In each of the following questions, two/ three statements
followed by two Conclusions numbered I and II have been given. You have to take
the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given Conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer a: if both the Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow
Give answer b: if either Conclusion I or Conclusion II follows
Give answer c: if neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows
Give answer d: if only Conclusion I follows
Give answer e: if-only Conclusion II follows
Statements :
All policies are decisions.
No decision is a verdict.
No verdict is a result.
Conclusions :
I. All results being policies is a possibility.
II. No verdict is a policy.
As no decision is a verdict, any subset of decision will also not overlap with the set verdict. Hence, no policy is a verdict or no verdict is a policy. Hence, Conclusion II follows from the statements.
As no information has been given about the overlap between the sets results and policies, all results being policies is a possibility. Hence, even Conclusion I follows.
Create a FREE account and get:
