A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Should gymnastics be made compulsory in schools?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it would help in overall development of a child.
II. No, it is unnecessary waste of time and energy. Children should be sent to extra coaching classes.
Yes, including gymnastics will help in overall development of a child by teaching them sports ethics and also making them fit so is implicit. But conclusion II is not in line with the statement as it is not an waste of time and extra amount of coaching will overburden a child and also stunt his abilities.
Option B is correct.
Create a FREE account and get: