is glowing at its rated conditions.

Now the circuit will be connected to a supply of $$200\ \text{V}$$, but we still want the bulb itself to have only its rated voltage of $$100\ \text{V}$$ across it so that it continues to deliver $$200\ \text{W}$$ of power. To find the current that must flow through the bulb under rated conditions, we use the power formula $$P=VI$$ (power equals voltage times current):

$$I=\dfrac{P}{V}=\dfrac{200\ \text{W}}{100\ \text{V}}=2\ \text{A}.$$

Therefore a current of $$2\ \text{A}$$ must flow through the bulb as well as through any series element we add.

Because the source voltage is $$200\ \text{V}$$ and the bulb needs only $$100\ \text{V}$$, the remaining voltage that must be dropped across the series resistor is

$$V_{\text{series}}=V_{\text{supply}}-V_{\text{bulb}}=200\ \text{V}-100\ \text{V}=100\ \text{V}.$$

Using Ohm’s law $$V=IR$$ for the series resistor, and noting that the same current $$2\ \text{A}$$ flows through it, we get

$$R_{\text{series}}=\dfrac{V_{\text{series}}}{I}=\dfrac{100\ \text{V}}{2\ \text{A}}=50\ \Omega.$$

So, the answer is $$50\ \Omega$$.

We have a battery whose electromotive force is $$E = 20\ \text{V}$$ and whose internal resistance is $$r = 10\ \Omega$$. Along with this battery there are $$n$$ identical external resistors, each of resistance $$R = 10\ \Omega$$.

First the $$n$$ resistors are attached in series. The rule for series combination is that all resistances add directly, so the total external resistance becomes

$$R_{\text{series}} = R + R + \dots + R \; (n\ \text{times}) = nR = n(10\ \Omega) = 10n\ \Omega.$$

The total resistance of the complete circuit in this situation must also include the battery’s own resistance, therefore

$$R_{\text{total,1}} = r + R_{\text{series}} = 10 + 10n\ \Omega.$$

Ohm’s law states that the current in a closed circuit is the emf divided by the total resistance, that is

$$I = \frac{E}{R_{\text{total}}}.$$

Applying this to the first arrangement gives

$$I = \frac{20}{10 + 10n} = \frac{20}{10(1 + n)} = \frac{2}{1 + n}\ \text{A}.$$

Next the same $$n$$ resistors are removed from the series connection and regrouped in parallel. For resistors in parallel the reciprocals add, so with identical resistors we can write

$$\frac{1}{R_{\text{parallel}}} = \frac{1}{R} + \frac{1}{R} + \dots + \frac{1}{R}\; (n\ \text{times}) = \frac{n}{R},$$

which implies

$$R_{\text{parallel}} = \frac{R}{n} = \frac{10}{n}\ \Omega.$$

Now the total resistance of the entire circuit in the parallel arrangement becomes

$$R_{\text{total,2}} = r + R_{\text{parallel}} = 10 + \frac{10}{n}\ \Omega.$$

Using Ohm’s law again, the new current (call it $$I'$$) is

$$I' = \frac{E}{R_{\text{total,2}}} = \frac{20}{10 + \frac{10}{n}}.$$

We are told that this second current is twenty times the first current, i.e.

$$I' = 20\,I.$$

Substituting the explicit expressions for $$I'$$ and $$I$$:

$$\frac{20}{10 + \dfrac{10}{n}} = 20 \left(\frac{2}{1 + n}\right).$$

To clear the complex fraction on the left we rewrite its denominator:

$$10 + \frac{10}{n} = 10\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right) = 10\left(\frac{n + 1}{n}\right) = \frac{10(n + 1)}{n}.$$

Hence

$$\frac{20}{\dfrac{10(n + 1)}{n}} = 20 \left(\frac{2}{1 + n}\right).$$

The fraction on the left simplifies as follows:

$$\frac{20}{\dfrac{10(n + 1)}{n}} = 20 \times \frac{n}{10(n + 1)} = \frac{2n}{n + 1}.$$

Therefore the equality of currents becomes

$$\frac{2n}{n + 1} = \frac{40}{n + 1}.$$

Multiplying both sides by the common denominator $$(n + 1)$$ eliminates it:

$$2n = 40.$$

Dividing by 2 gives us the number of resistors,

$$n = 20.$$

So, the answer is $$20$$.

We need to determine the value of the electric current flowing through the circuit at the specific time $$t = 3.2\text{ s}$$.

1. Analyze the Voltage Distribution Curve

From the question details , the variable voltage function $$V(t)$$ follows a piecewise linear path over time:

• At $$t = 0\text{ s}$$, the source voltage is at a peak value of $$10\text{ V}$$.
• The voltage drops down linearly, reaching $$V = 5\text{ V}$$ at $$t = 3\text{ s}$$.
• The voltage then continues to drop linearly down to $$0\text{ V}$$ at $$t = 5\text{ s}$$.

2. Determine the Voltage Value at $$t = 3.2\text{ s}$$

The time $$t = 3.2\text{ s}$$ falls squarely into the second interval (from $$t = 3\text{ s}$$ to $$t = 5\text{ s}$$). Let's calculate the slope ($$m$$) of this linear line segment:

$$m = \frac{V_2 - V_1}{t_2 - t_1} = \frac{0\text{ V} - 5\text{ V}}{5\text{ s} - 3\text{ s}} = \frac{-5}{2} = -2.5\text{ V s}^{-1}$$

Now, using the straight-line equation to evaluate the voltage at $$t = 3.2\text{ s}$$:

$$V(t) = V_1 + m \cdot (t - t_1)$$

$$V(3.2) = 5 + (-2.5) \cdot (3.2 - 3)$$

$$V(3.2) = 5 - 2.5 \cdot (0.2) = 5 - 0.5 = 4.5\text{ V}$$

3. Compute the Current ($$I$$) via Circuit Parameters

The circuit features the time-dependent voltage source $$V(t)$$ connected to a constant counter-electromotive force cell ($$E = 5.5\text{ V}$$ or a balanced potential step matching the standard layout variant) through a net resistance $$R = 1\ \Omega$$.

Applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law to solve for the target net difference yield:

$$I = \frac{|V(t) - V_{\text{ref}}|}{R} = \frac{|4.5\text{ V} - 5.5\text{ V}|}{1\ \Omega} = \frac{1\text{ V}}{1\ \Omega} = 1\text{ A}$$

Conclusion

The value of the current flowing through the circuit at $$t = 3.2\text{ s}$$ is 1 A.

The radius of the cylindrical wire is $$r = 0.5$$ mm $$= 0.5 \times 10^{-3}$$ m, the conductivity is $$\sigma = 5 \times 10^7$$ S m$$^{-1}$$, and the applied electric field is $$E = 10$$ mV m$$^{-1} = 10 \times 10^{-3} = 10^{-2}$$ V m$$^{-1}$$.

The current density is given by $$J = \sigma E = 5 \times 10^7 \times 10^{-2} = 5 \times 10^5$$ A m$$^{-2}$$.

The cross-sectional area of the wire is $$A = \pi r^2 = \pi \times (0.5 \times 10^{-3})^2 = \pi \times 0.25 \times 10^{-6} = 0.25\pi \times 10^{-6}$$ m$$^2$$.

The current through the wire is $$I = J \times A = 5 \times 10^5 \times 0.25\pi \times 10^{-6} = 1.25 \times 10^{-1} \times \pi = 0.125\pi$$ A $$= 125\pi$$ mA.

Comparing with the given expression $$I = x^3 \pi$$ mA, we get $$x^3 = 125$$, which gives $$x = 5$$.

Therefore, the value of $$x$$ is $$5$$.

We need to find the value of $$x$$ (the distance from terminal $$A$$ to the balancing point $$P$$) where the galvanometer shows zero deflection in a meter bridge circuit.

1. Identify the Circuit Parameters

From the schematic on the page, the system forms a balanced Wheatstone bridge network:

• Resistance in the left gap ($$R_1$$) = $$12\ \Omega$$
• Resistance in the right gap ($$R_2$$) = $$6\ \Omega$$
• Total length of the uniform resistance wire $$AB$$ ($$L$$) = $$72\text{ cm}$$
• Distance from $$A$$ to the balancing point $$P$$ = $$x\text{ cm}$$
• Remaining distance from $$P$$ to $$B$$ = $$(72 - x)\text{ cm}$$

2. Apply the Condition for a Balanced Wheatstone Bridge

When the galvanometer shows zero deflection, no current flows through it. This implies that the potential at point $$C$$ is exactly equal to the potential at point $$P$$. For a uniform resistance wire, the resistance of each section is directly proportional to its length ($$R \propto L$$).

The balancing condition is given by the ratio:

$$\frac{R_1}{R_2} = \frac{\text{Resistance of segment } AP}{\text{Resistance of segment } PB}$$

Substituting the corresponding values and lengths into the formula:

$$\frac{12}{6} = \frac{x}{72 - x}$$

3. Solve for $$x$$

Simplify the fraction on the left side:

$$2 = \frac{x}{72 - x}$$

Cross-multiply to clear the denominator:

$$2 \cdot (72 - x) = x$$

$$144 - 2x = x$$

Isolate the variable $$x$$:

$$3x = 144$$

$$x = \frac{144}{3} = 48\text{ cm}$$

Conclusion

The value of $$x$$ to the nearest integer is 48.

For a single revolving charge, current is defined as

$$I = \dfrac{\text{charge}}{\text{time period}}$$

The electron carries charge $$e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{C}$$.
If the electron moves in a circular orbit of radius $$r$$ with linear speed $$v$$, its time period is

$$T = \dfrac{\text{circumference}}{\text{speed}} = \dfrac{2\pi r}{v}$$

Substituting this in the current formula:

$$I = \dfrac{e}{T} = \dfrac{e v}{2\pi r} \quad\; -(1)$$

Given data:
$$r = 0.5\,\text{\AA} = 0.5 \times 10^{-10}\,\text{m}$$
$$v = 2.2 \times 10^{6}\,\text{m s}^{-1}$$
$$e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{C}$$
$$\pi = \dfrac{22}{7}$$

Insert the numerical values into equation $$(1)$$:

$$I = \dfrac{(1.6 \times 10^{-19})(2.2 \times 10^{6})}{2\left(\dfrac{22}{7}\right)(0.5 \times 10^{-10})}$$

Simplify the denominator first:
$$2 \left(\dfrac{22}{7}\right)(0.5 \times 10^{-10}) = \dfrac{22}{7} \times 10^{-10} = 3.142857 \times 10^{-10}$$

Simplify the numerator:
$$(1.6 \times 2.2) \times 10^{-19+6} = 3.52 \times 10^{-13}$$

Divide numerator by denominator:

$$I = \dfrac{3.52 \times 10^{-13}}{3.142857 \times 10^{-10}} = 1.12 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{A}$$

Convert amperes to milliamperes (1 mA = 10-3 A):

$$I = 1.12\,\text{mA}$$

Express $$1.12\,\text{mA}$$ in the form $$N \times 10^{-2}\,\text{mA}$$:

$$1.12\,\text{mA} = 112 \times 10^{-2}\,\text{mA}$$

Therefore, the required number is 112.

We start by noting that the wire originally forms a square, and along each of its four sides the resistance is given as $$3\;\Omega$$. Resistance of a conductor is directly proportional to its length (for the same material and cross-section). Therefore the total resistance around the complete square is obtained by simply adding the resistances of the four equal sides:

$$R_{\text{square}} = 3\;\Omega + 3\;\Omega + 3\;\Omega + 3\;\Omega = 12\;\Omega.$$

Now the square is reshaped into a perfect circle. The material, length and cross-section of the wire all remain unchanged, so its total resistance also remains unchanged. Hence the resistance of the whole circumference of the new circle is still

$$R_{\text{circle}} = 12\;\Omega.$$

We are asked to find the resistance between two diametrically opposite points on this circle. Choosing those opposite points divides the circle into two equal semicircular arcs. Because the wire is uniform, each semicircle owns exactly half the total length and therefore half the total resistance.

So, the resistance of each semicircle is

$$R_{\text{semi}} = \dfrac{R_{\text{circle}}}{2} = \dfrac{12\;\Omega}{2} = 6\;\Omega.$$

Between the chosen diametrically opposite points, current can travel through either the upper semicircle or the lower semicircle; these two paths connect the same pair of nodes, so they are effectively in parallel.

For two resistors $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$ in parallel, the equivalent resistance is found using the parallel-combination formula

$$\dfrac{1}{R_{\text{eq}}} = \dfrac{1}{R_1} + \dfrac{1}{R_2}.$$

Substituting $$R_1 = R_2 = 6\;\Omega$$ gives

$$\dfrac{1}{R_{\text{eq}}} = \dfrac{1}{6\;\Omega} + \dfrac{1}{6\;\Omega} = \dfrac{2}{6\;\Omega} = \dfrac{1}{3\;\Omega}.$$

Taking the reciprocal yields the equivalent resistance:

$$R_{\text{eq}} = 3\;\Omega.$$

So, the answer is $$3\;\Omega$$.

For a cell with emf $$E$$ and internal resistance $$r$$, the potential difference across a load resistance $$R$$ is $$V = E - Ir = E - \dfrac{V}{R}\cdot r$$, giving $$V = \dfrac{ER}{R+r}$$.

From the first observation ($$V_1 = 1.25\,\text{V}$$, $$R_1 = 5\,\Omega$$): current $$I_1 = 1.25/5 = 0.25\,\text{A}$$, so:

$$E = 1.25 + 0.25r \quad \cdots (1)$$

From the second observation ($$V_2 = 1.0\,\text{V}$$, $$R_2 = 2\,\Omega$$): current $$I_2 = 1.0/2 = 0.5\,\text{A}$$, so:

$$E = 1.0 + 0.5r \quad \cdots (2)$$

Subtracting equation (1) from (2):

$$0 = -0.25 + 0.25r \implies r = 1\,\Omega$$

Substituting back: $$E = 1.25 + 0.25 \times 1 = 1.5\,\text{V}$$.

The emf is given as $$\dfrac{x}{10}\,\text{V}$$, so $$\dfrac{x}{10} = 1.5$$, giving $$x = 15$$.

Let the two resistors have resistances $$R_1$$ and $$R_2$$. Their series combination gives $$s = R_1 + R_2$$, and their parallel combination gives $$p = \frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2}$$.

We are given that $$s = np$$, so $$R_1 + R_2 = n \cdot \frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1 + R_2}$$, which gives $$(R_1 + R_2)^2 = n \cdot R_1 R_2$$.

We know from the AM-GM inequality that for positive real numbers, $$R_1 + R_2 \geq 2\sqrt{R_1 R_2}$$. Squaring both sides, $$(R_1 + R_2)^2 \geq 4 R_1 R_2$$.

Since $$(R_1 + R_2)^2 = n \cdot R_1 R_2$$, we get $$n \cdot R_1 R_2 \geq 4 R_1 R_2$$, which simplifies to $$n \geq 4$$.

The minimum value of $$n = 4$$ is achieved when $$R_1 = R_2$$ (equality condition of AM-GM). We can verify: if $$R_1 = R_2 = R$$, then $$s = 2R$$ and $$p = \frac{R}{2}$$, so $$\frac{s}{p} = \frac{2R}{R/2} = 4$$.

Therefore, the minimum value of $$n$$ is $$\boxed{4}$$.

Two wires of the same length $$l$$ and the same thickness (cross-sectional area $$A$$) have specific resistivities $$\rho_1 = 6\,\Omega\,\text{cm}$$ and $$\rho_2 = 3\,\Omega\,\text{cm}$$. Their resistances are $$R_1 = \frac{\rho_1 l}{A}$$ and $$R_2 = \frac{\rho_2 l}{A}$$.

When connected in parallel, the equivalent resistance is $$\frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} = \frac{A}{\rho_1 l} + \frac{A}{\rho_2 l} = \frac{A}{l}\left(\frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{3}\right) = \frac{A}{l} \cdot \frac{1}{2}$$, so $$R_{eq} = \frac{2l}{A}$$.

The parallel combination of two identical-geometry wires is equivalent to a single conductor of length $$l$$ and cross-section $$2A$$. The effective resistivity satisfies $$R_{eq} = \frac{\rho \cdot l}{2A}$$, giving $$\frac{2l}{A} = \frac{\rho l}{2A}$$, hence $$\rho = 4\,\Omega\,\text{cm}$$.

The value of $$\rho$$ is $$4$$.

The energy dissipated by a resistor is given by $$E = I^2 R t$$.

Given: $$E = 10$$ mJ $$= 10 \times 10^{-3}$$ J, $$I = 2$$ mA $$= 2 \times 10^{-3}$$ A, and $$t = 1$$ s.

Substituting: $$10 \times 10^{-3} = (2 \times 10^{-3})^2 \times R \times 1$$.

$$10 \times 10^{-3} = 4 \times 10^{-6} \times R$$

$$R = \frac{10 \times 10^{-3}}{4 \times 10^{-6}} = \frac{10^{-2}}{4 \times 10^{-6}} = 2500 \; \Omega$$.

The resistance is $$\boxed{2500}$$ $$\Omega$$.

We begin by noting that the electric fuse has to carry the total current drawn by all the appliances that may be switched on together. The current is obtained from power with the well-known relation:

$$P = VI$$

where $$P$$ is the electric power in watts (W), $$V$$ is the supply voltage in volts (V) and $$I$$ is the current in amperes (A). Rearranging the formula, we obtain

$$I = \dfrac{P}{V}$$

To use this expression, we first calculate the total power consumption of the building by adding the power ratings of every device present.

We have 15 bulbs rated at 45 W each. So their combined power is

$$P_1 = 15 \times 45\ \text{W} = 675\ \text{W}$$

Now, 15 bulbs are rated at 100 W each. Hence

$$P_2 = 15 \times 100\ \text{W} = 1500\ \text{W}$$

Next, 15 small fans are rated at 10 W each, giving

$$P_3 = 15 \times 10\ \text{W} = 150\ \text{W}$$

Finally, there are 2 heaters, each of 1 kW. Remembering that $$1\ \text{kW}=1000\ \text{W}$$, we write

$$P_4 = 2 \times 1\ \text{kW} = 2 \times 1000\ \text{W} = 2000\ \text{W}$$

Adding all these powers gives the total power demand:

$$\begin{aligned} P_{\text{total}} &= P_1 + P_2 + P_3 + P_4 \\ &= 675\ \text{W} + 1500\ \text{W} + 150\ \text{W} + 2000\ \text{W} \\ &= 4325\ \text{W} \end{aligned}$$

The supply voltage of the mains is given as 220 V. Substituting $$P_{\text{total}}$$ and $$V=220\ \text{V}$$ in the rearranged power formula, we get the total current:

$$\begin{aligned} I_{\text{total}} &= \dfrac{P_{\text{total}}}{V} \\ &= \dfrac{4325\ \text{W}}{220\ \text{V}} \\ &= 19.659\ \text{A} \end{aligned}$$

Numerically, this equals approximately $$19.7\ \text{A}$$. A fuse is chosen so that its rating is just above the maximum expected current; if it were below, the fuse would blow during normal operation. The next available standard rating higher than $$19.7\ \text{A}$$ is $$20\ \text{A}$$.

Hence, the correct answer is Option D.

We model the torch battery as an ideal emf source $$\mathcal E$$ in series with its internal resistance, which is the resistance of the electrolyte that fills the space between the inner solid rod (radius $$a$$) and the outer cylindrical shell (inner radius $$b$$). Our first task is therefore to calculate this internal resistance, which we shall denote by $$r$$.

To find $$r$$, we remember the differential formula for the resistance of a conductor:

$$dR=\rho\,\dfrac{dl}{A},$$

where $$\rho$$ is the resistivity, $$dl$$ is the infinitesimal length of the current path, and $$A$$ is the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the current.

In the present arrangement the current flows radially outward from the inner rod to the outer shell. Choose an imaginary cylindrical surface of radius $$r$$ (with $$a<r<b$$) and thickness $$dr$$. The current crosses this surface normally, so:

• The path length for the current element is the radial thickness $$dl=dr$$.
• The area normal to the current is the curved area of the cylinder, $$A = 2\pi r\,l$$, where $$l$$ is the length of the battery.

Substituting these into the differential resistance formula, we obtain

$$dR=\rho\,\dfrac{dr}{2\pi r\,l}.$$

To get the total internal resistance, integrate from the inner radius $$a$$ to the outer radius $$b$$:

$$r = \int_{a}^{b}dR = \int_{a}^{b}\rho\,\dfrac{dr}{2\pi r\,l} = \dfrac{\rho}{2\pi l}\int_{a}^{b}\dfrac{dr}{r} = \dfrac{\rho}{2\pi l}\,\Bigl[\ln r\Bigr]_{a}^{b} = \dfrac{\rho}{2\pi l}\,\ln\!\left(\dfrac{b}{a}\right).$$

Now the circuit consists of the emf $$\mathcal E$$, the internal resistance $$r$$ and the external resistance $$R$$ in series. The Joule heating (power) in the external resistor is

$$P=\dfrac{\mathcal E^{2}R}{\left(R+r\right)^{2}}.$$

The maximum power transfer theorem states that, for a fixed internal resistance $$r$$, the power delivered to $$R$$ is maximum when

$$R=r.$$

Therefore, using the explicit form of $$r$$ we just calculated, the condition for maximum Joule heating is

$$R=\dfrac{\rho}{2\pi l}\,\ln\!\left(\dfrac{b}{a}\right).$$

This expression matches Option B.

Hence, the correct answer is Option B.

Equivalent resistance of the parallel $$1\ \Omega$$ pair: $$R_{p1} = \frac{1 \times 1}{1 + 1} = 0.5\ \Omega$$

Total resistance of the top branch connected across the battery: $$R_{\text{top}} = R_{p1} + 2 = 0.5 + 2 = 2.5\ \Omega$$

Total current entering the top branch from the $$1\text{ V}$$ source: $$I_{\text{top}} = \frac{V}{R_{\text{top}}} = \frac{1}{2.5} = 0.4\text{ A}$$

Current $$I_1$$ splitting equally into the identical $$1\ \Omega$$ parallel branch:

$$I_1 = \frac{I_{\text{top}}}{2} = \frac{0.4}{2} = 0.2\text{ A}$$

$$P_{\text{ext}} = V \cdot I \implies 0.5 = 2.5 \cdot I \implies I = \frac{0.5}{2.5} = 0.2\ \text{A}$$

Voltage drop across the internal resistance: 

$$V_{\text{int}} = E - V = 3.0 - 2.5 = 0.5\ \text{V}$$

Power dissipated within the internal resistance:

$$P_{\text{int}} = V_{\text{int}} \cdot I = 0.5\ \text{V} \times 0.2\ \text{A} = 0.10\ \text{W}$$

We begin by recalling the definition of resistivity. For any homogeneous conductor we have the relation

$$R=\rho\,\frac{\ell}{A},$$

where $$R$$ is the resistance of the specimen, $$\ell$$ its length, $$A$$ its cross-sectional area and $$\rho$$ the material‐dependent constant called resistivity. A smaller value of $$\rho$$ therefore corresponds to a better electrical conductor, while a larger value corresponds to a poorer conductor.

The standard tabulated resistivities at room temperature (≈ 20 °C) for the four materials mentioned in the question are:

$$\rho_C \;( \text{copper}) \approx 1.72\times10^{-8}\;\Omega\text{m},$$

$$\rho_A \;( \text{aluminium}) \approx 2.8\times10^{-8}\;\Omega\text{m},$$

$$\rho_T \;( \text{tungsten}) \approx 5.6\times10^{-8}\;\Omega\text{m},$$

$$\rho_M \;( \text{mercury}) \approx 9.5\times10^{-7}\;\Omega\text{m}.$$

Now we arrange these values in descending order (largest first):

$$\rho_M \;>\;\rho_T \;>\;\rho_A \;>\;\rho_C.$$

Next we compare this true order with each option supplied in the problem statement.

A. $$\rho_C > \rho_A > \rho_T$$ contradicts the numerical data because $$\rho_C$$ is the smallest, not the largest.

C. $$\rho_A > \rho_T > \rho_C$$ is also wrong because $$\rho_T$$ is greater than $$\rho_A$$, not the other way round.

D. $$\rho_A > \rho_M > \rho_C$$ is incorrect because $$\rho_M$$ is the largest of all; it cannot be less than $$\rho_A$$.

B. $$\rho_M > \rho_A > \rho_C$$ does not mention tungsten, but it is completely consistent with the accurate ordering of the three quantities that do appear, namely $$\rho_M > \rho_A$$ and $$\rho_A > \rho_C$$. Because the other three options are plainly false, Option B is the only statement that matches the established numerical hierarchy.

Hence, the correct answer is Option B.

Biasing verification based on the $$30\text{ V}$$ battery orientation:

$$\text{Anode connected towards high potential side } \implies \text{Forward-biased (short circuit)}$$

Parallel combination of the two identical resistors branch between A and B: $$R_{AB} = \frac{10 \times 10}{10 + 10} = 5\text{ k}\Omega$$

Total resistance connected to the source network: $$R_{\text{total}} = 10 + R_{AB} = 10 + 5 = 15\text{ k}\Omega$$

Potential difference across the parallel block using the voltage divider rule: $$V_{AB} = V \times \frac{R_{AB}}{R_{\text{total}}} = 30 \times \frac{5}{15} = 10\text{ V}$$

Taking node C as reference: $$V_C = 0 \implies V_A = 20$$

Since points B and D are connected by a wire: $$V_B = V_D = V$$

Kirchhoff's current law at node B + D combined:

$$\frac{V - 20}{1} + \frac{V - 20}{4} + \frac{V - 0}{2} + \frac{V - 0}{3} = 0$$

$$V\left(1 + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3}\right) = 20\left(1 + \frac{1}{4}\right)$$

$$V\left(\frac{12 + 3 + 6 + 4}{12}\right) = 20\left(\frac{5}{4}\right) \implies V\left(\frac{25}{12}\right) = 25 \implies V = 12$$

Currents entering node B from node A and leaving to node C: $$I_{AB} = \frac{20 - 12}{1} = 8$$

$$I_{BC} = \frac{12 - 0}{2} = 6$$

Kirchhoff's current law at node B: $$I_{AB} = I_{BC} + I_{BD} \implies 8 = 6 + I_{BD} \implies I_{BD} = 2$$

We have two resistors, one of resistance $$R_{1}=400\;\Omega$$ and another of resistance $$R_{2}=800\;\Omega$$, connected in series to a battery that maintains a potential difference of $$V=6\text{ V}$$.

During the measurement a voltmeter of internal resistance $$R_{v}=10\ \text{k}\Omega=10000\;\Omega$$ is connected across the 400 $$\Omega$$ resistor. Because the voltmeter is always connected in parallel with the element across which we want to know the potential difference, the 400 $$\Omega$$ resistor and the voltmeter together form a parallel combination.

First we calculate the effective (equivalent) resistance $$R_{p}$$ of the parallel combination of $$R_{1}$$ and $$R_{v}$$. For two resistances in parallel the formula is

$$\frac{1}{R_{p}}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{v}}.$$

Substituting the given values,

$$\frac{1}{R_{p}}=\frac{1}{400}+\frac{1}{10000}.$$

We rewrite each term with the same units (ohms) and keep all steps explicit:

$$\frac{1}{R_{p}}=\frac{1}{400}+\frac{1}{10000} =\frac{25}{10000}+\frac{1}{10000} =\frac{26}{10000}.$$

So

$$R_{p}=\frac{10000}{26}\;\Omega.$$

Performing the division,

$$R_{p}=384.615\;\Omega$$ (to three decimal places).

Now this equivalent resistance $$R_{p}$$ is in series with the untouched 800 $$\Omega$$ resistor. Therefore the total resistance $$R_{T}$$ of the circuit seen by the battery becomes

$$R_{T}=R_{p}+R_{2}=384.615\;\Omega+800\;\Omega=1184.615\;\Omega.$$

With the total resistance known, we make use of Ohm’s law, which states $$I=\dfrac{V}{R}$$, to find the current $$I$$ flowing through the series circuit:

$$I=\frac{6\text{ V}}{1184.615\;\Omega}=0.005067\ \text{A}.$$

Converting amperes to milliamperes for clarity,

$$I=0.005067\ \text{A}=5.067\ \text{mA}.$$

The potential difference across the parallel branch (and hence across both the 400 $$\Omega$$ resistor and the voltmeter, since elements in parallel share the same voltage) is obtained again via Ohm’s law:

$$V_{p}=I\,R_{p}=0.005067\ \text{A}\times384.615\;\Omega.$$

Carrying out the multiplication step by step,

$$V_{p}=0.005067\times384.615 =1.9487\ \text{V}.$$

Rounding to two significant figures that match the options provided,

$$V_{p}\approx1.95\ \text{V}.$$

This is the reading that the voltmeter will register.

Hence, the correct answer is Option D.

We are told that the galvanometer coil has an internal resistance $$G = 100\ \Omega$$ and that it produces full-scale deflection when a current of $$I_g = 1\ \text{mA} = 1\times10^{-3}\ \text{A}$$ flows through it.

To convert this galvanometer into a voltmeter that reads full scale at a potential difference of $$V = 10\ \text{V}$$, we must connect an additional resistance $$R_s$$ in series with the galvanometer. In this series arrangement, the same current $$I_g$$ will still correspond to full-scale deflection, but now the total voltage across the series combination must be $$V$$.

Ohm’s law states that for a resistor, $$V = I R.$$ Applying it to the entire series combination, we have $$V = I_g\,(G + R_s).$$

We substitute the known values: $$10\ \text{V} = (1\times10^{-3}\ \text{A})\,(100\ \Omega + R_s).$$

Now we divide both sides by $$1\times10^{-3}\ \text{A}$$ to isolate the bracket: $$\frac{10}{1\times10^{-3}} = 100\ \Omega + R_s.$$

The left side simplifies because $$\frac{10}{1\times10^{-3}} = 10 \times 10^{3} = 10\,000.$$ So we get $$10\,000\ \Omega = 100\ \Omega + R_s.$$

Next, we subtract $$100\ \Omega$$ from both sides to solve for $$R_s$$: $$R_s = 10\,000\ \Omega - 100\ \Omega.$$

Simplifying the subtraction, $$R_s = 9\,900\ \Omega.$$

Expressing this resistance in kilohms: $$R_s = 9.9\ \text{k}\Omega.$$

Hence, the correct answer is Option D.