In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement : Should children be allowed to use smartphones?
Argument I : No, Smartphones are addictive, they reduce study time and play time.
Argument II : Yes, The future is about technology. The sooner the children learn how to use technology the better for their and society's future