{"id":60173,"date":"2025-02-20T09:51:11","date_gmt":"2025-02-20T04:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/?p=60173"},"modified":"2025-02-24T10:58:07","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T05:28:07","slug":"cat-2020-varc-question-paper-slot-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/cat-2020-varc-question-paper-slot-1\/","title":{"rendered":"CAT 2020 VARC Question Paper (Slot-1) PDF"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 CAT 2020 VARC Question Paper (Slot-1)<\/span><\/p>\n

Download CAT 2020 VARC Slot-1 Questions PDF with detailed solutions. Practice Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension Slot-1 Questions asked in the CAT exam to understand the type and level of questions asked in the exam.
\n

Download CAT 2020 VARC Question Paper (Slot-1) PDF<\/a><\/p><\/p>\n

CAT Mock Tests<\/a><\/p>\n

Instructions<\/b><\/p>\n

The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The word \u2018anarchy\u2019 comes from the Greek ‘anarkhia<\/em>‘, meaning contrary to authority or without a ruler, and was used in a derogatory sense until 1840, when it was adopted by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to describe his political and social ideology. Proudhon argued that organization without government was both possible and desirable. In the evolution of political ideas, anarchism can be seen as an ultimate projection of both liberalism and socialism, and the differing strands of anarchist thought can be related to their emphasis on one or the other of these.<\/p>\n

Historically, anarchism arose not only as an explanation of the gulf between the rich and the poor in any community, and of the reason why the poor have been obliged to fight for their share of a common inheritance, but as a radical answer to the question \u2018What went wrong?\u2019 that followed the ultimate outcome of the French Revolution. It had ended not only with a reign of terror and the emergence of a newly rich ruling caste, but with a new adored emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, strutting through his conquered territories.<\/p>\n

The anarchists and their precursors were unique on the political Left in affirming that workers and peasants, grasping the chance that arose to bring an end to centuries of exploitation and tyranny, were inevitably betrayed by the new class of politicians, whose first priority was to re-establish a centralized state power. After every revolutionary uprising, usually won at a heavy cost for ordinary populations, the new rulers had no hesitation in applying violence and terror, a secret police, and a professional army to maintain their control.<\/p>\n

For anarchists the state itself is the enemy, and they have applied the same interpretation to the outcome of every revolution of the 19th and 20th centuries. This is not merely because every state keeps a watchful and sometimes punitive eye on its dissidents, but because every state protects the privileges of the powerful.<\/p>\n

The mainstream of anarchist propaganda for more than a century has been anarchist- communism, which argues that property in land, natural resources, and the means of production should be held in mutual control by local communities, federating for innumerable joint purposes with other communes. It differs from state socialism in opposing the concept of any central authority. Some anarchists prefer to distinguish between anarchist-communism and collectivist anarchism in order to stress the obviously desirable freedom of an individual or family to possess the resources needed for living, while not implying the right to own the resources needed by others. . . .<\/p>\n

There are, unsurprisingly, several traditions of individualist anarchism, one of them deriving from the \u2018conscious egoism\u2019 of the German writer Max Stirner (1806-56), and another from a remarkable series of 19th-century American figures who argued that in protecting our own autonomy and associating with others for common advantages, we are promoting the good of all. These thinkers differed from free-market liberals in their absolute mistrust of American capitalism, and in their emphasis on mutualism.<\/p>\n

Download Free MBA Preparation App<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n


\nQuestion 1:\u00a0<\/b>The author makes all of the following arguments in the passage, EXCEPT:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0The failure of the French Revolution was because of its betrayal by the new class of politicians who emerged from it.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0For anarchists, the state is the enemy because all states apply violence and terror to maintain their control.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Individualist anarchism is actually constituted of many streams, all of which focus on the autonomy of the individual.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0The popular perception of anarchism as espousing lawlessness and violence comes from a mainstream mistrust of collectivism.<\/p>\n

Question 2:\u00a0<\/b>The author believes that the new ruling class of politicians betrayed the principles of the French Revolution, but does not specify in what way. In the context of the passage, which statement below is the likeliest explanation of that betrayal?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0The new ruling class was constituted mainly of anarchists who were against the destructive impact of the Revolution on the market.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0The anarchists did not want a new ruling class, but were not politically strong enough to stop them.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0The new ruling class struck a deal with the old ruling class to share power between them.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0The new ruling class rode to power on the strength of the workers\u2019 revolutionary anger, but then turned to oppress that very class.<\/p>\n

Question 3:\u00a0<\/b>Which one of the following best expresses the similarity between American individualist anarchists and free-market liberals as well as the difference between the former and the latter?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Both prioritise individual autonomy; but the former also emphasise mutual dependence, while the latter do not do so.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Both reject the regulatory power of the state; but the former favour a people\u2019s state, while the latter favour state intervention in markets.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Both have sophisticated arguments for capitalism; but the former argue for a morally upright capitalism, while the latter argue that the market is the only morality<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Both are founded on the moral principles of altruism; but the latter conceive of the market as a force too mystical for the former to comprehend.<\/p>\n

CAT Online Coaching<\/a><\/p>
\nQuestion 4:\u00a0<\/b>Of the following sets of concepts, identify the set that is conceptually closest to the concerns of the passage.<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Anarchism, State, Individual, Freedom.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Revolution, State, Strike, Egoism.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Revolution, State, Protection, Liberals.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Anarchism, Betrayal, Power, State.<\/p>\n

Question 5:\u00a0<\/b>According to the passage, what is the one idea that is common to all forms of anarchism?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0They all derive from the work of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0They are all opposed to the centralisation of power in the state.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0They all focus on the primacy of the power of the individual.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0There is no idea common to all forms of anarchism; that is why it is anarchic.<\/p>\n

Instructions<\/b><\/p>\n

The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Few realise that the government of China, governing an empire of some 60 million people during the Tang dynasty (618-907), implemented a complex financial system that recognised grain, coins and textiles as money. . . . Coins did have certain advantages: they were durable, recognisable and provided a convenient medium of exchange, especially for smaller transactions. However, there were also disadvantages. A continuing shortage of copper meant that government mints could not produce enough coins for the entire empire, to the extent that for most of the dynasty\u2019s history, coins constituted only a tenth of the money supply. One of the main objections to calls for taxes to be paid in coin was that peasant producers who could weave cloth or grow grain – the other two major currencies of the Tang – would not be able to produce coins, and therefore would not be able to pay their taxes. . . .<\/p>\n

As coins had advantages and disadvantages, so too did textiles. If in circulation for a long period of time, they could show signs of wear and tear. Stained, faded and torn bolts of textiles had less value than a brand new bolt. Furthermore, a full bolt had a particular value. If consumers cut textiles into smaller pieces to buy or sell something worth less than a full bolt, that, too, greatly lessened the value of the textiles. Unlike coins, textiles could not be used for small transactions; as [an official] noted, textiles could not \u201cbe exchanged by the foot and the inch\u201d . . .<\/p>\n

But textiles had some advantages over coins. For a start, textile production was widespread and there were fewer problems with the supply of textiles. For large transactions, textiles weighed less than their equivalent in coins since a string of coins . . . could weigh as much as 4 kg. Furthermore, the dimensions of a bolt of silk held remarkably steady from the third to the tenth century: 56 cm wide and 12 m long . . . The values of different textiles were also more stable than the fluctuating values of coins. . . .<\/p>\n

The government also required the use of textiles for large transactions. Coins, on the other hand, were better suited for smaller transactions, and possibly, given the costs of transporting coins, for a more local usage. Grain, because it rotted easily, was not used nearly as much as coins and textiles, but taxpayers were required to pay grain to the government as a share of their annual tax obligations, and official salaries were expressed in weights of grain. . . .<\/p>\n

In actuality, our own currency system today has some similarities even as it is changing in front of our eyes. . . . We have cash – coins for small transactions like paying for parking at a meter, and banknotes for other items; cheques and debit\/credit cards for other, often larger, types of payments. At the same time, we are shifting to electronic banking and making payments online. Some young people never use cash [and] do not know how to write a cheque . . .<\/p>\n

Join 30K MBA Aspirants Telegram Group<\/a><\/p>
\nQuestion 6:\u00a0<\/b>During the Tang period, which one of the following would not be an economically sound decision for a small purchase in the local market that is worth one-eighth of a bolt of cloth?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Making the payment with the appropriate weight of grain.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Paying with a faded bolt of cloth that has approximately the same value.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Using coins issued by the government to make the payment.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Cutting one-eighth of the fabric from a new bolt to pay the amount.<\/p>\n

Question 7:\u00a0<\/b>When discussing textiles as currency in the Tang period, the author uses the words \u201csteady\u201d and \u201cstable\u201d to indicate all of the following EXCEPT:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0reliable transportation.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0reliable quality.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0reliable measurements.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0reliable supply.<\/p>\n

Question 8:\u00a0<\/b>In the context of the passage, which one of the following can be inferred with regard to the use of currency during the Tang era?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Currency that deteriorated easily was not used for official work.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Copper coins were more valuable and durable than textiles.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Grains were the most used currency because of government requirements.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Currency usage was similar to that of modern times.<\/p>\n

Question 9:\u00a0<\/b>According to the passage, the modern currency system shares all the following features with that of the Tang, EXCEPT that:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0it uses different materials as currency.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0it uses different currencies for different situations.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0its currencies fluctuate in value over time.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0it is undergoing transformation.<\/p>\n

How to prepare for RC<\/a><\/p>\n

How to prepare for PJ and Odd one out<\/a><\/p>\n


\nInstructions<\/b><\/p>\n

The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Vocabulary used in speech or writing organizes itself in seven parts of speech (eight, if you count interjections such as Oh! and Gosh! and Fuhgeddaboudit!). Communication composed of these parts of speech must be organized by rules of grammar upon which we agree. When these rules break down, confusion and misunderstanding result. Bad grammar produces bad sentences. My favorite example from Strunk and White is this one: \u201cAs a mother of five, with another one on the way, my ironing board is always up.\u201d<\/p>\n

Nouns and verbs are the two indispensable parts of writing. Without one of each, no group of words can be a sentence, since a sentence is, by definition, a group of words containing a subject (noun) and a predicate (verb); these strings of words begin with a capital letter, end with a period, and combine to make a complete thought which starts in the writer\u2019s head and then leaps to the reader\u2019s.<\/p>\n

Must you write complete sentences each time, every time? Perish the thought. If your work consists only of fragments and floating clauses, the Grammar Police aren\u2019t going to come and take you away. Even William Strunk, that Mussolini of rhetoric, recognized the delicious pliability of language. \u201cIt is an old observation,\u201d he writes, \u201cthat the best writers sometimes disregard the rules of rhetoric.\u201d Yet he goes on to add this thought, which I urge you to consider: \u201cUnless he is certain of doing well, [the writer] will probably do best to follow the rules.\u201d<\/p>\n

The telling clause here is Unless he is certain of doing well. If you don\u2019t have a rudimentary grasp of how the parts of speech translate into coherent sentences, how can you be certain that you are doing well? How will you know if you\u2019re doing ill, for that matter? The answer, of course, is that you can\u2019t, you won\u2019t. One who does grasp the rudiments of grammar finds a comforting simplicity at its heart, where there need be only nouns, the words that name, and verbs, the words that act.<\/p>\n

Take any noun, put it with any verb, and you have a sentence. It never fails. Rocks explode. Jane transmits. Mountains float. These are all perfect sentences. Many such thoughts make little rational sense, but even the stranger ones (Plums deify!) have a kind of poetic weight that\u2019s nice. The simplicity of noun-verb construction is useful\u2014at the very least it can provide a safety net for your writing. Strunk and White caution against too many simple sentences in a row, but simple sentences provide a path you can follow when you fear getting lost in the tangles of rhetoric\u2014all those restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses, those modifying phrases, those appositives and compound-complex sentences. If you start to freak out at the sight of such unmapped territory (unmapped by you, at least), just remind yourself that rocks explode, Jane transmits, mountains float, and plums deify. Grammar is . . . the pole you grab to get your thoughts up on their feet and walking.<\/p>\n

Question 10:\u00a0<\/b>Which one of the following statements, if false, could be seen as supporting the arguments in the passage?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0An understanding of grammar helps a writer decide if she\/he is writing well or not.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Regarding grammar, women writers tend to be more attentive to method and
\naccuracy.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0It has been observed that writers sometimes disregard the rules of rhetoric.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Perish the thought that complete sentences necessarily need nouns and verbs!<\/p>\n

Question 11:\u00a0<\/b>\u201cTake any noun, put it with any verb, and you have a sentence. It never fails. Rocks explode. Jane transmits. Mountains float.\u201d None of the following statements can be seen as similar EXCEPT:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Take any vegetable, put some spices in it, and you have a dish<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Take an apple tree, plant it in a field, and you have an orchard.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0A group of nouns arranged in a row becomes a sentence.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0A collection of people with the same sports equipment is a sports team.<\/p>\n

Question 12:\u00a0<\/b>Which one of the following quotes best captures the main concern of the passage?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0\u201cThe telling clause here is Unless he is certain of doing well.\u201d<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0\u201cBad grammar produces bad sentences.\u201d<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0\u201cStrunk and White caution against too many simple sentences in a row, but simple sentences provide a path you can follow when you fear getting lost in the tangles of rhetoric . . .\u201d<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0\u201cNouns and verbs are the two indispensable parts of writing. Without one of each, no group of words can be a sentence . . .\u201d<\/p>\n

Download CAT Previous Papers PDF<\/a><\/p>\n

Take Free CAT Video Lectures<\/a><\/p>\n


\nQuestion 13:\u00a0<\/b>All of the following statements can be inferred from the passage EXCEPT that:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0sentences do not always have to be complete.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0the subject-predicate relation is the same as the noun-verb relation.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0the primary purpose of grammar is to ensure that sentences remain simple.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0\u201cGrammar Police\u201d is a metaphor for critics who focus on linguistic rules.<\/p>\n

Question 14:\u00a0<\/b>Inferring from the passage, the author could be most supportive of which one of the following practices?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0The availability of language software that will standardise the rules of grammar as an aid to writers.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0A campaign demanding that a writer\u2019s creative license should allow the breaking of grammatical rules.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0A Creative Writing course that focuses on how to avoid the use of rhetoric.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0The critique of standardised rules of punctuation and capitalisation.<\/p>\n

Instructions<\/b><\/p>\n

The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the late 1960s, while studying the northern-elephant-seal population along the coasts of Mexico and California, Burney Le Boeuf and his colleagues couldn\u2019t help but notice that the threat calls of males at some sites sounded different from those of males at other sites. . . . That was the first time dialects were documented in a nonhuman mammal. . . .<\/p>\n

All the northern elephant seals that exist today are descendants of the small herd that survived on Isla Guadalupe [after the near extinction of the species in the nineteenth century]. As that tiny population grew, northern elephant seals started to recolonize former breeding locations. It was precisely on the more recently colonized islands where Le Boeuf found that the tempos of the male vocal displays showed stronger differences to the ones from Isla Guadalupe, the founder colony.<\/p>\n

In order to test the reliability of these dialects over time, Le Boeuf and other researchers visited A\u00f1o Nuevo Island in California\u2014the island where males showed the slowest pulse rates in their calls\u2014every winter from 1968 to 1972. \u201cWhat we found is that the pulse rate increased, but it still remained relatively slow compared to the other colonies we had measured in the past\u201d Le Boeuf told me.<\/p>\n

At the individual level, the pulse of the calls stayed the same: A male would maintain his vocal signature throughout his lifetime. But the average pulse rate was changing. Immigration could have been responsible for this increase, as in the early 1970s, 43 percent of the males on A\u00f1o Nuevo had come from southern rookeries that had a faster pulse rate. This led Le Boeuf and his collaborator, Lewis Petrinovich, to deduce that the dialects were, perhaps, a result of isolation over time, after the breeding sites had been recolonized. For instance, the first settlers of A\u00f1o Nuevo could have had, by chance, calls with low pulse rates. At other sites, where the scientists found faster pulse rates, the opposite would have happened\u2014seals with faster rates would have happened to arrive first.<\/p>\n

As the population continued to expand and the islands kept on receiving immigrants from the original population, the calls in all locations would have eventually regressed to the average pulse rate of the founder colony. In the decades that followed, scientists noticed that the geographical variations reported in 1969 were not obvious anymore. . . . In the early 2010s, while studying northern elephant seals on A\u00f1o Nuevo Island, [researcher Caroline] Casey noticed, too, that what Le Boeuf had heard decades ago was not what she heard now. . . . By performing more sophisticated statistical analyses on both sets of data, [Casey and Le Boeuf] confirmed that dialects existed back then but had vanished. Yet there are other differences between the males from the late 1960s and their great-great-grandsons: Modern males exhibit more individual diversity, and their calls are more complex. While 50 years ago the drumming pattern was quite simple and the dialects denoted just a change in tempo, Casey explained, the calls recorded today have more complex structures, sometimes featuring doublets or triplets. . . .<\/p>\n

Download CAT Maths formulas PDF<\/a><\/p>
\nQuestion 15: <\/b>All of the following can be inferred from Le Boeuf\u2019s study as described in the passage EXCEPT that:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0male northern elephant seals might not have exhibited dialects had they not become nearly extinct in the nineteenth century.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0changes in population and migration had no effect on the call pulse rate of individual male northern elephant seals.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0the influx of new northern elephant seals into A\u00f1o Nuevo Island would have soon made the call pulse rate of its male seals exceed that of those at Isla Guadalupe.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0the average call pulse rate of male northern elephant seals at A\u00f1o Nuevo Island increased from the early 1970s till the disappearance of dialects.<\/p>\n

Question 16:\u00a0<\/b>Which one of the following conditions, if true, could have ensured that male northern elephant seal dialects did not disappear?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Besides Isla Guadalupe, there was one more surviving colony with the same average male call tempo from which no migration took place.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0The call tempo of individual male seals in host colonies changed to match the average call tempo of immigrant male seals.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Besides Isla Guadalupe, there was one more founder colony with the same average male call tempo from which male seals migrated to various other colonies.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0The call tempo of individual immigrant male seals changed to match the average tempo of resident male seals in the host colony.<\/p>\n

Question 17:\u00a0<\/b>Which one of the following best sums up the overall history of transformation of male northern elephant seal calls?<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Owing to migrations in the aftermath of near species extinction, the average call pulse rates in the recolonised breeding locations exhibited a gradual increase until they matched the tempo at the founding colony.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0The calls have transformed from exhibiting simple composition, less individual variety, and great regional variety to complex composition, great individual variety, and less regional variety.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Owing to migrations in the aftermath of near species extinction, the calls have transformed from exhibiting complex composition, less individual variety, and great regional variety to simple composition, less individual variety, and great regional variety.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0The calls have transformed from exhibiting simple composition, great individual variety, and less regional variety to complex composition, less individual variety, and great regional variety.<\/p>\n

Question 18:\u00a0<\/b>From the passage it can be inferred that the call pulse rate of male northern elephant seals in the southern rookeries was faster because:<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0the male northern elephant seals of Isla Guadalupe with faster call pulse rates might have been the original settlers of the southern rookeries.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0a large number of male northern elephant seals migrated from the southern rookeries to A\u00f1o Nuevo Island in the early 1970s.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0a large number of male northern elephant seals from A\u00f1o Nuevo Island might have migrated to the southern rookeries to recolonise them.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0the calls of male northern elephant seals in the southern rookeries have more sophisticated structures, containing doublets and triplets.<\/p>\n

Question 19:\u00a0<\/b>Five jumbled up sentences, related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out and key in the number of the sentence as your answer:<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. For feminists, the question of how we read is inextricably linked with the question of what we read.
\n2. Elaine Showalter\u2019s critique of the literary curriculum is exemplary of this work.
\n3. Androcentric literature structures the reading experience differently depending on the gender of the reader.
\n4. The documentation of this realization was one of the earliest tasks undertaken by feminist critics.
\n5. More specifically, the feminist inquiry into the activity of reading begins with the realization that the literary canon is androcentric, and that this has a profoundly damaging effect on women readers.<\/p>\n

Question 20:\u00a0<\/b>The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.<\/p>\n

For nearly a century most psychologists have embraced one view of intelligence. Individuals are born with more or less intelligence potential (I.Q.); this potential is heavily influenced by heredity and difficult to alter; experts in measurement can determine a person\u2019s intelligence early in life, currently from paper-and-pencil measures, perhaps eventually from examining the brain in action or even scrutinizing his\/her genome. Recently, criticism of this conventional wisdom has mounted. Biologists ask if speaking of a single entity called \u201cintelligence\u201d is coherent and question the validity of measures used to estimate heritability of a trait in humans, who, unlike plants or animals, are not conceived and bred under controlled conditions.<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Biologists have questioned the long-standing view that \u2018intelligence\u2019 is a single entity and the attempts to estimate it’s heritability.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Biologists have criticised that conventional wisdom that individuals are born with more or less intelligence potential.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Biologists have started questioning psychologists’ view of ‘intelligence’ as a measurable immutable characteristic of an individual.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Biologists have questioned the view that \u2018intelligence\u2019 is a single entity and the ways in which what is inherited<\/p>\n

Question 21:\u00a0<\/b>The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:<\/p>\n

1. Relying on narrative structure alone, indigenous significances of nineteenth-century San folktales are hard to determine.
\n2. Using their supernatural potency, benign shamans transcend the levels of the San cosmos in order to deal with social conflict and to protect material resources and enjoy a measure of respect that sets them apart from ordinary people.
\n3. Selected tales reveal that they deal with a form of spiritual conflict that has social implications and concern conflict between people and living or dead malevolent shamans.
\n4. Meaning can be elicited, and the tales contextualized, by probing beneath the narrative of verbatim, original-language records and exploring the connotations of highly significant words and phrases.<\/p>\n

Question 22:\u00a0<\/b>The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.<\/p>\n

As Soviet power declined, the world became to some extent multipolar, and Europe strove to define an independent identity. What a journey Europe has undertaken to reach this point. It had in every century changed its internal structure and invented new ways of thinking about the nature of international order. Now at the culmination of an era, Europe, in order to participate in it, felt obliged to set aside the political mechanisms through which it had conducted its affairs for three and a half centuries. Impelled also by the desire to cushion the emergent unification of Germany, the new European Union established a common currency in 2002 and a formal political structure in 2004. It proclaimed a Europe united, whole, and free, adjusting its differences by peaceful mechanisms.<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Europe has consistently changed in keeping with the changing world order and that has culminated in a united Europe.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0The establishment of a formal political structure in Europe was hastened by the unification of Germany and the emergence of a multipolar world.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Europe has consistently changed its internal structure to successfully adapt to the changing world order.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Europe has chosen to lower political and economic heterogeneity, in order to adapt itself to an emerging multi-polar world.<\/p>\n

Download CAT Previous Solved Papers<\/a><\/p>\n

Free Live Classes – Cracku Youtube<\/a><\/p>\n


\nQuestion 23:\u00a0<\/b>The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.<\/p>\n

For years, movies and television series like Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) paint an unrealistic picture of the \u201cscience of voices.\u201d In the 1994 movie Clear and Present Danger an expert listens to a brief recorded utterance and declares that the speaker is \u201cCuban, aged 35 to 45, educated in the […] eastern United States.\u201d The recording is then fed to a supercomputer that matches the voice to that of a suspect, concluding that the probability of correct identification is 90%. This sequence sums up a good number of misimpressions about forensic phonetics, which have led to errors in real- life justice. Indeed, that movie scene exemplifies the so-called \u201cCSI effect\u201d\u2014the phenomenon in which judges hold unrealistic expectations of the capabilities of forensic science.<\/p>\n

a)\u00a0Although voice recognition is often presented as evidence in legal cases, its scientific basis can be shaky.<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0Voice recognition as used in many movies to identify criminals has been used to identify criminals in real life also.<\/p>\n

c)\u00a0Movies and televisions have led to the belief that the use of forensic phonetics in legal investigations is robust and fool proof.<\/p>\n

d)\u00a0Voice recognition has started to feature prominently in crime-scene intelligence investigations because of movies and television series.<\/p>\n

Question 24:\u00a0<\/b>The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:<\/p>\n

1. Tensions and sometimes conflict remain an issue in and between the 11 states in South East Asia (Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam).
\n2. China\u2019s rise as a regional military power and its claims in the South China Sea have become an increasingly pressing security concern for many South East Asian states.
\n3. Since the 1990s, the security environment of South East Asia has seen both continuity and profound changes.
\n4. These concerns cause states from outside the region to take an active interest in South East Asian security.<\/p>\n

Question 25:\u00a0<\/b>Five jumbled up sentences, related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out and key in the number of the sentence as your answer:<\/p>\n

1. Talk was the most common way for enslaved men and women to subvert the rules of their bondage, to gain more agency than they were supposed to have.
\n2. Even in conditions of extreme violence and unfreedom, their words remained ubiquitous, ephemeral, irrepressible, and potentially transgressive.
\n3. Slaves came from societies in which oaths, orations, and invocations carried great potency, both between people and as a connection to the all-powerful spirit world.
\n4. Freedom of speech and the power to silence may have been preeminent markers of white liberty in Colonies, but at the same time, slavery depended on dialogue: slaves could never be completely muted.
\n5. Slave-owners obsessed over slave talk, though they could never control it, yet feared its power to bind and inspire\u2014for, as everyone knew, oaths, whispers, and secret conversations bred conspiracy and revolt.<\/p>\n

Question 26:\u00a0<\/b>The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:<\/p>\n

1. Man has used poisons for assassination purposes ever since the dawn of civilization, against individual enemies but also occasionally against armies.
\n2. These dangers were soon recognized, and resulted in two international declarations\u2014in 1874 in Brussels and in 1899 in The Hague\u2014that prohibited the use of poisoned weapons.
\n3. The foundation of microbiology by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch offered new prospects for those interested in biological weapons because it allowed agents to be chosen and designed on a rational basis.
\n4. Though treaties were all made in good faith, they contained no means of control, and so fail<\/p>\n

Answers & Solutions:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

1)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Option A<\/u>: This element is discussed in the third paragraph: {“...The anarchists and their precursors were unique on the political Left in affirming that workers and peasants, grasping the chance that arose to bring an end to centuries of exploitation and tyranny, were inevitably betrayed by the new class of politicians, whose first priority was to re-establish a centralized state power.<\/em>..”} Prior to making this claim, the failure of the French revolution is highlighted, and this segment is subsequently tied to it. Hence, Option A is definitely a point that is made in the passage.<\/p>\n

Option B:<\/u> This has been outlined in the fourth paragraph: {“...For anarchists, the state itself is the enemy, and they have applied the same interpretation to the outcome of every revolution of the 19th and 20th centuries. This is not merely because every state keeps a watchful and sometimes punitive eye on its dissidents, but because every state protects the privileges of the powerful..<\/em>. “}<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: The last two paragraphs present the perception associated with individualist-anarchism: {“...desirable freedom of an individual or family to possess the resources needed for living, while not implying the right to own the resources needed by others. . . .<\/em>There are, unsurprisingly, several traditions of individualist anarchism, one of them deriving from the \u2018conscious egoism\u2019 of the German writer Max Stirner (1806-56), and another from a remarkable series of 19th-century American figures who argued that in protecting our own autonomy and associating with others for common advantages, we are promoting the good of all..<\/em>.”} Thus, we can evidently understand the statement in C to be true.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>, however, is not inferable from the discussion undertaken in the passage. The author does not pinpoint “a mainstream mistrust of collectivism” as the source of the misconception of anarchism “espousing lawlessness and violence”.\u00a0No causal element is discussed, and thus, the statement in D is not an argument that is made\u00a0in the passage.<\/p>\n

Hence, Option D is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

2)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The third paragraph renders us with sufficient information concerning\u00a0the manner of betrayal. The failure of the Frech Revolution is being attributed to the deceit of the new class of politicians who not only\u00a0prioritised the re-establishment and centralisation of authority but also unleashed a reign of terror on the ordinary masses. The author hints at this re-installation of power and the\u00a0atrocities committed on the common people, who are the very drivers of the revolution, being the\u00a0desertion of the principles of the French Revolution by the\u00a0new ruling class of politicians. Any statement that aligns with this understanding would be a suitable answer. Option A brings in the concept of an impact on the\u00a0market, which is not mentioned in the passage. Additionally, it does not signify betrayal of any kind. Same can be said about the statement in Option B. Option C is a strong candidate that symbolises betrayal. However, can we appropriately associate\u00a0it with the underlying principles of the revolution?\u00a0\u00a0The author’s primary focus is on the cost borne by the ordinary populations, and despite the revolution being realised by their sacrifices, they are still the ones being subjected to inequity and torment. Although C highlights betrayal, it does not truly coincide with the idea being conveyed. The afore-mentioned element is appropriately captured by Option D: it highlights how the new class of politicians utilised the indignation of the masses\/workers for the revolution – to topple authority and rise to power – and then stab them in the back by turning to oppress them.<\/p>\n

3)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

We can derive our\u00a0understanding of these two groups from the following:\u00a0{“...There are, unsurprisingly, several traditions of individualist anarchism, one of them deriving from the \u2018conscious egoism\u2019 of the German writer Max Stirner (1806-56), and another from a remarkable series of 19th-century American figures who argued that in protecting our own autonomy<\/strong> and associating with others for common advantages<\/strong>, we are promoting the good of all. These thinkers differed<\/strong> from free-market liberals in their absolute mistrust of American capitalism<\/strong>, and in their emphasis on mutualism<\/strong>.<\/em>..”}<\/p>\n

It is evident that both the groups prioritize individual autonomy; however, the latter does not put emphasis on mutualism. The mistrust of American capitalism is an additional facet marking the difference {but not captured in any of the options}. Option A<\/u> aptly highlights the difference between the two factions, and is, hence, the correct answer.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: Preferences concerning state configuration or involvement are not discussed in the passage, and hence, we can eliminate this option.<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: Perspectives regarding the nature of capitalism are not stated in the passage, and thus, we can effortlessly discard this option<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: None of the elements stated in this option can be understood from the passage, and therefore, can be rejected.<\/p>\n

4)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

One has to be mindful of the question:\u00a0\u00a0the set that is conceptually closest<\/strong> to the concerns<\/strong> of the passage.<\/p>\n

The passage is clearly about ‘Anarchism’, and the discussion pertaining to ‘Revolution’ is a sub-element. This elementary understanding helps us pare down the viable choices to Options A and D. ‘Betrayal’ is again a minor sub-element used to supplement the core argument concerning the authority of the ‘State’ and the justified antagonism of the\u00a0anarchists towards it. Additionally, towards the end of the discussion, individual autonomy and freedom serve as the focal points. Thus, of the two likely choices, Option A is more appropriate and conceptually closest to the concerns of the passage.<\/p>\n

Take Free CAT Daily Tests (With Video Solutions)<\/a><\/p>
\n5)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(B)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Option A<\/u>: The various derivations of anarchism cannot be associated with\u00a0Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. We don’t have the requisite information to support this claim.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: This has been presented as the motto of every anarchist faction: wherein the state is the enemy {opposition to the centralization of power}. While there are additional beliefs associated with different schools of anarchist thought, this antagonism towards centralised power forms their core.<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: This belief has been shown to be limited to\u00a0individualist anarchism {based on the information from the passage}; cannot be stated as a common attribute.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: This assertion would be a gross understatement; the latter half of the option is especially a bit\u00a0odd {no such idea has been implied}.<\/p>\n

Hence, of the given choices,\u00a0Option B is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

6)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Options A and C are economically sound decisions. Option B might be a viable choice, as well. However, Option D\u00a0would not be an economically sound decision for a small purchase in the local market that is worth one-eighth of a bolt of cloth.\u00a0Concerning small transactions, the author highlights the limitations that stemmed from a\u00a0textile form of\u00a0currency: “…Furthermore, a full bolt had a particular value. If consumers cut textiles into smaller pieces to buy or sell something worth less than a full bolt, that, too, greatly lessened the value of the textiles<\/em>…” Thus, cutting the cloth would greatly diminish its value {and consequently cannot be considered as a sensible\u00a0decision}. Hence, Option D is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

7)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The author evidently highlights the stability of utilizing textiles given its abundant supply{“...textile production was widespread and there were fewer problems with the supply of textiles..<\/em>.”}, the steady standard of measurement {“...the dimensions of a bolt of silk held remarkably steady from the third to the tenth century: 56 cm wide and 12 m long.<\/em>..”} and reliable quality {“...Furthermore, a full bolt had a particular value. If consumers …<\/em>“}. Transportation is not a dominant variable that is considered in the discussion pertaining to textiles. Hence, Option A is the correct choice.<\/p>\n

8)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Let us inspect the individual statements:<\/p>\n

Option A<\/u>: The author does not make any such claim. The following is stated in this regard: “...Grain, because it rotted easily, was not used nearly as much as coins and textiles.<\/em>..”. Thus, the marginal usage of grains is presented relative to that of coins and textiles. Therefore, it cannot be understood that perishable currencies such as grains were not utilised for official work.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: The author simply states that “...Coins did have certain advantages: they were durable, recognisable and provided a convenient medium of exchange, especially for smaller transactions..<\/em>.” Presenting them as being more valuable than textile currency would be incorrect.<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: This would be imprecise as the author portrays the following: “...Grain, because it rotted easily, was not used nearly as much as coins and textiles, but taxpayers were required to pay grain to the government as a share of their annual tax obligations, and official salaries were expressed in weights of grain.<\/em>..” The statement here deviates from this depiction.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: This statement can be understood from the final paragraph, wherein the author states: “...In actuality, our own currency system today has some similarities even as it is changing in front of our eyes. . . . We have cash – coins for small transactions like paying for parking at a meter, and banknotes for other items; cheques.<\/em>..”. Hence, Option D is a valid inference<\/p>\n

9)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Let us pay heed to the following excerpt: “…In actuality, our own currency system today has some similarities even as it is changing in front of our eyes. . . . We have cash – coins for small transactions like paying for parking at a meter, and banknotes for other items; cheques and debit\/credit cards for other, often larger, types of payments. At the same time, we are shifting to electronic banking and making payments online. Some young people never use cash [and] do not know how to write a cheque<\/em>…”<\/p>\n

Based on the above, we can infer Options A, B and C as the similarities that are implied. Concerning Option D, while the author does mention the present currency system\u00a0as a\u00a0changing\/dynamic one, the same cannot be said about the Tang dynasty. The author does not highlight this element as a similarity.\u00a0\u00a0Hence, Option D is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

10)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

We need to find a statement, which if false<\/strong>, aligns with the discussion\/serves as a\u00a0supporting argument. Let us inspect the individual options:<\/p>\n

Option A<\/u>: In its current form, this statement is in tune with the author’s assertion. However, if false, it is antagonistic to the claim being made in the passage. Hence, we can eliminate this option.<\/p>\n

Options\u00a0B and C<\/u>: Regardless of whether these statements are true or false, they do very little to further the idea presented in the passage.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: This statement implies that complete sentences do not need nouns and verbs. However, in the passage, the author says otherwise; thus, if this sentence is false, it perfectly aligns with the argument made in the passage. Therefore, Option D,\u00a0 if false, could be seen as a supplementary argument.<\/p>\n

11)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The author intends to highlight that the rudimentary combination of a noun and a verb serves as the simplest form of expression; two basic yet immensely significant entities coupled together that is representative of a broader and perhaps, complex group of entities\u00a0{a sentence}. Option A is closest to such a relationship:\u00a0 vegetables and spices (two elements) combined to represent a larger group – ‘dishes’. The same cannot be said about the rest of the options, since they evidently deviate from the core message being conveyed.<\/p>\n

Download CAT Maths formulas PDF<\/a><\/p>
\n12)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(B)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The author begins by highlighting the necessity for a set of codes (enabled by grammar) to organize communication and avoid confusion. He then proceeds to present supplementary arguments in this regard (elements associated with rhetoric and its specialists)\u00a0and emphasizes how even proper, intentional\u00a0simplification can be attained only through a firm grasp of the rudiments of grammar. Therefore, it can be observed that grammar is the focal point here and the correct choice should definitely align with this. Option B aptly captures the main concern raised in the passage.\u00a0Options A and C fail to include the idea revolving around grammar and instead focuses on the additives. Option D is close; however, the mention of nouns and verbs is with the intention to supplement the idea highlighted in B. These simply serve as an illustration to emphasize the significance of grammar. Thus, between the two options B and D, Option B is the suitable choice.<\/p>\n

13)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(C)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Option A<\/u>: This can be inferred from “…Must you write complete sentences each time, every time? Perish the thought. If your work consists only of fragments and floating clauses, the Grammar Police aren\u2019t going to come and take you away.<\/em>..” The author presents an illustration to show how a simple combination of a noun and verb forms a complete expression.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: Based on the limited information available from the passage, we can make this inference from “...no group of words can be a sentence, since a sentence is, by definition, a group of words containing a subject (noun) and a predicate (verb).<\/em>..”<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: The author does not make any such claim. Grammar serves as a mechanism to organize communication and avoid confusion. However, the “primary purpose” of grammar is not to ensure that sentences remain “simple”. Since we cannot infer this statement from the passage, it is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: Although not explicitly mentioned, we can understand the sentiment behind using the term “Grammar Police”. The author is using this as a metaphor for the strong adherents of the grammatic rules (who are perhaps swift to judge and criticize).<\/p>\n

Therefore, we can infer all of the statements except for the one in Option C.<\/p>\n

14)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

In this question, we need to identify the statement that coincides with the aspects discussed by the author. Putting ourselves in the author’s shoes, we know that grammar (and the necessity to appropriately learn it) is the primary idea that needs to be conveyed. Writers with a substantial understanding of the elementary rules in grammar\u00a0can appreciate the “comforting simplicity at its heart<\/em>” (is what the author claims). Thus, the author will surely support any stance that concurs with the above.<\/p>\n

Option A<\/u>: This will definitely supplement the assertion made by the author. It will enable writers with the requisite understanding of the standard governing rules – a significant necessity highlighted by the author.\u00a0He is bound to favor such an action.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: The author would endorse such drastic measures (does not match the tone). The pliability of grammatical rules is a noticeable comment made by the author (but only for those well-versed with it). Hence, we can eliminate this option.<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: The author does not portray any view that promotes the eschewal of rhetoric. This again deviates from the discussion in the passage and can be scrapped as the correct choice.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: The focus is broad: on grammar (not just on punctuation and capitalization).<\/p>\n

It is evident that Option A is the only sensible statement that the author would support here.<\/p>\n

15)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(C)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Let us inspect the individual statements:<\/p>\n

Take Free CAT Video Lectures<\/a><\/p>Option A<\/u>: This can be inferred from the second paragraph [“...It was precisely on the more recently colonized islands where Le Boeuf found that the tempos of the male vocal displays showed stronger differences to the ones from Isla Guadalupe, the founder colony…<\/em>“]. The inception of the eventual dialects has been indirectly attributed to the dynamic changes that occurred as a result of the near extinction of the elephant seals. Hence, we can infer Option A from the passage.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: This can be inferred from the fourth paragraph: [“...At the individual level, the pulse of the calls stayed the same: A male would maintain his vocal signature throughout his lifetime.<\/em>..”] The changing variables have little to no effect of the individual vocal signature of the elephant seals. Thus, Option B can be inferred from the passage.<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: No such claim is made in the passage.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: This can be inferred from [“...could have been responsible for this increase, as in the early 1970s, 43 per cent of the males on A\u00f1o Nuevo had come from southern rookeries that had a faster pulse rate.<\/em>..”] and the discussion at the beginning of the final paragraph: [“...As the population continued to expand and the islands kept on receiving immigrants from the original population, the calls in all locations would have eventually regressed to the average pulse rate of the founder colony..<\/em>.].<\/p>\n

Therefore, of the given statements, we cannot infer Option C.<\/p>\n

Take Free CAT Video Lectures<\/a><\/p>
\n16)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

A noticeable clue to\u00a0ensure that the male northern elephant seal dialects did not disappear is presented in the penultimate paragraph: [“...At the individual level, the pulse of the calls stayed the same: A male would maintain his vocal signature throughout his lifetime. But the average pulse rate was changing. Immigration could have been responsible for this increase, as in the early 1970s, 43 per cent of the males on A\u00f1o Nuevo had come from southern rookeries that had a faster pulse rate.<\/em>.. “]. The loss in the dialect is due to the influx of seals with a faster pulse rate and “as the population continued to expand and the islands kept on receiving immigrants from the original population, the calls in all locations would have eventually regressed to the average pulse rate of the founder colony.” Thus, if the individual pulse rate of the immigrants varies or adapts to the existing population, this could preserve the dialect in a particular region. The statement in Option D reflects this specific idea and helps sustain the existing dialect in a given population.\u00a0Options A and C\u00a0do little to contribute to the cause of preventing the disappearance of the dialects.\u00a0\u00a0Option B aligns with the discussion in the passage and is responsible for the regression of the dialects. Hence, Option D is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

17)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(B)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The following excerpt serves as an essential source for comparing the difference in the attributes of the elephant seals: [“...Yet there are other differences between the males from the late 1960s and their great-great-grandsons: Modern males exhibit more individual diversity, and their calls are more complex. While 50 years ago the drumming pattern was quite simple and the dialects denoted just a change in tempo, Casey explained, the calls recorded today have more complex structures, sometimes featuring doublets or triplets. . . .<\/em>“]<\/p>\n

In the late 1960s, the elephant seal calls were marked by having a simple drumming pattern which later transformed into calls with marked individual diversity and sophistication. Additionally, the dialects that were present in the 1960s were not evident during the study undertaken in the early 2010s, thereby indicating a decrease in the regional variations in the calls. These elements are aptly captured in Option B.<\/p>\n

18)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

We can make a\u00a0direct\u00a0inference based on the following excerpt from the fourth paragraph: [“...This led Le Boeuf and his collaborator, Lewis Petrinovich, to deduce that the dialects were, perhaps, a result of isolation over time, after the breeding sites had been recolonised. For instance, the first settlers of A\u00f1o Nuevo could have had, by chance, calls with low pulse rates. At other sites, where the scientists found faster pulse rates, the opposite would have happened\u2014seals with faster rates would have happened to arrive first..<\/em>.”]<\/p>\n

Based on the above information, the only reason behind\u00a0the\u00a0call pulse rate of male northern elephant seals in the southern rookeries being faster would be because\u00a0the male northern elephant seals of Isla Guadalupe with faster call pulse rates might have been the original settlers of this region. Option A correctly highlights this reason and is, hence, the correct answer.<\/p>\n

Download CAT Previous Papers PDF<\/a><\/p>
\n19)\u00a0Answer:\u00a03<\/b><\/p>\n

The passage is focused on delineating the mechanism of reading as perceived by feminists (and the criticism associated with it). The arrangement (1)-(5)-(4)-(2) forms a coherent paragraph and Statement (3) stands out like a sore thumb. While the passage describes the elements associated with a feminist perspective, (3) brings in a description of androcentric literature that does not align with the context.<\/p>\n

20)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(A)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The paragraph highlights the following:<\/p>\n

1. The validity of the ubiquitous perspective held by psychologists {of intelligence being a measurable, unalterable entity that is greatly influenced by heredity} is now being questioned by biologists.<\/p>\n

2. The dubiety concerning the aspect of intelligence being hereditary {given the fact that “humans, who, unlike plants or animals, are not conceived and bred under controlled conditions.<\/em>“}<\/p>\n

Thus, a statement capturing these elements is bound to be the answer. Option A<\/u> aptly encompasses these two key points.<\/p>\n

Option B<\/u>: Calling the widely -held perspective as conventional wisdom would be inappropriate. Additionally, the statement here fails to capture point (2).<\/p>\n

Option C<\/u>: Although close, it misses out on the second half of the discussion.<\/p>\n

Option D<\/u>: This option might appear confusing, given that it touches upon both the key elements. However, it is unspecific and comes across as a bit odd {“ways in which what is inherited<\/em>” doesn’t make sense}. Between Options A and D, A is definitely the better choice.<\/p>\n

21)\u00a0Answer:\u00a01432<\/b><\/p>\n

Statement (1) introduces the predicament we face: the difficulty in understanding the indigenous significance of the\u00a0nineteenth century San folktales by simply probing the narrative structure. The author indicates that there are additional variables that need to be considered. The aspect of evaluating elements beyond the “the narrative of verbatim<\/em>” as highlighted in Statement (4). The outcome of such a methodology of exploring these narratives is then presented in the Statements (3) followed by (2). Statement (3) highlights dead-malevolent shamans while (2) talks about benign shamans.\u00a0Hence, we obtain (1)-(4)-(3)-(2) as a coherent paragraph.<\/p>\n

22)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(D)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The passage begins by highlighting Europe’s continual attempt to adapt itself in a multipolar world by striving to be a dynamic entity- nationally and internationally{“changed its internal structure and invented new ways of thinking about the nature of international order<\/em>“}.\u00a0\u00a0Post this, the author portrays how certain stimuli in the modern world has lead Europe to review its political components {“set aside the political mechanisms through which it had conducted its affairs for three and a half centuries<\/em>“} and to make changes in its economic structure {“established a common currency<\/em> “}. Thus, the passage presents two key elements: (1) the fact that Europe has consistently tried to adapt to a changing world and (2) the manner in which Europe has attempted to achieve that in the existing multi-polar setup.\u00a0Option D correctly highlights these points.<\/p>\n

Option A: This misses out on the point\u00a0(2). Furthermore, directly ascribing the unification of Europe to its attempt to rapidly change would be incorrect.<\/p>\n

Option B: This does not fully capture the essence of the passage and misses out on point 1.<\/p>\n

Option C: Although the statement in this option captures point 1, it misses out on point 2.<\/p>\n

Hence, Option D is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

23)\u00a0Answer\u00a0(C)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The passage is primarily about the misconception regarding the capacity of forensic phonetics stemming from its portrayal in movies and television. This aspect is correctly captured by the point stated in C.\u00a0The author does not question the “scientific basis” of the evidence (based on voice recognition) that is presented in legal cases. Hence, Option A can be eliminated. The claim made in Option B cannot be understood from the passage. Same can be said about Option D. Hence, Option C is the correct answer.<\/p>\n

24)\u00a0Answer:\u00a03124<\/b><\/p>\n

Statement (3) introduces the core message: the continuing concerns in the region of South-East Asia. It highlights that since the 1990s there have been dynamic changes in the security environment of this region. Statment (1) adds details by listing the countries present in this region and the existing environment rife with tension\/conflict {a transition from the 1990s into the present world}. Statement (2) continues on this line and cites an event in this regard: China becoming a pressing security concern for the regional countries. Statement (4) puts a cap on this discussion by indicating that the persisting regional instability attracts entities from outside the region. Hence, (3)-(1)-(2)-(4) forms a coherent arrangement.<\/p>\n

25)\u00a0Answer:\u00a03<\/b><\/p>\n

Statements (1), (2), (4) and (5) discuss the aspect of how talking\/freedom of speech was a significant facet associated with the slaves. They emphasise how this element was central to slavery\u00a0 {\u00a0“slaves could never be completely muted”}. Contrarily, Statment (3) goes on a tangential route that associates the potency of “oaths, orations, and invocations” based on the origin of the slaves {discusses “…a connection to the all-powerful spirit world.<\/em>..” which is clearly out of place}. Thus, Statement (3) is the odd-one-out here.<\/p>\n

26)\u00a0Answer:\u00a01324<\/b><\/p>\n

Statement (1) serves as a general introduction to the topic: an inclination towards using poison {or associated agents}. The author mentions that the utility of this element has existed since the dawn of civilization. Statment (3) supplements this idea by mentioning that certain advancements served as a new avenue for the zealots of this subject. Statement (2) delineates on the safeguard that was put into place once the threat posed by this domain was realized. Statement (4) pinpoints the flaw in this safeguard. Hence, we notice that (1)-(3)-(2)-(4) forms a logical arrangement.<\/p>\n

Free CAT preparation App<\/a><\/p>\n

We hope this\u00a0 for CAT 2020 Verbal Question Paper With Answers PDF with Solutions will be helpful to you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 CAT 2020 VARC Question Paper (Slot-1) Download CAT 2020 VARC Slot-1 Questions PDF with detailed solutions. Practice Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension Slot-1 Questions asked in the CAT exam to understand the type and level of questions asked in the exam. Instructions The passage below is accompanied by a set of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":58,"featured_media":60210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[4289,1322],"class_list":{"0":"post-60173","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-cat","8":"tag-cat-2021","9":"tag-cat-varc"},"better_featured_image":{"id":60210,"alt_text":"","caption":"","description":"","media_type":"image","media_details":{"width":1200,"height":630,"file":"2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33.jpg","sizes":{"medium":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-300x158.jpg","width":300,"height":158,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-300x158.jpg"},"large":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-1024x538.jpg","width":1024,"height":538,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-1024x538.jpg"},"thumbnail":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-150x150.jpg","width":150,"height":150,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-150x150.jpg"},"medium_large":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-768x403.jpg","width":768,"height":403,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-768x403.jpg"},"tiny-lazy":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-30x16.jpg","width":30,"height":16,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-30x16.jpg"},"td_218x150":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-218x150.jpg","width":218,"height":150,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-218x150.jpg"},"td_324x400":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-324x400.jpg","width":324,"height":400,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-324x400.jpg"},"td_696x0":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-696x365.jpg","width":696,"height":365,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-696x365.jpg"},"td_1068x0":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-1068x561.jpg","width":1068,"height":561,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-1068x561.jpg"},"td_0x420":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-800x420.jpg","width":800,"height":420,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-800x420.jpg"},"td_80x60":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-80x60.jpg","width":80,"height":60,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-80x60.jpg"},"td_100x70":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-100x70.jpg","width":100,"height":70,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-100x70.jpg"},"td_265x198":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-265x198.jpg","width":265,"height":198,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-265x198.jpg"},"td_324x160":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-324x160.jpg","width":324,"height":160,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-324x160.jpg"},"td_324x235":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-324x235.jpg","width":324,"height":235,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-324x235.jpg"},"td_356x220":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-356x220.jpg","width":356,"height":220,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-356x220.jpg"},"td_356x364":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-356x364.jpg","width":356,"height":364,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-356x364.jpg"},"td_533x261":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-533x261.jpg","width":533,"height":261,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-533x261.jpg"},"td_534x462":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-534x462.jpg","width":534,"height":462,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-534x462.jpg"},"td_696x385":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-696x385.jpg","width":696,"height":385,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-696x385.jpg"},"td_741x486":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-741x486.jpg","width":741,"height":486,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-741x486.jpg"},"td_1068x580":{"file":"fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-1068x580.jpg","width":1068,"height":580,"mime-type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33-1068x580.jpg"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}},"post":60173,"source_url":"https:\/\/cracku.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/fig-02-03-2021_11-18-33.jpg"},"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n