Read the following paragraph and answer the question that follows:

When asked what the politician will do for the nation’s economy, he attacked the opponent by saying, “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? I mean, she’s a woman, and I’m not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious? Nevertheless, we’re going to defeat ISIS. ISIS happened a number of years ago in a vacuum that was left because of bad judgment. And I will tell you, I will take care of ISIS.”

Which of the following statements BEST describes the politician’s intent?

To shift focus to ISIS instead of the economy - If this were the sole purpose, the speaker wouldn’t mention the opposing candidate. This choice doesn’t fit.

To target tough-guy voters and instill fear to win them over - While this might seem plausible, the speaker isn’t trying to frighten the audience; he’s aiming to reassure them. This option doesn’t work.

To emotionally connect with voters - This is the correct choice because the speaker taps into the masculine traits of his male listeners and seeks to ease their worries about ISIS with an emotional approach.

To sidetrack and claim security trumps the economy - Although he subtly criticizes the other candidate, this option doesn’t fully capture the speaker’s broader intent.

To make a sexist comment while addressing a key issue - Though it might appear sexist, the speaker avoids a direct remark, noting he’s supposed to be respectful since she’s a woman. This option doesn’t hold up.