Did anyone find the answer to RC very vague in Dashcat? Also insufficient information to know why it is incorrect? @ Cracku, please provide a bit more detailed answer. For your reference please refer Q11, Q13, Q15 of Dashcat 16, there are other option which seems right but explanation is not apt

+1. Most of the reasons are 'this cannot be reason', ' this cannot be inferred', 'this is distort', the whole purpose of analyzing is defeated with such explanation. I hope Cracku takes immediate steps

q

Totally insensible logics are given

Yes, you are right. I have found ambiguity in VARC(RC part) sectionals(4 or 5 of them) and in mocks as well(only some of them) and also in some daily targets. One day out of frustration I mailed them (a long.. one) regarding some questions and they replied asap and assured to correct the vague options. Later, I reported some RC questions in sectionals and they replied fast assuring me they will look into the reported questions. But I think the ambiguity is there only for some mocks. Barring that, almost 70 % is good quality content. The problem is not with the passages but with the options. For some options, the option creator/option setter applies his/her own logic and sometimes fail to meet quality and unambiguity. As for RC, it is quite difficult to create good questions, unlike quant, for there is no best answer in RC, only better options to choose from. Referring to CAT 2017 to 2020 papers will the best estimate on the type/length/LOD of RCs.