Lightning-Fast Doubt Resolution
See how quickly our expert faculties resolve student doubts with detailed explanations
Doubts Resolved (30 Days)
2313
Fastest Response Time
1 minute
Resolution Rate
100%
Recently Resolved Doubts
Real examples showing our commitment to quality education
Resolved in 1m
Summarize the following paragraph:
Rochefoucauld says that love may be compared to a ghost since it is something we talk about but have never seen, and Lichtenberg, in his essay “Ueber die Macht der Liebe”, disputes and denies its reality and naturalness--but both are in the wrong. For if it were foreign to and contradicted human nature - in other words, if it were merely an imaginary caricature, it would not have been depicted with such zeal by the poets of all ages, or accepted by mankind with an unaltered interest; for anything artistically beautiful cannot exist without truth.
why not option 'b'? .
..............................
Resolved in 4m
A statement is followed by two arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments are strong.
Statement: Education must be made mandatory, as it is not only beneficial for health, but it also improves life expectancy in different ways, including “soft” non-financial benefits.
Argument I: Yes, Not attending school at any point is as bad for adult health as consuming five or more alcoholic drinks every day or smoking 10 cigarettes each day for a decade.
Argument II: Yes, Completing primary, secondary and tertiary education is the equivalent of a lifetime of eating a healthy diet, lowering the risk of death by 34% compared with those with no formal education
Aren't both arguments too extreme to be true? I think D should be the answer as extremity makes these arguments really weak. Even though they show a positive correlation to the statement.
Resolved in 5m
School A has 40% more students than School B. School A has $$\dfrac{400}{3}$$% more boys than School B, and the number of girls is the same in both schools. What is the percentage of boys in School A?
i am not able to understand this question through just seeing the solution , is there any possibility that through its explained how this question is solved
Resolved in 6m
A team of 4 has to be selected from A, B, C, D, E and F. A and B are best friends and insist on playing together. A does not get along with C and hence these two cannot be selected together. In how many ways can we form a team?
video solution is different please explain this question
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
Resolved in 7m
In each of the question below are given four statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II III and IV You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
All stones are hammers
No hammer is ring
Some rings are doors
All doors are windows
Conclusions:
I.Some windows are stones
II.Some windows are rings
III.No windows is stone
IV.Some rings are stones
The answer should be II and either I or III is correct. Please reconfirm.
Resolved in 9m
Find the sum of the infinite terms of the series 2/3, 7/18, 23/108, 73/648 and so on till infinity
I dont know the pattern in the given series. I tries to find it our in ways but still i couldn't. Can you tell me how to find the pattern and what is the pattern followed here?
Resolved in 11m
In each question below are two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically commonly follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer a: if only conclusion I follows.
Give answer b: if only conclusion II follows.
Give answer c: if either conclusion I or II follows.
Give answer d: if both conclusions I and II follow.
Give answer e: if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Statements:
Some chapters are units.
Some units are topics.
Conclusions:
I. At least some topics are chapters.
II. Some topics are definitely not units.
Even in the solution provided in this question conclusion 2 follows
please explain why not I cannot get it
Resolved in 13m
In each question below are two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically commonly follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer a: if only conclusion I follows.
Give answer b: if only conclusion II follows.
Give answer c: if either conclusion I or II follows.
Give answer d: if both conclusions I and II follow.
Give answer e: if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Statements:
Some chapters are units.
Some units are topics.
Conclusions:
I. At least some topics are chapters.
II. Some topics are definitely not units.
hi, here the venn diagram can also be the intersection of three of them in that case conclusion 2 follows
please explain
Resolved in 14m
The Ministry of Home Affairs is analysing crimes committed by foreigners in different states and union territories (UT) of India. All cases refer to the ones registered against foreigners in 2016.
The number of cases - classified into three categories: IPC crimes, SLL crimes and other crimes - for nine states/UTs are shown in the figure below. These nine belong to the top ten states/UTs in terms of the total number of cases registered. The remaining state (among top ten) is West Bengal, where all the 520 cases registered were SLL crimes.
The table below shows the ranks of the ten states/UTs mentioned above among ALL states/UTs of India in terms of the number of cases registered in each of the three category of crimes. A state/UT is given rank r for a category of crimes if there are (r‐1) states/UTs having a larger number of cases registered in that category of crimes. For example, if two states have the same number of cases in a category, and exactly three other states/UTs have larger numbers of cases registered in the same category, then both the states are given rank 4 in that category. Missing ranks in the table are denoted by *.
What is the sum of the ranks of Delhi in the three categories of crimes?
Correct Answer: 5
Hi, I see SSL crimes of delhi as 35. This brings delhi at rank 4 same as of Goa and Maharashtra and 3 being any other state outside the ten. But if we take Delhi as 37 thenits rank comes as 3. Why cant it be 35?
Resolved in 14m
If a factor of N is chosen randomly, what is the probability that it is divisible by 6?
N = $$2^63^84^45^4$$
No. Of factors = 15×9×5
Now we have to count, Those factor which are multiple of 6.
For this let do this
2^14 × 3^8 × 5^4,, we can write it as 6^8 × 2^6 ×5^4 that we can count it by basic formula
(6^1 + 6^2+6^3....6^8)(2^0+2^1+2^2+....2^6)(5^0 +5^1+...5^4)
So o calculating no. Of factors of 6. Multtiple is 8×7×5.
Sso for probbability = 56×5/135×5. =56/135..
Where i am wrong pls correct it with detailed answer and why my concept is wrong... which cases are forgotten?
