CUET PG COQP12 Previous Paper (2023 Shift-2)

Option C is the correct answer.

In the given context of the passage, it is mentioned that people came from all places to seek the Wazir’s judgement. The Wazir was known for his wisdom and fair judgement, which is why he was sought after by people from various regions. This implies that he was a ‘wise judge’ (Statement E). The other characteristics such as being ‘very famous’ (Statement A), an ‘old judge’ (Statement B), an ‘old Wazir’ (Statement C), or a ‘very patient listener’ (Statement D) are not explicitly stated in the context. Therefore, these statements do not form the basis for people seeking his judgment. Hence, the correct answer is ‘E only’ (Option C). This is because people were drawn to him due to his reputation as a wise judge and not necessarily because of the other characteristics mentioned in the statements.

The correct answer is option D.

The story demonstrates the wisdom and intelligence of the judge, who used a clever method to determine the true owner of the horse.

The other statements do not directly relate to the main point of the story. The beauty of the horse (Statement D) is  mentioned, but it’s not what the story proves. The cleverness of the court (Statement A) or the horse (Statement C) is not demonstrated in the story. While the judge (Statement B) used a clever method, the emphasis of the story is more on his wisdom and intelligence (Statement E). Therefore, the answer is E only.

The correct answer is Option D.

The story suggests that the tall man was impressed by the Wazir’s wisdom in determining the horse's true owner.

The other options (A, C, D, E) are not supported by the details of the story. The tall man was not consoled, embarrassed, undecided, or confused, according to the information provided. Therefore, the answer is Option D, which states B only.

Option B is the correct answer.

Arresting the Other Man (Statement A): The other man's arrest was a consequence of the Wazir’s discovery, not the method of discovery itself. Therefore, statement A is incorrect.

From the Appearance and Good Manners of the Tall Man (Statement B): While the Wazir did note the tall man’s appearance and manners, he did not base his decision solely on these observations. He used them as initial impressions but sought further evidence to make his judgement. Therefore, statement B is incorrect.

By Patiently Listening to the Case of Theft (Statement C): Although the Wazir patiently listened to the case, the listening itself did not reveal the true owner. The discovery was made by observing whom the horse followed. Therefore, statement C is incorrect.

Knowing Whom the Horse Followed (Statement D): This is the key piece of evidence that led the Wazir to the real owner. The horse chose to follow the tall man, indicating a familiarity and bond that typically exists between a pet and its owner.

Leaving the Horse Free (Statement E): The Wazir left the horse free, but this action alone didn’t reveal the true owner. It was a method of gathering more information.

While both actions (D and E) were part of Wazir’s process, the actual discovery of the real owner came from knowing whom the horse
followed (Statement D). Therefore, the correct answer is Option b) D only.

Option A is the correct answer.

Although the passage doesn't explicitly describe the other man, it could be inferred from the story that the tall man was described as well-dressed and soft-spoken, implying that the other man had contrasting characteristics.

The story does not provide information about the other man’s build or manners, so options b), c), and d) are less likely.

The correct answer is option C.

• A. Retreat matches with II. Advance. These are antonyms; ‘retreat’ means to move back or withdraw, while ‘advance’ means to move forward.
• B. Vivacious matches with I. Languid. These are antonyms; ‘vivacious’ means lively and energetic, while ‘languid’ refers to displaying a disinclination for physical exertion or effort; slow and relaxed.
• C. Evidence matches with III. Confutation. ‘Evidence’ supports a claim or argument, while ‘confutation’ refers to the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false.
• D. Exult matches with IV. Lament. These are antonyms; ‘exult’ means showing elation or jubilation, especially as the result of a success, while ‘lament’ is an expression of grief or sorrow.

Option B is the correct answer.

1. Schism—Split: The term ‘Schism’ refers to a division or split, especially one into two groups, caused by a disagreement about ideas, particularly in a religious organization. This is why it matches ‘Split’ from List II.

2. Quixotic—Unrealistic: ‘Quixotic’ is an adjective that describes someone who is overly idealistic, unrealistic, or impractical. It’s often used to describe people who pursue noble ideals but in an infeasible or unrealistic way. Hence, it matches ‘Unrealistic’ from List II.

3. Relegate—Demote: ‘Relegate’ is a verb that means to assign an inferior rank or position to someone or something. It involves lowering someone or something in rank or position. Therefore, it matches with ‘Demote’ from List II.

4. Incognito—Secretly: ‘Incognito’ is an adjective that describes someone who avoids recognition, usually by changing their name or appearance. It’s often used when someone wants to remain anonymous or secret. Therefore, it matches ‘Secretly’ from List II.

Option B is the correct answer.

The original sentence is: "Holding the fatal telegram in her closed first, the distraught mother fell back on the couch."

Option b) suggests: "The distraught mother fell on the couch."

"Fell on" means to collapse or drop onto a surface, which accurately reflects what the mother did in the context of the sentence. The telegram caused her distress, leading her to collapse onto the couch. This option effectively conveys the same meaning as the original sentence without altering it significantly. Thus, option b) is the appropriate substitution.

Note: There is typographical error in the question in the original CUET question paper

Option B is the correct answer.

The error in part 2 should be corrected. "Convinced with" is incorrect and should be "convinced of." Therefore, the correct sentence is "The principal was convinced of his innocence in the act." The answer is 2.