Mathematical Reasoning Formulas for JEE 2026
Mathematical Reasoning is a fundamental topic in JEE Mains that tests your understanding of logic, proof techniques, and the ability to construct valid mathematical arguments. This chapter includes concepts like statements, logical connectives, truth tables, quantifiers, and methods of proof such as mathematical induction.
In this context, using a JEE Mains Maths Formula PDF can help you quickly revise important concepts and improve your problem-solving speed. These topics are essential tools for solving JEE questions efficiently and scoring well in the exam.
Statements and Negation Formula
Definition: Statement (Proposition)
A statement (or proposition) is a declarative sentence that is either true (T) or false (F), but not both. Statements are usually denoted by $$p$$, $$q$$, $$r$$, etc. The true/false quality is called the truth value of the statement.
Examples and Non-examples of Statements
- "$$2 + 3 = 5$$" β Statement (true)
- "New Delhi is the capital of India" β Statement (true)
- "$$5 > 8$$" β Statement (false)
- "What time is it?" β Not a statement (it's a question)
- "Close the door" β Not a statement (it's a command)
- "$$x + 2 = 5$$" β Not a statement (truth depends on $$x$$; it's an open sentence)
Negation of a Statement
Definition: Negation
The negation of statement $$p$$, written $$\sim p$$ (or $$\lnot p$$), is the statement "$$p$$ is not true." If $$p$$ is T, then $$\sim p$$ is F, and vice versa. In English, you often form the negation by inserting "not" or "it is not the case that."
Negation Truth Table
| $$p$$ | $$\sim p$$ |
|---|---|
| T | F |
| F | T |
Worked Example: Negation
Write the negation of: "Every natural number is greater than zero."
Negation: "There exists a natural number that is not greater than zero."
Note how "every" changed to "there exists" and "greater than" changed to "not greater than." This is a general pattern we'll see with quantifiers.
Logical Connectives Formula
Just as we combine numbers with operations ($$+$$, $$\times$$), we can combine statements using logical connectives to form new, compound statements. The truth value of the compound statement depends on the truth values of its parts.
Conjunction (AND)
Definition: Conjunction
The conjunction of $$p$$ and $$q$$, written $$p \land q$$, is the statement "$$p$$ and $$q$$." It is true only when both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are true.
Conjunction Truth Table
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | $$p \land q$$ |
|---|---|---|
| T | T | T |
| T | F | F |
| F | T | F |
| F | F | F |
Key insight: $$p \land q$$ is false if even one part is false.
Worked Example: Conjunction
Let $$p$$: "$$2$$ is even" (T) and $$q$$: "$$3$$ is even" (F). Find the truth value of $$p \land q$$.
$$p \land q$$: "$$2$$ is even AND $$3$$ is even."
Since $$q$$ is false, $$p \land q$$ is false.
Disjunction (OR)
Definition: Disjunction
The disjunction of $$p$$ and $$q$$, written $$p \lor q$$, is the statement "$$p$$ or $$q$$ (or both)." It is false only when both $$p$$ and $$q$$ are false.
Disjunction Truth Table
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | $$p \lor q$$ |
|---|---|---|
| T | T | T |
| T | F | T |
| F | T | T |
| F | F | F |
Key insight: $$p \lor q$$ is true if at least one part is true. (This is the inclusive or.)
Conditional (IFβ¦THEN)
Definition: Conditional
The conditional $$p \Rightarrow q$$ (read "if $$p$$, then $$q$$") is false only when $$p$$ is true and $$q$$ is false. Here $$p$$ is the hypothesis (or antecedent) and $$q$$ is the conclusion (or consequent).
Conditional Truth Table
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | $$p \Rightarrow q$$ |
|---|---|---|
| T | T | T |
| T | F | F |
| F | T | T |
| F | F | T |
Key insight: A conditional is automatically true when the hypothesis $$p$$ is false ("vacuously true"). The only falsifying case is $$p$$ true, $$q$$ false.
Worked Example: Conditional
Determine the truth value of: "If $$4 > 5$$, then $$10 > 9$$."
Here $$p$$: "$$4 > 5$$" is false. Since the hypothesis is false, $$p \Rightarrow q$$ is true (vacuously true), regardless of $$q$$.
Biconditional (IF AND ONLY IF)
Definition: Biconditional
The biconditional $$p \Leftrightarrow q$$ (read "$$p$$ if and only if $$q$$") is true when $$p$$ and $$q$$ have the same truth value (both true or both false).
Biconditional Truth Table
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | $$p \Leftrightarrow q$$ |
|---|---|---|
| T | T | T |
| T | F | F |
| F | T | F |
| F | F | T |
$$p \Leftrightarrow q$$ is equivalent to $$(p \Rightarrow q) \land (q \Rightarrow p)$$.
Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive Formula
Given a conditional statement $$p \Rightarrow q$$, we can form three related statements. Understanding these is critical because the contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original β a fact used heavily in proofs.
Related Conditional Statements
Given the conditional $$p \Rightarrow q$$:
| Name | Form | Relationship to Original |
|---|---|---|
| Converse | $$q \Rightarrow p$$ | NOT necessarily equivalent |
| Inverse | $$\sim p \Rightarrow \sim q$$ | NOT necessarily equivalent |
| Contrapositive | $$\sim q \Rightarrow \sim p$$ | Always equivalent |
Important: The original and its contrapositive always have the same truth value. The converse and inverse always have the same truth value as each other (but may differ from the original).
Worked Example: Converse, Inverse, and Contrapositive
Given: "If a number is divisible by 6, then it is divisible by 3."
Converse: "If a number is divisible by 3, then it is divisible by 6." (False: 9 is divisible by 3 but not 6.)
Inverse: "If a number is not divisible by 6, then it is not divisible by 3." (False: same counterexample.)
Contrapositive: "If a number is not divisible by 3, then it is not divisible by 6." (True β same truth value as the original.)
Tip: In JEE, when asked to identify the contrapositive, remember: negate both parts and swap. The contrapositive of $$p \Rightarrow q$$ is $$\sim q \Rightarrow \sim p$$.
Tautology and Contradiction Formula
Some compound statements are always true regardless of the truth values of their parts β these are called tautologies. Others are always false β these are called contradictions. Identifying these is a common JEE question.
Definition: Tautology
A compound statement that is true for every possible combination of truth values of its component statements.
Definition: Contradiction
A compound statement that is false for every possible combination of truth values of its component statements.
Standard Examples of Tautologies and Contradictions
- $$p \lor (\sim p)$$ is a tautology (law of excluded middle β every statement is either true or its negation is true)
- $$p \land (\sim p)$$ is a contradiction (a statement cannot be both true and false)
- $$p \Rightarrow p$$ is a tautology
- $$(p \Rightarrow q) \Leftrightarrow (\sim q \Rightarrow \sim p)$$ is a tautology (a statement and its contrapositive are equivalent)
Worked Example: Verifying a Tautology
Show that $$p \lor (\sim p)$$ is a tautology using a truth table.
| $$p$$ | $$\sim p$$ | $$p \lor (\sim p)$$ |
|---|---|---|
| T | F | T |
| F | T | T |
The last column is always T, so $$p \lor (\sim p)$$ is a tautology.
Worked Example: Is $$(p \Rightarrow q) \lor (q \Rightarrow p)$$ a Tautology?
| $$p$$ | $$q$$ | $$p \Rightarrow q$$ | $$q \Rightarrow p$$ | $$(p \Rightarrow q) \lor (q \Rightarrow p)$$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | T |
| F | F | T | T | T |
Always T β so yes, it is a tautology.
Quantifiers Formula
Quantifiers tell us "how many" objects a statement applies to. The two fundamental quantifiers are "for all" (universal) and "there exists" (existential). Understanding how to negate quantified statements is essential for JEE.
Definition: Universal Quantifier ($$\forall$$)
"For all" or "for every." The statement $$\forall x, \, P(x)$$ means $$P(x)$$ is true for every $$x$$ in the domain.
Definition: Existential Quantifier ($$\exists$$)
"There exists" or "for some." The statement $$\exists x, \, P(x)$$ means there is at least one $$x$$ in the domain for which $$P(x)$$ is true.
Negation of Quantified Statements
- $$\sim (\forall x, \, P(x)) \equiv \exists x, \, \sim P(x)$$
("Not all $$x$$ satisfy $$P$$" means "there exists an $$x$$ that does not satisfy $$P$$.") - $$\sim (\exists x, \, P(x)) \equiv \forall x, \, \sim P(x)$$
("There does not exist an $$x$$ satisfying $$P$$" means "no $$x$$ satisfies $$P$$.")
Rule: When negating, $$\forall$$ becomes $$\exists$$ and vice versa, and the predicate is negated.
Worked Example: Negating a Quantified Statement
Negate: "All prime numbers are odd."
The statement is: $$\forall x$$ (if $$x$$ is prime, then $$x$$ is odd).
Negation: $$\exists x$$ such that $$x$$ is prime and $$x$$ is not odd.
In plain English: "There exists a prime number that is not odd." (This is actually true β the number 2.)
Tip: When negating "ifβ¦then" inside a quantifier: $$\sim(p \Rightarrow q) \equiv p \land (\sim q)$$. So "not (if $$p$$ then $$q$$)" becomes "$$p$$ and not $$q$$."
Methods of Proof Formula
A proof is a logical argument that establishes the truth of a statement beyond doubt. Different situations call for different proof strategies. JEE tests your understanding of these methods.
Direct Proof
To prove $$p \Rightarrow q$$:
- Assume $$p$$ is true.
- Use definitions, axioms, and previously known results.
- Through a chain of logical implications, arrive at $$q$$.
- Conclude: since $$p$$ implies $$q$$, the statement is proved.
Worked Example: Direct Proof
Prove: "If $$n$$ is even, then $$n^2$$ is even."
Assume $$n$$ is even. By definition, $$n = 2k$$ for some integer $$k$$.
Then $$n^2 = (2k)^2 = 4k^2 = 2(2k^2)$$.
Since $$2k^2$$ is an integer, $$n^2 = 2 \times (\text{integer})$$, so $$n^2$$ is even. $$\square$$
Proof by Contradiction
To prove statement $$p$$:
- Assume $$\sim p$$ (the negation of $$p$$).
- Use logical reasoning to derive a contradiction (e.g., $$q \land \sim q$$).
- Since the assumption $$\sim p$$ leads to a contradiction, $$\sim p$$ must be false.
- Therefore $$p$$ is true.
Worked Example: Proof by Contradiction
Prove that $$\sqrt{2}$$ is irrational.
Assume $$\sqrt{2}$$ is rational. Then $$\sqrt{2} = \dfrac{a}{b}$$ where $$a, b$$ are integers with no common factor (i.e., the fraction is in lowest terms) and $$b \neq 0$$.
Squaring: $$2 = \dfrac{a^2}{b^2}$$, so $$a^2 = 2b^2$$.
This means $$a^2$$ is even, so $$a$$ must be even. Write $$a = 2k$$.
Then $$(2k)^2 = 2b^2 \Rightarrow 4k^2 = 2b^2 \Rightarrow b^2 = 2k^2$$.
So $$b^2$$ is even, meaning $$b$$ is also even.
Contradiction: Both $$a$$ and $$b$$ are even, so they share the common factor 2. But we assumed $$a/b$$ was in lowest terms.
Therefore, $$\sqrt{2}$$ is irrational. $$\square$$
Proof by Contrapositive
To prove $$p \Rightarrow q$$:
- Instead prove $$\sim q \Rightarrow \sim p$$.
- Assume $$\sim q$$ (the conclusion is false).
- Use logical reasoning to derive $$\sim p$$ (the hypothesis is false).
- This proves $$p \Rightarrow q$$.
Worked Example: Proof by Contrapositive
Prove: "If $$n^2$$ is even, then $$n$$ is even."
Contrapositive: "If $$n$$ is not even (i.e., $$n$$ is odd), then $$n^2$$ is not even (i.e., $$n^2$$ is odd)."
Assume $$n$$ is odd: $$n = 2k + 1$$ for some integer $$k$$.
$$n^2 = (2k+1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 = 2(2k^2 + 2k) + 1$$
Since $$2k^2 + 2k$$ is an integer, $$n^2$$ is odd. $$\square$$
Mathematical Induction Formula
Mathematical induction is a powerful proof technique for statements about natural numbers. The idea is like dominos falling: if the first domino falls (base case) and each falling domino knocks down the next (inductive step), then all dominos fall.
Principle of Mathematical Induction (PMI)
Let $$P(n)$$ be a statement about natural number $$n$$. If:
- Base case: $$P(1)$$ is true, and
- Inductive step: For any $$k \geq 1$$, $$P(k)$$ true $$\Rightarrow$$ $$P(k+1)$$ true,
then $$P(n)$$ is true for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$.
Steps for Proof by Induction
- State $$P(n)$$: clearly write what you want to prove for all $$n$$.
- Base case: Verify $$P(1)$$ (or the smallest relevant value) is true by direct computation.
- Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$ is true for some arbitrary $$k \geq 1$$.
- Inductive step: Using the assumption that $$P(k)$$ is true, prove that $$P(k+1)$$ is true.
- Conclude: By PMI, $$P(n)$$ is true for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$.
Summation Proofs by Induction
Worked Example: Sum of First $$n$$ Natural Numbers
Prove by induction: $$1 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n = \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$.
Let $$P(n)$$: $$\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n} i = \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}$$.
Base case ($$n = 1$$): LHS $$= 1$$. RHS $$= \dfrac{1 \times 2}{2} = 1$$. LHS $$=$$ RHS. β
Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$ is true: $$1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \dfrac{k(k+1)}{2}$$.
Inductive step: Prove $$P(k+1)$$: $$1 + 2 + \cdots + k + (k+1) = \dfrac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}$$.
LHS $$= \underbrace{1 + 2 + \cdots + k}_{\text{use } P(k)} + (k+1) = \dfrac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1)$$
$$= (k+1)\left(\dfrac{k}{2} + 1\right) = (k+1) \cdot \dfrac{k+2}{2} = \dfrac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}$$ = RHS. β
By PMI, $$P(n)$$ is true for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$. $$\square$$
Worked Example: Sum of Squares
Prove by induction: $$1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 + \cdots + n^2 = \dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$$.
Let $$P(n)$$: $$\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n} i^2 = \dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$$.
Base case ($$n = 1$$): LHS $$= 1$$. RHS $$= \dfrac{1 \times 2 \times 3}{6} = 1$$. β
Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$: $$1^2 + 2^2 + \cdots + k^2 = \dfrac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}$$.
Inductive step: Prove $$P(k+1)$$.
LHS $$= \dfrac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} + (k+1)^2 = (k+1)\left[\dfrac{k(2k+1)}{6} + (k+1)\right]$$
$$= (k+1) \cdot \dfrac{k(2k+1) + 6(k+1)}{6} = (k+1) \cdot \dfrac{2k^2 + k + 6k + 6}{6}$$
$$= (k+1) \cdot \dfrac{2k^2 + 7k + 6}{6} = (k+1) \cdot \dfrac{(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$$
$$= \dfrac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6} = \dfrac{(k+1)((k+1)+1)(2(k+1)+1)}{6}$$ = RHS. β
By PMI, the result holds for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$. $$\square$$
Divisibility Proofs by Induction
Worked Example: $$7^n - 1$$ is Divisible by 6
Prove by induction: $$7^n - 1$$ is divisible by $$6$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$.
Let $$P(n)$$: $$6 \mid (7^n - 1)$$.
Base case ($$n = 1$$): $$7^1 - 1 = 6$$, which is divisible by 6. β
Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$: $$7^k - 1 = 6m$$ for some integer $$m$$.
Inductive step: Prove $$6 \mid (7^{k+1} - 1)$$.
$$7^{k+1} - 1 = 7 \cdot 7^k - 1 = 7(7^k - 1) + 7 - 1 = 7(7^k - 1) + 6$$
By the inductive hypothesis, $$7^k - 1 = 6m$$, so:
$$7^{k+1} - 1 = 7(6m) + 6 = 6(7m + 1)$$
Since $$7m + 1$$ is an integer, $$7^{k+1} - 1$$ is divisible by 6. β
By PMI, $$6 \mid (7^n - 1)$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$. $$\square$$
Worked Example: $$n^3 - n$$ is Divisible by 3
Prove by induction: $$n^3 - n$$ is divisible by $$3$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$.
Let $$P(n)$$: $$3 \mid (n^3 - n)$$.
Base case ($$n = 1$$): $$1^3 - 1 = 0$$, and $$3 \mid 0$$. β
Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$: $$k^3 - k = 3m$$ for some integer $$m$$.
Inductive step: Prove $$3 \mid ((k+1)^3 - (k+1))$$.
$$(k+1)^3 - (k+1) = k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1 - k - 1$$
$$= (k^3 - k) + 3k^2 + 3k = (k^3 - k) + 3(k^2 + k)$$
By inductive hypothesis, $$k^3 - k = 3m$$, so:
$$(k+1)^3 - (k+1) = 3m + 3(k^2 + k) = 3(m + k^2 + k)$$
Since $$m + k^2 + k$$ is an integer, the expression is divisible by 3. β
By PMI, $$3 \mid (n^3 - n)$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$. $$\square$$
Inequality Proofs by Induction
Worked Example: $$2^n > n$$
Prove by induction: $$2^n > n$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$.
Let $$P(n)$$: $$2^n > n$$.
Base case ($$n = 1$$): $$2^1 = 2 > 1$$. β
Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$: $$2^k > k$$ for some $$k \geq 1$$.
Inductive step: Prove $$2^{k+1} > k + 1$$.
$$2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot k = 2k$$ (using the inductive hypothesis)
Now we need $$2k \geq k + 1$$, i.e., $$k \geq 1$$, which is true for all $$k \in \mathbb{N}$$.
So $$2^{k+1} > 2k \geq k + 1$$, giving $$2^{k+1} > k + 1$$. β
By PMI, $$2^n > n$$ for all $$n \in \mathbb{N}$$. $$\square$$
Worked Example: $$n! > 2^n$$ for $$n \geq 4$$
Prove by induction: $$n! > 2^n$$ for all $$n \geq 4$$.
Let $$P(n)$$: $$n! > 2^n$$ for $$n \geq 4$$.
Base case ($$n = 4$$): $$4! = 24$$ and $$2^4 = 16$$. Since $$24 > 16$$, $$P(4)$$ is true. β
Inductive hypothesis: Assume $$P(k)$$: $$k! > 2^k$$ for some $$k \geq 4$$.
Inductive step: Prove $$(k+1)! > 2^{k+1}$$.
$$(k+1)! = (k+1) \cdot k! > (k+1) \cdot 2^k$$ (using the inductive hypothesis)
Since $$k \geq 4$$, we have $$k + 1 \geq 5 > 2$$, so:
$$(k+1) \cdot 2^k > 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1}$$
Therefore $$(k+1)! > 2^{k+1}$$. β
By PMI, $$n! > 2^n$$ for all $$n \geq 4$$. $$\square$$
Tip: In JEE problems on induction, the most common mistakes are: (1) forgetting to verify the base case, (2) assuming $$P(k+1)$$ instead of proving it, and (3) not clearly using the inductive hypothesis in the inductive step. Always label each step clearly.
Common Induction Results for JEE
| Statement $$P(n)$$ | Valid for |
|---|---|
| $$1 + 2 + \cdots + n = \dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}$$ | $$n \geq 1$$ |
| $$1^2 + 2^2 + \cdots + n^2 = \dfrac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$$ | $$n \geq 1$$ |
| $$1^3 + 2^3 + \cdots + n^3 = \left[\dfrac{n(n+1)}{2}\right]^2$$ | $$n \geq 1$$ |
| $$2^n > n$$ | $$n \geq 1$$ |
| $$2^n > n^2$$ | $$n \geq 5$$ |
| $$n! > 2^n$$ | $$n \geq 4$$ |
| $$n^2 \leq 2^n$$ | $$n \geq 1$$ (except $$n = 3$$) |
Mathematical Reasoning Formulas for JEE 2026: Conclusion
The syllabus includes at least one most scoring and concept-based topic, Mathematical Reasoning Formulas for JEE 2026. This chapter is a lot easier to deal with once you have mastered the fundamentals of statements, negation, logical connectives, truth tables, quantifiers, and methods of proofs. The questions in this topic are mostly straightforward and would need to be clearer as opposed to lengthy calculations, thus a good subject to score quick marks on the exam.
To achieve good marks in Mathematical Reasoning to JEE 2026 students are advised to practice all formulae, logic rules, truth tables, and standard induction results regularly. Pay attention to the mastery of such concepts as converse, inverse, contrapositive, tautology, contradiction, and step of mathematical induction. This chapter can turn out to be one of the least challenging and trustworthy scoring regions in the JEE 2026 with a proper revision and practice.
Group