In making decisions about important questions it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments ‘Weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question
Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered (A) (B) and (C) You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument
Statement:Should all the deemed universities be derecognised and attached to any of the central or state universities in India ?
(A)Yes many of these deemed universities do not conform to the required standards of a full fledged university and hence the level of education is compromised
(B)No these deemed universities have been able to introduce innovative courses suitable to the requirement of various industries as they are free from strict Government controls
(C)Yes many such universities are basically money spinning activities and education takes a backseat in these institutions
Deemed universities have autonomy with respect to their functioning.
They are not bound to conform to the norms laid down by goverment.
Also, they have their own fees structure and charge substantially more than state and central universities.
These two arguments are strongly in favor of derecognition of these universities and bringing them under state and central universities.
Create a FREE account and get: